New trans/cis tetrahydroisoquinolines. 1. trans‐2‐benzyl‐3‐(l‐methyl‐1h‐pyrrol‐2‐yl)‐4‐substituted‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinolin‐1‐ones and corresponding tetrahydroisoquinolines

The reaction of homophthalic anhydride and N‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐pyrrol‐2‐yl‐methylidene)‐benzylamine in boiling benzene afforded as a main product the expected substituted trans‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline‐4‐carboxylic acid 5 . The carboxylic group of 5 was transformed in four steps into cyclic amino‐methyl groups yielding numerous new tetrahydroisoquinolinones 11a‐j incorporating a given fragment of pharmacological interest. Reduction of 11a‐j was studied.     

Analogues of α‐Campholenal (= (1R)‐2,2,3‐Trimethylcyclopent‐3‐ene‐1‐acetaldehyde) as Building Blocks for (+)‐β‐Necrodol (= (1S,3S)‐2,2,3‐Trimethyl‐4‐methylenecyclopentanemethanol) and Sandalwood‐like Alcohols

To complete our panorama in structure–activity relationships (SARs) of sandalwood‐like alcohols derived from analogues of α‐campholenal (= (1R)‐2,2,3‐trimethylcyclopent‐3‐ene‐1‐acetaldehyde), we isomerized the epoxy‐isopropyl‐apopinene (?)‐ 2d to the corresponding unreported α‐campholenal analogue (+)‐ 4d (Scheme 1). Derived from the known 3‐demethyl‐α‐campholenal (+)‐ 4a , we prepared the saturated analogue (+)‐ 5a by hydrogenation, while the heterocyclic aldehyde (+)‐ 5b was obtained via a Bayer‐Villiger reaction from the known methyl ketone (+)‐ 6 . Oxidative hydroboration of the known α‐campholenal acetal (?)‐ 8b allowed, after subsequent oxidation of alcohol (+)‐ 9b to ketone (+)‐ 10 , and appropriate alkyl Grignard reaction, access to the 3,4‐disubstituted analogues (+)‐ 4f,g following dehydration and deprotection. (Scheme 2). Epoxidation of either (+)‐ 4b or its methyl ketone (+)‐ 4h , afforded stereoselectively the trans‐epoxy derivatives 11a,b , while the minor cis‐stereoisomer (+)‐ 12a was isolated by chromatography (trans/cis of the epoxy moiety relative to the C₂ or C₃ side chain). Alternatively, the corresponding trans‐epoxy alcohol or acetate 13a,b was obtained either by reduction/esterification from trans‐epoxy aldehyde (+)‐ 11a or by stereoselective epoxidation of the α‐campholenol (+)‐ 15a or of its acetate (?)‐ 15b , respectively. Their cis‐analogues were prepared starting from (+)‐ 12a . Either (+)‐ 4h or (?)‐ 11b , was submitted to a Bayer‐Villiger oxidation to afford acetate (?)‐ 16a . Since isomerizations of (?)‐ 16 lead preferentially to β‐campholene isomers, we followed a known procedure for the isomerization of (?)‐epoxyverbenone (?)‐ 2e to the norcampholenal analogue (+)‐ 19a . Reduction and subsequent protection afforded the silyl ether (?)‐ 19c , which was stereoselectively hydroborated under oxidative condition to afford the secondary alcohol (+)‐ 20c . Further oxidation and epimerization furnished the trans‐ketone (?)‐ 17a , a known intermediate of either (+)‐β‐necrodol (= (+)‐(1S,3S)‐2,2,3‐trimethyl‐4‐methylenecyclopentanemethanol; 17c ) or (+)‐(Z)‐lancifolol (= (1S,3R,4Z)‐2,2,3‐trimethyl‐4‐(4‐methylpent‐3‐enylidene)cyclopentanemethanol). Finally, hydrogenation of (+)‐ 4b gave the saturated cis‐aldehyde (+)‐ 21 , readily reduced to its corresponding alcohol (+)‐ 22a . Similarly, hydrogenation of β‐campholenol (= 2,3,3‐trimethylcyclopent‐1‐ene‐1‐ethanol) gave access via the cis‐alcohol rac‐ 23a , to the cis‐aldehyde rac‐ 24 .     

