Synthesis of mer-[RuCl3(DMSO)(bpy)], reactivity and electrochemistry of mer-[RuCl3(DMSO)(bpy)] and mer-[RuCl3(TMSO)(bpy)] complexes

[H(DMSO)₂][trans-RuCl₄(DMSO)₂] (1) reacts with 2,2′-bipyridine in ethanol at room temperature resulting in the formation of a major compound, mer-[RuCl₃(DMSO)(bpy)] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) 3 and a known minor compound, cis-[RuCl₂(DMSO)₄] (4). The compounds 3 and 4 are formed via an anticipated intermediate mer-[RuCl₃(DMSO)₃] (2). The reaction of 3 and mer-[RuCl₃(TMSO)(bpy)] (5) with small molecules like imidazole, carbon monoxide and KSCN yield, mer-[RuCl₃(bpy)(im)] · 2DMSO (im = imidazole) (6) and cis-[RuCl₂(TMSO)(CO)(bpy)] (7), cis-[RuCl₂(DMSO)(CO)(bpy)] (8) and K[RuCl₃(bpy)(SCN)] (9), respectively. The formations of 3, 6 and 7 have been authenticated by single crystal structure determinations. Compound 6 is formed by the substitution of DMSO or TMSO from 3 and 5, respectively, whereas 7 and 8 are formed by unprecedented one-electron reductions of 5 and 3. The reactions of 3 and 5 with KSCN resulted in the same compound, K[RuCl₃(NCS)(bpy)] (9). DFT calculations were performed to distinguish whether the thiocyanate ligand is bound to ruthenium through S or N. In the ruthenium bipyridine systems, the HOMO contains ruthenium d-orbitals and the LUMO is typically π^*-orbitals of the bipyridine ring. Complexes 3, 6 and 7 are redox active in acetone and DMSO solvent showing prominent a reduction peak and corresponding oxidation peak.     

Synthesis and Fluorescence of a New Active Material for Electrochemiluminescent Sensor:Ru(phen)2[phen-NHCO(CH2)4Br](PF6)2

Recently, much attention has been paid to Ru(II) complexes because of their excellent properties of photochemistry, phtophysis. Bis(2,2'-bipyridine)[4-methyl-4'-(6-bromohexyl)-2,2'-bipyridine] ruthenium(II) perchlorate has been used as an active material for electrochemiluminescent (ECL) sensor for selective detection of oxalic acid.It is known that ECL efficiency of Ru(phen)₃²⁺ is much higher than that of Ru(bpy)₃²⁺. In order to make out more efficient ECL sensor, we have designed and synthesized a new Ru(II) complex, Ru(phen)₂[phen-NHCO(CH₂)₄Br](PF₆)₂.     

Metallorganische lewissäuren : XX. Reaktionen von (π-C5H5)(CO)2LM-X (L = CO, PR3; M = Mo, W; X = BF4, PF6, AsF6, SbF6) mit Schwefel-haltigen liganden

The compounds (π-C₅H₅)(CO)₂LM-X (L = CO, PR₃; M = Mo, W; X = BF₄, PF₆, AsF₆, SbF₆) react with H₂S, p-MeC₆H₄SH, Ph₂S and Ph₂SO(L′) to give ionic complexes [(π-C₅H₅)(CO)₂LML′]⁺ X⁻. Also sulfur-bridged complexes, [(π-C₅H₅)(CO)₃W---SH---W(CO)₃(π-C₅H₅)]⁺ AsF₆⁻ and [(π-C₅H₅)(CO)₃M-μ-S₂C=NCH₂Ph-M(CO)₃(π-C₅H₅)], have been obtained. Reactions with SO₂ and CS₂ have been examined.     

Übergangsmetall-Carben-Komplexe : CXXXXI. Untersuchungen zum Reaktionsverhalten der Carben-Komplexe cis-(CO)4(SnPh3)Re[C(OEt)NR2] (R = pr, hex) gegenüber Lewis-Säuren

In the reaction of cis-(CO)₄(SnPh₃)Re[C(OEt)NR₂] (R = ⁱpr (isopropyl), ^chex (cyclohexyl)) with BI₃ the Lewis acid attacks the triphenylstannyl ligand. Substitution of a phenyl for a iodine group leads to equilibrium mixtures of rhenium carbene complexes of general formula cis-(CO)₄(SnPh_3−χI_χ)Re[C(OEt)NR₂] (χ = 1−3; R = ⁱpr, ^chex). By changing the solvent and ratio of can be shifted such that only one major product is formed. Thus this reaction pathway can be used for the preparation of cis-(CO)₄(SnPhI₂)Re[C(OEt)NR₂] (R = ⁱpr, ^chex). Even when a large excess of BI₃ is present electrophilic attack by the Lewis acid on the carbene ligand is not observed.

