The “golden” algebraic equations

The special case of the (p + 1)th degree algebraic equations of the kind x^p+1 = x^p + 1 (p = 1, 2, 3, …) is researched in the present article. For the case p = 1, the given equation is reduced to the well-known Golden Proportion equation x² = x + 1. These equations are called the golden algebraic equations because the golden p-proportions τ_p, special irrational numbers that follow from Pascal’s triangle, are their roots. A research on the general properties of the roots of the golden algebraic equations is carried out in this article. In particular, formulas are derived for the golden algebraic equations that have degree greater than p + 1. There is reason to suppose that algebraic equations derived by the authors in the present article will interest theoretical physicists. For example, these algebraic equations could be found in the research of the energy relationships within the structures of many compounds and physical particles. For the case of butadiene (C₄H₆), this fact is proved by the famous physicist Richard Feynman.     

The “Error” in the Indian “Taylor Series Approximation” to the Sine

It has been repeatedly noted, but not discussed in detail, that certain so-called “third-order Taylor series approximations” found in the school of the medieval Keralese mathematician M dhava are inaccurate. That is, these formulas, unlike the other series expansions brilliantly developed by M dhava and his followers, do not correspond exactly to the terms of the power series subsequently discovered in Europe, by whose name they are generally known. We discuss a Sanskrit commentary on these rules that suggests a possible derivation explaining this discrepancy, and in the process re-emphasize that the Keralese work on such series was rooted in geometric approximation rather than in analysis per se. © 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).Es ist mehrfach festgestellt bisher aber nicht ausführlich diskutiert worden, daß einige sogenannte Taylor-reihennäherungswerte dritter Ordnung, die in der mittelalterlichen Schule keralesischen M dhava gefunden werden, ungenau sind. Das heißt, diesc Formeln sind den Termen der Potenzreihe, die später in Europa entwickelt wurde und unter dem Namen Taylorreihe bekannt ist, nicht äquivalent, im Gegensatz zu den anderen Entwicklungen von Reihen, die glänzend von M dhava und seinen Nachfolgern entwickelt werden. Wir behandeln einen Sanskritkommentar zu den Regeln, der eine mögliche Herleitung suggeriert, die diese Diskrepanz erklärt. Dabei betonen wir nochmals, daß die keralesische Arbeit über solche Reihen eher in geometrischen Näherungen als in der Analysis an sich ihre Wurzeln hat. © 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).MSC subject classification: 01A32.     

On “bent” functions

Let P(x) be a function from GF(2ⁿ) to GF(2). P(x) is called “bent” if all Fourier coefficients of (−1)^P(x) are ±1. The polynomial degree of a bent function P(x) is studied, as are the properties of the Fourier transform of (−1)^P(x), and a connection with Hadamard matrices.     

Non-recursive functions,knots “with thick ropes,” and self-clenching “thick” hyperspheres

We introduce an approach to certain geometric variational problems based on the use of the algorithmic unrecognizability of the n-dimensional sphere for n ≥ 5. Sometimes this approach allows one to prove the existence of infinitely many solutions of a considered variational problem. This recursion-theoretic approach is applied in this paper to a class of functionals on the space of C^1.1-smooth hypersurfaces diffeomorphic to Sⁿ in Rⁿ⁺¹, where n is any fixed number ≥ 5. The simplest of these functionals k_v is defined by the formula k_v(Σⁿ) = (vol(Σⁿ))^1/n/r(Σⁿ), where r(Σⁿ) denotes the radius of injectivity of the normal exponential map for Σⁿ ? Rⁿ+l. We prove the existence of an infinite set of distinct locally minimal values of k_v on the space of C^1.1-smooth topological hyperspheres in Rⁿ⁺¹ for any n ≥ 5. The functional k_v naturally arises when one attempts to generalize knot theory in order to deal with embeddings and isotopies of “thick” circles and, more generally, “thick” spheres into Euclidean spaces. We introduce the notion of knot “with thick rope” types. The theory of knot “with thick rope” types turns out to be quite different from the classical knot theory because of the following result: There exists an infinite set of non-trivial knot “with thick rope” types in codimension one for every dimension greater than or equal to five.     

The “weight” of models and complexity

This article introduces a way of measuring the intrinsic complexity of models. Unlike complication, complexity is an irreducible indication of the innate characteristics of models. Instead of a reductionist paradigm, complexity should be measured in a holistic way. This article redefines the relationship between models and data, and proposes the concept of the “weight” of models, that is, how “heavy” a model is. Based on this concept, this article further defines the complexity of a model to be its ability to distort the space configuration. Three complexity indices are proposed to quantify the extent to which the input space is distorted by a model. It is recognized that there is a lack of widely accepted definition or measure of model complexity. The answer provided by this article is an attempt to move the inquiry a step closer to that goal. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity 21: 21–35, 2016