Synthesis of Novel 3‐(3‐(5‐Methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)‐7H‐[1,2,4]Triazolo [3,4‐b][1,3,4]Thiadiazin‐6‐yl)‐2H‐Chromen‐2‐Ones

A novel series of coumarin substituted triazolo‐thiadiazine derivatives were designed and synthesized by using 5‐methyl isoxazole‐3‐carboxylic acid ( 1 ), thiocarbohydrazide ( 2 ), and various substituted 3‐(2‐bromo acetyl) coumarins ( 4a , 4b , 4c , 4e , 4d , 4f , 4g , 4h , 4i , 4j ). Fusion of 5‐methyl isoxazole‐3‐carboxylic acid with thiocarbohydrazide resulted in the formation of the intermediate 4‐amino‐5‐(5‐methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐thiol ( 3 ). This intermediate on further reaction with substituted 3‐(2‐bromo acetyl) coumarins under simple reaction conditions formed the title products 3‐(3‐(5‐methylisoxazol‐3‐yl)‐7H‐[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4‐b][1,3,4]thiadiazin‐6‐yl‐2H‐chromen‐2‐ones ( 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d , 5e , 5f , 5g , 5h , 5i , 5j ) in good to excellent yields. All the synthesized compounds were well characterized by physical, analytical, and spectroscopic techniques.     

Diastereoselective Electrophilic Amination of Chiral 1‐Benzoyl‐2,3,5,6‐tetrahydro‐3‐methyl‐2‐(1‐methylethyl)pyrimidin‐4(1H)‐one for the Asymmetric Syntheses of α‐Substituted α,β‐Diaminopropanoic Acids

The chiral compounds (R)‐ and (S)‐1‐benzoyl‐2,3,5,6‐tetrahydro‐3‐methyl‐2‐(1‐methylethyl)pyrimidin‐4(1H)‐one ((R)‐ and (S)‐ 1 ), derived from (R)‐ and (S)‐asparagine, respectively, were used as convenient starting materials for the preparation of the enantiomerically pure α‐alkylated (alkyl=Me, Et, Bn) α,β‐diamino acids (R)‐ and (S)‐ 11 – 13 . The chiral lithium enolates of (R)‐ and (S)‐ 1 were first alkylated, and the resulting diasteroisomeric products 5 – 7 were aminated with ‘di(tert‐butyl) azodicarboxylate’ (DBAD), giving rise to the diastereoisomerically pure (≥98%) compounds 8 – 10 . The target compounds (R)‐ and (S)‐ 11 – 13 could then be obtained in good yields and high purities by a hydrolysis/hydrogenolysis/hydrolysis sequence.     

1,5‐Dipolar Electrocyclizations of Thiocarbonyl Ylides Bearing CN Groups: Reactions of N‐[(Dimethylamino)methylene]thiobenzamide and 2‐(Dimethylhydrazono)‐1‐phenylethane‐1‐thione with Diazo Compounds

