Two 2,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazo­le–metal complexes (M = Cu and Ni)

The reaction of the diazine ligand 3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazole (pod, C₁₂H₈N₄O), with Cu(CF₃SO₃)₂ or Ni(ClO₄)₂ afforded the title complexes di­aqua­bis­[3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazole‐N²,N³]copper(II) bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sul­fon­ate), [Cu(pod)₂(H₂O)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂, and di­aqua­bis­[3,5‐bis(2‐pyridinyl)‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazo­le‐N²,N³]­nickel(II) diperchlorate, [Ni(pod)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂. Both complexes present a crystallographically centrosymmetric mononuclear cation structure which consists of a six‐coordinated Cu^II or Ni^II ion with two pod mol­ecules acting as bidentate ligands and two axially coordinated water mol­ecules.     

(E)‐1‐(2‐Hydro­xy‐4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐2‐(3,4,5‐tri­methoxy­phenyl)­ethene

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₈H₂₀O₅, all geometric parameters fall within experimental error of the expected values. Analysis of the molecular‐packing plots reveals an infinite one‐dimensional linear array running parallel to the c axis, formed by an O—H⃛O intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interaction. The stilbene framework and most of the substituents are approximately coplanar.     

Two crystal forms of mesogenic bis(4′‐cyanobiphenyl‐4‐yl) butanedioate

The title compound, C₃₀H₂₀N₂O₄, exhibits a nematic phase in the wide temperature range between 498.5 and 538.6 K, in spite of the short linker moiety. Two crystal forms have been found. In both forms, the molecule is centrosymmetric. Form I has a planar biphenyl group, while form II has a twisted biphenyl group with a twist angle of 34.75 (6)°. The packing modes are also different. In form I the long molecular axes are tilted with respect to each other at about 30°, while in form II the long molecular axes have an almost parallel arrangement.     

A synchrotron diffraction study of two polymorphic forms of 2,5‐bis[2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)ethenyl]pyrazine

Two polymorphs, α and γ, of the title compound, C₂₂H₂₀N₂O₂, have been characterized by means of single‐crystal synchrotron X‐ray diffraction. In the α form, the mol­ecules pack in a herring‐bone fashion, linked via weak C—H?N intermolecular interactions (H?N 2.58 Å). In the γ form, the mol­ecules are arranged in nearly planar sheets, which form a network held together by intermolecular hydrogen bonds of the type C—H?O (H?O 2.49 Å) and C—H?N (H?N 2.50 Å). The stacking distance between the sheets is 3.40 Å.     

Red,orange and yellow crystals of 4,5‐­bis(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐2‐(3‐nitro­phenyl)‐1H‐imidazole

Red non‐solvate crystals of the title compound from ethanol, C₂₃H₁₉N₃O₄, orange solvate crystals from tert‐butanol, C₂₃H₁₉N₃O₄·C₄H₁₀O, yellow solvate crystals from dioxane–water, C₂₃H₁₉N₃O₄·0.5C₄H₈O₂, and intense yellow solvate crystals from benzene–N,N′‐dimethylformamide, C₂₃H₁₉N₃O₄·C₆H₆, differ from each other in their molecular conformation and hydrogen‐bonding scheme. The bathochromic shifts of the crystal color are explained by the molecular planarity and charge‐transfer effect among the imidazole mol­ecules.     

Luminescent copoly(aryl ether)s with new electron‐transporting bis(3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole or bis(3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)‐4‐(4‐hexyloxyphenyl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazole segments

