Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Nitrophenols Using Supramolecular Solvent and Their Determination by HPLC with UV Detection

A novel, efficient, and environmentally friendly method—supramolecular solvent liquid–liquid microextraction (SMS-LLME) combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)—was first established for the determination of p-nitrophenol and o-nitrophenol in water samples. Several important parameters influencing extraction efficiency, such as the type and volume of extraction solvent, pH of sample, temperature, salt effect, extraction time, and stirring rate, were optimized in detail. Under the optimal conditions, the enrichment factor was 166 for p-nitrophenol and 160 for o-nitrophenol, and the limits of detection by HPLC were 0.26 and 0.58 μg L^?1, respectively. Excellent linearity with coefficients of correlation from 0.9996 to 0.9997 was observed in the concentration range of 2–1,000 μg L^?1. The ranges of intra- and interday precision (n = 5) at 100 μg L^?1 of nitrophenols were 5.85–7.76 and 10.2–11.9 %, respectively. The SMS-LLME method was successfully applied for preconcentration of nitrophenols in environmental water samples.     

Use of the Mass Spectrum–Compound Fragment Composition Database in the Determination of the Structure of Organic Compounds

A mass spectral database in which structural formulas are presented as nonisomorphic connected k-vertex fragments (2 k 7) is used for identifying the structure of organic compounds. It is shown with the example of a test sample of 13000 mass spectra of various organic compounds that up to half the fragments of an unknown analyte can be identified in 50% of cases. Relationships between the correctly and erroneously identified data are given.     

Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Nitrophenols Using Supramolecular Solvent and Their Determination by HPLC with UV Detection

A novel, efficient, and environmentally friendly method—supramolecular solvent liquid–liquid microextraction (SMS-LLME) combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)—was first established for the determination of p-nitrophenol and o-nitrophenol in water samples. Several important parameters influencing extraction efficiency, such as the type and volume of extraction solvent, pH of sample, temperature, salt effect, extraction time, and stirring rate, were optimized in detail. Under the optimal conditions, the enrichment factor was 166 for p-nitrophenol and 160 for o-nitrophenol, and the limits of detection by HPLC were 0.26 and 0.58 μg L⁻¹, respectively. Excellent linearity with coefficients of correlation from 0.9996 to 0.9997 was observed in the concentration range of 2–1,000 μg L⁻¹. The ranges of intra- and interday precision (n = 5) at 100 μg L⁻¹ of nitrophenols were 5.85–7.76 and 10.2–11.9 %, respectively. The SMS-LLME method was successfully applied for preconcentration of nitrophenols in environmental water samples.

     

Heterogeneous Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Biohybrid Catalysts for Cascade Reactions in Organic Solvent

In cooperative catalysis, the combination of chemo- and biocatalysts to perform one-pot reactions is a powerful tool for the improvement of chemical synthesis. Herein, UiO-66-NH₂ was employed to stepwise immobilize Pd nanoparticles (NPs) and Candida antarctica lipase B (CalB) for the fabrication of biohybrid catalysts for cascade reactions. Distinct from traditional materials, UiO-66-NH₂ has a robust but tunable structure that can be utilized with a ligand exchange approach to adjust its hydrophobicity, resulting in excellent catalyst dispersity in diverse reaction media. These attractive properties contribute to the formation of MOF-based biohybrid catalysts with high activity and selectivity in the synthesis of benzyl hexanoate from benzaldehyde and ethyl hexanoate. With this proof-of-concept, we reasonably expect that future tailor-made MOFs can combine other catalysts, ranging from chemical to biological catalysts for applications in industry.     

Liquid–Liquid Extraction of Organic Compounds into a Single Drop of the Extractant: Overview of Reviews

Single-drop microextraction (SDME) and hollow-fiber membrane microextraction (HFME) belong to methods of the liquid-phase microextraction preconcentration of organic compounds. These methods are characterized by the low consumption of organic solvents, high preconcentration factors, simplicity, low cost, ease of combination with various chromatographic methods; processes of preconcentration and sample injection are combined in a single device. Since the emergence of SDME (1996) and HFME (1999), a large number of versions have been developed that differ in the preconcentration technique, nature of the extractants used, and combinations with methods for the subsequent determination of the preconcentrated substances. The popularity of these methods among the analysts is evidenced by many reviews that we have summarized in this publication.

