Titanium Lewis Acids for Asymmetric Catalysis: Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Dichloro[diolato(2−)‐κO,κO′]bis(solvent)titanium ([TiCl2(diolato)(solvent)2]) Complexes

The complexes [TiCl₂{(R,R)‐TADDOLato}(DME)]⋅MeCN ( 3 ), and [TiCl₂{(R,R)‐1‐Nph‐TADDOLato}(MeCN)₂]⋅CH₂Cl₂ ( 4b ) (DME=1,2‐dimethoxyethane; (R,R)‐TADDOLato=(4R,5R)‐2,2‐dimethyl‐α,α,α′,α′‐tetraphenyl‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4,5‐dimethanolato(2−)‐κO,κO′; (R,R)‐1‐Nph‐TADDOLato=(4R,5R)‐2,2‐dimethyl‐α,α,α′,α′‐tetra(naphthalen‐1‐yl)‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4,5‐dimethanolato(2−)‐κO,κO′) were prepared and isolated in high yield as stable crystalline materials (Scheme 1). They constitute ideally suited and easy‐to‐handle catalyst precursors for a large number of Ti‐catalyzed asymmetric reactions, for which they have been previously generated in situ. The X‐ray crystal structures of 3 and 4b show a distorted octahedral geometry around Ti with the chloro ligands in mutual trans positions (Figs. 5 and 6). The new chiral diols α‐(1S,3R)‐3‐hydroxy‐2,2,3‐trimethylcyclopentyl]‐α‐phenylbenzenemethanol ( 13a ), derived from camphoric acid ( 5 ), and (M)‐6,6′‐dimethyl‐α,α,α′,α′‐tetraphenyl[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐2,2′‐dimethanol ( 15 ) were prepared (Schemes 3 and 4). These new ligands are able to form mononuclear complexes with the Ti^IVCl₂ fragment. The corresponding complex 14 derived from 13a was characterized by X‐ray as a mixed THF/MeCN adduct.     

Preparation of the PdCl2 Complex of TADDOP,the Bis(diphenylphosphinite) of TADDOL: Use in enantioselective 1,3-diphenylallylations of nucleophiles and discussion of the mechanism

Reaction of the tartrate-derived diol (R,R)-α,α,α′,α′-tetraphenyl-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanol (TADDOL) with chlorodiphenylphosphane gives a new bis(diphenylphosphanyl) ligand (TADDOP). The complex 4 formed with PdCl₂ has been crystallized and its structure determined by X-ray diffraction (Fig.1). The complex is used for Pd-catalyzed enantioselective 1,3-diphenylallylations of various nucleophiles which give products with enantiomer ratios of up to 88:12 (Scheme 2). Crystallization procedures lead to the enantiomerically pure (> 99:1) product 11 derived from dimethyl malonate. The structure of the TADDOP complex 4 is compared with those of other transition-metal complexes containing chelating bis(diphenylphosphanyl) ligands (Fig.2). A crystallographic data base search reveals that the structures of transition-metal complexes containing two Ph₂P groups (superpositions in Fig.3) fall into one of two categories: one with approximate C₂ symmetry and the other with C₁ symmetry (20 and 19 examples, resp.). A mechanistic model is proposed which correlates the conformational chirality (δ or λ) of the four Ph groups' arrangement in such complexes with the topicity of nucleophile approach on Pd-bound trans,trans-1,3-diphenylallyl groups (Scheme 3 and Table).     

Catalytic Enantioselective Hydrosilylation of Aromatic Ketones Using Rhodium Complexes of TADDOL-Derived Cyclic Phosphonites and Phosphites

Cyclic phosphonites and phosphites 2–4 are readily available from Cl₂PR and (R,R)- or (S,S)-α,α,α′,α′-tetraaryl-1,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanols (= TADDOLs 1 , which, in turn, are only two steps away from tartrate); the X-ray crystal structure of one representative, the phenyl phosphonite 2b , was determined. Five previously described and six new ones of the chiral P derivatives were tested as ligands for Rh^I- and Pd^O-catalyzed reactions such as hydrocarbonylations, hydroborations, and hydrosilylations of C?C bonds; while the resulting catalysts were highly active and regioselective, they did not lead to useful enantiomer enrichment in the products (Scheme 1). In contrast, hydrosilylation of phenyl and 2-naphthyl methyl or ethyl ketone by Ph₂SiH₂ (1.2 equiv.) gave, after desilylation, the corresponding secondary alcohols of (R)-configuration with up to 87% ee in the presence of 0.1 equiv. of the penta(2-naphthyl)-substituted phosphonite 3d and 0.02 mol-equiv. of Rh (Table 1).     

