Role of attention in overshoot: frequency certainty versus uncertainty

Overshoot, the elevation in the threshold for a brief signal that comes on close to masker onset, was measured with signal frequency certain (same frequency on every trial) or uncertain (randomized over trials). In broadband noise, thresholds were higher 2 ms after masker onset than 200 ms later, by 9 dB with frequency certainty, by 6-7 dB with uncertainty. In narrowband noise centered on the signal frequency, thresholds at 2 ms were not elevated with certainty, but were elevated 4-5 dB with uncertainty. Thus, frequency uncertainty leads to less overshoot in broadband noise, to more overshoot in narrowband noise. Reduced overshoot in broadband noise may come about because the masker, given its many frequencies, disrupts focusing at onset as much under certainty as uncertainty. Once the initial disruption dissipates, threshold is lower with certainty so overshoot is greater. In contrast, a narrowband noise with frequencies only near the signal does not disrupt focusing when the signal frequency is known beforehand, so overshoot is absent. When frequency is uncertain, the narrowband noise serves to focus attention on the signal frequency; as this requires time, detection near noise onset is poorer than later on, so overshoot is present.     

Cuing effects for informational masking

The detection of a tone added to a random-frequency, multitone masker can be very poor even when the maskers have little energy in the frequency region of the signal. This paper examines the effects of adding a pretrial cue to reduce uncertainty for the masker or the signal. The first two experiments examined the effect of cuing a fixed-frequency signal as the number of masker components and presentation methods were manipulated. Cue effectiveness varied across observers, but could reduce thresholds by as much as 20 dB. Procedural comparisons indicated observers benefited more from having two masker samples to compare, with or without a signal cue, than having a single interval with one masker sample and a signal cue. The third experiment used random-frequency signals and compared no-cue, signal-cue, and masker-cue conditions, and also systematically varied the time interval between cue offset and trial onset. Thresholds with a cued random-frequency signal remained higher than for a cued fixed-frequency signal. For time intervals between the cue and trial of 50 ms or longer, thresholds were approximately the same with a signal or a masker cue and lower than when there was no cue. Without a cue or with a masker cue, analyses of possible decision strategies suggested observers attended to the potential signal frequencies, particularly the highest signal frequency. With a signal cue, observers appeared to attend to the frequency of the subsequent signal.     

Duration discrimination of steady and gliding tones: a new method for estimating sensitivity to rate of change

Thresholds for the detection of differences in duration were measured in a two-alternative, forced-choice task for four types of signals, all centered at 2000 Hz: (1) sinusoids fixed in frequency and level; (2) sinusoids of fixed frequency whose level was swept up or down by 5 or 10 dB; (3) sinusoids of fixed level whose frequency was swept up or down by 100 Hz; and (4) sinusoids whose level was swept up or down by 10 dB and whose frequency was swept up or down by 100 Hz. For types (2)-(4), the direction of the sweeps was fixed within a run. The duration of the standard was either fixed at 750 ms or was varied randomly from trial to trial by up to +/- 7% about 750 ms. The duration of the comparison signal was initially 100 ms greater than that of the standard and was varied adaptively to determine threshold. The pattern of results was similar for all four subjects tested. Duration-discrimination thresholds for the signals that were swept in level and/or frequency were lower than those for the fixed signal, typically by 15-20 ms. This indicates that subjects were sensitive to the rate of change of frequency and/or level and could use this as a cue for duration discrimination. The Weber fraction for rate of change was estimated to be about 0.05-0.06 and was similar for changes in level and in frequency.     

Effect of masker-fringe onset asynchrony on overshoot (L)

The study examines how overshoot is influenced by masker-signal onset asynchrony when the masker contains frequencies above or below the signal frequency. Masked thresholds were measured for a 2-ms tone at 5 kHz. The measurements were made in a reference condition with a narrow center-band (CB) noise masker (4590-5464 Hz), and in conditions with either a low-fringe (1900-4590 Hz) or a high-fringe noise band (5500-11 000 Hz) added to the CB. The signal always came on 2 ms after the onset of the CB. The time interval, between fringe and signal onsets varied from -98 ms (signal onset before fringe onset) to +502 ms (signal onset after fringe onset). Results show that overshoot is largest, 8-11 dB, for a high fringe with onset occurring between 8 ms before the signal onset and 12 ms after it. Thus, pronounced overshoot is observed even when the high fringe is gated on after the signal's offset. Low fringes produce no more than 4 dB of overshoot, much less than high fringes produce. The finding of pronounced overshoot elicited by a high fringe presented shortly after the end of the signal suggests that overshoot is governed, at least in part, by central mechanisms.     

