Quadratic data envelopment analysis

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) offers a piece-wise linear approximation of the production frontier. The approximation tends to be poor if the true frontier is not concave, eg in case of economies of scale or of specialisation. To improve the flexibility of the DEA frontier and to gain in empirical fit, we propose to extend DEA towards a more general piece-wise quadratic approximation, called Quadratic Data Envelopment Analysis (QDEA). We show that QDEA gives statistically consistent estimates for all production frontiers with bounded Hessian eigenvalues. Our Monte-Carlo simulations suggest that QDEA can substantially improve efficiency estimation in finite samples relative to standard DEA models.     

Transconcave data envelopment analysis

Transconcave data envelopment analysis (TDEA) extends standard data envelopment analysis (DEA), in order to account for non-convex production technologies, such as those involving increasing returns-to-scale or diseconomies of scope. TDEA introduces non-convexities by transforming the range and the domain of the production frontier, thus replacing the standard assumption that the production frontier is concave with the more general assumption that the frontier is concave transformable. TDEA gives statistically consistent estimates for all monotonically increasing and concave transformable frontiers. In addition, Monte Carlo simulations suggest that TDEA can substantially improve inefficiency estimation in small samples compared to the standard Banker, Charnes and Cooper model and the full disposable hull model (FDH).     

Benefit-cost analysis using data envelopment analysis

Benefit-cost analysis is required by law and regulation throughout the federal government. Robert Dorfman (1996) declares ‘Three prominent shortcomings of benefit-cost analysis as currently practiced are (1) it does not identify the population segments that the proposed measure benefits or harms (2) it attempts to reduce all comparisons to a single dimension, generally dollars and cents and (3) it conceals the degree of inaccuracy or uncertainty in its estimates.’ The paper develops an approach for conducting benefit-cost analysis derived from data envelopment analysis (DEA) that overcomes each of Dorfman's objections. The models and methodology proposed give decision makers a tool for evaluating alternative policies and projects where there are multiple constituencies who may have conflicting perspectives. This method incorporates multiple incommensurate attributes while allowing for measures of uncertainty. An application is used to illustrate the method. This work was funded by grant N00014-99-1-0719 from the Office of Naval Research     

Data envelopment analysis with missing data

A first systematic attempt to use data containing missing values in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is presented. It is formally shown that allowing missing values into the data set can only improve estimation of the best-practice frontier. Technically, DEA can automatically exclude the missing data from the analysis if blank data entries are coded by appropriate numerical values.     

Data envelopment analysis with stochastic data

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has proven to be a useful technique in evaluating the efficiency of decision making units that produce multiple-outputs using multiple-inputs. However, the ability to estimate efficiency reliably is hampered in the presence of measurement error and other statistical noise. A main and legitimate criticism of all deterministic models is the inability to separate out measurement error from inefficiency, both of which are unobserved. In this paper, we consider panel data models of efficiency estimation. One DEA model that has been used averages cross-sectional efficiency estimates across time and has been shown to work relatively well. In this paper, it is shown that this approach leads to biased efficiency estimates and provide an alternative model that corrects this problem. The approaches are compared using simulated data for illustrative purposes.     

Theory of integer-valued data envelopment analysis

Conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models assume real-valued inputs and outputs. In many occasions, some inputs and/or outputs can only take integer values. In some cases, rounding the DEA solution to the nearest whole number can lead to misleading efficiency assessments and performance targets. This paper develops the axiomatic foundation for DEA in the case of integer-valued data, introducing new axioms of “natural disposability” and “natural divisibility”. We derive a DEA production possibility set that satisfies the minimum extrapolation principle under our refined set of axioms. We also present a mixed integer linear programming formula for computing efficiency scores. An empirical application to Iranian university departments illustrates the approach.     

Interactive classification using data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we illustrate how data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be used to aid interactive classification. We assume that the scoring function for the classification problem is known. We use DEA to identify difficult to classify cases from a database and present them to the decision-maker one at a time. The decision-maker assigns a class to the presented case and based on the decision-maker class assignment, a tradeoff cutting plane is drawn using the scoring function and decision-maker’s input. The procedure continues for finite number of iterations and terminates with the final discriminant function. We also show how a hybrid DEA and mathematical programming approach can be used when user interaction is not desired. For non-interactive case, we compare a hybrid DEA and mathematical programming based approach with several statistical and machine learning approaches, and show that the hybrid approach provides competitive performance when compared to the other machine learning approaches.     

Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis

The technique for efficiency measurement known as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been extended to allow non-discretionary inputs that affect production. Several methods exist for measuring efficiency while controlling for these fixed factors of production. This paper reviews these approaches, providing a discussion of strengths and weaknesses and highlighting potential limitations. In addition, a new approach is developed that overcomes existing weaknesses. To facilitate comparison, an analysis using simulated data is performed. The results show that the new approach improves existing models and performs relatively well.     

