Vertex decompositions of sparse graphs into an independent vertex set and a subgraph of maximum degree at most 1

A graph G is (1, 0)-colorable if its vertex set can be partitioned into subsets V ₁ and V ₀ so that in G[V ₁] every vertex has degree at most 1, while G[V ₀] is edgeless. We prove that every graph with maximum average degree at most $\tfrac{{12}} {5} $\tfrac{{12}} {5} is (1, 0)-colorable. In particular, every planar graph with girth at least 12 is (1, 0)-colorable. On the other hand, we construct graphs with the maximum average degree arbitrarily close (from above) to $\tfrac{{12}} {5} $\tfrac{{12}} {5} which are not (1, 0)-colorable.     

A Degree Constraint for Uniquely Hamiltonian Graphs

A graph, G, is called uniquely Hamiltonian if it contains exactly one Hamilton cycle. We show that if G=(V, E) is uniquely Hamiltonian then Where #(G)=1 if G has even number of vertices and 2 if G has odd number of vertices. It follows that every n-vertex uniquely Hamiltonian graph contains a vertex whose degree is at most c log₂n+2 where c=(log₂3−1)⁻¹≈1.71 thereby improving a bound given by Bondy and Jackson [3].     

Untangling Polygons and Graphs

Untangling is a process in which some vertices in a drawing of a planar graph are moved to obtain a straight-line plane drawing. The aim is to move as few vertices as possible. We present an algorithm that untangles the cycle graph C _n while keeping Ω(n ^2/3) vertices fixed. For any connected graph G, we also present an upper bound on the number of fixed vertices in the worst case. The bound is a function of the number of vertices, maximum degree, and diameter of G. One consequence is that every 3-connected planar graph has a drawing δ such that at most O((nlog n)^2/3) vertices are fixed in every untangling of δ.     

On the Structure of Graphs with Bounded Asteroidal Number

 A set A⊆V of the vertices of a graph G=(V,E) is an asteroidal set if for each vertex a∈A, the set A\{a} is contained in one component of G−N[a]. The maximum cardinality of an asteroidal set of G, denoted by an (G), is said to be the asteroidal number of G. We investigate structural properties of graphs of bounded asteroidal number. For every k≥1, an (G)≤k if and only if an (H)≤k for every minimal triangulation H of G. A dominating target is a set D of vertices such that D∪S is a dominating set of G for every set S such that G[D∪S] is connected. We show that every graph G has a dominating target with at most an (G) vertices. Finally, a connected graph G has a spanning tree T such that d _T (x,y)−d _G (x,y)≤3·|D|−1 for every pair x,y of vertices and every dominating target D of G. Received: July 3, 1998 Final version received: August 10, 1999     

The Convexity Number of a Graph

 For two vertices u and v of a connected graph G, the set I[u,v] consists of all those vertices lying on a u−v shortest path in G, while for a set S of vertices of G, the set I[S] is the union of all sets I[u,v] for u,v∈S. A set S is convex if I[S]=S. The convexity number con(G) of G is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of G. The clique number ω(G) is the maximum cardinality of a clique in G. If G is a connected graph of order n that is not complete, then n≥3 and 2≤ω(G)≤con(G)≤n−1. It is shown that for every triple l,k,n of integers with n≥3 and 2≤l≤k≤n−1, there exists a noncomplete connected graph G of order n with ω(G)=l and con(G)=k. Other results on convex numbers are also presented. Received: August 19, 1998 Final version received: May 17, 2000     

Minus total domination in graphs

A three-valued function f: V → {−1, 0, 1} defined on the vertices of a graph G= (V, E) is a minus total dominating function (MTDF) if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. That is, for every υ ∈ V, f(N(υ)) ⩾ 1, where N(υ) consists of every vertex adjacent to υ. The weight of an MTDF is f(V) = Σf(υ), over all vertices υ ∈ V. The minus total domination number of a graph G, denoted γ _t ⁻(G), equals the minimum weight of an MTDF of G. In this paper, we discuss some properties of minus total domination on a graph G and obtain a few lower bounds for γ _t ⁻(G).     

Domination number in graphs with minimum degree two

A set D of vertices of a graph G = （V, E） is called a dominating set if every vertex of V not in D is adjacent to a vertex of D. In 1996, Reed proved that every graph of order n with minimum degree at least 3 has a dominating set of cardinality at most 3n/8. In this paper we generalize Reed＇s result. We show that every graph G of order n with minimum degree at least 2 has a dominating set of cardinality at most （3n ＋IV21）/8, where V2 denotes the set of vertices of degree 2 in G. As an application of the above result, we show that for k ≥ 1, the k-restricted domination number rk （G, γ） ≤ （3n＋5k）/8 for all graphs of order n with minimum degree at least 3.     