Effect of masker harmonicity on informational masking

Detection thresholds for a tone in an unfamiliar tonal pattern can be greatly elevated under conditions of masker uncertainty [Neff and Green, Percept. Psychophys. 41, 409-415 (1987); Oh and Lutfi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3148 (1997)]. The present experiment was undertaken to determine whether harmonicity of masker tones can reduce the detrimental effect of masker uncertainty. Inharmonic maskers were comprised of m=2-49 frequency components selected at random on each presentation within 100-10000 Hz, excluding frequencies between 920-1080. Harmonic maskers were comprised of frequency components selected at random within this same range, but constrained to have a fundamental frequency of 200 Hz. For inharmonic maskers the signal was a 1000-Hz tone. For harmonic-maskers the signal was a tone whose frequency was either harmonically (1000 Hz) or inharmonically (1047 Hz) related to the masker. In all conditions the amount of masking was greatest for m = 20-40 components. At this point, harmonic maskers with harmonic signal produced an average of 9-12 dB less masking than inharmonic maskers. Harmonic maskers with inharmonic signal produced an average of 16-20 dB less masking.     

Effects of ipsilateral and contralateral precursors on the temporal effect in simultaneous masking with pure tones

In tone-on-tone masking, thresholds often decrease as the onset of the signal is delayed relative to the onset of the masker, especially when the frequency of the masker is higher than the frequency of the signal. This temporal effect was studied here by using a tonal "precursor," whose offset preceded the onset of the tonal masker (and signal). Under the right conditions, the precursor can reduce or eliminate the temporal effect by decreasing the threshold for a signal at masker onset, presumably for the same reason that the threshold decreases as a signal is delayed relative to the onset of a masker. In the present study, the frequency of the signal was 4000 Hz, and the frequency of the masker and precursor was typically 5000 Hz. In experiment 1, the precursor was presented to the ear receiving the masker and signal (ipsilateral precursor); in experiment 2, it was presented to the opposite ear (contralateral precursor). The results from experiment 1 can be summarized as follows: the ipsilateral precursor (a) reaches its maximum effectiveness (in reducing the temporal effect) for precursor durations of 200-400 ms; (b) is ineffective once the delay between its offset and the onset of the masker reaches about 50-100 ms; (c) is generally ineffective when its level is 10 or more dB lower than the level of the masker, but is effective when its level is equal to or greater than the level of the masker; and (d) becomes progressively less effective as its frequency is either increased or decreased relative to the frequency of the masker. The results from experiment 2 can be summarized simply by stating that the contralateral precursor is ineffective in reducing the temporal effect. These results suggest that the effect of the precursor may be mediated peripherally.     

Lateralization based on interaural phase differences: effects of frequency, amplitude, duration, and shape of rise/decay

Experiments in lateralization were performed to evaluate the relative contribution of envelope and phase cues in binaural hearing with particular reference to the effects of frequency, amplitude, shape of rise/decay, and duration of peak amplitude. Pure-tone signals were presented with interaural phase shifts ranging between 90 degrees and 360 degrees. For a given value of phase shift, the leading signal was presented randomly to the right or left ear over a block of 100 trials, and the laterality of the resultant image was judged. Rise/decay time was varied from 5 to 200 ms across blocks. The results confirmed our previous finding that a rise/decay time of at least 200 ms is required to secure a psychophysically steady-state signal. This value will, however, depend on the values chosen for the other signal parameters. Within limits, decreasing intensity could be compensated for by decreasing rise/decay, suggesting the psychophysical importance of the initial segment of the signal (precedence effect). For low frequencies of 650 to 1250 Hz, performance is sensitive to interaural phase shift and largely independent of frequency. For higher frequencies of 1500 and 2000 Hz, lateralization is independent of the phase cue and also largely insensitive to change in rise/decay time. Finally, performance remains unchanged with variation in peak duration ranging from 25 to 200 ms.     

