On an estimate for Bloch and Doob norm and covering problem in Doob's class

For any fixed 0 < π ? 2π, let D(π) be the family of all holomorphic functions in the unit disk Δ which satisfy (i)f(0) = 0 and (ii) $\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{z\; \to \; \pi ¦f(z)¦\; ?\; 1}}$, for all π lying on some arc A_f ? ?Δ with arclength $\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{f}}\text{¦ ? π}$. We show that for each 0 < ε < 1, there is a π₀ > 0 such that for any f?D(π) with π < π₀, the Bloch and Doob norm respectively satisfy

$\text{6f6}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{=}\text{sup}\text{z?Δ}\text{|f′(z)| (1?|z|}{}^2\text{) > 2(1 ? ε)}\text{log}\text{1+}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}\text{1?}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$

$\text{6f6}{}_{\mathrm{D}}\text{=}\text{sup}\text{z?Δ}\text{|f′(z)| (1?|z|) > (1 ? ε)}\text{log}\text{1}\text{1?}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$

These two estimates do not hold with ε = 0.     

The resolvent of a singularly perturbed elliptic operator

Let A and B be uniformly elliptic operators of orders 2m and 2n, respectively, m > n. We consider the Dirichlet problems for the equations (?^{2(m ? n)}A + B + λ²ⁿI)u_? = f and (B + λ²ⁿI)u = f in a bounded domain Ω in R^k with a smooth boundary ?Ω. The estimate is derived. This result extends the results of [7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18]by giving estimates up to the boundary, improving the rate of convergence in ?, using lower norms, and considering operators of higher order with variable coefficients. An application to a parabolic boundary value problem is given.     

Problèmes de Neumann non linéaires sur les variétés riemanniennes

Nonlinear Neumann problems on riemannian manifolds. Let ($\text{M}\text{, g}$) be a C^∞ compact riemannian manifold of dimension n ? 2 whose boundary B is an (n ? 1)-dimensional submanifold and let $\text{M =}\text{M}\text{?B}$ be the interior of $\text{M}$. Study of Neumann problems of the form: $\text{Δφ +?(φ, x) = 0}\text{in}\text{M, (}\text{dφ}\text{dn}\text{) + g(φ, y) = 0}\text{on}\text{B}$, where, for every $\text{(t, x, y) ? R × M × B, ¦?(t, x)¦}\text{and}\text{¦g(t, y)¦}$ are bounded by $\text{C(1 + ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}\text{or}\text{C}\text{exp}\text{(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}$. Application to the determination of a conformal metric for which the scalar curvature of M and the mean curvature of B take prescribed values.     

Barriers for uniformly elliptic equations and the exterior cone condition

We consider the mixed boundary value problem $\text{Au = f}\text{in}\text{Ω, B}{}_0\text{u = g}{}_0\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{, B}{}_1\text{u = g}{}_1\text{in}\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$, where Ω is a bounded open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ whose boundary Γ is divided into disjoint open subsets Γ⁺ and Γ^? by an (n ? 2)-dimensional manifold ω in Γ. We assume A is a properly elliptic second order partial differential operator on $\text{Ω}$ and B_j, for j = 0, 1, is a normal jth order boundary operator satisfying the complementing condition with respect to A on $\text{Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The coefficients of the operators and Γ⁺, Γ^? and ω are all assumed arbitrarily smooth. As announced in [Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.83 (1977), 391–393] we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of the coefficients of the operators for the mixed boundary value problem to be well posed in Sobolev spaces. In fact, we construct an open subset $\text{T}$ of the reals such that, if $\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{= {u ? H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(Ω): Au = 0}}$ then for $\text{s ? =}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{1), (B}{}_0\text{,B}{}_1\text{): D}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{→ H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{) × H}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>s\; ?\; </mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(Γ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{)}$ is a Fredholm operator if and only if s ∈$\text{T}$ . Moreover, $\text{T}$ = ?_xew$\text{T}$_x, where the sets $\text{T}$_x are determined algebraically by the coefficients of the operators at x. If n = 2, $\text{T}$_x is the set of all reals not congruent (modulo 1) to some exceptional value; if n = 3, $\text{T}$_x is either an open interval of length 1 or is empty; and finally, if n ? 4, $\text{T}$_x is an open interval of length 1.     

