N‐(3‐Chloro­phenyl)‐α‐phenyl­nitro­ne: association with benzoic acid through hydrogen bonding

The identity of the title complex, C₁₃H₁₀ClNO·C₇H₆O₂, is confirmed to be a hydrogen‐bonded adduct of benzoic acid and N‐(3‐chloro­phenyl)‐α‐phenyl­nitro­ne. The two aromatic rings in the nitro­ne are trans about the C=N bond.     

1:2 Complexes of chloranilic acid with pyrazole and imidazole,and the aceto­nitrile solvate of a 1:1 complex with imidazole

2,5‐Di­chloro‐3,6‐di­hydroxy‐1,4‐benzo­quinone (chloranilic acid) forms X—H?Y (X, Y = N or O) and C—H?Cl hydrogen bonds with pyrazole and imidazole to afford bis­(pyrazolium) di­chloro­anilate and bis­(imidazolium) di­chloro­anilate, (I) and (II), both 2C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₆Cl₂O₄^2?, and imidazolium chloro­anilate aceto­nitrile solvate, C₃H₅N₂⁺·­C₆HCl₂O₄^?·C₂H₃N, (III). Their crystal structures demonstrate three novel supramolecular architectures based on supramolecular synthons to build a ladder, (I), a two‐dimensional network, (II), and a flat ribbon, (III).     

4‐(4‐Chloro­benzyl­ideneamino)‐1,5‐dimethyl‐2‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3(2H)‐one and 4‐(2‐chloro­benzyl­idene­amino)‐1,5‐dimethyl‐2‐phenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐3(2H)‐one

The two title compounds, both with formula C₁₈H₁₆ClN₃O, are structurally similar Schiff bases derived from the condensation of 4‐chloro­benzaldehyde or 2‐chloro­benzaldehyde with 4‐amino­anti­pyrine in methanol solution. As expected, both compounds adopt trans configurations about the central C=N bonds. In the crystal structure of the 4‐chloro analogue, mol­ecules are linked through weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming chains running along the a axis. In the crystal structure of the 2‐chloro analogue, mol­ecules are linked through weak C—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming layers parallel to the ab plane.     

1‐(4‐Chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene

Two chemical isomers of 3‐nitro­benzotrifluoride, namely 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (I), and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl­sulfanyl)‐4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­benzene, C₁₃H₇ClF₃NO₂S, (II), have been prepared and their crystal structures determined with the specific purpose of forming a cocrystal of the two. The two compounds display a similar conformation, with dihedral angles between the benzene rings of 83.1 (1) and 76.2 (1)°, respectively, but (I) packs in P while (II) packs in P2₁/c, with C—H⋯O interactions. No cocrystal could be formed, and it is suggested that the C—H⋯O associations in (II) prevent intermolecular mixing and promote phase separation.     

2‐Chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate and 2,4‐di­chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate: supramole­cular aggregation through C–H⋯O, π–π and van der Waals interactions

In 2‐chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate, C₁₂H₈ClNO₅S, and 2,4‐di­chloro­phenyl 3‐nitro­benzene­sulfonate, C₁₂H₇Cl₂NO₅S, weak C—H⋯O interactions generate S(5), S(6) and (7) rings. The supramolecular aggregation is completed by the presence of π–π interactions and intermolecular van der Waals short contacts.     

Racemic and chiral 1‐[N‐(chloro­acetyl)carbamoylamino]‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐inden‐2‐yl chloroacetate

In the racemic crystals of (1S,2R)‐ or (1R,2S)‐1‐[N‐(chloro­acetyl)­carbamoyl­amino]‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1H‐inden‐2‐yl chloro­acetate, C₁₄H₁₄Cl₂N₂O₄, (I), the enantiomeric mol­ecules form a dimeric structure via the N—H?O cyclic hydrogen bond of the carbamoyl moieties. In the chiral crystals of (—)‐(1S,2R)‐1‐[N‐(chloro­acetyl)­carbamoyl­amino]‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1H‐inden‐2‐yl chloro­acetate, C₁₄H₁₄Cl₂N₂O₄, (II), the N—­H?O intermolecular hydrogen bond forms a zigzag chain around the twofold screw axis. The melting points and calculated densities of (I) and (II) are 446 and 396 K, and 1.481 and 1.445 Mg m^?3, respectively.     