Preparation of Bicyclo[3.3.0]octane-2,8-dione- and Declain-1,8-dione-Derivatives

Alkylation of bicyclo[3.3.0]octane-2,8-dione ( 1 ), which is prepared by a modification of the procedure described in the literature, gives the methyl- and propynyl-derivatives 6 and 7 (Scheme 1). In addition to the method described previously (Scheme 2), 9-methyl-cis-decalin-1,8-dione 9 is obtainable stereoselectively either by cyclization of keto-acid 16 , or by aldol cyclization of keto-aldehyde 26 and oxydation of the resulting alcohols 24 and 25 (Scheme 4). The β-keto-alcohols 24 and 25 undergo a base-catalyzed isomerization; the trans-decalin isomers 27 and 28 are not detected in this equilibrium mixture (Schemes 4 and 5)l. Monoreduction of cis-dione 9 gives the endo-alcohol 25 , while 27 is the favored product of the reductin of trans-dione 10 (Scheme 4). Optically pure (+)- 25 can be prepared from (9S,10R)-monoacetal 29 (Scheme 5).     

Dichloro[TADDOLato(2−)-O,O′]titanium/Dichlorobis[1-methylethoxy]titanium-Mediated,Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Additions of Silyl Enol Ethers to Nitro Olefins and [3+2] Cycloadditions of Primary Adducts to Acetylenes

The diastereoselective, Ti-Lewis-acid-mediated, low-temperature addition of silyl enol ethers to 1-aryl-2-nitroethenes (Scheme 1) occurs enantioselectively with dichloro[TADDOLato(2−)-O,O′]titanium 3 (TADDOL=α,α,α′,α′-tetraaryl-1,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanol) (Scheme 2). At least 3 equiv. of Lewis acid are required for high conversions (yields). However, the chiral Lewis acid 3 can be `diluted' with the achiral Cl₂Ti(OCHMe₂)₂ analog (ratio 1 : 2.5), with hardly any loss of enantioselectivity! Both, the primary (4+2) cycloadducts ( B , 9 ) and the γ-nitro ketones ( A , 1a – h , 5 , 7 ), formed by hydrolysis, can be isolated in good yields and with high configurational purities (Schemes 3 and 4, and Table 1). The relative and absolute configurations (2S,1′R) of the products 1 from cyclohexanone silyl enol ether and 1-aryl(including 1-heteroaryl)-2-nitroethenes (obtained with (R,R)-TADDOLate) are assigned by NMR spectroscopy, and optical comparison and correlation with literature data, as well as by anomalous-dispersion X-ray crystal-structure determination (nitro ketone 1c ; Fig.). The nitro ketone 7 from cyclohex-2-enone and 4-methoxy-β-nitrostyrene was cyclized (via a silyl nitronate C ; Scheme 5) to the nitroso acetal 8 , and one of the bicyclic nitronate primary adducts 9 underwent a [3+2] cycloaddition to phenylacetylene and to ethyl 2-butynoate to give, after a ring-contracting rearrangement, tricyclic aziridine derivatives with five consecutive stereocenters ( 10 , 11 ; Scheme 5 and Table 2), in enantiomerically pure form. With an aliphatic nitro olefin, the Ti-TADDOLate-mediated reaction with (silyloxy)cyclohexene led to a moderate yield, but the product 4 was isolated in a high configurational purity.     

Polymer- and Dendrimer-Bound Ti-TADDOLates in Catalytic (and Stoichiometric) Enantioselective Reactions: Are pentacoordinate cationic Ti complexes the catalytically active species?