Synthesis of cis-(CO)₄(SnPh_3−χI_χ)Re[C(OEt)NR₂] (χ = 1−3; R --- ⁱpr, ^chex) can be achieved in high yield by reaction of cis-(CO)₄(SnPh₃)Re[C(OEt)NR₂] (R = ⁱpr, ^chex) with one, two or three equivalents of HI. This reaction, with successive rupture of the tin-carbon bonds in the triphenylstannyl ligand and the simultaneous formation of benzene, affords the desired substitution product irreversibly. Reaction of cis-(CO)₄(SnPh₃)Re[C(OEt)NR₂] (R = ⁱpr, ^chex) with I₂ gives the compounds, cis-(CO)₄(SnI₃)Re[C(OEt)NR₂] (R = ⁱpr, ^chex), in relatively low yields.     

Imido complexes of molybdenum and tungsten(VI); X-ray crystal structure of cis-(η-CF3SO3)2 W(NBu)2(NH2Bu)2

The synthesis of the homoleptic molybdenum imido compound Li₂Mo(NBu^t)₄ is reported. The complexes M (NBu^t)₂(NHBu^t)₂ (M = Mo, W) can be protonated with various strong acids giving neutral species. The X-ray crystal structure of the tungsten complex W (NBu^t)₂(NH₂Bu^t)₂ (SO₃CF₃)₂ confirms the presence of O-coordinated cis- CF₃SO₃ groups.     

Synthesis, characterisation and reactivity of trans-[Ru(L)(PPh3)Br2]; L=2-pyridyl-N-(2′-methylthiophenyl)methyleneimine: Crystal structure of trans-[Ru(L)(PPh3)Br2]

Reaction of Ru(PPh₃)₂Br₂ with the NNS chelating tridentate ligand 2-pyridyl-N-(2′-methylthiophenyl)methyleneimine (L) led to the isolation of the ruthenium(II) complex [Ru(L)(PPh₃)Br₂]. Reactivity of this complex with different bidentate chelating ligands revealed that the products are quite different from those obtained by reacting Ru(L)(PPh₃)Cl₂ (the corresponding cis dichloro complex) with the same ligands under comparable conditions. The mixed chelates were isolated and characterised by elemental analysis, magnetic moment measurement and by different spectroscopic methods along with their precursor. Electrochemistry of the complexes was examined by cyclic voltammetry using a platinum working electrode and a Ag/AgCl electrode as reference. The crystal structure of [Ru(L)(PPh₃)Br₂] disclosed that, unlike Ru(L)(PPh₃)Cl₂, the two bromo ligands are in trans position and this explained the difference in its reactivity pattern from the corresponding chloro complex.     

Reactivity of ruthenium complexes with uninegative (X,S)-donor ligands (X = S,P)—II. Phosphine substitution in [Ru(S,S)2(PR3)2] derivatives. Crystal structure of trans-bis(O-ethyldithiocarbonate)bis(dimethylphenylphosphine)-ruthenium(II)

The complexes [Ru(S,S)₂(PPh₃)₂] [S,S = EtCOCS₂⁻, (CH₂)₄NCS₂⁻] react with a variety of tertiary phosphines with the substitution of triphenylphosphine and the formation of [Ru(S,S)₂(PR₃)₂]. The reaction occurs with the formation ofthe cis isomer, except for the complex with PMe₂Ph that gives rise to the trans isomer as the crystal structure shows. The effect of the different phosphines on the ruthenium complex is analysed in terms of the spectroscopic and electrochemical properties of the isolated compounds. The cyclic voltammetric studies of the cis complexes show that isomerization to the trans isomer occurs on oxidation. This isomerization is not observed in the trans-[Ru(S,S)₂(PMe₂Ph)₂] complexes that give rise to stable trans-ruthenium(II)/ruthenium(III) couples. In a similar way the diphosphine complexes afford a quasi-reversible cis-ruthenium(II)/ruthenium(III) process.     

