Preparations,structures and reactions of mono-alkene alkyne complexes of rhodium(I): The crystal structures of acetylacetonato(ethylene) (hexafluorobut-2-yne)rhodium(I) and acetylacetonato(cyclo-octene) (hexafluorobut-2-yne)rhodium(I)

Mono-alkene alkyne complexes of rhodium(I) have been synthesised, and characterised by i.r., ¹⁹F n.m.r., and crystallography. Their role as intermediates in the formation of cyclohexadienes is described.     

Spontaneous disproportionation of rhodium(I) bisoxazolinates to rhodium(II)

[RhI(t-Bu2-boxate)(C2H4)2] spontaneously disproportionates to the mononuclear [RhII(t-Bu2-boxate)2], whereas [RhI(Ph2-boxate)(C2H4)2] is stable against disproportionation.     

New rhodium(I) supramolecular structures containing pyridyl and bipyridyl ligands

The use of dimeric [RhCl(CO)₂]₂ as acceptor unit in the construction of mono-, bi- and three-dimensional metallosupramolecular structures is reported.The reaction of the dimer with the alkynylgold complex [Au(CCC₅H₄N)(CNC₆H₄O(O)CC₆H₄OC₁₀H₂₁)] resulted in the mononuclear rhodium complex 1, through an unexpected transfer of the isonitrile ligand from the gold to the rhodium centres.The reaction of the linear unit [RhCl(CO)₂]₂(μ-4,4′-bipy) (3) with the diphosphine 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane (dppb) yielded the simultaneous formation of both metallomacrocycles [RhCl(CO)(dppb)]₂ (4) and {[RhCl(CO)]₂(μ-4,4′-bipy)}₂(μ-dppb)₂ (5). The use of a diphosphine with smaller bite angle, 1,1′-bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane, (dppm) formed the three-dimensional {[RhCl(CO)]₂(μ-4,4′-bipy)}₂(μ-dppm)₄ complex (6) that incorporates four diphosphine units connecting two [RhCl(CO)₂]₂(μ-bipy) linear edges. PM3 semi-empirical method has been used to calculate the optimised geometry of compound 6.     

Structural correlation between the columnar mesophase and the melt in poly(di-n-alkylsiloxane)s

Phase transitions of poly(dialkylsiloxane)s substituted with propyl and butyl groups are reported based on X-ray diffractometry. The structure in the mesophase and in the melt of polymers with 2 to 10 carbon atoms in each side chain is compared. Both phases display a linear dependence of the molecular cross-section on the length of the alkyl group demonstrating their structural similarity. By means of differential scanning calorimetry it is shown that the temperature range of the mesophase remains practically unchanged in width as well as in absolute temperature for dibutyl up to dihexyl substituted polysiloxanes.     

Synthesis and X-ray structures of water-soluble tris(hydroxymethyl)phosphine complexes of rhodium(I)

The water-soluble Rh(I)-THP complexes: RhCl(1,5-cod)(THP) (), [Rh(1,5-cod)(THP)(2)]Cl (), RhCl(THP)(4) (), and trans-RhCl(CO)(THP)(2) () have been synthesized and characterized, where THP = P(CH(2)OH)(3); - are the first potentially useful entries into Rh(I)-THP chemistry, while and are the first structurally characterized Rh(I)-THP complexes.     

Oxidative addition of dialkylphosphites to complexes of iridium(I) and rhodium(I)

The PH bond of dialkylphosphites (dimethylphosphite, 5,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxa-2-phosphorinane and 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxa-2-phospholane) oxidatively adds to irClL₂(L = PPh₃, AsPh₃) and IrCl(PMe₂Ph)₃ generated in situ to give six-coordinate hydrido(dialkylphosphonato)iridium(III) complexes, e.g. IrHClL₂[{(MeO)₂-PO}₂H] and IrHCl(PMe₂Ph)₃[PO(OMe)₂]. Addition of triphenylphosphine to a solution containing [IrCl(C₈H₁₄)₂]₂ and dimethylphosphite in a 1:2 mol ratio gives a five-coordinate hydrido (dimethylphosphonato)iridium(III) complex IrHCl(PPh₃)₂{PO(OMe)₂}, from which six-coordinate pyridine and acetylacetonato complexes IrHCl(PPh₃)₂(C₅H₅N){PO(OMe)₂} and IrH(PPh₃)₂(acac){PO(OMe)₂} can be obtained. The ligand arrangements in the various complexes are inferred from IR, ¹H and ³¹P NMR data.     

