Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 1. Concept and synthesis of monosaccharide-derived monomers

It is proposed to study the influence of interresidue H-bonds on the structure and properties of polysaccharides by comparing them to a series of systematically modified oligosaccharide analogues where some or all of the glycosidic O-atoms are replaced by buta-1,3-diyne-1,4-diyl groups. This group is long enough to interrupt the interresidue H-bonds, is chemically versatile, and allows a binomial synthesis. Several approaches to the simplest monomeric unit required to make analogues of cellulose are described. In the first approach, allyl α-D -galactopyranoside ( 1 ) was transformed via 2 and the tribenzyl ether 3 into the triflate 4 (Scheme 2). Substitution by cyanide (→ 5–7 ) followed by reduction with DIBAH led in high yield to the aldehyde 9 , which was transformed into the dibromoalkene 10 and the alkyne 11 following the Corey-Fuchs procedure (Scheme 3). The alkyne was deprotected via 12 or directly to the hemiacetal 13 . Oxidation to the lactone 14 , followed by addition of lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide Me₃SiC?CLi/CeCl₃ (→ 15 ) and reductive dehydroxylation afforded the disilylated dialkyne 16 . The large excess of Pd catalyst required for the transformation 11 → 13 was avoided by deallylating the dibromoalkene 10 (→ 17 → 18 ), followed by oxidation to the lactone 19 , addition of Me₃SiC?CLi to the anomeric hemiketals 20 (α-D /β-D 7:2), dehydroxylation to 21 , and elimination to the monosilylated dialkyne 22 (Scheme 3). In an alternative approach, treatment of the epoxide 24 (from 23 ) with Me₃SiC?CLi/Et₂AlCl according to a known procedure gave not only the alkyne 27 but also 25 , resulting from participation of the MeOCH₂O group (Scheme 4). Using Me₃Al instead of Et₂AlCl increased the yield and selectivity. Deprotection of 27 (→ 28 ), dibenzylation (→ 29 ), and acetolysis led to the diacetate 30 which was partially deacetylated (→ 31 ) and oxidized to the lactone 32 . Addition of Me₃SiC?CLi/TiCl₄ afforded the anomeric hemiketals 33 (α-D /β-D 3:2) which were deoxygenated to the dialkyne 34 . This synthesis of target monomers was shortened by treating the hydroxy acetal 36 (from 27 ) with (Me₃SiC?C)₃Al (Scheme 5): formation of the alkyne 37 (70%) by fully retentive alkynylating acetal cleavage is rationalised by postulating a participation of HOC(3). The sequence was further improved by substituting the MeOCH₂O by the (i-Pr)₃SiO group (Scheme 6); the epoxide 38 (from 23 ); yielded 85% of the alkyne 39 which was transformed, on the one hand, via 40 into the dibenzyl ether 29 , and, on the other hand, after C-desilylation (→ 41 ) into the dialkyne 42 . Finally, combined alkynylating opening of the oxirane and the 1,3-dioxolane rings of 38 with excess Et₂Al C?CSiMe₃ led directly to the monomer 43 which is thus available in two steps and 77% yield from 23 (Scheme 6).     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 7. Synthesis of a monosaccharide-derived monomer for amylose and cyclodextrin analogues

The synthesis of monomers of type C (Scheme 1) is described. In a first approach, chloro-acetyl-addition to the dioxolane 2 (Scheme 2), followed by treatment of the resulting chlorides 3 (α-D /β-D 1:3) with excess AgOTf and Bu₃SnC?CSiMe₃ gave the axial C-alkynyl-glycoside 4 (31%) and the C-arylglycoside 5 (29%). The structure of the dialkyne 6 , obtained by deacetylation of 4 , was established by X-ray analysis. The yield of the C-alkynyl-glycoside was slightly improved by protecting the C(4)-ethynyl group as the triethysilyl derivative, but not by substituting the benzyl by allyl or 2,6-difluorobenzyl groups. Silylation of the diol 1 with (chloro)diethyl[2-(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl]silane ( 19 ) resulted in 90% of the monosilyl ether 20 . HO? C(3) of 20 should favor coordination of a Lewis acid to O? C(6), and intramolecular, inverting acetal opening should lead to the product of axial alkynylation. Indeed, treatment of 20 with in situ generated BuAlCl₂, followed by treatment of the crude product with 0.1M HCl in MeOH, gave the dialkynylated triol 22 in yields of 85 to 90%. Under similar conditions, the disilyl ether 21 reacted more slowly to 22 (75%). The slower reaction correlates with the assumed intramolecular interaction of the precoordinated Lewis acid with O? C(6) in 20 .     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 2. Regioselective deprotection of monosaccharide-derived monomers and dimers

