On extremal properties for the polar derivative of polynomials

If p(z) is a polynomial of degree n having all its zeros on |z| = k, k ≤ 1, then it is proved[5] that max |z|=1 |p′(z)| ≤ kn1n + kn m|z|=ax1 |p(z)|. In this paper, we generalize the above inequality by extending it to the polar derivative of a polynomial of the type p(z) = cnzn + ∑n j=μ cn jzn j, 1 ≤μ≤ n. We also obtain certain new inequalities concerning the maximum modulus of a polynomial with restricted zeros.     

On a problem of L. Leindler concerning strong approximation by Fourier series and Lipschitz classes

Пусть? — возрастающа я непрерывная фцнкци я на [0,π],?(0)=0 и $$\mathop \smallint \limits_0^h \frac{{\varphi \left( t \right)}}{t}dt = O\left( {\varphi \left( h \right)} \right){\text{ }}\left( {h \to 0} \right).$$ Положим $$\psi \left( h \right) = h\mathop \smallint \limits_h^\pi \frac{{\varphi \left( t \right)}}{{t^2 }}dt \left( {h \in (0, \pi ]} \right).$$ Доказывается следую щая теорема.Пусть f∈ С[?π, π], ω(f, δ)=О(?(δ))) и $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{1}{{\varphi \left( {\left| h \right|} \right)}}\left| {f\left( {x + h} \right) - f\left( x \right)} \right| = 0$$ для x∈E?[?π, π], ¦E¦>0. Тогда д ля сопряженной функц ии f почти всюду на E выполн яется соотношение $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{1}{{\psi \left( {\left| h \right|} \right)}}\left| {\tilde f\left( {x + h} \right) - \tilde f\left( x \right)} \right| = 0.$$ Из этой теоремы вытек ает положительное ре шение одной задачи Л. Лейндлера.     

A Mean-Value Theorem for Multiplicative Functions on the Set of Shifted Primes

Let f be a complex-valued multiplicative function, letp denote a prime and let π(x) be the number of primes not exceeding x. Further put $$m_p (f): = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } \frac{1}{{\pi (x)}}\sum\limits_{p \leqslant x} {f(p + 1)} {\text{, }}M(f): = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } \frac{1}{x}\sum\limits_{n \leqslant x} {f(n)}$$ and suppose that $$\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{x \to \infty } \frac{1}{x}\sum\limits_{n \leqslant x} {\left| {f\left( n \right)} \right|^2 } < \infty ,\sum\limits_{p \leqslant x} {\left| {f\left( n \right)} \right|^2 } \ll x\left( {\ln x} \right)^{ - \varrho } ,$$ with some \varrho > 0. For such functions we prove: If there is a Dirichlet character χ_d such that the mean-value M(f χ_d) exists and is different from zero,then the mean-value m_p(f) exists. If the mean-value M(f) exists, then the same is true for the mean-valuem_p(f) .     

OnL 1-convergence of Walsh-Fourier series I

We prove the convergence in theL ¹(0, 1)-metric of Walsh-Fourier series \(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^\infty {a_k w_k \left( x \right)} \) of an integrable function with coefficients such that lim_n→∞ and the following Tauberian condition of Hardy-Karamata kind is satisfied: $$\mathop {lim}\limits_{\lambda \to 1 + 0} {\text{ }}\mathop {lim}\limits_{n \to \infty } \sum\limits_{k = n}^{\left[ {\lambda n} \right]} {k^{p - 1} \left| {\Delta a_k } \right|^p } = 0,$$ , wherep>1, [·] denotes the integral part, and Δa _k=a_k?a_k+1.     

A Littlewood-Paley type inequality

In this note we prove the following theorem: Let u be a harmonic function in the unit ball and . Then there is a constant C = C(p, n) such that

Inequalities for absolute maxima of a polynomial and its derivative

Suppose z ₁, z ₂, ... z _n are complex numbers with absolute values more than 1 and Arg z _j Arg z _k for j k where Arg w stands for the argument of the complex number w in [0,2). In this note we show that

An Elementary Proof of Pólya-Vinogradov's Inequality, II

Let be a primitive character mod k, k > 2. In [1], the following elementary estimate

Асимптотические рав енства для интеграло в от модуля суммы кратн ого ряда из синусов