Asymmetry of masking between noise and iterated rippled noise: evidence for time-interval processing in the auditory system.

This study describes the masking asymmetry between noise and iterated rippled noise (IRN) as a function of spectral region and the IRN delay. Masking asymmetry refers to the fact that noise masks IRN much more effectively than IRN masks noise, even when the stimuli occupy the same spectral region. Detection thresholds for IRN masked by noise and for noise masked by IRN were measured with an adaptive two-alternative, forced choice (2AFC) procedure with signal level as the adaptive parameter. Masker level was randomly varied within a 10-dB range in order to reduce the salience of loudness as a cue for detection. The stimuli were filtered into frequency bands, 2.2-kHz wide, with lower cutoff frequencies ranging from 0.8 to 6.4 kHz. IRN was generated with 16 iterations and with varying delays. The reciprocal of the delay was 16, 32, 64, or 128 Hz. When the reciprocal of the IRN delay was within the pitch range, i.e., above 30 Hz, there was a substantial masking asymmetry between IRN and noise for all filter cutoff frequencies; threshold for IRN masked by noise was about 10 dB larger than threshold for noise masked by IRN. For the 16-Hz IRN, the masking asymmetry decreased progressively with increasing filter cutoff frequency, from about 9 dB for the lowest cutoff frequency to less than 1 dB for the highest cutoff frequency. This suggests that masking asymmetry may be determined by different cues for delays within and below the pitch range. The fact that masking asymmetry exists for conditions that combine very long IRN delays with very high filter cutoff frequencies means that it is unlikely that models based on the excitation patterns of the stimuli would be successful in explaining the threshold data. A range of time-domain models of auditory processing that focus on the time intervals in phase-locked neural activity patterns is reviewed. Most of these models were successful in accounting for the basic masking asymmetry between IRN and noise for conditions within the pitch range, and one of the models produced an exceptionally good fit to the data.     

Factors affecting thresholds for sinusoidal signals in narrow-band maskers with fluctuating envelopes

When a signal is higher in frequency than a narrow-band masker, thresholds are lower when the masker envelope fluctuates than when it is constant. This article investigates the cues used to achieve the lower thresholds, and the factors that influence the amount of threshold reduction. In experiment I the masker was either a sinusoid (constant envelope) or a pair of equal-amplitude sinusoids (fluctuating envelope) centered at the same frequency as the single sinusoid (250, 1000, 3000, or 5275 Hz). The signal frequency was 1.8 times the masker frequency. At all center frequencies, thresholds were lower for the two-tone masker than for the sinusoidal masker, but the effect was smaller at the highest and lowest frequencies. The reduced effect at high frequencies is attributed to the loss of a cue related to phase locking in the auditory nerve. The reduced effect at low frequencies can be partly explained by reduced slopes of the growth-of-masking functions. In experiment II the masker was a sinusoid amplitude modulated at an 8-Hz rate. Masker and signal frequencies were the same as for the first experiment. Randomizing the modulation depth between the two halves of a forced-choice trial had no effect on thresholds, indicating that changes in modulation depth are not used as a cue for signal detection. Thresholds in the modulated masker were higher than would be predicted if they were determined only by the masker level at minima in the envelope, and the threshold reduction produced by modulating the master envelope was less at 250 Hz than at higher frequencies. Experiments III and IV reveal two factors that contribute to the reduced release from masking at low frequencies: The rate of increase of masked threshold with decreasing duration is greater at 250 Hz than at 1000 Hz; the amount of forward masking, relative to simultaneous masking, is greater at 250 Hz than at 1000 Hz. The results are discussed in terms of the relative importance of across-channel cues and within-channel cues.     

