Mixed‐Valence Ruthenium Complexes Rotating through a Conformational Robin–Day Continuum

The conformational energy landscape and the associated electronic structure and spectroscopic properties (UV/Vis/near‐infrared (NIR) and IR) of three formally d⁵/d⁶ mixed‐valence diruthenium complex cations, [{Ru(dppe)Cp*}₂(μ‐C≡CC₆H₄C≡C)]⁺, [ 1 ]⁺, [trans‐{RuCl(dppe)₂}₂(μ‐C≡CC₆H₄C≡C)]⁺, [ 2 ]⁺, and the Creutz–Taube ion, [{Ru(NH₃)₅}₂(μ‐pz)]⁵⁺, [ 3 ]⁵⁺ (Cp=cyclopentadienyl; dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane; pz=pyrazine), have been studied using a nonstandard hybrid density functional BLYP35 with 35 % exact exchange and continuum solvent models. For the closely related monocations [ 1 ]⁺ and [ 2 ]⁺, the calculations indicated that the lowest‐energy conformers exhibited delocalized electronic structures (or class III mixed‐valence character). However, these minima alone explained neither the presence of shoulder(s) in the NIR absorption envelope nor the presence of features in the observed vibrational spectra characteristic of both delocalized and valence‐trapped electronic structures. A series of computational models have been used to demonstrate that the mutual conformation of the metal fragments—and even more importantly the orientation of the bridging ligand relative to those metal centers—influences the electronic coupling sufficiently to afford valence‐trapped conformations, which are of sufficiently low energy to be thermally populated. Areas in the conformational phase space with variable degrees of symmetry breaking of structures and spin‐density distributions are shown to be responsible for the characteristic spectroscopic features of these two complexes. The Creutz–Taube ion [ 3 ]⁵⁺ also exhibits low‐lying valence‐trapped conformational areas, but the electronic transitions that characterize these conformations with valence‐localized electronic structures have low intensities and do not influence the observed spectroscopic characteristics to any notable extent.     

Class III Delocalization in a Cyanide‐Bridged Trimetallic Mixed‐Valence Complex

The NIR and IR spectroscopic properties of the cyanide‐bridged complex, trans‐[Ru(dmap)₄{(μ‐CN)Ru(py)₄Cl}₂]³⁺ (py=pyridine, dmap=4‐dimethylaminopyridine) provide strong evidence that this trimetallic ion behaves as a Class III mixed‐valence species, the first example reported of a cyanide‐bridged system. This has been accomplished by tuning the energy of the fragments in the trimetallic complex to compensate for the intrinsic asymmetry of the cyanide bridge. Moreover, (TD)DFT calculations accurately predict the spectra of the trans‐[Ru(dmap)₄{(μ‐CN)Ru(py)₄Cl}₂]³⁺ ion and confirms its delocalized nature.     

Tetrathiafulvalene‐Based Mixed‐Valence Acceptor–Donor–Acceptor Triads: A Joint Theoretical and Experimental Approach

This work presents a joint theoretical and experimental characterisation of the structural and electronic properties of two tetrathiafulvalene (TTF)‐based acceptor–donor–acceptor triads (BQ–TTF–BQ and BTCNQ–TTF—BTCNQ; BQ is naphthoquinone and BTCNQ is benzotetracyano‐p‐quinodimethane) in their neutral and reduced states. The study is performed with the use of electrochemical, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and UV/Vis/NIR spectroelectrochemical techniques guided by quantum‐chemical calculations. Emphasis is placed on the mixed‐valence properties of both triads in their radical anion states. The electrochemical and EPR results reveal that both BQ–TTF–BQ and BTCNQ–TTF–BTCNQ triads in their radical anion states behave as class‐II mixed‐valence compounds with significant electronic communication between the acceptor moieties. Density functional theory calculations (BLYP35/cc‐pVTZ), taking into account the solvent effects, predict charge‐localised species (BQ ^{. ?}–TTF–BQ and BTCNQ ^{. ?}–TTF–BTCNQ) as the most stable structures for the radical anion states of both triads. A stronger localisation is found both experimentally and theoretically for the BTCNQ–TTF–BTCNQ anion, in accordance with the more electron‐withdrawing character of the BTCNQ acceptor. CASSCF/CASPT2 calculations suggest that the low‐energy, broad absorption bands observed experimentally for the BQ–TTF–BQ and BTCNQ–TTF–BTCNQ radical anions are associated with the intervalence charge transfer (IV‐CT) electronic transition and two nearby donor‐to‐acceptor CT excitations. The study highlights the molecular efficiency of the electron‐donor TTF unit as a molecular wire connecting two acceptor redox centres.     