Di­cyclo­hexyl­ammonium 2,4‐di­chloro­phenoxy­acetate and (2,4‐di­chloro­phenoxy­acetato‐O,O′)bis­(tri­phenylphosphine‐P)silver(I)

The monoclinic cell of di­cyclo­hexyl­ammonium 2,4‐di­chloro­phenoxy­acetate contains four C₁₂H₂₄N⁺·C₅H₈Cl₂O₃^? ion pairs. The ammonium N atom is hydrogen bonded to the oxy­gen ends of two carboxyl groups to form a 12‐membered O—C—O?HNH?O—C—O?HNH ring. In (2,4‐di­chloro­phenoxy­lacetato)­bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine)silver(I), [Ag(C₈H₅Cl₂O₃)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], the carboxyl CO₂ unit chelates to the Ag atom in an anisobidentate manner [Ag—O = 2.436 (2) and 2.517 (2) Å]; the Ag atom shows distorted tetrahedral geometry.     

3‐Germyl‐3,3‐di­methyl­propionic acid derivatives

The crystal structures of 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri­chloro­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₅H₉O₂)Cl₃], 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri­phenyl­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₆H₅)₃(C₅H₉O₂)], and 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri‐p‐toly­lgermyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₇H₇)₃(C₅H₉O₂)], have slightly distorted tetrahedral geometries about the Ge atoms. All the structures form dimers via strong O—H·O hydrogen bonds, resulting in eight‐membered rings that can be best described in terms of graph‐set notation (8).     

Hydrogen bonding in 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with 4‐X‐substituted anilines (X = F,Cl or Br)

The crystal structures of three proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid (3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonic acid) with 4‐X‐substituted anilines (X = F, Cl and Br), namely 4‐fluoro­anilinium 5‐sulfosalicylate (3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate) monohydrate, C₆H₇FN⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O, (I), 4‐chloro­anilinium 5‐sulfosalicylate hemihydrate, C₆H₇ClN⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·0.5H₂O, (II), and 4‐bromo­anilinium 5‐sulfosalicylate monohydrate, C₆H₇BrN⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O, (III), have been determined. The asymmetric unit in (II) contains two formula units. All three compounds have three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded polymeric structures in which both the water molecule and the carboxylic acid group are involved in structure extension. With both (II) and (III), which are structurally similar, the common cyclic (8) dimeric carboxylic acid association is present, whereas in (I), an unusual cyclic (8) association involving all three hetero‐species is found.     

A hydrogen‐bonded heterodimer of 1‐(4‐hexyloxyphenyl)pyridin‐4(1H)‐one with 4‐cyano­benzoic acid

The two components of the title heterodimer, C₁₇H₂₁NO₂·C₈H₅NO₂, are linked end‐to‐end via O—H⋯O(=C) and C—H⋯O(=C) hydrogen‐bond inter­actions. Additional lateral C—H⋯O inter­actions link the dimers in a side‐by‐side fashion to produce wide infinite mol­ecular ribbons. Adjacent ribbons are inter­connected viaπ–π stacking and C—H⋯π(arene) inter­actions. This structure represents the first evidence of robust hydrogen‐bond formation between the moieties of pyridin‐4(1H)‐one and benzoic acid.     

A chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine)­ruthenium(II) complex

The aldehyde moiety in the title complex, chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ³N)ruthenium(II)–chloro­(2‐pyridine­carboxyl­ic acid‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine‐κ³N)­ruthenium(II)–perchlorate–chloro­form–water (1.8/0.2/2/1/1), [RuCl­(C₆H₅NO)­(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_1.8[RuCl­(C₆H₅­NO₂)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_0.2­(ClO₄)₂·­CHCl₃·­H₂O, is a structural model of substrate coordination to a transfer hydrogenation catalyst. The title complex features two independent Ru^II complex cations that display very similar distorted octahedral coordination provided by the three N atoms of the 2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine ligand, the N and O atoms of the 2‐pyridine­carbox­aldehyde (pyCHO) ligand and a chloride ligand. One of the cation sites is disordered such that the aldehyde group is replaced by a 20 (1)% contribution from a carboxyl­ic acid group (aldehyde H replaced by carboxyl O—H). Notable dimensions in the non‐disordered complex cation are Ru—N 2.034 (2) Å and Ru—O 2.079 (2) Å to the pyCHO ligand and O—C 1.239 (4) Å for the pyCHO carbonyl group.     