Forward masking of amplitude modulation: basic characteristics

In this study we demonstrate an effect for amplitude modulation (AM) that is analogous to forward making of audio frequencies, i.e., the modulation threshold for detection of AM (signal) is raised by preceding AM (masker). In the study we focused on the basic characteristics of the forward-masking effect. Functions representing recovery from AM forward masking measured with a 150- ms 40- Hz masker AM and a 50- ms signal AM of the same rate imposed on the same broadband-noise carrier, showed an exponential decay of forward masking with increasing delay from masker offset. Thresholds remained elevated by more than 2 dB over an interval of at least 150 ms following the masker. Masked-threshold patterns, measured with a fixed signal rate (20, 40, and 80 Hz) and a variable masker rate, showed tuning of the AM forward-masking effect. The tuning was approximately constant across signal modulation rates used and consistent with the idea of modulation-rate selective channels. Combining two equally effective forward maskers of different frequencies did not lead to an increase in forward masking relative to that produced by either component alone. Overall, the results are consistent with modulation-rate selective neural channels that adapt and recover from the adaptation relatively quickly.     

Listening bandwidths and frequency uncertainty in pure-tone signal detection

The effect of frequency uncertainty on the detection of tonal signals in noise was studied using a modified probe-signal method. Widths of the listening bands used during detection were measured directly, allowing for an analysis that separates the effects of having to monitor multiple independent bands from those due to limited frequency resolution. Uncertainty was varied by beginning each trial with a cue consisting of one, two, or four randomly chosen, simultaneously presented tones. An expected signal, whose frequency matched one of the components in a cue, was presented on a majority of trials. However, on remaining trials, the signal was a probe, which meant that its frequency differed from one of the components in the cue by a constant ratio. Performance as measured in percent correct declined for probes at increasingly distant ratios from the expected values. The results were converted to dB using individual psychometric functions for expected signals and listening bands were fitted using the rounded exponential filter of Patterson et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 1788-1803 (1982)]. The obtained bandwidths are comparable to those reported using notched-noise maskers, but there is a small but consistent increase in bandwidth with increased numbers of components in the cues. The primary results is that the effects due to uncertainty are well described by a 1-of-M orthogonal band model, which takes into consideration limitations of the detector, including the widths of the listening bands.     

Effects of level and frequency on the audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones

The effect of level and frequency on the audibility of partials was measured for complex tones with partials uniformly spaced on an equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB(N)) number scale. On each trial, subjects heard a sinusoidal "probe" followed by a complex tone. The probe was mistuned downwards or upwards (at random) by 4.5% from the frequency of one randomly selected partial in the complex. The subject indicated whether the probe was higher or lower in frequency than the nearest partial in the complex. The frequencies were roved from trial to trial, keeping frequency ratios fixed. In experiment 1, the level per partial, L, was 40 or 70 dB SPL and the mean frequency of the central partial, f(c), was 1201 Hz. Scores for the highest and lowest partials in the complexes were generally high for all spacings. Scores for the inner partials were close to chance at 0.75-ERB(N) spacing, and improved as the spacing was increased up to 2 ERB(N). For intermediate spacings, performance was better for the lower level used. In experiment 2, L was 70 dB SPL and f(c) was 3544 Hz. Performance worsened markedly for partial frequencies above 3544 Hz, consistent with a role of phase locking.     

Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers

The threshold for a signal masked by a narrow band of noise centered at the signal frequency (the on-frequency band) may be reduced by adding to the masker a second band of noise (the flanking band) whose envelope is correlated with that of the first band, an effect called comodulation masking release (CMR). This paper examines CMR as a function of masker bandwidth and time delay between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. The 1.0-kHz sinusoidal signal had a duration of 400 ms. The on-frequency band was presented alone (reference condition) or with the flanking band. The flanking-band envelope was either correlated or uncorrelated with that of the on-frequency band. Flanking-band center frequencies ranged from 0.25-2.0 kHz. The flanking band was presented either in the same ear as the on-frequency band (monaural condition) or in the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The noise bands had bandwidths of 6.25, 25, or 100 Hz. In the correlated conditions, the flanking-band envelope was delayed with respect to that of the on-frequency band by 0, 5, 10, or 20 ms. For the 100-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were small (typically less than 1 dB) in both monaural and dichotic conditions at all delay times. For the 25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs were about 3.5 dB for the 0-ms delay, and decreased to about 1.5 dB for the 20-ms delay. For the 6.25-Hz bandwidth, CMRs averaged about 5 dB and were almost independent of delay time. The results suggest that the absolute delay time is not the critical variable determining CMR. The magnitude of CMR appears to depend on the correlation between the envelopes of the on-frequency and flanking bands. However, the results do not support a model of CMR that assumes that signal threshold corresponds to a constant change in across-band envelope correlation when the correlation is transformed to Fisher's z.     

