Semi-hyper-connected vertex transitive graphs

A graph G is said to be semi-hyper-connected if the removal of every minimum cut of G creates exactly two connected components. In this paper, we characterize semi-hyper-connected vertex transitive graphs, in particular Cayley graphs.     

Super-Connectivity and Hyper-Connectivity of Vertex Transitive Bipartite Graphs

A graph is said to be super-connected if every minimum vertex cut isolates a vertex. A graph is said to be hyper-connected if the deletion of each minimum vertex cut creates exactly two components, one of which is an isolated vertex. In this note, we proved that a vertex transitive bipartite graph is not super-connected if and only if it is isomorphic to the lexicographic product of a cycle C_n(n ≥ 6) by a null graph N_m. We also characterized non-hyper-connected vertex transitive bipartite graphs.     

上连通和超连通的三次Bi-Cayley图

Let G be a finite group and let S(possibly, contains the identity element) be a subset of G. The Bi-Cayley graph BC(G, S) is a bipartite graph with vertex set G×{0, 1} and edge set {(g, 0) (sg, 1) : g∈G, s ∈ S}. A graph is said to be super-connected if every minimum vertex cut isolates a vertex. A graph is said to be hyper-connected if every minimum vertex cut creates two components, one of which is an isolated vertex. In this paper, super-connected and/or hyper-connected cubic Bi-Cayley graphs are characterized.     

Superconnected and Hyperconnected Small Degree Transitive Graphs

A graph is said to be superconnected if every minimum vertex cut isolates a vertex. A graph is said to be hyperconnected if each minimum vertex cut creates exactly two components, one of which is an isolated vertex. In this paper, we characterize superconnected or hyperconnected vertex transitive graphs with degree 4 and 5. As a corollary, superconnected or hyperconnected planar transitive graphs are characterized.     

Total domination critical and stable graphs upon edge removal

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination edge critical if the removal of any arbitrary edge increases the total domination number. On the other hand, a graph is total domination edge stable if the removal of any arbitrary edge has no effect on the total domination number. In this paper, we characterize total domination edge critical graphs. We also investigate various properties of total domination edge stable graphs.     

Total domination changing and stable graphs upon vertex removal

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination vertex removal stable if the removal of an arbitrary vertex leaves the total domination number unchanged. On the other hand, a graph is total domination vertex removal changing if the removal of an arbitrary vertex changes the total domination number. In this paper, we study total domination vertex removal changing and stable graphs.     

On the number of components in 2-factors of claw-free graphs

In this paper, we prove that if a claw-free graph G with minimum degree δ?4 has no maximal clique of two vertices, then G has a 2-factor with at most (|G|-1)/4 components. This upper bound is best possible. Additionally, we give a family of claw-free graphs with minimum degree δ?4 in which every 2-factor contains more than n/δ components.     

On 3-restricted edge connectivity of undirected binary Kautz graphs

An edge cut of a connected graph is m-restricted if its removal leaves every component having order at least m. The size of minimum m-restricted edge cuts of a graph G is called its m-restricted edge connectivity. It is known that when m≤4, networks with maximal m-restricted edge connectivity are most locally reliable. The undirected binary Kautz graph UK(2,n) is proved to be maximal 2- and 3-restricted edge connected when n≥3 in this work. Furthermore, every minimum 2-restricted edge cut disconnects this graph into two components, one of which being an isolated edge.     

Planar unit-distance graphs having planar unit-distance complement

A graph G=(V,E) is called a unit-distance graph in the plane if there is an embedding of V into the plane such that every pair of adjacent vertices are at unit distance apart. If an embedding of V satisfies the condition that two vertices are adjacent if and only if they are at unit distance apart, then G is called a strict unit-distance graph in the plane. A graph G is a (strict) co-unit-distance graph, if both G and its complement are (strict) unit-distance graphs in the plane. We show by an exhaustive enumeration that there are exactly 69 co-unit-distance graphs (65 are strict co-unit-distance graphs), 55 of which are connected (51 are connected strict co-unit-distance graphs), and seven are self-complementary.     

上连通和超连通三次点传递图(英)

图G称为上连通的,若对每个最小割集C,G-C有孤立点.G称为超连通的,若对每个最小割集G,G-C恰有两个连通分支,且其中之一为孤立点.本文刻划了上连通和超连通三次点传递图.     

上连通和超连通三次点传递图

图G称为上连通的,若对每个最小割集C,G-C有孤立点,G称为超连通的,若对每个最小割集C,G-C恰有两个连通分支,且其中之一为弧立点,本文刻划了上连通和超连通三次点传递图。     

On Integral Sum Graphs

A graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its nodes can be given a labeling f with distinct integers, so that for any two distinct nodes u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v) = f(w) for some node w in G. A node of G is called a saturated node if it is adjacent to every other node of G. We show that any integral sum graph which is not K₃ has at most two saturated nodes. We determine the structure for all integral sum graphs with exactly two saturated nodes, and give an upper bound for the number of edges of a connected integral sum graph with no saturated nodes. We introduce a method of identification on constructing new connected integral sum graphs from given integral sum graphs with a saturated node. Moreover, we show that every graph is an induced subgraph of a connected integral sum graph. Miscellaneous relative results are also presented.     