Low-temperature heat capacity and thermodynamic properties of crystalline [Re2(Ala)4(H2O)8](ClO4)6 (Re = Eu, Er; Ala = alanine)

[Re₂(Ala)₄(H₂O)₈](ClO₄)₆ (Re=Eu, Er; Ala=alanine) were synthesized, and the low-temperature heat capacities of the two complexes were measured with a high-precision adiabatic calorimeter over the temperature range from 80 to 370 K. For [Eu₂(Ala)₄(H₂O)₈](ClO₄)₆, two solid–solid phase transitions were found, one in the temperature range from 234.403 to 249.960 K, with peak temperature 243.050 K, the other in the range from 249.960 to 278.881 K, with peak temperature 270.155 K. For [Er₂(Ala)₄(H₂O)₈](ClO₄)₆, one solid–solid phase transition was observed in the range from 270.696 to 282.156 K, with peak temperature 278.970 K. The molar enthalpy increments, ΔH_m, and entropy increments,ΔS_m, of these phase transitions, were determined to be 455.6 J mol⁻¹, 1.87 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ at 243.050 K; 2277 J mol⁻¹, 8.43 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ at 270.155 K for [Eu₂(Ala)₄(H₂O)₈](ClO₄)₆; and 4442 J mol⁻¹, 15.92 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ at 278.970 K for [Er₂(Ala)₄(H₂O)₈](ClO₄)₆. Thermal decompositions of the two complexes were investigated by use of the thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. A possible mechanism for the thermal decomposition is suggested.     

Multiple ligand transfer reaction between [CpRu(L)(AN)2][PF6] (L=AN, CO, P(OMe)3; AN=acetonitrile) and CpFe(CO)L′X (L′=CO, PMe3, PMe2Ph, PMePh2, PPh3, P(OPh)3; X=Cl, Br, I)

Treatment of ruthenium complexes [CpRu(AN)₃][PF₆] (1a) (AN=acetonitrile) with iron complexes CpFe(CO)₂X (2a–2c) (X=Cl, Br, I) and CpFe(CO)L′X (6a–6g) (L′=PMe₃, PMe₂Ph, PMePh₂, PPh₃, P(OPh)₃; X=Cl, Br, I) in refluxing CH₂Cl₂ for 3 h results in a triple ligand transfer reaction from iron to ruthenium to give stable ruthenium complexes CpRu(CO)₂X (3a–3c) (X=Cl, Br, I) and CpRu(CO)L′X (7a–7g) (L′=PMe₃, PMe₂Ph, PMePh₂, PPh₃, P(OPh)₃; X=Br, I), respectively. Similar reaction of [CpRu(L)(AN)₂][PF₆] (1b: L=CO, 1c: P(OMe)₃) causes double ligand transfer to yield complexes 3a–3c and 7a–7h. Halide on iron, CO on iron or ruthenium, and two acetonitrile ligands on ruthenium are essential for the present ligand transfer reaction. The dinuclear ruthenium complex 11a [CpRu(CO)(μ-I)]₂ was isolated from the reaction of 1a with 6a at 0°C. Complex 11a slowly decomposes in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature to give 3a, and transforms into 7a by the reaction with PMe₃.     

Zur Komplexierung von enantiomerenreinen cis- und trans-3-Diphenylphosphino-4-hydroxy-tetrahydrofuranen mit [Rh(COD)2]BF4

The complexation behaviour of cis- und trans-3-diphenylphosphino-4-hydroxyl-tetrahydrofurans with [Rh(COD)₂]BF₄ is studied with the help of NMR and IR spectroscopy. In dependence of the spatial arrangement of hydroxyl and phosphino group the formation of different intra- and intermolecular bridged O-P complexes has been observed.

Zusammenfassung

Das Komplexierungsverhalten von cis- und trans-3-Diphenylphosphino-4-hydroxy-tetrahydrofuranen mit [Rh(COD)₂]BF₄ wird mit Hilfe von NMR- und IR-Spektroskopie studiert. In Abhängigkeit von der räumlichen Anordnung von Hydroxy- und Phosphinogruppe zueinander wird die Bildung von intra- bzw. intermolekular verbrückten O-P-Komplexen beobachtet.     

