3‐(4‐Acetyl­phenyl)‐1‐(4‐nitro­phenyl)­triazene

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₃, shows that the stereochemistry about the N=N double bond of the N=N—N(H) moiety is trans. The whole mol­ecule is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0654 Å), the interplanar angle between the phenyl rings being 0.7 (1)° and the largest interplanar angle being that between the phenyl ring and the nitro group of the 4‐nitro­phenyl substituent [11.5 (2)°]. Intermolecular N—H⋯O interactions between mol­ecules related by translation give rise to chains along the [110] and [10] directions, and these chains are held together by N⋯O π–π interactions. An unequal distribution of the double‐bond character among the N atoms suggests a delocalization of π electrons over the diazo­amine group and the adjacent aryl substituents.     

Crystallographic report: 1,1‐Diphenyl‐3‐(triphenylgermyl)‐3‐(4‐chlorophenyl) propanol

The germanium atom in [(C₆H₅)₃GeCH(4‐ClC₆H₄)CH₂C(C₆H₅)₂OH] is in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. Steric hindrance precludes O? H···O intra‐ or inter‐molecular bonding. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Determination of a novel phosphodiesterase4 inhibitor, 3‐[1‐(3cyclopropylmethoxy‐4‐difluoromethoxybenzyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl]‐benzoic acid (PDE‐423) in rat plasma using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

A method for determining a novel phosphodiesterase‐4 inhibitor, 3‐[1‐(3cyclopropylmethoxy‐4‐difluoromethoxybenzyl)‐1H‐pyrazol‐3‐yl]‐benzoic acid (PDE‐423), in rat plasma was developed and validated using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for further pharmacokinetic study for development as a novel anti‐asthmatic drug. PDE‐423 in the concentration range of 0.02–10 µg/mL was linear with a correlation coefficient of >0.99, and the mean intra‐ and inter‐assay precisions of the assay were 7.50 and 3.86%, respectively. The validated method was used successfully for a pharmacokinetic study of PDE‐423 in rats. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

3‐(4‐Chloro­benzoyl)‐7‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)‐1‐phenyl­indolizine and 3‐(2,4‐di­chloro­benzoyl)‐7‐(N,N‐di­methyl­amino)‐1‐phenyl­indolizine

In both of the title compounds, C₂₃H₁₉ClN₂O, (I), and C₂₃H₁₈Cl₂N₂O, (II), the molecular packing is influenced by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions, but despite the chemical similarity of the compounds, the packing in (II) is entirely different from that observed in (I).     

Ethyl 2‐form­amido‐2‐(4‐iodo­benzyl)‐3‐(4‐iodo­phenyl)­propionate and ethyl 2‐(3‐bromo­benzyl)‐3‐(3‐bromo­phenyl)‐2‐form­amidopropionate

The title compounds, C₁₉H₁₉I₂NO₃ and C₁₉H₁₉Br₂NO₃, are derivatives of α‐amino­isobutyric acid with halogen substituents at the para and meta positions, respectively. The ethoxycarbonyl and formamide side chains attached to the C_α atom of the mol­ecule adopt extended and folded conformations, respectively. The crystal structures are stabilized by N—H⃛O, C—H⃛O, C—Br⃛O and C—I⃛O interactions.     

1,3‐Bis(4‐methyl­phen­yl)triazene, 1‐(4‐chloro­phen­yl)‐3‐(4‐fluoro­phen­yl)triazene and 1‐(4‐fluoro­phen­yl)‐3‐(4‐methyl­phen­yl)triazene

The title 4,4′‐disubstituted diphen­yl‐1,3‐triazines, C₁₄H₁₅N₃, (I), C₁₂H₉ClFN₃, (II), and C₁₃H₁₂FN₃, (III), each contain a triazene group (–N=N—NH–) having an extended conformation. The dihedral angles between the two benzene rings in (I), (II) and (III) are 4.3, 3.4 and 6.5°, respectively. The mol­ecules are almost entirely planar, with maximum deviations from the mean planes of 0.1087 (2), −0.1072 (7) and 0.1401 (3) Å, respectively. In each compound, the molecules are linked by N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds to form chains and pack similarly in the crystal structures.     