The reactions of thiobenzamide 8 with diazo compounds proceeded via reactive thiocarbonyl ylides as intermediates, which underwent either a 1,5‐dipolar electrocyclization to give the corresponding five membered heterocycles, i.e., 4‐amino‐4,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐thiazole derivatives (i.e., 10a, 10b, 10c , cis‐ 10d , and trans‐ 10d ) or a 1,3‐dipolar electrocyclization to give the corresponding thiiranes as intermediates, which underwent a S_Ni′‐like ring opening and subsequent 5‐exo‐trig cyclization to yield the isomeric 2‐amino‐2,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐thiazole derivatives (i.e., 11a, 11b, 11c , cis‐ 11d , and trans‐ 11d ). In general, isomer 10 was formed in higher yield than isomer 11 . In the case of the reaction of 8 with diazo(phenyl)methane ( 3d ), a mixture of two pairs of diastereoisomers was formed, of which two, namely cis‐ 10d and trans‐ 10d , could be isolated as pure compounds. The isomers cis‐ 11d and trans‐ 11d remained as a mixture. In the reactions of the thioxohydrazone 9 with diazo compounds 3b and 3d , the main products were the alkenes 18 and 23 , respectively. Their formation was rationalized by a 1,3‐dipolar electrocyclization of the corresponding thiocarbonyl ylide and subsequent desulfurization of the intermediate thiiran. As minor products, 2,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐thiazol‐5‐amines 21 and 24 were obtained, which have been formed by 1,5‐dipolar electrocyclization of the thiocarbonyl ylide, followed by a 1,3‐shift of the dimethylamino group.     

A Convenient Synthetic Route to Spiro[indole‐3,4′‐piperidin]‐2‐ones

Starting from 1‐[(tert‐butoxy)carbonyl]piperidine‐4‐carboxylic acid and 2‐bromoaniline, the spiro[indole‐3,4′‐piperidin]‐2‐one system was obtained in three high‐yielding steps: anilide formation, N(1)‐protection, and intramolecular cyclization under Pd catalysis as the key reaction. The preparation of the corresponding 2‐bromoanilide was studied. In extension, the same sequence was developed with 4‐methyl‐ and 4‐nitro‐2‐bromoaniline. In the key step, the NO₂ group led to a rather diminished yield. The transformation of the protected spiro[indole‐3,4′‐piperidin]‐2‐one to the corresponding unprotected dihydroindoles is discussed.     

Quinolone Analogs 13: Synthesis of Novel 1,1′‐(2‐Methylenepropane‐1,3‐diyl)di(4‐quinolone‐3‐carboxylate) and Related Compounds

The reaction of the 4‐hydroxyquinoline‐3‐carboxylate 6 with pentaerythritol tribromide gave the 1,1′‐(2‐methylenepropane‐1,3‐diyl)di(4‐quinolone‐3‐carboxylate) 11 , whose reaction with bromine afforded the 1,1′‐(2‐bromo‐2‐bromomethylpropane‐1,3‐diyl)di(4‐quinolone‐3‐carboxylate) 12 . Compound 12 was transformed into the (Z)‐1,1′‐(2‐acetoxymethylpropene‐1,3‐diyl)di(4‐quinolone‐3‐carboxylate) 13 or (E)‐1,1′‐[2‐(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)propene‐1,3‐diyl]di(4‐quinolone‐3‐carboxylate) 14 . Hydrolysis of the dimer (Z)‐ 13 or (E)‐ 14 with potassium hydroxide provided the (E)‐1,1′‐(2‐hydroxymethylpropene‐1,3‐diyl)di(4‐quinolone‐3‐carboxylic acid) 15 or (Z)‐1,1′‐[2‐(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)propene‐1,3‐diyl]di(4‐quinolone‐3‐carboxylic acid) 16 , respectively. The nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectral data supported that those hydrolysis resulted in the geometrical conversion of (Z)‐ 13 into (E)‐ 15 or (E)‐ 14 into (Z)‐ 16 .     

An efficient synthesis of 5‐aryl‐4,5‐dihydro‐3‐(5‐methyl‐1‐p‐tolyl‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)‐1‐(4‐phenylthiazol‐2‐yl)pyrazoles

Some new target products 5‐aryl‐4,5‐dihydro‐3‐(5‐methyl‐1‐p‐tolyl‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)‐1‐(4‐phenylthiazol‐2‐yl)pyrazoles 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d , 5e , 5f , 5g , 5h , 5i , 5j have been synthesized by reaction of 2‐bromo‐1‐phenylethanone and compounds 4a , 4b , 4c , 4d , 4e , 4f , 4g , 4h , 4i , 4j which were prepared from the combination of thiosemicarbazide and (E)‐3‐aryl‐1‐(5‐methyl‐1‐p‐tolyl‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)‐prop‐2‐en‐1‐ones 3a , 3b , 3c , 3d , 3e , 3f , 3g , 3h , 3i , 3j . All the structures were established by MS, IR, CHN, and ¹H NMR spectra data. Synthesis of structure diversity is applied. J. Heterocyclic Chem., (2011).     