To investigate the effect of trifluoromethyl groups in enhancing electron affinity of aromatic oxadiazole and triazole chromophores, we prepared four new copoly(aryl ether)s ( P1 – P4 ) consisting of bis(3‐(trifluoromethyl) phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole (ETO) or bis(3‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)‐4‐(4‐hexyloxyphenyl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazole (ETT) segments and hole‐transporting segments [2,5‐distyrylbenzene (HTB) or bis(styryl)fluorine (HTF)]. Molecular spectra (absorption and photoluminescence) and cyclic voltammetry were used to investigate their optical and electrochemical properties. The emissions of P1 – P4 are dominated by the hole‐transporting fluorophores with longer emissive wavelengths around 442–453 nm via efficient excitation energy transfer. The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy levels of P1 – P4 , estimated from electrochemical data, are ?5.15, ?5.18, ?5.30, ?5.27, ?3.39, ?3.49, ?3.36, and ?3.48 eV, respectively. The LUMO levels of ETO and ETT segments are significantly reduced to ?3.39～?3.36 eV and ?3.48～?3.49 eV, respectively, as compared with ?2.45 eV of P5 containing a 2,5‐diphenyl‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole segment. Moreover, electron and hole affinity can be enhanced simultaneously by introducing isolated hole‐ and electron‐transporting segments in the backbone. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 5900–5910, 2004     

N‐(4‐Cyano­phenyl)‐α‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­nitro­ne

In the crystal structure of the title compound, 4‐cyano‐N‐(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)­phenyl­amine N‐oxide, C₁₅H₁₂N₂O₂, the 4‐methoxy­phenyl is approximately coplanar with the nitrone moiety but significantly rotated with respect to the 4‐cyano­phenyl moiety. The extent of this rotation is significantly different for the two crystallographically independent mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit [dihedral angles of 19.4 (1) and 26.5 (1)°]. The geometry about the C=N bond is Z. The two mol­ecules are related to one another by a pseudo inversion centre.     

Polyimides based on 2,5‐bis(4‐aminophenoxy)biphenyl

A diamine monomer II , 2,5‐bis(4‐aminophenoxy)biphenyl, was prepared through a nucleophilic substitution reaction of phenylhydroquinone and p‐chloronitrobenzene in the presence of potassium carbonate in N,N‐dimethylformamide, followed by catalytic reduction with hydrazine and Pd/C. A series of all‐aromatic, organosoluble polyimides bearing pendent phenyl groups were synthesized from the diamine with six kinds of commercial dianhydrides via a conventional two‐stage process. For improving solubility of polypyromellitimide, copolypyromellitimides with arbitrary solubilities were prepared from II and a pair of dianhydrides, which were mixed at certain molar ratios. These polymers showed good solubilities in N‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone and m‐cresol. The softening temperatures of these polyimides were recorded between 206 and 269 °C. Polymers had glass‐transition temperatures at 230–286 °C and 10% weight‐loss temperatures above 521 °C in air or nitrogen atmospheres. Their films had high tensile moduli and strengths. Excellent properties of these polyimides are attributed to the incorporation of the pendent phenyl group in diamine II . © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 429–438, 2002; DOI 10.1002/pola.10116     

Polymerization behavior of 2,5‐bis(dicyanomethylene)‐ 2,5‐dihydrofuran

2,5‐Bis(dicyanomethylene)‐2,5‐dihydrofuran (TCNF) is not homopolymerizable with any initiators, but copolymerizable with styrene (St) in an alternating fashion. Reactivity of TCNF was compared with that of 2,5‐bis(dicyanomethylene)‐2,5‐dihydrothiophene (TCNT) on the basis of the terpolymerization of the TCNT‐TCNF‐St system and the rates of addition reactions of AIBN with TCNT and with TCNF. TCNF was found to be lower in reactivity than TCNT. The relative reactivity was explained with the energy difference between quinonoid structure and benzenoid one. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 1285–1292, 1999     

Hexakis­(imidazole‐N3)­nickel(II) bis(4‐methoxy­benzoate)

In the title complex of [Ni(C₃H₄N₂)₆](C₈H₇O₃)₂, the Ni atom is in an octahedral environment formed by the tertiary N atom of the imidazole moieties. The methoxy­benzoate moieties act as a bridge connecting two hexakis­(imidazole)nickel(II) mol­ecules through N—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Bis(2,5‐dimethoxy‐4‐methylphenyl)methane and bis(2,5‐dimethoxy‐3,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)methane

