4‐[(3‐Chloro­phenyl)­diazenyl]‐2‐{[tris(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]amino­methyl­ene}cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one

The title compound, C₁₇H₁₈ClN₃O₄, adopts the keto–amine tautomeric form and displays an intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond [N⋯O = 2.639 (2) Å]. The configuration around the azo N=N double bond is trans, and the dihedral angle between the planes of the two aromatic rings is 20.5 (2)°. The mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional network.     

2‐(4‐Methoxyphenyl­azo)‐4‐phenyl­phenol

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₉H₁₆N₂O₂, displays a trans configuration of the azo moiety, which forms an intramolecular O—H?N=N hydrogen bond. The H?N and O?N distances are 1.81 (3) and 2.581 (4) Å, respectively. The azo­benzene moiety is approximately planar, and has a dihedral angle of ca 23° with the substituted phenyl group.     

5‐(2‐Chloro­phenyl­diazenyl)­salicyl­aldehyde and 4‐(2‐chloro­phenyl­diazenyl)‐2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one

The mol­ecule of the former title compound, C₁₃H₉ClN₂O₂, (I), is nearly planar, with an intramolecular O⋯O hydrogen bond of 2.692 (2) Å. The latter title compound, C₁₇H₁₈ClN₃O₄, (II), exists in the keto–amine tautomeric form, with a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond of 2.640 (2) Å between the O and N atoms, the H atom being bonded to the N atom. The azo­benzene moieties of both mol­ecules have trans configurations, and the dihedral angle between the planes of the two aromatic rings is 4.1 (1)° in (I) and 9.9 (1)° in (II). The N—H⋯O hydrogen‐bonded rings are almost planar and coupled with the cyclo­hexa­diene rings in (II).     

Acetone‐4‐methyl­thio­semicarbazone at 220 K

In the title compound, C₅H₁₁N₃S, the trans conformation is stabilized by a weak intramolecular N—H?N hydrogen bond. Unusually, one N—H bond is not involved in any hydrogen‐bond interactions and instead the mol­ecules form a one‐dimensional polymer via N—H?S intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

3‐Methoxy‐5‐(4‐methyl­phenyl­diazenyl)­salicyl­aldehyde and 3‐methoxy‐5‐(2‐methyl­phenyl­diazenyl)­salicyl­aldehyde

The two title mol­ecules, both C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₃, are roughly planar and display a trans conformation with respect to the –N=N– double bond, as found for other diazene derivatives. In both compounds, there are intramolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and the crystal packing is governed by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking.     

6,6′‐Di­methoxy‐2,2′‐[(1R,2R)‐cyclo­hexane‐1,2‐diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenol: three C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds generate a three‐dimensional framework

Molecules of the title compound, alternatively called (R,R)‐N,N′‐bis(3‐methoxysalicylidene)‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐diamine, C₂₂H₂₆N₂O₄, contain two intramolecular O—H⃛N hydrogen bonds and adopt a conformation with approximate twofold rotational symmetry. The mol­ecules are linked by three C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds [H⃛O = 2.45–2.55 Å, C⃛O = 3.329 (2)–3.398 (2) Å and C—H⃛O = 142–172°] into a continuous framework.     

N,N′‐Diethyl‐4‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐diamine, 2,6‐bis(ethylamino)‐3‐nitrobenzonitrile and bis(4‐ethylamino‐3‐nitrophenyl) sulfone

N,N′‐Diethyl‐4‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐diamine, C₁₀H₁₅N₃O₂, (I), crystallizes with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, both of which are nearly planar. The molecules differ in the conformation of the ethylamine group trans to the nitro group. Both molecules contain intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the adjacent amine and nitro groups and are linked into one‐dimensional chains by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The chains are organized in layers parallel to (101) with separations of ca 3.4 Å between adjacent sheets. The packing is quite different from what was observed in isomeric 1,3‐bis(ethylamino)‐2‐nitrobenzene. 2,6‐Bis(ethylamino)‐3‐nitrobenzonitrile, C₁₁H₁₄N₄O₂, (II), differs from (I) only in the presence of the nitrile functionality between the two ethylamine groups. Compound (II) crystallizes with one unique molecule in the asymmetric unit. In contrast with (I), one of the ethylamine groups, which is disordered over two sites with occupancies of 0.75 and 0.25, is positioned so that the methyl group is directed out of the plane of the ring by approximately 85°. This ethylamine group forms an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond with the adjacent nitro group. The packing in (II) is very different from that in (I). Molecules of (II) are linked by both intermolecular amine–nitro N—H...O and amine–nitrile N—H...N hydrogen bonds into a two‐dimensional network in the (10) plane. Alternating molecules are approximately orthogonal to one another, indicating that π–π interactions are not a significant factor in the packing. Bis(4‐ethylamino‐3‐nitrophenyl) sulfone, C₁₆H₁₈N₄O₆S, (III), contains the same ortho nitro/ethylamine pairing as in (I), with the position para to the nitro group occupied by the sulfone instead of a second ethylamine group. Each 4‐ethylamino‐3‐nitrobenzene moiety is nearly planar and contains the typical intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond. Due to the tetrahedral geometry about the S atom, the molecules of (III) adopt an overall V shape. There are no intermolecular amine–nitro hydrogen bonds. Rather, each amine H atom has a long (H...O ca 2.8 Å) interaction with one of the sulfone O atoms. Molecules of (III) are thus linked by amine–sulfone N—H...O hydrogen bonds into zigzag double chains running along [001]. Taken together, these structures demonstrate that small changes in the functionalization of ethylamine–nitroarenes cause significant differences in the intermolecular interactions and packing.     