α,α,α′,α′-Tetraaryl-1,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanols (TADDOLs), containing styryl groups either at C(2) of the heterocyclic ring or in the α-position, were prepared in the usual way ( 18–22, 24, 25 ). These compounds were copolymerized with styrene and divinylbenzene in a suspension, yielding polymers ( 33–40 , Scheme 3) as beads with a rather uniform particle-size distribution (150–45 μm), swellable in common organic solvents. HOCH₂- and BrCH₂-substituted TADDOLs were also prepared and used for attachement to Merrifield resin or to dendritic molecules ( 23, 26–32 ). The TADDOL moieties in these materials are accessible to form Ti (and Al) complexes (Scheme 4) which can be used as polymer- or dendrimer-bound reagents (stoichiometric) or Lewis acids (catalytic). The reactions studied with these new chiral auxiliaries are: enantioselective nucleophilic additions to aldehydes (of R₂Zn and RTi(OCHMe₂)₃; Scheme 5, Table 1) and to ketones (of LiAlH₄, Table 2); enantioselective ring opening of meso-anhydrides (Scheme 6); [4+2] and [3+2] cycloadditions of 3-crotonyl-1,3-oxazolidin-2-one to cyclopentadiene and to (Z)-N-benzylidenephenylamine N-oxide ( → 48, 49 , Scheme 7, Tables 3, 4, and Fig. 5). The enantioselectivities reached with most of the polymer-bound or dendritic TADDOL ligands were comparable or identical to those observed with the soluble analogs. The activity of the polymer-bound Lewis acids was only slightly reduced as compared with that encountered under homogeneous conditions. Multiple use of the beads (up to 10 times), without decreased performance, has been demonstrated (Figs. 3 and 4). The poorer selectivity in the Diels-Alder reaction (Scheme 7a), induced by the polymer-bound Cl₂Ti-TADDOLate as compared to the soluble one, is taken as an opportunity to discuss the mechanism of this Lewis-acid catalysis, and to propose a cationic, trigonal-bipyramidal complex as the catalytically active species (Fig. 6). It is suggested that similar cations may be involved in other Ti-TADDOLate-mediated reactions as well.     

Nonreductive Enantioselective Ring Opening of N-(Methylsulfonyl)dicarboximides with Diisopropoxytitanium α,α,α′,α′-Tetraaryl-1,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanolate

The bicyclic and tricyclic meso-N-(methylsulfonyl)dicarboximides 1a–f are converted enantioselectively to isopropyl [(sulfonamido)carbonyl]-carboxylates 2a–f by diisopropoxytitanium TADDOLate (75–92% yield; see Scheme 3). The enantiomer ratios of the products are between 86:14 and 97:3, and recrystallization from CH₂Cl₂/hexane leads to enantiomerically pure sulfonamido esters 2 (Scheme 3). The enantioselectivity shows a linear relationship with the enantiomer excess of the TADDOL employed (Fig.3). Reduction of the ester and carboxamide groups (LiAlH₄) and additional reductive cleavage of the sulfonamido group (Red-Al) in the products 2 of imide-ring opening gives hydroxy-sulfonamides 3 and amino alcohols 4 , respectively (Scheme 4). The absolute configuration of the sulfonamido esters 2 is determined by chemical correlation (with 2a,b ; Scheme 6), by the X-ray analysis of the camphanate of 3e (Fig. 1), and by comparative ¹⁹F-NMR analysis of the Mosher esters of the hydroxy-sulfonamides 3 (Table 1). A general proposal for the assignment of the absolute configuration of primary alcohols and amines of Formula HXCH₂CHR¹R², X = O, NH, is suggested (see 11 in Table 1). It follows from the assignment of configuration of 2 that the Re carbonyl group of the original imide 1 is converted to an isopropyl ester group. This result is compatible with a rule previously put forward for the stereochemical course of reactions involving titanium TADDOLate activated chelating electrophiles ( 12 in Scheme 7). A tentative mechanistic model is proposed ( 13 and 14 in Scheme 7).     

Regio‐ and Stereoselectivity in the Lewis Acid‐ and NaH‐Induced Reactions of Thiocamphor with (R)‐2‐Vinyloxirane

The reaction of the enolizable thioketone (1R,4R)‐thiocamphor (= (1R,4R)‐1,7,7‐trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptane‐2‐thione; 1 ) with (R)‐2‐vinyloxirane ( 2 ) in the presence of a Lewis acid such as SnCl₄ or SiO₂ in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂ gave the spirocyclic 1,3‐oxathiolane 3 with the vinyl group at C(4′), as well as the isomeric enesulfanyl alcohol 4 . In the case of SnCl₄, an allylic alcohol 5 was obtained in low yield in addition to 3 and 4 (Scheme 2). Repetition of the reaction in the presence of ZnCl₂ yielded two diastereoisomeric 4‐vinyl‐1,3‐oxathiolanes 3 and 7 together with an alcohol 4 , and a ‘1 : 2 adduct’ 8 (Scheme 3). The reaction of 1 and 2 in the presence of NaH afforded regioselectively two enesulfanyl alcohols 4 and 9 , which, in CDCl₃, cyclized smoothly to give the corresponding spirocyclic 1,3‐oxathiolanes 3, 10 , and 11 , respectively (Scheme 4). In the presence of HCl, epimerization of 3 and 10 occurred to yield the corresponding epimers 7 and 11 , respectively (Scheme 5). The thio‐Claisen rearrangement of 4 in boiling mesitylene led to the allylic alcohol 12 , and the analogous [3,3]‐sigmatropic rearrangement of the intermediate xanthate 13 , which was formed by treatment of the allylic alcohol 9 with CS₂ and MeI under basic conditions, occurred already at room temperature to give the dithiocarbonate 14 (Schemes 6 and 7). The presented results show that the Lewis acid‐catalyzed as well as the NaH‐induced addition of (R)‐vinyloxirane ( 2 ) to the enolizable thiocamphor ( 1 ) proceeds stereoselectively via an S_N2‐type mechanism, but with different regioselectivity.     

