A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process

The DEAHP method for weight deviation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been found flawed and sometimes produces counterintuitive priority vectors for inconsistent pairwise comparison matrices, which makes its application very restrictive. This paper proposes a new data envelopment analysis (DEA) method for priority determination in the AHP and extends it to the group AHP situation. In this new DEA methodology, two specially constructed DEA models that differ from the DEAHP model are used to derive the best local priorities from a pairwise comparison matrix or a group of pairwise comparison matrices no matter whether they are perfectly consistent or inconsistent. The new DEA method produces true weights for perfectly consistent pairwise comparison matrices and the best local priorities that are logical and consistent with decision makers (DMs)’ subjective judgments for inconsistent pairwise comparison matrices. In hierarchical structures, the new DEA method utilizes the simple additive weighting (SAW) method for aggregation of the best local priorities without the need of normalization. Numerical examples are examined throughout the paper to show the advantages of the new DEA methodology and its potential applications in both the AHP and group decision making.     

A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process

In this paper, we propose a method to modify a given comparison matrix, by which the consistency ratio (CR) value of the modified matrix is less than that of the original one, and give an algorithm to derive a positive reciprocal matrix with acceptable consistency (i.e., CR < 0.1), then the convergence theorem for the given algorithm is established and its practicality is shown by some examples.     

Geometry of decision making and the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process

We extend the conventional Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to an Euclidean vector space and develop formulations for aggregation of the alternative preferences with the criteria preferences. Relative priorities obtained from such a formulation are almost identical with the ones obtained using conventional AHP. Each decision is represented by a preference vector indicating the orientation of the decision maker's mind in the decision space spanned by the decision alternatives. This adds a geometric meaning to the decision making processes. We utilise the measure of similarity between any two decision makers and apply it for analysing decisions in a homogeneous group. We propose an aggregation scheme for calculating the group preference from individual preferences using a simple vector addition procedure that satisfies Pareto optimality condition. The results agree very well with the ones of conventional AHP.     

A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process

The estimation of the priorities from pairwise comparison matrices is the major constituent of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The priority vector can be derived from these matrices using different techniques, as the most commonly used are the Eigenvector Method (EVM) and the Logarithmic Least Squares Method (LLSM). In this paper a new Fuzzy Programming Method (FPM) is proposed, based on geometrical representation of the prioritisation process. This method transforms the prioritisation problem into a fuzzy programming problem that can easily be solved as a standard linear programme. The FPM is compared with the main existing prioritisation methods in order to evaluate its performance. It is shown that it possesses some attractive properties and could be used as an alternative to the known prioritisation methods, especially when the preferences of the decision-maker are strongly inconsistent.     

Some applications of the analytic hierarchy process

In this paper we describe our experience using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in the evaluation of drug effectiveness in medicine, wine tasting and tea production, selection of team members in sports, forecasting in the industrial sector and service and trade. Each of the applications presented involves the quantification of qualitative information.     

A new macroeconomic forecasting and policy evaluation method using the analytic hierarchy process

The Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to show how forecasts can be made of the effects of monetarist, Keynesian and supply-side macroeconomic policies and to determine their impact on important variables such as unemployment, inflation and GNP growth.     

The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review

This paper presents a literature review of the application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to important problems in medical and health care decision making. The literature is classified by year of publication, health care category, journal, method of analyzing alternatives, participants, and application type. Very few articles were published prior to 1988 and the level of activity has increased to about three articles per year since 1997. The 50 articles reviewed were classified in seven categories: diagnosis, patient participation, therapy/treatment, organ transplantation, project and technology evaluation and selection, human resource planning, and health care evaluation and policy. The largest number of articles was found in the project and technology evaluation and selection category (14) with substantial activity in patient participation (9), therapy/treatment (8), and health care evaluation and policy (8). The AHP appears to be a promising support tool for shared decision making between patient and doctor, evaluation and selection of therapies and treatments, and the evaluation of health care technologies and policies. We expect that AHP research will continue to be an important component of health care and medical research.     

Hilbert's metric and the analytic hierarchy process

This paper explores some of the properties of Hilbert's projective metric as a measure of closeness between two ratio scales in the context of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Smallperturbation arguments are used to contrast the sensitivity and the distributional behavior of this metric with the more traditional Euclidean distance function, in situations where the paired comparison of alternatives is subject to random perturbations, and priorities are estimated either by Saaty's eigenvalue method or by the logarithmic least squares principle. A pivotal property of Hilbert's metric has surfaced which allows for the construction of confidence regions for an underlying priority vector. These regions are seen to enjoy good coverage properties.     

Perturbation of analytic hermitian matrix functions

The behaviour of real eigenvalues of selfadjoint analytic matrix valued functions under small selfadjoint analytic perturbations is studied. Attention is paid mainly to the case when the perturbation is definite (or semidefi-nite). Earlier results of the authors concerning matrix polynomials of first degree are extended to the case of analytic functions.     

A Thurstonian view of the analytic hierarchy process

The application of deterministic decision models in situations characterized by noise and uncertainty is likely to produce results of questionable value. In this paper, some very simple probabilistic models are developed and substituted for the deterministic scales used in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). It is shown that the use of these probabilistic models can extend the domain of AHP to situations, such as consensual or group decision making, that possess significant amounts of uncertainty. In addition, explicit measures of the variation present in the evaluation of decision alternatives and attributes are obtained.     