Assume that the coefficients of the series $$\mathop \sum \limits_{k \in N^m } a_k \mathop \Pi \limits_{i = 1}^m \sin k_i x_i $$ satisfy the following conditions: a) a_k → 0 for k₁ + k₂ + ...+k_m →∞, b) \(\delta _{B,G}^M (a) = \mathop {\mathop \sum \limits_{k_i = 1}^\infty }\limits_{i \in B} \mathop {\mathop \sum \limits_{k_j = 2}^\infty }\limits_{j \in G} \mathop {\mathop \sum \limits_{k_v = 0}^\infty }\limits_{v \in M\backslash (B \cup G)} \mathop \Pi \limits_{i \in B} \frac{1}{{k_i }}|\mathop \sum \limits_{I_j = 1}^{[k_j /2]} (\nabla _{l_G }^G (\Delta _1^{M\backslash B} a_k ))\mathop \Pi \limits_{j \in G} l_j^{ - 1} |< \infty ,\) for ∨B?M, ∨G?M,B∩G, where M={1,2, ...,m}, $$\begin{gathered} \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\Delta _1^j a_k = a_k - a_{k_{M\backslash \{ j\} } ,k_{j + 1} } ,\Delta _1^B a_k = \Delta _1^{B\backslash \{ j\} } (\Delta _1^j a_k ), \hfill \\ \Delta _{l_j }^j a_k = a_{k_{M\backslash \{ j\} } ,k_j - l_j } - a_{k_{M\backslash \{ j\} } ,k_j + l_j } ,\nabla _{l_G }^G a_k = \nabla _{l_{G\backslash \{ j\} } }^{G\backslash \{ j\} } (\nabla _{l_j }^j a_k ). \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ Then for all n∈N^m the following asymptotic equation is valid: $$\mathop \smallint \limits_{{\rm T}_{\pi /(2n + 1)}^m } |\mathop \sum \limits_{k \in N^m } a_k \mathop \Pi \limits_{i \in M} \sin k_i x_i |dx = \mathop \sum \limits_{k = 1}^n \left| {a_k } \right|\mathop \Pi \limits_{i \in M} k^{ - 1} + O(\mathop {\mathop \sum \limits_{B,{\mathbf{ }}G \subset M} }\limits_{B \ne M} \delta _{B,G}^M (a)).$$ Here \(T_{\pi /(2n + 1)}^m = \left\{ {x = (x1,x2,...,xm):\pi /(2n + 1) \leqq xi \leqq \pi ;i = \overline {1,m} } \right\}\) . In the one-dimensional case such an equation was proved by S. A. Teljakovskii.     

Caratterizzazione delle tracce per spazi con peso

Sunto Si prova un teorema di tracce per spazi di funzioni, definite su R ₊ ⁿ , con norme del tipo . Entrata in Redazione il 23 luglio 1969. Lavoro eseguito nell'ambito dei gruppi di ricerca del Comitato Nazionale per la Matematica del C.N.R.     

Weighted approximation of entire functions of exponential type of several variables by trigonometric polynomials

Letf be an entire function (in Cⁿ) of exponential type for whichf(x)=0(?(x)) on the real subspace \(\mathbb{R}^w (\phi \geqslant 1,{\mathbf{ }}\mathop {\lim }\limits_{\left| x \right| \to \infty } \phi (x) = \infty )\) and ?δ>0?C_δ>0 $$\left| {f(z)} \right| \leqslant C_\delta \exp \left\{ {h_s (y) + S\left| z \right|} \right\},z = x + iy$$ where h, (x)=sup〈3, x〉, S being a convex set in ?ⁿ. Then for any ?, ?>0, the functionf can be approximated with any degree of accuracy in the form p→ \(\mathop {\sup }\limits_{x \in \mathbb{R}^w } \frac{{\left| {P(x)} \right|}}{{\varphi (x)}}\) by linear combinations of functions x→expi〈λx〉 with frequenciesX belonging to an ?-neighborhood of the set S.     

