Oligonucleosides with a Nucleobase‐Including Backbone,Part 4, A Convergent Synthesis of Ethynediyl‐Linked Adenosine Tetramers

Deprotection of the tetramer 24 , obtained by coupling the iodinated dimer 18 with the alkyne 23 gave the 8′,5‐ethynediyl‐linked adenosine‐derived tetramer 27 (Scheme 3). As direct iodination of C(5′)‐ethynylated adenosine derivatives failed, we prepared 18 via the 8‐amino derivative 17 that was available by coupling the imine 15 with the iodide 7 ; 15 , in its turn, was obtained from the 8‐chloro derivative 12 via the 4‐methoxybenzylamine 14 (Scheme 2). This method for the introduction of the 8‐iodo substituent was worked out with the N‐benzoyladenosine 1 that was transformed into the azide 2 by lithiation and treatment with tosyl azide (Scheme 1). Reduction of 2 led to the amine 3 that was transformed into 7 . 1,3‐Dipolar cycloaddition of 3 and (trimethylsilyl)acetylene gave 6 . The 8‐substituted derivatives 4a – d were prepared similarly to 2 , but could not be transformed into 7 . The known chloride 8 was transformed into the iodide 11 via the amines 9 and 10 . The amines 3 , 10 , and 16 form more or less completely persistent intramolecular C(8)N−H⋅⋅⋅O(5′) H‐bonds, while the dimeric amine 17 forms a ca. 50% persistent H‐bond. There is no UV evidence for a base‐base interaction in the protected and deprotected dimers and tetramers.     

Stereoselective Synthesis of [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐Hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐D‐valine]]‐ and [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐Hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐L‐valine]cyclosporin A

Addition of various amines to the 3,3‐bis(trifluoromethyl)acrylamides 10a and 10b gave the tripeptides 11a – 11f , mostly as mixtures of epimers (Scheme 3). The crystalline tripeptide 11f ₂ was found to be the N‐terminal (2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐substituted (R,S,S)‐ester HOCH₂CH₂O‐D ‐Val(F₆)‐MeLeu‐Ala‐O^tBu by X‐ray crystallography. The C‐terminal‐protected tripeptide 11f ₂ was condensed with the N‐terminus octapeptide 2b to the depsipeptide 12a which was thermally rearranged to the undecapeptide 13a (Scheme 4). The condensation of the epimeric tripeptide 11f ₁ with the octapeptide 2b gave the undecapeptide 13b directly. The undecapeptides 13a and 13b were fully deprotected and cyclized to the [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐D ‐valine]]‐ and [5‐[4,4,4,4′,4′,4′‐hexafluoro‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐L ‐valine]]cyclosporins 14a and 14b , respectively (Scheme 5). Rate differences observed for the thermal rearrangements of 12a to 13a and of 12b to 13b are discussed.     

Oligonucleosides with a Nucleobase‐Including Backbone,Part 1, Concept,Force‐Field Calculations,and Synthesis of Uridine‐Derived Monomers and Dimers

A new type of oligonucleosides has been devised to investigate the potential of oligonucleosides with a nucleobase‐including backbone to form homo‐ and/or heteroduplexes (cf. Fig. 2). It is characterised by ethynyl‐linkages between C(5′) and C(6) of uridine, and between C(5′) and C(8) of adenosine. Force‐field calculations and Maruzen model studies suggest that such oligonucleosides form autonomous pairing systems and hybridize with RNA. We describe the syntheses of uridine‐derived monomers, suitable for the construction of oligomers, and of a dimer. Treatment of uridine‐5′‐carbaldehyde ( 2 ) with triethylsilyl acetylide gave the diastereoisomeric propargylic alcohols 6 and 7 (1 : 2, 80%; Scheme 1). Their configuration at C(5′) was determined on the basis of NOE experiments and X‐ray crystal‐structure analysis. Iodination at C(6) of the (R)‐configured alcohol 7 by treatment with lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) and N‐iodosuccinimide (NIS) gave the iodide 17 (62%), which was silylated at O−C(5′) to yield 18 (89%; Scheme 2). C‐Desilylation of 7 with NaOH in MeOH/H₂O led to the alkyne 10 (98%); O‐silylation of 10 at O−C(5′) gave 16 (84%). Cross‐coupling of 18 and 16 yielded 63% of the dimer 19 , which was C‐desilylated to 20 in 63% yield. Cross‐coupling of 10 and the 6‐iodouridine 13 (70%), followed by treatment of the resulting dimer 14 with HF and HCl in MeCN/H₂O, gave the deprotected dimer 15 (73%).     

