Kinetics and Mechanism of the Reaction of a Ruthenium(VI) Nitrido Complex with HSO3− and SO32− in Aqueous Solution

The kinetics and mechanism of the reaction of S^IV (SO₃^2?+HSO₃^?) with a ruthenium(VI) nitrido complex, [(L)Ru^VI(N)(OH₂)]⁺ (Ru^VIN, L=N,N′‐bis(salicylidene)‐o‐cyclohexyldiamine dianion), in aqueous acidic solutions are reported. The kinetic results are consistent with parallel pathways involving oxidation of HSO₃^? and SO₃^2? by Ru^VIN. A deuterium isotope effect of 4.7 is observed in the HSO₃^? pathway. Based on experimental results and DFT calculations the proposed mechanism involves concerted N?S bond formation (partial N‐atom transfer) between Ru^VIN and HSO₃^? and H⁺ transfer from HSO₃^? to a H₂O molecule.     

Oxidation of captopril by hydrogen peroxide and peroxomonosulfate ion catalyzed by a ruthenium(III) complex: kinetic and mechanistic studies

The complex [Ru^III(edta)(H₂O)]^? (edta^4? = ethylenediaminetetraacetate) catalyzes the oxidation of captopril (CapSH) using primary oxidants, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and peroxomonosulfate (\( {\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - } \)). The kinetics of the oxidation reaction were studied as a function of both oxidant (H₂O₂, \( {\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - } \)) and substrate (CapSH) concentrations using stopped-flow and rapid scan stopped-flow techniques. Spectral and kinetic data are suggestive of a pathway involving rapid formation of the intermediate complex [Ru^III(edta)(CapS)]^2? followed by direct attack of the oxidant (H₂O₂ or \( {\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - } \)) at the S atom of the coordinated CapS^?. ESI–MS and HPLC analysis of the reaction products showed that captopril disulfide (CapSSCap) is the major oxidation product. A probable mechanism in agreement with the spectral and kinetic data is presented.     

REDOX AND pH-INDUCED SWITCHING OF THE COORDINATION SITES IN THE 3-HYDROXYPICOLINATE RUTHENIUM(III)-edta COMPLEX

Abstract

Ruthenium(III)-edta reacts with the 3-hydroxypicolinate ligand (Hhpic^?) at pH 5, yielding the practically colorless [Ru^III(edta)(κN, κO-Hhpic)]^2? complex (H₂hpic = 3-hydroxypicolinic acid; H₄edta = ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid). Above pH 9, deprotonation of the phenolic group promotes an intramolecular linkage isomerization process, generating the faint red [Ru^III(edta) (κO, κO-hpic)]^3? complex. Both isomers can be electrochemically reduced, converting into a single deep red [Ru^II(edta)(κN, κO-Hhpic)]^3? complex strongly stabilized by ruthenium-to-pyridinecarboxylate d _π → p*_π charge-transfer interactions. The observed distinct binding properties as a function of the oxidation states and pH have been rationalized based on semiempirical theoretical calculations for the complexes.     

Preparation and electrochemical behavior of dimeric complexes of Ru2(III12, III12) and Ru2(IV,IV) formed by oxidative dimerization of [RuIII(edta)OH2]−

Electrochemical or chemical oxidation of [Ru^III(edta)OH₂]^? proceeds in successive half- and one-electron steps to yield dimeric complexes of Ru(III$\text{1}\text{2}$) and Ru(IV) believed to contain oxo- or dihydroxo-bridging ligands. Spectral and electrochemical properties of the complexes prepared by oxidative dimerization are described and compared with previous reports of dioxygen and peroxo complexes of Ru^III(edta). The dimeric Ru^IV(edta) complex is shown to exhibit modest activity as a catalyst for the oxidation of water to dioxygen.     

A SIMPLE ROUTE FOR SYNTHESES OF TRIHALIDE-BRIDGED CARBONYL DIRUTHENIUM(II,III) COMPLEXES: CRYSTAL AND MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF ttt-[RuIICl2(CO)2(PPh3)2],[(CO)(AsPh3)2RuII(μ-Cl3)RuIIICl2(AsPh3)] AND ([CO)(PPh3)2RuII(μ-Br3)RuIIIBr2(PPh3)], SPECTROSCOPIES,ELECTROCHEMISTRY AND PROPERTIES

