S-Noetherian properties on amalgamated algebras along an ideal

Let A and B   be commutative rings with identity, f:A→B$f:A\to B$ a ring homomorphism and J an ideal of B  . Then the subring A?^fJ:={(a,f(a)+j)|a∈A and j∈J}$A{?}^{f}J:=\{(a,f(a)+j)|a\in A\text{and}j\in J\}$ of A×B$A\times B$ is called the amalgamation of A with B along with J with respect to f. In this paper, we investigate a general concept of the Noetherian property, called the S  -Noetherian property which was introduced by Anderson and Dumitrescu, on the ring A?^fJ$A{?}^{f}J$ for a multiplicative subset S   of A?^fJ$A{?}^{f}J$. As particular cases of the amalgamation, we also devote to study the transfers of the S  -Noetherian property to the constructions D+(_X1,…,_Xn)E[_X1,…,_Xn]$D+(X_1,\dots ,X_n)E[X_1,\dots ,X_n]$ and D+(_X1,…,_Xn)E?_X1,…,_Xn?$D+(X_1,\dots ,X_n)E?X_1,\dots ,X_n?$ and Nagata?s idealization.     

Finite p-Groups in Which Each Central Automorphism Fixes Centre Elementwise

Let A and B be commutative rings with unity, f: A → B a ring homomorphism, and J an ideal of B. Then the subring A ?^fJ: = {(a, f(a) + j)|a ∈ A and j ∈ J} of A × B is called the amalgamation of A with B along J with respect to f. In this article, among other things, we investigate the Cohen–Macaulay and (quasi-)Gorenstein properties on the ring A ?^fJ.     

On Strong (A)-Rings

In this paper, we introduce a strong property (A) as follows: A ring R is called satisfying strong property (A) if every finitely generated ideal of R which is generated by a finite number of zero-divisors elements of R, has a non zero annihilator. We study the transfer of property (A) and strong property (A) in trivial ring extensions and amalgamated duplication of a ring along an ideal. We also exhibit a class of rings which satisfy property (A) and do not satisfy strong property (A).     

On Smital properties

Let A be an algebra and J⊂A an ideal of subsets of a group 〈X,+〉 with an invariant topology τ. We say that a triple 〈A,J,τ〉 has the Smital property if, for any set A∈A?J and any set D dense in τ, the set c(A+D) belongs to J. In the paper we compare this property and similar ones with the well-known Steinhaus type properties. We consider several weak and strong versions of Smital properties.     

On the multiplicity and the Cohen-Macaulayness of fiber cones of graded algebras

Let A be a Noetherian local ring with the maximal ideal m and an m-primary ideal J. Let S=?_n≥0S_n be a finitely generated standard graded algebra over A. Set S⁺=?_n>0S_n. Denote by F_J(S)=?_n≥0→(S_n/JS_n) the fiber cone of S with respect to J. The paper characterizes the multiplicity and the Cohen-Macaulayness of F_J(S) in terms of minimal reductions of S⁺.     

Duplication of a module along an ideal

Let A be a commutative ring and I an ideal of A. The amalgamated duplication of A along I, denoted by \({A \bowtie I}\) , is the special subring of \({A \times A}\) defined by \({A \bowtie I } := \pi \times_{\frac{A}{I}} \pi = \{(a, a + i) \mid a \in A, i \in I\}\) . We are interested in some basic and homological properties of a special kind of \({A \bowtie I}\) -modules, called the duplication of M along I with M is an A-module, and defined by \({M \bowtie I := \{(m, m') \in M \times M \mid m - m^{\prime} \in IM\}}\) . The new results generalize some results on amalgamated duplication of a ring along an ideal.     

Power integral bases for Selmer-like number fields

The Selmer trinomials are the trinomials f(X)∈{Xn−X−1,Xn+X+1|n>1 is an integer} over Z. For these trinomials we show that the ideal C=(f(X),f^′(X))Z[X] has height two and contains the linear polynomial (n−1)X+n. We then give several necessary and sufficient conditions for D[X]/(f(X)D[X]) to be a regular ring, where f(X) is an arbitrary polynomial over a Dedekind domain D such that its ideal C has height two and contains a product of primitive linear polynomials. We next specialize to the Selmer-like trinomials bXn+cX+d and bXn+cXn−1+d over D and give several more such necessary and sufficient conditions (among them is that C is a radical ideal). We then specialize to the Selmer trinomials over Z and give quite a few more such conditions (among them is that the discriminant Disc(Xn−X−1)=±(nn−(1−n)ⁿ⁻¹) of Xn−X−1 is square-free (respectively Disc(Xn+X+1)=±(nn+(1−n)ⁿ⁻¹) of Xn+X+1 is square-free)). Finally, we show that nn+(1−n)ⁿ⁻¹ is never square-free when n≡2 (mod 3) and n>2, but, otherwise, both are very often (but not always) square-free.     

