Modeling lanthanide complexes: sparkle/AM1 parameters for ytterbium (III)

The Sparkle/AM1 model is extended to ytterbium (III) complexes. Thus, a set of 15 complexes, with various representative ligands, chosen to be representative of all complexes of high crystallographic quality (R-factor <0.05 A) in the Cambridge Crystallographic Database, and which possess oxygen and/or nitrogen as coordinating atoms, was used as the training set. In the validation procedure we added 32 more high quality crystallographic structures. For the 47 complexes, the Sparkle/AM1 unsigned mean error for all interatomic distances between the Yb(III) ion and the ligand atoms of the first sphere of coordination is 0.07 A, similar to present-day ab initio/ECP geometry prediction accuracies, and potentially useful for luminescent complex design while being hundreds of times faster.     

Modeling lanthanide coordination compounds: Sparkle/AM1 parameters for praseodymium (III)

The Sparkle/AM1 model, recently defined for Eu(III), Gd(III) and Tb(III) [R.O. Freire, G.B. Rocha, A.M., Simas, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005) 3299] is now extended to Pr(III), using the same parameterization scheme. Thus, a set of 15 complexes, with various representative ligands of high crystallographic quality (R-factor < 0.05 Å) and which possess oxygen and/or nitrogen as coordinating atoms, was used as the training set. In the validation procedure we used a set of 33 more structures, also of high crystallographic quality. For the 48 complexes, the Sparkle/AM1 unsigned mean error, for all interatomic distances between the Pr(III) ion and the ligand atoms of the first sphere of coordination, is 0.08 Å, again comparable to present day ab initio/ECP calculations, while being hundreds of times faster.     

AM1 Sparkle modeling of Er(III) and Ce(III) coordination compounds

The recently defined Sparkle/AM1 model is now extended to Er(III) and Ce(III), using the same parameterization scheme. Thus, a set of fifteen complexes for each lanthanide ion, with various representative ligands of high crystallographic quality (R factor < 0.05 Å), and which possess oxygen and/or nitrogen as coordinating atoms, was used as the training set. In the validation procedure we used a set of twenty-two more complex structures for the Ce(III) ion and twenty-four more for the Er(III) ion, all of high crystallographic quality. For the thirty-seven cerium(III) complexes and thirty-nine erbium(III) complexes considered, the Sparkle/AM1 unsigned mean error, for all interatomic distances between the Ln(III) ion and the ligand atoms of the first sphere of coordination, is 0.08 and 0.06 Å, a level of accuracy comparable to present day ab initio/ECP geometries, while being hundreds of times faster. The Sparkle/AM1 model may thus prove useful for luminescent complex design.     

Sparkle model for AM1 calculation of neodymium(III) coordination compounds

The Sparkle/AM1 model, the only available semiempirical quantum chemical model for the calculation of complexes of lanthanide ions, recently defined for Eu(III), Gd(III) and Tb(III), is now extended to Nd(III). Accordingly, all 57 Nd(III) complexes of high crystallographic quality (R-factor < 0.05 Å), possessing oxygen or nitrogen as directly coordinating atoms, present in the Cambridge Structural Database 2003, were considered. A subset of 15 structures was chosen by cluster analysis to constitute the parameterization training set. All 57 complexes were considered back in the validation part, and the Sparkle/AM1 unsigned mean error, for all interatomic distances between the Nd(III) ion and the ligand atoms of the first sphere of coordination, was found to be 0.07 Å, a level of accuracy useful for luminescent complex design and comparable to present day rare earth complex ab initio/ECP calculations, while being hundreds of times faster.     

