On minimum secure dominating sets of graphs

A subset X of the vertex set of a graph G is a secure dominating set of G if X is a dominating set of G and if, for each vertex u not in X, there is a neighbouring vertex v of u in X such that the swap set (X/{v}) ? {u} is again a dominating set of G, in which case v is called a defender. The secure domination number of G is the cardinality of a smallest secure dominating set of G. In this paper, we show that every graph of minimum degree at least 2 possesses a minimum secure dominating set in which all vertices are defenders. We also characterise the classes of graphs that have secure domination numbers 1, 2 and 3.     

Distance paired domination numbers of graphs

In this paper, we study a generalization of the paired domination number. Let G=(V,E) be a graph without an isolated vertex. A set D⊆V(G) is a k-distance paired dominating set of G if D is a k-distance dominating set of G and the induced subgraph 〈D〉 has a perfect matching. The k-distance paired domination number is the cardinality of a smallest k-distance paired dominating set of G. We investigate properties of the k-distance paired domination number of a graph. We also give an upper bound and a lower bound on the k-distance paired domination number of a non-trivial tree T in terms of the size of T and the number of leaves in T and we also characterize the extremal trees.     

Power domination in graphs

The problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible is closely related to the well-known domination problem in graphs. In 1998, Haynes et al. considered the graph theoretical representation of this problem as a variation of the domination problem. They defined a set S to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set S (following a set of rules for power system monitoring). The power domination number γ_P(G) of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of G. In this paper, we present upper bounds on the power domination number for a connected graph with at least three vertices and a connected claw-free cubic graph in terms of their order. The extremal graphs attaining the upper bounds are also characterized.     

Dominating direct products of graphs

An upper bound for the domination number of the direct product of graphs is proved. It in particular implies that for any graphs G and H, γ(G×H)?3γ(G)γ(H). Graphs with arbitrarily large domination numbers are constructed for which this bound is attained. Concerning the upper domination number we prove that Γ(G×H)?Γ(G)Γ(H), thus confirming a conjecture from [R. Nowakowski, D.F. Rall, Associative graph products and their independence, domination and coloring numbers, Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 16 (1996) 53-79]. Finally, for paired-domination of direct products we prove that γ_pr(G×H)?γ_pr(G)γ_pr(H) for arbitrary graphs G and H, and also present some infinite families of graphs that attain this bound.     

Global italian domination in graphs

Abstract

An Italian dominating function (IDF) on a graph G = (V, E) is a function f: V → {0, 1, 2} satisfying the condition that for every vertex v ∈ V (G) with f (v) = 0, either v is adjacent to a vertex assigned 2 under f, or v is adjacent to at least two vertices assigned 1. The weight of an IDF f is the value ∑_v∈V(G) f (v). The Italian domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_I (G), is the minimum weight of an IDF on G. An IDF f on G is called a global Italian dominating function (GIDF) on G if f is also an IDF on the complement ? of G. The global Italian domination number of G, denoted by γ_gI (G), is the minimum weight of a GIDF on G. In this paper, we initiate the study of the global Italian domination number and we present some strict bounds for the global Italian domination number. In particular, we prove that for any tree T of order n ≥ 4, γ_gI (T) ≤ γ_I (T) + 2 and we characterize all trees with γ_gI (T) = γ_I (T) + 2 and γ_gI (T) = γ_I (T) + 1.     

P 3-factorization of complete multipartite graphs

In this note it is shown that a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a P3-factorizatlon of complete multipartite graph λK, is (1) m≥3, (2) mn≡0(mod 3) and (3)λ(m-1)n≡0(mod 4).     

Domination versus disjunctive domination in graphs

A dominating set in a graph G is a set S of vertices of G such that every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex of S. The domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. For a positive integer b, a set S of vertices in a graph G is a b-disjunctive dominating set in G if every vertex v not in S is adjacent to a vertex of S or has at least b vertices in S at distance 2 from it in G. The b-disjunctive domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a b-disjunctive dominating set. In this paper, we continue the study of disjunctive domination in graphs. We present properties of b-disjunctive dominating sets in a graph. A characterization of minimal b-disjunctive dominating sets is given. We obtain bounds on the ratio of the domination number and the b-disjunctive domination number for various families of graphs, including regular graphs and trees.     

