Experimental mathematics in the curriculum (part 2)

In part 1 [1] of this work we showed how modern mathematicalresearch could, with a suitably chosen problem, be includedin the first year curriculum of undergraduate mathematicians.With the use of Computer Algebra Systems, even the average undergraduatemathematician can aspire to discover interesting yet still unexplainedbehaviour in many areas of mathematics. Of course, interestingresults still need a true expert to furnish proofs. This articlecontinues the exploration of the so-called Buffon puzzle anddemonstrates how it can be made accessible to undergraduates.Part 1 dealt with material delivered in lectures 1–12.In part 2, we describe work that can be carried out in lectures13–24.     

The relationship between mathematicians’ pedagogical goals,orientations, and common teaching practices in advanced mathematics

Despite mathematics educators’ research into more effective modes of teaching, lecture is still the dominant mode of instruction in undergraduate mathematics courses. Surveys suggest this is because most mathematicians believe this is the best way to teach. This paper answers a call by mathematics education researchers to explore mathematicians’ needs and goals concerning teaching. We interviewed eight mathematicians about findings in the mathematics education research literature concerning common pedagogical practices of instructors of advanced mathematics classes: “chalk talk,” the presentation of formal and informal content, and teacher questioning. We then analyzed the responses for resources, orientations, and goals that might influence the participants to engage in these practices. We describe how participants believed common lecturing practices allowed them to achieve their goals and aligned with their orientations. We discuss these findings in depth and consider what implications they may have for researchers that aim to change mathematicians’ teaching practices.     

Reading mathematics for understanding—From novice to expert

As students progress through the college mathematics curriculum, enter graduate school and eventually become practicing mathematicians, reading mathematics textbooks and journal articles appears to become easier and leads to increased proficiency and understanding. This study was designed to begin to understand how mathematically more advanced readers read for understanding in mathematical exposition as it appears in textbooks compared to first-year undergraduate students. Three faculty members and three graduate students participated in this study and read from a first-year graduate textbook in an area of mathematics unfamiliar to each of them. The observed reading strategies of these more mathematically advanced readers are compared to observed reading strategies of first-year undergraduate students from an earlier study. The reading methods of the faculty level mathematicians were all quite similar and were markedly different from those that have been identified for undergraduate students, as well as from those used by the graduate students in this study. A Mathematics Reading Framework is proposed based on this study and previous research documenting the strategies that first-year undergraduate students use for reading exposition in their mathematics textbooks.     

Researching how professional mathematicians construct new mathematical definitions: a case study

In this work, we study the mathematical practice of defining by mathematics researchers. Since research is an important part of many professional mathematicians, understanding how they do research is a necessary step before thinking about future researchers’ undergraduate and postgraduate education. We focus on the defining process associated with the generalization of existing definitions as a way of constructing new ones. Data of this qualitative study come from a case study whose subject is a mathematics researcher in the area of differential geometry. We have interviewed this researcher and collected her research documents. From our analysis of the data, we have identified four phases in the defining process (Finding an opportunity to generalize an existing concept, Proposing a new definition, Justifying that the new definition is valid and Continuing the chain of definitions), which we will describe in detail in Section 4.     

Images of mathematicians: a new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers

Though women earn nearly half of the mathematics baccalaureate degrees in the United States, they make up a much smaller percentage of those pursuing advanced degrees in mathematics and those entering mathematics-related careers. Through semi-structured interviews, this study took a qualitative look at the beliefs held by five undergraduate women mathematics students about themselves and about mathematicians. The findings of this study suggest that these women held stereotypical beliefs about mathematicians, describing them to be exceptionally intelligent, obsessed with mathematics, and socially inept. Furthermore, each of these women held the firm belief that they do not exhibit at least one of these traits, the first one being unattainable and the latter two being undesirable. The results of this study suggest that although many women are earning undergraduate degrees in mathematics, their beliefs about mathematicians may be preventing them from identifying as one and choosing to pursue mathematical careers.     