Sparkle/AM1 structure modeling of lanthanum (III) and lutetium (III) complexes

The sparkle/AM1 model for the quantum chemical prediction of coordination polyhedron crystallographic geometries from isolated lanthanide complex ion calculations, defined recently for Eu(III), Gd(III), and Tb(III) (Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3299) is now extended to La(III) and Lu(III). Thus, for each of the metal ions we chose a training set of 15 complexes that possess various representative ligands of high crystallographic quality (R factor < 0.05 Angstroms) and oxygen and/or nitrogen as coordinating atoms. In the validation procedure we used a set of 60 more La(III) coordination compound structures, as well as 15 more Lu(III) coordination compound structures, all of high crystallographic quality. For both the 75 La(III) compounds and the 30 Lu(III) compounds, the Sparkle/AM1 unsigned mean error, for all interatomic distances between the metal ions and the ligand atoms of the first sphere of coordination, is 0.08 Angstroms, thus comparable to the accuracy normally achievable by present day ab initio/ECP calculations, while being hundreds of times faster.     

Sparkle model for the calculation of lanthanide complexes: AM1 parameters for Eu(III), Gd(III), and Tb(III)

Our previously defined Sparkle model (Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 2346) has been reparameterized for Eu(III) as well as newly parameterized for Gd(III) and Tb(III). The parameterizations have been carried out in a much more extensive manner, aimed at producing a new, more accurate model called Sparkle/AM1, mainly for the vast majority of all Eu(III), Gd(III), and Tb(III) complexes, which possess oxygen or nitrogen as coordinating atoms. All such complexes, which comprise 80% of all geometries present in the Cambridge Structural Database for each of the three ions, were classified into seven groups. These were regarded as a "basis" of chemical ambiance around a lanthanide, which could span the various types of ligand environments the lanthanide ion could be subjected to in any arbitrary complex where the lanthanide ion is coordinated to nitrogen or oxygen atoms. From these seven groups, 15 complexes were selected, which were defined as the parameterization set and then were used with a numerical multidimensional nonlinear optimization to find the best parameter set for reproducing chemical properties. The new parameterizations yielded an unsigned mean error for all interatomic distances between the Eu(III) ion and the ligand atoms of the first sphere of coordination (for the 96 complexes considered in the present paper) of 0.09 A, an improvement over the value of 0.28 A for the previous model and the value of 0.68 A for the first model (Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 227, 349). Similar accuracies have been achieved for Gd(III) (0.07 A, 70 complexes) and Tb(III) (0.07 A, 42 complexes). Qualitative improvements have been obtained as well; nitrates now coordinate correctly as bidentate ligands. The results, therefore, indicate that Eu(III), Gd(III), and Tb(III) Sparkle/AM1 calculations possess geometry prediction accuracies for lanthanide complexes with oxygen or nitrogen atoms in the coordination polyhedron that are competitive with present day ab initio/effective core potential calculations, while being hundreds of times faster.     

Hydrothermal synthesis and crystal structure of a novel three-dimensional mixed-valence iron coordination polymer [Fe2FeO2(IN)2(ox)] (IN=isonicotinate, OX=oxalate)

A novel three-dimensional (3D) mixed-valence iron coordination polymer [Fe₂^IIIFe^IIO₂(IN)₂(ox)] (IN=isonicotinate, OX=oxalate) (1) has been hydrothermally synthesized by using two different anionic ligands and characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectrum, electron spin resonance (ESR), X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and single crystal X-ray diffraction. Compound 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic, space group P2(1)/c with a=5.8774(7) Å, b=18.528(2) Å, c=7.7117(9) Å, V=817.69(17) Å³, Z=2, and R₁=0.0321 (wR₂=0.0777). The Fe(II) and Fe(III) centers in 1 both exhibit a distorted octahedral coordination geometry and are bridged by the IN and oxalate groups into a covalently bonded 3D metal–organic network. TGA showed that the 3D network possesses a good stability up to 291 °C.     