Stratification and domination in graphs II

A graph G is 2-stratified if its vertex set is partitioned into two classes (each of which is a stratum or a color class.) We color the vertices in one color class red and the other color class blue. Let F be a 2-stratified graph with one fixed blue vertex v specified. We say that F is rooted at v. The F-domination number of a graph G is the minimum number of red vertices of G in a red-blue coloring of the vertices of G such that every blue vertex v of G belongs to a copy of F rooted at v. In this paper we investigate the F-domination number when (i) F is a 2-stratified path P₃ on three vertices rooted at a blue vertex which is a vertex of degree 1 in the P₃ and is adjacent to a blue vertex and with the remaining vertex colored red, and (ii) F is a 2-stratified K₃ rooted at a blue vertex and with exactly one red vertex.     

Dominating sets of the comaximal and ideal-based zero-divisor graphs of commutative rings

Abstract

Let R be a commutative ring with nonzero identity, and let I be an ideal of R. The ideal-based zero-divisor graph of R, denoted by Γ_I (R), is the graph whose vertices are the set {x ∈ R \ I| xy ∈ I for some y∈ R \ I} and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if xy ∈ I. Define the comaximal graph of R, denoted by CG(R), to be a graph whose vertices are the elements of R, where two distinct vertices a and b are adjacent if and only if Ra+Rb=R. A nonempty set S ? V of a graph G=(V, E) is a dominating set of G if every vertex in V is either in S or is adjacent to a vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum cardinality among the dominating sets of G. The main object of this paper is to study the dominating sets and domination number of Γ_I (R) and the comaximal graph CG₂(R) \ J (R) (or CGJ (R) for short) where CG₂(R) is the subgraph of CG(R) induced on the nonunit elements of R and J (R) is the Jacobson radical of R.     

The diameter of total domination vertex critical graphs

A graph G with no isolated vertex is total domination vertex critical if for any vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, the total domination number of G-v is less than the total domination number of G. These graphs we call γ_t-critical. If such a graph G has total domination number k, we call it k-γ_t-critical. We characterize the connected graphs with minimum degree one that are γ_t-critical and we obtain sharp bounds on their maximum diameter. We calculate the maximum diameter of a k-γ_t-critical graph for k?8 and provide an example which shows that the maximum diameter is in general at least 5k/3-O(1).     

On matching and total domination in graphs

A set M of edges of a graph G is a matching if no two edges in M are incident to the same vertex. A set S of vertices in G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The matching number is the maximum cardinality of a matching of G, while the total domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between the matching and total domination number of a graph. We observe that the total domination number of every claw-free graph with minimum degree at least three is bounded above by its matching number, and we show that every k-regular graph with k?3 has total domination number at most its matching number. In general, we show that no minimum degree is sufficient to guarantee that the matching number and total domination number are comparable.     

Construction of trees and graphs with equal domination parameters

We provide a simple constructive characterization for trees with equal domination and independent domination numbers, and for trees with equal domination and total domination numbers. We also consider a general framework for constructive characterizations for other equality problems.     

The forcing number of graphs with given girth

In this paper, we study a dynamic coloring of the vertices of a graph G that starts with an initial subset S of colored vertices, with all remaining vertices being non-colored. At each discrete time interval, a colored vertex with exactly one non-colored neighbor forces this non-colored neighbor to be colored. The initial set S is called a forcing set of G if, by iteratively applying the forcing process, every vertex in G becomes colored. The forcing number, originally known as the zero forcing number, and denoted F (G), of G is the cardinality of a smallest forcing set of G. We study lower bounds on the forcing number in terms of its minimum degree and girth, where the girth g of a graph is the length of a shortest cycle in the graph. Let G be a graph with minimum degree δ ≥ 2 and girth g ≥ 3. Davila and Kenter [Theory and Applications of Graphs, Volume 2, Issue 2, Article 1, 2015] conjecture that F (G) ≥ δ + (δ ? 2)(g ? 3). This conjecture has recently been proven for g ≤ 6. The conjecture is also proven when the girth g ≥ 7 and the minimum degree is sufficiently large. In particular, it holds when g = 7 and δ ≥ 481, when g = 8 and δ ≥ 649, when g = 9 and δ ≥ 30, and when g = 10 and δ ≥ 34. In this paper, we prove the conjecture for g ∈ {7, 8, 9, 10} and for all values of δ ≥ 2.     

