A ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complex with a weakly bonded methanol ligand

The title di­phenyl­carbene porphyrin complex (di­phenyl­carbenyl‐κC)(methanol‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­por­phy­rin­ato‐κ⁴N)ruthenium(II) methanol solvate, [Ru­(C₁₃H₁₀)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)(CH₄O)]·CH₄O, has a six‐coordinate Ru atom with a methanol mol­ecule as the second axial ligand. The carbene fragment is slightly distorted from an ideal sp² configuration, with a C(phenyl)—C(carbene)—C(phenyl) angle of 112.2 (3)°. The Ru—C bond length of 1.845 (3) Å is comparable with other carbene complexes. The two phenyl rings of the carbene ligand are perpendicular to the carbene plane. Methanol solvate mol­ecules link the methanol ligands of adjacent porphyrin complexes via hydrogen bonds.     

The first metalloporphyrin dimer linked by a bridging phenylenedicarbene ligand

In the first bis­[ruthenium(II)–porphyrin]–dicarbene complex, μ‐[1,4‐phenyl­ene­bis(phenyl­methyl­idene‐κC)]bis­[(ethanol‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)ruthenium(II)] 1,2‐di­chloro­ethane trisolvate, [Ru₂(C₂₀H₁₄)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)₂(C₂H₆O)₂]·3C₂H₄Cl₂, an inversion center is located at the center of the μ‐phenyl­ene group, leading to a parallel arrangement for the pair of porphyrin ring systems. The bond lengths and angles compare favourably with literature values for ruthenium–porphyrin–monocarbene complexes; the Ru=C(carbene) bond length and the C(phenyl)—C(carbene)—C(phenyl­ene) angle are 1.865 (3) Å and 112.3 (3)°, respectively. The Ru^II ion is displaced out of the C₂₀N₄ porphyrin least‐squares plane (by 0.2373 Å) toward the bridging ligand of the C_i‐symmetry dimer. The porphyrin ring systems of the dimer thus exhibit mildly domed conformations.     

A five‐coordinate ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complex: [bis(3‐trifluoromethylphenyl)methylene‐κC](5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolylporphyrinato‐κ4N)ruthenium(II)

The stable title tri­fluoro­methyl‐substituted carbenyl metalloporphyrin, [Ru(C₁₅H₈F₆)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)], has a five‐coordinate Ru atom which is displaced from the porphyrin N₄ plane towards the axial carbene ligand by 0.230 (3) Å. The Ru—C(carbene) bond coincides with a crystallographic twofold axis and its length of 1.841 (6) Å is notably shorter than the value of 1.868 (3) Å in the pyridine adduct.     

A chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine)­ruthenium(II) complex

The aldehyde moiety in the title complex, chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ³N)ruthenium(II)–chloro­(2‐pyridine­carboxyl­ic acid‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine‐κ³N)­ruthenium(II)–perchlorate–chloro­form–water (1.8/0.2/2/1/1), [RuCl­(C₆H₅NO)­(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_1.8[RuCl­(C₆H₅­NO₂)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_0.2­(ClO₄)₂·­CHCl₃·­H₂O, is a structural model of substrate coordination to a transfer hydrogenation catalyst. The title complex features two independent Ru^II complex cations that display very similar distorted octahedral coordination provided by the three N atoms of the 2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine ligand, the N and O atoms of the 2‐pyridine­carbox­aldehyde (pyCHO) ligand and a chloride ligand. One of the cation sites is disordered such that the aldehyde group is replaced by a 20 (1)% contribution from a carboxyl­ic acid group (aldehyde H replaced by carboxyl O—H). Notable dimensions in the non‐disordered complex cation are Ru—N 2.034 (2) Å and Ru—O 2.079 (2) Å to the pyCHO ligand and O—C 1.239 (4) Å for the pyCHO carbonyl group.     