Highly Efficient Regio- and Stereoselective Synthesis of β-（1 →6）-Branched β-（1 →3）-Linked Glucohexaose and Its Analogue

A β-（1→）6）-branched β-（1→）3）-linked glucohexaose （1） and its lauryl glycoside （2）, present in many biologically active polysaccharides from traditional herbal medicines such as Ganoderma lucidum, Schizophyllum commune and Lentinus edodes, were highly efficiently synthesized. Coupling of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl- （1--）3）-2-O-benzoyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-a-D-glucopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate （7） with 3,6-branched acceptors 8 and 12 gave β-（1→）3）-linked pentasaccharides （9） and （13）, then via simple chemical transformation 4＇,6＇-OH pentasaccharide acceptors 10 and 14 were obtained. Regio- and stereoselective coupling of 3 with 10 and 14 gave β-（1→）3）-linked hexasaccharides （11） and （15） as the major products. Deprotection of 11 and 15 provided the target sugar 1 and 2. Thus, a new method for the preparation of this kind of compounds was developed.     

Synthesis of an Enantiomerically Pure 1,3‐Thiazole‐5(4H)‐thione and Its Stereoselective 1,3‐Dipolar Cycloaddition with an Azomethine Ylide

Starting from the enantiomerically pure 2H‐azirin‐3‐amines (R,S)‐ 4 and (S,S)‐ 4 , the enantiomeric, optically active 4‐benzyl‐4‐methyl‐2‐phenyl‐1,3‐thiazole‐5(4H)‐thiones (R)‐ 1 and (S)‐ 1 , respectively, have been prepared (Schemes 2 and 3). In each case, the reaction of 1 with N‐(benzylidene)[(trimethylsilyl)methyl]amine ( 2 ) in HMPA in the presence of CsF and trimethylsilyl triflate gave a mixture of four optically active spirocyclic cycloadducts (Scheme 4). Separation by preparative HPLC yielded two pure diastereoisomers, e.g., (4R,5R,9S)‐ 10 and (4R,5R,9R)‐ 10 . The regioisomeric compounds 11 were obtained as a mixture of diastereoisomers. The products were formed by a 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition of 1 with in situ generated azomethine ylide 3 , which attacks 1 stereoselectively from the sterically less‐hindered side, i.e., with (R)‐ 1 the attack occurs from the re‐side and in the case of (S)‐ 1 from the si‐side.     

Synthesis and conversion of 2‐(pyrazol‐1‐yl)quinoxaline 4‐oxides

The reaction of 6‐chloro‐2‐hydrazinoquinoxaline 4‐oxide 1b with acetylacetone or benzoylacetone gave 6‐chloro‐2‐(3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐i‐yl)quinoxaline 4‐oxide 5a or 6‐chloro‐2‐(3‐methyl‐5‐phenylpyrazol‐1‐yl)quinoxaline 4‐oxide 5b , respXectively. Compound 5a or 5b was converted into the pyrrolo[1,5‐a]quinoxaline 6a or 6b , triazolo[4,3‐a]quinoxaline 9a or 9b , and tetrazolo[1,5‐a]quinoxaline 10.     

