4,5‐Di­hydro‐3‐methyl‐5‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐1H‐pyrazole‐1‐carboxamidinium acetate acetone hemisolvate

The X‐ray structure analysis of the unexpected product of the reaction between 4‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)­but‐3‐en‐2‐one and amino­guanidine revealed the title compound, C₁₂H₁₇N₄⁺·C₂H₃O₂^?·0.5C₃H₆O, consisting of a protonated amidine moiety joined to a substituted pyrazoline ring at the N1 atom. The amidine group is protonated and the positive charge is delocalized over the three C—N bonds in a similar manner to that found in guanidinium salts. The amidinium moiety of the cation is linked to the acetate anions through four N—H?O hydrogen bonds, with N?O distances of 2.749 (4), 2.848 (4), 2.904 (4) and 2.911 (4) Å. The pyrazoline ring adopts a flattened envelope conformation and the substituted phenyl ring is oriented perpendicular to the attached heterocycle. The acetone solvate molecule lies across a twofold rotation axis.     

N‐{(1E)‐Amino­[3‐methyl‐5‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5‐di­hydro‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl]­methyl­ene}‐1H‐imidazole‐1‐carbox­amide

In the title compound, C₁₆H₁₈N₆O, an N‐carbonyl­imidazole derivative of pyrazoline‐1‐carboximid­amide, the π‐electron density of the N atom in the 1‐position on the pyrazoline ring is delocalized through the amidine moiety and the adjacent carbonyl group. The imidazole ring, though coplanar with the rest of the mol­ecule, is deconjugated. The pyrazoline ring adopts a flat‐envelope conformation, having the substituted phenyl ring oriented perpendicular to the mean plane of the heterocycle. Both of the two potential hydrogen‐bond donors are involved in intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

1‐(2,5‐Di­chloro­phenyl)‐3‐methyl‐5‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazole

The title compound, C₁₆H₁₂Cl₂N₂, crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c. Two independent but chemically identical mol­ecules comprise the asymmetric unit and in each of these the pyrazole ring is planar.     

4‐(Di­phenyl­phosphinoyl)‐3‐methyl‐N‐phenyl‐1,2‐isoxazole‐5‐carbox­amide

The title compound, C₂₃H₁₉N₂O₃P, was prepared by the reaction of ethynyldi­phenyl­phosphine oxide with phenyl isocyanate, triethyl­amine and nitoethane in benzene. The molecular structure is stabilized by an intramolecular N—H?O hydrogen bond.     

2‐[(E)‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl)­methyl­ene­amino]‐N‐(X‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1‐benzo­thio­phene‐3‐carbox­amide,where X = 2 and 3

The title compounds, both C₂₃H₂₁ClN₂OS, are isomeric, with (I) and (II) being the N‐3‐methyl­phenyl and N‐2‐methyl­phenyl derivatives, respectively. The dihedral angle between the 4‐chloro­phenyl group and the thio­phene ring in (II) [38.1 (1)°] is larger than that in (I) [7.1 (1)°], indicating steric repulsion between the chloro­phenyl and o‐toluidine groups in (II). In both compounds, an intramolecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bond forms a pseudo‐six‐membered ring, thus locking the molecular conformation. In the crystal structures, mol­ecules are connected via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming chains along the b axis in (I) and along the c axis in (II). Intermolecular C—H⋯O/S and π–π interactions are also observed in (II), but not in (I).     

N,N‐Di­methyl­anilinium 3‐cyano‐4‐(di­cyano­methyl­ene)‐5‐oxo‐4,5‐di­hydro‐1H‐pyrrol‐2‐olate

In the title compound, C₈H₁₂N⁺·C₈HN₄O₂⁻, the anion and cation lie on a crystallographic mirror plane and form planar ribbons via N—H⋯O [N⋯O = 2.933 (4) Å, H⋯O = 2.01 Å and N—H⋯O = 170°] and N—H⋯N [N⋯N = 3.016 (5) Å, H⋯N = 2.15 Å and N—H⋯N = 169°] hydrogen bonds. The ribbons are further linked via weak C—H⋯O and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. In adjacent planes, anions lie opposite cations; π–π interactions (separation a/2 = 3.520 Å) exist between the anions and the cations, and stacks are formed, running along the a axis. The cations are disordered over two interpenetrating sites, with occupancies of 0.833 (5) and 0.167 (5).     

1‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl)‐2‐methyl‐4‐nitro‐5‐(1‐piperidyl)‐1H‐imidazole

The only specific inter­actions that influence the crystal packing of the title compound, C₁₅H₁₇ClN₄O₂, are weak C—H⋯N and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, even though there is a possibility of, for example, π–π stacking or halogen bonding. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the imidazole and benzene rings is 59.82 (5)°. The length of the C—N bond connecting the imidazole and piperidine fragments is correlated with the degree of pyramidalization of the piperidine N atom.     