Synthesis of (±)‐Glaucine and (±)‐Neospirodienone via an One‐Pot Bischler?Napieralski Reaction and Oxidative Coupling by a Hypervalent Iodine Reagent

Condensation of 3,4‐dimethoxybenzeneethanamine ( 3d ) and various benzeneacetic acids, i.e., 4a – e , via a practical and efficient one‐pot Bischler–Napieralski reaction, followed by NaBH₄ reduction, produced a series of 1‐benzyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinolines, i.e., 5a – e , in satisfactory yields (Scheme 3). Oxidative coupling of the N‐acyl and N‐methyl derivatives 6a – e of the latter with hypervalent iodine ([IPh(CF₃COO)₂]) yielded products with two different skeletons (Scheme 4). The major products from N‐acyl derivatives 6a – c were (±)‐N‐acylneospirodienones 2a – c , while the minor was the 3,4‐dihydroisoquinoline 7 . (±)‐Glaucine ( 1 ), however, was the major product starting from N‐methyl derivative 6e . Possible reaction mechanisms for the formation of these two types of skeleton are proposed (Scheme 5).     

Oligonucleosides with a Nucleobase‐Including Backbone,Part 2, Synthesis and Structure Determination of Adenosine‐Derived Monomers

The synthesis and structure determination of adenosine‐derived monomeric building blocks for new oligonucleosides are described. Addition of Me₃Si‐acetylide to the aldehyde derived from the known partially protected adenosine 1 led to the epimeric propargylic alcohols 2 and 3 , which were oxidised to the same ketone 4 , while silylation and deprotection led to 7 and 9 (Scheme 1). Introduction of an I substituent at C(8) of the propargylic silyl ethers 10 and 11 was not satisfactory. The protected adenosine 12 was, therefore, transformed in high yield into the 8‐chloro derivative 13 by deprotonation and treatment with PhSO₂Cl; the iodide 15 was obtained in a similar way (Scheme 2). The 8‐Cl and the 8‐I derivatives 13 and 15 were transformed into the propargylic alcohols 17 , 18 , 25 , and 26 , respectively (Scheme 3). The propargylic derivatives 2 , 10 , 17 , 19 , 23 , 25 , and 27 were correlated, and their (5′R) configuration was determined on the basis of NOEs of the anhydro nucleoside 19 ; similarly, correlation of 3 , 11 , 18 , 20 , 24 , 26 , and 28 , and NOE's of 20 evidenced their (5′S)‐configuration.     

Solid‐Phase Synthesis of Oligo(triacetylene)s and Oligo(phenylenetriacetylene)s Employing Sonogashira and Cadiot?Chodkiewicz‐Type Cross‐Coupling Reactions

We describe the first polymer‐supported synthesis of poly(triacetylene)‐derived monodisperse oligomers, utilizing Pd⁰‐catalyzed Sonogashira and Cadiot? Chodkiewicz‐type cross‐couplings as the key steps in the construction of the acetylenic scaffolds. For our investigations, Merrifield resin functionalized with a 1‐(4‐iodoaryl)triazene linker was chosen as the polymeric support ( R2 ; Figure and Scheme 3). The linker selection was made based on the results of several model studies in the liquid phase (Schemes 1 and 2). For the solid‐support synthesis of the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s 7b – 7d , a set of only three reactions was required: i) Pd⁰‐catalyzed Sonogashira cross‐coupling, ii) Me₃Si? alkyne deprotection by protodesilylation, and iii) cleavage of the linker with liberation of the generated oligomers (Scheme 5). The longest‐wavelength absorption maxima of the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s 7a – 7d shift bathochromically with increasing oligomeric length, from λ_max 337 nm (monomer 7a ) to 384 nm (tetramer 7d ; Table 2). Based on the electronic absorption data, the effective conjugation length (ECL) of the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s is estimated to involve at least four monomer units and 40 C‐atoms. π‐Electron conjugation in these oligomers is less efficient than in the known oligo(triacetylene)s 14a – 14d (Table 2) due to poor transmittance of π‐electron delocalization by the phenyl rings inserted into the oligomeric backbone. Similar conclusions were drawn from the electrochemical properties of the two oligomeric series as determined by cyclic (CV) and rotating‐disk voltammetry (RDV; Table 3). In sharp contrast to 14b – 14d , the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s 7b – 7d are strongly fluorescent, with the highest quantum yield Φ_F=0.69 measured for trimer 7c (Table 2). Whereas the Sonogashira cross‐coupling on solid support proceeded smoothly, optimal conditions for alkyne? alkyne cross‐coupling reactions employing Pd⁰‐catalyzed Cadiot? Chodkiewicz conditions still remain to be developed, despite extensive experimentation (Scheme 7 and Table 1).     