     

Interactions in the Protein–Zinc Salt–Organic Tanning Agent System

Russian Journal of General Chemistry - The suitability of a combined tanning system comprising zinc salts and an organic tanning agent as an alternative to chromium compounds was considered. The...     

Determination of Organic Compounds in Aqueous–Organic and Dispersed Media Using Electrochemical Methods of Analysis

Journal of Analytical Chemistry - We considered capabilities of electrochemical analysis for the determination of organic compounds in aqueous-organic and dispersed media. The main factors...     

Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Coupled with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Determination of Coumarin Compounds in Radix Angelicae Dahuricae

In this paper, two methods, organic solvent dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (OS-DLLME) and ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL-DLLME), coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography have been critically compared and introduced for the analysis of the eight coumarin compounds (psoralen, isopsoralen, bergapten, isobergapten, oxypeucedanin, imperatorin, osthole, and isoimperatorin) in Radix Angelicae Dahuricae samples. Experimental conditions have been investigated for both OS-DLLME and IL-DLLME. Under optimal conditions, the detection limits of the eight coumarin compounds obtained by OS-DLLME and IL-DLLME ranged between 0.002–0.026 ng mL⁻¹ and 0.013–0.66 ng mL⁻¹, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs, n = 9) were lower than 8.7 and 8.4% with enrichment factors in the range of 145–380 and 130–230 folds for OS-DLLME and IL-DLLME, respectively. The results showed that there were no significant deviations between the two DLLME methods for the determination of the eight coumarin compounds. Both methods were simple, fast, efficient, and inexpensive. However, compared with IL-DLLME, the OS-DLLME technique exhibited a higher extraction capacity for the eight target analytes.

     

Solvent and Structural Effects on the Photoreduction of Cobalt(III)-Aryl Amine Complexes in Water–Organic Solvent Media*

Photoreduction of [Co(En)₂Cl(RC₆H₄NH₂)]²⁺ ions (where R = p-OMe, p-OEt, p-Me, m-Me, H, p-F, and m-OMe) in varying compositions of water–methanol and water–1,4-dioxane mixtures containing 15–40% (vol.) of organic co-solvent is carried out. Ultraviolet excitation of the above complexes in air-equilibrated solutions causes bleaching of its intense LMCT excited states with concurrent production of Co²⁺ion. As seen from the quantum yield data, _Co(II) increases smoothly with increasing content of organic co-solvent in the binary mixtures. The observed values indicate that the metal center is reduced by both ligands and solvent. The quantum yield _Co(II) is considerably affected by the substituent R of the amine, RC₆H₄NH₂ ligand. The effects of solvent and substituted ligands on the _Co(II) are estimated quantitatively using linear regression and multiple correlation methods. The former analysis was carried out using Grunwald–Winstein (Y) Gutmann donor number (DN ^N) and Krygowski–Fawcett E ^N _T (solvent empirical parameters). In addition, Kamlet–Taft's , , and * solvatochromic parameters were also used to study the effect of solute–solvent interaction. The effect of substitution on the aromatic amine ligand affects the quantum yield values, which was established using Hammett's substituent constant . Extensive tabulations of percentage contributions of these parameters, calculated using methods reported earlier, provide suitable values which are presumed to explain the quantitative effects of solvent and structural changes in the aromatic ligand on photoreduction of the cobalt(III) complexes.     