Variables reduction in data envelopment analysis

In real applications of data envelopment analysis (DEA), there are a number of pitfalls that could have a major influence on the efficiency. Some of these pitfalls are avoidable and the others remain problematic. One of the most important pitfalls that the researchers confront is the closeness of the number of operational units and the number of inputs and outputs. In performance measurement using DEA, the closeness of these two numbers could yield a large number of efficient units. In this article, some inputs or outputs will be aggregated and the number of inputs and outputs are reduced iteratively. Numerical examples show that in comparison to the single DEA method, our approach has the fewest efficient units. This means that our approach has a superior ability to discriminate the performance of the DMUs.     

Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data

In original data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, inputs and outputs are measured by exact values on a ratio scale. Cooper et al. [Management Science, 45 (1999) 597–607] recently addressed the problem of imprecise data in DEA, in its general form. We develop in this paper an alternative approach for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Our approach is to transform a non-linear DEA model to a linear programming equivalent, on the basis of the original data set, by applying transformations only on the variables. Upper and lower bounds for the efficiency scores of the units are then defined as natural outcomes of our formulations. It is our specific formulation that enables us to proceed further in discriminating among the efficient units by means of a post-DEA model and the endurance indices. We then proceed still further in formulating another post-DEA model for determining input thresholds that turn an inefficient unit to an efficient one.     

E-DEA: Enhanced data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has enjoyed a wide range of acceptance by researchers and practitioners alike as an instrument of performance analysis and management since its introduction in 1978. Many formulations and thousands of applications of DEA have been reported in a considerable variety of academic and professional journals all around the world. Almost all of the formulations and applications have basically centered at the concept of “relative self-evaluation”, whether they are single or multi-stage applications. This paper suggests a framework for enhancing the theory of DEA through employing the concept of “relative cross-evaluation” in a multi-stage application context. Managerial situations are described where such enhanced-DEA (E-DEA) formulations had actually been used and could also be potentially most meaningful and useful.     

Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis

This paper proposes a dynamic data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to measure the system and period efficiencies at the same time for multi-period systems, where quasi-fixed inputs or intermediate products are the source of inter-temporal dependence between consecutive periods. A mathematical relationship is derived in which the complement of the system efficiency is a linear combination of those of the period efficiencies. The proposed model is also more discriminative than the existing ones in identifying the systems with better performance. Taiwanese forests, where the forest stock plays the role of quasi-fixed input, are used to illustrate this approach. The results show that the method for calculating the system efficiency in the literature produces over-estimated scores when the dynamic nature is ignored. This makes it necessary to conduct a dynamic analysis whenever data is available.     

Sensitivity and stability analysis in data envelopment analysis

One of the topics of interest in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is sensitivity and stability and stability analysis of the specific decision making unit (DMU), which is under evaluation. In DEA, efficient DMUs are of primary importance as they define the efficient frontier. In this paper, we develop a new sensitivity analysis approach for the CCR, BCC and Additive models, when variations in the data are considered for a specific efficient DMU and the data for the remaining DMUs are assumed fixed.     

Qualitative and quantitative data envelopment analysis with interval data

In this paper, we investigate DEA with interval input-output data. First we show various extensions of efficiency and that 25 of them are essential. Second we formulate the efficiency test problems as mixed integer programming problems. We prove that 14 among 25 problems can be reduced to linear programming problems and that the other 11 efficiencies can be tested by solving a finite sequence of linear programming problems. Third, in order to obtain efficiency scores, we extend SBM model to interval input-output data. Fourth, to moderate a possible positive overassessment by DEA, we introduce the inverted DEA model with interval input-output data. Using efficiency and inefficiency scores, we propose a classification of DMUs. Finally, we apply the proposed approach to Japanese Bank Data and demonstrate its advantages.     

Generalizing cross redundancy in data envelopment analysis

Lee and Choi (2010) proved that a cross redundant output in a CCR or BCC DEA study is unnecessary and can be eliminated from the model without affecting the results of the study. A cross redundant output, as characterized by Lee and Choi, can be expressed as a specially constrained linear combination of both some outputs and some inputs. This article extends the contributions of Lee and Choi (2010) in at least three ways: (i) by adding precision and clarity to some of their definitions; (ii) by introducing specific definitions that complement the ones in their paper; and (iii) by conducting some additional analysis on the impact of the presence of other types of linear dependencies among the inputs and outputs of a DEA model. One reason that it is important to identify and remove cross redundant inputs or outputs from DEA models is that the computational burden of the DEA study is decreased, especially in large applications.     

Modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis is a mathematical programming technique for identifying efficient frontiers for peer decision making units with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. These performance factors (inputs and outputs) are classified into two groups: desirable and undesirable. Obviously, undesirable factors in production process should be reduced to improve the performance. In the current paper, we present a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model in which can be used to improve the relative performance via increasing undesirable inputs and decreasing undesirable outputs.     

Dealing with interval scale data in data envelopment analysis

This paper considers the problem of interval scale data in the most widely used models of data envelopment analysis (DEA), the CCR and BCC models. Radial models require inputs and outputs measured on the ratio scale. Our focus is on how to deal with interval scale variables especially when the interval scale variable is a difference of two ratio scale variables like profit or the decrease/increase in bank accounts. We suggest the use of these ratio scale variables in a radial DEA model.