Flip or flop? Students’ perspectives of a flipped lecture in mathematics

This paper describes students’ perspectives of a one-off flipped lecture in a large undergraduate mathematics service course. The focus was on calculating matrix determinants and was designed specifically to introduce debate and argumentation into a mathematics lecture. The intention was to promote a deeper learning and understanding through engagement with the added hope of instilling some passion for the subject. During the lecture, students were asked to vote with their feet, literally moving around the lecture theatre to form groups according to their shared favourite technique for calculating matrix determinants. Group discussions were then followed by a whole class debate facilitated by the lecturers, before they wrapped up the lecture by resolving the professional disagreements that had come to light during the debate. Following the lecture, data on student perspectives was gathered using both surveys and focus groups. Within this paper, we share the data and reveal the interesting results that emerged from our analysis. Despite remaining unconvinced as to whether flipped lectures are better for learning, students reported greater engagement and increased understanding of the material covered.     

“Mathematicians Would Say It This Way”: An Investigation of Teachers' Framings of Mathematicians

Although popular media often provides negative images of mathematicians, we contend that mathematics classroom practices can also contribute to students' images of mathematicians. In this study, we examined eight mathematics teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. Here, we analyze classroom observations to explore some of the characteristics of the teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. The findings suggest that there may be a relationship between a teachers' mathematics background and his/her references to mathematicians. We also argue that teachers need to be reflective about how they represent mathematicians to their students, and that preservice teachers should explore their beliefs about what mathematicians actually do.     

Just do it: flipped lecture,determinants and debate

This paper describes a case study of two pure mathematicians who flipped their lecture to teach matrix determinants in two large mathematics service courses (one at Stage I and the other at Stage II). The purpose of the study was to transform the passive lecture into an active learning opportunity and to introduce valuable mathematical skills, such as debate, argument and disagreement. The students were told in advance to use the online material to prepare, which had a short handout on matrix determinants posted, as the lesson would be interactive and would rely on them having studied this. At the beginning of the lesson, the two mathematicians worked together to model the skill of professional disagreement, one arguing for the cofactor expansion method and the other for the row reduction method. After voting for their preferred method, the students worked in small groups on examples to defend their choice. Each group elected a spokesperson and a political style debate followed as the students argued the pros and cons of each technique. Although one lecture does not establish whether the flipped lecture model is preferable for student instruction, the paper presents a case study for pursuing this approach and for further research on incorporating this style of teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics subjects.     

Pre-service teachers' point of views about learning history of mathematics: a case study in Turkey

This study examines pre-service teachers’ points of view about learning history of mathematics during their undergraduate education. An open-ended questionnaire was administered to one hundred and twenty pre-service teachers, during the fall semester of the 2013–14 academic year. The participants indicated that learning history of mathematics could increase their content knowledge as they understand how formulas, theories and relations were developed over time. In addition, it could develop them intellectually as they learn life stories of mathematicians. Also, it could help them to hold the attention of students, and answer some of the why questions. Particularly, they reported using history of mathematics knowledge while teaching Geometry and Numbers.     

Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge

Yehuda Rav’s inspiring paper “Why do we prove theorems?” published in Philosophia Mathematica (1999, 7, pp. 5–41) has interesting implications for mathematics education. We examine Rav’s central ideas on proof—that proofs convey important elements of mathematics such as strategies and methods, that it is “proofs rather than theorems that are the bearers of mathematical knowledge”and thus that proofs should be the primary focus of mathematical interest—and then discuss their significance for mathematics education in general and for the teaching of proof in particular.     

Group Theory,Computational Thinking,and Young Mathematicians

In this article, we investigate the artistic puzzle of designing mathematics experiences (MEs) to engage young children with ideas of group theory, using a combination of hands-on and computational thinking (CT) tools. We elaborate on: (1) group theory and why we chose it as a context for young mathematicians’ experiences with symmetry and transformations; (2) our ME design principles of agency, access, surprise and audience; (3) the affordances of CT that complement our design principles; and (4) three ME variations we tested in grades 3–6 classrooms. We then reflect on the ME variations based on our design principles and the affordances of CT, and consider how the MEs may be further adapted and improved.     

