基于双耳自相关函数的车辆噪声烦恼度研究

利用主成分分析法研究车辆噪声的双耳自相关函数(ACF)因子,确定了车辆噪声的原始听感与决定其代表性听觉感知属性的主导听感,并从各类听感描述因子与基本因子的变化规律角度,分析了车辆噪声主观烦恼度的形成机制.首先,依据车辆噪声的ACF特性,对既有ACF因子理论进行了补充和完善;提出平均起伏度(EMD)与包络衰减率(ESM)...     

Laboratory studies on traffic noise annoyance

A laboratory study was undertaken to investigate the relation between traffic noise and annoyance with special reference to the number of noisy events. Students were exposed to different noise conditions for 45 and 120 minutes whereafter their reactions were assessed using a questionnaire. The extent of annoyance was found to increase with augmenting L_Aq levels but only when the number of noisy events remained equal. At equal L_Aq levels an increased extent of annoyance was found when the number of noisy events increased from 1 to 15 per hour. The results point to certain limitations in the validity of the equal energy concept and to the usefulness of laboratory studies to investigate reactions to environmental noise.     

A fuzzy rule based framework for noise annoyance modeling

Predicting the effect of noise on individual people and small groups is an extremely difficult task due to the influence of a multitude of factors that vary from person to person and from context to context. Moreover, noise annoyance is inherently a vague concept. That is why, in this paper, it is argued that noise annoyance models should identify a fuzzy set of possible effects rather than seek a very accurate crisp prediction. Fuzzy rule based models seem ideal candidates for this task. This paper provides the theoretical background for building these models. Existing empirical knowledge is used to extract a few typical rules that allow making the model more specific for small groups of individuals. The resulting model is tested on two large-scale social surveys augmented with exposure simulations. The testing demonstrates how this new way of thinking about noise effect modeling can be used in practice both in management support as a "noise annoyance adviser" and in social science for testing hypotheses such as the effect of noise sensitivity or the degree of urbanization.     

一种基于自相关函数的幂律检测器

针对水下高斯噪声中非高斯瞬态信号的检测问题,在研究Nuttall提出的power-law(幂律)检测器的基础上,为了提高其检测性能,依据信号和噪声的自相关函数的差异,提出了基于自相关函数的power-law检测器,并对其参数的最佳选取及检测性能进行了仿真研究。仿真结果表明,基于自相关函数的检测器较基于DFT的power-law检测器性能有所提高,有一定的可行性。     

An assessment of certain causal models used in surveys on aircraft noise annoyance

The causal relationships which have so far been proposed between aircraft noise exposure, annoyance and certain “psycho-social” variables (fear of aircraft crashing, general attitude towards aviation, etc.), are re-analysed, and it is demonstrated that by using correlational analysis one can arrive at contradictory results. From the sociological surveys undertaken to date, one can derive only an ordered sequence of verbal reactions to aircraft noise, and not a causal sequence between these verbal reactions: the only clear cause of annoyance is the noise itself.It is suggested that future surveys on noise annoyance should include personality tests and health questionnaires, if one wishes to establish reliable causal sequences.     

考虑噪声烦恼度的机场飞机噪声收费模型和应用研究

随着我国民航运输业的飞速发展,机场噪声影响问题日趋严重。通过向航空公司或旅客收取噪声费来进行治理,是民航发达国家的普遍做法,也是我国未来的发展方向。该文在国外机场飞机噪声收费模型的基础上,提出了基于飞机噪声特性、噪声烦恼度、噪声治理投入费用和资金回收周期等因素的机场噪声收费模型。模型将机场噪声治理费用通过合理的回收周期按一定比例分配到各年度,再根据飞机噪声特性、噪声烦恼度将每年噪声收费分配到每架次飞机(或每位旅客)。飞机噪声特性根据ACI的机场噪声分级R1～R8来确定,噪声烦恼度借助Mamdani模型构建。应用表明,该收费模型关键因素考虑全面,计算方法先进简洁,费率合理。对于噪声较高飞机,夜间起飞收费为1219.06元/架次,客均收费10.16元;对于噪声很低的飞机,昼间着陆收费为66.10元/架次,客均收费仅0.15元。费率确定符合国际民航组织倡导的以支定收原则,有助于形成航空公司/旅客减噪激励机制同时又不致抑制机场航空业务增长。     

