Competence-driven project portfolio selection,scheduling and staff assignment

This paper presents a new model for project portfolio selection, paying specific attention to competence development. The model seeks to maximize a weighted average of economic gains from projects and strategic gains from the increment of desirable competencies. As a sub-problem, scheduling and staff assignment for a candidate set of selected projects must also be optimized. We provide a nonlinear mixed-integer program formulation for the overall problem, and then propose heuristic solution techniques composed of (1) a greedy heuristic for the scheduling and staff assignment part, and (2) two (alternative) metaheuristics for the project selection part. The paper outlines experimental results on a real-world application provided by the E-Commerce Competence Center Austria and, for a slightly simplified instance, presents comparisons with the exact solution computed by CPLEX.     

Baseline value specification and sensitivity analysis in multiattribute project portfolio selection

A key issue in applying multi-attribute project portfolio models is specifying the baseline value – a parameter which defines how valuable not implementing a project is relative to the range of possible project values. In this paper we present novel baseline value specification techniques which admit incomplete preference statements and, unlike existing techniques, make it possible to model problems where the decision maker would prefer to implement a project with the least preferred performance level in each attribute. Furthermore, we develop computational methods for identifying the optimal portfolios and the value-to-cost -based project rankings for all baseline values. We also show how these results can be used to (i) analyze how sensitive project and portfolio decision recommendations are to variations in the baseline value and (ii) provide project decision recommendations in a situation where only incomplete information about the baseline value is available.     

A mixed R&D projects and securities portfolio selection model

The business environment is full of uncertainty. Allocating the wealth among various asset classes may lower the risk of overall portfolio and increase the potential for more benefit over the long term. In this paper, we propose a mixed single-stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection model. Specifically, we present a bi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming model. Moreover, we use semi-absolute deviation risk functions to measure the risk of mixed asset portfolio. Based on the idea of moments approximation method via linear programming, we propose a scenario generation approach for the mixed single-stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection problem. The bi-objective mixed-integer stochastic programming problem can be solved by transforming it into a single objective mixed-integer stochastic programming problem. A numerical example is given to illustrate the behavior of the proposed mixed single stage R&D projects and multi-stage securities portfolio selection model.     

A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty

In the project selection problem a decision maker is required to allocate limited resources among an available set of competing projects. These projects could arise, although not exclusively, in an R&D, information technology or capital budgeting context. We propose an evolutionary method for project selection problems with partially funded projects, multiple (stochastic) objectives, project interdependencies (in the objectives), and a linear structure for resource constraints. The method is based on posterior articulation of preferences and is able to approximate the efficient frontier composed of stochastically nondominated solutions. We compared the method with the stochastic parameter space investigation method (PSI) and illustrate it by means of an R&D portfolio problem under uncertainty based on Monte Carlo simulation.     

An approach to group decision making under uncertainty with application to project selection

In this paper we present an approach and interactive procedure for group decision making under imprecision of expert judgements as applied to problems containing explicitly given resource constraints in particular to project selection. Alternatives (projects) are evaluated in a scale with a finite number of levels. Based on these estimates, fuzzy group preferences are determined and projects are divided into domination levels. Necessary quantities of resources are given in the form of intervals. Projects from successive levels are selected until maximum resource utilization is achieved. A numerical example is included to illustrate the proposed approach and procedure.     

Stochastic linear knapsack programming problem and its application to a portfolio selection problem

In this paper a probability maximization model of a stochastic linear knapsack problem is considered where the random variables consist of several groups with mutually correlated ones. We propose a solution algorithm to the equivalent nonlinear fractional programming problem with a simple ranking method. This approach will be effectively applied to one of the portfolio selection problems.     

Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income: A discrete-time approach

This paper studies the consumption and portfolio selection problem of an agent who is liquidity constrained and has uninsurable income risk in a discrete time setting. It gives properties of optimal policies and presents numerical solutions. The paper, in particular, shows that liquidity constraints and uninsurable income risk reduce consumption and investment in the risky asset substantially from the levels for the case where no market imperfections exist. This paper also shows how the agent evaluates his or her human capital and relates the evaluation to optimal decisions.     

Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection

In decision analysis, difficulties of obtaining complete information about model parameters make it advisable to seek robust solutions that perform reasonably well across the full range of feasible parameter values. In this paper, we develop the Robust Portfolio Modeling (RPM) methodology which extends Preference Programming methods into portfolio problems where a subset of project proposals are funded in view of multiple evaluation criteria. We also develop an algorithm for computing all non-dominated portfolios, subject to incomplete information about criterion weights and project-specific performance levels. Based on these portfolios, we propose a project-level index to convey (i) which projects are robust choices (in the sense that they would be recommended even if further information were to be obtained) and (ii) how continued activities in preference elicitation should be focused. The RPM methodology is illustrated with an application using real data on road pavement projects.     

Multi‐period mean variance portfolio selection under incomplete information

This paper solves an optimal portfolio selection problem in the discrete‐time setting where the states of the financial market cannot be completely observed, which breaks the common assumption that the states of the financial market are fully observable. The dynamics of the unobservable market state is formulated by a hidden Markov chain, and the return of the risky asset is modulated by the unobservable market state. Based on the observed information up to the decision moment, an investor wants to find the optimal multi‐period investment strategy to maximize the mean‐variance utility of the terminal wealth. By adopting a sufficient statistic, the portfolio optimization problem with incompletely observable information is converted into the one with completely observable information. The optimal investment strategy is derived by using the dynamic programming approach and the embedding technique, and the efficient frontier is also presented. Compared with the case when the market state can be completely observed, we find that the unobservable market state does decrease the investment value on the risky asset in average. Finally, numerical results illustrate the impact of the unobservable market state on the efficient frontier, the optimal investment strategy and the Sharpe ratio. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Mean-semivariance models for fuzzy portfolio selection

This paper discusses portfolio selection problem in fuzzy environment. In the paper, semivariance is originally presented for fuzzy variable, and three properties of the semivariance are proven. Based on the concept of semivariance of fuzzy variable, two fuzzy mean-semivariance models are proposed. To solve the new models in general cases, a fuzzy simulation based genetic algorithm is presented in the paper. In addition, two numerical examples are also presented to illustrate the modelling idea and the effectiveness of the designed algorithm.     

Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection

The portfolio selection problem is usually considered as a bicriteria optimization problem where a reasonable trade-off between expected rate of return and risk is sought. In the classical Markowitz model the risk is measured with variance, thus generating a quadratic programming model. The Markowitz model is frequently criticized as not consistent with axiomatic models of preferences for choice under risk. Models consistent with the preference axioms are based on the relation of stochastic dominance or on expected utility theory. The former is quite easy to implement for pairwise comparisons of given portfolios whereas it does not offer any computational tool to analyze the portfolio selection problem. The latter, when used for the portfolio selection problem, is restrictive in modeling preferences of investors. In this paper, a multiple criteria linear programming model of the portfolio selection problem is developed. The model is based on the preference axioms for choice under risk. Nevertheless, it allows one to employ the standard multiple criteria procedures to analyze the portfolio selection problem. It is shown that the classical mean-risk approaches resulting in linear programming models correspond to specific solution techniques applied to our multiple criteria model. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Asymmetric risk measures and tracking models for portfolio optimization under uncertainty

Traditional asset allocation of the Markowitz type defines risk to be the variance of the return, contradicting the common-sense intuition that higher returns should be preferred to lower. An argument of Levy and Markowitz justifies the mean/variance selection criteria by deriving it from a local quadratic approximation to utility functions. We extend the Levy-Markowitz argument to account for asymmetric risk by basing the local approximation onpiecewise linear-quadratic risk measures, which can be tuned to express a wide range of preferences and adjusted to reject outliers in the data. The implications of this argument lead us to reject the commonly proposed asymmetric alternatives, the mean/lower partial moment efficient frontiers, in favor of the risk tolerance frontier. An alternative model that allows for asymmetry is the tracking model, where a portfolio is sought to reproduce a (possibly) asymmetric distribution at lowest cost.     

A chance-constrained portfolio selection model with risk constraints

The paper by Huang [Fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection, Applied Mathematics and Computation 177 (2006) 500-507] proposes a fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection model and presents a numerical example to illustrate the proposed model. In this note, we will show that Huang’s model produces optimal portfolio investing in only one security when candidate security returns are independent to each other no matter how many independent securities are in the market. The reason for concentrative solution is that Huang’s model does not consider the investment risk. To avoid concentrative investment, a risk constraint is added to the fuzzy chance-constrained portfolio selection model. In addition, we point out that the result of the numerical example is inaccurate.     