Design and Synthesis of Some Novel Oxiconazole‐Like Carboacyclic Nucleoside Analogues,as Potential Chemotherapeutic Agents

The syntheses of some novel carboacyclic nucleosides, 17a – 17o , containing oxiconazole‐like scaffolds, are described (Schemes 1–3). In this series of carboacyclic nucleosides, pyrimidine as well as purine and other imidazole derivatives were employed as an imidazole successor in oxiconazole. These compounds could be prepared in good yields by using two different strategies (Schemes 1 and 2). Due to Scheme 1, the N‐coupling of nucleobases with 2‐bromoacetophenones was attained for 18a – 18e , and their subsequent oximation affording 19a – 19e and finally O‐alkylation with diverse alkylating sources resulted in the products 17a – 17g, 17n , and 17o . In Scheme 2, use of 2‐bromoacetophenone oximes 20 , followed by N‐coupling of nucleobases, provided 19f – 19j whose final O‐alkylation produced 17h – 17m (Scheme 2). For the rational interpretation of the dominant formation of (E)‐oxime ethers rather than (Z)‐oxime isomers, PM3 semiempirical quantum‐mechanic calculations were discussed and the calculations indicated a lower heat of formation for (E)‐isomers.     

Domino‐Heck Reactions of Carba‐ and Oxabicyclic,Unsaturated Dicarboximides: Synthesis of Aryl‐Substituted,Bridged Perhydroisoindole Derivatives

The C? C coupling of the two bicyclic, unsaturated dicarboximides 5 and 6 with aryl and heteroaryl halides gave, under reductive Heck conditions, the C‐aryl‐N‐phenyl‐substituted oxabicyclic imides 7a – c and 8a – c (Scheme 3). Domino‐Heck C? C coupling reactions of 5, 6 , and 1b with aryl or heteroaryl iodides and phenyl‐ or (trimethylsilyl)acetylene also proved feasible giving 8, 9 , and 10a – c , respectively (Scheme 4). Reduction of 1b with LiAlH₄ (→ 11 ) followed by Heck arylation and reduction of 5 with NaBH₄ (→ 13 ) followed by Heck arylation open a new access to the bridged perhydroisoindole derivatives 12a , b and 14a , b with prospective pharmaceutical activity (Schemes 5 and 6).     

7‐Substituted 7‐Deaza‐2′‐deoxyadenosines and 8‐Aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyadenosines: Fluorescence of DNA‐Base Analogues Induced by the 7‐Alkynyl Side Chain

7‐Alkynylated 7‐deazaadenine (pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐4‐amine) 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides show strong fluorescence which is induced by the 7‐alkynyl side chain (Table 3). A large Stokes shift with an emission around 400 nm is observed when the compound is irradiated at 280 nm. The solvent dependence indicates the formation of a charged transition state. The fluorescence appears when the triple bond is in conjugation with the heterocyclic base. Electron‐donating substituents at the triple bond increase the fluorescence, while electron‐withdrawing residues reduce it. In comparison, the 7‐alkynylated 8‐aza‐7‐deazaadenine (pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidin‐4‐amine) 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides are rather weakly fluorescent (Table 4). Quantum yields and fluorescence decay times are measured. The synthesis of the 7‐alkynylated 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyadenosines and 8‐aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyadenosines was performed with 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxy‐7‐iodoadenosine ( 6 ) or 8‐aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxy‐7‐iodoadenosine ( 22 ) as starting materials and employing the Pd⁰‐catalyzed cross‐coupling reaction with the corresponding alkynes (Schemes 1, 4, and 5). Catalytic hydrogenation of the side chain of the unsaturated nucleosides 5 and 17 afforded the 7‐alkyl derivatives 18 and 19 , respectively, which do not show significant fluorescence (Scheme 2).     

