The course of (R2R'SiO)3TaCl2 (R = tBu, R' = H, Me, Ph, tBu (silox); R = iPr, R' = tBu, iPr) reduction is dependent on siloxide size

Various sized siloxides (Cy(3)SiO > (t)Bu(3)SiO > (t)Bu(2)PhSiO > (t)Bu(2)MeSiO approximately (i)Pr(2)(t)BuSiO > (i)Pr(3)SiO > (t)Bu(2)HSiO) were used to make (R(2)R'SiO)(3)TaCl(2) (R = (t)Bu, R' = H (1-H), Me (1-Me), Ph (1-Ph), (t)Bu (1); R = (i)Pr, R' = (t)Bu (1-(i)Pr(2)); R = R' = (i)Pr (1-(i)Pr(3)); R = R' = (c)Hex (Cy)). Product analyses of sodium amalgam reductions of several dichlorides suggest that [(R(2)R'SiO)(3)Ta](2)(mu-Cl)(2) may be a common intermediate. When the siloxide is large (1-(t)Bu), formation of the Ta(III) species ((t)Bu(3)SiO)(3)Ta (6) occurs via disproportionation. When the siloxide is small, the Ta(IV) intermediate is stable (e.g., [((i)Pr(3)SiO)(3)Ta](2)(mu-Cl)(2) (2)), and when intermediate sized siloxides are used, solvent bond activation via unstable Ta(III) tris-siloxides is proposed to occur. Under hydrogen, reductions of 1-Me and 1-Ph provide Ta(IV) and Ta(V) hydrides [((t)Bu(2)MeSiO)(3)Ta](2)(micro-H)(2) (4-Me) and ((t)Bu(2)PhSiO)(3)TaH(2) (7-Ph), respectively.     

Ligand rotation in [Ar(R)N]3M-N2-M'[N(R)Ar]3(M, M' = MoIII, NbIII; R = iPr and tBu) dimers

Earlier calculations on the model N2-bridged dimer (micro-N2)-{Mo[NH2]3}2 revealed that ligand rotation away from a trigonal arrangement around the metal centres was energetically favourable resulting in a reversal of the singlet and triplet energies such that the singlet state was stabilized 13 kJ mol(-1) below the D(3d) triplet structure. These calculations, however, ignored the steric bulk of the amide ligands N(R)Ar (R =iPr and tBu, Ar = 3,5-C6H3Me2) which may prevent or limit the extent of ligand rotation. In order to investigate the consequences of steric crowding, density functional calculations using QM/MM techniques have been performed on the Mo(III)Mo(III) and Mo(III)Nb(III) intermediate dimer complexes (mu-N(2))-{Mo[N(R)Ar]3}2 and [Ar(R)N]3Mo-(mu-N2)-Nb[N(R)Ar]3 formed when three-coordinate Mo[N(R)Ar]3 and Nb[N(R)Ar]3 react with dinitrogen. The calculations indicate that ligand rotation away from a trigonal arrangement is energetically favourable for all of the ligands investigated and that the distortion is largely electronic in origin. However, the steric constraints of the bulky amide groups do play a role in determining the final orientation of the ligands, in particular, whether the ligands are rotated at one or both metal centres of the dimer. Analogous to the model system, QM/MM calculations predict a singlet ground state for the (mu-N2)-{Mo[N(R)Ar]3}2 dimers, a result which is seemingly at odds with the experimental triplet ground state found for the related (mu-N2)-{Mo[N(tBu)Ph]3}2 system. However, QM/MM calculations on the (mu-N2)-{Mo[N(tBu)Ph]3}2 dimer reveal that the singlet-triplet gap is nearly 20 kJ mol(-1) smaller and therefore this complex is expected to exhibit very different magnetic behaviour to the (mu-N2)-{Mo[N(R)Ar]3}2 system.     