Asymmetric Mixed‐Valence Complexes that Consist of Cyclometalated Ruthenium and Ferrocene: Synthesis,Characterization, and Electronic‐Coupling Studies

Three bis‐tridentate ferrocene‐containing cyclometalated ruthenium complexes, [(Fcdpb)Ru(tpy)]⁺ ( 1 ⁺), [(Fctpy)Ru(dpb)]⁺ ( 2 ⁺), and [(Fcdpb)Ru(Fctpy)]⁺ ( 3 ⁺), have been prepared and characterized, where Fcdpb is the 2‐deprotonated form of 1,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐ferrocenylbenzene, tpy is 2,2′:6′,2“‐terpyridine, dpb is the 2‐deprotonated form of 1,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)benzene, and Fctpy is 4′‐ferrocenyl‐2,2′:6′,2”‐terpyridine. Single crystals of compounds 2 ⁺ and 3 ⁺ have been studied by X‐ray analysis. Complexes 1 ⁺ and 2 ⁺ displayed two anodic redox waves, whilst three well‐separated redox couples were observed for compound 3 ⁺. A combined experimental and computational study suggested that the ferrocene unit on the Fcdpb moiety in compounds 1 ⁺ and 3 ⁺ was oxidized first. In contrast, the order of the oxidation of ruthenium and ferrocene in complex 2 ⁺ was reversed. Metal‐to‐metal‐charge‐transfer transitions (MM′CT) have been observed for the singly oxidized states 1 ²⁺, 2 ²⁺, and 3 ²⁺ in the near‐infrared region. Hush analysis showed that the metal–metal electronic couplings in compounds 1 ²⁺ and 3 ²⁺ were much stronger than those in compound 2 ²⁺.     

Pressure versus Temperature Effects on Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Mixed‐Valence Complexes

Mixed‐valence trinuclear carboxylates, [M₃O(O₂CR)₆L₃] (M=metal, L=terminal ligand), have small differences in potential energy between the configurations M^IIM^IIIM^III?? M^IIIM^IIM^III??M^IIIM^IIIM^II, which means that small external changes can have large structural effects, owing to the differences in coordination geometry between M²⁺ and M³⁺ sites (e.g., about 0.2 Å for Fe? O bond lengths). It is well‐established that the electron transfer (ET) between the metal sites in these mixed‐valence molecules is strongly dependent on temperature and on the specific crystal environment; however, herein, for the first time, we examine the effect of pressure on the electron transfer. Based on single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data that were measured at 15, 90, 100, 110, 130, 160, and 298 K on three different crystals, we first unexpectedly found that our batch of Fe₃O (O₂CC(CH₃)₃)₆(C₅H₅N)₃ ( 1 ) exhibited a different temperature dependence of the ET process than previous studies of compound 1 have shown. We observed a phase transition at around 130 K that was related to complete valence trapping and Hirshfeld surface analysis revealed that this phase transition was governed by a subtle competition between C? H???π and π???π intermolecular interactions. Subsequent high‐pressure single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction at pressures of 0.15, 0.35, 0.45, 0.74, and 0.96 GPa revealed that it was not possible to trigger the phase transition (i.e., valence trapping) by a reduction of the unit‐cell volume, owing to this external pressure. We conclude that modulation of the ET process requires anisotropic changes in the intermolecular interactions, which occur when various directional chemical bonds are affected differently by changes in temperature, but not by the application of pressure.     

