A lower estimate for the achromatic number of irreducible graphs

The achromatic number of a graph is the largest number of independent sets its vertex set can be split into in such a way that the union of any two of these sets is not independent. A graph is irreducible if no two vertices have the same neighborhood. The achromatic number of an irreducible graph with n vertices is shown to be $\text{≥(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{?0(1))log}\text{n?}\text{log log}\text{n,}$ while an example of Erdös shows that it need not be log n/log 2+2 for any n. The proof uses an indiscernibility argument.     

Some Asymptotic ith Ramsey numbers

Let G be a graph with chromatic number χ(G) and let t(G) be the minimum number of vertices in any color class among all χ(G)-vertex colorings of G. Let H′ be a connected graph and let H be a graph obtained by subdividing (adding extra vertices to) a fixed edge of H′. It is proved that if the order of H is sufficiently large, the ith Ramsey number r_i(G, H) equals $\text{[}\text{((χ(G)?1)(|}\text{H}\text{|?1)+t(G)?1)}\text{i}\text{]+1}$.     

Coverings of the complete (di-)graph with n vertices by complete bipartite (di-)graphs with n vertices I

Let n be an integer, n ? 2. A set $\text{M}$_n of complete bipartite (di-)graphs with n vertices is called a critical covering of the complete (di-)graph with n vertices if and only if the complete (di-)graph is covered by the (di-)graphs of $\text{M}$_n, but of no proper subset of $\text{M}$_n. All possible cardinalities of critical coverings $\text{M}$_n are determined for all integers n and for undirected as well as directed graphs.     

Contributions to the theory of domination,independence and irredundance in graphs

A vertex x in a subset X of vertices of an undirected graph is redundant if its closed neighbourhood is contained in the union of closed neighbourhoods of vertices of X?{x}. In the context of a communications network, this means that any vertex which may receive communications from X may also be informed from X?{x}. The lower and upper irredundance numbers ir(G) and IR(G) are respectively the minimum and maximum cardinalities taken over all maximal sets of vertices having no redundancies. The domination number γ(G) and upper domination number Γ(G) are respectively the minimum and maximum cardinalities taken over all minimal dominating sets of G. The independent domination number i(G) and the independence number β(G) are respectively the minimum and maximum cardinalities taken over all maximal independent sets of vertices of G.A variety of inequalities involving these quantities are established and sufficient conditions for the equality of the three upper parameters are given. In particular a conjecture of Hoyler and Cockayne [9], namely $\text{i+β?2p + 2δ - 2}\text{2pδ}$, is proved.     

The extremal graph problem of the icosahedron

P. Turán has asked the following question:Let I¹² be the graph determined by the vertices and edges of an icosahedron. What is the maximum number of edges of a graph Gⁿ of n vertices if Gⁿ does not contain I¹² as a subgraph?We shall answer this question by proving that if n is sufficiently large, then there exists only one graph having maximum number of edges among the graphs of n vertices and not containing I¹². This graph Hⁿ can be defined in the following way:Let us divide n ? 2 vertices into 3 classes each of which contains [$\text{(n?2)}\text{3}$] or $\text{[}\text{(n?2)}\text{3}\text{] + 1}$ vertices. Join two vertices iff they are in different classes. Join two vertices outside of these classes to each other and to every vertex of these three classes.     

Graph equations for line graphs,total graphs,middle graphs and quasi-total graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex-set V(G) and edge-set X(G). Let L(G) and T(G) denote the line graph and total graph of G. The middle graph M(G) of G is an intersection graph Ω(F) on the vertex-set V(G) of any graph G. Let F = V′(G) ∪ X(G) where V′(G) indicates the family of all one-point subsets of the set V(G), then $\text{M(G) = Ω(F)}$.The quasi-total graph P(G) of G is a graph with vertex-set V(G)∪X(G) and two vertices are adjacent if and only if they correspond to two non-adjacent vertices of G or to two adjacent edges of G or to a vertex and an edge incident to it in G.In this paper we solve graph equations $\text{L(G) ? P(H);}\text{L(G)}\text{? P(H); P(G) ? T(H);}\text{P(G)}\text{? T(H); M(G) ? P(H);}\text{M(G)}\text{? P(H)}$.     