Interception of a Rh(I)-Rh(III) dinuclear trihydride complex revealing the dihydrogen activation by [Rh(CO)2{(R,R)-Ph-BPE}

Reaction of [Rh(CO)(2){(R,R)-Ph-BPE}][BF(4)] 1 under 7 bar H(2) provides the dihydride [Rh(H)(2)(CO)(2){(R,R)-Ph-BPE}][BF(4)] 3, which reacts with the neutral hydride [Rh(H)(CO){(R,R)-Ph-BPE}] 2 arising from 3 in THF. The resulting complex is the dimeric monocationic Rh((I))-Rh((III)) complex [Rh(H)(2)(CO)(2){(R,R)-Ph-BPE}][BF(4)] 4.     

Metallo(alkyl)chlorophosphanes Cp(CO)3 M-P(R)CI (M=Mo,W; R=Me,Ph, tBu,C5Me5) - Novel Sources for Phosphinidenes

Abstract

Metallation of organodichlorophosphanes RPC1₂ (R=Me, Ph, tBu, C₅Me₅) with Na[M(CO)₃Cp] (M=Mo, W) in benzene yields the thermolabile Metallo(alkyl)chlorophosphanes la-g. In solution la-d show a high tendency to decompose to the corresponding metal chloride Cp(CO)₃M-Cl with phosphinidene elimination. The rate of decomposition depends on the metal and the phosphorus ligand (Mo > W, Me > Ph > tBu C₅Me₅)     

Reactions of aliphatic ketones R2CO (R=Me, Et, iPr and tBu) with the MCI4/Li(Hg) system (M=U or Ti): mechanistic analogies between the McMurry, Wittig, and Clemmensen reactions

Analysis of the products of the reactions of ketones R2CO (R = Me, Et, iPr, tBu) with the MCl4/Li(Hg) system (M = U, Ti) at 20 degrees C revealed significant differences. For R = Me, the reaction proceeded exclusively (M = U) or preferentially (M = Ti) via a metallopinacol intermediate resulting from dimerization of ketyl radicals. Pinacol was liberated by hydrolysis, and tetramethylethylene was obtained after further reduction at 65 degrees C. For R=iPr, formation of iPr2C=CiPr2 as the only coupling product, the nonproduction of this alkene by reduction of the uranium pinacolate [U]-OCR2CR2O-[U] (R= iPr) at 20 degrees C, and the instability of the corresponding titanium pinacolate towards rupture of the pinacolic C-C bond indicated that reductive coupling of iPr2CO did not proceed by dimerization of ketyl radicals. Formation of 2,4-dimethyl-2-pentene was in favor of a carbenoid intermediate resulting from deoxygenative reduction of the ketyl. These results revealed that for sterically hindered ketones, McMurry reactions can be viewed as Wittig-like olefination reactions. For R=tBu, no coupling product was obtained and the alkane tBu2CH2 was the major product. The involvement of the carbenoid species [M]=CtBu2 was confirmed by its trapping with H2O, leading to tBu2CH2, and with the aldehydes RCHO, giving the cross-coupling products tBu2C=C(R)H (R = Me, tBu). Therefore, in the case of severely congested ketones, McMurry reactions present strong similarities to the Clemmensen reduction of ketones, owing to the involvement in both reactions of carbenoid species which exhibit similar reactivity.     

Carbon-carbon bond activation of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-1-oxyl by a Rh(II) metalloradical: a combined experimental and theoretical study