Transition from a Metal‐Localized Mixed‐Valence Compound to a Fully Delocalized and Bridge‐Biased Electrophore in a Ruthenium–Amine–Ruthenium Tricenter System

A series of cyclometalated diruthenium complexes with a redox‐active amine bridge were synthesized. Depending on the terminal ligands of the ruthenium components and the substituent on the amine unit, the one‐electron‐oxidized state can be either in the form of a weakly or strongly coupled mixed‐valence diruthenium complex, a fully charge‐delocalized three‐center system, or a bridge‐biased electrophore. This transition among different electronic forms was supported by electrochemistry, near‐infrared absorption, electron paramagnetic resonance, and density functional theory analysis.     

Intercage Electron Transfer Driven by Electric Field in Robin–Day‐Type Molecules

A new class of isomers, namely, intercage electron‐transfer isomers, is reported for fluorinated double‐cage molecular anion e^?@C₂₀F₁₈(NH)₂C₂₀F₁₈ with C₂₀F₁₈ cages: 1 with the excess electron inside the left cage, 2 with the excess electron inside both cages, and 3 with the excess electron inside the right cage. Interestingly, the C₂₀F₁₈ cages may be considered as two redox sites existing in a rare nonmetal mixed‐valent (0 and ?1) molecular anion. The three isomers with two redox sites may be the founding members of a new class of mixed‐valent compounds, namely, nonmetal Robin–Day Class II with localized redox centers for 1 and 3 , and Class III with delocalized redox centers for 2 . Two intercage electron‐transfers pathways involving transfer of one or half an excess electron from one cage to the other are found: 1) Manipulating the external electric field (?0.001 a.u. for 1 → 3 and ?0.0005 a.u. for 1 → 2 ) and 2) Exciting the transition from ground to first excited state and subsequent radiationless transition from the excited state to another ground state for 1 and 3 . For the exhibited microscopic electron‐transfer process 1 → 3 , 2 may be the transition state, and the electron‐transfer barrier of 6.021 kcal mol^?1 is close to the electric field work of 8.04 kcal mol^?1.     

Controlling Through‐Space and Through‐Bond Exchange Pathways in Bis‐Cobaltocenes for Molecular Spintronics

Pinching molecules via chemical strain suggests intuitive consequences, such as compression at the pinched site and clothespin‐like opening of other parts of the structure. If this opening affects two spin centers, it should result in reduced communication between them. We show that for naphthalene‐bridged biscobaltocenes with competing through‐space and through‐bond pathways, the consequences of pinching are far less intuitive: despite the known dominance of through‐space interactions, the bridge plays a much larger role for exchange spin coupling than previously assumed. Based on a combination of chemical synthesis, structural, magnetic, and redox characterization, and a newly developed theoretical pathway analysis, we can suggest a comprehensive explanation for this non‐intuitive behavior. These results are of interest for molecular spintronics, as naphthalene‐linked cobaltocenes can form wires on surfaces for potential spin‐only information transfer.     

Electronic coupling in a highly preorganized bimetallic complex comprising pyrazolate-bridged CpMn(CO)2 moieties

By means of a multistep synthetic procedure a dimanganese complex has been prepared, in which a N,N'-bridging pyrazolate ligand spans two CpMn(CO)(2) subunits in a highly preorganized chelate arrangement. The Xray crystallographic analyses of the Mn(I)Mn(I) complex K(+)1(-) and of its non-chelate precursor complex elucidate details of the molecular structure, in particular an unusual pyrazolate binding mode in the solid state and intertwining of the CO ligands in the crowded bimetallic array 1(-). The Mn(I)Mn(I) compound (1(-)), the mixed-valent Mn(I)Mn(II) (1), and the oxidized Mn(II)Mn(II) form (1(+)) have been characterized by various analytical and spectrosopic methods, such as electrochemistry, variable-temperature EPR spectroscopy, IR spectroelectrochemistry, and UV/Vis/NIR spectroelectrochemistry as well as by DFT and TD-DFT calculations. Strong electronic coupling in the mixed-valent complex is observed, but time- (and temperature-) dependent valence detrapping occurs, thus placing 1 in class II according to the Robin and Day assignment, close to the class II/III transition. From variable-temperature EPR spectroscopy a rough estimate of the activation energy and rate for thermal electron transfer can be deduced, with E(th) ( not equal )=13.6 kJ mol(-1) and k(th)=2.6 x 10(10) s(-1) at 298 K. Unexpectedly, no intervalence CT transition for 1 is detected in solution, but one appears in the optical spectrum of solid 1. The conclusions drawn from experiments are fully supported by DFT calculations that were carried out for all three forms of the dimanganese complex. A broken symmetry treatment for mixed-valent 1 reveals almost perfect localization of both spin and charge on one Mn center. According to TD-DFT the first excited states of 1 give rise to the IT processes in the NIR-energy region, as observed in the solid-state spectrum. The HOMOs are located at the Mn ions and are favorably arranged for pi interactions with the bridging pyrazolate.     