Dichloro­oxo(quinoline‐8‐thiolato‐κ2N,S)(triphenyl­phosphine oxide‐κO)rhenium(V) acetone solvate

The complex mol­ecule in the title compound, [Re(C₉H₆NS)Cl₂O(C₁₈H₁₅OP)]·C₃H₆O, has distorted octa­hedral geometry. The Re=O bond occupies the position trans to the triphenyl­phosphine oxide O atom. The Re—Cl bond trans to the thiol­ate S atom is longer than that trans to the quinoline N atom, implying a stronger trans influence of the S atom. Intra‐ and inter­molecular π–π inter­actions are also observed between the π rings in the complex.     

Racemic isopropyl 1,4‐dihydro‐2,6‐dimethyl‐4‐(6‐methyl‐2‐pyridyl)‐3‐nitropyridine‐5‐carboxylate hemi­benzene solvate

This analysis establishes the rotameric orientation of the pyridyl‐ring N atom of the title compound, C₁₇H₂₁N₃O₄·0.5C₆H₆, as antiperiplanar (ap) to the 1,4‐dihydropyridine H‐4, the absence of an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the 1,4‐dihydropyridine NH and the pyridyl‐N atom, and the unusual planarity of the 1,4‐dihydropyridine ring.     

Intramolecular interactions in μ‐oxido‐bis{bis[2‐(dimethylaminomethyl)phenyl]stannol}

The title compound, [Sn₂(C₉H₁₂N)₄O(OH)₂], consists of two [2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]₂SnOH units bridged by an O atom located on a twofold rotation axis. The unique Sn atom is six‐coordinated with a (C,N)₂SnO₂ octahedral core, as a result of the strong intramolecular N→Sn dative coordination trans to the Sn—O bonds [N—Sn—O = 170.24 (12) and 167.83 (10)°]. Owing to the presence of intermolecular H...phenyl contacts, the molecules are arranged in a ladder‐like structure.     

Hydro­gen‐bonded adducts of ferrocene‐1,1′‐diyl­bis­(di­phenyl­methanol): monomeric and polymeric adducts with 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethene and 1,6‐di­amino­hexane

In the adduct ferrocene‐1,1′‐diyl­bis­(di­phenyl­methanol)–1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethene (1/1), [Fe(C₁₈H₁₅O)₂]·C₁₂H₁₀N₂, there is an intramolecular O—H?O hydrogen bond in the ferro­cene­diol component and a single O—H?N hydrogen bond linking the diol to the di­amine, which is disordered over two sets of sites, so forming a finite monomeric adduct. In the adduct ferrocene‐1,1′‐diyl­bis­(di­phenyl­methanol)–1,6‐di­amino­hexane (2/1), 2[Fe(C₁₈H₁₅O)₂]·C₆H₁₆N₂, the amine lies across a centre of inversion in space group P. There is an intramolecular O—H?O hydrogen bond in the ferrocenediol, and the molecular components are linked by O—H?N and N—H?O hydrogen bonds, one of each type, into a C(13)[R(12)] chain of rings.     

1‐Chloro‐1,1‐di­fluoro‐N‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)‐3‐(pyrrolidin‐2‐yl­idene)­propan‐2‐imine

In the title compound, C₁₄H₁₅ClF₂N₂O, the Z configuration has been confirmed. The molecular structure shows an intramolecular N—H?N hydrogen bond [H?N 2.04 (6), N?N 2.709 (6) Å and N—H?N 124 (5)°]. This interaction could be responsible for the Z configuration.     

Nonmerohedrally twinned 6‐amino‐3‐methyluracil‐5‐carbaldehyde: a hydrogen‐bonded ribbon containing four types of ring

In the title compound [systematic name: 6‐amino‐5‐formyl‐3‐methylpyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione], C₆H₇N₃O₃, the intramolecular dimensions provide evidence for some polarization of the electronic structure. There is an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond; this and a combination of three intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds generate an almost planar ribbon containing S(6), R₂²(4), R₂¹(6) and R₄⁴(16) rings. These ribbons are linked into sheets by a dipolar carbonyl–carbonyl interaction. The structure was refined as a nonmerohedral twin, with twin fractions 0.7924 (1) and 0.2076 (10).     