1‐(2,4,6‐Tri­methyl­phenyl)‐1H‐1,2,3,4‐tetrazole

In the title compound, C₁₀H₁₂N₄, the tetrazole and phenyl rings are planar to within 0.001 (2) and 0.006 (2) Å, respectively. The two rings are not coplanar and have a dihedral angle of 69.07 (9)° between them. Each mol­ecule is connected with two adjacent ones by C—H?N bridges between atoms of tetrazole rings forming chains parallel with the y axis of the unit cell.     

3,5‐Di­methyl‐4‐(2,4,6‐tri­methyl­phenyl­diazenyl)­phenol

In the title compound, C₁₇H₂₀N₂O, (I), the dihedral angle between the two phenyl rings is 15.69 (6)°. An intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding association exists between the hydroxy group and one of the azo N atoms.     

2,2‐Di­methyl‐1‐(2,4,6‐tri­nitro­phenyl)­hydrazine

The title mol­ecule (DMPH‐H), C₈H₉N₅O₆, was investigated to provide comparison with 2,2‐di­phenyl‐1‐picryl­hydrazine, which unlike DMPH‐H is readily oxidizable to form a well known stable free radical (DPPH). The structure shows essential differences in the configuration of the hydrazine‐N atoms, the ortho‐nitro group orientations and the crystal packing. The bond angles of the di­methyl­amino N atom [107.90 (13), 108.96 (12) and 112.21 (13)°] are consistent with a tetrahedral N atom and sp³ hybridization.     

1‐(4‐Bromo­phenyl)‐3‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)­prop‐2‐en‐1‐one

In the mol­ecule of the title compound, C₁₆H₁₃BrO, the two benzene rings are rotated in opposite directions with respect to the central C—C=C—C part of the mol­ecule. The phenone O atom deviates from the least‐squares plane of the mol­ecule by 0.300 (3) Å. In the crystal structure, mol­ecules are paired through C—H⋯π interactions. The molecular pairs along [001] are hydrogen bonded through three translation‐related co‐operative hydrogen bonds in the `bay area', forming molecular chains, which are further hydrogen bonded through C—H⋯Br weak interactions, forming (010) molecular layers. In the third direction, there are only weak van der Waals interactions. The co‐operative hydrogen bonds in the `bay area' are discussed briefly.     

3,5‐Di­amino‐6‐(2‐fluoro­phenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine–di­methyl­form­amide (1/1)

The title compound, C₉H₈FN₅·C₃H₇NO, contains two independent complexes in the asymmetric unit, each consisting of one 3,5‐di­amino‐6‐(2‐fluoro­phenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine mol­ecule and one di­methyl­form­amide solvent mol­ecule. One triazine mol­ecule is disordered over two conformations within the crystal, the occupancies being 62 (1) and 38 (1)%. The phenyl ring of this mol­ecule resolves into two conformations rotated by almost 180° about the bridging bond between the two rings, while the triazine rings approximately superimpose on each other. The triazine mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit differ in the dihedral angles between their respective phenyl and triazine ring planes, these being 57.6 (2)° for the fully occupied, and 76.9 (6) and 106.8 (8)° for the partially occupied mol­ecules. An extensive network of hydrogen bonds maintains the crystal structure.     

2,6‐Di­methyl‐4‐(phenyl­diazenyl)­phenol

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₄N₂O, determined at 293 K, shows that the mol­ecule is approximately planar in the solid state and that the aromatic rings have a trans configuration with respect to the azo double bond, as found for other diazene derivatives. The packing can be described as a polymeric arrangement of mol­ecules linked through O—H⋯N and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and close contacts. These intermolecular interactions result in the formation of infinite chains parallel to the b axis.     

An Efficient Synthesis of New 5‐(1‐Aryl‐1H‐pyrazole‐4‐yl)‐1H‐tetrazoles from 1‐Aryl‐1H‐pyrazole‐4‐carbonitriles via [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction

A series of new 5‐(1‐aryl‐1H‐pyrazole‐4‐yl)‐1H‐tetrazoles 4a‐l were synthesized via [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction from 1‐aryl‐1H‐pyrazole‐4‐carbonitriles 3a‐l , sodium azide and ammonium chloride, using dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvent, in good yields: 64–85%. The structures of these newly synthesized compounds were determined from the IR, ¹H‐ and ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopic data and elemental analyses.     