The Me₃Si? C(1) bond of the bis-(trimethylsilyl)ethynylated anhydroalditol 2 is selectively cleaved with BuLi to yield 3 / 4 , while AgNO₂/KCN in MeOH cleaves the Me₃Si? C(2′) bond, leading to 5 (Scheme 1). Both Me₃Si groups are removed with NaOH in MeOH (→ 7 ), the (i-Pr)₃Si group is selectively cleaved with HCl in aq. MeOH ( → 6 ); all silyl substituents are removed with Bu₄NF ( → 8 ). Acetolysis transformed 9 into 13 , which was desilylated to 14 , while thiolysis of 9 led to a mixture 11 / 12 . The tetraacetate 14 has also been obtained from 9 via 10 . Oxidative dimerisation of either 3 or 5 , or of a mixture 3 / 5 yields only the homodimers 15 and 16 (Scheme 2); treatment of 16 with AgNO₂/KCN yielded 17 , deprotection proceeding much more slowly than the cleavage of the Me₃Si? C(2′) group of 2 . The iodoalkyne 20 , required for the cross-coupling with 5 according to Cadiot-Chodkiewicz, was prepared by deprotection of 3 / 4 to 18 , methoxymethylation (→ 19 ), and iodination. Cross-coupling yielded mostly 21 , besides the homodimer 22 . Similarly, cross-coupling of 20 and 23 (obtained from 5 ) led to 24 and 22 . The structure of 24 was established by X-ray analysis (Fig.), showing a C(6)–C(5′) distance of 5.2 Å. The conditions for deprotecting 2 were applied to 21 , and led to 25 (AgNO₂/KCN), 26 (aq. NaOH), 27 (Bu₄NF), and 29 (HCl/MeOH; Scheme 3). Attempted deprotection of the propargylic-ether moiety with BuLi, however, failed. The dimer 27 was further deprotected to 28 . Acetolytic (Ac₂O/Me₃SiOTf) debenzylation of the dimer 30 , obtained from 10 , gave 31 (83%) which was deacetylated to 32 (Scheme 4). Cross-coupling of 5 and the bromoalkyne 33 , obtained from 10 , yielded 34 ; again, acetolysis proceeded well, leading to 35 . The cellobiose derivative 38 was prepared from the lactone 36 via 37 . The glycosidic linkage of 38 proved resistant to the conditions of acetolysis, leading to 39 . Acetolysis of the benzylated thiophene 40 (from 30 with Na₂S) yielded the octaacetate 41 , but proceeded in substantially lower yields (50%).     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 26