(Acetato‐κO)aqua(1H‐imidazole‐κN3)(picolinato‐κ2N,O)copper(II) 0.87‐hydrate: a Z′> 1 structure

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Cu(C₆H₄NO₂)(C₂H₃O₂)(C₃H₄N₂)(H₂O)]·0.87H₂O, has a square‐pyramidal‐coordinated Cu^II centre (the imidazole is trans to the picolinate N atom, the acetate is trans to the picolinate –CO₂ group and the aqua ligand is in a Jahn–Teller‐elongated apical position) and has two symmetry‐independent molecules in the unit cell (Z′ = 2), which are connected through complementary imidazole–picolinate N—H...O hydrogen bonding. The two partially occupied solvent water molecules are each disordered over two positions. The disordered solvent water molecules, together with pseudosymmetry elements, support the notion that a crystal structure with multiple identical chemical formula units in the structural asymmetric unit (Z′ > 1) can represent a crystal `on the way', that is, a kinetic intermediate form which has not yet reached its thermodynamic minimum. Neighbouring molecules form π–π stacks between their imidazole and picolinate N‐heterocycles, with centroid–centroid distances in the range 3.582 (2)–3.764 (2) Å.     

(Z)‐6‐{[1,3‐Dihydroxy‐2‐(hydroxy­methyl)propan‐2‐ylamino]methyl­ene}‐2‐methoxy‐4‐[(E)‐o‐tolyl­diazenyl]­cyclo­hexa‐2,4‐dienone

The title compound, C₁₉H₂₃N₃O₅, adopts the keto–amine tautomeric form with the hydr­oxy H atom located on the N atom, where it is involved in a strong intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. The compound exhibits trans geometry with respect to the azo N=N double bond, with a dihedral angle between the two benzene rings of 38.03 (6)°. The packing of the mol­ecules in the crystal structure is determined by O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. A comparison with closely related compounds is given.     

5′‐Allyl‐2′‐benzoyloxy‐3′‐methoxy‐4‐nitroazobenzene

The structure of the title compound, 4‐allyl‐2‐methoxy‐6‐[(4‐nitrophenyl)diazenyl]phenyl benzoate, C₂₃H₁₉N₃O₅, displays the characteristic features of azobenzene derivatives. The azobenzene moiety of the molecule has a trans configuration and in this moiety, average C—N and N=N bond lengths are 1.441 (3) and 1.241 (3) Å, respectively.     

Redetermination of 6‐amino‐5‐formyl‐1,3‐dimethyluracil monohydrate at 120 K: a polarized molecular structure and two interwoven hydrogen‐bonded frameworks

The title compound [systematic name: 6‐amino‐5‐formyl‐1,3‐dimethylpyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione monohydrate], C₇H₉N₃O₃·H₂O, has been reexamined at 120 K. The improved precision of the intramolecular dimensions provides evidence for a polarized molecular–electronic structure, and the molecular components are linked by one N—H...O and two O—H...O hydrogen bonds into two interwoven three‐dimensional frameworks, which are weakly linked by the longer component of a three‐centre N—H...(O)₂ hydrogen bond.     

Transformations of the chameleon ligand 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione/diol: cis‐dichlorido(1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione‐κ2N,N′)‐trans‐dipyridinecobalt(II) pyridine disolvate prepared from the diol

The title compound, [CoCl₂(C₅H₅N)₂(C₁₂H₆N₂O₂)]·2C₅H₅N, is a neutral Co^II complex with two chloride anions coordinated in a cis fashion, two pyridine ligands in trans positions and a chelating 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione ligand that completes the octahedral coordination geometry. Two pyridine solvent molecules reside in channels (about 7 × 4 Å wide; the closest atom–atom distance within the channel is 10 Å). The three‐dimensional structure supporting these channels is held together by C—H...Cl [3.466 (8)–3.670 (9) Å] and C—H...O [3.014 (9)–3.285 (8) Å] hydrogen bonds, and can be viewed as a CsCl or bcu (body‐centred cubic) net.     

Chains of fused rings in the hydrogen‐bonded structure of meso‐­6,13‐di­amino‐6,13‐di­methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane–2,2′‐biphenol (1/2)

The title compound is a salt, [C₁₂H₃₂N₆]²⁺·2[HOC₆H₄C₆H₄O]^?. The centrosymmetric cation contains two intramolecular N—H?N hydrogen bonds with an N?N distance of 2.8290 (13) Å, and the pendent amino groups are in axial sites; the anion contains an intramolecular O—H?O hydrogen bond with an O?O distance of 2.4656 (11) Å. The ions are linked into continuous chains by means of four types of N—H?O hydrogen bonds with N?O distances ranging from 2.7238 (12) Å to 3.3091 (13) Å, associated with N—H?O angles in the range 148–160°.     

4‐[(2‐Chloro­phenyl)­diazenyl]‐6‐methoxy‐2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one

The structure of the title compound, C₁₈H₂₀ClN₃O₅, displays the characteristic features of azo­benzene derivatives. Intramolecular N—H⋯O, weak intramolecular C—H⋯O, and intermolecular O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O interactions influence the conformation of the mol­ecules and the crystal packing. Intermolecular hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into infinite chains, and the title compound adopts the keto–amine tautomeric form. The azo­benzene moiety of the mol­ecule has a trans configuration. The mol­ecule is not planar, and the dihedral angle between the two phenyl rings is 35.6 (2)°.