Polysiloxane‐Backbone Block Copolymers in a One‐Pot Synthesis: A Silicone Platform for Facile Functionalization

Block copolymers consisting exclusively of a silicon–oxygen backbone are synthesized by sequential anionic ring‐opening polymerization of different cyclic siloxane monomers. After formation of a poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) block by butyllithium‐initiated polymerization of D3, a functional second block is generated by subsequent addition of tetramethyl tetravinyl cyclotetrasiloxane (D4^V), resulting in diblock copolymers comprised a simple PDMS block and a functional poly(methylvinylsiloxane) (PMVS) block. Polymers of varying block length ratios were obtained and characterized. The vinyl groups of the second block can be easily modified with a variety of side chains using hydrosilylation chemistry to attach compounds with Si—H bond. Conversion of the hydrosilylation used for polymer modification was investigated.     

One‐Pot Automated Synthesis of Quasi Triblock Copolymers for Self‐Healing Physically Crosslinked Hydrogels

The preparation of physically crosslinked hydrogels from quasi ABA‐triblock copolymers with a water‐soluble middle block and hydrophobic end groups is reported. The hydrophilic monomer N‐acryloylmorpholine is copolymerized with hydrophobic isobornyl acrylate via a one‐pot sequential monomer addition through reversible addition fragmentation chain‐transfer (RAFT) polymerization in an automated parallel synthesizer, allowing systematic variation of polymer chain length and hydrophobic–hydrophilic ratio. Hydrophobic interactions between the outer blocks cause them to phase‐separate into larger hydrophobic domains in water, forming physical crosslinks between the polymers. The resulting hydrogels are studied using rheology and their self‐healing ability after large strain damage is shown.

     

Amphiphilic Block Copolymers from a Direct and One‐pot RAFT Synthesis in Water

The syntheses of amphiphilic block copolymers are successfully performed in water by chain extension of hydrophilic macromolecules with styrene at 80 °C. The employed strategy is a one‐pot procedure in which poly(acrylic acid), poly(methacrylic acid) or poly(methacrylic acid‐co‐poly(ethylene oxide) methyl ether methacrylate) macroRAFTs are first formed in water using 4‐cyano‐4‐thiothiopropylsulfanyl pentanoic acid (CTPPA) as a chain transfer agent. The resulting macroRAFTs are then directly used without further purification for the RAFT polymerization of styrene in water in the same reactor. This simple and straightforward strategy leads to a very good control of the resulting amphiphilic block copolymers.

     

One‐pot synthesis of well‐defined multiblock polymer: Combination of ATRP and RAFT polymerization involving cyclic trithiocarbonate

Multiblock polymers were prepared by combination of ATRP (CuBr/tris[(2‐pyridyl)methyl]amine) and RAFT polymerization involving cyclic trithiocarbonate (CTTC). In the combined polymerization system, the ATRP was introduced as constant radical source, CTTC underwent ring‐opening polymerization, and the incorporated trithiocarbonate moieties derived from CTTCs performed as RAFT agent. Through the integrated process, multiblock polymers containing predictable average block number together with controlled molecular weight of the blocks were prepared by one‐pot polymerization. The average block number of polymer was controlled by concentration ratio of CTTC to alkyl halide in ARTP, and the molecular weight of block were well regulated by concentration of CTTC and monomer conversion. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 2425–2429, 2010     

A Rare Example of the Formation of Polystyrene‐Grafted Aliphatic Polyester in One‐Pot by Radical Polymerization

The radical copolymerization of cyclic ester β‐propiolactone (β‐PL) with styrene (St) at 120 °C, with a complete range of monomer ratios, is a rare example of a system providing graft copolymers (PSt‐g‐β‐PL) in one pot. The structure of the resulting β‐PL–St copolymers was proven by using a combination of different characterization techniques, such as 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography (GPC), before and after alkaline hydrolysis of the polymers. The number of grafting points increased with an increasing amount of β‐PL in the feed. A significant difference in the reactivity of St and β‐PL and radical chain‐transfer reactions at the polystyrene (PSt) backbone, followed by combination with the active growing poly(β‐PL) chains, led to the formation of graft copolymers by a grafting‐onto mechanism.     

Synthesis of Well‐Defined Rod‐Coil‐Rod Polyhexylisocyanate‐block‐polystyrene‐block‐polyhexylisocyanate via One‐Pot Anionic Polymerization

A rod‐coil‐rod block copolymer, polyhexylisocyanate‐block‐polystyrene‐block‐polyhexylisocyanate, of controlled molecular weight was synthesized quantitatively via living anionic polymerization using potassium naphthalenide in the presence of sodium tetraphenylborate. The use of K⁺ as the counterion for the polymerization of styrene, and Na⁺ (NaBPh₄) for the polymerization of isocyanate leads to the formation of a well‐controlled novel triblock copolymer.