The anthraquinone derivatives T‐x‐x ( x = 2, 4, and 8), possessing two cellobiosyl, cellotetraosyl, and cellooctaosyl chains, respectively, C‐glycosidically bonded at C(1) and C(8) were synthesised as potential mimics of cellulose I. The anthraquinone template enforces a parallel orientation of the cellodextrin chains at a distance corresponding to the one between the crystallographically independent chains of cellulose I, and the ethynyl and buta‐1,3‐diynyl linker units ensure an appropriate phase shift between them. The H‐bonding of the T‐x‐x mimics was analysed and compared to the one of the mono‐chained analogues T‐x and of the known cellulose II mimics N‐x‐x and N‐x where one or two cellodextrin chains are O‐glycosidically bonded to naphthalene‐1,8‐diethanol, or to naphthalene‐1‐ethanol. The OH signals of T‐x and T‐x‐x in solution in (D₆)DMSO were assigned on the basis of DQFCOSY, HSQC, and TOCSY (only of T‐4, T‐4‐4 , and T‐8‐8 ) spectra and on a comparison with the spectra of N‐x and N‐x‐x. Hydrogen bonding was analysed on the basis of the chemical shift of OH groups and its temperature dependence, coupling constants, SIMPLE ¹H‐NMR experiments, and ROESY spectra. T‐4‐4 and T‐8‐8 in (D₆)DMSO appear to adopt a V‐shape arrangement of the cellosyl chains, avoiding inter‐chain H‐bond interactions. The well‐resolved solid‐state CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectra of the mono‐chained T‐x ( x = 1, 2, 4, and 8) show that only T‐8 is a close mimic of cellulose II. While the solid‐state CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectrum of the C₁‐symmetric diglucoside T‐1‐1 is well‐resolved, the spectra of T‐2‐2 and T‐4‐4 show broad signals, and that of T‐8‐8 is rather well resolved. The spectrum of T‐8‐8 resembles that of cellulose I_β. A comparison of the X‐ray powder‐diffraction spectra of T‐8‐8 and T‐8 with those of celluloses confirms that T‐8‐8 is a H‐bond mimic of cellulose I and T‐8 one of cellulose II. Surprisingly, there is little difference between the CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectra of the acetyl protected mono‐chained C‐glycosylated anthraquinone derivatives A‐x and the double‐chained A‐x‐x ( x = 2, 4, and 8). The spectra of A‐4 and A‐4‐4 resemble strongly the one of cellulose triacetate I ( CTA I ). The (less well‐resolved) spectra of the cellooctaosides A‐8 and A‐8‐8 , however, resemble the one of CTA II . The similarity between the solid‐state CP/MAS ¹³C‐NMR spectra of A‐4 and A‐4‐4 to the one of CTA I , and of A‐8 and A‐8‐8 to the one of CTA II is opposite to the observations in the acetylated cellodextrin series. The mono‐chained A‐x cellulose triacetate mimics 21 ( A‐2 ), 32 ( A‐4 ), and 55 ( A‐8 ) were synthesised by Sonogashira coupling of the cellooligosyl‐ethynes 15, 28 , and 50 , followed by selective deacetylation. Complete deacetylation provided the corresponding T‐x mimics. The double‐chained A‐x‐x mimics 24 ( A‐2‐2 ), 35 ( A‐4‐4 ), and 58 ( A‐8‐8 ) were prepared from A‐x by triflation and Sonogashira coupling with the cellosyl‐buta‐1,3‐diynes 19, 31 , and 53 . Their deacetylation provided the corresponding T‐x‐x mimics 25, 36 , and 59 . The cellooligosyl‐ethynes and cellooligosyl‐buta‐1,3‐diynes required for the Sonogashira coupling were prepared by stepwise glycosylation of the partially O‐benzylated β‐cellobiosyl‐ethyne and β‐cellobiosyl‐buta‐1,3‐diyne 13 and 17 , respectively, with the cellobiosyl donor 2 and the cellohexaosyl donor 47 .     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 9. Synthesis and Thermolysis of Acetylenosaccharide-Derived 1,2-Dialkynylbenzenes

Thermolysis of the 1,2-bis(glucosylalkynyl)benzenes 6 and 16 was studied to evaluate the effects of intramolecular H-bonding on the activation energy of the Bergman-Masamune-Sondheimer cycloaromatization, and to evaluate the use of the cycloaromatization for the synthesis of di-glycosylated naphthalenes. The dialkynes were prepared by cross-coupling of the O-benzylated or O-silylated glucosylalkynes 1 and 4 (Scheme 1). Thiolysis of the known 1 , or acetolysis of 1 , followed by deacetylation ( →2→3 ) and silylation gave 4 . Cross-coupling of 1 or 4 with iodo- or 1,2-diiodobezene depended upon the nature of the added amine and on the protecting group, and led to the mono- and dialkynylbenzenes 5 and 6 , or 12, 13 , and 15 , respectively. The benzyl ethers 5 and 6 gave poor yields upon acetolysis catalyzed by BF₃ · OEt₂, while Ac₂O/CoCl₂ · 6 H₂O transformed 6 in good yields into the regioselectively debenzylated 10 . Desilylation of 7 and 13 gave the alcohols 8 and 14 , respectively. Thermolysis of 6 in PhCl gave 22 and 23 , independently of the presence or absence of 1,4-cyclohexadiene; 23 was formed from 22 (Scheme 2). Acetolysis of 22 gave the hexaacetate 24 that was completely debenzylated by thiolysis, yielding the diol 26 and trans-stilbene, evidencing the nature and position of the bridge between the glucosyl moieties (Scheme 3). Thiolysis of 22 yielded the unprotected 2,3-diglucosylnaphthalene 28 , a new type of C-glycosides. Depending upon conditions, hydrogenation of 22 led to 29 (after acetylation), 30 , or 32 . NMR and particularly NOE data evidence the threo-configuration of the bridge. The structure of 23 was confirmed by hydrolysis to the diol 34 and diphenylacetaldehyde, and by correlation of 23 with 22 via the common product 31 . Formation of 22 is rationalized by a Bergman cyclization to a diradical, followed by regioselective abstraction of a H-atom from the BnO? C(2) group, and diastereoselective combination of the doubly benzylic diradical (Scheme 4). While thermolysis of 3 in EtOH sets in around 140°, 16 did not react at 160° and decomposed at 180–220°. No evidence for intramolecular H-bonds of 16 , as compared to 14 , were found.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides

The cellobiose-derived dimer 18 , tetramer 48 , and octamer 49 have been prepared. Acetolytic debenzylation transformed the dimer 15 , obtained from the partially benzylated, dialkynylated cellobiose 2 (Scheme 1), into 16 that was deacetylated to 18 (Scheme 2), but the analogous debenzylation of the tetramer 14 proved unsatisfactory. We, therefore, avoided benzyl groups and prepared the cellobiose-derived monomer 32 by glycosidation of 27 with the crystalline trichloroacetimidates 30 or 31 (Scheme 3). The acceptor 27 was synthesised from 1,6-anhydroglucose in 7 steps (48% overall yield), and the trichloroacetimidates 30 and 31 were obtained in good overall yields from the alkynylated glucopyranoses 29 (Scheme 3). The structure of the anomeric trichloroacetimidates 30 and 31 was determined by single crystal X-ray analysis. The alkyne 34 , orthogonally C-protected by SiMe₃ and GeMe₃ groups, was transformed by a binomial strategy into the dimer 37 , the tetramer 41 , and the octamer 47 (Scheme 4). The unprotected mono- and oligomers 1 , 18 , 48 , and 49 are soluble in H₂O, MeOH, and DMSO. Their ¹H-NMR specta ((D₆)DMSO ( 1 , 18 , 48 , 49 ), CD₃OD ( 1 , 18 , 48 ), D₂O ( 49 )) show no signs of association.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides

The α‐ and γ‐CD analogues 6 and 18 , which possess a hexa‐2,5‐diyne‐1,6‐dioxy unit, were synthesised by intramolecular coupling of the bis‐O‐propargylated maltohexaoside 4 , or the analogous maltooctaoside 16 , followed by deprotection. The dialkynylated linear oligosaccharides were obtained by glycosidation of propargyl alcohol with the thioglycosides 1 and 13 , reductive cleavage of the benzylidene acetal, and propargylation of the terminal HO−C(4) group, respectively. The β‐CD analogues 23 and 25 , which possess a penta‐1,3‐diyn‐1‐yl‐5‐oxy unit, were similarly obtained by intramolecular oxidative coupling of 20 and 21 , respectively. The linear dialkynylated oligosaccharides 20 and 21 were obtained by two consecutive glycosylations, first with the maltohexaosyl‐S‐glycoside 1 as donor, and then by glycosylation of the resulting propargyl maltohexoside with the C(4)‐ethynylated donor 19 . The proximity of the terminal units of maltooligosaccharides allowed a facile intramolecular cycloaddition of the azido alkyne 29 to the isomeric triazoles 30 and 31 , which were deprotected to 32 and 33 , respectively. Analysis of the intramolecular H‐bonds in 6, 23, 25, 32 , and 33 showed that insertion of a noncarbohydrate link interrupts a single flip‐flop H‐bond.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 12. Synthesis of ‘acetyleno-saccharide’-derived cyclodextrin analogues

‘Acetyleno-oligosaccharides’ in which two terminal ethynyl substituents enclose an angle (significantly) below 180° are building blocks for the preparation of cyclodextrin analogues. This is illustrated by the preparation of a cyclotrimer and a cyclotetramer; the C₃-symmetrical cyclotrimer 18 (Scheme 1) was synthesized in 13 steps (7.7%) and the C₄-symmetrical cyclotetramer 51 (Scheme 3) in 14 steps (4.3%) from the known dialkyne 21. The solubilities of 18 and 51 in H₂O were determined by gravimetry; a saturated solution is 130 mM in the trimer 18 and 12.8 mM in the tetramer 51 . The dependence of the optical rotation of 18 and 51 in H₂O on the concentration, and the concentration dependence of the ¹H-NMR chemical shift of the signals of the ¹CH groups of 51 (D₂O) suggest that there is no significant self-association of 18 and 51 .     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 5. Studies on the cross-coupling of alkynes and haloalkynes