Comparison of Air-Assisted,Vortex-Assisted and Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Determination of BTEX Compounds in Water Samples Prior to GC-FID Analysis

Three new dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods, air-assisted (AA-DLLME), vortex-assisted (VA-DLLME) and ultrasound-assisted (UA-DLLME), were compared from the point of view of their analytical application for preconcentration of trace amounts of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene isomers (BTEX) in water samples. In all of these methods, no dispersive solvent is required and dispersion of extractant is carried out by air bubbles, vortex and ultrasound for AA-DLLEM, VA-DLLME, and UA-DLLME, respectively. Advantages and disadvantages of these three liquid phase microextraction methods and their capability in dispersion of a similar extractant phase in sample solutions were comprehensively compared. All other extraction parameters, which have an influence on the microextraction, were also investigated and optimized. Under optimized conditions, analytical figures of merit for the three techniques were determined and compared. It was found that the limit of detection of the three methods is almost the same, while AA-DLLME has a wider linear dynamic range and the shortest analysis time. Enrichment factors of 182, 45 and 245 were achieved for AA-DLLEM, VA-DLLME, and UA-DLLME, respectively.     

Comparison of Liquid–Liquid Extraction,Simultaneous Distillation Extraction,Ultrasound-Assisted Solvent Extraction,and Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction for the Determination of Volatile Compounds in Jujube Extract by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

Jujube extract has a unique flavor that has been used as a common fragrance due to the volatile compounds. In this study, the volatiles of jujube extract were isolated by liquid–liquid extraction, simultaneous distillation extraction, ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction, and headspace solid-phase microextraction, and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Altogether 92 compounds were identified by the four methods, of which 53 components were identified for the first time; however, only 21 compounds were identified by all these methods. The performance characteristics of the four pretreatment techniques were compared by principal component analysis which showed that the volatile compounds obtained by liquid–liquid extraction and ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction were similar both in categories and in content; whereas, the volatiles extracted by simultaneous distillation extraction, ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction, and headspace solid-phase microextraction greatly varied. The results indicated that a multi-pretreatment technique should be adopted in order to obtain the most complete information about the volatile compounds in jujube extract. The ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction method exhibited excellent repeatability and recoveries, and was very suitable for quantitative analysis. Although the recoveries and reproducibility of headspace solid-phase microextraction were inferior to the other methods, it was more sensitive than other methods.     

Determination of Iron in Tap and Waste Water Using Liquid–Liquid Extraction in a Flow-Injection System

A flow-injection procedure for the determination of iron(III) in water is described. The procedure is based on the formation of an ion pair between the tetraphenylarsonium (Ph₄As⁺) (TPA) or tetrabutylammonium (But₄N⁺) (TBA) cations and the tetrathiocyanatoferrate(III) complex (TTF). This ion pair is extracted with chloroform, and the absorbance of the organic phase is measured at 503nm (for Ph₄As⁺) or 475nm (for But₄N⁺). Iron concentrations higher than 0.9×10^–6molL^–1 (50µgL^–1) can be detected in the first case, with a relative standard deviation of 1.9% (n=12), a linear application rangeof between 1.34 and 54.0×10^–6molL^–1 (75–3015µgL^–1), and a sampling frequency of 30h^–1. For the ion pair with But₄N⁺, the detection limit is 0.52×10^–6molL^–1 (29µgL^–1), with a relative standard deviation of 1.6% and a linear application range between 0.73 and 54.0×10^–6molL^–1. Under the proposed working conditions, only Pd(IV), Cu(II) and Bi(III) interfere. With the application of the merging zones technique, considerable amounts of organic reagent can be saved. The TBA method was applied to the analysis of iron(III) in tap and industrial waste waters.     

Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Extraction Based on Freezing of the Organic Drop, Followed by GC for the Determination of Methyl Methacrylate in Wastewater

Crude oil reservoirs typically contain more water than oil, which is emulsified with the oil. During oil production, the emulsion is broken with demulsifiers. Most recently, based on methyl methacrylate, after which, the water, containing the methyl methacrylate, is discharged into surface waters. Significant health hazards have been associated with methyl methacrylate, and a limit of 30 ppm in ground waters has been established. This paper describes the preconcentration of methyl methacrylate from the separated water, using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, followed by freezing of the organic drop in an ice bath which facilitated separation of the phases (by centrifugation). In the optimized method, 15.0 μL of 2-dodecanol was rapidly injected into 5 mL water samples, followed by stirring, freezing, and decantation, then direct injection into the gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. The method was optimized for: choice of extraction solvent, volume of extraction solvent, pH, ionic strength, temperature and extraction time.