Mercury(II) halide adducts of an olefinic double betaine: [{Hg2L2X4·6HgX2}n] [X = Cl, Br; L = cis-(p-Me2NC5H4N)2C2(COO)2]

Two polymeric mercury(II) halide adducts of an olefinic double betaine, cis-(p-Me₂NC₅H₄N⁺)₂C₂(COO⁻)₂ (L), have been prepared and characterized by X-ray crystallography. [{Hg₂L₂Cl₄·6HgCl₂}_n] (1) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with Z = 4, and [{Hg₂L₂Br₄·HgBr₂}_n] (2) in the triclinic space group P with Z = 1. Complexes 1 and 2 are structurally similar, being composed of centrosymmetric fourteen-membered rings and nearly linear HgX₂ (X = Cl, Br) moieties that are further inter-linked by weak HgX [HgCl = 2.930–3.136(9) Å, HgBr = 3.057–3.310(6) Å] and HgO [2.64, 2.75(3) Å] bonds to generate a two-dimensional polymeric network.     

Reactions of the cationic diruthenium carbonyl complex [Ru2(μ-dppm)2(CO)4(μ,η-O2CMe)] with bidentate ligands; intramolecularly assisted stereospecific synthesis via the second-sphere face-to-face π–π stacking interactions

The reactions of the diruthenium carbonyl complexes [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(CO)₄(μ,η²-O₂CMe)]X (X=BF₄⁻ (1a) or PF₆⁻ (1b)) with neutral or anionic bidentate ligands (L,L) afford a series of the diruthenium bridging carbonyl complexes [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-CO)₂(η²-(L,L))₂]X_n ((L,L)=acetate (O₂CMe), 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), acetylacetonate (acac), 8-quinolinolate (quin); n=0, 1, 2). Apparently with coordination of the bidentate ligands, the bound acetate ligand of [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(CO)₄(μ,η²-O₂CMe)]⁺ either migrates within the same complex or into a different one, or is simply replaced. The reaction of [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(CO)₄(μ,η²-O₂CMe)]⁺ (1) with 2,2′-bipyridine produces [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-CO)₂(η²-O₂CMe)₂] (2), [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-CO)₂(η²-O₂CMe)(η²-bpy)]⁺ (3), and [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-CO)₂(η²-bpy)₂]²⁺ (4). Alternatively compound 2 can be prepared from the reaction of 1a with MeCO₂H–Et₃N, while compound 4 can be obtained from the reaction of 3 with bpy. The reaction of 1b with acetylacetone–Et₃N produces [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-CO)₂(η²-O₂CMe)(η²-acac)] (5) and [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-CO)₂(η²-acac)₂] (6). Compound 2 can also react with acetylacetone–Et₃N to produce 6. Surprisingly [Ru₂(μ-dppm)₂(μ-CO)₂(η²-quin)₂] (7) was obtained stereospecifically as the only one product from the reaction of 1b with 8-quinolinol–Et₃N. The structure of 7 has been established by X-ray crystallography and found to adopt a cis geometry. Further, the stereospecific reaction is probably caused by the second-sphere π–π face-to-face stacking interactions between the phenyl rings of dppm and the electron-deficient six-membered ring moiety of the bound quinolinate (i.e. the N-included six-membered ring) in 7. The presence of such interactions is indeed supported by an observed charge-transfer band in a UV–vis spectrum.     

Intervalence electron transfer through a thiolate bridge ligand: a Fe–S–R–Fe mixed valence complex

