The first metalloporphyrin dimer linked by a bridging phenylenedicarbene ligand

In the first bis­[ruthenium(II)–porphyrin]–dicarbene complex, μ‐[1,4‐phenyl­ene­bis(phenyl­methyl­idene‐κC)]bis­[(ethanol‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)ruthenium(II)] 1,2‐di­chloro­ethane trisolvate, [Ru₂(C₂₀H₁₄)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)₂(C₂H₆O)₂]·3C₂H₄Cl₂, an inversion center is located at the center of the μ‐phenyl­ene group, leading to a parallel arrangement for the pair of porphyrin ring systems. The bond lengths and angles compare favourably with literature values for ruthenium–porphyrin–monocarbene complexes; the Ru=C(carbene) bond length and the C(phenyl)—C(carbene)—C(phenyl­ene) angle are 1.865 (3) Å and 112.3 (3)°, respectively. The Ru^II ion is displaced out of the C₂₀N₄ porphyrin least‐squares plane (by 0.2373 Å) toward the bridging ligand of the C_i‐symmetry dimer. The porphyrin ring systems of the dimer thus exhibit mildly domed conformations.     

{2,5‐Bis[3‐(tert‐butyl­aminoxyl)­phenyl]‐1,1‐dimethyl‐3,4‐diphenyl­silole‐κO}bis­(1,1,1,5,5,5‐hexa­fluoro­pentane‐2,4‐dionato)­manganese(II)

In the structure of the first bis‐adduct of 2,5‐bis­[3‐(tert‐butyl­aminoxyl)­phenyl]‐1,1‐dimethyl‐3,4‐diphenyl­silole with bis­(hexa­fluoro­acetyl­acetonato)­manganese(II), [Mn(C₅HF₆O₂)₂(C₃₈H₄₂N₂O₂Si)₂], the Mn atom lies on a crystallographic inversion centre and is bound to two chelating hexafluoro­acetylacetonate ligands and two monodentate nitroxide groups in a distorted octa­hedral configuration. The silole ligands present a propeller‐like arrangement of the benzene rings around the Si‐containing five‐membered ring. The dihedral angles between the complexed nitroxides and the benzene rings to which they are bound are smaller than those found in the free ligand.     

4,4′‐Bis(4‐iodo­phenyl­amino­methyl)­azoxy­benzene: hydrogen‐bonded sheets built from C—H⃛O and C—H⃛π(arene) hydrogen bonds

Borohydride reduction of N‐(4‐nitro­benzyl­idene)‐4‐iodo­aniline has yielded the title compound, 1,2‐bis­[4‐(4‐iodo­phenyl­amino­methyl)­phenyl]­diazene 1‐oxide, C₂₆H₂₂I₂N₄O. The mol­ecules lie across centres of inversion in P2₁/c, with the azoxy O atom disordered over two sites, each having an occupancy of 0.5. The mol­ecules are linked into sheets by a combination of C—H⃛O and C—H⃛π(arene) hydrogen bonds.     

Intermolecular stacking in pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine‐based pentamethylene‐linked flexible ­molecules

The crystal structures of 1‐{5‐[4,6‐bis­(methyl­sulfanyl)‐2H‐py­razolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐2‐yl]­pentyl}‐6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐4‐(pyr­rolidin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, C₂₂H₂₉N₉S₃, and 6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐1‐{5‐[6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐2H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐2‐yl]­pentyl}‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, C₂₅H₃₄N₁₀S₂, which differ in having either a pyrrolidine substituent or a methylsulfanyl group, show intermolecular stacking due to aromatic π–π interactions between the pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine rings.     

Bis(1‐phenyl­ethyl­ammonium) hexa­chloridostannate(IV) and bis­(2‐phenyl­ethyl­ammonium) hexa­chloridostannate(IV)

The crystal structures of the two isomers bis­(1‐phenyl­ethyl­ammonium) hexa­chloridostannate(IV) and bis­(2‐phenyl­ethyl­ammonium) hexa­chloridostannate(IV), both (C₈H₁₂N)₂[SnCl₆], exhibit alternating organic and inorganic layers, which inter­act via N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonding. The inorganic layer contains an extended two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheet. The Sn atom in the 1‐phenylethyl­ammonium salt lies on an inversion centre.     