Enantiomorphs of a carbene–ruthenium(II)–porphyrin complex with four `chiral pillars'

The chiral metalloporphyrin (dibenzoylmethylene‐κC)(ethanol‐κO){5,10,15,20‐tetrakis[(1S,4R,5R,8S)‐1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8‐octahydro‐1,4:5,8‐dimethanoanthracen‐9‐yl]porphyrinato‐κ⁴N}ruthenium(II)–ethanol–dichloromethane (1/2/2), [Ru(C₈₄H₇₆N₄)(C₁₅H₁₀O₂)(C₂H₆O)]·2C₂H₆O·2CH₂Cl₂, and its enantiomorph were prepared from enantiomerically pure porphyrins. The enantiomers are potential versatile catalysts for asymmetric cyclopropanation, aziridination or epoxidation. In each compound, the rather large dibenzoylcarbene group is squeezed between four columnar 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8‐octahydro‐1,4:5,8‐dimethanoanthracen‐9‐yl groups at the meso positions resulting in a doming deformation of the porphyrin core. The dibenzoylcarbene group has an anti conformation. The benzoyl O atoms make short van der Waals contacts (< 2.6 Å) with the methine groups of the chiral columnar substituents at the 10 and 20 positions of the porphyrin rings. A hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular chain is formed parallel to the b axis by interactions between the benzoyl O atom and the hydroxy groups of the coordinated and uncoordinated ethanol molecules.     

Partially oxidized ruthenium phosphine thiol­ates: [Ru(pySO2)0.33(pyS)1.67(dppe)] and [Ru(pySO2)0.355(pyS)1.645(dppp)]

The crystal structures of [1,3‐bis­(diphenyl­phosphino)ethane‐κ²P,P′](pyridine‐2‐sulfinato‐κ²N,S)(pyridine‐2‐thiol­ato‐κ²N,S)ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₅H₄NO₂S)_0.33(C₅H₄NS)_1.67(C₂₆H₂₄P₂)] or [Ru(pySO₂)_1−x(pyS)_1+x(dppe)] (x = 0.67), (I), and [1,3‐bis­(diphenyl­phosphino)propane‐κ²P,P′](pyridine‐2‐sulfinato‐κ²N,S)(pyridine‐2‐thiol­ato‐κ²N,S)ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₅H₄NO₂S)_0.355(C₅H₄NS)_1.645(C₂₇H₂₆P₂)] or [Ru(pySO₂)_1−x(pyS)_1+x(dppp)] (x = 0.645), (II), are composed of neutral distorted octa­hedral Ru^II complexes with chelating pyridine‐2‐thiol­ate, pyridine‐2‐sulfinate and biphosphine ligands. The S atoms are trans to each other, while pairs of P and N atoms are in cis positions. Partial double‐bond character is observed for C—S. The crystal packing consists of monolayers stabilized by C—H⋯O and C—H⋯S inter­actions, and is affected by the alkyl‐chain lengths.     

Hydro­gen‐bonded supramolecular lattice of the 1:3:4 complex between [5,10,15,20‐meso‐tetrakis(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­porphyrinato‐κ4N]­zinc(II), dibenzo‐24‐crown‐8 and methanol

The title compound, [5,10,15,20‐meso‐tetrakis(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N]­zinc(II) tris(dibenzo‐24‐crown‐8) methanol tetrasolvate, [Zn(C₄₄H₂₈N₄O₄)]·3C₂₄H₃₂O₈·4CH₄O, was synthesized and its molecular structure precisely charac­terized by low‐temperature single‐crystal analysis. All the components are involved in hydrogen bonding with each other, thus forming an extensively hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular lattice. The functionalized porphyrin moiety coordinates both equatorially and axially to the neighboring species.     

Magnesium iodide–4,4′‐bipyridine–water (1/3/4) and strontium iodide–4,4′‐bipyridine–propan‐1‐ol (1/2.5/2)

Both of the title compounds, catena‐poly­[[[tetra­aqua­magnesium(I)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N:N′] diiodide bis(4,4′‐bi­pyridine) solvate], {[Mg(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₄]I₂·2C₁₀H₈N₂}_n, (I), and catena‐poly­[[[μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐bis­[di­iodo­bis­(propan‐1‐ol)­strontium(I)]]‐di‐μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐κ⁴N:N′] bis(4,4′‐bi­pyri­dine) solvate], {[Sr₂I₄(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃(C₃H₈O)₄]·2C₁₀H₈N₂}_n, (II), are one‐dimensional polymers which are single‐ and double‐stranded, respectively, the metal atoms being linked by the 4,4′‐bi­pyridine moieties. The Mg complex, (I), is [cis‐{(H₂O)₄Mg(N‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐N′)_(2/2)}]_(∞|∞)I₂·4,4′‐bi­pyridine and Mg has a six‐coordinate quasi‐octahedral coordination environment. The Sr complex, (II), is isomorphous with its previously defined Ba counterpart [Kepert, Waters & White (1996). Aust. J. Chem. 49 , 117–135], being [(propan‐1‐ol)₂I₂Sr(N‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐N′)_(3/2)]_(∞|∞)·4,4′‐bi­pyridine, with the I atoms trans‐axial in a seven‐coordinate pentagonal–bipyramidal Sr environment.     