Absolute configuration of (−)‐4‐(3,4‐di­chloro­phenyl)‐4‐(2‐pyridyl)­butanoic acid: essential information to determine crucial steric features of ­arpromidine‐type hist­amine H2 receptor agonists

The structural information gained from the study of the chiral building block (R)‐(?)‐4‐(3,4‐di­chloro­phenyl)‐4‐(2‐pyridyl)­butanoic acid–l ‐(?)‐ephedrine [methyl(1‐hydroxy‐1‐phenyl­prop‐2‐yl)ammon­ium 4‐(3,4‐di­chloro­phenyl)‐4‐(2‐pyrid­yl)but­an­oate], C₁₀H₁₆NO⁺·C₁₅H₁₂Cl₂NO₂^?, can be used to deduce the absolute configuration of highly potent arpromidine‐type hist­amine H₂ receptor agonists, as the chiral butanoic acid can be converted to (R)‐(?)‐3‐(3,4‐di­chloro­phenyl)‐3‐(2‐pyridyl)­propyl­amine and to the corresponding R‐configured arpromidine analogue.     

3′,4′‐Bis(4‐chloro­phenyl)­spiro­[chroman‐3,5′(4′H)‐isoxazol]‐4‐one

The title compound, C₂₃H₁₅Cl₂NO₃, crystallizes with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The chroman­one moiety consists of a benzene ring fused with a six‐membered heterocyclic ring which adopts a sofa conformation. The five‐membered spiro­isoxazoline ring is in an envelope conformation. The p‐chloro­phenyl rings bridged by the five‐membered ring are nearly perpendicular to each other. The chromanone moiety of one mol­ecule packs into the cavity formed by the p‐chloro­phenyl rings of a second mol­ecule through the formation of C—H?π interactions. The structure is stabilized by weak C—H?O, C—H?Cl and C—H?π interactions.     

Polymorphs and pseudo‐polymorphs of μ‐oxo‐bis{[N,N′‐bis(salicylidene)­propane‐1,3‐diamine]oxorhenium(V)}

Two new polymorphs of the title compound, μ‐oxo‐bis{oxo{2,2′‐[propane‐1,3‐diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphen­olato}rhenium(V)}, [Re₂O(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₃)₂], are reported, containing either a conformation other than the one already known in the literature or a disorder involving both the new and the previously reported conformations. Four pseudo‐polymorphs of the title compound are also reported, containing four chloro­form, two chloro­form, two disordered di­chloro­methane or two water solvate mol­ecules accompany­ing each Re complex molecule. Only in the hydrate does the Re complex adopt the old conformation. In all six structures, the complex molecule is located on a crystallographic inversion centre. Independent of the conformation, all ReV ions display the same, somewhat distorted, octahedral coordination. In all the solvates, hydrogen bonds are donated from the solvent to the O atoms bonded to Re, either of the C—H?O or O—H?O type, although the actual position of the solvent mol­ecule can vary. Only in the hydrate is a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network found; isolated clusters are formed in all the other solvates.     

The gold(III) tetra­chloride salt of L‐cocaine

The title salt, methyl (1R,2R,3S,5S,8S)‐3‐benzoyl­oxy‐8‐methyl‐8‐aza­bicyclo­[3.2.1]octane‐2‐carboxyl­ate tetra­chloro­aurate(III), (C₁₇H₂₂NO₄)[AuCl₄], has its protonated N atom intra­molecularly hydrogen bonded to the O atom of the methoxy­carbonyl group [N⋯O = 2.755 (6) Å and N—H⋯O = 136°]. Two close inter­molecular C—H⋯O contacts exist, as well as five C—H⋯Cl close contacts. The [AuCl₄]⁻ anion was found to be distorted square planar.     