Preparation and Characterization of New C2‐ and C1‐Symmetric Nitrogen,Oxygen, Phosphorous,and Sulfur Derivatives and Analogs of TADDOL. Part I

The chloro alcohols 4 – 6 derived from TADDOLs (=α,α,α′,α′‐tetraaryl‐1,3‐dioxolan‐4,5‐dimethanols) are used to prepare corresponding sulfanyl alcohols, ethers, and amines (Scheme 1 and Table 1). The dithiol analog of TADDOL and derivatives thereof, 45 – 49 , were also synthesized. The crystal structures of 16 representatives of this series of compounds are reported (Figs. 1–3 and Scheme 2). The thiols were employed in Cu‐catalyzed enantioselective conjugate additions of Grignard reagents to cyclic enones, with cycloheptenone giving the best results (er up to 94 : 6). The enantioselectivity reverses from Si‐addition with the sulfanyl alcohol to Re‐addition with the alkoxy or dimethylamino thiols (Table 4). Cu^I‐Thiolates, 50 – 53 , could be isolated in up to 84% yield (Scheme 2) and were shown to have tetranuclear structures in the gas phase (by ESI‐MS), in solution (CH₂Cl₂, THF; by vapor‐pressure osmometry and by NMR pulsed‐gradient diffusion measurements; Table 5), and in the solid state (X‐ray crystal structures in Scheme 2). The Cu complex 50 of the sulfanyl alcohol is stable in air and in the presence of weak aqueous acid, and it is a highly active catalyst (0.5 mol‐%) for the 1,4‐additions, leading to the same enantio‐ and regioselectivities observed with the in situ generated catalyst (6.5 mol‐%; Scheme 3). Since the reaction mixtures contain additional metal salts (MgX₂, LiX) it is not possible at this stage, to propose a mechanistic model for the conjugate additions.     

Synthesis and α‐Mannosidase Inhibitory Evaluation of (2R,3R,4S)‐ and (2S,3R,4S)‐2‐(Aminomethyl)pyrrolidine‐3,4‐diol Derivatives

The synthesis of 46 derivatives of (2R,3R,4S)‐2‐(aminomethyl)pyrrolidine‐3,4‐diol is reported (Scheme 1 and Fig. 3), and their inhibitory activities toward α‐mannosidases from jack bean (B) and almonds (A) are evaluated (Table). The most‐potent inhibitors are (2R,3R,4S)‐2‐{[([1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4‐ylmethyl)amino]methyl}pyrrolidine‐3,4‐diol ( 3fs ; IC₅₀(B)=5 μM , K_i=2.5 μM ) and (2R,3R,4S)‐2‐{[(1R)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐inden‐1‐ylamino]methyl}pyrrolidine‐3,4‐diol ( 3fu ; IC₅₀(B)=17 μM , K_i=2.3 μM ). (2S,3R,4S)‐2‐(Aminomethyl)pyrrolidine‐3,4‐diol ( 6 , R?H) and the three 2‐(N‐alkylamino)methyl derivatives 6fh, 6fs , and 6f are prepared (Scheme 2) and found to inhibit also α‐mannosidases from jack bean and almonds (Table). The best inhibitor of these series is (2S,3R,4S)‐2‐{[(2‐thienylmethyl)amino]methyl}pyrrolidine‐3,4‐diol ( 6o ; IC₅₀(B)=105 μM , K_i=40 μM ). As expected (see Fig. 4), diamines 3 with the configuration of α‐D ‐mannosides are better inhibitors of α‐mannosidases than their stereoisomers 6 with the configuration of β‐D ‐mannosides. The results show that an aromatic ring (benzyl, [1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4‐yl, 2‐thienyl) is essential for good inhibitory activity. If the C‐chain that separates the aromatic system from the 2‐(aminomethyl) substituent is longer than a methano group, the inhibitory activity decreases significantly (see Fig. 7). This study shows also that α‐mannosidases from jack bean and from almonds do not recognize substrate mimics that are bulky around the O‐glycosidic bond of the corresponding α‐D ‐mannopyranosides. These observations should be very useful in the design of better α‐mannosidase inhibitors.     

