Large Monotone Paths in Graphs with Bounded Degree

 We prove that for every ε>0 and positive integer r, there exists Δ₀=Δ₀(ε) such that if Δ>Δ₀ and n>n(Δ,ε,r) then there exists a packing of K _n with ⌊(n−1)/Δ⌋ graphs, each having maximum degree at most Δ and girth at least r, where at most εn ² edges are unpacked. This result is used to prove the following: Let f be an assignment of real numbers to the edges of a graph G. Let α(G,f) denote the maximum length of a monotone simple path of G with respect to f. Let α(G) be the minimum of α(G,f), ranging over all possible assignments. Now let α_Δ be the maximum of α(G) ranging over all graphs with maximum degree at most Δ. We prove that Δ+1≥α_Δ≥Δ(1−o(1)). This extends some results of Graham and Kleitman [6] and of Calderbank et al. [4] who considered α(K _n ). Received: March 15, 1999?Final version received: October 22, 1999     

Bipartite rainbow numbers of matchings

Given two graphs G and H, let f(G,H) denote the maximum number c for which there is a way to color the edges of G with c colors such that every subgraph H of G has at least two edges of the same color. Equivalently, any edge-coloring of G with at least rb(G,H)=f(G,H)+1 colors contains a rainbow copy of H, where a rainbow subgraph of an edge-colored graph is such that no two edges of it have the same color. The number rb(G,H) is called the rainbow number ofHwith respect toG, and simply called the bipartite rainbow number ofH if G is the complete bipartite graph K_m,n. Erd?s, Simonovits and Sós showed that rb(K_n,K₃)=n. In 2004, Schiermeyer determined the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,K_k) for all n≥k≥4, and the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,kK₂) for all k≥2 and n≥3k+3. In this paper we will determine the rainbow numbers rb(K_m,n,kK₂) for all k≥1.     

An application of the regularity lemma in generalized Ramsey theory

Given graphs G and H, an edge coloring of G is called an (H,q)‐coloring if the edges of every copy of H ? G together receive at least q colors. Let r(G,H,q) denote the minimum number of colors in a (H,q)‐coloring of G. In 9 Erd?s and Gyárfás studied r(K_n,K_p,q) if p and q are fixed and n tends to infinity. They determined for every fixed p the smallest q (denoted by q_lin) for which r(K_n,K_p,q) is linear in n and the smallest q (denoted by q_quad) for which r(K_n,K_p,q) is quadratic in n. They raised the problem of determining the smallest q for which we have . In this paper by using the Regularity Lemma we show that if , then we have . © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 44: 39–49, 2003     

Facial non‐repetitive edge‐coloring of plane graphs

A sequence r₁, r₂, …, r_2n such that r_i=r_{n+ i} for all 1≤i≤n is called a repetition. A sequence S is called non‐repetitive if no block (i.e. subsequence of consecutive terms of S) is a repetition. Let G be a graph whose edges are colored. A trail is called non‐repetitive if the sequence of colors of its edges is non‐repetitive. If G is a plane graph, a facial non‐repetitive edge‐coloring of G is an edge‐coloring such that any facial trail (i.e. a trail of consecutive edges on the boundary walk of a face) is non‐repetitive. We denote π′_f(G) the minimum number of colors of a facial non‐repetitive edge‐coloring of G. In this article, we show that π′_f(G)≤8 for any plane graph G. We also get better upper bounds for π′_f(G) in the cases when G is a tree, a plane triangulation, a simple 3‐connected plane graph, a hamiltonian plane graph, an outerplanar graph or a Halin graph. The bound 4 for trees is tight. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 66: 38–48, 2010     

Partitioning complete multipartite graphs by monochromatic trees

The tree partition number of an r‐edge‐colored graph G, denoted by t_r(G), is the minimum number k such that whenever the edges of G are colored with r colors, the vertices of G can be covered by at most k vertex‐disjoint monochromatic trees. We determine t₂(K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k)) of the complete k‐partite graph K(n₁, n₂,…, n_k). In particular, we prove that t₂(K(n, m)) = ? (m‐2)/2ⁿ? + 2, where 1 ≤ n ≤ m. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 48: 133–141, 2005     

On Some Three-Color Ramsey Numbers

 In this paper we study three-color Ramsey numbers. Let K _i,j denote a complete i by j bipartite graph. We shall show that (i) for any connected graphs G ₁, G ₂ and G ₃, if r(G ₁, G ₂)≥s(G ₃), then r(G ₁, G ₂, G ₃)≥(r(G ₁, G ₂)−1)(χ(G ₃)−1)+s(G ₃), where s(G ₃) is the chromatic surplus of G ₃; (ii) (k+m−2)(n−1)+1≤r(K _1,k , K _1,m , K _n )≤ (k+m−1)(n−1)+1, and if k or m is odd, the second inequality becomes an equality; (iii) for any fixed m≥k≥2, there is a constant c such that r(K _k,m , K _k,m , K _n )≤c(n/logn), and r(C _2m , C _2m , K _n )≤c(n/logn) ^m/(m−1) for sufficiently large n. Received: July 25, 2000 Final version received: July 30, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" Partially supported by RGC, Hong Kong; FRG, Hong Kong Baptist University; and by NSFC, the scientific foundations of education ministry of China, and the foundations of Jiangsu Province Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to the referee for his valuable comments. AMS 2000 MSC: 05C55     