Friendship Two-Graphs

A friendship graph is a graph in which every two distinct vertices have exactly one common neighbor. All finite friendship graphs are known, each of them consists of triangles having a common vertex. We extend friendship graphs to two-graphs, a two-graph being an ordered pair G = (G ₀, G ₁) of edge-disjoint graphs G ₀ and G ₁ on the same vertex-set V(G ₀) = V(G ₁). One may think that the edges of G are colored with colors 0 and 1. In a friendship two-graph, every unordered pair of distinct vertices u, v is connected by a unique bicolored 2-path. The pairs of adjacency matrices of friendship two-graphs are solutions to the matrix equation AB + BA = J − I, where A and B are n × n symmetric 0 − 1 matrices, J is an n × n matrix with every entry being 1, and I is the identity n × n matrix. We show that there is no finite friendship two-graph with minimum vertex degree at most two. However, we construct an infinite such graph, and this construction can be extended to an infinite (uncountable) family. Also, we find a finite friendship two-graph, conjecture that it is unique, and prove this conjecture for the two-graphs that have a dominating vertex.     

One sufficient condition for Hamiltonian graphs involving distances

In 1990 G. T. Chen proved that if G is a 2-connected graph of order n and 2|N(x) ∪ N(y)| + d(x) + d(y) ≥ 2n − 1 for each pair of nonadjacent vertices x, y ∈ V (G), then G is Hamiltonian. In this paper we prove that if G is a 2-connected graph of order n and 2|N(x) ∪ N(y)| + d(x)+d(y) ≥ 2n−1 for each pair of nonadjacent vertices x, y ∈ V (G) such that d(x, y) = 2, then G is Hamiltonian.     

Pan-connectedness of graphs with large neighborhood unions

Let G be a simple graph with n vertices. For any v ? V(G){v \in V(G)} , let N(v)={u ? V(G): uv ? E(G)}{N(v)=\{u \in V(G): uv \in E(G)\}} , NC(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC(G)= \min \{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and uv \not ? E(G)}{uv \not \in E(G)\}} , and NC₂(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC_2(G)= \min\{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and u and v has distance 2 in E(G)}. Let l ≥ 1 be an integer. A graph G on n ≥ l vertices is [l, n]-pan-connected if for any u, v ? V(G){u, v \in V(G)} , and any integer m with l ≤ m ≤ n, G has a (u, v)-path of length m. In 1998, Wei and Zhu (Graphs Combinatorics 14:263–274, 1998) proved that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [6, n]-pan-connected. They conjectured that such graphs should be [5, n]-pan-connected. In this paper, we prove that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [5, n]-pan-connected. Consequently, the conjecture of Wei and Zhu is proved as NC ₂(G) ≥ NC(G). Furthermore, we show that the lower bound is best possible and characterize all 2-connected graphs with NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1 which are not [4, n]-pan-connected.     

Vertex decompositions of sparse graphs into an edgeless subgraph and a subgraph of maximum degree at most k

A graph G is (k,0)‐colorable if its vertices can be partitioned into subsets V₁ and V₂ such that in G[V₁] every vertex has degree at most k, while G[V₂] is edgeless. For every integer k?0, we prove that every graph with the maximum average degree smaller than (3k+4)/(k+2) is (k,0)‐colorable. In particular, it follows that every planar graph with girth at least 7 is (8, 0)‐colorable. On the other hand, we construct planar graphs with girth 6 that are not (k,0)‐colorable for arbitrarily large k. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65:83–93, 2010     

On the Upper Bounds of the Numbers of Perfect Matchings in Graphs with Given Parameters

Let φ(G),κ(G),α(G),χ(G),cl(G),diam(G)denote the number of perfect matchings,connectivity,independence number,chromatic number,clique number and diameter of a graph G,respectively.In this note,by constructing some extremal graphs,the following extremal problems are solved:1.max{φ(G):|V(G)|=2n,κ(G)≤k}=k[(2n-3)!!],2.max{φ(G):|V(G)|=2n,α(G)≥k}=[multiply from i=0 to k-1(2n-k-i)[(2n-2k-1)!!],3.max{φ(G):|V(G)|=2n,χ(G)≤k}=φ(T_(k,2n))T_(k,2n)is the Turán graph,that is a complete k-partite graphon 2n vertices in which all parts are as equal in size as possible,4.max{φ(G):|V(G)|=2n,cl(G)=2}=n1,5.max{φ(G):|V(G)|=2n,diam(G)≥2}=(2n-2)(2n-3)[(2n-5)!!],max{φ(G):|V(G)|=2n,diam(G)≥3}=(n-1)~2[(2n-5)!!].     

On the total domination subdivision numbers in graphs

A set S of vertices of a graph G = (V, E) without isolated vertex is a total dominating set if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number γ _t (G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. The total domination subdivision number sd_γt (G) is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the total domination number. Karami, Khoeilar, Sheikholeslami and Khodkar, (Graphs and Combinatorics, 2009, 25, 727–733) proved that for any connected graph G of order n ≥ 3, sd_{γ t} (G) ≤ 2γ _t (G) − 1 and posed the following problem: Characterize the graphs that achieve the aforementioned upper bound. In this paper we first prove that sd_{γ t} (G) ≤ 2α′(G) for every connected graph G of order n ≥ 3 and δ(G) ≥ 2 where α′(G) is the maximum number of edges in a matching in G and then we characterize all connected graphs G with sd_{γ t} (G)=2γ _t (G)−1.     

