Intersubjectivity,relativistic covariance,and conditionals: response to C. I. J. M. Stuart

A misunderstanding persists between Stuart and me, which I do my best to clarify. Bayesian inverse subjectivities versus relativistic covariance and physical intersubjectivity are discussed. A joint number of chances formalism taking care of the propagation of the probability of causes is proposed.     

Study of the 65Cu(n,ɣ)66Cu reaction: M. G. Delfini,J. Kopecky,J. B. M. De Haas,H. I. Liou,R.E. Chrien and P. M. Endt,Nuclear Physics A404 (1983) 250–268

The structure of the “condensed” phase of a finite nucleus is investigated by a HF calculation with a HO-type potential, one-pion-exchange potential and one-rho-meson-exchange potential. The pion field expectation value is also calculated from this nuclear source wave function and compared with the pion field of the normal phase. The time-dependent Schroedinger equation is solved for a certain approximated model of a heavy-ion reaction to see the dynamical growth of the pion field expectation value and its behaviour on such a time scale. The growth of the pion field itself is also investigated to see whether it is a normal growth or that of the condensed phase.