ContributionsUpper domination and upper irredundance perfect graphs

Let β(G), Γ(G) and IR(G) be the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number, respectively. A graph G is calledΓ-perfect if β(H) = Γ(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. A graph G is called IR-perfect if Γ(H) = IR(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. In this paper, we present a characterization of Γ-perfect graphs in terms of a family of forbidden induced subgraphs, and show that the class of Γ-perfect graphs is a subclass of IR-perfect graphs and that the class of absorbantly perfect graphs is a subclass of Γ-perfect graphs. These results imply a number of known theorems on Γ-perfect graphs and IR-perfect graphs. Moreover, we prove a sufficient condition for a graph to be Γ-perfect and IR-perfect which improves a known analogous result.     

Subgraph distances in graphs defined by edge transfers

For two edge-induced subgraphs F and H of the same size in a graph G, the subgraph H can be obtained from F by an edge jump if there exist four distinct vertices u, v, w, and x in G such that uv ε E(F), wx ε E(G) - E(F), and H = F - uv + wx. The subgraph F is j-transformed into H if H can be obtained from F by a sequence of edge jumps. Necessary and sufficient conditions are presented for a graph G to have the property that every edge-induced subgraph of a fixed size in G can be j-transformed into every other edge-induced subgraph of that size. The minimum number of edge jumps required to transform one subgraph into another is called the jump distance. This distance is a metric and can be modeled by a graph. The jump graph J(G) of a graph G is defined as that graph whose vertices are the edges of G and where two vertices of J(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G are independent. For a given graph G, we consider the sequence {{J^k(G)}} of iterated jump graphs and classify each graph as having a convergent, divergent, or terminating sequence.     

On the minor-minimal 2-connected graphs having a fixed minor

Let H be a graph with κ₁ components and κ₂ blocks, and let G be a minor-minimal 2-connected graph having H as a minor. This paper proves that |E(G)|−|E(H)|(κ₁−1)+β(κ₂−1) for all (,β) such that +β5,2+5β20, and β3. Moreover, if one of the last three inequalities fails, then there are graphs G and H for which the first inequality fails.     

Compatibilité entre structures d''intervalles et relations d''orde

Compatibility between interval structures and partial orderings.

If H=(X,E) is a hypergraph, n the cardinality of X,I_n the ordered set {1..n} and < an order relation on X, we call F(X,<) the set of the one-to-one functions from X to I_n which are compatible with <. If AI_n we denote by (A) the length of the smallest interval of I_n which contains A.

We first deal with the following problem: Find ƒF(X,<) which minimise . The a_e, eR are positive coefficients.

This problem can be understood as a scheduling problem and is checked to be NP-complete. We learn how to recognize in polynomial time those hypergraphs H=(X,E) which induce an optimal value of z min equal to .

Next we work on a dual question which arises about interval graphs, when some partial orderings on the vertex set of these graphs intend to represent inclusion, overlapping or anteriority relations between closed intervals of the real line.     

On the planarity of jump graphs

For a graph G of size m1 and edge-induced subgraphs F and H of size k (1km), the subgraph H is said to be obtained from F by an edge jump if there exist four distinct vertices u,v,w, and x in G such that uvE(F), wxE(G)−E(F), and H=F−uv+wx. The minimum number of edge jumps required to transform F into H is the k-jump distance from F to H. For a graph G of size m1 and an integer k with 1km, the k-jump graph J_k(G) is that graph whose vertices correspond to the edge-induced subgraphs of size k of G and where two vertices of J_k(G) are adjacent if and only if the k-jump distance between the corresponding subgraphs is 1. All connected graphs G for which J₂(G) is planar are determined.     

Linear mappings which are rank-k nonincreasing, II

We prove the following result. Let F be an infinite field of characteristic other than two. Let k be a positive integer. Let S_n(F) denote the space of all n × n symmetric matrices with entries in F, and let T:S_n(F)→S_n(F) be a linear operator. Suppose that T is rank-k nonincreasing and its image contains a matrix with rank higher than K. Then, there exist λεF and PεF^n,n such that T(A)=λPAP^t for all AεS_n(F). λ can be chosen to be 1 if F is algebraically closed and ±1 if F=R, the real field.     