1,3‐Diethynylallenes: Carbon‐Rich Modules for Three‐Dimensional Acetylenic Scaffolding

Regioselective Pd⁰‐catalyzed cross‐coupling of substrates, which bear bispropargylic leaving groups with silyl‐protected alkynes, has provided access to a variety of 1,3‐diethynylallenes, a new family of modules for three‐dimensional acetylenic scaffolding. In enantiomerically pure form, these C‐rich building blocks could provide access – by oxidative oligomerization – to a fascinating new class of helical oligomers and polymers with all‐carbon backbones (Fig. 2). In the first of two routes, a bispropargylic epoxide underwent ring opening during S_n 2′‐type cross‐coupling, and the resulting alkoxide was silyl‐protected, providing 1,3‐diethynylallenes (±)‐ 8 , (±)‐ 12 (Scheme 3), and (±)‐ 15 (Scheme 5). A more general approach involved bispropargylic carbonates or esters as substrates (Scheme 6–8), and this route was applied to the preparation of a series of 1,3‐diethynylallenes to investigate how their overall stability against undesirable [2+2] cycloaddition is affected by the nature of the substituents at the allene moiety. The investigation showed that the 1,3‐diethynylallene chromophore is stable against [2+2] cycloaddition only when protected by steric bulk and when additional π‐electron delocalization is avoided. The regioselectivity of the cross‐coupling to the bispropargylic substrates is entirely controlled by steric factors: attack occurs at the alkyne moiety bearing the smaller substituent (Schemes 9 and 10). Oxidative Hay coupling of the terminally mono‐deprotected 1,3‐diethynylallene (±)‐ 49 afforded the first dimer 50 , probably as a mixture of two diastereoisomers (Scheme 12). Attempts to prepare a silyl‐protected tetraethynylallene by the new methodology failed (Scheme 13). Control experiments (Schemes 14–16) showed that the Pd⁰‐catalyzed cross‐coupling to butadiyne moieties in the synthesis of this still‐elusive chromophore requires forcing conditions under which rapid [2+2] cycloaddition of the initial product cannot be avoided.     

Oligonucleosides with a Nucleobase‐Including Backbone. Part 12

In contradistinction to the corresponding Grignard reagent, bis[(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl]zinc reacted with the 5′‐oxoadenosine 3 diastereoselectively to the β‐D ‐allo‐hept‐6‐ynofuranosyladenine 5 . Lithiation/iodination of the monomeric propargyl alcohol 5 and of the dimeric propargyl alcohol 22 provided the 8‐iodoadenosines 7 and 18 , respectively, considerably shortening the synthesis of the dimeric O‐silylated 8‐iodoadenosine 25 . The mixed uridine‐ and adenosine‐derived tetramers 21 and 32 were synthesised. The tetramer 21 was prepared by a linear sequence. Sonogashira coupling of 9 and 13 yielded the trimer 16 that was C‐desilylated to 17 . A second Sonogashira coupling of 17 and 19 yielded the tetramer 21 . Tetramer 32 was prepared in higher yields by a convergent route, coupling the acetylene 29 and the iodide 30 . The uridine‐derived iodides proved more reactive than the adenosine‐derived analogues, and the N⁶‐unprotected adenosine‐derived alkynes were more reactive than their N⁶‐benzoylated analogues.     