Regioselective 1,3‐Dipolar Cycloadditions of (1Z)‐1‐(Arylmethylidene)‐5,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxopyrazolidin‐1‐ium‐2‐ide Azomethine Imines to Acetylenic Dipolarophiles

The 5,5‐dimethylpyrazolidin‐3‐one ( 4 ), prepared from ethyl 3‐methylbut‐2‐enoate ( 3 ) and hydrazine hydrate, was treated with various substituted benzaldehydes 5a – i to give the corresponding (1Z)‐1‐(arylmethylidene)‐5,5‐dimethyl‐3‐oxopyrazolidin‐1‐ium‐2‐ide azomethine imines 6a – i . The 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition reactions of azomethine imines 6a – h with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (=dimethyl but‐2‐ynedioate; 7 ) afforded the corresponding dimethyl pyrazolo[1,2‐a]pyrazoledicarboxylates 8a – h , while by cycloaddition of 6 with methyl propiolate (=methyl prop‐2‐ynoate; 9 ), regioisomeric methyl pyrazolo[1,2‐a]pyrazolemonocarboxylates 10 and 11 were obtained. The regioselectivity of cycloadditions of azomethine imines 6a – i with methyl propiolate ( 9 ) was influenced by the substituents on the aryl residue. Thus, azomethine imines 6a – e derived from benzaldehydes 5a – e with a single substituent or without a substituent at the ortho‐positions in the aryl residue, led to mixtures of regioisomers 10a – e and 11a – e . Azomethine imines 6f – i derived from 2,6‐disubstituted benzaldehydes 5f – i gave single regioisomers 10f – i .     

A Facile and Simple Synthesis of Novel 2‐(substituted)‐5‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐indazol‐3‐yl)‐Oxazole Derivatives

Novel 2‐(substituted)‐5‐(1‐methyl‐1H‐indazol‐3‐yl)‐oxazoles ( 13 ) were synthesized in moderate yields, from 1‐methyl‐1H‐Indazole 3‐carboxylic acid ( 1 ), by converting it into a variety of amides ( 12 ) and further its heterocyclization. The structures of all the compounds have been elucidated on the basis of IR, ¹H‐NMR, and HRMS.     

Synthesis of Cyclopenta[b]indol‐1‐ones and Carbazol‐4‐ones from N‐(2‐Halophenyl)‐Substituted Enaminones by Intramolecular Heck Reaction

An efficient synthetic route towards N‐methylated or nonmethylated 3,4‐dihydrocyclopent[b]indol‐1(2H)‐ones ( 3 ) and 1,2,3,9‐tetrahydrocarbazol‐4(4H)‐one ( 10 ) was elaborated, based on Pd‐catalyzed intramolecular Heck reaction. The chemoselectivity of the cyclization was studied in the case of the bi‐ and trifunctional substrates 12 and 17 , respectively. In the latter case, depending on the catalyst, either the brominated indole 18 or the tetracyclic compound 19 were obtained by single and double Heck reaction, respectively.     

Synthesis of 1‐Methyl‐3‐aryl‐substituted Titanocene and Zirconocene Dichlorides and Crystal Structure of Bis[η5‐1‐methyl‐3‐(α, α‐dimethylbenzyl) cyclopentadienyl] titanium Dichloride

The syntheses of a series of l‐methyl‐3‐aryl‐substituted titanocene and zirconocene dichlorides are reported. These complexes are synthesized by the reaction of 2‐ and 3‐methyl‐6, 6‐dimethylfulvenes (1:4) with aryllithium, followed by the reaction with TiCl₄·2THF, ZrCl₄ and (CpTiCl₂)₂O respectively, to give complexes 1–5. The complex [η⁵‐1‐methyl‐3‐(α, α‐dimethylbenzyl) cyclopentadienyl] titanium dichloride has been studied by X‐ray diffraction. The red crystal of this complex is monoclinic, space group P2_t/C with unit cell parameters: a =6.973(6) × 10^?1 nm, b =36.91(2) × 10^?1 nm, c = 10.063(4) × 10^?1 nm, α=β= γ = 93.35(5)°, V = 2584(5) × 10^?3 nm³ and Z = 4. Refinement for 1004 observed reflections gives the final R of 0.088. There are four independent molecules per unit cell.     