Competitive major carbon-carbon bond activation (CCA) and minor carbon-hydrogen bond activation (CHA) channels are identified in the reaction between rhodium(II) meso-tetramesitylporphyrin [Rh(II)(tmp)] (1) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) (2). The CCA and CHA pathways lead to formation of [Rh(III)(tmp)Me] (3) and [Rh(III)(tmp)H] (5), respectively. In the presence of excess TEMPO, [Rh(II)(tmp)] is regenerated from [Rh(III)(tmp)H] with formation of 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-1-ol (TEMPOH) (4) via a subsequent hydrogen atom abstraction pathway. The yield of the CCA product [Rh(III)(tmp)Me] increased with higher temperature at the cost of the CHA product TEMPOH in the temperature range 50-80 degrees C. Both the CCA and CHA pathways follow second-order kinetics. The mechanism of the TEMPO carbon-carbon bond activation was studied by means of kinetic investigations and DFT calculations. Broken symmetry, unrestricted b3-lyp calculations along the open-shell singlet surface reveal a low-energy transition state (TS1) for direct TEMPO methyl radical abstraction by the Rh(II) radical (SH2 type mechanism). An alternative ionic pathway, with a somewhat higher barrier, was identified along the closed-shell singlet surface. This ionic pathway proceeds in two sequential steps: Electron transfer from TEMPO to [Rh(II)(por)] producing the [TEMPO]+ [RhI(por)]- cation-anion pair, followed by net CH3+ transfer from TEMPO+ to Rh(I) with formation of [Rh(III)(por)Me] and (DMPO-like) 2,2,6-trimethyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1-pyridiniumolate. The transition state for this process (TS2) is best described as an SN2-like nucleophilic substitution involving attack of the d(z)2 orbital of [Rh(I)(por)]- at one of the C(Me)-C(ring) sigma* orbitals of [TEMPO]+. Although the calculated barrier of the open-shell radical pathway is somewhat lower than the barrier for the ionic pathway, R-DFT and U-DFT are not likely comparatively accurate enough to reliably distinguish between these possible pathways. Both the radical (SH2) and the ionic (SN2) pathway have barriers which are low enough to explain the experimental kinetic data.     

Rapid C-H bond activation by a monocopper(III)-hydroxide complex

One-electron oxidation of the tetragonal Cu(II) complex [Bu(4)N][LCuOH] at -80 °C generated the reactive intermediate LCuOH, which was shown to be a Cu(III) complex on the basis of spectroscopy and theory (L = N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2,6-pyridinedicarboxamide). The complex LCuOH reacts with dihydroanthracene to yield anthracene and the Cu(II) complex LCu(OH(2)). Kinetic studies showed that the reaction occurs via H-atom abstraction via a second-order rate law at high rates (cf. k = 1.1(1) M(-1) s(-1) at -80 °C, ΔH(?) = 5.4(2) kcal mol(-1), ΔS(?) = -30(2) eu) and with very large kinetic isotope effects (cf. k(H)/k(D) = 44 at -70 °C). The findings suggest that a Cu(III)-OH moiety is a viable reactant in oxidation catalysis.     

Reactivity of the inversely polarized phosphaalkenes RP=C(NMe2)2 (R = tBu, Me3Si, H) towards arylcarbene complexes [(CO)5M=C(oEt)Ar] (Ar= Ph, M = Cr, W; Ar = 2-MeC6H4, 2-MeOC6H4, M = W)

The reaction of the arylated Fischer carbene complexes [(CO)5M=C(OEt)Ar] (Ar=Ph; M = Cr, W; 2-MeC6H4; 2-MeOC6H; M = W) with the phosphaalkenes RP=C(NMe2), (R=tBu, SiMe3) afforded the novel phosphaalkene complexes [[RP=C(OEt)Ar]M(CO)5] in addition to the compounds [(RP=C(NMe2)2]M(CO)5]. Only in the case of the R = SiMe3 (E/Z) mixtures of the metathesis products were obtained. The bis(dimethylamino)methylene unit of the phosphaalkene precursor was incorporated in olefins of the type (Me2N)2C=C(OEt)(Ar). Treatment of [(CO)5W=C(OEt)(2-MeOC6H4)] with HP=C(NMe2)2 gave rise to the formation of an E/Z mixture of [[(Me2N)2CH-P=C(OEt)(2-MeOC6H4)]W(CO)5] the organophosphorus ligand of which formally results from a combination of the carbene ligand and the phosphanediyl [P-CH(NMe2)2]. The reactions reported here strongly depend on an inverse distribution of alpha-electron density in the phosphaalkene precursors (Pdelta Cdelta+), which renders these molecules powerfu] nucleophiles.     