The cross-coupling of the homopropargylic ether 1 and the halopropargylic ethers 2a and 2b was optimized, and aspects of the coupling mechanism were studied. Coupling promoted by Pd° and Cu¹ in the presence of an amine yielded a mixture of the heterodimer 3 and the homodimers 4 and 5 (Scheme 1). Optimizations were first directed at suppressing homo-coupling. Homo-coupling is partially due to a H/I exchange ( 1 + 2a ? 6 + 7 ) promoted by CuI and an amine. The exchange, but not the formation of homodimers, was largely suppressed in DMSO. The influence of phosphine ligands was also evaluated. Weaker σ-donors (with the exception of PPh₃) lead to a faster coupling and to a higher ratio of hetero- to homodimers, with P(fur)₃ leading to the cleanest reaction. Homodimers are also formed (together with I₂ · (i-Pr)₂NH) by reductive dimerization of the iodoalkyne 2a in the presence of [Pd₂(dba)₃], CuI, and (i-Pr)₂NH. Bulky and acceptor-substituted amines reduced the extent of the dimerization of 2a , but the bulkiest amines did not promote coupling. Better results were obtained by using the bromoalkyne 2b . Neither dimerization of 2b , nor H/Br exchange between 1 and 2b were observed. Coupling of 1 and 2b was slower than the one of 1 and 2a , but gave higher yields of the heterodimer 3 . The yield of 3 and the ratio of hetero-to homodimers was greatly improved by addition of LiI; no phosphine ligand is then required. While the oxidative addition of the iodoalkyne 2a to [Pd(PPh₃)₄] ( 2a → 8a ) was rapid, the one of the bromoalkyne 2b was much slower and proceeded via the η²-complex 9 as evidenced by ¹H-NMR spectroscopy. The rearrangement of 9 to the bromopalladium σ-complex 8b follows first-order kinetics (k = 0.014 min^?1). CuBr greatly increased the rate of this rearrangement. LiI caused rapid substitution of Br by I in the Pd σ-complex ( 8b → 8a ), but not in 9 , nor in 2b . The σ-complex 8a did not react with the alkyne 1 in the presence of (i-Pr)₂NH, unless Cu^I was added. The alkynes 10 or 1 did not react with CuI and either TMEDA or (i-Pr)₂NH to yield detectable amounts of the Cu-acetylides 11 or 12 . These observations are rationalized by the mechanism shown in Scheme 3, postulating the intermediacy of the binuclear alkyne-Pd-Cu complexes C and J , and some or all of E–H , and highlighting the role of Cu^I in this coupling.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides,Part 23 , Synthesis of a Dimeric Acetyleno Cyclodextrin from a Mannopyranose‐Derived Dialkyne

The 1,4‐cis‐diethynylated α‐D ‐mannopyranose analogue 11 has been prepared from 1,6 : 2,3‐dianhydro‐β‐D ‐allopyranose ( 6 ) by alkynylating epoxide and acetal opening (Scheme 2). Eglinton coupling of 11 gave the cyclodimer 18 (Scheme 3). Crystal‐structure analysis of the corresponding bis(methanesulfonate) 19 revealed substantially bent butadiyne moieties; one mannopyranosyl ring adopts the ⁴C₁ and the other one a slightly distorted ^OS₂ conformation (Fig. 1). Hydrogenation of 18 , followed by deprotection, gave the stable butane‐1,4‐diyl‐bridged cyclodimer 21 (Scheme 3). Crystal‐structure analysis shows the ⁴C₁ conformation of the mannopyranosyl units (Fig. 2). The two butane fragments are characterised by a combination of gauche and antiperiplanar arrangements.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides Part 25

The ethynylated gluco‐azide 11 was prepared from the dianhydrogalactose 7 by ethynylation, transformation into the dianhydromannose 10 , and opening of the oxirane ring by azide (Scheme 1). The retentive alkynylating ring opening of 11 and of the corresponding amine 12 failed. (2‐Acetamidoglucopyranosyl)acetylenes were, therefore, prepared from the corresponding mannopyranosylacetylenes. Retentive alkynylating ring opening of the partially protected β‐D ‐mannopyranose 15 , possessing a C(3) OH group, gave a 85 : 15 mixture of 16 and the (E)‐enyne 17 . The alkyne 16 was deprotected to the tetrol 18 that was selectively protected and transformed into the C(2) O triflate 20 . Treatment with NaN₃ in DMF afforded a 85 : 15 mixture of the β‐D ‐gluco configured azide 21 and the elimination product 22 . Similarly, the α‐D ‐mannopyranosylacetylene 23 was transformed into the azide 26 . Retentive alkynylating ring opening of the ethynylated anhydromannose 28 gave the expected β‐D ‐mannopyranosyl 1,4‐dialkyne 29 as the main product besides the diol 28 , the triol 31 , and the (E)‐enyne 30 (Scheme 2). This enyne was also obtained from 31 by a stereoselective carboalumination promoted by the cis (axial) HO C(2) group. Deprotection of the dialkynylated mannoside 31 led to 32 , whereas selective silylation, triflation, and azidation gave a 3 : 7 mixture of the 1‐ethynylglucal 35 and the β‐D ‐gluco azide 36 , which was transformed into the diethynylated β‐D ‐GlcNAc analogue 38 . Similarly, the diethynylated α‐D ‐mannopyranoside 39 was transformed into the disilylated α‐D ‐GlcNAc analogue 41 , and further into the diol 42 and the monosilyl ether 43 (Scheme 5). Eglinton coupling of 41 gave the symmetric buta‐1,3‐diyne 44 , which did not undergo any further Eglinton coupling, even under forcing conditions. However, Eglinton coupling of the monosilyl ether 43 and subsequent desilylation gave the C₁‐symmetric cyclotrimer 45 in moderate yields.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides,Part 16, Cross-Coupling of Partially Protected Dialkynyl Monosaccharides