A note on similar edges and edge-unique line graphs

If G is a connected graph having no vertices of degree 2 and L(G) is its line graph, two results are proven: if there exist distinct edges e and f with L(G) ? e ? L(G) ? f then there is an automorphism of L(G) mapping e to f; if $\text{G ? u ¦ G ? v}$ for any distinct vertices u, v, then $\text{L(G) ? e ¦ L(G) ? f}$ for any distinct edges e, f.     

Disjoint independent dominating sets in graphs

A set X of vertices of G is an independent dominating set if no two vertices of X are adjacent and each vertex not in X is adjacent to at least one vertex in X. Independent dominating sets of G are cliques of the complement $\text{G}$ of G and conversely.This work is concerned with the existence of disjoint independent dominating sets in a graph G. A new parameter, the maximum number of disjoint independent dominating sets in G, is studied and the class of graphs whose vertex sets partition into independent dominating sets is investigated.     

Triangles in self-complementary graphs

It is shown that the number of triangles in a self-complementary graph with N vertices is at least $\text{N(N ? 2)(N ? 4)}\text{48}$ if N ≡ 0 (mod 4) and at least $\text{N(N ? 1)(N ? 5)}\text{48}$ if N ≡ 1 (mod 4), and that this minimum number can be achieved.     

Lower bounds on the independence number in terms of the degrees

Wei discovered that the independence number of a graph G is at least Σ_v(1 + d(v))^?1. It is proved here that if G is a connected triangle-free graph on n ≥ 3 vertices and if G is neither an odd cycle nor an odd path, then the bound above can be increased by $\text{n}\text{Δ(Δ + 1)}$, where Δ is the maximum degree. This new bound is sharp for even cycles and for three other graphs. These results relate nicely to some algorithms for finding large independent sets. They also have a natural matrix theory interpretation. A survey of other known lower bounds on the independence number is presented.     

Hamiltonicity in (0–1)-polyhedra

The graph G(P) of a polyhedron P has a node corresponding to each vertex of P and two nodes are adjacent in G(P) if and only if the corresponding vertices of P are adjacent on P. We show that if P ? $\text{R}$ⁿ is a polyhedron, all of whose vertices have (0–1)-valued coordinates, then (i) if G(P) is bipartite, the G(P) is a hypercube; (ii) if G(P) is nonbipartite, then G(P) is hamilton connected. It is shown that if P ? $\text{R}$ⁿ has (0–1)-valued vertices and is of dimension d (≤n) then there exists a polyhedron P′ ? $\text{R}$^d having (0–1)-valued vertices such that $\text{G(P) ? G(P′)}$. Some combinatorial consequences of these results are also discussed.     

Extremal values of the interval number of a graph,II

It is shown that the interval number of a graph on n vertices is at most $\text{[}\text{1}\text{4}\text{(n+1)]}$, and this bound is best possible. This means that we can represent any graph on n vertices as an intersection graph in which the sets assigned to the vertices each consist of the union of at most $\text{[}\text{1}\text{4}\text{(n+1)]}$ finite closed intervals on the real line. This upper bound is attained by the complete bipartite graph K_[n/2],[n/2].     

On n-hamiltonian graphs

A graph G of order p ? 3 is called n-hamiltonian, 0 ? n ? p ? 3, if the removal of any m vertices, 0 ? m ? n, results in a hamiltonian graph. A graph G of order p ? 3 is defined to be n-hamiltonian, ?p ? n ? 1, if there exists ?n or fewer pairwise disjoint paths in G which collectively span G. Various conditions in terms of n and the degrees of the vertices of a graph are shown to be sufficient for the graph to be n-hamiltonian for all possible values of n. It is also shown that if G is a graph of order p ? 3 and $\text{K}\text{(G) ? β(G) + n (?p ? n ? p ? 3)}$, then G is n-hamiltonian.     