Comodulation masking release in a forward-masking paradigm

Waveforms that yield comodulation masking release (CMR) when they are presented simultaneously with a signal were used in a standard forward-masking procedure. The signal was a 25-ms sample of a 2500-Hz tone. The masker was a band of noise centered at 2500 Hz, 100 Hz in width, and 200 ms in duration. Presented with the masker were two or four cue bands, each 100 Hz wide and centered at various distances from the masker band. These cue bands either all had the same temporal envelope as the masker band (correlated condition) or their common envelope was different from that of the masker band (uncorrelated condition). In the initial experiments, (1) detectability of the tonal signal was 7-18 dB better when the masker band was accompanied by cue bands than when it was not--an effect that would be expected from past research on lateral suppression--but further, (2) the signal was about 3 dB more detectable in the correlated conditions than in the uncorrelated conditions. In follow-up experiments, these CMR-like differences between the correlated and uncorrelated conditions were substantially reduced (although not eliminated) by presenting a contralateral, wideband noise that was gated synchronously with the masker and/or cue bands. The implications are that the initial results were attributable in part to the "confusion effects" known to exist in certain temporal-masking situations, and that listeners are able to obtain greater information about the temporal extent of a masker band from correlated cue bands than from uncorrelated bands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: Sex and race differences

Both distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and performance in an auditory-masking task involving combination tones were measured in the same frequency region in the same ears. In the behavioral task, a signal of 3.6?kHz (duration 300?ms, rise/fall time 20?ms) was masked by a 3.0-kHz tone (62?dB SPL, continuously presented). These two frequencies can produce a combination tone at 2.4?kHz. When a narrowband noise (2.0-2.8?kHz, 17?dB spectrum level) was added as a second masker, detection of the 3.6-kHz signal worsened by 6-9?dB (the Greenwood effect), revealing that listeners had been using the combination tone at 2.4?kHz as a cue for detection at 3.6?kHz. Several outcomes differed markedly by sex and racial background. The Greenwood effect was substantially larger in females than in males, but only for the White group. When the magnitude of the Greenwood effect was compared with the magnitude of the DPOAE measured in the 2.4?kHz region, the correlations typically were modest, but were high for Non-White males. For many subjects, then, most of the DPOAE measured in the ear canal apparently is not related to the combination-tone cue that is masked by the narrowband noise.     

Temporal integration in the presence of off-frequency maskers

Temporal integration was measured at a relatively low and a relatively high signal frequency under conditions of off-frequency masking. The masker was typically gated for 300 ms, and the signal was presented 70 ms after masker onset. In experiment 1, the signal frequency was 500 or 2000 Hz. Temporal integration was measured in quiet and in the presence of a masker whose frequency was lower or higher than the signal frequency. In all listening situations, there was less integration at 2000 Hz than at 500 Hz. This effect of frequency was particularly dramatic in the presence of a lower frequency masker, where there was almost no integration at 2000 Hz. Experiment 2 showed that this dramatic effect of frequency cannot be understood in terms of the underlying psychometric functions. Experiment 3 measured temporal integration at 750 and 2000 Hz for a large number of masker-signal frequency separations for both a tonal and a noise masker, and in conditions where the masker was gated or continuous. The results with the gated tonal masker largely confirmed the results of experiment 1. The results with the continuous tonal masker and the gated or continuous noise masker, however, were quite different. In those cases, the amount of temporal integration at both signal frequencies was more or less independent of the masker-signal separation; the masked temporal integration was nearly equal to the integration in quiet. Thus based on the conditions evaluated here, off-frequency masked temporal integration differs substantially from integration in quiet only for gated tonal maskers located considerably lower in frequency than the signal. It is unclear how to account for this finding, although it may be related to attentional factors.     