Zur Bildung und Struktur der Phosphinophosphiniden-phosphorane tBu2P?PP(Me)tBu2 1, tBu(Me3Si)P?PP(Me)tBu2 2 und tBu2P?PP(Br)tBu2 3

Synthesis and Structure of Phosphinophosphinidene-phosphoranes tBu₂P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ 1, tBu(Me₃Si)P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ 2, and tBu₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 3 A new method for the synthesis of 1 and 2 (Formulae see ?Inhaltsübersicht”?) is reported based on the reaction of 5 with substitution reagents (Me₂SO₄ or CH₃Cl). The results of the X-ray structure determination of 1 and 2 are given and compared with those of 3 . While in 3 one P? P distance corresponds to a double bond and the other P? P distance to a single bond (difference 12.5 pm) the differences of the P? P distances in 1 and 2 are much smaller: 5.28 pm in 1 , 4.68 pm in 2 . Both 1 and 2 crystallize monoclinic in the space group P2₁/n (Z = 4). 2 additionally contains two disordered molecules of the solvent pentane in the unit cell. Parameters of 1 : a = 884.32(8) pm, b = 1 924.67(25) pm, c = 1 277.07(13) pm, β = 100.816(8)°, and of 2 : a = 1 101.93(12) pm, b = 1 712.46(18) pm, c = 1 395.81(12) pm, β = 111.159(7)°, all data collected at 143 K. The skeleton of the three P atoms is bent (PPP angle 100.95° for 1 , 100.29° for 2 and 105.77° for 3 ). Ab initio SCF calculations are used to discuss the bonding situation in the molecular skeleton of the three P atoms of 1 and 3 . The results show a significant contribution of the ionic structure R₂P? P(^?)? P(⁺)(X)R₂. The structure with (partially) charged P atoms is stabilized by bulky polarizable groups R (as tBu) as compared to the fully covalent structure R₂P? P(X)? PR₂.     

Variable trends in R-X bond dissociation energies (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu)

[structure: see text] High level ab initio molecular orbital calculations confirm experimental indications that the effect of alkyl substituents (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu) on R-X bond dissociation energies varies considerably according to the nature of X. A simple qualitative explanation in terms of valence-bond theory is presented, highlighting the increasing importance of the stabilization of R-X by the ionic R(+)X(-) configuration for electronegative X substituents (such as F, OH, and OCH(3)).     

Synthesis and reactivity of Ir(I) and Ir(III) complexes with MeNH2, Me2C=NR (R = H, Me), C,N-C6H4{C(Me)=N(Me)}-2, and N,N'-RN=C(Me)CH2C(Me2)NHR (R = H, Me) ligands