Effect of background noise levels on community annoyance from aircraft noise

A study of community annoyance caused by exposures to civil aircraft noise was carried out in 20 sites around Gimpo and Gimhae international airports to investigate the effect of background noise in terms of dose-effect relationships between aircraft noise levels and annoyance responses under real conditions. Aircraft noise levels were mainly measured using airport noise monitoring systems, B&K type 3597. Social surveys were administered to people living within 100 m of noise measurement sites. The question relating to the annoyance of aircraft noise was answered on an 11-point numerical scale. The randomly selected respondents, who were aged between 18 and 70 years, completed the questionnaire independently. In total, 753 respondents participated in social surveys. The result shows that annoyance responses in low background noise regions are much higher than those in high background noise regions, even though aircraft noise levels are the same. It can be concluded that the background noise level is one of the important factors on the estimation of community annoyance from aircraft noise exposure.     

Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance.

Since noise was first recognized as a serious environmental pollutant, a number of social surveys have been conducted in order to assess the magnitude of the problem and to develop suitable noise ratings, such that, from a measurement of certain physical characteristics of community noise, one could reliably predict the community's subjective response to the noise. Recently, the author has reviewed the data from social surveys concerning the noise of aircraft, street traffic, expressway traffic, and railroads. Going back to the original published data, the various survey noise ratings were translated to day-night average sound level, and an independent judgment was make, where choice was possible, as to which respondents should be counted as "highly annoyed." The results of 11 of these surveys show a remarkable consistency. It is proposed that the average of these curves is the best currently available relationship for predicting community annoyance due to transportation noise of all kinds.     

Adjustment on subjective annoyance of low frequency noise by adding additional sound

Structure-borne noise originating from a heat pump unit was selected to study the influence on subjective annoyance of low frequency noise (LFN) combined with additional sound. Paired comparison test was used for evaluating the subjective annoyance of LFN combined with different sound pressure levels (SPL) of pink noise, frequency-modulated pure tones (FM pure tones) and natural sounds. The results showed that, with pink noise of 250-1000 Hz combined with the original LFN, the subjective annoyance value (SAV) first dropped then rose with increasing SPL. When SPL of the pink noise was 15-25 dB, SAV was lower than that of the original LFN. With pink noise of frequency 250-20,000 Hz added to LFN, SAV increased linearly with increasing SPL. SAV and the psychoacoustic annoyance value (PAV) obtained by semi-theoretical formulas were well correlated. The determination coefficient (R²) was 0.966 and 0.881, respectively, when the frequency range of the pink noise was 250-1000 and 250-20,000 Hz. When FM pure tones with central frequencies of 500, 2000 and 8000 Hz, or natural sounds (including the sound of singing birds, flowing water, wind or ticking clock) were, respectively, added to the original sound, the SAV increased as the SPL of the added sound increased. However, when a FM pure tone of 15 dB with a central frequency of 2000 Hz and a modulation frequency of 10 Hz was added, the SAV was lower than that of the original LFN. With SPL and central frequency held invariable, the SAV declined primarily when modulation frequency increased. With SPL and modulation frequency held invariable, the SAV became lowest when the central frequency was 2000 Hz. This showed a preferable correlation between SAV and fluctuation extent of FM pure tones.     

Road traffic noise - the relationship between noise exposure and noise annoyance in Norway

Exposure-effect relationships between the level of road traffic noise at the most exposed side of a dwelling's façade and the residents' reactions to road traffic noise have been estimated. The relationships are based on five Norwegian socio-acoustic studies featuring 18 study areas from two cities and a total of near 4000 respondents. The survey questionnaires distinguish between noise annoyance experienced right outside the apartment and when indoors. Exposure-effect relationships for all degrees of annoyance are estimated simultaneously from ordinal logit models. These predict road traffic noise annoyance when right outside the apartment and when indoors, respectively, as a function of the road traffic noise level outside the most exposed façade. Separate analyses indicate that Norwegians react stronger to road traffic noise than results from a recent compilation of socio-acoustic surveys would lead one to believe. People having inferior single glazing windows report higher indoor annoyance.     