The Lyapunov matrix equation SA+A1S=S1B1BS

The matrix equation $\text{SA+A}{}^1\text{S=S}{}^1\text{B}{}^1\text{BS}$ is studied, under the assumption that (A, B¹) is controllable, but allowing nonhermitian S. An inequality is given relating the dimensions of the eigenspaces of A and of the null space of S. In particular, if B has rank 1 and S is nonsingular, then S is hermitian, and the inertias of A and S are equal. Other inertial results are obtained, the role of the controllability of (A¹, B¹S¹) is studied, and a class of D-stable matrices is determined.     

Series inversion of some convolution transforms

We study degeneration for ? → + 0 of the two-point boundary value problems

$\text{τ?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{u := ?((au′)′ + bu′ + cu) ± xu′ ? κu = h, u(±1) = A ± B}$

, and convergence of the operators T_?⁺ and T_?^? on $\text{L}$²(?1, 1) connected with them, T_?^±u := τ_?^±u for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{, D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ u″ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}, T}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{u: = xu′}$

for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{), D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ xu′ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}}$

. Here ? is a small positive parameter, λ a complex “spectral” parameter; a, b and c are real $\text{b}$^∞-functions, a(x) ? γ > 0 for all x? [?1, 1] and h is a sufficiently smooth complex function. We prove that the limits of the eigenvalues of T_?⁺ and of T_?^? are the negative and nonpositive integers respectively by comparison of the general case to the special case in which a  1 and b  c  0 and in which we can compute the limits exactly. We show that (T_?⁺ ? λ)^?1 converges for ? → +0 strongly to (T₀⁺ ? λ)^?1 if $\text{R e λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. In an analogous way, we define the operator T_?⁺, n (n ? $\text{N}$ in the Sobolev space H₀^?n(? 1, 1) as a restriction of τ_?⁺ and prove strong convergence of (T⁺_?,n ? λ)^?1 for ? → +0 in this space of distributions if $\text{R e λ > ?n ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. With aid of the maximum principle we infer from this that, if h?$\text{C}$¹, the solution of τ_?⁺u ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B converges for ? → +0 uniformly on [?1, ? ?] ∪ [?, 1] to the solution of xu′ ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B for each p > 0 and for each λ ? $\text{C}$ if ? ?$\text{N}$.Finally we prove by duality that the solution of τ_?^?u ? λu = h converges to a definite solution of the reduced equation uniformly on each compact subset of (?1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) if h is sufficiently smooth and if 1 ? ?$\text{N}$.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Generalized Schur complements

Let A be an n×n complex matrix. For a suitable subspace $\text{M}$ of Cⁿ the Schur compression A _$\text{M}$ and the (generalized) Schur complement A_/$\text{M}$ are defined. If A is written in the form

$\text{A=}\text{B}\text{C}\text{S}\text{T}$

according to the decomposition $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{M}\text{⊕}\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{\perp }}$ and if B is invertible, then

$\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{=}\text{B}\text{C}\text{S}\text{SB}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{C}$

and

$\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{=}\text{0}\text{0}\text{0}\text{T?SB}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{C}\text{·}$

The commutativity rule for Schur complements is proved:

$\text{(A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{=(A)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{·}$

This unifies Crabtree and Haynsworth's quotient formula for (classical) Schur complements and Anderson's commutativity rule for shorted operators. Further, the absorption rule for Schur compressions is proved:

$\text{(A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{=(A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{=A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{whenever}\text{M}\text{?}\text{N}$

.     

A regularity result for singular nonlinear elliptic systems in inverse-power weighted Sobolev spaces

The compactness method to weighted spaces is extended to prove the following theorem:Let H_2,s¹(B₁) be the weighted Sobolev space on the unit ball in Rⁿ with norm

$\text{6ν6}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{2,s}}\text{=}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|ν|}{}^2\text{dx + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|Dν|}{}^2\text{dx.}$

Let n ? 2 ? s < n. Let u? [H_2,s¹(B₁) ∩ L^∞(B₁)]^N be a solution of the nonlinear elliptic system

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x,u) D}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{j\psi }}{}_{\mathrm{K}}\text{dx=0}$