Enzyme‐Mediated Preparation of (+)‐ and (−)‐β‐Irone and (+)‐ and (−)‐cis‐γ‐Irone from Irone alpha®

The (−)‐ and (+)‐β‐irones ((−)‐ and (+)‐ 2 , resp.), contaminated with ca. 7 – 9% of the (+)‐ and (−)‐trans‐α‐isomer, respectively, were obtained from racemic α‐irone via the 2,6‐trans‐epoxide (±)‐ 4 (Scheme 2). Relevant steps in the sequence were the LiAlH₄ reduction of the latter, to provide the diastereoisomeric‐4,5‐dihydro‐5‐hydroxy‐trans‐α‐irols (±)‐ 6 and (±)‐ 7 , resolved into the enantiomers by lipase‐PS‐mediated acetylation with vinyl acetate. The enantiomerically pure allylic acetate esters (+)‐ and (−)‐ 8 and (+)‐ and (−)‐ 9 , upon treatment with POCl₃/pyridine, were converted to the β‐irol acetate derivatives (+)‐ and (−)‐ 10 , and (+)‐ and (−)‐ 11 , respectively, eventually providing the desired ketones (+)‐ and (−)‐ 2 by base hydrolysis and MnO₂ oxidation. The 2,6‐cis‐epoxide (±)‐ 5 provided the 4,5‐dihydro‐4‐hydroxy‐cis‐α‐irols (±)‐ 13 and (±)‐ 14 in a 3 : 1 mixture with the isomeric 5‐hydroxy derivatives (±)‐ 15 and (±)‐ 16 on hydride treatment (Scheme 1). The POCl₃/pyridine treatment of the enantiomerically pure allylic acetate esters, obtained by enzymic resolution of (±)‐ 13 and (±)‐ 14 , provided enantiomerically pure cis‐α‐irol acetate esters, from which ketones (+)‐ and (−)‐ 22 were prepared (Scheme 4). The same materials were obtained from the (9S) alcohols (+)‐ 13 and (−)‐ 14 , treated first with MnO₂, then with POCl₃/pyridine (Scheme 4). Conversely, the dehydration with POCl₃/pyridine of the enantiomerically pure 2,6‐cis‐5‐hydroxy derivatives obtained from (±)‐ 15 and (±)‐ 16 gave rise to a mixture in which the γ‐irol acetates 25a and 25b and 26a and 26b prevailed over the α‐ and β‐isomers (Scheme 5). The (+)‐ and (−)‐cis‐γ‐irones ((+)‐ and (−)‐ 3 , resp.) were obtained from the latter mixture by a sequence involving as the key step the photochemical isomerization of the α‐double bond to the γ‐double bond. External panel olfactory evaluation assigned to (+)‐β‐irone ((+)‐ 2 ) and to (−)‐cis‐γ‐irone ((−)‐ 3 ) the strongest character and the possibility to be used as dry‐down note.     

Oxidative Fragmentations of the 5α‐ and 5β‐Hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐ 3β‐yl Acetates

Oxidations of 5α‐hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐3β‐yl acetate ( 8 ) with Pb(OAc)₄ under thermal or photolytic conditions or in the presence of iodine afforded only complex mixtures of compounds. However, the HgO/I₂ version of the hypoiodite reaction gave as the primary products the stereoisomeric (Z)‐ and (E)‐1(10)‐unsaturated 5,10‐seco B‐nor‐derivatives 10 and 11 , and the stereoisomeric (5R,10R)‐ and (5S,10S)‐acetals 14 and 15 (Scheme 4). Further reaction of these compounds under conditions of their formation afforded, in addition, the A‐nor 1,5‐cyclization products 13 and 16 (from 10 ) and 12 (from 11 ) (see also Scheme 6) and the 6‐iodo‐5,6‐secolactones 17 and 19 (from 14 and 15 , resp.) and 4‐iodo‐4,5‐secolactone 18 (from 15 ) (see also Scheme 7). Oxidations of 5β‐hydroxy‐B‐norcholestan‐3β‐yl acetate ( 9 ) with both hypoiodite‐forming reagents (Pb(OAc)₄/I₂ and HgO/I₂) proceeded similarly to the HgO/I₂ reaction of the corresponding 5α‐hydroxy analogue 8 . Photolytic Pb(OAc)₄ oxidation of 9 afforded, in addition to the (Z)‐ and (E)‐5,10‐seco 1(10)‐unsaturated ketones 10 and 11 , their isomeric 5,10‐seco 10(19)‐unsaturated ketone 22 , the acetal 5‐acetate 21 , and 5β,19‐epoxy derivative 23 (Scheme 9). Exceptionally, in the thermal Pb(OAc)₄ oxidation of 9 , the 5,10‐seco ketones 10, 11 , and 22 were not formed, the only reaction being the stereoselective formation of the 5,10‐ethers with the β‐oriented epoxy bridge, i.e. the (10R)‐enol ether 20 and (5S,10R)‐acetal 5‐acetate 21 (Scheme 8). Possible mechanistic interpretations of the above transformations are discussed.     