A sufficient condition for hamiltonian circuits

A theorem is proved that is (in a sense) the best possible improvement on the following theme: If G is an undirected graph on n vertices in which $\text{|Γ(S)| ≥}\text{1}\text{3}\text{(n + | S | + 3)}$ for every non-empty subset S of the vertices of G, then G is Hamiltonian.     

On diameter critical graphs

A graph G is diameter k-critical if the graph has diameter k and the deletion of any edge increases its diameter. We show that every diameter 2-critical graph on v vertices has (i) at most 0.27v² edges, and (ii) average edge degree at most $\text{6}\text{5}$v. We also make a conjecture on the maximal number of edges in a diameter k-critical graph.     

Arbres avec un nombre maximum de sommets pendants

This article is an attempt to study the following problem: Given a connected graph G, what is the maximum number of vertices of degree 1 of a spanning tree of G? For cubic graphs with n vertices, we prove that this number is bounded by $\text{1}\text{4}\text{n}$ and $\text{1}\text{2}\text{(n ? 2)}$.     

Balancing signed graphs

A signed graph based on F is an ordinary graph F with each edge marked as positive or negative. Such a graph is called balanced if each of its cycles includes an even number of negative edges. Psychologists are sometimes interested in the smallest number d=d(G) such that a signed graph G may be converted into a balanced graph by changing the signs of d edges. We investigate the number D(F) defined as the largest d(G) such that G is a signed graph based on F. We prove that $\text{1}\text{2}\text{m?}\text{nm}\text{≤D(F)≤}\text{1}\text{2}\text{m}$ for every graph F with n vertices and m edges. If F is the complete bipartite graph with t vertices in each part, then $\text{D(F)≤}\text{1}\text{2}\text{t}{}^2\text{?ct}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ for some positive constant c.     

Independence numbers of graphs-an extension of the Koenig-Egervary theorem

Let G be an arbitrary finite, undirected graph with no loops nor multiple edges. In this paper the inequality β₀?n ? β₁ is investigated where β₀ is the independence number of G, n is the number of vertices, and β₁ is the cardinality of a maximum edge matching. The class of graphs for which equality holds is characterized. A polynomially-bounded algorithm is given which tests an arbitrary graph G for equality, and computes a maximum independent set of vertices when equality holds. Equality is “prevented” by the existence of a blossom-pair-a subgraph generated by a certain subset m_i of edges from a maximum edge matching M for G. It is shown that β₀ = n ?β₁?|R| where R is a minimum set oof representatives of the family {m_i} of blossom pair-generating subsets of M. Finally, apolynomially-bonded algorithm is given which partitions an arbitrary graph G into subgraphs G₀, G₁,…, G_q such that $\text{β}{}_0\text{(G) =}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{q}\text{β}{}_0\text{(G}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$. Moreover, if arbitrary maximum independent subsets of vertices S₁, S₂,…, S_q are known, then a polynomially-bounded algorithm computes a maximum independent set S₀ for G₀ such that S=∪{S_i; i=0, 1,hellip;,q} is a maximum independent subset for G.     

An approximation algorithm for the hamiltonian walk problem on maximal planar graphs

A hamiltonian walk of a graph is a shortest closed walk that passes through every vertex at least once, and the length is the total number of traversed edges. The hamiltonian walk problem in which one would like to find a hamiltonian walk of a given graph is NP-complete. The problem is a generalized hamiltonian cycle problem and is a special case of the traveling salesman problem. Employing the techniques of divide-and-conquer and augmentation, we present an approximation algorithm for the problem on maximal planar graphs. The algorithm finds, in O(p²) time, a closed spanning walk of a given arbitrary maximal planar graph, and the length of the obtained walk is at most $\text{3}\text{2}$(p ? 3) if the graph has p (≥ 9) vertices. Hence the worst-case bound is $\text{3}\text{2}$.     

Partition relations for denumerable ordinals

The principal result of this paper provides a nearly complete answer to the following question. For which integers k, m, n is it true that whenever we have a graph G whose set of vertices is an ordered set of order type ωⁿ, then either this graph contains a complete subgraph with k vertices or the complement of $\text{G,}\text{G}\text{?}$ contains a complete subgraph whose set of vertices has order type ω^m.