(Nitro‐κN)[2‐(phenyldiazenyl‐κN2)pyridine‐κN](2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ3N)ruthenium(II) tetrafluoroborate

The Ru—N bond distances in the title complex, [Ru(NO₂)(C₁₁H₉N₃)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]BF₄ or [Ru(NO₂)(tpy)(azpy)]BF₄, [tpy is 2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine and azpy is 2‐(phenyl­azo)­pyridine], are Ru—N_py 2.063 (4), Ru—N_azo 2.036 (4), Ru—N_nitro 2.066 (3) Å, and Ru—N_tpy 2.082 (4), 1.982 (3) and 2.074 (4) Å. The azo N atom is trans to the nitro group. The azo N=N bond length is 1.265 (5) Å, which is the shortest found in such complexes to date. This indicates a multiple bond between Ru and the N atom of the nitro group, and π‐­backbonding [dπ(Ru) π*(azo)] is decreased.     

A new chain‐like cadmium(II) coordination polymer containing chains of water mol­ecules

The title cadmium(II) polymer, catena‐poly[[[bis­(4‐amino­pyridine‐κN)­aqua­cadmium(II)]‐μ‐1,4‐phenyl­enediacetato‐κ⁴O,O′:O′′,O′′′] dihydrate], {[Cd(C₁₀H₈O₄)(C₅H₆N₂)₂(H₂O)]·2H₂O}_n, comprises one‐dimensional wave‐like chains, in which the Cd atom is coordinated by 1,4‐phenyl­enediacetate and 4‐amino­pyridine molecules. The 1,4‐phenylenediacetate ligands lie about inversion centres. Extensive hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions between the chains lead to a three‐dimensional structure. Free water mol­ecules form chains in the structure.     

[(1R,2R)‐1,2‐Di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ2N,N′](α‐di­imine‐κ2N,N′)­platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), where α‐di­imine is 2,2′‐bi­pyridine and 1,10‐phen­anthroline

The title Pt^II complexes, viz. (2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N,N′)[(1R,2R)‐1,2‐di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ²N,N′]­platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), [Pt(C₆H₁₄N₂)(C₁₀H₈N₂)](PF₆)₂, and [(1R,2R)‐1,2‐di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ²N,N′](1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), [Pt(C₆H₁₄N₂)(C₁₂H₈N₂)](PF₆)₂, containing an aromatic α‐di­imine and a non‐planar di­amino­cyclo­hexane, both form a ladder‐type structure, which is constructed via loose π–π stacking on the α‐di­imine ligands and hydrogen bonding between the cyclic amines and the counter‐anions. In the former compound, there are two independent complex cations, both of which have a twofold axis through the Pt atom.     

Clathrate solvates of tetra­kis(4‐methoxy­carbonyl­phenyl)porphyrin and its zinc(II)–pyridine complex,in which the porphyrin host structures are stabilized by porphyrin–porphyrin stacking and C—H⋯O attractions