     

Controlled Alternating Copolymerization of (Meth)acrylates and Vinyl Ethers by Using Organoheteroatom‐Mediated Living Radical Polymerization

Alternating copolymers comprised of (meth)acrylates and vinyl ethers with controlled molecular weights and polydispersities were synthesized for the first time by living radical polymerization using organotellurium, stibine, and bismuthine chain transfer agents. Combining living alternating copolymerization and living radical or living cationic polymerization afforded hitherto unavailable block copolymers with controlled macromolecular structures.

     

A Theoretical Exploration of the Potential of ICAR ATRP for One‐ and Two‐Pot Synthesis of Well‐Defined Diblock Copolymers

Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations are performed to investigate the capability of ICAR ATRP for the synthesis of well‐defined poly(isobornyl acrylate‐b‐styrene) block(‐like) copolymers using one‐pot semi‐batch and two‐pot batch procedures. The block copolymer quality is quantified via a block deviation (〈BD〉) value. For 〈BD〉 values lower than 0.30, the quality is defined as good and for well‐chosen polymerization conditions the formation of homopolymer chains upon addition of the second monomer can be suppressed. A better block quality is obtained when isobornyl acrylate is polymerized first. For lower Cu levels a one‐pot semi‐batch procedure allows a much faster ATRP and better control over the polymer properties than a two‐pot batch procedure.

     

α‐Cyanobenzyl dithioester reversible addition–fragmentation chain‐transfer agents for controlled radical polymerizations

A series of new reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agents with cyanobenzyl R groups were synthesized. In comparison with other dithioester RAFT agents, these new RAFT agents were odorless or low‐odor, and this made them much easier to handle. The kinetics of methyl methacrylate radical polymerizations mediated by these RAFT agents were investigated. The polymerizations proceeded in a controlled way, the first‐order kinetics evolved in a linear fashion with time, the molecular weights increased linearly with the conversions, and the polydispersities were very narrow (～1.1). A poly[(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene] block copolymer was prepared (number‐average molecular weight = 42,600, polydispersity index = 1.21) from a poly(methyl methacrylate) macro‐RAFT agent. These new RAFT agents also showed excellent control over the radical polymerization of styrenics and acrylates. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 1535–1543, 2005     

One‐Pot Glovebox‐Free Synthesis,Characterization, and Self‐Assembly of Novel Amphiphilic Poly(Sarcosine‐b‐Caprolactone) Diblock Copolymers

Novel amphiphilic polypeptoid‐polyester diblock copolymers based on poly(sarcosine) (PSar) and poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) are synthesized by a one‐pot glovebox‐free approach. In this method, sarcosine N‐carboxy anhydride (Sar‐NCA) is firstly polymerized in the presence of benzylamine under N₂ flow, then the resulting poly(sarcosine) is used in situ as the macro­initiator for the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) of ε‐caprolactone using tin(II) octanoate as a catalyst. The degree of poly­merization of each block is controlled by various feed ratios of monomer/initiator. The diblock copolymers with controlled molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distributions (Đ_M < 1.2) are characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and size‐exclusion chromatography. The self‐assembly behavior of PSar‐b‐PCL in water is investigated by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy. DLS results reveal that the diblock copolymers associate into nanoparticles with average hydrodynamic diameters (D_H) around 100 nm in water, which may be used as drug delivery carriers.

     

Block Copolymerization of Lactide and an Epoxide Facilitated by a Redox Switchable Iron‐Based Catalyst

A cationic iron(III) complex was active for the polymerization of various epoxides, whereas the analogous neutral iron(II) complex was inactive. Cyclohexene oxide polymerization could be “switched off” upon in situ reduction of the iron(III) catalyst and “switched on” upon in situ oxidation, which is orthogonal to what was observed previously for lactide polymerization. Conducting copolymerization reactions in the presence of both monomers resulted in block copolymers whose identity can be controlled by the oxidation state of the catalyst: selective lactide polymerization was observed in the iron(II) oxidation state and selective epoxide polymerization was observed in the iron(III) oxidation state. Evidence for the formation of block copolymers was obtained from solubility differences, GPC, and DOSY‐NMR studies.     

One‐pot synthesis of ABC miktoarm star terpolymers by coupling ATRP,ROP, and click chemistry techniques