The complexation of rhodium(III) with acyclic diaminedithioether (DADTE) ligands

(103)Rhodium(III) complexes derived from seven acyclic tetradentate N(2)S(2) ligands (one diaminedithiol and six diaminedithioether ligands) have been synthesized and characterized. Structural variations in the ligand include the length of carbon backbone between the coordinating atoms (222; 232; 323; 333), the presence or absence of gem-dimethyl groups α to sulfur, and the nature of the organic moiety on the sulfurs (hydrogen, p-methoxybenzyl and methyl). For each ligand, the formation of cis and/or trans dichloro isomeric complexes was assessed. Two complexes have been further characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Preparation of the (103)Rhodium(III) complexes was conducted and overall radiochemical yields, in vitro stability and log D(7.4) values were measured. From these studies, the ligand with the 232 chain length, gem-dimethyl groups and the methyl thioether (L4) emerged as a preferred ligand for formation of rhodium complexes with trans geometry and highest radiochemical yields.     

Hydrogenation of cyclohexene catalyzed by polymer- bound rhodium(I) and iridium(I) complexes

The catalytic hydrogenation of cyclohexene using Rh^I and Ir^I polymer-bound cationic complexes as catalysts is reported, and the solvent effect in these reductions has been investigated. In most case the reaction is characterized by the presence of a solvent-dependent induction period which has been investigated and is discussed. In several cases ESR-active Rh^II species have been detected at the end of the catalytic reaction. Recycling of the catalysts led to higher catalytic activity.     

Carbonyl complexes of rhodium(I) and rhodium(III) with 2,2′-biquinoline

Novel carbonyl complexes of rhodium(I) and rhodium(III) containing the bidenate nitrogen donor ligand 2,2′-biquinoline (biq) have been prepared; they are of the types RhX(CO)₂ biq and RhX(CO)biq (X = Cl, Br, I). Cationic carbonyl and substituted carbonyl complexes of the types [Rh(CO)₂biq]ClO₄ and [Rh(CO)biqL₂]ClO₄, where L is tertiary phosphine or arsine have also been isolated. In spite of considerable steric crowding around the nitrogen atoms, 2,2′-biquinoline behaves much like 2,2′-bipyridine in forming carbonyl complexes of rhodium.     

Monocarbonyl cationic rhodium(I) complexes

Summary The preparations and characterisation of cationic complexes of the type [Rh(CO)(MeCN)(PR₃)₂]ClO₄, [Rh(CO)L(PR₃)₂]ClO₄ (L=py or 2-MeOpy), [Rh(CO)(L-L)(PR₃)₂]ClO₄ (L-L = bipy or phen) and [Rh(CO)(PR₃)₃]ClO₄ with PR₃ = P(p-YC₆H₄)₃ (Y=Cl, F, Me or MeO) are described.     