Study of annoyance by traffic noise in Leuven (Belgium)

In order to prepare a large-scale research programme on annoyance by traffic noise in big cities—sponsored by the Belgian Ministry of Health—this preliminary survey was carried out.Comparisons are made between the results obtained and those of comparable surveys by other laboratories. Attempts are made to improve research methods and accuracy of measurement.     

Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments

General dosage-response curves typically over- or underestimate the actual prevalence of noise annoyance for specific groups of individuals. The present study applies a social psychological approach to noise annoyance that helps to understand and predict collective deflections from the curve. The approach holds that being exposed to man-made sound is more than mere exposure; it is a social experience, too: You expose Me. In effect, social aspects of the situation, like the evaluation of the sound management procedure, influence the evaluation of sound. The laboratory experiment (N=90) investigates the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance. The sound management procedure is varied systematically: Participants are promised they will listen to the sound of their choice (i.e., bird song, radio sound, or aircraft sound) but receive aircraft sound despite their expressed preference (unfair procedure), or they are simply told they will listen to aircraft sound (neutral procedure). All are exposed to aircraft sound (50 or 70 dBA Leq). A collective rise in noise annoyance is predicted in the unfair relative to the neutral procedure conditions. Results show that noise annoyance ratings are significantly higher in the unfair relative to the neutral conditions. Consequences for theory and practice are discussed.     

Effect of season and meteorological conditions on community noise annoyance

More than 80 000 residents' responses to transportation noise from 42 studies conducted at different times of year provide statistical estimates of the effects of season and meteorological conditions on community response to noise. The strongest evidence for a seasonal effect comes from 7 years of continuous daily interviewing of nationally representative probability samples in the Netherlands. Long-term annoyance with noise is slightly, but statistically significantly, higher in the summer than in the winter. Analyses of 41 other surveys drawn from diverse countries, climates, and times of year also provide evidence that noise annoyance varies over the year, is increased by temperature, and may be increased by more sunshine, less precipitation, and reduced wind speeds. These findings are not sufficiently precise to determine whether the apparent relationships with meteorological conditions are only the result of seasonal variations or are also the result of differences in the climate at different locations. There is not consistent evidence that the meteorological conditions on the day of the interview or the immediately preceding days have any more effect on long-term noise annoyance measures than do the conditions over the immediately preceding weeks or months.     

Estimating the autocorrelation function of the control process for the variance of nonstationary gaussian white noise

A model is described for nonstationary Gaussian white noise and estimators are proposed for its characteristics. Tomsk State University. Translated from Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Fizika, No. 4, pp. 45–50, April, 1997.     

城市道路交通噪声烦恼度社会调查

本文以烦恼度为主观反应指标,采用三种5级程度衡量尺度,对西安市内三条主要干道和两类典型交叉口附近区域内的道路交通噪声进行了烦恼度问卷调查。此次调查针对人口统计学因素(性别、年龄、文化程度、身体健康状况)上的个体差异与等级描述词不同的程度尺度可能对道路交通噪声烦恼度调查结果的影响,以及特定路况条件下的噪声烦恼度与不同机动车辆的行驶噪声烦恼度展开了研究。通过对调查数据的分析处理,发现并初步总结出:与选取不同的烦恼度尺度相比,人口统计学因素对调查结果的影响更加显著;人口统计学因素与特定路况条件下的噪声烦恼度及不同机动车辆的行驶噪声烦恼度无明显相关;但不同机动车辆的行驶噪声烦恼度不同,实际研究中需对摩托车噪声加以重视并区别对待。     

An experimental investigation of the noise produced by air jet impingement on flat plates

The sound power level produced by an air jet impinging upon a flat solid boundary is investigated. Measurements are recorded for nozzle diameters and exit velocities in the ranges $\text{0·75 in < D < 1·5}$ in and $\text{270 ft/s <}\text{U}\text{?}\text{< 700 ft/s}$. The effect of varying the nozzle to plate spacing is investigated for plates normal to and inclined to the jet axis.At low velocities and large nozzle diameters the sound power level was found to increase continuously as the nozzle to plate spacing decreased, the maximum increase being 7 dB above that of the free jet. Under certain conditions, usually small nozzle diameter and high velocities, a maximum in sound power level was observed in the nozzle to plate spacing range, increases of 27 dB above that of the free jet levels being recorded and a distinct tonal character being detected.The reasons for this phenomenon cannot be fully explained, but it is likely that this can be avoided by inclining the plate to the jet axis.     