Complexes [Ir(Cp*)Cl(n)(NH2Me)(3-n)]X(m) (n = 2, m = 0 (1), n = 1, m = 1, X = Cl (2a), n = 0, m = 2, X = OTf (3)) are obtained by reacting [Ir(Cp*)Cl(mu-Cl)]2 with MeNH2 (1:2 or 1:8) or with [Ag(NH2Me)2]OTf (1:4), respectively. Complex 2b (n = 1, m = 1, X = ClO 4) is obtained from 2a and NaClO4 x H2O. The reaction of 3 with MeC(O)Ph at 80 degrees C gives [Ir(Cp*){C,N-C6H4{C(Me)=N(Me)}-2}(NH2Me)]OTf (4), which in turn reacts with RNC to give [Ir(Cp*){C,N-C6H4{C(Me)=N(Me)}-2}(CNR)]OTf (R = (t)Bu (5), Xy (6)). [Ir(mu-Cl)(COD)]2 reacts with [Ag{N(R)=CMe2}2]X (1:2) to give [Ir{N(R)=CMe2}2(COD)]X (R = H, X = ClO4 (7); R = Me, X = OTf (8)). Complexes [Ir(CO)2(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 (9) and [IrCl{N(R)=CMe2}(COD)] (R = H (10), Me (11)) are obtained from the appropriate [Ir{N(R)=CMe2}2(COD)]X and CO or Me4NCl, respectively. [Ir(Cp*)Cl(mu-Cl)]2 reacts with [Au(NH=CMe2)(PPh3)]ClO4 (1:2) to give [Ir(Cp*)(mu-Cl)(NH=CMe2)]2(ClO4)2 (12) which in turn reacts with PPh 3 or Me4NCl (1:2) to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl(NH=CMe2)(PPh3)]ClO4 (13) or [Ir(Cp*)Cl2(NH=CMe2)] (14), respectively. Complex 14 hydrolyzes in a CH2Cl2/Et2O solution to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl2(NH3)] (15). The reaction of [Ir(Cp*)Cl(mu-Cl)]2 with [Ag(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 (1:4) gives [Ir(Cp*)(NH=CMe2)3](ClO4)2 (16a), which reacts with PPNCl (PPN = Ph3=P=N=PPh3) under different reaction conditions to give [Ir(Cp*)(NH=CMe2)3]XY (X = Cl, Y = ClO4 (16b); X = Y = Cl (16c)). Equimolar amounts of 14 and 16a react to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 (17), which in turn reacts with PPNCl to give [Ir(Cp*)Cl(H-imam)]Cl (R-imam = N,N'-N(R)=C(Me)CH2C(Me)2NHR (18a)]. Complexes [Ir(Cp*)Cl(R-imam)]ClO4 (R = H (18b), Me (19)) are obtained from 18a and AgClO4 or by refluxing 2b in acetone for 7 h, respectively. They react with AgClO4 and the appropriate neutral ligand or with [Ag(NH=CMe2)2]ClO4 to give [Ir(Cp*)(R-imam)L](ClO4)2 (R = H, L = (t)BuNC (20), XyNC (21); R = Me, L = MeCN (22)) or [Ir(Cp*)(H-imam)(NH=CMe2)](ClO4)2 (23a), respectively. The later reacts with PPNCl to give [Ir(Cp*)(H-imam)(NH=CMe2)]Cl(ClO4) (23b). The reaction of 22 with XyNC gives [Ir(Cp*)(Me-imam)(CNXy)](ClO4)2 (24). The structures of complexes 15, 16c and 18b have been solved by X-ray diffraction methods.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Three Homoleptic Bismuth Silanolates: [Bi(OSiR3)3] (R = Me,Et, iPr)

The bismuth tris(triorganosilanolates) [Bi(OSiR₃)₃] ( 1 , R = Me; 2 , R = Et; 3 , R = iPr) were prepared by reaction of R₃SiOH with [Bi(OtBu)₃]. Compound 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group with Z = 2 and the lattice constants a = 10.323(1) Å, b = 13.805(1) Å, c = 21.096(1) Å and α = 91.871(4)°, β = 94.639(3)°, γ = 110.802(3)°. In the solid state compound 1 is a trimer as result of weak intermolecular bismuth‐oxygen interactions with Bi–O distances in the range 2.686(6)–3.227(3) Å. The coordination at the bismuth atoms Bi(1) and Bi(3) is best described as 3 + 2 coordination whereas Bi(2) shows a 3 + 3 coordination. The intramolecular Bi–O distances fall in the range 2.041(3)–2.119(3) Å. Compound 3 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbcm with Z = 4 and the lattice constants a = 7.201(1) Å, b = 23.367(5) Å and c = 20.893(1) Å, whereas the triethylsilyl‐derivative 2 is liquid. In contrast to [Bi(OSiMe₃)₃] ( 1 ) compound 3 is monomeric in the solid state, but shows similar intramolecular Bi–O distances in the range 1.998(2)–2.065(5) Å. The bismuth silanolates are highly soluble in common organic solvents and strongly moisture sensitive. Compound 1 shows the lowest thermal stability.     