The reaction of Cp(dppe)FeI with the ligands 2,2′- and 4,4′-dithiobispyridine (S₂(Py)₂) give the mononuclear or binuclear complexes of the type [Cp(dppe)Fe-S₂(Py)₂]PF₆, [Cp(dppe)Fe---SPy]PF₆ or [{Cp(dppe)Fe}₂-μ-SPy](PF₆)₂ depending on the reaction condition. Reaction of Cp(dppe)FeI with dithiobispyridines in presence of TlPF₆ as halide abstractor and using CH₂Cl₂ as a solvent gives the complexes [Cp(dppe)Fe-4,4′-S₂(Py)₂)₂]PF₆ (1) and [CpFe(dppe)-2,2′-S₂(Py)₂]PF₆ (2) whereas the same reaction using CH₃OH as a solvent and NH₄PF₆ as the halide abstractor leads to the formation of the Fe^III–thiolate complex [Cp(dppe)Fe-2,2′-SPy]PF₆ (3) and the mixed-valence complex [Cp(dppe)Fe^III-μSPy-Fe^II(dppe)Cp](PF₆)₂ (4). Magnetic and ESR measurements are in agreement with one unpaired electron delocalized between them. Mössbauer data indicate clearly the presence of two different iron sites, each one of the N-bonded and S-bonded iron atoms, with intermediate oxidation state Fe^II---Fe^III. An electron transfer intervalence absorption was observed for this complex at 780 nm (in CH₂Cl₂). By applying the Hush theory the intervalence parameters were obtained; =0.028, H_ab=361 cm⁻¹ which indicate Class II Robin–Day. Estimation of the rate electron transfer affords a value k_th=6.5×10⁶ s⁻¹. Solvent effect on the intervalence transition follow the Hush prediction for high dielectric constants solvents which permit the evaluation of the outer and inner-sphere reorganizational parameters, which were analyzed and discussed. The electronic interaction parameters compare well with those found for electron transfer in metalloproteins.     

Rhenium(I) methoxo carbonyl complexes containing tetraphosphine or triphosphine ligands; facile separation and X-ray crystallographic studies of d/l- and meso-[{Re2(μ-OMe)2(CO)6}2(μ,μ′-1,1,4,7,10,10-hexaphenyl-1,4,7,10-tetra-phosphadecane)]

Reaction of the activated mixture of Re₂(CO)_10, Me₃NO and MeOH with a 1:1 mixture of rac (d/l)- and meso-1,1,4,7,10,10-hexaphenyl-1,4,7,10-tetraphosphadecane (hptpd) yields a mixture of (d/l)- and meso-[{Re₂(μ-OMe)₂(CO)₆}₂(μ,μ′-hptpd)] 1. The diastereomers can be easily separated by selective dissolution of d/l-1 in benzene, and give clearly distinguishable ¹H- and ³¹P-NMR spectra. The fluxional behavior of d/l-1 in solution has been studied by variable-temperature ¹H- and ³¹P-{¹H}-NMR spectroscopy. The crystal structures of both d/l- and meso-1 have been determined. Both molecules consist of two {Re₂(μ-OMe)₂(CO)₆} moieties which are bridged by the two P---CH₂---CH₂---P moieties of the hptpd ligand. Whilst the molecules of meso-1 possess crystallographic i-symmetry, those of d/l-1 do not have any crystallographic symmetry. These diastereomers therefore give clearly distinguishable Raman spectra in the solid state. Reaction of tris[2-(diphenylphosphino)ethyl]phosphine (tdppep) with the activated mixture affords the complex [{Re₂(μ-OMe)₂(CO)₆}(μ,η²-tdppep)] 2, and the analogous reaction involving bis[2-diphenylphospinoethyl)phenylphosphine (triphos) gives [{Re₂(μ-OMe)₂(CO)₆}(μ,μ′,η³-triphos){Re₂(CO)₉}] 3 and [{Re₂(μ-OMe)₂(CO)₆}(μ,η²-triphos)] 4.     

Synthesis and derivative chemistry of [Ru2(μ-PPh2) (μ-OH) 2(μ-p-cymene) 2]

The cationic diphenylphosphido-bridged compound [Ru₂(μ-PPh₂)(μ-OH)₂(η⁶-p-cymene)₂][PF₆) (2) has been prepared by reaction of the tri-μ-hydroxo complex [Ru₂(μ-OH)₃(η-p-cymene)₂][PF₆] (1) with diphenylphosphine. Complex 2 eliminates water on reaction with protic acids, incorporating the conjugate base of the added acid as a bridging ligand. Formic acid, acetic acid, phenol, and aniline react with 2 to give the monosubstituted compounds [Ru₂(μ-PPh₂)(μ-OH)(μ-L)(η⁶-p-cymene)₂]PF₆] (L = HCO₂, MeCO₂, OPh, or NHPH), whereas methanol, thiophenol, 1,2-benzenedithiol, hydrochloric acid and isopropanol afford the disubstituted derivatives [Ru₂(μ-PPh₂)(μ-L)₂(η⁶-p-cymene)₂]PF₆] (L = OMe, SPh, S₂C₆H₄, Cl, or H).     