Supramolecular structures of rhenium(I) complexes mediated by ligand planarity via the interplay of substituents

The crystal and molecular structures of two Re^I tricarbonyl complexes, namely fac‐tricarbonylchlorido[1‐(4‐fluorocinnamoyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)pyrazole‐κN²]rhenium(I), [ReCl(C₁₇H₁₂FN₃O)(CO)₃], (I), and fac‐tricarbonylchlorido[1‐(4‐nitrocinnamoyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)pyrazole‐κN²]rhenium(I) acetone monosolvate, [ReCl(C₁₇H₁₂ClN₄O₃)(CO)₃]·C₃H₆O, (II), are reported. The complexes form centrosymmetric dimers that are linked into one‐dimensional columns by C—H…Cl and N—O…H interactions in (I) and (II), respectively. C—H…Cl interactions in (II) generate two R₂¹(7) loops that merge into a single R₂¹(10) loop. These interactions involve the alkene, pyrazole and benzene rings, hence restricting the ligand rotation and giving rise to a planar conformation. Unlike (II), complex (I) exhibits a twisted conformation of the ligand and a pair of molecules forms a centrosymmetric dimer with an R₂²(10) loop via C—H…O interactions. The unique supramolecular structures of (I) and (II) are determined by their planarity and weak interactions. The planar conformation of (II) provides a base for appreciable π–π stacking interactions compared to (I). In addition, an N—O…π interaction stabilizes the supramolecular structure of (II). We report herein the first n→π* interactions of Re^I tricarbonyl complexes, which account for 0.33 kJ mol⁻¹. Intermolecular C—H…Cl and C—H…O interactions are present in both complexes, with (II) showing a greater preference for these interactions compared to (I), with cumulative contributions of 48.7 and 41.5%, respectively. The influence of inductive (fluoro) and/or resonance (nitro) effects on the π‐stacking ability was further supported by LOLIPOP (localized orbital locator‐integrated π over plane) analysis. The benzene ring of (II) demonstrated a higher π‐stacking ability compared to that of (I), which is supported by the intrinsic planar geometry. The HOMA (harmonic oscillator model of aromaticity) index of (I) revealed more aromaticity with respect to (II), suggesting that NO₂ greatly perturbed the aromaticity. The Hirshfeld fingerprint (FP) plots revealed the preference of (II) over (I) for π–π contacts, with contributions of 6.8 and 4.4%, respectively.     

Intramolecular rearrangement in diphenylfulvene complexes of iridium(I) and rhodium(I)

Variable temperature NMR spectra of the complexes [M(C₅H₄CPh₂)(C₈H₁₂)]X (C₅H₄CPh₂ = 6,6-diphenylfulvene; C₈H₁₂ = 1,5-cyclooctadiene; M = Ir, X = PF₆; M = Rh, X = ClO₄) provide evidence of intramolecular rearrangement involving rotation of the diphenylfulvene ligand about the metal-fulvene axis. Rearrangement is slow on the NMR time-scale for both complexes at 223 K: spectra recorded at higher temperatures indicate that the barrier to rotation of the diphenylfulvene ligand is lower for the iridium than for the rhodium complex.     

Synthesis of N,O-heterocyclic carbene and coordination to rhodium(I) and copper(I)

5,7-Di-tert-butyl-3-phenyl benzoxazolium tetrafluoroborate 1 could be prepared by simple reaction of the corresponding aminophenol with triethyl orthoformate under acidic conditions. Both rhodium(I) and copper(I) complexes with benzoxazol-2-ylidene ligand were then efficiently synthesised in a straightforward and smooth manner involving the reaction of benzoxazolium salt 1 with metal precursor and an external base. The complexes have been fully characterised and used in metal-catalysed hydrosilylation of ketones, where they showed poor catalytic activity, presumably due to low stability of the complexes under those conditions.     

Multiple state emission from rhodium(I) and iridium(I) complexes

The effect of temperature (2–100 K) on the emission spectra and lifetimes of [M(2 = phos)₂]ClO₄ (M = Rh(I), Ir(I): 2 = phos is cis-1,2-bis-(diphenylphosphino)ethylene) is interpreted with a two-level spin-orbit-split emitting manifold. For [Ir(2 = phos)₂]ClO₄, Δ? = 143cm^?1, τ(lower) = 999μs, and τ(higher) = 1.54 μs. For the rhodium species, Δ? = 35 cm^?1, τ(lower) = 5920 μs, and τ(higher) = 20.3 μs.