Dynamic Effects Dictate the Mechanism and Selectivity of Dehydration–Rearrangement Reactions of Protonated Alcohols [Me2(R)CCH(OH2)Me]+ (R=Me,Et, iPr) in the Gas Phase

The gas‐phase dehydration–rearrangement (DR) reactions of protonated alcohols [Me₂(R)CCH(OH₂)Me]⁺ [R=Me ( ME ), Et ( ET ), and iPr ( I‐PR )] were studied by using static approaches (intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC), Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus theory) and dynamics (quasiclassical trajectory) simulations at the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level of theory. The concerted mechanism involves simultaneous water dissociation and alkyl migration, whereas in the stepwise reaction pathway the dehydration step leads to a secondary carbocation intermediate followed by alkyl migration. Internal rotation (IR) can change the relative position of the migrating alkyl group and the leaving group (water), so distinct products may be obtained: [Me(R)CCH(Me)Me ??? OH₂]⁺ and [Me(Me)CCH(R)Me ??? OH₂]⁺. The static approach predicts that these reactions are concerted, with the selectivity towards these different products determined by the proportion of the conformers of the initial protonated alcohols. These selectivities are explained by the DR processes being much faster than IR. These results are in direct contradiction with the dynamics simulations, which indicate a predominantly stepwise mechanism and selectivities that depend on the alkyl groups and dynamics effects. Indeed, despite the lifetimes of the secondary carbocations being short (<0.5 ps), IR can take place and thus provide a rich selectivity. These different selectivities, particularly for ET and I‐PR , are amenable to experimental observation and provide evidence for the minor role played by potential‐energy surface and the relevance of the dynamics effects (non‐IRC pathways, IR) in determining the reaction mechanisms and product distribution (selectivity).     

Lithium alkyl assisted coupling of a 2-cyano-2,3-dihydro-1H-1,3,2-diazaborole to give tBuNCH=CHN(tBu)BC(iPr)=N-BN(tBu)CH=CHNtBu

Reaction of 2-cyano-1,3,2-diazaborole tBuNCH=CHN(tBu)BCN (2) with half an equivalent of isopropyllithium afforded compound tBuNCH=CHN(tBu)BC(iPr=N-BN(tBu)CH=CHNtBu (7). In contrast to this, a 1:1 stoichiometry of the reactants led to tBuNCH=CHN(tBu)BiPr (6) as the product of a nucleophilic substitution process at the boron atom. Similarly, regardless of the molar ratio of reactants employed, treatment of 2 with cyclopropyllithium, isobutyllithium or phenyllithium afforded solely substitution products tBuNCH=CHN(tBu)BR [R =cPr (12); Ph (13); iBu (14)].     

Investigation of the microstructure of poly(propylene) in dependence of the polymerization temperature for the systems iPr[3‐RCpFlu]ZrCl2/MAO,with R = H,Me, Et,iPr, tBu,and iPr[IndFlu]ZrCl2/MAO

With six different metallocenes, namely ⁱPr[CpFlu]ZrCl₂ I , ⁱPr[3‐MeCpFlu]ZrCl₂ II , ⁱPr[3‐EtCpFlu]ZrCl₂ III , ⁱPr[3‐ⁱPrCpFlu]ZrCl₂ IV , ⁱPr[IndFlu]ZrCl₂ V and ⁱPr[3‐^tBuCpFlu]ZrCl₂ VI propene polymerizations were carried out at different polymerization temperatures. MAO was used as a cocatalyst for all polymerizations. In case of metallocenes II, III and IV an increase in isotacticity with increasing polymerization temperature was observed. This is due to the increased rotation and, as a consequence, to the increased steric demand of the substituent at the cyclopentadienyl residue. With metallocene V a catalyst of in principle the same type was synthesized, but rotation of the substituent is not possible. Here, in the contrary, the assumed effect was observed, that the stereospecificity of the metallocene decreases, while raising the polymerization temperature. In metallocene I there is no rotatory substituent at the cyclopentadienyl residue and therefore a more stereoirregular polymer is formed at higher polymerization temperatures. Metallocene VI produces poly(propylene) with slightly increased isotacticity at higher polymerization temperature.     