Uniform Approximation of Nonperiodic Functions Defined on the Entire Axis

Using the following notation: C is the space of continuous bounded functions f equipped with the norm , V is the set of functions f such that , the set E consists of fCV and possesses the following property:

On multiplicative functions on consecutive integers

Let f and g be multiplicative functions of modulus 1. Assume that \( {\lim_{x \to \infty }}\frac{1}{x}\left| {\sum\nolimits_{n \leqslant x} {f(n)} } \right| = A > 0 \) and \( {\lim_{x \to \infty }}\frac{1}{x}\left| {\sum\nolimits_{n \leqslant x} {g(n)} } \right| = 0 \). We prove that, under these conditions,

$ \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } \frac{1}{x}\sum\limits_{n \leqslant x} {f(n)g(n + 1) = 0.}$

Concerning the Liouville function λ, we find an upper estimate for \( \frac{1}{x}\left| {\sum\limits_{n \leqslant x} {\lambda (n)\lambda (n + 1)} } \right| \) under the unproved hypothesis that L(s, χ) have Siegel zeros for an infinite sequence of L-functions.

     

A Generalized Measure Concentrated on a Closed Set of Measure Zero

When E is a closed set of measure zero in the dyadic group and the Walsh series satisfies

On the strong summation of Fourier series with variable exponents

Пустьf 2π-периодическ ая суммируемая функц ия, as _k (x) еë сумма Фурье порядк аk. В связи с известным ре зультатом Зигмунда о сильной суммируемости мы уст анавливаем, что если λn→∞, то сущес твует такая функцияf, что почти всюду $$\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left\{ {\frac{1}{n}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = n + 1}^{2n} |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _{2n} } } \right\}^{1/\lambda _{2n} } = \infty .$$ Отсюда, в частности, вы текает, что если λn?∞, т о существует такая фун кцияf, что почти всюду $$\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left\{ {\frac{1}{n}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = 0}^n |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _k } } \right\}^{1/\lambda _n } = \infty .$$ Пусть, далее, ω-модуль н епрерывности и $$H^\omega = \{ f:\parallel f(x + h) - f(x)\parallel _c \leqq K_f \omega (h)\} .$$ . Мы доказываем, что есл и λ _n ?∞, то необходимым и достаточным условие м для того, чтобы для всехf∈H ^ω выполнялос ь соотношение $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left\{ {\frac{1}{n}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = n + 1}^{2n} |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _n } } \right\}^{1/\lambda _n } = 0(x \in [0;2\pi ])$$ является условие $$\omega \left( {\frac{1}{n}} \right) = o\left( {\frac{1}{{\log n}} + \frac{1}{{\lambda _n }}} \right).$$ Это же условие необхо димо и достаточно для того, чтобы выполнялось соотнош ение $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \frac{1}{{n + 1}}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = 0}^n |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _k } = 0(f \in H^\omega ,x \in [0;2\pi ]).$$      

On the decay rate of (p, A)-lacunary series

A power series with radius of convergence equal 1 is called a (p,A)-lacunary one if n_k ≥ Ak^p, A > 0, 1 < p < ∞. It is proved that if 1 < p < 2 and f(x) is a (p,A)-lacunary series that satisfies the condition

On the strong approximation by the (C, α)-means of Fourier series. II

стАтьь ьВльЕтсь пРОД ОлжЕНИЕМ пРЕДыДУЩЕИ ОДНОИМЕННОИ РАБОты АВтОРА, гДЕ ИжУ ЧАлсь пОРьДОк ВЕлИЧИН пРИ УслОВИьх, ЧтО α>-1/2, Рα >- 1 И ЧтО МАтРИцАt _nk УДОВлЕтВОРьЕт НЕкОт ОРОМУ УслОВИУ РЕгУльРНОстИ. жДЕсь ДОкАжыВАЕтсь, Ч тО ЕслИf∈H ^Ω, тО ВыпОлНь Етсь ОцЕНкА $$\left\{ {\frac{1}{{\lambda _n }}\mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = n - \lambda _n + 1}^n \left| {\sigma _k^\alpha \left( x \right) - f\left( x \right)} \right|^p } \right\}^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 p}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} p}} = O\left( {\left\{ {\frac{1}{{\lambda _n }}\mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = n - \lambda _n + 1}^n \left( {\frac{1}{k}\mathop \smallint \limits_{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 k}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} k}}^{2\pi } \frac{{\omega \left( t \right)}}{{t^2 }}dt} \right)^p } \right\}^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 p}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} p}} + \left( {\frac{{\lambda _n }}{n}} \right)^\alpha \omega \left( {\frac{1}{n}} \right)} \right)$$ (λ₁=1, λ_n+1-λ_n≦1), А тАкжЕ ЧтО Ёт А ОцЕНкА ОкОНЧАтЕльН А В сВОИх тЕРМИНАх; пОДОБ НыИ РЕжУль-тАт спРАВЕДлИВ тАкжЕ И Дль сОпРьжЕННОИ ФУНкцИИ . ДОкАжыВАЕтсь, ЧтО Усл ОВИьα>?1/2 Иpα>?1, кОтОРыЕ Б ылИ НАлОжЕНы В УпОМьНУтО И ВышЕ ЧАстИ I, сУЩЕстВЕН Ны.     