The dependency of the cross-coupling of orthogonally C-protected dialkynyl monosaccharides on the nature of the coupling partners has been studied. The required dialkyne 5 was synthesized from levoglucosan in six steps and 39% overall yield and transformed into 7 , 10 , 12 , 13 , and 14 by orthogonal C-deprotection and bromination (Scheme 1). Optimization of the conditions of their cross-coupling to 16 showed that yields were higher for the coupling of the propargylic bromoalkyne 10 than for the homopropargylic bromoalkyne 14 (Scheme 2). Deprotection of 16 gave the nano-crystalline dimer 20 . To obtain more highly crystalline products, the monomers 7 and 13 were coupled with 1-iodo-4-nitrobenzene to the arylated monomers 21 and 24 (Scheme 3). The 4-NO₂C₆H₄ substituent lowered the yield of the dimerizations to the mono- and diarylated dimers 26 – 28 (Scheme 4) but had no effect on crystallinity.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 3. A new protecting group for alkynes: Orthogonally protected dialkynes

Dialkynes of the type 3 (Scheme 1) are regioselectively deprotected by treating them either with base in a protic solvent (→ 4 ), or– after exposing the OH group– by catalytic amounts of base in an aprotic solvent (→ 5 and 8 ). The Me₃Si-protected 12 (Scheme 2) is inert to catalytic BuLi/THF which transformed 11 into 9 , while K₂CO₃/MeOH transformed both 10 into 9 , and 12 into 13 , evidencing the requirement for a more hindered (hydroxypropyl)silyl substituent. C-Silylation of the carbanions derived from 17–19 (Scheme 3) with 15 led to 20–22 , but only 22 was obtained in reasonable yields. The key intermediate 27 was, therefore, prepared by a retro-Brook rearrangement of 23 , made by silylating the hydroxysulfide 16 with 15 . The OH group of 27 was protected to yield the {[dimethyl(oxy)propyl]dimethylsilyl}acetylenes (DOPSA's) 21, 28 , and 29 . The orthogonally protected acetylenes 20–22, 28 , and 29 were de-trimethylsilylated to the new monoprotected acetylene synthons 30–34 . The scope of the orthogonal protection was checked by regioselective deprotection of the dialkynes 39–42 (Scheme 4), prepared by alkylation of 35 (→ 39 ), or by Pd⁰/CuI-catalyzed cross-coupling with 36–38 (→40–42 ). The cross-coupling depended upon the solvent and proceeded best in N,N,N′,N′ -teramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA). Main by-product was the dimer 43 . On the one hand, K₂CO₃/MeOH removed the Me₃Si group and transformed 39–42 into the monoprotected 44–47 ; catalytic BuLi/THF, on the other hand, transformed the alcohols 48–51 , obtained by hydrolysis of 39–42 , into the monoprotected dialkynes 52–55 , all steps proceeding in high yields. Addition of the protected DOPSA groups to the lactones 56 (→57–59 ) and 62 (→63 ) (Schemes 5 and 6) gave the corresponding hemiketals. Reductive dehydroxylation of 57 and 58 failed; but similar treatment of 59 yielded the alcohol 61 . Similarly, 63 was transformed into 64 which was protected as the tetrahydropyranyl (Thp) ether 65 . In an optimized procedure, 62 was treated sequentially with lithiated 31 , BuLi, and Me₃SiCl (→ 66 ), followed by desilyloxylation to yield 60% of 67 , which was protected as the Thp ether 68 . Under basic, protic conditions, 68 yielded the monoprotected bisacetylene 69 ; under basic, aprotic conditions, 67 led to the monoprotected bisacetylene 70 . These procedures are compatible with the butadiynediyl function. The butadiyne 73 was prepared by cross-coupling the alkyne 69 and the iodoalkyne 71 (obtained from 70 , together with the triiodide 72 ) and either transformed to the monosilylated 76 or, via 77 , to the monosilylated 78 . Formation of the homodimers 74 and 75 was greatly reduced by optimizing the conditions of cross–coupling of alkynes.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides,Part 18 , Synthesis of Cyclic Hybrids of 2,2′-Bipyridine and Acetylenosaccharides