Tetra­kis(4‐methoxy­carbonyl­phenyl)porphyrin, or tetra­methyl 4,4′,4′′,4′′′‐porphyrin‐5,10,15,20‐tetra­benzoate, crystallizes as a nitro­benzene 1.9‐solvate, C₅₂H₃₈N₄O₈·1.9C₆H₅NO₂, (I). The solvent mol­ecules are contained in extended channels which propagate through the host lattice between parallel screw/glide‐related columns of offset‐stacked porphyrin entities. Side packing of these columns involves π–π inter­actions between the methoxy­carbonyl­phenyl residues. Mol­ecules of the porphyrin host lie on crystallographic inversion centres. The zinc(II)–pyridine derivative pyridine­(tetra­methyl 4,4′,4′′,4′′′‐porphyrin‐5,10,15,20‐tetra­benzoato)zinc(II), [Zn(C₅₂H₃₆N₄O₈)(C₅H₅N)], (II), is a square‐pyramidal five‐coordinate complex with pyridine as an apical ligand, which crystallizes as a chloro­form–pyridine solvate. The metallo­porphyrin–pyridine units form an open layered arrangement, occluding the non‐coordinated solvent moieties within the intra­layer inter­porphyrin voids. Within such arrays, the host porphyrin mol­ecules are in contact with one another through the peripheral methoxy­carbonyl substituents. The crystal packing consists of a bilayered arrangement of inversion‐related porphyrin layers, with the axial ligands mutually penetrating into the voids of neighbouring arrays and tight offset stacking of these bilayers.     

(η6‐Hexamethylbenzene)(mesidine)­ditriflatoruthenium(II)

The crystal structure of the title complex, (η⁶‐hexamethylbenzene)bis(trifluoromethanesulfonato‐O)(2,4,6‐trimethylanil­ine‐N)ruthenium(II), [Ru(CF₃O₃S)₂(C₁₂H₁₈)(C₉H₁₃N)], is described. The complex has the classic three‐legged piano‐stool structure with a planar arene 1.667 Å from the metal, two monodentate O‐bound tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate ligands [Ru—O 2.169 (2) and 2.174 (2) Å] and one N‐bound mesidine ligand [Ru—N 2.198 (2) Å]. The Ru—N distance is relatively long and the average Ru—O distance is relatively short when compared with previously characterized Ru^II complexes.     

Tetra‐μ‐2‐fluoro­benzoato‐bis[aqua(4,4′‐bi­pyridine)(2‐fluorobenzoato)lanthanum(III)]

Each La³⁺ ion in the title complex, tetra‐μ‐2‐fluorobenzoato‐κ¹⁰O:O′;O:O,O′;O:O′;O,O′:O′‐bis[aqua(4,4′‐bipy­ridine‐κN)(2‐fluorobenzoato‐κO)lanthanum(II)], [La(C₇H₄FO₂)₆(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)₂], is coordinated by six O atoms from the carboxyl­ate groups of five 2‐fluoro­benzoate ligands, one O atom from a water mol­ecule and one N atom from a 4,4′‐bi­pyridine mol­ecule, thus forming a dimeric mol­ecule. An infinite one‐dimensional dimeric supramolecular chain is formed via intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

Bis­(saccharinato‐κN)zinc(II) com­plexes with N,N′‐bidentate 2‐amino­methyl­pyridine and 2‐amino­ethylpyridine

The structures of trans‐bis[2‐(amino­methyl)­pyridine‐κ²N,N′]­bis­(saccharinato‐κN)­zinc(II), [Zn(C₇H₄NO₃S)₂(C₆H₈N₂)₂], (I), and [2‐(amino­ethyl)­pyridine‐κ²N,N′]bis­(saccharinato‐κN)­zinc(II), [Zn(C₇H₄NO₃S)₂(C₇H₁₀N₂)], (II), exhibit octa‐ and tetrahedrally coordinated Zn^II atoms, respectively. The di­amine ligands behave as N,N′‐bidentate ligands, while saccharinate (sac) is coordinated through the N atom. In (I), the complex lies about an inversion centre with the Zn atom disordered and displaced by 0.256 (2) Å from a centre of symmetry towards a sac N atom. The crystal structure of (I) is stabilized by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and the crystal packing of (II) is determined by hydrogen bonding as well as weak π–π stacking interactions between the sac ligands.     

5‐n‐Butylpyridine‐2‐carboxylate–copper(II) and –iron(III) complexes

In trans‐bis(5‐n‐butyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­bis­(methanol‐κO)copper(II), [Cu(C₁₀H₁₂NO₂)₂(CH₄O)₂], the Cu atom lies on a centre of symmetry and has a distorted octahedral coordination. The Cu—O(methanol) bond length in the axial direction is 2.596 (3) Å, which is much longer than the Cu—­O(carboxylate) and Cu—N distances in the equatorial plane [1.952 (2) and 1.977 (2) Å, respectively]. In mer‐tris(5‐n‐bu­tyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­iron(III), [Fe(C₁₀H₁₂NO₂)₃], the Fe atom also has a distorted octahedral geometry, with Fe—O and Fe—N bond‐length ranges of 1.949 (4)–1.970 (4) and 2.116 (5)–2.161 (5) Å, respectively. Both crystals are stabilized by stacking interactions of the 5‐n‐butyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ate ligand, although hydrogen bonds also contribute to the stabilization of the copper(II) complex.     