Convexoid and generalized derivations

Let E,F be two Banach spaces and let S be a symmetric norm ideal of L(E,F). For AL(F) and BL(E) the generalized derivation δ_S,A,B is the operator on S that sends X to AX−XB. A bounded linear operator is said to be convexoid if its (algebraic) numerical range coincides with the convex hull of its spectrum. We show that δ_S,A,B is convexoid if and only if A and B are convexoid.     

Harary's conjectures on integral sum graphs

Let N denote the set of positive integers and Z denote all integers. The (integral) sum graph of a finite subset S N(Z) is the graph (S, E) with uv ε E if and only if u + v ε S. A graph G is said to be an (integral) sum graph if it is isomorphic to the (integral) sum graph of some S N(Z). The (integral) sum number of a given graph G is the smallest number of isolated nodes which when added to G result in an (integral) sum graph.

We show that the integral sum number of a complete graph with n 4 nodes equals 2n − 3, which proves a conjecture of Harary. And we disprove another conjecture of Harary by showing that there are infinitely many trees which are not caterpillars but are integral sum graphs.     

The chromatic difference sequence of the Cartesian product of graphs

The chromatic difference sequence cds(G) of a graph G with chromatic number n is defined by cds(G) = (a(1), a(2),…, a(n)) if the sum of a(1), a(2),…, a(t) is the maximum number of vertices in an induced t-colorable subgraph of G for t = 1, 2,…, n. The Cartesian product of two graphs G and H, denoted by G□H, has the vertex set V(G□H = V(G) x V(H) and its edge set is given by (x₁, y₁)(x₂, y₂) ε E(G□H) if either x₁ = x₂ and y₁ y₂ ε E(H) or y₁ = y₂ and x₁x₂ ε E(G).

We obtained four main results: the cds of the product of bipartite graphs, the cds of the product of graphs with cds being nondrop flat and first-drop flat, the non-increasing theorem for powers of graphs and cds of powers of circulant graphs.     

Some algebraic constructions in rational homotopy theory

In this note we describe constructions in the category of differential graded commutative algebras over the rational numbers Q which are analogs of the space F(X, Y) of continuous maps of X to Y, the component F(X, Y,ƒ) containing ƒ ε F(X, Y), fibrations, induced fibrations, the space Γ(π) of sections of a fibration π: E → X, and the component Γ(π,σ) containing σ ε Γ (π). As a focus, we address the problem of expressing π^*(F(X, Y, ƒ)) = Hom(π_*(F(X,Y, ƒ)),Q) in terms of differential graded algebra models for X and Y.     

A Note on Asymptotic Class Number Upper Bounds in p-adic Lie Extensions

Let p be an odd prime and F_∞ a p-adic Lie extension of a number field F with Galois group G. Suppose that G is a compact pro-p p-adic Lie group with no torsion and that it contains a closed normal subgroup H such that G/H ≅Z_p. Under various assumptions, we establish asymptotic upper bounds for the growth of p-exponents of the class groups in the said p-adic Lie extension. Our results generalize a previous result of Lei, where he established such an estimate under the assumption that H ≅Z_p.     

Some results on integral sum graphs

Let Z denote the set of all integers. The integral sum graph of a finite subset S of Z is the graph (S,E) with vertex set S and edge set E such that for u,vS, uvE if and only if u+vS. A graph G is called an integral sum graph if it is isomorphic to the integral sum graph of some finite subset S of Z. The integral sum number of a given graph G, denoted by ζ(G), is the smallest number of isolated vertices which when added to G result in an integral sum graph. Let x denote the least integer not less than the real x. In this paper, we (i) determine the value of ζ(K_n−E(K_r)) for r2n/3−1, (ii) obtain a lower bound for ζ(K_n−E(K_r)) when 2r<2n/3−1 and n5, showing by construction that the bound is sharp when r=2, and (iii) determine the value of ζ(K_r,r) for r2. These results provide partial solutions to two problems posed by Harary (Discrete Math. 124 (1994) 101–108). Finally, we furnish a counterexample to a result on the sum number of K_r,s given by Hartsfiedl and Smyth (Graphs and Matrices, R. Rees (Ed.), Marcel, Dekker, New York, 1992, pp. 205–211).     