A cationic Rh(III) complex that efficiently catalyzes hydrogen isotope exchange in hydrosilanes

The synthesis and structural characterization of a mixed-sandwich (η(5)-C(5)Me(5))Rh(III) complex of the cyclometalated phosphine PMeXyl(2) (Xyl = 2,6-C(6)H(3)Me(2)) with unusual κ(4)-P,C,C',C' coordination (compound 1-BAr(f); BAr(f) = B(3,5-C(6)H(3)(CF(3))(2))(4)) are reported. A reversible κ(4) to κ(2) change in the binding of the chelating phosphine in cation 1(+) induced by dihydrogen and hydrosilanes triggers a highly efficient Si-H/Si-D (or Si-T) exchange applicable to a wide range of hydrosilanes. Catalysis can be carried out in an organic solvent solution or without solvent, with catalyst loadings as low as 0.001 mol %, and the catalyst may be recycled a number of times.     

Synthesis and characterisation of cyclo-boratetrasiloxane, (RBO)(Me2SiO)3 (R=nBu,Ar), derivatives

Low temperature reactions of dilute solutions of 1,5-dichloro-1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyltrisiloxane with boronic acids {RB(OH)₂; R=ⁿBu, C₆H₄Me-2, C₆H₄Me-3, C₆H₄Me-4, C₆H₄OMe-3, C₆H₄OMe-4, C₆H₄Br-2, C₆H₄Br-3, C₆H₄Br-4} in the presence of a twofold excess of Et₃N afforded the 8-membered ring products, cyclo-boratetrasiloxanes, (RBO)(Me₂SiO)₃, in moderate yields. New compounds were colourless oils and were characterised by elemental analysis, NMR (¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C, ²⁹Si), IR and MS. The cyclo-boratetrasiloxanes are weakly Lewis acidic, with acceptor number (AN) values of ∼30, but do not form adducts with amines.     

Silylchalcogenolates MESiR(t)Bu(2) (M = Na, Cu, Zn, Fe; E = S, Se, Te; R = tBu, Ph) and disilyldichalcogenides tBu2RSiE-ESiRtBu2 (E = S, Se, Te; R = tBu, Ph): synthesis, properties, and structures

The sodium silyl chalcogenolates NaESiR(t)Bu(2) (R = Ph, (t)Bu; E = S, Se, Te), accessible by the nucleophilic degradation of S, Se, or Te by the sodium silanides NaSiR(t)Bu(2) (R = Ph, (t)Bu), have been characterized by X-ray structure analysis. Protonolysis of the sodium silyl chalcogenolates yields the corresponding chalcogenols. The Cu and Zn chalcogenolates, [Cu(SSiPh(t)Bu(2))](4) and [ZnCl(SSi(t)Bu(3))(THF)](2), have been synthesized by metathesis reactions of CuCl with NaSSiPh(t)Bu(2) and of ZnCl(2) with NaSSi(t)Bu(3), respectively. The solid-state structures of the transition metal thiolates have been determined. The compounds (t)Bu(2)RSiE-ESiR(t)Bu(2) (R = Ph, (t)Bu; E = S, Se, Te) are accessible via air oxidation. With the exception of (t)Bu(3)SiS-SSi(t)Bu(3), these compounds were analyzed using X-ray crystallography and represent the first structurally characterized silylated heavy dichalcogenides. Oxidative addition of (t)Bu(3)SiTe-TeSi(t)Bu(3) to Fe(CO)(5) yields [Fe(TeSi(t)Bu(3))(CO)(3)](2), which has also been structurally characterized.