Oligonucleosides with a Nucleobase‐Including Backbone. Part 11

A linear and a convergent synthesis of uridine‐derived backbone‐base‐dedifferentiated (backbone including) oligonucleotide analogues were compared. The Sonogashira cross‐coupling of the alkyne 1 and the iodide 2 gave the dimer 4 that was C‐desilylated and again coupled with 2 to give the trimer 6 (Scheme 1). Repeating this linear sequence led to the pentamer 10 . Coupling yields were satisfactory up to formation of the trimer 6 , but decreased for the coupling to higher oligomers. Similarly, coupling of the alkynes 5, 7 , and 9 with the iodouridine 3 gave, in decreasing yields, the trimer 12 , tetramer 13 , and pentamer 14 , respectively. The dimeric iodouracil 20 was synthesized by coupling the alkyne 17 with the iodide 16 to the dimer 18 , followed by iodination at C(6/I) to 19 and O‐silylation (Scheme 2). The iodinated dimer 23 was prepared by iodinating and O‐silylating the known dimer 21 . Coupling of 20 and 23 with the dimer 5 , trimer 7 , and tetramer 9 gave the tetramers 8 and 13 , the pentamers 10 and 14 , and the hexamer 15 , respectively (Scheme 3). The oligomers up to the pentamer 14 were deprotected to provide the trimer 24 , tetramer 25 , and pentamer 26 (Scheme 4). There was no evidence for the heteropairing of the pentamer 26 and rA₇ , nor for the pairing of rU₅ and rA₇, while a UV melting experiment showed the beginning of a sigmoid curve for the interaction of rU₇ with rA₇. Therefore, the pentamer 26 does not pair more strongly with rA₇ than rU₅.     

Photochemical Reactions of N‐(2‐Halogenoalkanoyl) Derivatives of Anilines

The photochemical reactions of 2‐substituted N‐(2‐halogenoalkanoyl) derivatives 1 of anilines and 5 of cyclic amines are described. Under irradiation, 2‐bromo‐2‐methylpropananilides 1a – e undergo exclusively dehydrobromination to give N‐aryl‐2‐methylprop‐2‐enamides (=methacrylanilides) 3a – e (Scheme 1 and Table 1). On irradiation of N‐alkyl‐ and N‐phenyl‐substituted 2‐bromo‐2‐methylpropananilides 1f – m , cyclization products, i.e. 1,3‐dihydro‐2H‐indol‐2‐ones (=oxindoles) 2f – m and 3,4‐dihydroquinolin‐2(1H)‐ones (=dihydrocarbostyrils) 4f – m , are obtained, besides 3f – m . On the other hand, irradiation of N‐methyl‐substituted 2‐chloro‐2‐phenylacetanilides 1o – q and 2‐chloroacetanilide 1r gives oxindoles 2o – r as the sole product, but in low yields (Scheme 3 and Table 2). The photocyclization of the corresponding N‐phenyl derivatives 1s – v to oxindoles 2s – v proceeds smoothly. A plausible mechanism for the formation of the photoproducts is proposed (Scheme 4). Irradiation of N‐(2‐halogenoalkanoyl) derivatives of cyclic amines 5a – c yields the cyclization products, i.e. five‐membered lactams 6a , b , and/or dehydrohalogenation products 7a , c and their cyclization products 8a , c , depending on the ring size of the amines (Scheme 5 and Table 3).     

7‐Halogenated 7‐Deazapurine 2′‐Deoxyribonucleosides Related to 2′‐Deoxyadenosine, 2′‐Deoxyxanthosine,and 2′‐Deoxyisoguanosine: Syntheses and Properties

A series of 7‐fluorinated 7‐deazapurine 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides related to 2′‐deoxyadenosine, 2′‐deoxyxanthosine, and 2′‐deoxyisoguanosine as well as intermediates 4b – 7b, 8, 9b, 10b , and 17b were synthesized. The 7‐fluoro substituent was introduced in 2,6‐dichloro‐7‐deaza‐9H‐purine ( 11a ) with Selectfluor (Scheme 1). Apart from 2,6‐dichloro‐7‐fluoro‐7‐deaza‐9H‐purine ( 11b ), the 7‐chloro compound 11c was formed as by‐product. The mixture 11b / 11c was used for the glycosylation reaction; the separation of the 7‐fluoro from the 7‐chloro compound was performed on the level of the unprotected nucleosides. Other halogen substituents were introduced with N‐halogenosuccinimides ( 11a → 11c – 11e ). Nucleobase‐anion glycosylation afforded the nucleoside intermediates 13a – 13e (Scheme 2). The 7‐fluoro‐ and the 7‐chloro‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyxanthosines, 5b and 5c , respectively, were obtained from the corresponding MeO compounds 17b and 17c , or 18 (Scheme 6). The 2′‐deoxyisoguanosine derivative 4b was prepared from 2‐chloro‐7‐fluoro‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyadenosine 6b via a photochemically induced nucleophilic displacement reaction (Scheme 5). The pK_a values of the halogenated nucleosides were determined (Table 3). ¹³C‐NMR Chemical‐shift dependencies of C(7), C(5), and C(8) were related to the electronegativity of the 7‐halogen substituents (Fig. 3). In aqueous solution, 7‐halogenated 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides show an approximately 70% S population (Fig. 2 and Table 1).     