, $\text{∨}\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{¦C}{}_0{}^1\text{(B}{}_1\text{)¦}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{where}\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}\text{¦ ? L, A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}$ are uniformly continuous functions of their arguments and satisfy:

$\text{|η|}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{N}\text{|η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{|}{}^2\text{?}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{,}\text{?η?R}{}^{\mathrm{Nn}}$

. Then there exists an R₁, 0 < R₁ < 1, and an α, 0 < α < 1, along with a set $\text{Ω ? B}{}_1$ such that (1) $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 2}}\text{(Ω) = 0}$, (2) Ω does not contain the origin; Ω does not contain B_R1, (3) $\text{B}{}_1\text{? Ω}$ is open, (4) u is $\text{Lip}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(B}{}_1\text{? Ω)}$; u is Lip_αB_R1.     

An inequality for pseudo-subplanes of sets of orthogonal latin squares

Let L₁, L₂,…, L_t be a given set of t mutually orthogonal order-n latin squares defined on a symbol set S, |S| = n. The squares are equivalent to a (t + 2)-netN of order n which has n² points corresponding to the n² cells of the squares. A line of the net N defined by the latin square L_i comprises the n points of the net which are specified by a set of n cells of L_i all of which contain the same symbol x of S. If we pick out a particular r × r block B of cells, a line which contains points corresponding to r of the cells of B will be called an r-cell line. If there exist r(r ? 1) such lines among the tn lines of N, we shall say that they form a pseudo-subplane of order r-the “pseudo” means that these lines need not belong to only r ? 1 of the latin squares. The purpose of the present note is to prove that the hypothesis that such a pseudo-plane exists in N implies that $\text{r}{}^3\text{? (t + 2)r}{}^2\text{+ r + nt ?}{}^1\text{0}$.     

Integral inequalities for generalized concave or convex functions

Let ψ be convex with respect to ?, B a convex body in Rⁿ and f a positive concave function on B. A well-known result by Berwald states that $\text{1}\text{¦B¦}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{ψ(f(x)) dx ? n ∝}{}_0{}^1\text{ψ(ξt)(1 ? t)}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1)}}\text{dt}$ (1) if ξ is chosen such that $\text{1}\text{¦B¦}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{?(f(x)) dx = n ∝}{}_0{}^1\text{?(ξt)(1 ? t)}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1)}}\text{dt}$.The main purpose in this paper is to characterize those functions f : B → R₊ such that (1) holds.     

Sobolev inequalities with remainder terms

The usual Sobolev inequality in $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 3, asserts that , with S_n being the sharp constant. This paper is concerned, instead, with functions restricted to bounded domains Ω ? $\text{R}$ⁿ. Two kinds of inequalities are established: (i) If ? = 0 on ?Ω, then with $\text{p =}\text{2}{}^1\text{2}$ and with $\text{q =}\text{n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. (ii) If ? ≠ 0 on ?Ω, then with $\text{q =}\text{2(n ? 1)}\text{(n ? 2)}$. Some further results and open problems in this area are also presented.     

Subproper splitting for rectangular matrices

In this paper iterative schemes for approximating a solution to a rectangular but consistent linear system Ax = b are studied. Let A?C^{m × n}_r. The splitting A = M ? N is called subproper if R(A) ? R(M) and $\text{R(A}{}^1\text{) ?R(M}{}^1\text{)}$. Consider the iteration $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= M}{}^2\text{Nx}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+ M}{}^2\text{b}$. We characterize the convergence of this scheme to a solution of the linear system. When A?R^m×ⁿ_r, monotonicity and the concept of subproper regular splitting are used to determine a necessary and a sufficient condition for the scheme to converge to a solution.     

Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.     

The algebra of hyperboloids of revolution

If we change the sign of p ? m columns (or rows) of an m × m positive definite symmetric matrix A, the resultant matrix B has p negative eigenvalues. We give systems of inequalities for the eigenvalues of B and of the matrix obtained from B by deleting one row and column. To obtain these, we first develop characterizations of the eigenvalues of B which are analogous to the minimum-maximum properties of the eigenvalues of a symmetric A, i.e. the Courant-Fischer theorem. These results arose from studying probability distributions on the hyperboloid of revolution

$\text{x}{}^2{}_1\text{+ ? + x}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{m?p}}\text{? x}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{m\; ?\; p\; +\; 1}}\text{? ? ? x}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{= 1}$

. By contrast, the familiar results are associated with the sphere x²₁ + ? + x²_m = 1.     