Upper minus total domination in small-degree regular graphs

A function f:V(G)→{-1,0,1} defined on the vertices of a graph G is a minus total dominating function (MTDF) if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. An MTDF f is minimal if there does not exist an MTDF g:V(G)→{-1,0,1}, f≠g, for which g(v)?f(v) for every v∈V(G). The weight of an MTDF is the sum of its function values over all vertices. The minus total domination number of G is the minimum weight of an MTDF on G, while the upper minus domination number of G is the maximum weight of a minimal MTDF on G. In this paper we present upper bounds on the upper minus total domination number of a cubic graph and a 4-regular graph and characterize the regular graphs attaining these upper bounds.     

Bounds on total domination in claw-free cubic graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set, denoted by TDS, of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S (other than itself). The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G). If G does not contain K_1,3 as an induced subgraph, then G is said to be claw-free. It is shown in [D. Archdeacon, J. Ellis-Monaghan, D. Fischer, D. Froncek, P.C.B. Lam, S. Seager, B. Wei, R. Yuster, Some remarks on domination, J. Graph Theory 46 (2004) 207-210.] that if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least three, then γ_t(G)?n/2. Two infinite families of connected cubic graphs with total domination number one-half their orders are constructed in [O. Favaron, M.A. Henning, C.M. Mynhardt, J. Puech, Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three, J. Graph Theory 34(1) (2000) 9-19.] which shows that this bound of n/2 is sharp. However, every graph in these two families, except for K₄ and a cubic graph of order eight, contains a claw. It is therefore a natural question to ask whether this upper bound of n/2 can be improved if we restrict G to be a connected cubic claw-free graph of order at least 10. In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative. We prove that if G is a connected claw-free cubic graph of order n?10, then γ_t(G)?5n/11.     

On the 2-rainbow domination in graphs

The concept of 2-rainbow domination of a graph G coincides with the ordinary domination of the prism G□K₂. In this paper, we show that the problem of deciding if a graph has a 2-rainbow dominating function of a given weight is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs or chordal graphs. Exact values of 2-rainbow domination numbers of several classes of graphs are found, and it is shown that for the generalized Petersen graphs GP(n,k) this number is between ⌈4n/5⌉ and n with both bounds being sharp.     

Total restrained domination in graphs with minimum degree two

In this paper, we continue the study of total restrained domination in graphs, a concept introduced by Telle and Proskurowksi (Algorithms for vertex partitioning problems on partial k-trees, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 10 (1997) 529-550) as a vertex partitioning problem. A set S of vertices in a graph G=(V,E) is a total restrained dominating set of G if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S and every vertex of V?S is adjacent to a vertex in V?S. The minimum cardinality of a total restrained dominating set of G is the total restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_tr(G). Let G be a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least 2 and with maximum degree Δ where Δ?n-2. We prove that if n?4, then and this bound is sharp. If we restrict G to a bipartite graph with Δ?3, then we improve this bound by showing that and that this bound is sharp.     

The bondage numbers of graphs with small crossing numbers

The bondage number b(G) of a nonempty graph G is the cardinality of a smallest edge set whose removal from G results in a graph with domination number greater than the domination number γ(G) of G. Kang and Yuan proved b(G)?8 for every connected planar graph G. Fischermann, Rautenbach and Volkmann obtained some further results for connected planar graphs. In this paper, we generalize their results to connected graphs with small crossing numbers.     

Total domination in claw-free graphs with minimum degree 2

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set (TDS) of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G). A graph is claw-free if it does not contain K_1,3 as an induced subgraph. It is known [M.A. Henning, Graphs with large total domination number, J. Graph Theory 35(1) (2000) 21-45] that if G is a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least two and G∉{C₃,C₅, C₆, C₁₀}, then γ_t(G)?4n/7. In this paper, we show that this upper bound can be improved if G is restricted to be a claw-free graph. We show that every connected claw-free graph G of order n and minimum degree at least two satisfies γ_t(G)?(n+2)/2 and we characterize those graphs for which γ_t(G)=⌊(n+2)/2⌋.     

Integral complete multipartite graphs

A graph is called integral if all eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix are integers. In this paper, we investigate integral complete r-partite graphs K_p1,p2,…,pr=K_{a1·p1,a2·p2,…,as·ps} with s=3,4. We can construct infinite many new classes of such integral graphs by solving some certain Diophantine equations. These results are different from those in the existing literature. For s=4, we give a positive answer to a question of Wang et al. [Integral complete r-partite graphs, Discrete Math. 283 (2004) 231-241]. The problem of the existence of integral complete multipartite graphs K_{a1·p1,a2·p2,…,as·ps} with arbitrarily large number s remains open.