Tautomeric properties, conformations and structure of N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-4-amino-3-penten-2-on

N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-4-amino-3-penten-2-on (C₁₁H₁₃NO₂) has been studied by X-ray analysis. It crystallizes the orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ with a=8.834(1), b=10.508(2), c=11.212(2) Å, V=1040.8(3) Å³, Z=4, D_c=1.22 g cm⁻³ and μ(MoK)=0.084 mm⁻¹. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined to R=0.038 for 1373 reflections (I>2σ(I)). The title compound is photochromic and the molecule is not planar. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds occur between the pairs of atoms N(1) and O(1) [2.631(2) Å], and N(1) and O(2) [2.641(2) Å], the H atom essentially being bonded to the N atom. There is also a strong intermolecular O–HO hydrogen bonding [2.647(2) Å] between neighbouring molecules. Tautomeric properties and conformations of the title compound were investigated by semi-empirical quantum mechanical AM1 calculations and the results are compared with the X-ray results.     

3-Phenyl-4-benzoyl-5-isoxazolonate complex of Eu3+ with tri-n-octylphosphine oxide as a promising light-conversion molecular device

Three new europium complexes, [Eu(PBI)3.3H2O] (1), [Eu(PBI)3.2TOPO] (2), and [Eu(PBI)3.2TPPO.H2O] (3) (where HPBI, TOPO, and TPPO stand for 3-phenyl-4-benzoyl-5-isoxazolone, tri-n-octylphosphine oxide, and triphenylphosphine oxide, respectively), with different neutral ligands were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared, (1)H NMR, thermogravimetric analysis, and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The coordination geometries of the complexes were calculated using the Sparkle/AM1 (Sparkle Model for the Calculation of Lanthanide Complexes within the Austin Model 1) model. The ligand-Eu3+ energy-transfer rates were calculated in terms of a model of the intramolecular energy-transfer process in lanthanide coordination compounds reported in the literature. The room-temperature PL spectra of the europium(III) complexes are composed of the typical Eu3+ red emission, assigned to transitions between the first excited state (5D0) and the multiplet (7F(0-4)). On the basis of emission spectra and lifetimes of the 5D0-emitting level, the emission quantum efficiency (eta) was determined. The results clearly show that the substitution of water molecules by TOPO leads to greatly enhanced quantum efficiency (i.e., 26% vs 92%) and longer 5D0 lifetimes (250 vs 1160 micros). This can be ascribed to a more efficient ligand-to-metal energy transfer and a less nonradiative 5D0 relaxation process. Judd-Ofelt intensity parameters (Omega2 and Omega4) were determined from the emission spectra for the Eu3+ ion based on the 5D0 --> 7F2 and 5D0 --> 7F4 electronic transitions, respectively, and the 5D0 --> 7F1 magnetic-dipole-allowed transition was taken as the reference. A point to be noted in these results is the relatively high value of the Omega2 intensity parameter for all of the complexes. This may be interpreted as being a consequence of the hypersensitive behavior of the 5D0 --> 7F2 transition. The dynamic coupling mechanism is, therefore, dominant, indicating that the Eu3+ ion is in a highly polarizable chemical environment.     

1-Ethylthio-2-[2-thienyltelluro]ethane (L) a new (Te, S) ligand: Synthesis and complexation with Ag(I), Cu(I), Pd(II) and Pt(II) – Single crystal structures of [PdCl2(L)] and bis(thienyl) tellurium(IV) chloride