Electronic Coupling between Two Amine Redox Sites through the 5,5′‐Positions of Metal‐Chelating 2,2′‐Bipyridines

Electron delocalization of new mixed‐valent (MV) systems with the aid of lateral metal chelation is reported. 2,2′‐Bipyridine (bpy) derivatives with one or two appended di‐p‐anisylamino groups on the 5,5′‐positions and a coordinated [Ru(bpy)₂] (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine), [Re(CO)₃Cl], or [Ir(ppy)₂] (ppy=2‐phenylpyridine) component were prepared. The single‐crystal molecular structure of the bis‐amine ligand without metal chelation is presented. The electronic properties of these complexes were studied and compared by electrochemical and spectroscopic techniques and DFT/TDDFT calculations. Compounds with two di‐p‐anisylamino groups were oxidized by a chemical or electrochemical method and monitored by near‐infrared (NIR) absorption spectral changes. Marcus–Hush analysis of the resulting intervalence charge‐transfer transitions indicated that electron coupling of these mixed‐valent systems is enhanced by metal chelation and that the iridium complex has the largest coupling. TDDFT calculations were employed to interpret the NIR transitions of these MV systems.     

A Combined Experimental and Computational Study of Linear Ruthenium(II) Coordination Oligomers with End‐Capping Organic Redox Sites: Insight into the Light Absorption and Charge Delocalization

Two series of linear ruthenium coordination oligomers, [(Ntpy)Ru_n(tppz)_n?1(tpy)]²ⁿ⁺ (mono‐Ntpy series, n=1–3) and [(Ntpy)₂Ru_n(tppz)_n?1]²ⁿ⁺ (bis‐Ntpy series, n=1–3) have been prepared, where Ntpy is the capping ligand 4′‐di‐p‐anisylamino‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine, tppz is tetra‐2‐pyridylpyrazine, and tpy is 2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine. The electrochemical measurements evidence oxidation events from both the amine segments and the metal centers and reduction waves from tppz and the capping ligands. Both series complexes display much enhanced light absorption with respect to model complexes without terminal amine units. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been performed on both series and time‐dependent DFT (TD‐DFT) calculations have been performed on the bis‐Ntpy‐series compounds (n=1–4) to characterize their electronic structures and excited states and predict the electronic properties of long‐chain polymers. Upon one‐electron oxidation, the mono‐Ntpy‐series monoruthenium and diruthenium complexes display N⁺‐localized transitions and metal‐to‐nitrogen charge‐transfer (MNCT) transitions in the near‐infrared (NIR) region. DFT and TD‐DFT computations on the one‐electron‐oxidized forms of the mono‐Ntpy‐series compounds (n=1–4) provide insight into the nature of the MNCT transitions and the degree of charge delocalization.     