On modeling dynamic priorities in the analytic hierarchy process using compositional data analysis

In a rapidly changing environment, the priorities derived using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach at one point in time might very likely change in the near future. Thus, in order to adapt to such ever-changing environment, it is of primary importance to be able to follow the change over time as to enable the system to respond differently and continuously over time of its operation. This paper proposes the use of a time-based compositional forecasting method, which is based on the idea of exponential smoothing, to deal with the AHP priority dynamics. The proposed method is particularly useful when there is a limited number of historical data, and might be considered to be more effective and time-efficient compared to that of multivariate time series method. It was also shown that the proposed method provides much greater adaptability in modeling the AHP priorities change over time compared to that of recently developed methods in compositional data research field. The shortcoming of Saaty’s dynamic judgment approach and some limitations of the other existing methods will be discussed. Finally, to substantiate the validity of the proposed method and to give some practical insights, an illustrative case study is provided.     

Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process

The Analytic Hierarchy Process is a decision-analysis tool which was developed by T.L. Saaty in the 1970s and which has been applied to many different decision problems in corporate, governmental and other institutional settings. The most successful applications have come about in group decisionmaking sessions, where the group structures the problem in a hierarchical framework and pairwise comparisons are elicited from the group for each level of the hierarchy. However, the number of pairwise comparison necessary in a real problem often becomes overwhelming. For example, with 9 alternatives and 5 criteria, the group must answer 190 questions. This paper explores various methods for reducing the complexity of the preference eliciting process. The theory of a method based upon the graph-theoretic structure of the pairwise comparison matrix and the gradient of the right Perron vector is developed, and simulations of a series of random matrices are used to illustrate the properties of this approach.     

A utility approach to the analytic hierarchy process

This paper attempts to examine the utility foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). It identifies the conditions under which the selection of an alternative is consistent with the maximization of an underlying utility function, or more precisely, the conditions under which the AHP-recommended choice corresponds with the solution attained from maximizing the respondent's utility function.     

Perturbation of the generating operator of an analytic semigroup

Voronezh Military Aviation Engineering Academy. Translated from Funktsional'nyi Analiz i Ego Prilozheniya, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 62–63, January–March, 1988.     

The analytic hierarchy process with stochastic judgements

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a widely-used method for multicriteria decision support based on the hierarchical decomposition of objectives, evaluation of preferences through pairwise comparisons, and a subsequent aggregation into global evaluations. The current paper integrates the AHP with stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA), an inverse-preference method, to allow the pairwise comparisons to be uncertain. A simulation experiment is used to assess how the consistency of judgements and the ability of the SMAA-AHP model to discern the best alternative deteriorates as uncertainty increases. Across a range of simulated problems results indicate that, according to conventional benchmarks, judgements are likely to remain consistent unless uncertainty is severe, but that the presence of uncertainty in almost any degree is sufficient to make the choice of best alternative unclear.     

Probabilistic judgments specified partially in the analytic hierarchy process

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision-making tool which yields priorities for decision alternatives. This paper proposes a new approach to elicit and synthesize expert assessments for the group decision process in the AHP. These new elicitations are given as partial probabilistic specifications of the entries of pairwise comparisons matrices. For a particular entry of the matrix, the partial probabilistic elicitations could arise in the form of either probability assignments regarding the chance of that entry falling in specified intervals or selected quantiles for that entry. A new class of models is introduced to provide methods for processing this partial probabilistic information. One advantage of this approach is that it allows to generate as many pairwise comparison matrices of the decision alternatives as one desires. This, in turn, allows us to determine the statistical significance of the priorities of decision alternatives.     

Using the analytic hierarchy process in a dynamic environment

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision analysis technique that uses judgements from a group of relevant decision makers along with hierarchical decomposition to derive a set of ratioscaled measures for decision alternatives. This paper addresses implementation issues for the AHP when the alternatives become available to the decision maker sequentially rather than simultaneously. Uncertainty about the value of future alternatives and the number of alternatives is included. We present a technique similar to the classic “secretary problem” of operations research and describe some sample results of using this technique. The procedure involves prioritizing criteria of possible alternatives before the alternatives became available, scoring the alternatives and then comparing the score of an alternative with an easily computed (through a dynamic programming recursion) critical value.     

The harmonic consistency index for the analytic hierarchy process

A new consistency measure, the harmonic consistency index, is obtained for any positive reciprocal matrix in the analytic hierarchy process. We show how this index varies with changes in any matrix element. A tight upper bound is provided for this new consistency measure when the entries of matrix are at most 9, as is often recommended. Using simulation, the harmonic consistency index is shown to give numerical values similar to the standard consistency index but it is easier to compute and interpret. In addition, new properties of the column sums of reciprocal matrices are obtained.     

The approach to consistency in the analytic hierarchy process

In his first book on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, T. L. Saaty left open several mathematical questions about the structure of the set of positive reciprocal matrices. In this paper we consider three of these questions: Given an eigenvector and all matrices which give rise to it, can one go from one of them to any order by making small perturbations in the entries? Given two positive column vectors v and w is there a perturbation which carries the set of all positive reciprocal matrices with principal right eigenvector v to the set of positive reciprocal matrices with principal right eigenvector w? Does the set of positive reciprocal n×n matrices whose left and right principal eigenvectors are reciprocals coincide with the set of consistent matrices for n⩾4?