General communication schemes for multiobjective decision making

In this paper four general communication schemes for multiobjective decision making are presented. The procedures are completely general and make no presumptions about linearity or convexity. Nevertheless, improving bounds on the optimal value are available in each iterative step. Hereby, the procedures model the essential judgements to make and the necessary information to exchange between the decision maker and an analyst in order to make the communication progress. The procedures provide valuable theoretical insight. They also supply a framework for synthesizing known and developing new procedures.     

Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization

We introduce a new approach in the methodology development for interactive multiobjective optimization. The presentation is given in the context of the interactive NIMBUS method, where the solution process is based on the classification of objective functions. The idea is to formulate several scalarizing functions, all using the same preference information of the decision maker. Thus, opposed to fixing one scalarizing function (as is done in most methods), we utilize several scalarizing functions in a synchronous way. This means that we as method developers do not make the choice between different scalarizing functions but calculate the results of different scalarizing functions and leave the final decision to the expert, the decision maker. Simultaneously, (s)he obtains a better view of the solutions corresponding to her/his preferences expressed once during each iteration.In this paper, we describe a synchronous variant of the NIMBUS method. In addition, we introduce a new version of its implementation WWW-NIMBUS operating on the Internet. WWW-NIMBUS is a software system capable of solving even computationally demanding nonlinear problems. The new version of WWW-NIMBUS can handle versatile types of multiobjective optimization problems and includes new desirable features increasing its user-friendliness.     

IMGD: an interactive method for multiobjective group decision aid

Multiobjective methods for group decision situations that are proposed in the literature do not generally model power and influence. On the other hand, papers dealing with influence and power in group decision support system (GDSS) are looking for the effects of GDSS on the distribution of power among the group members. This paper proposes an interactive method for group decision aid in multiobjective context integrating the concept of power and influence within the multiperson–multicriteria aspect. The method is designed to be used by a committee to solve a multiple criteria allocation problem. The method is tested on a resource allocation problem in the Municipality of Tunis.     

A visual interactive approach for multiple criteria decision making with monotone utility functions

We consider the problem of choosing the best of a set of alternatives where each alternative is evaluated on multiple criteria. We develop a visual interactive approach assuming that the decision maker (DM) has a general monotone utility function. The approach partitions the criteria space into nonoverlapping cells. The DM uses various graphical aids to move between cells and to further manipulate selected cells with the goal of creating cells that have ideal points less preferred than an alternative. When the DM identifies such cells, all alternatives in those cells are eliminated from further consideration. The DM may also compare pairs of alternatives. The approach terminates with the most preferred alternative of the DM.     

An interactive procedure for linguistic multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information

In this paper, we consider the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems, in which the information about attribute weights is partly known and the attribute values are expressed in linguistic labels. We first define the concepts of linguistic positive ideal point, linguistic negative ideal point, and satisfactory degree of alternative. Based on these concepts, we then establish some linear programming models, through which the decision maker interacts with the analyst. Furthermore, we establish a practical interactive procedure for solving the MADM problems considered in this paper. The interactive process can be realized by giving and revising the satisfactory degrees of alternatives till an optimum satisfactory solution is achieved. Finally, a practical example is given to illustrate the developed procedure.     

Choice behavior in interactive multiple-criteria decision making

Choice behavior in an interactive multiple-criteria decision making environment is examined experimentally. A free search discrete visual interactive reference direction approach was used on a microcomputer by management students to solve two realistic and relevant multiple-criteria decision problems. The results revealed persistent patterns of intransitive choice behavior, and an unexpectedly rapid degree of convergence of the reference direction approach on a preferred solution. The results can be explained using Tversky' [20] additive utility difference model and Kahneman-Tversky's [5] prospect theory. The implications of the results for the design of interactive multiple-criteria decision procedures are discussed.     