Diels–Alder adducts of maleic ­anhydride and dienes: new compounds by crystallization

We have determined the crystal structures of bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic anhydride, C₉H₈O₃, (I), 1,2,3,4,7,7‐hexa­chloro­bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic anhydride diethyl ether solvate, C₉H₂Cl₆O₃·0.16­C₄H₁₀O, (II), bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic acid, C₉H₁₀O₄, (III), 1,2,3,4,7,7‐hexa­chloro­bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic acid, C₉H₄Cl₆O₄, (IVa) and (IVb), and ethyl 1,2,3,4,7,7‐hexa­chloro‐6‐carboxybi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5‐carboxyl­ate monohydrate, C₁₁H₈Cl₆O₄·H₂O, (V). Compounds (I) and (II) were prepared by a standard Diels–Alder reaction from maleic anhydride and cyclo­penta­diene or hexa­chloro­cyclo­penta­diene, respectively. The crystal‐growing processes of these compounds led to surprising results: rapid recrystallization of (I) from diethyl ether and (II) from petroleum ether gave crystals of these compounds, however, crystallization by slow evaporation techniques using common solvents yielded new compounds in which the five‐membered heterocycle has been cleaved.     

catena‐Poly[[diaquabis(2‐chloronicotinato‐κ2O,O′)cadmium(II)]‐μ‐2‐chloronicotinato‐κ3O,O′:N]

In the title neutral coordination polymer, [Cd(C₆H₃ClNO₂)₂(H₂O)₂]_n, each Cd^II ion is coordinated by one N and four O atoms from three 2‐chloro­nicotinate ligands and by two aqua ligands, defining a distorted monocapped octahedral coordination geometry. Adjacent Cd atoms are linked by the pyridyl N atom and the bidentate carboxyl­ate functional group of a 2‐­chloro­nicotinate ligand, forming a one‐dimensional infinite chain along the b axis. The Cd⋯Cd distance is 8.112 (3) Å. These chains are linked by O—H⋯O and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network structure.     

(12,17‐Diethoxy­carbonyl‐2,3,6,­7,11,­18‐hexa­methyl­corrphy­cenato‐­κ4N)iodoiron(III) chloro­form solvate

The title complex, (diethyl 3,4,8,15,19,20‐hexa­methyl‐21,22,23,24‐tetraazopenta­cyclo­[16.2.1.1^2,5.1^7,11.1^14,17]­tetracosa‐1(20),2(22),3,5,7,9,11,13(24),14,16,18‐undecaene‐9,14‐dicarb­oxyl­ate‐κ⁴N)­iodo­iron(III) chloro­form solvate, [Fe(C₃₂H₃₂­N₄O₄)I]·­CHCl₃, shows an almost planar arrangement of the corrphycene moiety with a slightly distorted trapezoid pyramidal core; the Fe^III atom is 0.416 (1) Å from the plane of the C₂₀N₄ system. The Fe—N distances are 2.049 (3), 2.044 (3), 2.079 (3) and 2.075 (3) Å. The solvated chloro­form forms a C—H?O hydrogen bond [C?O 3.107 (10) Å] to an adjacent carbonyl O atom. This is the first X‐ray structure analysis of a corrphycenatoiron(III) derivative.     

Two new polymorphs of 4‐(N,N‐dimethyl­amino)­benzoic acid

Two new polymorphs of 4‐(N,N‐dimethyl­amino)­benzoic acid, C₉H₁₁NO₂, resulting from the attempted cocrystallization in ethanol of 4‐(N,N‐dimethyl­amino)­benzoic acid and a mixture of 3‐(N,N‐dimethyl­amino)­benzoic acid and 3‐(3‐pyrid­yl)‐2‐pyridone producing one polymorph, and a mixture of 3‐(N,N‐dimethyl­amino)­benzoic acid and 5‐meth­oxy‐3,3′‐bipyridine producing the second polymorph, have been crystallographically characterized. The primary inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds generate a dimeric acid–acid motif that is present in all three polymorphs.     

Cyano–cyano and chloro–cyano interactions in two imidazole derivatives

In two closely related 1‐aryl‐2‐methyl‐4‐nitro‐5‐cyano­imid­azoles, namely 2‐methyl‐4‐nitro‐1‐phenyl‐1H‐imidazole‐5‐carbo­nitrile, C₁₁H₈N₄O₂, and 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐2‐methyl‐4‐nitro‐1H‐imidazole‐5‐carbo­nitrile, C₁₁H₇ClN₄O₂, different weak intermolecular interactions determine the crystal packing. In the 1‐phenyl derivative, dipole–dipole interactions between antiparallel cyano groups connect mol­ecules into centrosymmetric dimers, while in the 1‐(4‐chloro­phenyl) derivative, the dimers are connected by C≡N⋯Cl—C halogen bonds. These interactions, together with weak C—H⋯O(N) hydrogen bonds, connect mol­ecules related by subsequent centres of inversion into infinite tapes.