Diastereo‐ and Enantioselective Intramolecular [2+2] Photocycloaddition Reactions of 3‐(ω′‐Alkenyl)‐ and 3‐(ω′‐Alkenyloxy)‐Substituted 5,6‐Dihydro‐1H‐pyridin‐2‐ones

3‐(ω′‐Alkenyl)‐substituted 5,6‐dihydro‐1H‐pyridin‐2‐ones 2 – 4 were prepared as photocycloaddition precursors either by cross‐coupling from 3‐iodo‐5,6‐dihydro‐1H‐pyridin‐2‐one ( 8 ) or—more favorably—from the corresponding α‐(ω′‐alkenyl)‐substituted δ‐valerolactams 9 – 11 by a selenylation/elimination sequence (56–62 % overall yield). 3‐(ω′‐Alkenyloxy)‐substituted 5,6‐dihydro‐1H‐pyridin‐2‐ones 5 and 6 were accessible in 43 and 37 % overall yield from 3‐diazopiperidin‐2‐one ( 15 ) by an α,α‐chloroselenylation reaction at the 3‐position followed by nucleophilic displacement of a chloride ion with an ω‐alkenolate and oxidative elimination of selenoxide. Upon irradiation at λ=254 nm, the precursor compounds underwent a clean intramolecular [2+2] photocycloaddition reaction. Substrates 2 and 5 , tethered by a two‐atom chain, exclusively delivered the respective crossed products 19 and 20 , and substrates 3 , 5 , and 6 , tethered by longer chains, gave the straight products 21 – 23 . The completely regio‐ and diastereoselective photocycloaddition reactions proceeded in 63–83 % yield. Irradiation in the presence of the chiral templates (?)‐ 1 and (+)‐ 31 at ?75 °C in toluene rendered the reactions enantioselective with selectivities varying between 40 and 85 % ee. Truncated template rac‐ 31 was prepared as a noranalogue of the well‐established template 1 in eight steps and 56 % yield from the Kemp triacid ( 24 ). Subsequent resolution delivered the enantiomerically pure templates (?)‐ 31 and (+)‐ 31 . The outcome of the reactions is compared to the results achieved with 4‐substituted 5,6‐dihydro‐1H‐pyridin‐2‐ones and quinolones.     

New Rh(III) complexes of 5‐methyl‐5‐(pyridyl)‐2,4‐imidazolidenedione: Synthesis,X‐ray structure,electrochemical study and catalytic behaviour for hydrogenation of ketones

We describe the reaction of anion [RhCl₆]³⁻ with a series of hydantoin ligands (HL1, HL2 and HL3 = 5‐methyl‐5‐(2‐, 3‐ and 4‐pyridyl)‐2,4‐imidazolidenedione, respectively). Based on spectroscopic, cyclic voltammetric, elemental and MS analyses, the complexes have the general formula K[RhCl₂(L1)₂] ( 1 ), cis ‐ and trans ‐K[RhCl₄(HL2)₂] ( 2a and 2b ) and cis ‐ and trans ‐K[RhCl₄(HL3)₂] ( 3a and 3b ). Complexes 2a , 2b , 3a and 3b were characterized successfully using infrared, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectral analyses. Dissolution of complex 1 in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) led to elimination of one KL1 ligand and coordination of two DMSO molecules as ligands and transformation of this complex to cis ‐ and trans ‐[RhCl₂L1(DMSO)₂] ( 1a and 1b ). Recrystallization led to separation and isolation of crystals of 1a from the initial mixture. X‐ray analysis results showed that this complex was crystallized as solvated complex cis ‐[RhCl₂L1(DMSO)₂]DMSO. The catalytic activity of these complexes was then evaluated for the hydrogenation of various ketones.     