An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making

Owing to the increasing complexity in various management, aggregating experts’ knowledge and experiences to make an appropriate decision is an important research area. However, with aggregation of information in decision process, some information may be lost. The aim of this paper is to present a systematic methodology avoiding information loss for group decision making. An extended TOPSIS method is twice used to the current method, which is first used to determine the weights of decision makers, and second used to rank the preference order of alternatives. The proposed approach is straightforward and has no aggregation of information. A comparison of proposed method with other methods is also done. Finally, a numerical example for supplier selection is given to illustrate the application of the introduced method.     

An efficient decision making approach in incomplete soft set

Zou et al. (2008) [21] presented weighted-average of all possible choice values approach of soft sets under incomplete information system in decision making. However, the approach is hard to understand and involves a great amount of computation. In order to simplify the approach, we present the simplified probability to directly instead of the incomplete information, and demonstrate the equivalence between the weighted-average of all possible choice values approach and the simplified probability approach. Finally, comparison results show that the proposed approach involves relatively less computation and is easier to implement and understand as compared with the weighted-average of all possible choice values approach.     

Multiple criteria decision making with interactive over-achievement programming

Whereas in goal programming the under-achievement with respect to (usually) unattainable goals are minimized, we propose the maximization of the over-achievements with respect to feasible goals or required values. An interactive algorithm, in which the over-achievements are maximized via a barrier function, is presented to implement the proposed approach.     

Planning federal public investment in Mexico using multiobjective decision making

The scope of this article is showing how multicriteria decision making can be anefficient tool to manage public investment planning in complex situations. Forthis aim, we will analyse the problem in all its aspects: building the modelfrom data using econometrical tools, solving the resulting highly complex modelusing modern efficient techniques (multiobjective meta-heuristics) and helpingthe decision maker to introduce his preferences in order to achieve the mostpreferred solution. This holistic approach let us provide an efficient solutionto a complex public investment planning situation, improving the current stateof the country relating not only economical aspects, but also social and humandevelopment aspects. The real situation studied is focused on Mexico, where, inrecent decades, has undergone remarkable improvements in terms of economicgrowth, which has not been matched by significant improvements in several otherbasic aspects of human development, nor by reductions in regional inequalities.This suggests the need to establish policies aimed at improving these aspectsand reducing inequalities. Federal public investment is an important tool inregional policy to promote and improve these aspects; so we introduce amultiobjective programming problem for planning federal public investment inMexico. This model will focus on improving national levels in four maindimensions of human development (economic growth, education, health andhousing), and on reducing regional inequalities for those dimensions.     

An adjustable approach to fuzzy soft set based decision making

Molodtsov’s soft set theory was originally proposed as a general mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainty. Recently, decision making based on (fuzzy) soft sets has found paramount importance. This paper aims to give deeper insights into decision making based on fuzzy soft sets. We discuss the validity of the Roy-Maji method and show its true limitations. We point out that the choice value designed for the crisp case is no longer fit to solve decision making problems involving fuzzy soft sets. By means of level soft sets, we present an adjustable approach to fuzzy soft set based decision making and give some illustrative examples. Moreover, the weighted fuzzy soft set is introduced and its application to decision making is also investigated.     

Dynamic decision making without expected utility: An operational approach

Non-expected utility theories, such as rank dependent utility (RDU) theory, have been proposed as alternative models to EU theory in decision making under risk. These models do not share the separability property of expected utility theory. This implies that, in a decision tree, if the reduction of compound lotteries assumption is made (so that preferences at each decision node reduce to RDU preferences among lotteries) and that preferences at different decision nodes are identical (same utility function and same weighting function), then the preferences are not dynamically consistent; in particular, the sophisticated strategy, i.e., the strategy generated by a standard rolling back of the decision tree, is likely to be dominated w.r.t. stochastic dominance. Dynamic consistency of choices remains feasible, and the decision maker can avoid dominated choices, by adopting a non-consequentialist behavior, with his choices in a subtree possibly depending on what happens in the rest of the tree. We propose a procedure which: (i) although adopting a non-consequentialist behavior, involves a form of rolling back of the decision tree; (ii) selects a non-dominated strategy that realizes a compromise between the decision maker’s discordant goals at the different decision nodes. Relative to the computations involved in the standard expected utility evaluation of a decision problem, the main computational increase is due to the identification of non-dominated strategies by linear programming. A simulation, using the rank dependent utility criterion, confirms the computational tractability of the model.     