Diastereoselective synthesis of a resolved secondary arsine complex: asymmetric synthesis of (R-(−)589-ethylmethylphenylarsine

The reaction of [R-(R,R)]-(+)₅₈₉-[(η⁵-C₅H₅){1,2-C₆H₄(PMePh)₂}Fe(NCMe)]PF₆ with (±)-AsHMePh in boiling methanol yields crystalline [R-[(R)-(R,R)]-(+)_{589)-[(η⁵-C5H5){1,2-C6H4(PMePh)2}Fe(AsHMePH)}PF₆, optically pure, in ca. 90% yield, in a typical second-order asymmetric transformation. This complex contains the first resolved secondary arsine. Deprotonation of the secondary arsine complex with KOBu^t at −65°C gives the diastereomerically pure tertiary arsenido-iron complex [R-[(R),(R,R)]]-[((η⁵-C₅H₅){1,2-C₆H₄(PMePh)₂}FeAsMePh] · thf, from which optically pure [R-[(S),(R,R)]]-(+)₅₈₉-[(η⁵-C₅H₅){1,2-C₆H₄(PMePh)₂}Fe(AsEtMePh)PF₆ is obtained by reaction with iodoethane. Cyanide displaces (R)-(−)₅₈₉-ethylmethylphenylarsine from the iron complex, thereby effecting the asymmetric synthesis of a tertiary arsine, chiral at arsenic, from (±)-methylphenylarsine and an optically active transition metal auxiliary.     

Preparation and characterization of M2(SeAr′)6 and mixed ligand M2(OR)2(SeAr′)4 species (M = Mo, W)

Toluene solutions of M₂(NMe₂)₆ (M = Mo, W) react with mesitylene selenol (Ar′SeH) to give M₂(SeAr′) ₆ complexes. MO₂(OR)₆ (R = ^tBu, CH₂^tBu) react with excess> 6 fold) Ar′SeH to give Mo₂ (SeAr′)₆, whilst W₂(OR)₆(py)₂ (R = ⁱPr, CH₂^tBu) react with excess (> 6 fold) Ar′SeH to give W₂(OR)₂(SeAr′)₄. Reaction of MO₂(OPrⁱ)₆ with Ar′SeH produces Mo₂(OPrⁱ)₂ (SeAr′)₄ which crystallizes in two different space groups. These areneselenato complexes are air-stable and insoluble in common organic solvents. X-ray crystallographic studies revealed that the Mo₂(SeAr′)₆ and W₂(SeAr′)₆ compounds are isostructural in the solid state and adopt ethane-like staggered configurations with the following important structural parameters, M---M (W---W/Mo---Mo) 2.3000(11)/2.2175(13) Å, M---Se 2.430 (av.)/2.440 (av.) Å, M---M---SE 97.0° (av.)°. In the solid state W₂(OⁱPr)₂(SeAr′)₄ adopts the anti-configuration with crystallographically imposed C_i symmetry and W---W 2.3077(7) Å, W---Se 2.435 (av.) Å, W---O 1.858(6) Å; W---W---SE 100.27(3)°, 93.8(3)° and W---W---O 108.41(17)°. Mo₂(OPrⁱ)₂(SeAr′) ₄ crystallizes in both P and A2/a space groups in which the molecules are isostructural with each other and the tungsten analogue. Important bond lengths and angles are Mo---Mo 2.180(24) Å, Mo---Se 2.432(av.) Å, Mo---O 1.872(9) Å, Mo---Mo---Se 99.39(9)°, 94.71(8)°, Mo---Mo---O 107.55(28)°.     