Addition of Chiral Glycine,Methionine, and Vinylglycine Enolate Derivatives to Aldehydes and Ketones in the Preparation of Enantiomerically Pure α-Amino-β-Hydroxy Acids

Chiral enolates of imidazolidinones and oxazolidinones from the title amino acids react with carbonyl compounds to afford the corresponding alcohols in excellent yields (see Scheme 5). Furthermore, the addition to aldehydes proceeds with high diastereoselectivity to give, after acid hydrolysis, threo-α-amino-β-hydroxy acids of high enantiomeric purity. Some of the threo-α-amino-β-hydroxy acids prepared in this work are the proteinogenic (S)-threonine ( 26 ), the naturally occurring (S)-3-phenylserine ( 28 ), and (S)-3-hydroxyleucine ( 27 ) as well as the unnatural (S)-4,4,4-trifluorothreonine ( 30 ) and (S)-3-(4-pyridyl)serine ( 31 ). The N-methylamide of (2S,3R,4R,6E)-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-(methylamino)-6-octenoic acid ( 32 ), the unique amino acid in the immunosuppressive cyclosporine, was prepared by the new method. This report presents also information suggesting that both steric and stereoelectronic effects are responsible for the good stereoselectivities observed.     

Fused 1,2‐Dithioles. Part VII

The 1,2‐dithiolosultam derivative 14 was obtained from the (α‐bromoalkylidene)propenesultam derivative 9 (Scheme 1). Regioselective cleavage of the two ester groups (→ 1b or 2b ) allowed the preparation of derivatives with different substituents at C(3) in the dithiole ring (see 27 and 28 ) as well as at C(6) in the isothiazole ring (see 17 – 21 ; Scheme 2). Curtius rearrangement of the 6‐carbonyl azide 21 in Ac₂O afforded the 6‐acetamide 22 , and saponification and decarboxylation of the latter yielded ‘sulfothiolutin’ ( 30 ). Hydride reductions of two of the bicyclic sultams resulted in ring opening of the sultam ring and loss of the sulfonyl group. Thus the reduction of the dithiolosultam derivative 14 yielded the alkylidenethiotetronic acid derivative 33 (tetronic acid=furan‐2,4(3H,4H)‐dione), and the lactam‐sultam derivative 10 gave the alkylidenetetramic acid derivative 35 (tetramic acid=1,5‐dihydro‐4‐hydroxy‐2H‐pyrrol‐2‐one) (Scheme 3). Some of the new compounds ( 14, 22, 26 , and 30 ) exhibited antimycobacterial activity. The oxidative addition of 1 equiv. of [Pt(η²‐C₂H₄)L₂] ( 36a , L=PPh₃; 36b , L=1/2 dppf; 36c , L=1/2 (R,R)‐diop) into the S? S bond of 14 led to the cis‐(dithiolato)platinum(II) complexes 37a – c . (dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene; (R,R)‐diop={[(4R,5R)‐2,2‐demithyl‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4,5‐diyl]bis(methylene)}bis[diphenylphosphine]).     

Totalsynthese von natülichem α-Tocopherol. 5. Mitteilung. Asymmetrische Alkylierung und asymmetrische Epoxidierung als Methoden zur Einführung der (R)-Konfiguration an C(2) des Chroman-Systems