Individual differences in noise annoyance and the uncomfortable loudness level

Uncomfortable loudness levels were measured for two groups of subjects with either high or low scores on a noise annoyance questionnaire. The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage scores of noise annoyance, general annoyance and locus of control were obtained from 122 respondents. Two groups of responders on the noise annoyance questionnaire attended the laboratory for the second stage involving a determination of the uncomfortable loudness level (ULL) by two methods (Békésy and analogue adjustment) and for two types of sound source (white noise and a 1 kHz tone). The key findings from the first stage were that (i) noise annoyance scores were not bimodal, showing no significant deviation from normality, (ii) females showed higher noise annoyance and (iii) both general annoyance and locus of control scales showed significant positive correlations with noise annoyance. Findings from the second stage showed that (i) Békésy determinations gave higher ULL's than those from the analogue adjustment method, (ii) based on annoyance scores, noise-annoyed subjects produced significantly higher ULL's than their less annoyed counterparts but only with the analogue determination with a 1 kHz tone, (iii) females produced markedly lower ULL's than males and (iv) deactivation, locus of control and extroversion were identified as mediating factors in the setting of the ULL. The results were further discussed in terms of methodological differences between this and earlier studies.     

Laboratory study of the influence of noise level and vehicle number on annoyance

A laboratory study has been carried out to examine the relationships between annoyance and the level of road noise made up of background noise with emergent noisy truck passages. The annoyance caused to test persons was examined in experimental situations for periods of 30 minutes. There were two independent variables: the number of truck passages varied from three to 30, and the categories of overall noise level (L_eq for road noise) were 50, 55 and 60 dB(A). Generally, the results showed that for a constant L_eq level, annoyance increases with the number of truck passages as far as a certain threshold, where it tends to stabilize; for a constant number of truck passages, the annoyance increases with the L_eq level. It is found that although the index L_eq is a better criterion of annoyance than the number of truck passages a composite index with the general form αL_eq + β log N nevertheless appears to be more reliable in predictions.     

On the annoyance caused by impulse sounds produced by small, medium-large, and large firearms

A laboratory study was designed in which the annoyance was investigated for 14 different impulse sound types produced by various firearms ranging in caliber from 7.62 to 155 mm. Sixteen subjects rated the annoyance for the simulated conditions of (1) being outdoors, and (2) being indoors with the windows closed. In the latter case, a representative outdoor-to-indoor reduction in sound level was applied. It was anticipated that the presumed additional annoyance caused by the "heaviness" of the impulse sounds might be predicted from the difference between the C-weighted sound exposure level (CSEL; LCE) and the A-weighted sound exposure level (ASEL; LAE). In the outdoor rating conditions, the annoyance was almost entirely determined by ASEL. The explained variance, r2, in the mean ratings by ASEL was 0.95. In the indoor rating conditions, however, the explained variance in the annoyance ratings by (outdoor) ASEL was significantly increased from r2 = 0.87 to r2= 0.97 by adding the product (LCE-LAE)(LAE-alpha) as a second variable. In combination with a 12-dB adjustment for small firearms, the present results showed that for the entire set of impulse sounds rated indoors with windows closed, the rating sound level, Lr, is given by Lr=LAE +12dB+beta(LCE-LAE)(LAE-alpha), with alpha=45dB and beta=0.015dB(-1). For the outdoor rating condition, the optimal parameter values were equal to alpha=57 dB and, again, beta=0.015 dB(-1). In validation studies, in which the effects of the present rating procedure will be compared to field data, it has to be determined to what extent the constants alpha and beta have to be adjusted.