Self‐assembly of a mixed‐ligand silver‐based coordination polymer

The novel title silver(I) coordination polymer, catena‐poly­[[aceto­nitrile­silver(I)]‐di‐μ‐4‐[N‐(di­phenyl­phosphino)­amino­meth­yl]­pyridine‐κ²N¹:P;κ²P:N¹‐[aceto­nitrile­silver(I)]‐μ₃‐4‐[N,N‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­amino­methyl]­pyridine‐κ³N¹:P:P′‐bis­[aceto­nitrile­silver(I)(Ag—Ag)]‐μ₃‐4‐[N,N‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­amino­methyl]­pyridine‐κ³P:P′:N¹] tetra­kis­(tetra­fluoro­borate) aceto­nitrile trisolvate], {[Ag₄(C₂H₃N)₄(C₁₈H₁₇N₂P)₂(C₃₀H₂₆N₂P₂)₂](BF₄)₄·3C₂H₃N}_n, is formed by the self‐assembly of the Ph₂P(4‐NHCH₂C₅H₄N) and (Ph₂P)₂(4‐NCH₂C₅H₄N) ligands with silver tetra­fluoro­borate. The polymer consists of alternating rings (which lie about inversion centers) bridged by the pyridyl rings of the bis‐phosphine‐substituted ligands, with anions hydrogen bonded the length of the chain. Two distinctly different metal coordination environments exist in the polymer, viz. distorted tetrahedral and trigonal geometries.     

[Bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­alkane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato) complexes of nickel(II)

The structures of a series of four‐coordinate nickel(II) complexes of the form [Ni(sacsac)L] PF₆ (sacsac = pentane‐2,4‐di­thione anion; L = (Ph₂P)₂(CH₂)_n, n = 1,2,3) have beendetermined. These are [bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­methane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato‐S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₅H₂₂P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆, [1,2‐bis­(di­phenylphosphino)­ethane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato–S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₆H₂₄P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆, and [1,3‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­propane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato‐S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₇H₂₆P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆. All have a distorted square‐planar arrangement about Ni with angles around Ni varying with the length of the hydro­carbon chain.     

Azido­[1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene](penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate

In the title compound, azido‐2κN‐bis­[μ‐(1η⁵:2κP)‐di­phenyl­phosphino­cyclo­penta­dienyl][2(η⁵)‐penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­di­enyl]­iron(III)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [{Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)(N₃)}{Fe(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂}]PF₆ or [FeRh(C₁₀H₁₅)(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂(N₃)]PF₆, the coordination sphere of Rh^III can be described as pseudo‐tetrahedral, composed of two P atoms from a 1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene (dppf) ligand, an azido N atom and the centroid of the ring of a C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ligand. The two cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in the dppf moiety adopt an eclipsed conformation. The Rh⋯Fe distance is 4.340 (2) Å.     

2‐Phenyl­malonpiperadide and 2‐phenyl­malonmorpholide

The structures of 2‐phenyl­malonpiperadide [systematic name: 2‐phenyl‐1,3‐bis­(piperidin‐1‐yl)­propane‐1,3‐dione, C₁₉H₂₆N₂O₂, (I)] and 2‐phenyl­malonmorpholide [systematic name: 1,3‐dimorpholino‐2‐phenyl­propane‐1,3‐dione, C₁₇H₂₂N₂O₄, (II)], have been determined and both their molecular conformations and packing arrangements compared. Although chemically similar, compounds (I) and (II) exhibit different molecular conformations. The only general conformational similarities are that their respective carbonyl groups are orientated in the same direction and the heterocyclic rings exist in the chair arrangement. General similarities in the packing arrangements arise due to both compounds having the same space group (P2₁2₁2₁) and a similar alignment of their phenyl‐substituted backbone with respect to the c axis. Similar C—H⋯O hydrogen‐bonding associations are listed for the carbonyl O atoms, while only one of the morpholine O atoms is involved in any such association.     

Hydro­gen‐bonded assemblages in 2,6‐bis­(hydroxy­methyl)‐4‐R‐phenol,with R = methyl,methoxy, phenoxy and 1‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐1‐methyl­ethyl

Four derivatives of 2,6‐bis­(hydroxy­methyl)­phenol, with various para substituents, have been investigated; these are 2,6‐bis­(hydroxy­methyl)‐4‐methyl­phenol, C₉H₁₂O₃, (I), 2,6‐bis­(hydroxy­methyl)‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₉H₁₂O₄, (II), 2,6‐bis­(hydroxy­methyl)‐4‐phenoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₄O₄, (III), and 2,6‐bis­(hydroxy­methyl)‐4‐[1‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐1‐methyl­ethyl]­phenol, C₁₈H₂₂O₄, (IV). All four structures display hydrogen‐bonding networks resulting in sheets, with possible weak inter‐sheet π–π interactions in one case. In all the structures but one, the mol­ecules form centrosymmetric dimeric subunits held together by two hydrogen bonds between the hydroxy­methyl groups and, in two cases, by probable π–π interactions.     