The first phosphite complex of a metalloporphyrin

(Di­phenyl phosphite‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra­phenyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)­manganese(III) hexa­fluoro­antimonate(V), [Mn(C₄₄H₂₈N₄)(C₁₂H₁₁O₃P)](SbF₆), is the first example of a structurally characterized di­aryl or di­alkyl phosphite complex of a metal–porphyrin ion. The axial phosphite ligand binds to the Mn^III ion via the P=O O atom, affording a nominally five‐coordinate complex with an Mn—O distance of 2.120 (4) Å. The mean porphyrin Mn—N distance is 2.000 (4) Å and the Mn^III ion is displaced from the 24‐atom porphyrin mean plane by 0.1548 (13) Å towards the axial O atom. The porphyrin adopts a marked saddle conformation, with a small domed component. The saddle distortion of the porphyrin ligand reflects the tight back‐to‐back dimers formed in the lattice by pairs of neighboring cations. The `non‐covalent' dimers in the lattice exhibit an unusual (weak) η²‐type coordination of a pyrrole C=C bond from a neighboring mol­ecule, with Mn^III⃛C distances of 3.697 (5) and 3.537 (5) Å.     

Aqua(dipicolinato‐κ3O2,N,O6)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)manganese(II) monohydrate

In the title compound [systematic name: aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)(pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ³O²,N,O⁶)manganese(II) monohydrate, [Mn(C₇H₃NO₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)]·H₂O, the manganese(II) centre is surrounded by one bidentate phenanthroline ligand [Mn—N = 2.248 (3) and 2.278 (3) Å], one tridentate dipicolinate ligand [Mn—N = 2.179 (3) Å, and Mn—O = 2.237 (2) and 2.266 (2) Å] and one water mol­ecule [Mn—O = 2.117 (3) Å], and it exhibits a strongly distorted octahedral geometry, with trans angles ranging from 144.12 (9) to 158.88 (11)°. Extensive intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving coordinated and uncoordinated water mol­ecules and the carboxyl O atoms of the dipicolinate ligand, as well as a stacking interaction involving the phenanthroline rings, are observed in the crystal structure.     

Carbonyl­[di­hydro­bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN2)­borato]­hydrido­bis­(tri‐p‐tolyl­phosphine‐κP)­ruthenium(II)

The title compound, [RuH(C₆H₈BN₄)(C₂₁H₂₁P)₂(CO)], possesses two trans‐disposed tri‐p‐tolyl­phosphines in axial positions and the remaining ligands in equatorial positions. The overall geometry of the Ru^II ion is a distorted octahedral structure. The P—Ru—P axis deviates from linearity by about 13°. This distortion arises mainly from the steric congestion between the bulky phosphine moieties and the tetrahedral di­hydro­bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl)­borate ligands.     

A polymeric zinc thio­sulfate complex containing anionic and cationic chains based on tetra­hedral and octa­hedral zinc sites

catena‐Poly[[[tetra­aqua­zinc(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ²N:N′] [[μ‐thio­sulfato‐κ²O:S‐bis­[(thio­sulfato‐κS)zinc(II)]]‐di‐μ‐4,4′‐pyridine‐κ⁴N:N′] dihydrate], {[Zn(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₄][Zn₂(S₂O₃)₃(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂]·2H₂O}_n, is a polymeric zinc complex built up from thio­sulfate‐containing anionic chains, where the Zn atom is tetra­hedrally coordinated, and aqua‐containing cationic chains incorporating octa­hedrally coordinated Zn. In each type of chain, the 4,4′‐bipyridine units act as spacers, and the chains run along three non‐inter­secting almost orthogonal directions in space. The profusion of hydrogen‐bond donors (all the H atoms of the water mol­ecules) and acceptors (the thio­sulfate O and S atoms) generates a very complex hydrogen‐bonding scheme.