Abstract

The triply halide-bridged binuclear complexes [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(AsPh₃)₃] (AsPh₃ = triphenylarsine), [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(PPh₃)₂(AsPh₃)] (PPh₃ = triphenylphosphine), [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(AsPh₃)₂(PPh₃)], [Ru₂ Br₅(CO)(PPh₃)₃], [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(P{p-tol}₃)₂(PPh₃)] (P{p-tol}₃ = tri-p-tolylphosphine) and [Ru₂ Br₂Cl₃(PPh₃)₂(AsPh₃)] were prepared from the precursor compounds ttt-[RuX₂(CO)₂(P)₂] (X = Cl or Br) and [RuY₃(P')₂S]·S (Y = Cl or Br; P=PPh₃, AsPh₃ or P{p- tol}₃ and P' = AsPh₃ or PPh₃; S=DMA or MeOH, where DMA = N,N'-dimethylacetamide). The molecular structures of the binuclear complexes [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(AsPh₃)₃] (P2_1/c), [Ru₂Br₅(CO)(PPh₃)₃] (P2_1/c) and ttt-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] (P1) were determined by X-ray diffraction methods. The complexes are always formed by two Ru atoms bridged through three halide anions, two of which are × type (from the Ru^II precursor) and the other is Y type (from the ruthenium^III precursor) confirming our previously suggested mechanism for obtaining this class of complexes. The Ru^II atom is also coordinated to a carbon monoxide molecule and two P ligands from the ttt-starting isomer whereas the Ru^III atom is bonded to two non-bridging Y halides and one P' molecule. The presence of Ru^III was confirmed by EPR data, a technique that was also useful to suggest the symmetry of the complexes. The absence of intervalence charge-transfer transitions (IT) in the near infrared spectrum confirms that the binuclear complexes have localized valence. The IR spectra of the complexes show; (CO) bands close to 1970 cm^?1 and ν(Ru-Cl) or(Ru-Br) bands at about 230–380 cm^?1 corresponding to halides at terminal or bridged positions. Two widely separated redox processes, Ru^II/Ru^II←Ru^II/Ru^III→Ru^III/Ru^III, were observed by cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry.     

Redox properties of ruthenium(III/II)–edta complexes with o-phenylenediamine and o-benzoquinone diimine ligands

The reaction of [Ru^III(edta)(H₂O)]⁻ with o-phenylenediamine (opda) in water, under aerobic conditions, affords the diamagnetic [Ru^II(edta)(bqdi)]²⁻ product (where edta stands for the ethylenediaminetetraacetate co-ligand, and bqdi represents the non-innocent o-benzoquinone α,α^′-diimine ligand). In the current communication, the redox chemistry of this system in aqueous solution is described in details on the basis of electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical studies. The electrochemical behavior of “free” opda is rather complicated with further chemical reactions following the irreversible two-proton/two-electron oxidation (opda→bqdi+2e⁻+2H⁺), whereas its complex is electrochemically well-behaved with two chemically reversible redox processes: the monoelectronic couple associated with the metal ion (Ru^III/Ru^II) and another bielectronic step centered on the coordinated ligand (bqdi/opda). The set of UV–Vis electronic spectra were obtained by electrolytical generation, in situ, of all the redox species accessible in the CV working conditions (i.e., the starting [Ru^II(edta)(bqdi)]²⁻, the fully oxidized [Ru^III(edta)(bqdi)]⁻, and the fully reduced [Ru^II(edta)(opda)]²⁻ species), which are stable and totally interconvertible. The electrochemistry and absorption spectroscopy of these complexes in water were found to be comparable with the tetraammine counterparts. A remarkable difference in redox behavior between the diimine- and the analogous dioxolene-complexes was also revealed by comparison of the system reported herein with the one derived from catechol, and rationalized in terms of the quite efficient π-accepting electronic nature of the bqdi ligand.     

[RuIII(EDTA)(H2O)]− catalyzed oxidation of biologically important thiols by H2O2

[Ru^III(EDTA)(H₂O)]^? (EDTA^4? = ethylenediaminetetraacetate) catalyzes the oxidation of biological thiols, RSH (RSH = cysteine, glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, penicillamine) using H₂O₂ as precursor oxidant. The kinetics of the oxidation process were studied spectrophotometrically as a function of [Ru^III(EDTA)(H₂O)]^?, [H₂O₂], [RSH], and pH (4–8). Spectral analyses and kinetic data are suggestive of a catalytic pathway in which the RSH reacts with [Ru^III(EDTA)] catalyst complex to form [Ru^III((EDTA)(SR)]^2? intermediate species. In the subsequent reaction step the oxidant, H₂O₂, reacts directly with the coordinated S of the [Ru^III((EDTA)(SR)]^2? intermediate leading to formation of the disulfido (RSSR) oxidation product (identified by HPLC and ESI-MS studies) of thiols (RSH). Based on the experimental results, a working mechanism involving oxo-transfer from H₂O₂ to the coordinated thiols is proposed for the catalytic oxidation.     