Bis(2,5‐di­methoxy‐4‐methyl­phenyl)­methane, C₁₉H₂₄O₄, (IIa), was obtained and characterized as a minor product from the reaction of tolu­hydro­quinone di­methyl ether (1,4‐dimethoxy‐2‐methylbenzene) with N‐(hydroxy­methyl)­tri­fluoro­acet­amide. Similarly, bis(2,5‐di­methoxy‐3,4,6‐tri­methyl­phenyl)­methane, C₂₃H₃₂O₄, (IIb), was prepared from the corresponding reaction of tri­methyl­hydro­quinone di­methyl ether (2,5‐dimethoxy‐1,3,4‐trimethylbenzene). The mol­ecules of (IIa) and (IIb) each lie on a twofold axis passing through the methyl­ene group. The dihedral angle between the planar phenyl rings is 73.4 (1)° in (IIa) and 77.9 (1)° in (IIb). The external bond angles around the bridging methyl­ene group are 116.6 (2) and 117.3 (2)° for (IIa) and (IIb), respectively. In (IIa), the methoxy substituents lie in the plane of the ring and are conjugated with the aromatic system, whereas in (IIb), they are almost perpendicular to the phenyl ring and are positioned on opposite sides.     

1‐(2‐Hydro­xy‐4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐3‐(2,3,4‐tri­methoxy­phenyl)­prop‐2‐en‐1‐one

The title compound, C₁₉H₂₀O₆, crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The mol­ecule is approximately planar and the dihedral angle between the phenyl rings is 11.0 (1)°. The H atoms of the central propenone group are trans. There is an intramolecular O—H⃛O hydrogen bond and the mol­ecules are crosslinked by four intermolecular C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, producing a three‐dimensional network.     

Di­methyl 2‐{[2‐(methoxy­carbonyl)‐1‐(methoxy­carbonyl­methyl)pyrrol‐4‐yl]­methyl­ene}propane­dioate

The title compound, C₁₅H₁₇NO₈, is a pyrrole–ethene derivative with potential biological activity. Although a large part of the mol­ecule is planar, there is no structural evidence for any conjugation push–pull effect across the ethyl­enic bond, which is usually observed for substituted ethyl­enes; π‐electron delocalization appears to be restricted to the 2‐(methoxy­carbonyl)­pyrrole moiety.     

Two concomitant polymorphs of N,N′‐bis[4‐(diethylamino)phenyl]terephthaldiamide

The title compound, C₂₈H₃₄N₄O₂, crystallizes simultaneously as a monoclinic, (Im), and a (twinned) triclinic polymorph, (It), from d₆‐dimethyl sulfoxide. Polymorph (It) (P, Z = 1) displays the standard `ladder' packing for this group of compounds, with neighbouring inversion‐symmetric molecules related by translation and connected by hydrogen bonds of the form N—H...O=C. Polymorph (Im) (Cc, Z = 4) has no imposed symmetry; there are three independent hydrogen bonds, one classical N—H...O=C and a bifurcated system with N—H...O=C augmented by a short C—H...O=C interaction. Each molecule is thereby linked to four neighbouring molecules, two lower and two higher, so that a crosslinked three‐dimensional pattern is formed rather than the standard ladder.     

Two polymorphic forms of N‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐5‐[(4‐chlorophenyl)aminomethyl]‐6‐methyl‐2‐phenyl­pyrimidin‐4‐amine

Two polymorphic forms of the title compound, C₂₄H₂₀Cl₂N₄, were obtained and characterized using X‐ray crystal structure analysis. Colourless crystals of polymorph (Ia) were obtained from the oily mother residue. Recrystallization of polymorph (Ia) from an acetone–methanol mixture resulted in pale‐yellow crystals of polymorph (Ib). The major feature distinguishing the two polymorphic forms is their inter­action modes, and hence their packing arrangements. In the crystal structure of polymorph (Ia), there are N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and also aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions between mol­ecules. The mol­ecules of polymorph (Ib) are linked by N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds only.     