Lithium 2-thienyltellurolate, generated from 2-thienyl lithium, reacts at −78 °C in THF with chloroethyl ethyl sulfide to give a (Te, S) ligand 1-ethylthio-2-[2-thienyltelluro]ethane (L) as a red oil. The complexes [PdCl₂(L)] (1), [PtCl₂(L)] (2), [Ag(L)₂][ClO₄] (3) and [CuBr(L)]₂ (4) were synthesized. The complex [HgCl₂(L)] on crystallization decomposed giving Th₂TeCl₂ (5) [where Th = 2-thienyl], which was characterized by X-ray diffraction on its single crystals. The ligand L and complexes 1–4 exhibit proton and carbon-13 NMR spectra, which are characteristic. The coordination through Te in 1–4 is indicated by downfield coordination shifts in the position of the TeCH₂ signal of L. Complex 1 was characterized by X-ray diffraction on its single crystals. The geometry around Pd is square planar. The Pd–Te, Pd–S and Pd–Cl bond lengths are 2.5040(4), 2.273(1) and 2.322(1)/2.380(1) Å, respectively. There are intermolecular interactions between Te (coordinated to Pd) and Cl, and sulfur and Cl. The Te–Cl and S–Cl distances, 3.401 and 3.488 Å, respectively, are shorter than the sum of the van der Waal’s radii (3.81 and 3.55 Å, respectively). The Pd–Pd distance between the two molecules is 3.4156(6) Å, greater than the sum of van der Waal’s radii (3.26 Å). The structure of 5 is typical of that of a tellurium(IV) compound (saw-horse type). The two Te–Cl bond lengths are identical, 2.480(1) Å. The geometry around Te in 5 can be best described as pseudo tetrahedral (trigonal bipyramidal with a lone pair on one corner of the triangle).     

Hydrogenmaleato bridged supramolecular double chains via π–π stacking interactions: syntheses, crystal structures and magnetic properties of ∞[Cu(phen)X(HL)2/2] with X=Cl (1), NO3 (2) and H2L=maleic acid

Two novel hydrogen maleato (HL) bridged Cu(II) complexes _∞¹[Cu(phen)Cl(HL)_2/2] 1 and _∞¹[Cu(phen)(NO₃)(HL)_2/2] 2 were obtained from reactions of 1,10-phenanthroline, maleic acid with CuCl₂·2H₂O and Cu(NO₃)₂·3H₂O, respectively, in CH₃OH/H₂O (1:1 v/v) at pH=2.0 and the crystal structures were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction methods. Both complexes crystallize isostructurally in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with cell dimensions: 1 a=8.639(2) Å, b=15.614(3) Å, c=11.326(2) Å, β=94.67(3)°, Z=4, D_calc=1.720 g/cm³ and 2 a=8.544(1) Å, b=15.517(2) Å, c=12.160(1) Å, β=90.84(8)°, Z=4, D_calc=1.734 g/cm³. In both complexes, the square pyramidally coordinated Cu atoms are bridged by hydrogen maleato ligands into 1D chains with the coordinating phen ligands parallel on one side. Interdigitation of the chelating phen ligands of two neighbouring chains via π–π stacking interactions forms supramolecular double chains, which are then arranged in the crystal structures according to pseudo 1D close packing patterns. Both complexes exhibit similar paramagnetic behavior obeying Curie–Weiss laws χ_m(T−θ)=0.414 cm³ mol⁻¹ K with the Weiss constants θ=−1.45, −1.0 K for 1 and 2, respectively.     

Strong antiferromagnetism in the dinuclear 2-pyridone complex with N–C–O bridges: A paddle-wheel analogue of the dinuclear tetracarboxylates

A novel dinuclear complex [Cu₂(μ-L)₄(HL)₂] (1) was isolated from starting 2-pyridone (HL) via a resonance and a tautomeric transformation. Each copper centre is in a square-pyramidal coordination sphere, defined by two oxygen atoms (Cu–O4 1.978(5), Cu–O11 1.964(4) Å) and two nitrogen atoms (Cu–N2 2.003(5), Cu–N3 2.007(5) Å) of four bridging deprotonated pyridin-2-olates and an oxygen atom on the top from a neutral 2-pyridone (Cu–O2 2.227(5) Å), analogous to tetracarboxylate paddle-wheel complexes. Compound 1 was compared with mixed pyridin-2-olato/methanoato analogues [Cu₂(μ-HCO₂)₂(μ-L)₂(HL)₂] · 2CH₃CN (2) and [Cu₂(μ-HCO₂)₂(μ-L)₂(HL)₂] (2a) (2a is an air stable form obtained from 2 outside mother-liquid). The EPR spectra of air stable 1 and 2a show three signals H_z1, H₂ and H_z2, typical for the binuclear systems with spin S = 1, both revealing strong antiferromagnetism 2J = −334 (1) and −324 cm⁻¹ (2a). Interestingly, only for 1 additional H₁ signal at 100 mT is noticed (D(1) = 0.293 cm⁻¹ < hν = 0.320 cm⁻¹ < D(2a) = 0.347 cm⁻¹). On the other hand, several broad signals in the 100–450 mT region, only in the high temperature spectrum for 2a are observed. These results are in agreement with the magnetic susceptibility analysis.     