Experimental and DFT Evidence for the Fractional Non‐Innocence of a β‐Diketonate Ligand

New compounds [Ru(pap)₂(L)](ClO₄), [Ru(pap)(L)₂], and [Ru(acac)₂(L)] (pap=2‐phenylazopyridine, L^?=9‐oxidophenalenone, acac^?=2,4‐pentanedionate) have been prepared and studied regarding their electron‐transfer behavior, both experimentally and by using DFT calculations. [Ru(pap)₂(L)](ClO₄) and [Ru(acac)₂(L)] were characterized by crystal‐structure analysis. Spectroelectrochemistry (EPR, UV/Vis/NIR), in conjunction with cyclic voltammetry, showed a wide range of about 2 V for the potential of the Ru^III/II couple, which was in agreement with the very different characteristics of the strongly π‐accepting pap ligand and the σ‐donating acac^? ligand. At the rather high potential of +1.35 V versus SCE, the oxidation of L^? into L^. could be deduced from the near‐IR absorption of [Ru^III(pap)(L^.)(L^?)]²⁺. Other intense long‐wavelength transitions, including LMCT (L^?→Ru^III) and LL/CT (pap^.?→L^?) processes, were confirmed by TD‐DFT results. DFT calculations and EPR data for the paramagnetic intermediates allowed us to assess the spin densities, which revealed two cases with considerable contributions from L‐radical‐involving forms, that is, [Ru^III(pap⁰)₂(L^?)]²⁺?[Ru^II(pap⁰)₂(L^.)]²⁺ and [Ru^III(pap⁰)(L^?)₂]⁺?[Ru^II(pap⁰)(L^?)(L^?)]⁺. Calculations of electrogenerated complex [Ru^II(pap^.?)(pap⁰)(L^?)] displayed considerable negative spin density (?0.188) at the bridging metal.     

RuIII(edta) catalyzed hydrogenation of bicarbonate to formate

Selective hydrogenation of bicarbonate to formate catalyzed by a ruthenium(III) complex, [Ru^III(edta)] (edta^4? = ethylenediaminetetraacetate), at moderate H₂ pressure (2–8 atm) and temperature (30–40 °C) is reported. Formation of formate, the only reduction product, was identified by ¹³C NMR analysis of the resultant reaction mixture. Based on the spectral data, a working mechanism (admittedly speculative) involving the formation of ruthenium(III)-bicarbonate complex, [Ru^III(edta)(HCO₃)]^2?, is proposed for the catalytic reaction.     

Evaluation of the Oxo‐bridged Dinuclear Ruthenium Ammine Complex as Redox Mediator in an Electrochemical Biosensor

The mediation of electron‐transfer by oxo‐bridged dinuclear ruthenium ammine [(bpy)₂(NH₃)Ru^III(µ‐O)Ru^III(NH₃)(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ for the oxidation of glucose was investigated by cyclic voltammetry. These ruthenium (III) complexes exhibit appropriate redox potentials of 0.131–0.09 V vs. SCE to act as electron‐transfer mediators. The plot of anodic current vs. the glucose concentration was linear in the concentration range between 2.52×10^?5 and 1.00×10^?4 mol L^?1. Moreover, the apparent Michaelis‐Menten kinetic (K_M^app) and the catalytic (K_cat) constants were 8.757×10^?6 mol L^?1 and 1,956 s^?1, respectively, demonstrating the efficiency of the ruthenium dinuclear oxo‐complex [(bpy)₂(NH₃)Ru^III(µ‐O)Ru^III(NH₃)(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ as mediator of redox electron‐transfer.     