3‐(4‐Acetyl­phenyl)‐1‐(4‐nitro­phenyl)­triazene

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₃, shows that the stereochemistry about the N=N double bond of the N=N—N(H) moiety is trans. The whole mol­ecule is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0654 Å), the interplanar angle between the phenyl rings being 0.7 (1)° and the largest interplanar angle being that between the phenyl ring and the nitro group of the 4‐nitro­phenyl substituent [11.5 (2)°]. Intermolecular N—H⋯O interactions between mol­ecules related by translation give rise to chains along the [110] and [10] directions, and these chains are held together by N⋯O π–π interactions. An unequal distribution of the double‐bond character among the N atoms suggests a delocalization of π electrons over the diazo­amine group and the adjacent aryl substituents.     

N‐Methyl­pyridinium 3‐cyano‐4‐(di­cyano­methyl­ene)‐5‐oxo‐4,5‐di­hydro‐1H‐pyrrol‐2‐olate

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₆H₈N⁺·C₈HN₄O₂⁻, is characterized by three independent ion pairs (A, B and C) in the asymmetric unit. Each ion pair consists of an anion and a cation, and the three ion pairs have similar geometric parameters. All the anions are arranged as dianion dimers via two N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and the dimers form one‐dimensional columns parallel to the b axis as a result of π–π interactions. The cations are also stacked, in two different ways: one type of stacking consists of alternating A and B cations, while the other type consists of C cations only. Each dianion dimer stack is surrounded by eight stacks of cations and is not connected directly to other dianion stacks.     

Supramolecular structures of 2‐cyano‐3‐di­methyl­amino‐N‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)­acryl­amide and 2‐cyano‐3‐di­methyl­amino‐N‐(2‐methoxy­phenyl)­acryl­amide

In the title compounds, C₁₃H₁₅N₃O, (I), and C₁₃H₁₅N₃O₂, (II), the dihedral angles between the planes of the phenyl ring and the amide group are 4.1 (1) and 20.7 (1)°, respectively. The mol­ecules adopt a fully extended conformation, aided by intramolecular interactions. The molecular structures of (I) and (II) display different crystal packing and hydrogen‐bonding networks.     

5‐Butyl‐4‐(4,4,5,5‐tetra­methyl‐1,3,2‐dioxaborolan‐2‐yl)‐3‐(2,4,6‐tri­methyl­phenyl)­isoxazole

A novel [3+2]‐cyclo­addition reaction of alkynyl­boronates and nitrile oxides gave the title compound, C₂₂H₃₂BNO₃, as a single regioisomer. The X‐ray crystal structure analysis of this compound shows two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, each with approximately coplanar isoxazole and boronate rings.     

Supramolecular structures of 5‐[3‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐ and 5‐[3‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐dioxane‐4,6‐dione

2,2‐Di­methyl‐5‐[3‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐1,3‐di­ox­ane‐4,6‐dione, C₁₆H₁₆O₄, crystallizes in the triclinic space group , with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. These mol­ecules and a centrosymmetrically related pair, linked together by weak C—H?O hydrogen bonds, form a tetramer. 5‐[3‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl)‐2‐propenyl­idene]‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐dioxane‐4,6‐dione, C₁₅H₁₃ClO₄, also crystallizes in the triclinic space group , with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. Centrosymmetrically related mol­ecules are linked together by weak C—H?O hydrogen bonds to form dimers which are further linked by yet another pair of centrosymmetrically related C—H?O hydrogen bonds to form a tube which runs parallel to the a axis.     

Synthesis and Fungicidal Activity of 5‐Aryl‐1‐(aryloxyacetyl)‐3‐(tert‐butyl or phenyl)‐4‐(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)‐4,5‐dihydropyrazole

A series of novel 5‐aryl‐1‐(aryloxyacetyl)‐3‐(tert‐butyl or phenyl)‐4‐(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)‐4,5‐dihydropyrazole 3a – 3n were synthesized by the annulation of 2‐aryloxyacetohydrazides with 3‐aryl‐1‐t‐butyl (or phenyl)‐2‐(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐ones ( 2 ) in the presence of a catalytic amount of acetic acid. Compounds 2 were obtained by the Knoevenagel reactions of 1‐t‐butyl (or phenyl)‐2‐(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)ethanone ( 1 ) with aromatic aldehydes in the presence of piperidine. Their structures were confirmed by IR, ¹H‐NMR, ESI‐MS, and elemental analyses. The preliminary bioassay indicated that some compounds displayed moderate to excellent fungicidal activity. For example, compounds 3l , 3m , and 3n possessed 100% inhibition against Cercospora arachidicola Hori at the concentration of 50 mg/L.