Bandwidth of the composition of two graphs

The bandwidth B(G) of a graph G is the minimum of the quantity max{|f(x)−f(y)| : xyE(G)} taken over all proper numberings f of G. The composition of two graphs G and H, written as G[H], is the graph with vertex set V(G)×V(H) and with (u₁,v₁) is adjacent to (u₂,v₂) if either u₁ is adjacent to u₂ in G or u₁=u₂ and v₁ is adjacent to v₂ in H. In this paper, we investigate the bandwidth of the composition of two graphs. Let G be a connected graph. We denote the diameter of G by D(G). For two distinct vertices x,yV(G), we define w_G(x,y) as the maximum number of internally vertex-disjoint (x,y)-paths whose lengths are the distance between x and y. We define w(G) as the minimum of w_G(x,y) over all pairs of vertices x,y of G with the distance between x and y is equal to D(G). Let G be a non-complete connected graph and let H be any graph. Among other results, we prove that if |V(G)|=B(G)D(G)−w(G)+2, then B(G[H])=(B(G)+1)|V(H)|−1. Moreover, we show that this result determines the bandwidth of the composition of some classes of graphs composed with any graph.     

Bounds on the number of isolates in sum graph labeling

A simple undirected graph H is called a sum graph if there is a labeling L of the vertices of H into distinct positive integers such that any two vertices u and v of H are adjacent if and only if there is a vertex w with label L(w)=L(u)+L(v). The sum number σ(G) of a graph G=(V,E) is the least integer r such that the graph H consisting of G and r isolated vertices is a sum graph. It is clear that σ(G)|E|. In this paper, we discuss general upper and lower bounds on the sum number. In particular, we prove that, over all graphs G=(V,E) with fixed |V|3 and |E|, the average of σ(G) is at least

Full-size image

. In other words, for most graphs, σ(G)Ω(|E|).     

Different and trace

Let E/F be a finite separable field extension and suppose given a discrete valuation on F that has a unique extension to E. We prove the relation d = e − 1 + c, where d is the differential exponent, e the ramification and c the trace contraction.     

On an explicit formula for the distribution of the supremum

Let M_∞ be the supremum of a random walk drifting to -∞ which is generated by the partial sums of a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables with a common distribution F. We prove that the moment generating function E exp(sM_∞) is a rational function if and only if the function ∫₀^∞ exp(sx)F(dx) is rational.     

Eulerian subgraphs containing given edges

For an integer l0, define to be the family of graphs such that if and only if for any edge subset XE(G) with |X|l, G has a spanning eulerian subgraph H with XE(H). The graphs in are known as supereulerian graphs. Let f(l) be the minimum value of k such that every k-edge-connected graph is in . Jaeger and Catlin independently proved f(0)=4. We shall determine f(l) for all values of l0. Another problem concerning the existence of eulerian subgraphs containing given edges is also discussed, and former results in [J. Graph Theory 1 (1977) 79–84] and [J. Graph Theory 3 (1979) 91–93] are extended.     

Random packing by ρ-connected ρ-regular graphs

A graph G is packable by the graph F if its edges can be partitioned into copies of F. If deleting the edges of any F-packable subgraph from G leaves an F-packable graph, then G is randomly F-packable. If G is F-packable but not randomly F-packable then G is F-forbidden. The minimal F-forbidden graphs provide a characterization of randomly F-packable graphs. We show that for each ρ-connected ρ-regular graph F with ρ > 1, there is a set (F) of minimal F-forbidden graphs of a simple form, such that any other minimal F-forbidden graph can be obtained from a graph in (F) by a process of identifying vertices and removing copies of F. When F is a connected strongly edge-transitive graph having more than one edge (such as a cycle or hypercube), there is only one graph in (F).     

The reduction of graph families closed under contraction

Let be a family of graphs. Suppose there is a nontrivial graph H such that for any supergraph G of H, G is in if and only if the contraction G/H is in . Examples of such an : graphs with a spanning closed trail; graphs with at least k edge-disjoint spanning trees; and k-edge-connected graphs (k fixed). We give a reduction method using contractions to find when a given graph is in and to study its structure if it is not in . This reduction method generalizes known special cases.