On three zero-sum Ramsey-type problems

For a graph G whose number of edges is divisible by k, let R(G,Z_k) denote the minimum integer r such that for every function f: E(K_r) ? Z_k there is a copy G¹ of G in K_r so that Σe∈E(G¹) f(e) = 0 (in Z_k). We prove that for every integer k₁ R(K_n, Z_k) ≤ n + O(k³ log k) provided n is sufficiently large as a function of k and k divides (). If, in addition, k is an odd prime-power then R(K_n, Z_k) ≤ n + 2k - 2 and this is tight if k is a prime that divides n. A related result is obtained for hypergraphs. It is further shown that for every graph G on n vertices with an even number of edges R(G,Z₂) ≤ n + 2. This estimate is sharp. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

The characterization of zero-sum (mod 2) bipartite Ramsey numbers

Let G be a bipartite graph, with k|e(G). The zero-sum bipartite Ramsey number B(G, Z_k) is the smallest integer t such that in every Z_k-coloring of the edges of K_t,t, there is a zero-sum mod k copy of G in K_t,t. In this article we give the first proof that determines B(G, Z₂) for all possible bipartite graphs G. In fact, we prove a much more general result from which B(G, Z₂) can be deduced: Let G be a (not necessarily connected) bipartite graph, which can be embedded in K_n,n, and let F be a field. A function f : E(K_n,n) → F is called G-stable if every copy of G in K_n,n has the same weight (the weight of a copy is the sum of the values of f on its edges). The set of all G-stable functions, denoted by U(G, K_n,n, F) is a linear space, which is called the K_n,n uniformity space of G over F. We determine U(G, K_n,n, F) and its dimension, for all G, n and F. Utilizing this result in the case F = Z₂, we can compute B(G, Z₂), for all bipartite graphs G. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Graph Theory 29: 151–166, 1998     

Rainbows in the Hypercube

Let Q_n be a hypercube of dimension n, that is, a graph whose vertices are binary n-tuples and two vertices are adjacent iff the corresponding n-tuples differ in exactly one position. An edge coloring of a graph H is called rainbow if no two edges of H have the same color. Let f(G,H) be the largest number of colors such that there exists an edge coloring of G with f(G,H) colors such that no subgraph isomorphic to H is rainbow. In this paper we start the investigation of this anti-Ramsey problem by providing bounds on f(Q_n,Q_k) which are asymptotically tight for k = 2 and by giving some exact results.     

Disjoint Kr-minors in large graphs with given average degree

It is proved that there are functions f(r) and N(r,s) such that for every positive integer r, s, each graph G with average degree d(G)=2|E(G)|/|V(G)|≥f(r), and with at least N(r,s) vertices has a minor isomorphic to K_r,s or to the union of s disjoint copies of K_r.     

Partitioning complete graphs by heterochromatic trees

A heterochromatic tree is an edge-colored tree in which any two edges have different colors. The heterochromatic tree partition number of an r-edge-colored graph G, denoted by t _r (G), is the minimum positive integer p such that whenever the edges of the graph G are colored with r colors, the vertices of G can be covered by at most p vertex-disjoint heterochromatic trees. In this paper we determine the heterochromatic tree partition number of r-edge-colored complete graphs. We also find at most t _r (K _n ) vertex-disjoint heterochromatic trees to cover all the vertices in polynomial time for a given r-edge-coloring of K _n .     

Constrained Ramsey numbers for rainbow matching

The Ramsey number R_k(G) of a graph G is the minimum number N, such that any edge coloring of K_N with k colors contains a monochromatic copy of G. The constrained Ramsey number f(G, T) of the graphs G and T is the minimum number N, such that any edge coloring of K_N with any number of colors contains a monochromatic copy of G or a rainbow copy of T. We show that these two quantities are closely related when T is a matching. Namely, for almost all graphs G, f(G, tK₂) = R_{t ? 1}(G) for t≥2. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 67:91‐95, 2011     

Finding a monochromatic subgraph or a rainbow path

For simple graphs G and H, let f(G,H) denote the least integer N such that every coloring of the edges of K_N contains either a monochromatic copy of G or a rainbow copy of H. Here we investigate f(G,H) when H = P_k. We show that even if the number of colors is unrestricted when defining f(G,H), the function f(G,P_k), for k = 4 and 5, equals the (k ? 2)‐ coloring diagonal Ramsey number of G. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Circular consecutive choosability of k‐choosable graphs