Nucleosides and Oligonucleotides with Diynyl Side Chains: Base Pairing and Functionalization of 2′‐Deoxyuridine Derivatives by the Copper(I)‐Catalyzed Alkyne?Azide ‘Click’ Cycloaddition

Oligonucleotides containing the 5‐substituted 2′‐deoxyuridines 1b or 1d bearing side chains with terminal C?C bonds are described, and their duplex stability is compared with oligonucleotides containing the 5‐alkynyl compounds 1a or 1c with only one nonterminal C?C bond in the side chain. For this, 5‐iodo‐2′‐deoxyuridine ( 3 ) and diynes or alkynes were employed as starting materials in the Sonogashira cross‐coupling reaction (Scheme 1). Phosphoramidites 2b – d were prepared (Scheme 3) and used as building blocks in solid‐phase synthesis. T_m Measurements demonstrated that DNA duplexes containing the octa‐1,7‐diynyl side chain or a diprop‐2‐ynyl ether residue, i.e., containing 1b or 1d , are more stable than those containing only one triple bond, i.e., 1a or 1c (Table 3). The diyne‐modified nucleosides were employed in further functionalization reactions by using the protocol of the Cu^I‐catalyzed Huisgen–Meldal–Sharpless [2+3] cycloaddition (‘click chemistry’) (Scheme 2). An aliphatic azide, i. e., 3′‐azido‐3′‐deoxythymidine (AZT; 4 ), as well as the aromatic azido compound 5 were linked to the terminal alkyne group resulting in 1H‐1,2,3‐triazole‐modified derivatives 6 and 7 , respectively (Scheme 2), of which 6 forms a stable duplex DNA (Table 3). The Husigen–Meldal–Sharpless cycloaddition was also performed with oligonucleotides (Schemes 4 and 5).     

The Synthesis of Epiboxidine and Related Analogues as Potential Pharmacological Agents

Methyl epiboxidine‐N‐carboxylate ( 8 ) was synthesized from 7 under reductive Heck conditions (Scheme 2). The C? C coupling of the new epiboxidine analog 9 with aryl and heteroaryl halides gave by hydroarylation C‐aryl, N‐(3‐methylisoxazol‐5‐yl)‐substituted tricyclic imides 10a – 10f (Table). The [3+2] cycloaddition of 9 with nitrile oxides yielded the bridged dihydroisoxazole derivatives 11a – 11d with potential biological activity (Scheme 4).     

Concise Synthesis of [1,1′‐Biisoquinoline]‐4,4′‐diol via a Protecting Group Strategy and Its Application for Potential Liquid‐Crystalline Compounds

The [1,1′‐biisoquinoline]‐4,4′‐diol ( 4a ), which was obtained as hydrochloride 4a ?2 HCl in two steps starting from the methoxymethyl (MOM)‐protected 1‐chloroisoquinoline 8 (Scheme 3), opens access to further O‐functionalized biisoquinoline derivatives. Compound 4a ?2 HCl was esterified with 4‐(hexadecyloxy)benzoyl chloride ( 5b ) to give the corresponding diester 3b (Scheme 4), which could not be obtained by Ni‐mediated homocoupling of 6b (Scheme 2). The ether derivative 2b was accessible in good yield by reaction of 4a ?2 HCl with the respective alkyl bromide 9 under the conditions of Williamson etherification (Scheme 4). Slightly modified conditions were applied to the esterification of 4a ?2 HCl with galloyl chlorides 10a – h as well as etherification of 4a ?2 HCl with 6‐bromohexyl tris(alkyloxy)benzoates 11b , d – h and [(6‐bromohexyl)oxy]‐substituted pentakis(alkyloxy)triphenylenes 14a – c (Scheme 5). Despite the bulky substituents, the respective target 1,1′‐biisoquinolines 12, 13 , and 15 were isolated in 14–86% yield (Table).     