An interactive dynamic approach based on hybrid swarm optimization for solving multiobjective programming problem with fuzzy parameters

Real engineering design problems are generally characterized by the presence of many often conflicting and incommensurable objectives. Naturally, these objectives involve many parameters whose possible values may be assigned by the experts. The aim of this paper is to introduce a hybrid approach combining three optimization techniques, dynamic programming (DP), genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization (PSO). Our approach integrates the merits of both DP and artificial optimization techniques and it has two characteristic features. Firstly, the proposed algorithm converts fuzzy multiobjective optimization problem to a sequence of a crisp nonlinear programming problems. Secondly, the proposed algorithm uses H-SOA for solving nonlinear programming problem. In which, any complex problem under certain structure can be solved and there is no need for the existence of some properties rather than traditional methods that need some features of the problem such as differentiability and continuity. Finally, with different degree of α we get different α-Pareto optimal solution of the problem. A numerical example is given to illustrate the results developed in this paper.     

Multiplicative decision rules for multiobjective decision problems

Properties of consistency of general decision rules for multiobjective decision problems are discussed. Decision rules based on the family of weighted geometric averages are introduced, their properties are analysed and possible implementations are discussed.     

An adjustable approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making

Molodtsov initiated the concept of soft set theory, which can be used as a generic mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainty. There has been some progress concerning practical applications of soft set theory, especially the use of soft sets in decision making. In this paper we generalize the adjustable approach to fuzzy soft sets based decision making. Concretely, we present an adjustable approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making by using level soft sets of intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and give some illustrative examples. The properties of level soft sets are presented and discussed. Moreover, we also introduce the weighted intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and investigate its application to decision making.     

Decision making in multiobjective optimization aided by the multicriteria tournament decision method

This paper proposes a new method for multicriteria analysis, named Multicriteria Tournament Decision (MTD). It provides the ranking of alternatives from best to worst, according to the preferences of a human decision-maker (DM). It has some positive aspects such as: it has a simple algorithm with intuitive appeal; it involves few input parameters (just the importance weight of each criterion).The helpfulness of MTD is demonstrated by using it to select the final solution of multiobjective optimization problems in an a posteriori decision making approach. Having at hand a discrete approximation of the Pareto front (provided by a multiobjective evolutionary search algorithm), the choice of the preferred Pareto-optimal solution is performed using MTD.A simple method, named Gain Analysis method (GAM), for verifying the existence of a better solution (a solution associated to higher marginal rates of return) than the one originally chosen by the DM, is also introduced here. The usefulness of MTD and GAM methods is confirmed by the suitable results shown in this paper.     

Decision making in multiobjective optimization aided by the multicriteria tournament decision method

This paper proposes a new method for multicriteria analysis, named Multicriteria Tournament Decision (MTD). It provides the ranking of alternatives from best to worst, according to the preferences of a human decision-maker (DM). It has some positive aspects such as: it has a simple algorithm with intuitive appeal; it involves few input parameters (just the importance weight of each criterion).The helpfulness of MTD is demonstrated by using it to select the final solution of multiobjective optimization problems in an a posteriori decision making approach. Having at hand a discrete approximation of the Pareto front (provided by a multiobjective evolutionary search algorithm), the choice of the preferred Pareto-optimal solution is performed using MTD.A simple method, named Gain Analysis method (GAM), for verifying the existence of a better solution (a solution associated to higher marginal rates of return) than the one originally chosen by the DM, is also introduced here. The usefulness of MTD and GAM methods is confirmed by the suitable results shown in this paper.