Copper thioether chemistry: The synthesis and single crystal X-ray structures of [Cu2([18]aneS6)(NCMe)2](ClO4)2 and [Cu([9]aneS3)(AsPPh3)](ClO4)

Reaction of [18]aneS₆ with two molar equivalents of [Cu(NCMe)₄](ClO₄) in CH₂Cl₂-MeCN affords the binuclear copper(I) complex [Cu₂([18]aneS₆)(NCMe)₂](ClO₄)₂. The single crystal X-ray structure of the complex shows a centrosymmetric cation with two tetrahedral copper(I) centres each coordinated to three thioether S-donors of [18]aneS₆,Cu---S(1) = 2.3200(15), Cu---S(4) = 2.3415(16), Cu---S(7) = 2.3250(15) Å, and to one MeCN molecule, Cu---N(1) = 1.939(5) Å, to give an overall NS₃-donation at the metal centres. Additionally, S(7′) shows a long-range interaction, Cu …S(7′) = 3.318(2) Å thus distorting the coordination geometry of the metal ion towards trigonal bipyramidal. The metal-metal separation of 4.428(2) Å suggests that there is no significant interaction between the copper centres of the dimer. Reaction of [9]aneS₃ with one molar equivalent of [Cu(NCMe)₄](ClO₄) in refluxing MeCN in the presence of ligands, L, affords the adducts [Cu([9]aneS₃)L]⁺ (L = PPh₃, AsPh₃). The single crystal X-ray structure of the complex [Cu([9]aneS₃)(AsPh₃)](ClO₄) shows tetrahedral AsS₃ coordination at copper(I) with [9]aneS₃ bound facially to the metal centre, Cu---S = 2.303(6), Cu---As = 2.322(4) Å.     

Synthesis and characterization of planarly chiral nonbridged bis(1-R-indenyl) zirconium dichloride complexes and X-ray structure of rac-[(η-C9H6-1-C(CH3)2---o-C6H4---OCH3)2ZrCl2]·THF

Reactions of the lithium salts of 3-substituted indenes 1, 2 with ZrCl₄(THF)₂ gave two series of nonbridged bis(1-substituted)indenyl zirconocene dichloride complexes. Fractional recrystallization from THF–petroleum ether furnished the pure racemic and mesomeric isomers of [(η⁵-C₉H₆-1-C(R¹)(R²)---o-C₆H₄---OCH₃)₂ZrCl₂]·nTHF (R¹=R²=CH₃, n=1, rac-1a and meso-1b; R¹=CH₃, R²=C₂H₅; n=0.5 or 0, rac-2a and meso-2b), respectively. Complex 1a was further characterized by X-ray diffraction to have a C₂ symmetrically racemic structure, where the six-member rings of the indenyl parts are oriented laterally and two o-CH₃O---C₆H₄---C(CH₃)₂--- substituents are oriented to the open side of the metallocene (Ind: bis-lateral, anti; Substituent: bis-central, syn). The four zirconocene complexes are highly symmetrical in solution as characterized by room temperature ¹H-NMR, however ¹H–¹H NOESY of meso-1b shows that some of the NOE interactions arise from the two separated indenyl parts of the same molecule, which can only be well explained by taking into account the torsion isomers in solution.     

Absence of phosphate hydrolysis in the nucleotide substitution reaction on cis-[Co(H2O)2(cyclen)] at physiological pH: Importance of hydrogen-bonding and conjugate base-catalysis

The use of classical Werner-type cis-[Co(Cl)₂(tetraamine)]⁺ (tetraamine = cyclen or tren) complexes for their complexation study of biologically relevant ligands has been pursued. These chlorocomplexes are found to be in the chloroaqua/chlorohydroxo forms under the physiological conditions used, their chloride substitution reactivity being dominated by conjugate base pathways, specially when tetraamine = cyclen. Further studies with nucleotides indicate that the substitution processes on cis-[Co(H₂O)₂(tetraamine)]³⁺, up to neutral pH, correspond to a simple reaction producing final stable phosphato bound mononucleotide complexes. These complexes are found to be an equilibrium mixture between monodentate O-phosphato and chelate O-phosphato-N-nucleotide forms. No evidence has been found for hydrolytic cleavage of the phosphato-nucleoside bond, as found in other systems with activated phosphates or higher pH values. A full kinetic profile of the process is proposed for the systems in the 2–7 pH range which is the same for chloride, nucleoside and nucleotide substitutions. The results are indicative of an important degree of outer-sphere hydrogen bonding between the cobaltocomplex and the entering biologically relevant ligands, as expected for these processes.