An Experiment in Teaching College Mathematics†

Kac has observed that the ideal preparation in mathematics, especially for non‐mathematicians, should focus not on acquiring skills but on acquiring certain attitudes. We administered a special attitude questionnaire to a sample of graduate students in mathematics and undergraduate speech majors. We found significant differences on 10 of 27 items on this test. We then administered this test to a mixed group of undergraduates at the beginning and at the end of a special experimental mathematics ‘course’ designed to modify and shape attitudes. We found changes in attitudes in the intended direction. The primary aims of the experimental course were to:

1. Get students without any prior acquaintance with mathematics or a fear thereof to approach their studies more analytically.

2. Acquire orientation to and acquaintance with 25‐75 basic concepts and methods covering sets, algebra, logic, computers, analysis, probability, math‐statistics and topology in an over‐all map of how they logically fit together and how they relate to problems of modern life.

3. Read, with appreciation, mathematical literature previously incomprehensible to them. These aims were met.

     

How some research mathematicians and statisticians use proof in undergraduate mathematics

The paper examines the roles and purposes of proof mentioned by university research faculty when reflecting on their own teaching and teaching at their institutions. Interview responses from 14 research mathematicians and statisticians who also teach are reported. The results suggest there is a great deal of variation in the role and purpose of proof in and among mathematics courses and that factors such as the course title, audience, and instructor influence this variation. The results also suggest that, for this diverse group, learning how to prove theorems is the most prominent role of proof in upper division undergraduate mathematics courses and that this training is considered preparation for graduate mathematics studies. Absent were responses discussing proof's role in preparing K-12 mathematics teachers. Implications for a proof and proving landscape for school mathematics are discussed.     

BSHM meetings

In a deliberately provocative first part to this paper, I argue that nineteenth-century British mathematicians had an unduly high opinion of themselves and a striking lack of appreciation for contemporary continental developments. I argue that this failure was rooted in the institutions that supported mathematics, and was only remedied towards the end of the century. In the more sober second half of the paper I ask if historians of mathematics have subscribed to this overestimate, and explore some related questions, among them what are historians doing when they write history: telling it as it was, or righting or defending the record? Historians of mathematics also need to consider British priorities for research in the nineteenth century, and a comparison with other minor players (such as Japan, Portugal, or Poland) might be illuminating.     

Impacts of inquiry pedagogy on undergraduate students conceptions of the function of proof

Mathematicians and mathematics educators agree that proof is an important tool in mathematics, yet too often undergraduate students see proof as a superficial part of the discipline. While proof is often used by mathematicians to justify that a theorem is true, many times proof is used for another purpose entirely such as to explain why a particular statement is true or to show mathematics students a particular proof technique. This paper reports on a study that used a form of inquiry-based learning (IBL) in an introduction to proof course and measured the beliefs of students in this course about the different functions of proof in mathematics as compared to students in a non-IBL course. It was found that undergraduate students in an introduction to proof course had a more robust understanding of the functions of proof than previous studies would suggest. Additionally, students in the course taught using inquiry pedagogy were more likely to appreciate the communication, intellectual challenge, and providing autonomy functions of proof. It is hypothesized that these results are a response to the pedagogy of the course and the types of student activity that were emphasized.     

N.G. de Bruijn’s contribution to the formalization of mathematics

N.G. (Dick) de Bruijn was the first to develop a formal language suitable for the complete expression of a mathematical subject matter. His formalization does not only regard the usual mathematical expressions, but also all sorts of meta-notions such as definitions, substitutions, theorems and even complete proofs. He envisaged (and demonstrated) that a full formalization enables one to check proofs automatically by means of a computer program. He started developing his ideas about a suitable formal language for mathematics in the end of the 1960s, when computers were still in their infancy. De Bruijn was ahead of his time and much of his work only became known to a wider audience much later. In the present paper we highlight de Bruijn’s contributions to the formalization of mathematics, directed towards verification by a computer, by placing these in their time and by relating them to parallel and later developments. We aim to explain some of the more technical aspects of de Bruijn’s work to a wider audience of interested mathematicians and computer scientists.