Enantioselective determination of 1‐[4‐(2‐methoxyethyl)phenoxy]‐3‐[2‐(2‐methoxyphenoxy)ethylamino]‐2‐propanol hydrochloride,a novel antihypertensive agent,in rat plasma and tissues by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Enantioselective biodistribution studies of 1‐[4‐(2‐methoxyethyl)phenoxy]‐3‐[2‐(2‐methoxyphenoxy)ethylamino]‐2‐propanol hydrochloride (TJ0711), a novel antihypertensive agent, require the accurate and precise quantification of each TJ0711 enantiomer in biological fluids and tissues. Here we report a simple and sensitive liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of (R )‐TJ0711 and (S )‐TJ0711 in rat plasma and tissue samples using protein precipitation. The influence of column type, temperature, mobile phase composition, and flow rate on the retention and enantioselectivity was evaluated. The separation of the TJ0711 enantiomers was ultimately achieved on a SUMICHIRAL OA‐2500 column in 15 min using isocratic elution with ethanol/hexane (40:60) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Good linearities of spiked analyte concentration from 5 to 2000 ng/mL were achieved and the correlation coefficients (R ) were greater than 0.99. The intra‐ and inter‐day accuracy and precision for both analytes were <15% at all concentration levels, and the extraction recoveries were consistent among the five quality control concentrations. This assay was successfully applied to quantify plasma and tissue concentrations of TJ0711 enantiomers in a preclinical study.     

4‐(4‐Chloro­phen­yl)‐3‐(4‐phenyl­pent‐4‐en­yloxy)‐1,3‐thia­zole‐2(3H)‐thione

The title compound, C₂₀H₁₈ClNOS₂, is a thia­zole‐derived thio­hydroxamic acid O‐ester. The value of Z′ is 3 and the asymmetric unit comprises three mol­ecules of identical helicity along the N—O bond. Two of these show an anti and the third a syn arrangement of substituents attached in positions 3 and 4 to the 1,3‐thia­zole nucleus.     

Heterobimetallic Complexes: Substitution Effects in the [Tetracarbonylrhodiumbis{μ‐(diphenylphosphino)}{μ‐(η:η2‐(4‐diphenylphosphino‐κP)‐2‐methyl‐oxobutyl)}molybdenum](Mo‐Rh) System

Syntheses of the array of heterobimetallic complexes [(OC)₃M(μ‐PPh₂)₂(μ‐O‐C(CHMe(CH₂)₂PPh₂)RhL], M = Cr, Mo, W, L = ^tBuNC, are described, extending the previous study of the counterpart array for L = CO. A single crystal X‐ray structure determination is reported for the M = Mo adduct, enabling comparison with its previously reported L = CO counterpart, for which an improved redetermination is also reported. In the present complex the ^tBuNC ligand is found to be much more weakly bound (Rh‐C 2.026(5) Å) than the carbonyl group it displaces (Rh‐C 1.945(2) Å) with concomitant minor impact on the remainder of the rhodium ambience.     

The dimeric mixed‐ligand titana­carborane sandwich [1‐(Cp)‐1‐Ti‐2‐(Me)‐3‐(SiMe3)‐2,3‐C2B4H4]2

The title dimer, bis­[1‐cyclo­penta­dienyl‐2‐methyl‐1‐titana‐3‐tri­methylsilyl‐2,3‐dicarba‐closo‐hexaborane(6)], [Ti(C₅H₅)(C₆­H₁₆­B₄Si)]₂, reveals that the centrosymmetric mol­ecule consists of two bent‐sandwich titanacarboranes bridged by the B—H—Ti bonds. The average bond distances are Ti—B 2.445 (3), Ti—C(cage) 2.334 (2) and Ti—C(Cp) 2.376 (3) Å, and the corresponding bond angles are Cp—Ti—Cp 163.2 (1) and Cp—Ti—Cb (Cb = C₂B₃ face) 139.9 (1)°; the Ti—H separations are 2.10 (2) and 2.19 (2) Å.     

2‐(3‐tert‐Butyldimethylsiloxy‐4‐methoxyphenyl)‐6‐methoxy‐3‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzoyl)indole

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C₃₂H₃₉NO₇Si, all geometric parameters fall within experimental error of expected values. The analysis of molecular‐packing plots reveals an infinite two‐dimensional linear array running parallel to the b axis, formed by one N—H?O intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interaction. Several potential C—H?O interactions are also present.     