Synthesis and Irradiation of Vitamin‐B12‐Derived Complexes Incorporating Peripheral G⋅C Base Pairs

The vitamin‐B₁₂ derivative 11 , incorporating a peripheral N⁴‐acetylcytosine moiety, was alkylated under reductive conditions with 2‐(iodomethyl)‐2‐methylmonothiomalonate 8 bearing the complementary guanine moiety. The reaction yielded a mixture of vitamin‐B₁₂‐derived complexes with variations in the cytosine moiety: products 16 – 18 with a cytosine, a N⁴‐acetylated cytosine, and a N⁴‐acetylated reduced cytosine moiety were formed (see Scheme 5). The complexes were photolyzed in CHCl₃/MeCN to yield the dimethylmalonate derivative 22 (Scheme 6) but not the rearranged succinate, in contrast to the results obtained earlier with complexes incorporating the A⋅T base pair (see Scheme 1).     

Synthesis of Monosaccharide‐Derived Spirocyclic Cyclopropylamines and Their Evaluation as Glycosidase Inhibitors

The glucose‐, mannose‐, and galactose‐derived spirocyclic cyclopropylammonium chlorides 1a – 1d, 2a – 2d and 3a – 3d were prepared as potential glycosidase inhibitors. Cyclopropanation of the diazirine 5 with ethyl acrylate led in 71% yield to a 4 : 5 : 1 : 20 mixture of the ethyl cyclopropanecarboxylates 7a – 7d , while the Cu‐catalysed cycloaddition of ethyl diazoacetate to the exo‐glycal 6 afforded 7a – 7d (6 : 2 : 5 : 3) in 93–98% yield (Scheme 1). Saponification, Curtius degradation, and subsequent addition of BnOH or t‐BuOH led in 60–80% overall yield to the Z‐ or Boc‐carbamates 11a – 11d and 12a – 12d , respectively. Hydrogenolysis of 11a – 11d afforded 1a – 1d , while 12a – 12d was debenzylated to 13a – 13d prior to acidic cleavage of the N‐Boc group. The manno‐ and galacto‐isomers 2a – 2d and 3a – 3d , respectively, were similarly obtained in comparable yields (Schemes 2 and 4). Also prepared were the differentially protected manno‐configured esters 24a – 24d ; they are intermediates for the synthesis of analogous N‐acetylglucosamine‐derived cyclopropanes (Scheme 3). The cyclopropylammonium chlorides 1a – 1d, 2a – 2d and 3a – 3d are very weak inhibitors of several glycosidases (Tables 1 and 2). Traces of Pd compounds, however, generated upon catalytic debenzylation, proved to be strong inhibitors. PdCl is, indeed, a reversible, micromolar inhibitor for the β‐glucosidases from C. saccharolyticum and sweet almonds (non‐competitive), the β‐galactosidases from bovine liver and from E. coli (both non‐competitive), the α‐galactosidase from Aspergillus niger (competitive), and an irreversible inhibitor of the α‐glucosidase from yeast and the α‐galactosidase from coffee beans. The cyclopropylamines derived from 1a – 1d or 3a – 3d significantly enhance the inhibition of the β‐glucosidase from C. saccharolyticum by PdCl , lowering the K_i value from 40 μM (PdCl ) to 0.5 μM for a 1 : 1 mixture of PdCl and 1d . A similar effect is shown by cyclopropylamine, but not by several other amines.     

Transformation of Amino Acids into Nonracemic 1‐(Heteroaryl)ethanamines by the Enamino Ketone Methodology

N‐Protected L ‐phenylalanines 1a,b were transformed, via the corresponding Weinreb amides 2 and ethynyl ketones 3 , into chiral enamino ketones 4 (Scheme 1). Similarly, L ‐threonine 6 was transformed in four steps into the enamino ketone 10 . Cyclocondensations of 4 and 10 with pyrazolamines 11 , benzenecarboximidamide ( 12 ), and hydrazine derivatives 18 afforded N‐protected 1‐heteroaryl‐2‐phenylethanamines 15a – e, 16, 17 , and 21a – k and 1‐heteroaryl‐1‐aminopropan‐2‐ols 23a,b in good yields (Schemes 2 and 3). Finally, deprotection by catalytic hydrogenation furnished free amines 22a – g and 24a,b (Scheme 3).