Comparative Study of Ruthenium(II) and Ruthenium(III) Complexes with the Ligand dmbpy (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐Dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine)

The complex cis‐[Ru^III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂](PF₆) ( 2 ) (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine) was obtained from the reaction of cis‐[Ru^II(dmbpy)₂Cl₂] ( 1 ) with ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate followed by precipitation with saturated ammonium hexafluoridophosphate. The ¹H NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex confirms the presence of paramagnetic metal atoms, whereas that of the Ru^II complex displays diamagnetism. The ³¹P NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex shows one signal for the phosphorus atom of the PF₆^– ion. The perspective view of each [Ru^II/III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂]^0/+ unit manifests that the ruthenium atom is in hexacoordinate arrangement with two dmbpy ligands and two chlorido ligands in cis position. As the oxidation state of the central ruthenium metal atom becomes higher, the average Ru–Cl bond length decreases whereas the Ru–N (dmbpy) bond length increases. The cis‐positioned dichloro angle in Ru^III is 1.3° wider than that in the Ru^II. The dihedral angles between pair of planar six‐membered pyridyl ring in the dmbpy ligand for the Ru^II are 4.7(5)° and 5.7(4)°. The observed inter‐planar angle between two dmbpy ligands in the Ru^II is 89.08(15)°, whereas the value for the Ru^III is 85.46(20)°.     

Synthesis of Pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidin‐4‐ones Catalyzed by Br?nsted‐acidic Ionic Liquids as Highly Efficient and Reusable Catalysts

A convenient and efficient method for the synthesis of pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidin‐4‐ones via heterocyclization reaction of 5‐amino‐1H‐pyrazole‐4‐carboxamides with triethyl orthoesters using two Br?nsted‐acidic ionic liquids, 3‐methyl‐1‐(4‐sulfonic acid)butylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate [MIM⁺(CH₂)₄SO₃H][HSO₄^?] or N‐(4‐sulfonic acid)butyl triethylammonium hydrogen sulfate [Et₃N⁺(CH₂)₄SO₃H][HSO₄^?], as efficient homogeneous catalysts under solvent‐free conditions is described.     

A Highly Oxidizing and Isolable Oxoruthenium(V) Complex [RuV(N4O)(O)]2+: Electronic Structure,Redox Properties,and Oxidation Reactions Investigated by DFT Calculations

The electronic structure and redox properties of the highly oxidizing, isolable Ru^V?O complex [Ru^V(N₄O)(O)]²⁺, its oxidation reactions with saturated alkanes (cyclohexane and methane) and inorganic substrates (hydrochloric acid and water), and its intermolecular coupling reaction have been examined by DFT calculations. The oxidation reactions with cyclohexane and methane proceed through hydrogen atom transfer in a transition state with a calculated free energy barrier of 10.8 and 23.8 kcal mol^?1, respectively. The overall free energy activation barrier (ΔG^≠=25.5 kcal mol^?1) of oxidation of hydrochloric acid can be decomposed into two parts: the formation of [Ru^III(N₄O)(HOCl)]²⁺ (ΔG=15.0 kcal mol^?1) and the substitution of HOCl by a water molecule (ΔG^≠=10.5 kcal mol^?1). For water oxidation, nucleophilic attack on Ru^V?O by water, leading to O? O bond formation, has a free energy barrier of 24.0 kcal mol^?1, the major component of which comes from the cleavage of the H? OH bond of water. Intermolecular self‐coupling of two molecules of [Ru^V(N₄O)(O)]²⁺ leads to the [(N₄O)Ru^IV? O₂? Ru^III(N₄O)]⁴⁺ complex with a calculated free energy barrier of 12.0 kcal mol^?1.     

Stabilization of High‐Valence Ruthenium with Silicotungstate Ligands: Preparation,Structural Characterization,and Redox Studies of Ruthenium(III)‐Substituted α‐Keggin‐Type Silicotungstates with Pyridine Ligands, [SiW11O39RuIII(Py)]5−

Ruthenium(III)‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type silicotungstates with pyridine‐based ligands, [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(Py)]^5?, (Py: pyridine ( 1 ), 4‐pyridine‐carboxylic acid ( 2 ), 4,4′‐bipyridine ( 3 ), 4‐pyridine‐acetamide ( 4 ), and 4‐pyridine‐methanol ( 5 )) were prepared by reacting [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(H₂O)]^5? with the pyridine derivatives in water at 80 °C and then isolated as their hydrated cesium salts. These compounds were characterized using cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV/Vis, IR, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, titration, and X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) analysis (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge). Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis of compounds 2 , 3 , and 4 revealed that Ru^III was incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and was coordinated by pyridine derivatives through a Ru? N bond. In the solid state, compounds 2 and 3 formed a dimer through π? π interaction of the pyridine moieties, whereas they existed as monomers in solution. CV indicated that the incorporated Ru^III–Py was reversibly oxidized into the Ru^IV–Py derivative and reduced into the Ru^II–Py derivative.     