Effect of masker level on overshoot

Overshoot refers to the phenomenon where signal detectability improves for a short-duration signal as the onset of that signal is delayed relative to the onset of a longer duration masker. A popular explanation for overshoot is that it reflects short-term adaptation in auditory-nerve fibers. In this study, overshoot was measured for a 10-ms, 4-kHz signal masked by a broadband noise. In the first experiment, masker duration was 400 ms and signal onset delay was 1 or 195 ms; masker spectrum level ranged from - 10-50 dB SPL. Overshoot was negligible at the lowest masker levels, grew to about 10-15 dB at the moderate masker levels, but declined and approached 0 dB at the highest masker levels. In the second experiment, the masker duration was reduced to 100 ms, and the signal was presented with a delay of 1 or 70 ms; masker spectrum level was 10, 30, or 50 dB SPL. Overshoot was about 10 dB for the two lower masker levels, but about 0 dB at the highest masker level. The results from the second experiment suggest that the decline in overshoot at high masker levels is probably not due to auditory fatigue. It is suggested, instead, that the decline may be attributable to the neural response at high levels being dominated by those auditory-nerve fibers that do not exhibit short-term adaptation (i.e., those with low spontaneous rates and high thresholds).     

Effects of pure-tone forward masker duration on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity

The effects of forward masker duration on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity were investigated in two experiments. In both experiments, masker duration was 50 or 400 ms, signal duration was 20 ms, and there was no delay between masker offset and signal onset. In the first experiment, growth-of-masking functions were measured for a masker whose frequency was below, at, or above the 1000-Hz signal frequency. From those data, input filter patterns (IFPs) were plotted for masker levels from 40-90 dB SPL. In the second experiment, masking patterns (MPs) were measured for a 1000-Hz masker presented at 50, 70, and 90 dB SPL. Both measures of frequency selectivity (IFPs and MPs) indicate that frequency selectivity is greater for the 400-ms masker. These data suggest that there may be a sharpening of frequency selectivity with time at a stage prior to the adaptation observed in forward masking.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration

These experiments examine how comodulation masking release (CMR) varies with masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a 400-ms, 2000-Hz signal masked by continuous noise varying in bandwidth from 50-3200 Hz in 1-oct steps. In one condition, using random noise maskers, thresholds increased with increasing bandwidth up to 400 Hz and then remained approximately constant. In another set of conditions, the masker was multiplied (amplitude modulated) by a low-pass noise (bandwidth varied from 12.5-400 Hz in 1-oct steps). This produced correlated envelope fluctuations across frequency. Thresholds were generally lower than for random noise maskers with the same bandwidth. For maskers less than one critical band wide, the release from masking was largest (about 5 dB) for maskers with low rates of modulation (12.5-Hz-wide low-pass modulator). It is argued that this release from masking is not a "true" CMR but results from a within-channel cue. For broadband maskers (greater than 400 Hz), the release from masking increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreasing modulator bandwidth, reaching an asymptote of 12 dB for a masker bandwidth of 800 Hz and a modulator bandwidth of 50 Hz. Most of this release from masking can be attributed to a CMR. In experiment 2, the modulator bandwidth was fixed at 12.5 Hz and the signal duration was varied. For masker bandwidths greater than 400 Hz, the CMR decreased from 12 to 5 dB as the signal duration was decreased from 400 to 25 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Absence of overshoot in a dichotic masking condition

Brief tonal signals presented soon after the onset of a masking noise are known to be less detectable than signals delayed by several hundred milliseconds. This difference in detectability is known as the "overshoot." Signals of two sorts were studied here--either interaurally in phase (S o) or interaurally out of phase by 180 degrees (S pi). When S omicron signals of 750 Hz and about 14 ms in duration were presented 4 ms after the onset of a diotic, broadband masking noise (N o), detectability was about 6 dB worse than when the signal was presented 325 ms after onset. By contrast, there was no such overshoot when S pi signals were presented at varying times after masker onset; detectability was about the same for all values of signal delay. Accordingly, the difference in performance between N o S o and N o S pi--the masking-level difference or MLD--was large (about 16 dB) with the shortest delays used and diminished (to about 9 dB) as the delay was increased. This absence of overshoot with the S pi signals is in accord with the well-established view that detectability in the dichotic masking conditions is based upon different stimulus information from that used in the diotic masking conditions. Specifically, the evidence confirms the common view that detectability in the diotic conditions is based more or less directly on neural firing rate, whereas, in the dichotic conditions, it is based upon interaural time differences encoded in the periodicity of neural firings.