Total Synthesis of Naturally Occurring α-Tocopherol. Asymmetric Alkylation and Asymmetric Epoxidation as Means to Introduce (R)-Configuration at C(2) of the Chroman Moiety Based on the reductive, stereospecific ring closure of (2R,4′R,8′R)-α-Tocophcrylquinone′ or corresponding analogues with a short, functionalized side chain ( B , Scheme 1) to 1 resp. the chroman system of 1 (C), two different approaches for the introduction of the required tertiary methyl-substituted alcohol structure in the side chain of the aromatic precursors ( A , Scheme 1) were developed. The first approach uses asymmetric alkylation in three different versions featuring (a) diastereoselective steering with chiral auxiliaries I-IV (Scheme 2) attached as esters to a-keto acids, (b) intermediate transfer of chirality in an ester enolate (from 18 , Scheme 4) derived from an optically active α-hydroxy acid, (c) enantioselective alkylation of phytenal ( 20 ) and subsequent ring closure with chirality transfer (Schemes 5–7). The second approach is based on the asymmetric epoxidation of β-metallylalcohol (Sharpless epoxidation), the corresponding epoxyalcohol being converted in situ to the (S)-or (R)-chlorodiol (S)-and (R)- 29 , respectively, for isolation (Schemes 8 and 9). Nucleophilic epoxide opening with a (3R 7R)-3,7,11-trimethyldodecyl (C₁₅**) and an ArCH2 unit in appropriate sequence is used to assemble the C-framework of the target molecule via corresponding epoxide intermediates from either chlorodiol. Combined with the use of the methoxymethyl-ether function for protection of the hydroquinone system, the epoxide approach provides a short route to 1 (Scheme 10).     

Preparation of TADOOH,a Hydroperoxide from TADDOL,and Use in Highly Enantioface‐ and Enantiomer‐Differentiating Oxidations

Replacement of one OH group in TADDOL (=α,α,α′,α′‐tetraaryl‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4,5‐dimethanol) by an OOH group gives a stable, crystalline chiral hydroperoxy alcohol TADOOH (={(4R,5R)‐5‐[(hydroperoxydiphenyl)methyl]‐2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxolan‐4‐yl}diphenylmethanol) 3 , the crystal structure of which resembles those of numerous other TADDOL derivatives (Fig. 2). The new hydroperoxide was tested as chiral oxidant in three types of reactions: the epoxidation of enones with base catalysis (Scheme 2), the sulfoxidation of methyl phenyl sulfide (Scheme 3), and the Baeyer‐Villiger oxidation of bicyclic and tricyclic cyclobutanones, rac‐ 10a – d with kinetic resolution (Scheme 4, Fig. 3, and Table). Products of up to 99% enantiomer puritiy were isolated (the highest values yet observed for oxidations with a chiral hydroperoxide!). Mechanistic models are proposed for the stereochemical courses of the three types of reactions (Schemes 5 and 6, and Fig. 4). Results of AM1 calculations of the relative transition‐state energies for the anionic rearrangements of the exo Criegee adducts of TADOOH to the enantiomeric bicyclo[3.2.0]heptan‐6‐ones are in qualitative agreement with the observed relative rates (Table and Fig. 5).     

On the Mechanisms of Enantioselective Reactions Using α,α,α′,α′ -Tetraaryl-1,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanol(TADDOL)-Derived Titanates: Differences between C2- and C1-symmetrical TADDOLs – facts,implications and generalizations

The titanates derived from α,α,α′,α′-tetraaryl-1,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanols (TADDOLs, prepared from tartrate) act as catalysts for enantioselective additions of dialkylzinc compounds to aldehydes. For the standard reaction chosen for this investigation of the mechanism, the addition of diethylzinc to benzaldehyde, there is very little change of selectivity with different aryl substituents on the TADDOLate ligands (Tables 2–4, examples). With 0.02 to 0.2 equiv. of the chiral titanates, selectivities above 90% are observed only in the presence of excess tetraisopropyl titanate! According to NMR measurements (Fig. 2), the chiral bicyclic titanate and the achiral titanate do not react to give new species under these conditions. From experiments with different stoichiometries of the components, and with different achiral or chiral OR groups on the Ti-atom of the seven-membered ring titanate, it is concluded (i) that a single chiral titanate is involved in the product-forming step, (ii) that the bulky TADDOLate ligand renders the Ti-center catalytically more active than that of (i-PrO)₄Ti, due to fast dynamics of ligand exchange on the sterically hindered Ti-center (Table 5, Fig. 3), and (iii) that the role of excess (i-PrO)₄Ti is to remove – by ligand exchange – the product alkoxides (R*O) from the catalytically active Ti-center (Scheme 4, Table 6). Three new crystal structures of TADDOL derivatives (two clathrates with secondary amines, and a dimethyl ether) have been determined by X-ray diffraction (Figs. 5–7), and are compared with those previously reported. The distances between the C(aryl)₂O oxygen atoms in the C₂- and C₁-symmetrical structures vary from 2.58 to 2.94 Å, depending upon the conformation of their dioxolane rings and the presence or absence of an intramolecular H-bond (Fig. 8). A single-crystal X-ray structure of a spiro-titanate, with two TADDOLate ligands on the Ti-atom, is described (Fig. 9); it contains six different seven-membered titanate-ring conformations in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 10), which suggests a highly flexible solution structure. The structures of Ti TADDOLate complexes are compared with those of C₂-symmetrical Ru, Rh, and Pd disphosphine chelates (Table 7). A common topological model is presented for all nucleophilic additions to aldehydes involving Ti TADDOLates (Si attack with (R,R)-derivatives, relative topicity unlike; Fig. 11). Possible structures of complexes containing bidentate substrates for Ti TADDOLate-mediated ene reactions and cycloadditions are proposed (Fig. 12). A simple six-membered ring chair-type arrangement of the atoms involved can be used to describe the result of TADDOLate-mediated nucleophilic additions to aldehydes and ketones, with Ti, Zr, Mg, or Al bearing the chiral ligand (Scheme 6). A proposal is also made for the geometry of the intermediate responsible for enantioselective hydrogenation of N-(acetylamino)cinnamate catalyzed by Rh complexes containing C₂-symmetrical diphosphines (Fig. 13).     