On the number of zeros of diagonal cubic forms

Let M_s, be the number of solutions of the equation

$\text{X}{}_1{}^3\text{+ X}{}_2{}^3\text{+ … + X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^3\text{=0}$

in the finite field GF(p). For a prime p ≡ 1(mod 3),

$\text{∑}\text{s=1}\text{∞}\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{X}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{=}\text{x}\text{1 ? px}\text{+}\text{x}{}^2\text{(p ? 1)(2 + dx)}\text{1 ? 3px}{}^2\text{? pdx}{}^3$

,

$\text{M}{}_3\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ d(p ? 1)}$

, and

$\text{M}{}_4\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ 6(p}{}^2\text{? p)}$

. Here d is uniquely determined by

$\text{4}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{= d}{}^2\text{+ 27b}{}^2\text{and}\text{d ≡ 1(}\text{mod}\text{3)}$

.     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

A family of difference sets in non-cyclic groups

A construction is given for difference sets in certain non-cyclic groups with the parameters $\text{v = q}{}^{\mathrm{s+1}}\text{{[}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s+1}}\text{? 1)}\text{(q ? 1)}\text{] + 1}}$, $\text{k = q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s+1}}\text{? 1)}\text{(q ? 1)}$, $\text{λ = q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{? 1)}\text{(q ? 1)}$, n = q^2s for every prime power q and every positive integer s. If q^s is odd, the construction yields at least $\text{1}\text{2}\text{(q}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{+ 1)}$ inequivalent difference sets in the same group. For q = 5, s = 2 a difference set is obtained with the parameters (v, k, λ, n) = (4000, 775, 150, 625), which has minus one as a multiplier.     

Inner functions in the unit ball of Cn

Let B be the open unit ball of $\text{C}$ⁿ, n > 1. Let I (for “inner”) be the set of all u ? H °(B) that have $\text{¦u¦ = 1}$ a.e. on the boundary S of B. Aleksandrov proved recently that there exist nonconstant u ? I. This paper strengthens his basic theorem and provides further information about I and the algebra Q generated by I. Let XY be the finite linear span of products xy, x ? X, y ? Y, and let $\text{¦X¦}$ be the norm closure, in L^∞ = L^∞(S), of X. Some results: set I is dense in the unit ball of H^∞(B) in the compact-open topology. On $\text{S,}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q}$ is weak¹-dense in $\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, ¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦}$ does not contain $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{, C(S) ?¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ ¦}\text{H}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦ ≠ L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$. (When $\text{n = 1, ¦Q¦ = H}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{and}\text{¦}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{Q¦ = L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$.) Every unimodular $\text{?}\text{?}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}$ is a pointwise limit a.e. of products $\text{u}\text{v}\text{?}\text{, u}\text{?}\text{I, ν}\text{?}\text{I}$. The zeros of every $\text{? ? 0}$ in the ball algebra (but not of every H^∞-function) can be matched by those of some u ? I, as can any finite number of derivatives at 0 if $\text{∥?∥}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{< 1}$. However, $\text{?}\text{u}$ cannot be bounded in B if u ? I is non-constant.     

The Hardy classes for functions in the class MV[α, k]

Suppose that f(z) = z + a₂z² + ··· + a_nz_n + ··· is regular in the unit disc $\text{D}\text{with}\text{[f(z) f′}\text{(z)}\text{z] ≠ 0}\text{in}\text{D}$, and further let α ? 0 and k ? 2. If $\text{∝}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}{}_{\mathrm{o}}\text{¦}\text{Re}\text{{(1 ? α)z[}\text{f′(z)}\text{f(z)}\text{] + α(1 + z[}\text{f″(z)}\text{f′(z)}\text{])}¦ dθ ? kπ}\text{for}\text{z ? D}$, then f(z) is said to belong to the class MV[α, k]. This class contains many of the special classes of regular and univalent functions. The authors determine the Hardy classes of which f(z), f′(z) and f″(z) belong and obtain growth estimates of a_n.