1d‐3,4‐Di‐O‐(di­phenyl­methylphos­pho­nio)‐1,2,5,6‐tetra‐O‐methyl‐chiro‐inositol diiodide

The title compound, 3,4,5,6‐tetra­methoxy­cyclo­hexane‐1,2‐diyl­dioxy­bis­(methyl­di­phenyl­phospho­nium) diiodide, C₃₆­H₄₄­O₆­P₂²⁺·­2I^?, was prepared from a New Zealand natural product, d ‐chiro‐inositol, in order to develop new catalytic metal complexes. The inositol ring retains its usual chair conformation with only minor perturbations caused by the bound di­phenyl­methyl­phosphines. Crystal‐packing forces are provided by C—H?I cation–anion interactions.     

2,4‐Di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazones of 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde, 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone

In 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate {or 4‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)­hydrazono­methyl]­benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate}, C₁₃H₁₀N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (X), 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­am­ide solvate (or 4‐{1‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]ethyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate), C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (XI), and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate (or 4‐­{[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]phenyl­methyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate), C₁₉H₁₄N₄O₆·C₄H₉NO, (XII), the molecules all lack a center of symmetry, crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups and have been observed to exhibit non‐linear optical activity. In each case, the hydrazone skeleton is fairly planar, facilitated by the presence of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds and some partial N—N double‐bond character. Each molecule is hydrogen bonded to one solvent mol­ecule.     

Sulfido‐bridged rhenium–carbonyl complexes with planar and folded Re2S2 cores

The two sulfido‐bridged dirhenium complexes bis(μ‐4‐methoxy­phenyl­sulfido‐S)bis­(tetra­carbonyl­rhenium), [Re₂(C₇H₇­OS)₂­(CO)₈], and bis(μ‐naphthyl­sulfido‐S)bis[tricarbonyl(dicyclohexylphosphane)rhenium], [Re₂­(C₁₂­H₂₃P)₂(C₁₀H₇S)₂­(CO)₆], show different geometries of the common Re₂S₂ core. The 4‐methoxy­phenyl derivative has crystallographic symmetry and the naphthyl derivative has C² symmetry. This results from intramolecular repulsion due to different substitution patterns at the Re and S atoms.     

Supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded hexamers in two 5‐aryl‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyrazolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepines

In both title compounds, i.e. 3‐methyl‐1,5‐di­phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyrazolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepine, C₁₉H₁₈N₄, (I), and 5‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyra­zolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepine, C₁₉H₁₇ClN₄, (II), an N—H?N hydrogen bond links six mol­ecules to form an R(30) ring. Compound (I) crystallizes in the R space group and (II) crystallizes in P with three mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The mol­ecule of (I) contains a disordered seven‐membered ring.     

Dichloro­[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methane]zinc(II) and di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­{chloro­[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methane]cadmium(II)}

The Zn atom in dichloro­[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)­methane]zinc(II), [ZnCl₂(C₁₁H₁₆N₄)], (I), is tetra­hedrally coordinated by two N atoms from one bis­(3,5‐dimethyl­pyrazol­yl)methane ligand and two terminal Cl atoms. The mol­ecule has no crystallographic symmetry. One H atom of the CH₂ group of the bis­(3,5‐dimethyl­pyrazol­yl)methane ligand inter­acts with a Cl atom of an adjacent mol­ecule to yield inter­molecular C—H⋯Cl contacts, thereby forming a one‐dimensional zigzag chain extending along the b axis. On the other hand, in di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­{chloro­[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methane]cadmium(II)}, [Cd₂Cl₄(C₁₁H₁₆N₄)₂], (II), each of the two crystallographically equivalent Cd atoms is penta­coordinated by two N atoms from one bis­(3,5‐dimethyl­pyrazol­yl)methane ligand, and by one terminal and two bridging Cl⁻ anions. The mol­ecule has a crystallographic centre of symmetry located at the mid‐point of the Cd⋯Cd line. One H atom of the CH₂ group of the bis­(3,5‐dimethyl­pyrazolyl)­methane ligand inter­acts with a Cl atom of an adjacent mol­ecule to produce pairwise inter­molecular C—H⋯Cl contacts, thereby affording chains of mol­ecules running along the c axis.     