Delegated portfolio management under ambiguity aversion

We examine the problem of setting optimal incentives for a portfolio manager hired by an investor who wants to induce ambiguity–robust portfolio choices with respect to estimation errors in expected returns. Adopting a worst-case max–min approach we obtain the optimal compensation in various cases where the investor and the manager, adopt or relinquish an ambiguity averse attitude. We also provide examples of applications to real market data.     

Multi-objective decision analysis for competence-oriented project portfolio selection

This paper develops a multi-objective optimization model for project portfolio selection taking employee competencies and their evolution into account. The objectives can include economic gains as well as gains expressed in terms of aggregated competence increments according to pre-defined profiles. In order to determine Pareto-optimal solutions, the overall problem is decomposed into a master problem addressing the portfolio selection itself, and a slave problem dealing with a suitable assignment of personnel to the work packages of the selected projects over time. We provide an asymptotic approximation of the problem by a linearized formulation, which allows an efficient and exact solution of the slave problem. For the solution of the master problem, we compare the multi-objective metaheuristics NSGA-II and P-ACO. Experimental results both for synthetically generated test instances and for real-world test instances, based on an application case from the E-Commerce Competence Center Austria, are presented.     

Robust mean variance portfolio selection model in the jump-diffusion financial market with an intractable claim

In this paper, a continuous-time robust mean variance model in the jump-diffusion financial market with an intractable claim is considered, in which the price processes of the assets not only are driven by the Brownian motion, but also have the Poisson jumps. By combining the martingale representation theorem and the quantile formulation method, an explicit closed-form solution of the robust mean-variance portfolio selection model is given under some suitable assumptions.     

投资组合模型的改进研究:基于企业社会责任视角的实证分析

在尊重和借鉴前人对企业社会责任研究,尤其是在企业社会责任评价研究基础之上,本文从投资者的角度在投资组合过程中研究企业社会责任。在Markowitz(均值—方差)理论模型上添加企业社会责任的三个一级指标期望作为目标函数,由此将传统的投资组合模型扩展为五个目标函数的投资组合选择模型,而且我们根据经济学中经典的效用函数理论证明了此模型的正确性。本文引入主流的企业社会责任评价标准,并对一些典型公司进行打分量化。在此基础之上建立了以期望回报率、回报率的方差、核心利益相关者期望、蛰伏利益相关者期望和边缘利益相关者期望为目标函数的投资组合选择模型,在最小方差曲面上选取10个点构造投资组合,并以样本外的数据验证了模型的有效性。研究发现:根据此模型计算出来的部分投资组合回报率显著高于同期的市场指数。研究结果表明,这种关注企业社会责任的多目标投资组合选择模型,不仅让投资者可以直接控制企业社会责任,而且实际数据证明了此模型的优势之处,从而为关注企业社会责任的投资者提供一种投资的方法和思路。     

Suitable-portfolio investors,nondominated frontier sensitivity,and the effect of multiple objectives on standard portfolio selection

In standard portfolio theory, an investor is typically taken as having one stochastic objective, to maximize the random variable of portfolio return. But in this paper, we focus on investors whose purpose is to build, more broadly, a “suitable portfolio” taking additional concerns into account. Such investors would have additional stochastic and deterministic objectives that might include liquidity, dividends, number of securities in a portfolio, social responsibility, and so forth. To accommodate such investors, we develop a multiple criteria portfolio selection formulation, corroborate its appropriateness by examining the sensitivity of the nondominated frontier to various factors, and observe the conversion of the nondominated frontier to a nondominated surface. Furthermore, multiple criteria enable us to provide an explanation as to why the “market portfolio,” so often found deep below the nondominated frontier, is roughly where one would expect it to be with multiple criteria. After commenting on solvability issues, the paper concludes with the idea that what is the “modern portfolio theory” of today might well be interpreted as a projection onto two-space of a real multiple criteria portfolio selection problem from higher dimensional space. M. Hirschberger: Research conducted while a Visiting Scholar at the Department of Banking and Finance, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, October 2003–March 2004.