A TRICHLORO-BRIDGED DIRUTHENIUM (II,III) COMPLEX: PREPARATION,PROPERTIES AND X-RAY STRUCTURE OF TRI(-μ-CHLORO) DICHLOROCARBONYLTRIS (TRIPHENYLPHOSPHINE)DIRUTHENIUM(II,III)

Abstract

The triply chloro-bridged binuclear complex [Ru₂Cl₅(CO)(PPh₃)₃]·CH₂Cl₂, (PPh₃ = triphenylphosphine), M_r = 1279.23, prepared from the precursor compound [RuCl₃(PPh₃)₂DMA]·DMA (DMA = N,N′-dimethylacetamide) and crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. The structure was solved from 6994 independent reflections for which I > 3σ(I) by Patterson and difference Fourier techniques and refined to a final R = 0.042. The complex is formed by two Ru atoms bridged through three chloride anions. One Ru atom is further coordinated to two non-bridging Cl atoms and a triphenylphosphine ligand, whereas the other is bonded to two PPh₃ ligands and a carbon monoxide molecule. The presence of Ru^III was confirmed by EPR data. The absence of an intervalence charge-transfer transition (IT) in the near-infrared spectrum suggests that the binuclear complex is of a localized valence type. The IR spectrum shows a ν_CO band at 1964cm^? and ν_Ru-Cl bands at 328, 280 cm^?1, corresponding to chlorides at terminal positions and 250, 225 cm^?1 for the bridged ones. Two redox processes, Ru^II/Ru^II (E_1/2 = -0.29 V) ← Ru^II/Ru^III ← (E_1/2 = 1.19 V) Ru^III/Ru^III, were observed by cyclic voltammetry.     

Bis(sulfonylimide)ruthenium(VI) Porphyrins: X‐ray Crystal Structure and Mechanism of C?H Bond Amination by Density Functional Theory Calculations

The X‐ray crystal structure of [Ru^VI(NMs)₂(tmp)] (Ms=SO₂‐ p‐MeOC₆H₄; tmp=5,10,15,20‐tetramesitylporphyrinato(2?)), a metal sulfonylimide complex that can undergo alkene aziridination and C? H bond amination reactions, shows a Ru?N distance of 1.79(3) Å and Ru‐N‐S angle of 162.5(3)°. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the electronic structures of [Ru^VI(NMs)₂(tmp)] and model complex [Ru^VI(NMs)₂(por⁰)] (por⁰=unsubstituted porphyrinato(2?)) using the M06L functional gave results in agreement with experimental observations. For the amination of ethylbenzene by the singlet ground state of [Ru^VI(NMs)₂(por⁰)], DFT calculations using the M06L functional revealed an effectively concerted pathway involving rate‐limiting hydrogen atom abstraction without a distinct radical rebound step. The substituent effect on the amination reactivity of ethylbenzene by [Ru^VI(NX)₂(por⁰)] (X=SO₂‐p‐YC₆H₄ with Y=MeO, Me, H, Cl, NO₂) was examined. Electron‐withdrawing Y groups lower the energy of the LUMOs of [Ru^VI(NX)₂(por⁰)], thus facilitating their interaction with the low‐lying HOMO of the ethylbenzene C? H bond and hence increasing the reactivity of [Ru^VI(NX)₂(por⁰)]. DFT calculations on the amination/aziridination reactions of [Ru^VI(NSO₂C₆H₅)₂(por⁰)] with pent‐4‐enal, an aldehyde substrate bearing acyl, homoallylic, and allylic C? H bonds and a C?C bond, revealed a lower reaction barrier for the amination of the acyl C? H bond than for both the amination of the other C? H bonds and aziridination of the C?C bond in this substrate.     

Photochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Catalyzed by a Ruthenium‐Substituted Polyoxometalate