A new polymorph,form C,of [1,2‐­bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ethane]­dichloronickel(II)

The title compound, [NiCl₂(C₂₆H₂₄P₂)], has arisen as a result of the unexpected reduction (hydrogenation) of the trans‐1,2‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ethene ligand. The hydro­thermal reaction conditions have produced a third polymorphic form of the compound which has twofold symmetry, crystallizes in an enantiomer‐selective manner and contains an unexpectedly short C—C (ethane) bond. Contacts of the form C—H?Cl are present, one involving alkyl and the other aryl hydrogen, with C?Cl distances of 3.556 (4) and 3.664 (6) Å, respectively.     

Two‐dimensional square‐grid frameworks formed by self‐associating copper(II) complexes with 1‐(3‐pyridyl)‐ and 1‐(4‐pyridyl)‐substituted butane‐1,3‐diones

In bis­[1‐(3‐pyridyl)butane‐1,3‐dionato]copper(II) (the Cu atom occupies a centre of inversion), [Cu(C₉H₈NO₂)₂], (I), and bis­[1‐(4‐pyridyl)butane‐1,3‐dionato]copper(II) methanol solvate, [Cu(C₉H₈NO₂)₂]·CH₃OH, (II), the O,O′‐chelating diketonate ligands support square‐planar coordination of the metal ions [Cu—O = 1.948 (1)–1.965 (1) Å]. Weaker Cu⋯N inter­actions [2.405 (2)–2.499 (2) Å], at both axial sides, occur between symmetry‐related bis­(1‐pyridylbutane‐1,3‐dion­ato)copper(II) mol­ecules. This causes their self‐organization into two‐dimensional square‐grid frameworks, with uniform [6.48 Å for (I)] or alternating [4.72 and 6.66 Å for (II)] inter­layer separations. Guest methanol mol­ecules in (II) reside between the distal layers and form weak hydrogen bonds to coordinated O atoms [O⋯O = 3.018 (4) Å].     

(R)‐(+)‐2,2′‐Bis­(di­phenyl­phosphinoyl)‐1,1′‐bi­naphthyl

The title compound, BINAP oxide, C₄₄H₃₂O₂P₂, (I), was synthesized by direct oxidation of (R)‐(+)‐2,2′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)‐1,1′‐bi­naphthyl (BINAP) with tert‐butyl hydro­peroxide in toluene solution. The angle between the naphthyl planes of the bi­naphthyl group is 94.17 (3)°.     

Chiral and meso‐bis([2.2]­para­cyclo­phan‐4‐yl)­methane and meso‐bis­([2.2]­para­cyclo­phan‐4‐yl) sulfide

The [2.2]­para­cyclo­phane groups of the title compounds, chiral and meso‐bis­(tri­cyclo­[8.2.2.2^4,7]­hexa­deca‐4,6,10,12,13,15‐hexa­en‐5‐yl)­methane (the former as a racemate), C₃₃H₃₂, and meso‐bis­(tri­cyclo­[8.2.2.2^4,7]­hexa­deca‐4,6,10,12,13,15‐hexa­en‐5‐yl) sulfide, C₃₂H₃₀S, show the characteristic structural features of the parent compound [2.2]­para­cyclo­phane and the related compound di­methylbis([2.2]­para­cyclo­phan‐4‐yl)­silane, C₃₄­H₃₆­Si: the aromatic rings are puckered, resulting in a boat conformation. The planes of the four coplanar C atoms are slightly twisted with respect to each other. The Csp³—Csp³ bond lengths of the ethyl­ene bridges are elongated by the electronic and steric effects of the skeleton.     

catena‐Poly­[fac‐tri­chloro­methyl­tin(IV)‐μ‐[meso‐1,2‐bis­(phenyl­sulfinyl)­ethane‐O:O′]]

In the title compound, [SnCl₃(CH₃)(C₆H₅SOCH₂)₂]_n, the octahedral Sn^IV centres are bridged by meso‐1,2‐bis­(phenyl­sulfinyl)­ethane ligands forming infinite chains along the [100] direction.