N1‐(4‐tert‐Butyl­phenyl)‐N2‐hydroxy‐α‐oxo‐α‐phenyl­acet­amidine and N2‐hydroxy‐N1‐(4‐nitro­phenyl)‐α‐oxo‐α‐phenyl­acet­amidine hemihydrate

In the title compounds, C₁₈H₂₀N₂O₂, (I), and C₁₄H₁₁N₃O₄·0.5H₂O, (II), respectively, the oxime groups have an E configuration. In (I), the mol­ecules exist as polymers bound by intermolecular C—H⋯O and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds around inversion centres. In (II), intermolecular OW—H⋯N, OW—H⋯O and O—H⋯OW interactions stabilize the molecular packing.     

1‐[(4‐Chloro­benzoyl)­methyl]‐4‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)­pyridinium bromide sesquihydrate and 1‐[(4‐bromo­benzoyl)­methyl]‐4‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)­pyridinium bromide sesquihydrate

The title compounds, C₁₅H₁₆ClN₂O⁺·Br⁻·1.5H₂O and C₁₅H₁₆BrN₂O⁺·Br⁻·1.5H₂O, are isomorphous. The benzene ring is oriented nearly normal to the pyridine ring in both compounds. The molecular packing is mainly influenced by intermolecular O—H⋯O and O—H⋯Br interactions, as well as weak intramolecular C—H⋯O interactions. The H₂OBr⁻ units form an extended water–bromide chain, with a bridging water mol­ecule on a twofold axis.     

3‐Methoxy‐5‐(4‐methyl­phenyl­diazenyl)­salicyl­aldehyde and 3‐methoxy‐5‐(2‐methyl­phenyl­diazenyl)­salicyl­aldehyde

The two title mol­ecules, both C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₃, are roughly planar and display a trans conformation with respect to the –N=N– double bond, as found for other diazene derivatives. In both compounds, there are intramolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and the crystal packing is governed by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking.     

2‐[(E)‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl)­methyl­ene­amino]‐N‐(X‐methyl­phenyl)‐4,5,6,7‐tetra­hydro‐1‐benzo­thio­phene‐3‐carbox­amide,where X = 2 and 3

The title compounds, both C₂₃H₂₁ClN₂OS, are isomeric, with (I) and (II) being the N‐3‐methyl­phenyl and N‐2‐methyl­phenyl derivatives, respectively. The dihedral angle between the 4‐chloro­phenyl group and the thio­phene ring in (II) [38.1 (1)°] is larger than that in (I) [7.1 (1)°], indicating steric repulsion between the chloro­phenyl and o‐toluidine groups in (II). In both compounds, an intramolecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bond forms a pseudo‐six‐membered ring, thus locking the molecular conformation. In the crystal structures, mol­ecules are connected via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming chains along the b axis in (I) and along the c axis in (II). Intermolecular C—H⋯O/S and π–π interactions are also observed in (II), but not in (I).     

4‐(4‐Fluoro‐3‐phenoxy­phen­yl)‐6‐(4‐fluoro­phen­yl)‐2‐oxo‐1,2‐dihydro­pyridine‐3‐carbonitrile and the 6‐(4‐methyl­phen­yl)‐ analogue

The crystal structures of the title compounds, viz. C₂₄H₁₄F₂N₂O₂, (I), and C₂₅H₁₇FN₂O₂, (II), respectively, have been determined in order to unravel the role of an ordered F atom in generating stable supra­molecular assemblies. On changing the substitution from fluorine to a methyl group, C—H⋯F inter­actions are replaced by C—H⋯π inter­actions, revealing the importance of such weak inter­actions when present alongside N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The dihedral angle between the planes of the 4‐fluoro­phenyl ring and the pyridine ring is 26.8 (1)° in (I), while that between the planes of the 4‐methyl­phenyl and pyridine rings is 29.5 (1)° in (II).     