Design and Synthesis of Novel 6‐(5‐Methyl‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)‐5‐[(2‐(thiazol‐2‐yl)hydrazono)methyl]imidazo[2,1‐b]thiazoles as Antimicrobial Agents

Novel 6‐(1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)‐5‐[(2‐(thiazol‐2‐yl)hydrazono)methyl]imidazo[2,1‐b ]thiazoles 7 , 9a , 9b , 9c , 9d , and 11 were prepared by reaction of thiosemicarbazone 5a , 5b with either hydrazonoyl chloride 6 , phenacylbromides 8 or 2‐bromo‐1‐(5‐methyl‐1‐p‐tolyl‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)ethanone 10 respectively. The new products were tested for their antimicrobial activities using 96‐well micro‐plate assay, and compound 7 showed excellent antibacterial activities compared with Vancomycine (reference drugs), while compounds 5b and 9c exhibited good results against yeast. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined, and compound 7 showed the lowest MIC against Gram positive bacteria while compound 5b showed the lowest MIC against yeast.     

Diels‐alder reactions of 2‐(2‐nitroethenyl)‐1H‐pyrroles and their oxygen and sulfur analogs with quinones

Diels‐Alder reaction of 2‐(E‐2‐nitroethenyl)‐1H‐pyrrole ( 2a ) with 1,4‐benzoquinone gave the desired benzo[e]indole‐6, 9(3H)‐dione ( 4a ) in 10% yield versus a 26% yield (lit. 86% [5]) of the known N‐methyl compound ( 4b ) from the N‐(or 1)‐methyl compound ( 2b ). Protection of the nitrogen of 2a with a phenylsul‐fonyl group ( 2c ) gave a 9% yield of the corresponding N‐(or 3)‐phenylsulfonyl compound ( 4c ). The reaction of 2b with 1,4‐naphthoquinone gave in 6% yield (lit. 64% [5]) the known 3‐methylnaphtho[2,3‐e]‐indole‐6, 9(3H)‐dione ( 6 ). The reaction of 2‐(E‐2‐nitroethenyl)furan ( 8a ) gave a small yield of the desired naphtho[2,1‐b]furan‐6, 9‐dione ( 9a ), recognized by comparing its NMR spectrum with that of 4b. The corresponding reaction of 2‐(E‐2‐nitroethenyl)thiophene ( 8b ) gave a 4% yield of naphtho[2,1‐ b ]thiophene‐6,9‐dione ( 9b ), previously prepared in 24% yield [12] in a three‐step procedure involving 2‐ethenylthiophene. Introducing an electron‐releasing 2‐methyl substituent into 8a and 8b gave 12a and 12b , which, upon reaction with 1,4‐benzoquinone, gave 2‐methylnaphtho[2,1‐b]furan‐6, 9‐dione ( 13a ) and its sulfur analog ( 13b ) in yields of 4 and 8%, respectively.     

An Efficient Synthesis of 3‐(3‐benzyl‐2‐(phenylimino)‐2,3‐dihydrothiazol‐4‐yl)‐6‐methyl‐4‐(2‐oxo‐2‐phenylethoxy)‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐pyran‐2‐one Derivatives via Multi‐Component Approach

An easy, highly efficient and a new convenient one‐pot, two‐step approach to the synthesis of 3‐(3‐benzyl‐2‐(phenylimino)‐2,3‐dihydrothiazol‐4‐yl)‐6‐methyl‐4‐(2‐oxo‐2‐phenylethoxy)‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐pyran‐2‐one is described. These compounds were synthesized from 3‐(3‐benzyl‐2‐(phenylimino)‐2,3‐dihydrothiazol‐4‐yl)‐4‐hydroxy‐6‐methyl‐3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐pyran‐2‐one and α‐bromoketones in good yields. The compounds 4 were synthesized by a multi‐component reaction between 1 , 2 , and 3 and the prominent features of this protocol are mild reaction conditions, operation simplicity, and good to high yields of products.