The multiplicity and the Cohen-Macaulayness of extended Rees algebras of equimultiple ideals

Let I be an equimultiple ideal of Noetherian local ring A. This paper gives some multiplicity formulas of the extended Rees algebras T=A[It,t^-1]. In the case A generalized Cohen-Macaulay, we determine when T is Cohen-Macaulay and as an immediate consequence we obtain e.g., some criteria for the Cohen-Macaulayness of Rees algebra R(I) over a Cohen-Macaulay ring in terms of reduction numbers and ideals.     

Hereditary invertible linear surjections and splitting problems for selections

Let A+B be the pointwise (Minkowski) sum of two convex subsets A and B of a Banach space. Is it true that every continuous mapping h:X→A+B splits into a sum h=f+g of continuous mappings f:X→A and g:X→B? We study this question within a wider framework of splitting techniques of continuous selections. Existence of splittings is guaranteed by hereditary invertibility of linear surjections between Banach spaces. Some affirmative and negative results on such invertibility with respect to an appropriate class of convex compacta are presented. As a corollary, a positive answer to the above question is obtained for strictly convex finite-dimensional precompact spaces.     

Positivity and Convexity in Rings of Fractions

Given a commutative ring A equipped with a preordering A⁺ (in the most general sense, see below), we look for a fractional ring extension (= “ring of quotients” in the sense of Lambek et al. [L]) as big as possible such that A⁺ extends to a preordering R⁺ of R (i.e. with A ∩ R⁺ = A⁺) in a natural way. We then ask for subextensions A ⊂ B of A ⊂ R such that A is convex in B with respect to B⁺ : = B ∩ R⁺. Supported by DFG. A short form of this article has been delivered at the conference Carthapos 2006 at Carthago (Tunisia).     

Non-commutative operator Bohr inequality

It is shown that if A, B, X are Hilbert space operators such that X?γI, for the positive real number γ, and p,q>1 with 1/p+1/q=1, then |A−B|²?p|A|²+q|B|² with equality if and only if (1−p)A=B and γ||||A−B|²|||?|||p|A|²X+qX|B|²||| for every unitarily invariant norm. Moreover, if in addition A, B are normal and X is any Hilbert-Schmidt operator, then ‖δ_A,B²(X)‖₂?‖p|A|²X+qX|B|²‖₂ with equality if and only if (1−p)AX=XB.     

Semisimilarity for matrices over a division ring

Two square matrices A and B over a ring R are semisimilar, written A$\text{?}$B, if YAX=B and XBY=A for some (possibly rectangular) matrices X, Y over R. We show that if A and B have the same dimension, and if the ring is a division ring $\text{D}$, then A$\text{?}$B if and only if A² is similar to B² and rank(A^k)=rank(B^k), k=1,2,…     

On the topology of valuation-theoretic representations of integrally closed domains

Let F be a field. For each nonempty subset X of the Zariski–Riemann space of valuation rings of F, let $A(X)={?}_{V\in X}V$ and $J(X)={?}_{V\in X}{\mathfrak{M}}_V$, where ${\mathfrak{M}}_V$ denotes the maximal ideal of V. We examine connections between topological features of X and the algebraic structure of the ring $A(X)$. We show that if $J(X)\ne 0$ and $A(X)$ is a completely integrally closed local ring that is not a valuation ring of F, then there is a space Y of valuation rings of F that is perfect in the patch topology such that $A(X)=A(Y)$. If any countable subset of points is removed from Y, then the resulting set remains a representation of $A(X)$. Additionally, if F is a countable field, the set Y can be chosen homeomorphic to the Cantor set. We apply these results to study properties of the ring $A(X)$ with specific focus on topological conditions that guarantee $A(X)$ is a Prüfer domain, a feature that is reflected in the Zariski–Riemann space when viewed as a locally ringed space. We also classify the rings $A(X)$ where X has finitely many patch limit points, thus giving a topological generalization of the class of Krull domains, one that includes interesting Prüfer domains. To illustrate the latter, we show how an intersection of valuation rings arising naturally in the study of local quadratic transformations of a regular local ring can be described using these techniques.     