N,N‐Di­methyl­anilinium 3‐cyano‐4‐(di­cyano­methyl­ene)‐5‐oxo‐4,5‐di­hydro‐1H‐pyrrol‐2‐olate

In the title compound, C₈H₁₂N⁺·C₈HN₄O₂⁻, the anion and cation lie on a crystallographic mirror plane and form planar ribbons via N—H⋯O [N⋯O = 2.933 (4) Å, H⋯O = 2.01 Å and N—H⋯O = 170°] and N—H⋯N [N⋯N = 3.016 (5) Å, H⋯N = 2.15 Å and N—H⋯N = 169°] hydrogen bonds. The ribbons are further linked via weak C—H⋯O and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. In adjacent planes, anions lie opposite cations; π–π interactions (separation a/2 = 3.520 Å) exist between the anions and the cations, and stacks are formed, running along the a axis. The cations are disordered over two interpenetrating sites, with occupancies of 0.833 (5) and 0.167 (5).     

Bis­[N,N′‐bis­(di­phenyl­methyl­ene)ethyl­enedi­amine‐κ2N,N′]copper(I) di­chloro­cuprate(I)

The 1:1 adduct of N,N′‐bis­(di­phenyl­methyl­ene)­ethyl­enedi­amine (bz₂en) with copper(I) chloride, viz. [Cu(C₂₈H₂₄N₂)₂][CuCl₂], has been synthesized. The structure contains cationic moieties of Cu^I ions (Cu on a twofold axis) coordinated to four N atoms of two bz₂en mol­ecules (in a distorted tetrahedron) and linear di­chloro­cuprate(I) anions (with Cu on an inversion centre). These cations and anions are packed in columns along b. The packing of the cation and anion columns involves a significant C—H⋯Cl interaction and four short intermolecular C—H⋯π contacts, two of which are between cation columns.     

N‐(3H‐Thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine and N‐methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine

The geometries of the thia­zole ring and the nitr­amino groups in N‐(3H‐thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine, C₃H₃N₃O₂S, (I), and N‐­methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine, C₄H₅N₃O₂S, (II), are very similar. The nitr­amine group in (II) is planar and twisted along the C—N bond with respect to the thia­zole ring. In both structures, the asymmetric unit includes two practically equal mol­ecules. In (I), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers connected to each other by N—H⋯N and much weaker C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In the crystal structure of (II), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers bound to each other by both weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and S⋯O dipolar interactions.     

1‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene

Two chemical isomers of 3‐nitro­benzotrifluoride, namely 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (I), and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (II), have been prepared and their crystal structures determined with the specific purpose of forming a cocrystal of the two. The two compounds display a similar conformation, with dihedral angles between the benzene rings of 83.1 (1) and 76.2 (1)°, respectively, but (I) packs in P while (II) packs in P2₁/c, with C—H⋯O interactions. No cocrystal could be formed, and it is suggested that the C—H⋯O associations in (II) prevent intermolecular mixing and promote phase separation.     

4,4′‐Butane‐1,4‐diylbis[3‐ethyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5(4H)‐one] and 4‐hydr­oxy‐3‐n‐prop­yl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5(4H)‐one

The title compounds, C₁₂H₂₀N₆O₂, (I), and C₅H₉N₃O₂, (II), display the characteristic features of 1,2,4‐triazole derivatives. Compound (I) lies about an inversion centre which is at the mid‐point of the central C—C bond. Compound (II) also contains a planar 1,2,4‐triazole ring but differs from (I) in that it has a hydr­oxy group attached to the ring. Mol­ecules of (I) are held together in the crystal structure by inter­molecular N—H⋯O contacts and by weak π–π stacking inter­actions between the 1,2,4‐triazole moieties. Compound (II) contains inter­molecular O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

Supramolecular structures of three isomeric 4‐(methyl­phenylamino)­pyridine‐3‐sulfonamides

The structures of the three title isomers, namely 4‐(2‐methyl­anilino)pyridine‐3‐sulfonamide, (I), 4‐(3‐methyl­anilino)pyridine‐3‐sulfonamide, (II), and 4‐(4‐methyl­anilino)pyridine‐3‐sulfonamide, (III), all C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₂S, differ in their hydrogen‐bonding arrangements. In all three mol­ecules, the conformation of the 4‐amino­pyridine‐3‐sulfon­amide moiety is conserved by an intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond and a C—H⋯O inter­action. In the supra­mol­ecular structures of all three isomers, similar C(6) chains are formed via inter­molecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds lead to C(4) chains in (I), and to R₂²(8) centrosymmetric dimers in (II) and (III). In each isomer, the overall effect of all hydrogen bonds is to form layer structures.     

Ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)­phenyl]­carbamate,ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐iodo­phenyl]­carbamate and ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐methyl­phenyl]­carbamate

In ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)phenyl]carbamate, C₁₁H₁₃NO₄, all of the non‐H atoms lie on a mirror plane in the space group Pnma; the mol­ecules are linked into simple chains by a single C—H⋯O hydrogen bond. The mol­ecules of ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐iodo­phenyl]carbamate, C₁₁H₁₂INO₄, are linked into sheets by a combination of O—H⋯I and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and a dipolar I⋯O contact. Ethyl N‐­[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐methyl­phenyl]carbamate, C₁₂H₁₅NO₄, crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in the space group P; pairs of mol­ecules are weakly linked by an O—H⋯O hydrogen bond and these aggregates are linked into chains by two independent aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions.     

3,3a‐Dihydrocyclo­penta­[b]­chromen‐1(2H)‐ones from the reaction of salicylaldehyde and 2‐cyclo­penten‐1‐one

The two title chromene compounds, 3,3a‐dihydrocyclo­penta­[b]chromen‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₆H₁₂O₂, (I), and 2‐(2‐hydroxy­benzyl­idene)‐3,3a‐dihydrocyclo­penta­[b]chromen‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₉H₁₄O₃, (II), have been determined in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. Compound (I) is mainly stabilized by C—H⋯π inter­actions. Compound (II) is linked into infinite one‐dimensional chains with a C(3) motif via inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The inter­molecular C—H⋯π and π–­π inter­actions also play key roles in stabilizing the crystal packing. Two intra­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with S(5) motifs were detected in (II).     

Polymorphism in bipodal O,O′‐dimeth­yl N,N′‐(m‐phenyl­ene­di­carbonyl)bis(thio­carbamate)

The title compound, C₁₂H₁₂N₂O₄S₂, crystallizes in white and yellow polymeric forms as a result of inter­esting anti–anti and syn–anti conformational isomerism of the thio­carbon­yl and carbon­yl moieties relative to one another. This work is the first reported X‐ray crystallographic structure determination of isomers of this class of bipodal ligand. The white form, anti–anti, (I), crystallizes with the benzene ring lying about a twofold rotation axis, resulting in both of the thio­carbon­yl and carbon­yl moieties being anti relative to each other. The yellow modification crystallizes as syn–anti, (II), with one thio­carbon­yl moiety syn and the other anti relative to the respective carbon­yl groups. The individual mol­ecules of both (I) and (II) are extensively linked through inter­molecular hydrogen bonds. Inter­molecular hydrogen bonding in (II) includes a network of bifurcated N—H⋯O and N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds, while mol­ecules of (I) include bifurcated C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

N‐(2,4‐Dimethoxy­benzyl­idene­amino)­guanidinium dihydrogenphosphate

In the asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₁₀H₁₅N₄O₂⁺·H₂PO₄⁻, there are two protonated amino­guanidinium cations and two dihydrogenphosphate anions. The positive charge on the protonated amidine group is delocalized over the three C—N bonds in a manner similar to that found in guanidinium salts. The amino­guanidinium cations are found to be the E‐isomer structures. Intra­molecular inter­actions of the N—H⋯N type are observed, leading to the formation of five‐membered rings. Extensive networks of O—H⋯O, N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds stabilize the three‐dimensional network. In the crystal structure, π–π inter­actions between the benzene rings, with a distance of 3.778 (2) Å between the ring centroids, also affect the packing of the mol­ecules.     

Constructor graph description of hydrogen bonding in a supra­molecular assembly of N,N′‐bis­(2‐hydr­oxy‐1‐methyl­ethyl)phthalamide

Hydrogen bonds of four types (N—H⋯O=C, N—H⋯OH, O—H⋯O=C and O—H⋯OH) connect mol­ecules of the title compound, C₁₄H₂₀N₂O₄, in the crystal into sheets folded into a zigzag pattern. The inter­molecular inter­actions are discussed in terms of the first‐ through fourth‐level graph sets, and a constructor graph helps visualize the supra­molecular assembly.     