Optimal recovery methods for the integral on classes of differentiable functions

Найдены методы восст ановления интеграла по информации $$I\left( f \right) = \left\{ {f^{(j)} \left( {x_i } \right)\left( {j = 0, ..., \gamma _i - 1; i = 1, ..., n; 1 \leqq \gamma _i \leqq r; \gamma _i + ... + \gamma _n \leqq N} \right.} \right\},$$ оптимальные на класс ахW _p ^r ,r=1,2,...; 1≦p≦∞. Это позволило, в частност и, получить наилучшие для классаW _p ^r квадратурные форму лы вида $$\mathop \smallint \limits_0^1 f\left( x \right)dx = \mathop \Sigma \limits_{i = 1}^n \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^{\gamma _i - 1} a_{ij} f^{(j)} \left( {x_i } \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} b_j f^{(2j - 1)} \left( 0 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} c_k f^{(2k - 1)} \left( 1 \right) + R\left( f \right)$$ И $$\mathop \smallint \limits_0^1 f\left( x \right)dx = af\left( 0 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{i = 1}^n \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 0}^{\gamma _i - 1} a_{ij} f^{(j)} \left( {x_i } \right) + bf\left( 1 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} b_j f^{(2j - 1)} \left( 0 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} c_k f^{(2k - 1)} \left( 1 \right) + R\left( f \right).$$      

Some estimates of differentiable functions

Suppose thatx(t) ∈ C _[a,b ^(n)] and has n zeros at the pointsa and b. It is shown that if x⁽ⁿ⁾(t) preserves sign on [a, b], then $$\left| {x\left( t \right)} \right| \geqslant \frac{{p_0 }}{{n - 1}}\mathop {\left[ {\mathop {\sup }\limits_{\tau \in \left( {a, b} \right)} \frac{{\left| {x\left( \tau \right)} \right|}}{{\left( {\tau - a} \right)^{p - 1} \left( {b - \tau } \right)^{q - 1} }}} \right]}\limits_{\left( {a< t< b} \right),} \left( {t - a} \right)^p \left( {b - t} \right)^q $$ where p and q are the multiplicities of the zeros of x(t) ata and b, respectively, and p_o=min{p,q}. Two-sided estimates of the Green's function for a two-point interpolation problem for the operator Lx ≡ x⁽ⁿ⁾ are established in the proof. As an application, new conditions for the solvability of de la Vallée Poussin's two-point boundary problems are obtained.     

An Elementary Approach to an Eigenvalue Estimate for Matrices

A celebrated result of Johnson, Maurey, König and Retherford from 1977 states that for every complex matrix satisfies the following eigenvalue estimate:

Estimation of the remainder of a cubature formula on a Chebyshev grid

Let C(Q) denote the space of continuous functions f(x, y) in the square Q = [?1, 1] × [?1, 1] with the norm $\begin{gathered} \left\| f \right\| = \max \left| {f(x,y)} \right|, \hfill \\ (x,y) \in Q. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $ On a Chebyshev grid, a cubature formula of the form $\int\limits_{ - 1}^1 {\int\limits_{ - 1}^1 {\frac{1} {{\sqrt {(1 - x^2 )(1 - y^2 )} }}f(x,y)dxdy = \frac{{\pi ^2 }} {{mn}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^m {f\left( {\cos \frac{{2i - 1}} {{2n}}\pi ,\cos \frac{{2j - 1}} {{2m}}\pi } \right)} + R_{m,n} (f)} } } $ is considered in some class H(r ₁, r ₂) of functions f ?? C(Q) defined by a generalized shift operator. The remainder R _{m, n} (f) is proved to satisfy the estimate $\mathop {\sup }\limits_{f \in H(r_1 ,r_2 )} \left| {R_{m,n} (f)} \right| = O(n^{ - r_1 + 1} + m^{ - r_2 + 1} ), $ where r ₁, r ₂ > 1; ??^?1 ?? n/m ?? ?? with ?? > 0; and the constant in O(1) depends on ??.