We report the efficient construction of cyclic hybrids of 2,2′-bipyridine and acetylenosaccharides from readily available building blocks involving a double Castro-Stephens coupling of an O-protected and an O-unprotected, mono-C-silylated 1,4-cis-diethynylated 1,5-anhydroglucitol (see 2 and 6 , resp.) to 6,6′-dibromo-2,2′-bipyridine ( 1 ) followed by oxidative cyclization of the resulting dialkynes (see Scheme). UV Spectra of the C-alkynylated linear and cyclized bipyridines 8 and 10 show that these ligands complex a range of metal ions (Figs. 4 and 5).     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 6. Orthogonal protecting/activating groups in an improved binomial synthesis of ‘acetyleno-oligosaccharides’

Bromination of the monosilylated dialkynylated monomer 1a (Scheme 1), dimer 3 and tetramer 5 by N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in the presence of CF₃COOAg gave 2, 4 , and 6 , respectively, in over 93%. Similar conditions led to bromodesilylation. Either silyl group of the diprotected monomer 1c was selectively removed by bromolysis. On the one hand, bromodesilylation of 1c gave 2 in yields varying between 80 and 99%. On the other hand, bromodesilylation of 7 , obtained from 1c by hydrolytic removal of the tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl (Thp) group, yielded 91% of 8 . Mechanistic considerations suggested that the deprotective bromination should be improved by replacing the Me₃Si by a Me₃Ge group. Indeed, bromodegermylation of 1b was quantitative and ca. 60 times faster than bromodesilylation of 1c . The Me₃Si and Me₃Ge groups can be used for an orthogonal protection/activation of dialkynes. This was shown by desilylating 12 to 11 (Scheme 2), while bromination yielded 13 . Both reactions proceeded in high yields; 9 was isolated as a minor by-product of 13 . The reactivity towards bromolysis decreases in the series H-DOPS > Me₃Ge ≈ H > Me₃Si > Thp-DOPS (DOPS = [dimethyl(oxy)-p ropyl]dimethylsilyl). Orthogonal bromolysis of DOPS- and Me₃Ge-substituted dialkynes is slightly more selective than the one of Me₃Si- and Me₃Ge-substituted analogues. Coupling of 7 with the bromoalkyne 2 gave the dimer 15 (76%), 14 (2%), and 16 (4%) (Scheme 3). The binomial synthesis was optimized so that each cycle, doubling the size of the precursor, requires the minimal number of transformations (Scheme 4). The orthogonally protected monomer 1b , dimer 19 , and tetramer 22 were, on the one hand, hydrolyzed to the alcohols 18 (95%), 21 (91%), and 24 (91%), respectively, and, on the other hand, bromodegermylated to 2 (99%), 4 (97%), and 6 (93%). Cross-coupling of 18 with 2, 21 with 4 , and 24 with 6 gave the orthogonally protected dimer 19 (73%), tetramer 22 (87%), and octamer 25 (83%), respectively.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides. Part 8. Orthogonally Protected Cellobiose-Derived Dialkynes. A Convenient Method for the Regioselective Bromo- and Protodegermylation of Trimethylgermyl- and Trimethylsilyl-protected Dialkynes