Studies on organolanthanide complexes : LXIII. Synthesis, spectroscopic and X-ray crystallographic characterization of new early organolanthanide, organoyttrium hydride and organoholmium hydroxide complexes

Organolanthanide chloride complexes [(CH₃OCH₂CH₂C₅H₄)₂Ln(μ-Cl)]₂ (Ln = La, Pr, Ho and Y) react with excess NaH in THF at 45°C to give the dimeric hydride complexes [(CH₃OCH₂CH₂C₅H₄)₂Ln(μ-H)]₂, which have been characterized by IR, ¹H NMR, MS and XPS spectroscopy, elemental analyses and X-ray crystallography. [(CH₃OCH₂CH₂C₅H₄)₂Y(μ-H)]₂ crystallizes from THF/n-hexane at −30°C, in the triclinic space group P1 with a = 8.795(2) Å, b = 11.040(1) Å, c = 16.602(2) Å, = 93.73(1)°, β = 91.82(1)°, γ = 94.21(1)°, D_c = 1.393 gcm⁻³ for Z = 2 dimers. However, crystals of [(CH₃OCH₂CH₂C₅H₄)₂Ho(μ-OH)]₂ were obtained by recrystallization of holmium hydride in THF/n-hexane at −30°C, in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with a = 11.217(2) Å, b = 15.865(7) Å, c = 17.608(4) Å, D_c = 1.816 gcm⁻³ for Z = 4 dimers. In the complexes of yttrium and holmium, each Ln atom of the dimers is coordinated by two substituted cyclopentadienyl ligands, one oxygen atom and two hydrogen atoms (for the Y atom) or two hydroxyl groups (for the Ho atom) to form a distorted trigonal bipyramid if the C(η⁵)-bonded cyclopentadienyl is regarded as occupying a single polyhedral vertex.     

Complex of trivalent lanthanum ion with galactitol in the solid state: the crystal structure and an FT-IR study of LaCl3·galactitol·6H2O

The crystal structure of LaCl₃·galactitol·6H₂O has been determined. It is monoclinic. The space group is P2₁/n with unit cell dimensions a=10.5091(7), b=12.5366(7), c=14.4420(10) Å, β=90.974(2)°, V=1902.4(2) ų and Z=4. Each La³⁺ ion in the unit cell is coordinated to 10 oxygen atoms, three from O1, O2 and O3 of one alditol, three from O4, O5 and O6 of another alditol and four from water molecules, with La–O distances from 2.5099 to 2.6916 Å. The other two water molecules are hydrogen-bonded. FT-IR spectrum of LaCl₃·galactitol·6H₂O is apparently different from that of other lanthanide–galactitol complexes. It is consistent with the differences between their crystal structures. Both the IR result and the crystal structure of LaCl₃·galactitol·6H₂O complex show that it has the different coordination mode compared with other lanthanide complexes.     