Let S(r) denote a circle of circumference r. The circular consecutive choosability ch_cc(G) of a graph G is the least real number t such that for any r≥χ_c(G), if each vertex v is assigned a closed interval L(v) of length t on S(r), then there is a circular r‐coloring f of G such that f(v)∈L(v). We investigate, for a graph, the relations between its circular consecutive choosability and choosability. It is proved that for any positive integer k, if a graph G is k‐choosable, then ch_cc(G)?k + 1 ? 1/k; moreover, the bound is sharp for k≥3. For k = 2, it is proved that if G is 2‐choosable then ch_cc(G)?2, while the equality holds if and only if G contains a cycle. In addition, we prove that there exist circular consecutive 2‐choosable graphs which are not 2‐choosable. In particular, it is shown that ch_cc(G) = 2 holds for all cycles and for K_{2, n} with n≥2. On the other hand, we prove that ch_cc(G)>2 holds for many generalized theta graphs. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 67: 178‐197, 2011     

Properly colored subgraphs and rainbow subgraphs in edge‐colorings with local constraints

We consider a canonical Ramsey type problem. An edge‐coloring of a graph is called m‐good if each color appears at most m times at each vertex. Fixing a graph G and a positive integer m, let f(m, G) denote the smallest n such that every m‐good edge‐coloring of K_n yields a properly edge‐colored copy of G, and let g(m, G) denote the smallest n such that every m‐good edge‐coloring of K_n yields a rainbow copy of G. We give bounds on f(m, G) and g(m, G). For complete graphs G = K_t, we have c₁mt²/ln t ≤ f(m, K_t) ≤ c₂mt², and cmt³/ln t ≤ g(m, K_t) ≤ cmt³/ln t, where c₁, c₂, c, c are absolute constants. We also give bounds on f(m, G) and g(m, G) for general graphs G in terms of degrees in G. In particular, we show that for fixed m and d, and all sufficiently large n compared to m and d, f(m, G) = n for all graphs G with n vertices and maximum degree at most d. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2003     

Multiple vertex coverings by specified induced subgraphs

Given graphs H₁,…, H_k, let f(H₁,…, H_k) be the minimum order of a graph G such that for each i, the induced copies of H_i in G cover V(G). We prove constructively that f(H₁, H₂) ≤ 2(n(H₁) + n(H₂) − 2); equality holds when H₁ = H ₂ = K_n. We prove that f(H₁, K _n) = n + 2√δ(H₁)n + O(1) as n → ∞. We also determine f(K_{1, m −1}, K _n) exactly. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 180–190, 2000     

Constrained Ramsey numbers of graphs

Given two graphs G and H, let f(G,H) denote the minimum integer n such that in every coloring of the edges of K_n, there is either a copy of G with all edges having the same color or a copy of H with all edges having different colors. We show that f(G,H) is finite iff G is a star or H is acyclic. If S and T are trees with s and t edges, respectively, we show that 1+s(t?2)/2≤f(S,T)≤(s?1)(t²+3t). Using constructions from design theory, we establish the exact values, lying near (s?1)(t?1), for f(S,T) when S and T are certain paths or star‐like trees. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 42: 1–16, 2003     

Jackson's theorem for compact connected Lie groups

We prove that for f ε E = C(G) or L^p(G), 1 p < ∞, where G is any compact connected Lie group, and for n 1, there is a trigonometric polynomial t_n on G of degree n so that f − t_nE C_rω_r(n⁻¹,f). Here ω_r(t, f) denotes the rth modulus of continuity of f. Using this and sharp estimates of the Lebesgue constants recently obtained by Giulini and Travaglini, we obtain “best possible” criteria for the norm convergence of the Fourier series of f.     

Limit theorems for monochromatic stars

Let T(K_1,r,G_n) be the number of monochromatic copies of the r‐star K_1,r in a uniformly random coloring of the vertices of the graph G_n. In this paper we provide a complete characterization of the limiting distribution of T(K_1,r,G_n), in the regime where is bounded, for any growing sequence of graphs G_n. The asymptotic distribution is a sum of mutually independent components, each term of which is a polynomial of a single Poisson random variable of degree at most r. Conversely, any limiting distribution of T(K_1,r,G_n) has a representation of this form. Examples and connections to the birthday problem are discussed.     

On the existence of two non-neighboring subgraphs in a graph

Does there exist a functionf(r, n) such that each graphG with _Z (G)≧f(r, n) contains either a complete subgraph of orderr or else two non-neighboringn-chromatic subgraphs? It is known thatf(r, 2) exists and we establish the existence off(r, 3). We also give some interesting results about graphs which do not contain two independent edges.