Synthesis and Reactions of Optically Active 1,3-Diols

The ‘syn’-1,3-diols 3 , 4 and 5 with a C₇, C₆, and C₅ chain, respectively, were synthesized from methyl hydrogen 3-hydroxyglutarate ( 2 ; Schemes 1 and 2). The latter is available in (R)- and (S)-configuration. Octyl (3R)-4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate ( 17 ) is an alternative starting material for the preparation of 5 (Scheme 3.) The epoxide 20 , derived from 5 in a one-pot reaction, is a versatile synthon, which selectively reacts with a great number of nucleophiles (Scheme 4).     

Preparation and Characterization of New C2‐ and C1‐Symmetric Nitrogen,Oxygen, Phosphorous,and Sulfur Derivatives and Analogs of TADDOL. Part III

A brief overview is presented of the field of organocatalysis using chiral H‐bond donors, chiral Brønsted acids, and chiral counter‐anions (Fig. 1). The role of TADDOLs (=α,α,α′,α′‐tetraaryl‐1,3‐dioxolane‐4,5‐dimethanols) as H‐bond donors and the importance of an intramolecular H‐bond for acidity enhancement are discussed. Crystal structures of TADDOLs and of their N‐, S‐, and P‐analogs (Figs. 2 and 3) point the way to proposals of mechanistic models for the action of TADDOLs as organocatalysts (Scheme 1). Simple experimental two‐step procedures for the preparation of the hitherto strongest known TADDOL‐derived acids, the bicyclic phosphoric acids ( 2 in Scheme 2) and of a phosphoric‐trifluorosulfonic imide ( 9 in Scheme 4), are disclosed. The mechanism of sulfinamide formation in reactions of TADDAMIN with trifluoro‐sulfonylating reagents is discussed (Scheme 3). pK_a Measurements of TADDOLs and analogs in DMSO (reported in the literature; Fig. 5) and in MeO(CH₂)₂OH/H₂O (described herein; Fig. 6) provide information about further possible applications of this type of compounds as strong chiral Brønsted acids in organocatalysis.     

Synthesis of Benzo[a]heptalene

Benzo[a]heptalene has been synthesized by two different approaches. The first one follows a pathway to hexahydrobenzo[a]heptalenone 19a that has been already described by Wenkert and Kim(Scheme). Indeed, 19a was obtained in a mixture with its double-bond-shifted isomer 19b . Reduction of this mixture to the corresponding secondary alcohols 26a/26b and elimination of H₂O lead to a mixture of the tetrahydrobenzo[a]heptalenes 23a-d (Scheme7 and 8). Reaction of 23a-d with 2 equiv. of triphenylmethylium tetrafluoroborate in boiling CHCl₃, followed by treatment with Me₃N in CH₂Cl₂, generated directly 2 , unfortunately in a mixture with Ph₃CH that could not be separated from 2 (Scheme 10 and 11). The second approach via dimethyl benzo[a]heptalene-6,7-dicarboxylate ( 30 ) (Scheme 12) that was gradually transformed into the corresponding carbaldehydes 37 and 43 (Scheme 14) both of which, on treatment with the Wilkinson catalyst [RhCl(PPh₃)₃] at 130° in toluene, smoothly decarbonylated, finally gave pure 2 as an unstable orange, viscous oil. UV/VIS, NMR, and mass spectra of 2 are discussed in detail (cf. Chapt.3).