A triple helical calcium-based coordination polymer with strong blue fluorescent emission

A hydrothermal reaction of 1,3-dicyanobenzene and Ca(OH)₂ yielded a triple helical calcium-based coordination polymer of the formula, C₂₀H₂₅Ca_2.50O_18.50 (1). The 1,3-benzenecarboxylate anion, found in the final product was generated in situ during the synthesis by the hydrolysis of 1,3-dicyanobenzene. X-ray diffraction study shows that the complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, C2/c space group, a=15.5701(5), b=21.4445(7), c=17.1601(6) Å, β=111.7400(7)°, V=5322.1(3) Å³, Z=8, D_c=1.651 Mg/m³. The calcium atoms show differences in the coordination environments. Complex 1 emits strong blue fluorescent light (λ_em(max)=419 nm) when it is excited by UV light (λ_ex(max)=316 nm) in the solid state at room temperature.     

Tautomeric properties, conformations and structure of N-(2-hydroxy-5-chlorophenyl) salicylaldimine

The crystal structure of N-(2-hydroxy-5-chlorophenyl) salicylaldimine (C₁₃H₁₀NO₂Cl) was determined by X-ray analysis. It crystallizes orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ with a=12.967(2) Å, b=14.438(3) Å, c=6.231(3) Å, V=1166.5(6) Å³, Z=4, D_c=1.41 g cm⁻³ and μ(MoK)=0.315 mm⁻¹. The title compound is thermochromic and the molecule is nearly planar. Both tautomeric forms (keto and enol forms in 68(3) and 32(3)%, respectively) are present in the solid state. The molecules contain strong intramolecular hydrogen bonds, N1–H1O1/O2 (2.515(1) and 2.581(2) Å) for the keto form and O1–H01N1 for the enol one. There is also strong intermolecular O2–HO1 hydrogen bonding (2.599(2) Å) between neighbouring molecules. Minimum energy conformations AM1 were calculated as a function of the three torsion angles, θ₁(N1–C7–C6–C5), θ₂(C8–N1–C7–C6) and θ₃(C9–C8–N1–C7), varied every 10°. Although the molecule is nearly planar, the AM1 optimized geometry of the title compound is not planar. The non-planar conformation of the title compound corresponding to the optimized X-ray structure is the most stable conformation in all calculations.     

Structure analysis and the standard molar enthalpy of formation of a coordination polymer [Co(TO)2Cl2]n (TO = 1,2,4-triazole-5-one)

A coordination polymer was synthesized by the reaction of CoCl₂ with 1,2,4-triazole-5-one (TO) and charaterized by means of IR and TG–DTG. Single-crystal structure analysis showed that the complex crystallized in the monoclinic space group C2/c: a = 23.105(9) Å, b = 3.5683(2) Å, c = 13.589(6) Å,  = 90°, β = 124.038(4)°, γ = 90°, V = 928.4(7) Å³, Z = 4. The standard molar enthalpy of formation of the complex was determined to be (−1034.28 ± 0.95) kJ mol⁻¹.     

Structural features of 4,4′-diaminooctafluorobiphenyl

Molecules of C₁₂H₄F₈N₂ crystallize in the orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ with cell constants a=9.200(1), b=10.896(1), c=23.178(3) Å and V=2323.4(5) ų. There are two molecules in the asymmetric unit which have D₂ symmetry. However these two molecules have C₂ symmetry in central C–C bonds, separately. Intramolecular steric repulsions between F atoms and N–HF hydrogen bonds have very much affected the molecular conformation. The mean dihedral angle between intramolecular phenyl rings is 119.2(1)°. The N–C bonds have lengths 1.363(4)–1.407(4) Å with a mean of 1.388 Å. This is shorter than the conventional C–N (1.47(1) Å) bond length due to π-electron delocalizations (F.H. Allen, O. Kennard, D.G. Watson, L. Brammer, A.G. Orpen, R. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. II (1987) S1–S19).

The molecular structure of the title compound was also investigated by IR spectroscopy. It was shown that the IR spectra are in agreement with the crystal structure. On the other hand, theoretical and semi-emprical molecular mechanic calculations were carried out to obtain the most probable low-energy conformations by using MM3, PM3 and AM1 programs.