Relative uniform completeness and order-convex representations of archimedean ?-groups and f-rings

Results of Henriksen and Johnson, for archimedean f-rings with identity, and of Aron and Hager, for archimedean ?-groups with unit, relating uniform completeness to order-convexity of a representation in a D(X) (the lattice of almost real continuous functions on the space X) are extended to situations without identity or unit. For an archimedean ?-group, G, we show: if G admits any representation G?D(X) in which G is order-convex, then G is divisible and relatively uniformly complete. A converse to this would seem to require some sort of canonical representation of G, which seems not to exist in the ?-group case. But for a reduced archimedean f-ring, A, there is the Johnson representation A?D(XA), and we show: A is divisible, relatively uniformly complete and square-dominated if and only if A is order-convex in D(XA) and square-root-closed. Also, we expand on the situation with unit, where we have the Yosida representation, G?D(YG): if G is divisible, relatively uniformly complete, and the unit is a near unit, then G is order-convex in D(YG).     

Corrigendum to “New algebraic properties of an amalgamated algebra along an ideal”

At some point, after publication, we realized that Proposition 4.1(2) and Theorem 4.4 in [2 D’Anna, M., Finocchiaro, C. A., Fontana, M. (2016). New algebraic properties of an amalgamated algebra along an ideal. Commun. Algebra 44(5):1836–1851.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]] hold under the assumption (not explicitly declared) that B = f(A)+J. Furthermore, we provide here the exact value for the embedding dimension of A?^fJ, also when B≠f(A)+J, under the hypothesis that J is finitely generated as an ideal of the ring f(A)+J.     

Maps preserving the nilpotency of products of operators

Let B(X) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on the Banach space X, and let N(X) be the set of nilpotent operators in B(X). Suppose ?:B(X)→B(X) is a surjective map such that A,B∈B(X) satisfy AB∈N(X) if and only if ?(A)?(B)∈N(X). If X is infinite dimensional, then there exists a map f:B(X)→C?{0} such that one of the following holds:

(a)

There is a bijective bounded linear or conjugate-linear operator S:X→X such that ? has the form A?S[f(A)A]S^-1.

(b)

The space X is reflexive, and there exists a bijective bounded linear or conjugate-linear operator S : X′ → X such that ? has the form A ? S[f(A)A′]S⁻¹.

If X has dimension n with 3 ? n < ∞, and B(X) is identified with the algebra M_n of n × n complex matrices, then there exist a map f:M_n→C?{0}, a field automorphism ξ:C→C, and an invertible S ∈ M_n such that ? has one of the following forms:

     

Characterizations of *-Cancellation Ideals of an Integral Domain

Let D be an integral domain and * a star-operation on D. For a nonzero ideal I of D, let I ^{* _f} = ?{J* | (0) ≠ J ? I is finitely generated} and I ^{* _w} = ? _{P∈* f -Max(D)} ID _P . A nonzero ideal I of D is called a *-cancellation ideal if (IA)* = (IB)* for nonzero ideals A and B of D implies A* =B*. Let X be an indeterminate over D and N _* = {f ∈ D[X] | (c(f))* =D}. We show that I is a * _w -cancellation ideal if and only if I is * _f -locally principal, if and only if ID[X] _{N *} is a cancellation ideal. As a corollary, we have that each nonzero ideal of D is a * _w -cancellation ideal if and only if D _P is a principal ideal domain for all P ∈ * _f -Max(D), if and only if D[X] _{N *} is an almost Dedekind domain. We also show that if I is a * _w -cancellation ideal of D, then I ^{* _w}  = I ^{* _f}  = I _t , and I is * _w -invertible if and only if I ^{* _w}  = J _v for a nonzero finitely generated ideal J of D.     

Upper bounds for the order of an additive basis obtained by removing a finite subset of a given basis

Let A be an additive basis of order h and X be a finite nonempty subset of A such that the set A?X is still a basis. In this article, we give several upper bounds for the order of A?X in function of the order h of A and some parameters related to X and A. If the parameter in question is the cardinality of X, Nathanson and Nash already obtained some of such upper bounds, which can be seen as polynomials in h with degree (|X|+1). Here, by taking instead of the cardinality of X the parameter defined by , we show that the order of A?X is bounded above by . As a consequence, we deduce that if X is an arithmetic progression of length ?3, then the upper bounds of Nathanson and Nash are considerably improved. Further, by considering more complex parameters related to both X and A, we get upper bounds which are polynomials in h with degree only 2.     

Minimal free resolution of the associated graded ring of monomial curves of generalized arithmetic sequences

Let A(C) be the coordinate ring of a monomial curve C⊆Aⁿ corresponding to the numerical semigroup S minimally generated by a sequence a₀,…,a_n. In the literature, little is known about the Betti numbers of the corresponding associated graded ring gr_m(A) with respect to the maximal ideal m of A=A(C). In this paper we characterize the numerical invariants of a minimal free resolution of gr_m(A) in the case a₀,…,a_n is a generalized arithmetic sequence.