3,5‐Bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone and 3,5‐bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐oxopiperidinium chloride: potential biophotonic materials

In the title compound 3,5‐bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone, C₂₂H₂₃NO₃, (I), the central heterocyclic ring adopts a flattened boat conformation, while in the related salt 3,5‐bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐oxopiperidin­ium chloride, C₂₂H₂₄NO₃⁺·Cl⁻, (II), the ring exhibits a `sofa' conformation in which the N atom deviates from the planar fragment. The pendant benzene rings are twisted from the heterocyclic ring planes in both mol­ecules in the same direction, the range of dihedral angles between the ring planes being 24.5 (2)–32.7 (2)°. The dominant packing motif in (I) involves centrosymmetric dimers bound by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In (II), cations and anions are linked by strong N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, while weak C—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds link the cations and anions into a three‐dimensional framework.     

4‐(2‐Hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine and the 2‐(2,3‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐, 2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐ and 2‐(2,5‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐substituted derivatives

The 1,5‐benzodiazepine ring system exhibits a puckered boat‐like conformation for all four title compounds [4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₁H₁₈N₂O, (I), 2‐(2,3‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₃H₂₂N₂O₃, (II), 2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₃H₂₂N₂O₃, (III), and 2‐(2,5‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepine, C₂₃H₂₂N₂O₃, (IV)]. The stereochemical correlation of the two C₆ aromatic groups with respect to the benzodiazepine ring system is pseudo‐equatorial–equatorial for compounds (I) (the phenyl group), (II) (the 2,3‐dimethoxyphenyl group) and (III) (the 3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl group), while for (IV) (the 2,5‐dimethoxyphenyl group) the system is pseudo‐axial–equatorial. An intramolecular hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl OH group and a benzodiazepine N atom is present for all four compounds and defines a six‐membered ring, whose geometry is constant across the series. Although the molecular structures are similar, the supramolecular packing is different; compounds (I) and (IV) form chains, while (II) forms dimeric units and (III) displays a layered structure. The packing seems to depend on at least two factors: (i) the nature of the atoms defining the hydrogen bond and (ii) the number of intermolecular interactions of the types O—H...O, N—H...O, N—H...π(arene) or C—H...π(arene).     

Monoclinic and triclinic concomitant polymorphs of di‐μ‐pyridazine‐1κ2N:2κ2N′‐bis­[(saccharinato)silver(I)]

Crystallization of the title compound, di‐μ‐pyridazine‐1κ²N:2κ²N′‐bis­[(2,3‐dihydro‐3‐oxobenzisosulfonazolato‐κN)silver(I)], [Ag₂(C₇H₄NO₃S)₂(C₄H₄N₂)₂], from acetonitrile yields both monoclinic, (I), and triclinic, (II), polymorphs. In both forms, the silver(I) ions have a slightly distorted trigonal AgN₃ coordination geometry and are doubly bridged by two neutral pyridazine (pydz) ligands, generating a centrosymmetric dimeric structure. The saccharinate (sac) ligands are N‐coordinated. The dihedral angles between the sac and pydz rings are 8.43 (7) and 7.94 (8)° in (I) and (II), respectively, suggesting that the dimeric mol­ecule is nearly flat. The bond geometry is similar in both polymorphs. In (I), the dimers inter­act with each other via aromatic π_sac–π_pydz stacking inter­actions, forming two‐dimensional layers, which are further crosslinked by weak C—H⋯O inter­actions. Compound (II) exhibits similar C—H⋯O and π–π inter­actions, but additional C—H⋯π and π⋯Ag inter­actions help to stabilize the packing of the dimers.     

(Z)‐6‐{[1,3‐Dihydroxy‐2‐(hydroxy­methyl)propan‐2‐ylamino]methyl­ene}‐2‐methoxy‐4‐[(E)‐o‐tolyl­diazenyl]­cyclo­hexa‐2,4‐dienone

The title compound, C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, adopts the keto–amine tautomeric form with the hydr­oxy H atom located on the N atom, where it is involved in a strong intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. The compound exhibits trans geometry with respect to the azo N=N double bond, with a dihedral angle between the two benzene rings of 38.03 (6)°. The packing of the mol­ecules in the crystal structure is determined by O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. A comparison with closely related compounds is given.