On integral sum graphs

A graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its nodes can be given a labeling f with distinct integers, so that for any two distinct nodes u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v)=f(w) for some node w in G. A node of G is called a saturated node if it is adjacent to every other node of G. We show that any integral sum graph which is not K₃ has at most two saturated nodes. We determine the structure for all integral sum graphs with exactly two saturated nodes, and give an upper bound for the number of edges of a connected integral sum graph with no saturated nodes. We introduce a method of identification on constructing new connected integral sum graphs from given integral sum graphs with a saturated node. Moreover, we show that every graph is an induced subgraph of a connected integral sum graph. Miscellaneous related results are also presented.     

Graphoidal bipartite graphs

A graphoidal cover of a graph G is a collection ψ of (not necessarily open) paths inG such that every path in ψ has at least two vertices, every vertex ofG is an internal vertex of at most one path in ψ and every edge of G is in exactly one path in ψ. Let Ω (ψ) denote the intersection graph of ψ. A graph G is said to be graphoidal if there exists a graphH and a graphoidal cover ψof H such that G is isomorphic to Ω(ψ). In this paper we study the properties of graphoidal graphs and obtain a forbidden subgraph characterisation of bipartite graphoidal graphs.     

Star-Uniform Graphs

A star-factor of a graph is a spanning subgraph each of whose components is a star. A graph G is called star-uniform if all star-factors of G have the same number of components. Motivated by the minimum cost spanning tree and the optimal assignment problems, Hartnell and Rall posed an open problem to characterize all the star-uniform graphs. In this paper, we show that a graph G is star-uniform if and only if G has equal domination and matching number. From this point of view, the star-uniform graphs were characterized by Randerath and Volkmann. Unfortunately, their characterization is incomplete. By deploying Gallai–Edmonds Matching Structure Theorem, we give a clear and complete characterization of star-unform graphs.     

Path factors and parallel knock-out schemes of almost claw-free graphs

An H₁,{H₂}-factor of a graph G is a spanning subgraph of G with exactly one component isomorphic to the graph H₁ and all other components (if there are any) isomorphic to the graph H₂. We completely characterise the class of connected almost claw-free graphs that have a P₇,{P₂}-factor, where P₇ and P₂ denote the paths on seven and two vertices, respectively. We apply this result to parallel knock-out schemes for almost claw-free graphs. These schemes proceed in rounds in each of which each surviving vertex eliminates one of its surviving neighbours. A graph is reducible if such a scheme eliminates every vertex in the graph. Using our characterisation, we are able to classify all reducible almost claw-free graphs, and we can show that every reducible almost claw-free graph is reducible in at most two rounds. This leads to a quadratic time algorithm for determining if an almost claw-free graph is reducible (which is a generalisation and improvement upon the previous strongest result that showed that there was a O(n^5.376) time algorithm for claw-free graphs on n vertices).     

Diameter-sufficient conditions for a graph to be super-restricted connected

A vertex-cut X is said to be a restricted cut of a graph G if it is a vertex-cut such that no vertex u in G has all its neighbors in X. Clearly, each connected component of G−X must have at least two vertices. The restricted connectivity κ^′(G) of a connected graph G is defined as the minimum cardinality of a restricted cut. Additionally, if the deletion of a minimum restricted cut isolates one edge, then the graph is said to be super-restricted connected. In this paper, several sufficient conditions yielding super-restricted-connected graphs are given in terms of the girth and the diameter. The corresponding problem for super-edge-restricted-connected graph is also studied.     

Partial characterizations of clique-perfect graphs I: Subclasses of claw-free graphs

A clique-transversal of a graph G is a subset of vertices that meets all the cliques of G. A clique-independent set is a collection of pairwise vertex-disjoint cliques. The clique-transversal number and clique-independence number of G are the sizes of a minimum clique-transversal and a maximum clique-independent set of G, respectively. A graph G is clique-perfect if these two numbers are equal for every induced subgraph of G. The list of minimal forbidden induced subgraphs for the class of clique-perfect graphs is not known. In this paper, we present a partial result in this direction; that is, we characterize clique-perfect graphs by a restricted list of forbidden induced subgraphs when the graph belongs to two different subclasses of claw-free graphs.     

On the 3-restricted edge connectivity of permutation graphs

An edge cut W of a connected graph G is a k-restricted edge cut if G−W is disconnected, and every component of G−W has at least k vertices. The k-restricted edge connectivity is defined as the minimum cardinality over all k-restricted edge cuts. A permutation graph is obtained by taking two disjoint copies of a graph and adding a perfect matching between the two copies. The k-restricted edge connectivity of a permutation graph is upper bounded by the so-called minimum k-edge degree. In this paper some sufficient conditions guaranteeing optimal k-restricted edge connectivity and super k-restricted edge connectivity for permutation graphs are presented for k=2,3.     

Some remarks on the geodetic number of a graph

A set of vertices D of a graph G is geodetic if every vertex of G lies on a shortest path between two not necessarily distinct vertices in D. The geodetic number of G is the minimum cardinality of a geodetic set of G.We prove that it is NP-complete to decide for a given chordal or chordal bipartite graph G and a given integer k whether G has a geodetic set of cardinality at most k. Furthermore, we prove an upper bound on the geodetic number of graphs without short cycles and study the geodetic number of cographs, split graphs, and unit interval graphs.