A polyoxometalate of the Keggin structure substituted with Ru^III, ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉] in which ⁶Q=(C₆H₁₃)₄N⁺, catalyzed the photoreduction of CO₂ to CO with tertiary amines, preferentially Et₃N, as reducing agents. A study of the coordination of CO₂ to ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉] showed that 1) upon addition of CO₂ the UV/Vis spectrum changed, 2) a rhombic signal was obtained in the EPR spectrum (g_x=2.146, g_y=2.100, and g_z=1.935), and 3) the ¹³C NMR spectrum had a broadened peak of bound CO₂ at 105.78 ppm (Δ_1/2=122 Hz). It was concluded that CO₂ coordinates to the Ru^III active site in both the presence and absence of Et₃N to yield ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(CO₂)SiW₁₁O₃₉]. Electrochemical measurements showed the reduction of Ru^III to Ru^II in ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(CO₂)SiW₁₁O₃₉] at ?0.31 V versus SCE, but no such reduction was observed for ⁶Q₅[Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉]. DFT‐calculated geometries optimized at the M06/PC1//PBE/AUG‐PC1//PBE/PC1‐DF level of theory showed that CO₂ is preferably coordinated in a side‐on manner to Ru^III in the polyoxometalate through formation of a Ru? O bond, further stabilized by the interaction of the electrophilic carbon atom of CO₂ to an oxygen atom of the polyoxometalate. The end‐on CO₂ bonding to Ru^III is energetically less favorable but CO₂ is considerably bent, thus favoring nucleophilic attack at the carbon atom and thereby stabilizing the carbon sp² hybridization state. Formation of a O₂C–NMe₃ zwitterion, in turn, causes bending of CO₂ and enhances the carbon sp² hybridization. The synergetic effect of these two interactions stabilizes both Ru–O and C–N interactions and probably determines the promotional effect of an amine on the activation of CO₂ by [Ru^III(H₂O)SiW₁₁O₃₉]^5?. Electronic structure analysis showed that the polyoxometalate takes part in the activation of both CO₂ and Et₃N. A mechanistic pathway for photoreduction of CO₂ is suggested based on the experimental and computed results.     

Pt2(HSO4)2(SO4)2, the First Binary Sulfate of Platinum

Red single crystals of Pt₂(HSO₄)₂(SO₄)₂ were obtained by the reaction of elemental platinum with conc. sulfuric acid at 350 °C in sealed glass ampoules. The crystal structure (monoclinic, P2₁/c, Z = 2, a = 868.6(2), b = 826.2(1), c = 921.8(2) pm, β=116.32(1)°, R_all = 0.0348) shows dumbbell shaped Pt₂⁶⁺ cations which are coordinated by four SO₄^2— and two HSO₄^— ions. Each of the sulfate ions is attached to another Pt₂⁶⁺ ion yielding layers according to equation/tex2gif-stack-1.gif[Pt₂(SO₄)_4/2(HSO₄)_2/1]. The layers are connected by hydrogen bonds with the OH group of the hydrogensulfate ion as donor and the non‐bonding oxygen atom of the sulfate ion as acceptor.     

Ruthenium(II/III)‐Based Compounds with Encouraging Antiproliferative Activity against Non‐small‐Cell Lung Cancer

Hereby we present the synthesis of several ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) dithiocarbamato complexes. Proceeding from the Na[trans‐Ru^III(dmso)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and cis‐[Ru^II(dmso)₄Cl₂] ( 3 ) precursors, the diamagnetic, mixed‐ligand [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes 4 and 5 , the paramagnetic, neutral [Ru^IIIL₃] monomers 6 and 7 , the antiferromagnetically coupled ionic α‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl complexes 8 and 9 as well as the β‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl dinuclear species 10 and 11 (L=dimethyl‐ (DMDT) and pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDT)) were obtained. All the compounds were fully characterised by elemental analysis as well as ¹H NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, for the first time the crystal structures of the dinuclear β‐[Ru^III₂(dmdt)₅]BF₄ ? CHCl₃ ? CH₃CN and of the novel [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes were also determined and discussed. For both the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^II and Ru^III complexes the central metal atoms assume a distorted octahedral geometry. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes has been evaluated on non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI‐H1975 cells. All the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^III dithiocarbamato compounds (i.e., complexes 6 – 10 ) show interesting cytotoxic activity, up to one order of magnitude higher with respect to cisplatin. Otherwise, no significant antiproliferative effect for either the precursors 2 and 3 or the Ru^II complexes 4 and 5 has been observed.     

Manganese mercury thio­cyanate (MMTC) glycol mono­methyl ether

In the title complex, [MnHg(NCS)₄(C₃H₈O₂)]_n, each Hg atom is tetrahedrally coordinated with four S atoms of the SCN^? ions, and each Mn atom is octahedrally coordinated with four N atoms of the SCN^? ions, one hydroxyl O atom and one ethereal O atom of the glycol mono­methyl ether mol­ecule. Each pair of Hg and Mn atoms is bridged by one SCN^? ion. A 24‐membered Mn₃Hg₃(SCN)₆ ring is formed as the strucrural unit, with the six metal atoms in a chair‐form hexagonal arrangement. The units are condensed and linked three‐dimensionally in the crystal resulting in a diamond‐like structure.