We prove that if is consistent then is consistent with the following statement: There is for every a model of cardinality which is -equivalent to exactly non-isomorphic models of cardinality . In order to get this result we introduce ladder systems and colourings different from the ``standard' counterparts, and prove the following purely combinatorial result: For each prime number and positive integer it is consistent with that there is a ``good' ladder system having exactly pairwise nonequivalent colourings.
- it is consistent with CH that everyGε $\mathcal{K}$ has 2ω many pairwise non-isomorphic subgraphs,
- the following proposition holds in L: (*)there is a Gε $\mathcal{K}$ such that for each partition (A, B) of ω1 either G?G[A] orG?G[B],
- the failure of (*) is consistent with ZFC.
We give wider application and simpler proofs of results describing the rate at which the digits of one number-theoretic expansion determine those of another. The proofs are based on general measure-theoretic covering arguments and not on the dynamics of specific maps.