Correspondence of RuIIIRuII and RuIVRuIII Mixed Valent States in a Small Dinuclear Complex

The diruthenium(III) compound [(μ‐oxa){Ru(acac)₂}₂] [ 1 , oxa^2?=oxamidato(2?), acac^?=2,4‐pentanedionato] exhibits an S=1 ground state with antiferromagnetic spin‐spin coupling (J=?40 cm^?1). The molecular structure in the crystal of 1? 2 C₇H₈ revealed an intramolecular metal–metal distance of 5.433 Å and a notable asymmetry within the bridging ligand. Cyclic voltammetry and spectroelectrochemistry (EPR, UV/Vis/NIR) of the two‐step reduction and of the two‐step oxidation (irreversible second step) produced monocation and monoanion intermediates (K_c=10^5.9) with broad NIR absorption bands (ε ca. 2000 M ^?1 cm^?1) and maxima at 1800 ( 1 ^?) and 1500 nm ( 1 ⁺). TD‐DFT calculations support a Ru^IIIRu^II formulation for 1 ^? with a doublet ground state. The 1 ⁺ ion (Ru^IVRu^III) was calculated with an S=3/2 ground state and the doublet state higher in energy (ΔE=694.6 cm^?1). The Mulliken spin density calculations showed little participation of the ligand bridge in the spin accommodation for all paramagnetic species [(μ‐oxa){Ru(acac)₂}₂]ⁿ, n=+1, 0, ?1, and, accordingly, the NIR absorptions were identified as metal‐to‐metal (intervalence) charge transfers. Whereas only one such NIR band was observed for the Ru^IIIRu^II (4d⁵/4d⁶) system 1 ^?, the Ru^IVRu^III (4d⁴/4d⁵) form 1 ⁺ exhibited extended absorbance over the UV/Vis/NIR range.     

Substituent and Solvent Effects on the Electrochemical Properties and Intervalence Transfer in Asymmetric Mixed‐Valent Complexes Consisting of Cyclometalated Ruthenium and Ferrocene

Four heterodimetallic complexes [Ru(Fcdpb)(L)](PF₆) (Fcdpb=2‐deprotonated form of 1,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐ferrocenylbenzene; L=2,6‐bis‐(N‐methylbenzimidazolyl)‐pyridine (Mebip), 2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (tpy), 4‐nitro‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (NO₂tpy), and trimethyl‐4,4′,4′′‐tricarboxylate‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (Me₃tctpy)) have been prepared. The electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical properties of these complexes have been examined in CH₂Cl₂, CH₃NO₂, CH₃CN, and acetone. These complexes display two consecutive redox couples owing to the stepwise oxidation of the ferrocene (Fc) and ruthenium units, respectively. The potential difference, ΔE_1/2 (E_1/2(Ru^II/III)?E_1/2(Fc^0/+)), decreased slightly with increasing solvent donocity. The mixed‐valent states of these complexes have been generated by electrolysis and the resulting intervalence charge‐transfer (IVCT) bands have been analyzed by Hush theory. Good linear relationships exist between the energy of the IVCT band, E_op, and ΔE_1/2 of four mixed‐valent complexes in a given solvent.     

Tuning the Electronic Coupling in Cyclometalated Diruthenium Complexes through Substituent Effects: A Correlation between the Experimental and Calculated Results

A common bridging ligand, 3,3′,5,5′‐tetrakis(N‐methylbenzimidazol‐2‐yl)biphenyl, and four terpyridine terminal ligands with various substituents (amine, tolyl, nitro, and ester groups) have been used to synthesize ten cyclometalated diruthenium complexes 1 ²⁺– 10 ²⁺. Among them, compounds 1 ²⁺– 6 ²⁺ are redox nonsymmetric, and others are symmetric. These complexes show two Ru^III/II processes and an intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) transition in the one‐electron oxidized state. The potential separation (ΔE) of 1 ²⁺– 10 ²⁺ has been correlated to the energy difference ΔG⁰, the energy of the IVCT band E_op, and the ground‐state delocalization coefficient α². Time‐dependent (TD)DFT calculations suggest that the absorptions in the visible region of 1 ²⁺– 6 ²⁺ are mainly associated with the metal‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer transitions from both ruthenium ions and to both terminal ligands and the bridging ligand. However, the energies of these transitions vary significantly. DFT calculations have been performed on 1 ²⁺– 6 ²⁺ and 1 ³⁺– 6 ³⁺ to give information on the electronic structures and spin populations of the mixed‐valent compounds. The TDDFT‐predicted IVCT excitations reproduce well the experimental trends in transition energies. In addition, three monoruthenium complexes have been synthesized for a comparison study.