Synthesis of all‐conjugated poly(3‐hexylthiophene)‐block‐ poly(3‐(4′‐(3″,7″‐dimethyloctyloxy)‐3′‐pyridinyl)thiophene) and its blend for photovoltaic applications

New all‐conjugated block copolythiophene, poly(3‐hexylthiophene)‐block‐poly(3‐(4′‐(3″,7″‐dimethyloctyloxy)‐3′‐pyridinyl)thiophene) (P3HT‐b‐P3PyT) was successfully prepared by Grignard metathesis polymerization. The supramolecular interaction between [6,6]‐phenyl‐C₆₁‐butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) and P3PyT was proposed to control the aggregated size of PCBM and long‐term thermal stability of the photovoltaic cell, as evidenced by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and optical microscopy. The effect of different solvents on the electronic and optoelectronic properties was studied, including chloroform (CL), dichlorobenzene (DCB), and mixed solvent of CL/DCB. The optimized bulk heterojunction solar cell devices using the P3HT‐b‐P3PyT/PCBM blend showed a power conversion efficiency of 2.12%, comparable to that of P3HT/PCBM device despite the fact that former had a lower crystallinity or absorption coefficient. Furthermore, P3HT‐b‐P3PyT could be also used as a surfactant to enhance the long‐term thermal stability of P3HT/PCBM‐based solar cells by limiting the aggregated size of PCBM. This study represents a new supramolecular approach to design all‐conjugated block copolymers for high‐performance photovoltaic devices. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011.     

Dimerization of ionized 4‐(methyl mercapto)‐phenol during ESI,APCI and APPI mass spectrometry

A novel ion/molecule reaction was observed to occur under electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), and atmospheric pressure photo ionization (APPI) conditions, leading to dimerization of ionized 4‐(methyl mercapto)‐phenol followed by fast H^· loss. The reaction is particularly favored during ESI, which suggests that this ion/molecule reaction can occur both in the solution inside the ESI‐charged droplets and in the gas‐phase environment of most other atmospheric pressure ionization techniques. The dimerization reaction is inherent to the electrolytic process during ESI, whereas it is more by ion/molecule chemistry in nature during APCI and APPI. From the tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data, accurate mass measurements, hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, two methyl sulfonium ions appear to be the most likely products of this electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction. The possible occurrence of this unexpected reaction complicates mass spectral data interpretation and can be misleading in terms of structural assignment as reported herein for 4‐(methyl mercapto)‐phenol. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

N‐(3‐Phenoxy‐4‐pyridinio)methanesulfonamidate

The title compound, C₁₂H₁₂N₂O₃S, is a strict pyridine analogue of nimesulide, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygen­ase‐2. The structure is characterized by a pyridinium ring with a deprotonated sulfon­amide group. An intermolecular charge‐assisted hydrogen bond between these two groups is observed within the crystal packing, linking the mol­ecules into an infinite chain running along the b‐axis direction.     

Gas‐phase fragmentation of γ‐lactone derivatives by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Fragmentation reactions of β‐hydroxymethyl‐, β‐acetoxymethyl‐ and β‐benzyloxymethyl‐butenolides and the corresponding γ‐butyrolactones were investigated by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS/MS) using collision‐induced dissociation (CID). This study revealed that loss of H₂O [M + H ?18]⁺ is the main fragmentation process for β‐hydroxymethylbutenolide (1) and β‐hydroxymethyl‐γ‐butyrolactone (2). Loss of ketene ([M + H ?42]⁺) is the major fragmentation process for protonated β‐acetoxymethyl‐γ‐butyrolactone (4), but not for β‐acetoxymethylbutenolide (3). The benzyl cation (m/z 91) is the major ion in the ESI‐MS/MS spectra of β‐benzyloxymethylbutenolide (5) and β‐benzyloxymethyl‐γ‐butyrolactone (6). The different side chain at the β‐position and the double bond presence afforded some product ions that can be important for the structural identification of each compound. The energetic aspects involved in the protonation and gas‐phase fragmentation processes were interpreted on the basis of thermochemical data obtained by computational quantum chemistry. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

N‐(4‐Cyano­phenyl)‐α‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­nitro­ne

In the crystal structure of the title compound, 4‐cyano‐N‐(4‐methoxy­benzyl­idene)­phenyl­amine N‐oxide, C₁₅H₁₂N₂O₂, the 4‐methoxy­phenyl is approximately coplanar with the nitrone moiety but significantly rotated with respect to the 4‐cyano­phenyl moiety. The extent of this rotation is significantly different for the two crystallographically independent mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit [dihedral angles of 19.4 (1) and 26.5 (1)°]. The geometry about the C=N bond is Z. The two mol­ecules are related to one another by a pseudo inversion centre.