Di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­{bis­[2,5‐bis­(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole‐κ2C2′,N]iridium(III)] dichloro­methane disolvate

In the title compound, [Ir₂(C₁₆H₁₃N₂O₃)₄Cl₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, the two Ir atoms, 3.7075 (6) Å apart, are bridged by two Cl atoms which straddle a twofold axis of rotation through the two Ir atoms. Each Ir centre resides in a distorted octa­hedral environment completed by two chelating 2,5‐bis­(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole ligands, with trans‐N—N and cis‐C—C dispositions. In the stacking structure, there are two types of hydrogen bonds, involving the meth­oxy substitutent, an N atom of the oxadiazole ring and the dichloro­methane solvent mol­ecules.     

3,5‐Bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone and 3,5‐bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐oxopiperidinium chloride: potential biophotonic materials

In the title compound 3,5‐bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone, C₂₂H₂₃NO₃, (I), the central heterocyclic ring adopts a flattened boat conformation, while in the related salt 3,5‐bis(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)‐1‐methyl‐4‐oxopiperidin­ium chloride, C₂₂H₂₄NO₃⁺·Cl⁻, (II), the ring exhibits a `sofa' conformation in which the N atom deviates from the planar fragment. The pendant benzene rings are twisted from the heterocyclic ring planes in both mol­ecules in the same direction, the range of dihedral angles between the ring planes being 24.5 (2)–32.7 (2)°. The dominant packing motif in (I) involves centrosymmetric dimers bound by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In (II), cations and anions are linked by strong N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, while weak C—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds link the cations and anions into a three‐dimensional framework.     

2,5‐Bis(2‐(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole ligands and their Cu(I) complexes for Sonogashira coupling reaction

Two diphosphane ligands – 2,5‐bis(2‐(diphenylphosphino)‐5‐R)phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole ( L1 , R = H, L2 , R = OMe) and their binuclear complexes, L1Cu and L2Cu , were prepared and characterized. The molecular structures of L1Cu and L2Cu , as perchlorate salts, were established by X‐ray crystallography, which showed them to be binuclear complexes with each Cu atom tetrahedrally coordinated by two P atoms and two N atoms. The ligands and their Cu(I) complexes catalyzed Sonogashira coupling reactions of iodobenzene with phenylacetylene in the presence of K₂CO₃ under Pd‐free conditions. Coupling reactions catalyzed by L1 or L2 with Cu(MeCN)₄ClO₄ in situ exhibited better yields than those by the corresponding Cu(I) complexes L1Cu or L2Cu . Detailed studies showed L1 or L2 with Cu(MeCN)₄ClO₄ to be suitable catalysts for the coupling reaction of terminal alkynes and aryl halides. The coupling reactions of aryl iodides with electron‐withdrawing groups showed better results. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

2,4‐Di­methoxy­benzoic acid and 2,5‐di­methoxy­benzoic acid

The title compounds (both C₉H₁₀O₄) have nearly planar structures, and the methyl and/or carboxylic acid groups lie out of the molecular plane, as dictated by steric interactions. 2,5‐Di­methoxy­benzoic acid (2,5‐DMBA) forms an unusual intramolecular hydrogen bond between the carboxylic acid group and the O atom of the methoxy group in the 2‐position [O⋯O = 2.547 (2) Å and O—H⋯O = 154 (3)°]. 2,4‐DMBA forms a typical hydrogen‐bond dimer with a neighboring mol­ecule.     

4,7‐Bis(4‐pyridyl­ethynyl)‐2,1,3‐benzo­thia­diazo­le and its dipyridinium diperchlorate

The title compound, C₂₀H₁₀N₄S, and its dipyridinium salt, 4,4′‐(2,1,3‐benzo­diazol‐4,7‐diyl­diethynyl)­dipyridinium diperchlorate, C₂₀H₁₂N₄S²⁺·2ClO₄^?, display bond alternation in the 2,1,3‐benzo­thia­diazo­le rings, which suggests their quinonoid character. The dipyridinium dication mol­ecules stack along the a axis and form a dimer with short S?N interheteroatom contacts [3.146 (4) Å] between the two 1,2,5‐thia­diazo­le rings. The dimer is surrounded by the perchlorate anions with which it forms a large number of intermolecular N—H?O and C—H?O hydrogen bonds.