Bounds on the Total Restrained Domination Number of a Graph

Let G = (V, E) be a graph. A set S í V{S \subseteq V} is a total restrained dominating set if every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in S and every vertex of V − S is adjacent to a vertex in V − S. The total restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ _tr (G), is the smallest cardinality of a total restrained dominating set of G. We show that if δ ≥ 3, then γ _tr (G) ≤ n − δ − 2 provided G is not one of several forbidden graphs. Furthermore, we show that if G is r − regular, where 4 ≤ r ≤ n − 3, then γ _tr (G) ≤ n − diam(G) − r + 1.     

Path extendable graphs

A pathP in a graphG is said to beextendable if there exists a pathP’ inG with the same endvertices asP such thatV(P)⊆V (P’) and |V(P’)|=|V(P)|+1. A graphG ispath extendable if every nonhamiltonian path inG is extendable. We investigate the extent to which known sufficient conditions for a graph to be hamiltonian-connected imply the extendability of paths in the graph. Several theorems are proved: for example, it is shown that ifG is a graph of orderp in which the degree sum of each pair of non-adjacent vertices is at leastp+1 andP is a nonextendable path of orderk inG thenk≤(p+1)/2 and 〈V (P)〉≅K _k orK _k −e. As corollaries of this we deduce that if δ(G)≥(p+2)/2 or if the degree sum of each pair of nonadjacent vertices inG is at least (3p−3)/2 thenG is path extendable, which strengthen results of Williamson [13].     

The hamiltonian chromatic number of a connected graph without large hamiltonian-connected subgraphs

If G is a connected graph of order n ⩾ 1, then by a hamiltonian coloring of G we mean a mapping c of V (G) into the set of all positive integers such that |c(x) − c(y)| ⩾ n − 1 − D _G (x, y) (where D _G (x, y) denotes the length of a longest x − y path in G) for all distinct x, y ∈ V (G). Let G be a connected graph. By the hamiltonian chromatic number of G we mean

On the Existence of a Long Path Between Specified Vertices in a 2-Connected Graph

 Let G be a 2-connected graph with maximum degree Δ (G)≥d, and let x and y be distinct vertices of G. Let W be a subset of V(G)−{x, y} with cardinality at most d−1. Suppose that max{d _G(u), d _G(v)}≥d for every pair of vertices u and v in V(G)−({x, y}∪W) with d _G(u,v)=2. Then x and y are connected by a path of length at least d−|W|. Received: February 5, 1998 Revised: April 13, 1998     

Tiling Transitive Tournaments and Their Blow-ups

Let TT _k denote the transitive tournament on k vertices. Let TT(h,k) denote the graph obtained from TT _k by replacing each vertex with an independent set of size h≥1. The following result is proved: Let c ₂=1/2, c ₃=5/6 and c _k =1−2^{−k−log k} for k≥4. For every ∈>0 there exists N=N(∈,h,k) such that for every undirected graph G with n>N vertices and with δ(G)≥c _k n, every orientation of G contains vertex disjoint copies of TT(h,k) that cover all but at most ∈n vertices. In the cases k=2 and k=3 the result is asymptotically tight. For k≥4, c _k cannot be improved to less than 1−2^{−0.5k(1+o(1))}. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Distance-Dominating Cycles in Quasi Claw-Free Graphs

We say that a graph G is quasi claw-free if every pair (a ₁, a ₂) of vertices at distance 2 satisfies {u∈N (a ₁)∩N (a ₂) | N[u]⊆N[a ₁]∪N [a ₂]}≠∅. A cycle C is m-dominating if every vertex of G is of distance at most m from C. We prove that if G is a κ-connected (κ≥2) quasi claw-free graph then either G has an m-dominating cycle or G has a set of at least κ+1 vertices such that the distance between every pair of them is at least 2m+3. Received: June 12, 1996 Revised: November 9, 1998     

Trees with Equal Domination and Restrained Domination Numbers

Let G = (V,E) be a graph and let S V. The set S is a packing in G if the vertices of S are pairwise at distance at least three apart in G. The set S is a dominating set (DS) if every vertex in V − S is adjacent to a vertex in S. Further, if every vertex in V − S is also adjacent to a vertex in V − S, then S is a restrained dominating set (RDS). The domination number of G, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a DS of G, while the restrained domination number of G, denoted by γ_r(G), is the minimum cardinality of a RDS of G. The graph G is γ-excellent if every vertex of G belongs to some minimum DS of G. A constructive characterization of trees with equal domination and restrained domination numbers is presented. As a consequence of this characterization we show that the following statements are equivalent: (i) T is a tree with γ(T)=γ_r(T); (ii) T is a γ-excellent tree and T ≠ K₂; and (iii) T is a tree that has a unique maximum packing and this set is a dominating set of T. We show that if T is a tree of order n with ℓ leaves, then γ_r(T) ≤ (n + ℓ + 1)/2, and we characterize those trees achieving equality.