The cellobiose-derived dialkynes 14 and 15 were prepared by glycosidation of the acceptor 9 with the thioglycosides 12 (82%) and 13 (85%), respectively. The acceptor 9 was prepared from the known alcohol 2 via the lactone 7 in five steps (48% overall), and the donors 12 and 13 were prepared from the alkynylated anhydroglucose derivative 10 (60% overall). Acetolytic debenzylation of 14 and 15 (→ 16 and 17 , resp.) followed by deacylation of 16 yielded 60% of the cellobiose-derived dialkyne 18 . Deacylation of 14 (→ 19 ), methoxymethylation (→ 20 ) and trimethylgermylation led to the orthogonally protected dialkyne 21 (69% overall). Protodesilylation of 21 with K₂CO₃/MeOH gave 22 (90%), while the Me₃Ge group was selectively removed with CuBr (19 mol-%) in THF/MeOH to give 20 (95%). Treatment of 21 with aqueous HCl solution led to 19 (80%). Bromodegermylation of 21 (NBS/AgOOCCF₃) led to a mixture of 23 (85%) and 24 (11%). Similar conditions using CuBr instead of AgOOCCF₃ gave exclusively the bromoalkyne 23 (93%). The temperature dependence of the δ values of the OH resonances of 18 in (D₆)DMSO evidence a strong intramolecular H-bond between C(5′)? O…?HO? C(5).     

Benzodiazepine Analogues. Part 15.1 Synthesis of Benzoxathiepine Derivatives

Stepwise cyclisation sequences have provided access to a series of novel 4-phenyl-3, 4-dihydro-1,5-benzoxathiepine-2-ones and 2-and 3-phenyl-4, 1-benzoxathiepine analogues.     

Oligosaccharide Analogues of Polysaccharides,Part 22 , Synthesis of Cyclodextrin Analogues Containing a Buta‐1,3‐diyne‐1,4‐diyl or a Butane‐1,4‐diyl Unit

The peracetylated hexaamylose (maltohexaose) 18 was obtained by an improved acetolysis of cyclomaltohexaose (α‐cyclodextrin, α‐CD, 16 ), and transformed into the benzyl‐ and 4‐chlorobenzyl‐protected thioglycosides 22 and 23 , respectively (Scheme 2). Sequential chain elongation of 22 and 23 by glycosidation of the C‐ethynylated glucosides 9 and 11 gave the α‐anomeric heptaglycosides 24 and 26 , respectively, and their anomers 25 and 27 (Scheme 3). These were transformed into the glycosyl acceptors 28 , 30 , and 31 . Glycosidation of 28 and 30 by 13 and 15 , respectively, led to the benzyl‐protected octasaccharides 32 (αα₅α) and 33 (βα₅α), and to the chlorobenzylated analogues 34 (αα₅α) and 35 (βα₅α), while glycosidation of 31 led to the 4‐chlorobenzyl‐protected analogues 36 (αα₅β) and 37 (βα₅β) (Scheme 4). Hay coupling of O‐Bn‐ and O‐Ac‐protected linear octaoses 32 (αα₅α) and 33 (βα₅α) led to the cyclooctaamylose (γ‐cyclodextrin) analogues 38 and 43 , respectively (Scheme 5). Similarly, the 4‐chlorobenzyl‐protected analogues 34 and 35 gave 39 and 44 , and the anomeric linear precursors 36 and 37 provided the cyclootaamylose analogues 48 and 50 , respectively (Scheme 6). The influence of the constitution and configuration of the linear precursors on the rate and yield of the cyclisation was relatively weak. Deprotection and hydrogenation of 38 and 43 yielded the γ‐CD analogues 42 (αα₅α) and 47 (βα₅α), where one glycosidic O‐atom is replaced by a butanediyl group, while FeCl₃‐promoted dechlorobenzylation of 39 and 44 did not affect the butadiyne moiety and afforded the acetyleno γ‐CD's 40 (αα₅α) and 45 (βα₅α), respectively. Similarly, deprotection of 48 and 50 afforded the acetyleno γ‐CD analogues 49 (αα₅β) and 51 (βα₅β), respectively, which contain one butanediyl moiety instead of a glycosidic O‐atom. MM3* Force‐field calculations evidence the strong influence of the configuration and constitution of the new γ‐CD analogues on the shape of the cavity.     

Synthesis of Neoglycolipid Analogues of the Oligosaccharide Portion of Ganglioside GM3

In order to elucidate the molecular specificity of the antimelanoma response induce by GM3 included in proteoliposome preparation, we designed syntheses of a series of neoglycolipids containing the trisaccharide portion of GM3 or its fragment. In the present paper, we synthesized two neoglicolipids containing as a lipid, a racemic glycerol unit substituted by two aliphatic octadecyl ether chains. The di‐ and trisaccharide derivatives were prepared as glycosides of the spacer by a sequence of isopropilidenation‐benzylation‐hydrolysis followed by sialylation. The condensation between the oligosaccharides and the lipid was performed by an amidation reaction.