We report on the one‐pot synthesis of well‐defined ABC miktoarm star terpolymers consisting of poly(2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate), poly(ε‐caprolactone), and polystyrene or poly(ethylene oxide) arms, PS(‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA and PEO (‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA, taking advantage of the compatibility and mutual tolerability of reaction conditions (catalysts and monomers) employed for atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), ring‐opening polymerization (ROP), and click reactions. At first, a novel trifunctional core molecule bearing alkynyl, hydroxyl group, and bromine moieties, alkynyl(? OH)? Br, was synthesized via the esterification reaction of 5‐ethyl‐5‐hydroxymethyl‐2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxane with 4‐oxo‐4‐(prop‐2‐ynyloxy)butanoic acid, followed by deprotection and monoesterification of alkynyl(? OH)₂ with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. In the presence of trifunctional core molecule, alkynyl(? OH)? Br, and CuBr/PMDETA/Sn(Oct)₂ catalytic mixtures, target ABC miktoarm star terpolymers, PS(‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA and PEO(‐b‐PCL)‐b‐PDMA, were successfully synthesized in a one‐pot manner by simultaneously conducting the ATRP of 2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMA), ROP of ε‐caprolactone (ε‐CL), and the click reaction with azido‐terminated PS (PS‐N₃) or azido‐terminated PEO (PEO‐N₃). Considering the excellent tolerability of ATRP to a variety of monomers and the fast expansion of click chemistry in the design and synthesis of polymeric and biorelated materials, it is quite anticipated that the one‐pot concept can be applied to the preparation of well‐defined polymeric materials with more complex chain architectures. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 3066–3077, 2009     

RAFT‐Mediated Polymerization‐Induced Self‐Assembly

After a brief history that positions polymerization‐induced self‐assembly (PISA) in the field of polymer chemistry, this Review will cover the fundamentals of the PISA mechanism. Furthermore, this Review will also give an overview of some of the features and limitations of RAFT‐mediated PISA in terms of the choice of the components involved, the nature of the nanoobjects that can be obtained and how the syntheses can be controlled, as well as some potential applications.     

Synthesis of poly(tert‐butyl acrylate‐block‐vinyl acetate) copolymers by combining ATRP and RAFT polymerizations

The synthesis of poly(tert‐butyl acrylate‐block‐vinyl acetate) copolymers using a combination of two living radical polymerization techniques, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, is reported. The use of two methods is due to the disparity in reactivity of the two monomers, viz. vinyl acetate is difficult to polymerize via ATRP, and a suitable RAFT agent that can control the polymerization of vinyl acetate is typically unable to control the polymerization of tert‐butyl acrylate. Thus, ATRP was performed to make poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) containing a bromine end group. This end group was subsequently substituted with a xanthate moiety. Various spectroscopic methods were used to confirm the substitution. The poly(tert‐butyl acrylate) macro‐RAFT agent was then used to produce (tert‐butyl acrylate‐block‐vinyl acetate). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 7200–7206, 2008     

Micelles Formed by Cylindrical Brush‐Coil Block Copolymers

Summary: Amphiphilic cylindrical brush‐coil block copolymers consisting of a polystyrene coil and a cylindrical brush block with poly(acrylic acid) side chains are prepared by ATRP of t‐butylacrylate from a block comacroinitiator. Upon acidolysis of the poly(t‐butylacrylate), water‐soluble polymers were obtained that were observed to form micelles consisting of 4–5 block copolymers on average in aqueous solution. The star‐like nature of such micelles was clearly visualized by scanning force microscopy.

Schematic of coil‐cylindrical brush block copolymer PS‐b‐(PⁱBEMA‐g‐PAA), its AFM image clearly showing the main chain and the PAA corona of the cylindrical brush block.     

A One‐Step Route to CO2‐Based Block Copolymers by Simultaneous ROCOP of CO2/Epoxides and RAFT Polymerization of Vinyl Monomers

The one‐step synthesis of well‐defined CO₂‐based diblock copolymers was achieved by simultaneous ring‐opening copolymerization (ROCOP) of CO₂/epoxides and RAFT polymerization of vinyl monomers using a trithiocarbonate compound bearing a carboxylic group (TTC‐COOH) as the bifunctional chain transfer agent (CTA). The double chain‐transfer effect allows for independent and precise control over the molecular weight of the two blocks and ensures narrow polydispersities of the resultant block copolymers (1.09–1.14). Notably, an unusual axial group exchange reaction between the aluminum porphyrin catalyst and TTC‐COOH impedes the formation of homopolycarbonates. By taking advantage of the RAFT technique, it is able to meet the stringent demand for functionality control to well expand the application scopes of CO₂‐based polycarbonates.     

Super impact strength of blends prepared from regular HIPS and poly(butyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(styrene) obtained by RAFT polymerization

S‐allyl‐4‐methyldithiobenzoate was synthesized and used as a chain transfer agent for the RAFT polymerization of butyl acrylate to produce a functionalized acrylic rubber. A solution of 8 wt% of this functionalized rubber was prepared in styrene and polymerized to generate a material called acrylic rubber‐modified polystyrene (AMP) constituted by well‐dispersed particles of poly(butyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(styrene) into a polystyrene matrix. Impact strength of injection‐molded samples of AMP was measured and compared with the general purpose polystyrene (GPPS) and the high impact polystyrene (HIPS). AMP itself showed an impact strength value similar to GPPS; however, when AMP was blended with conventional HIPS, the resulting material exhibited an improvement of 76–91% as compared to HIPS by itself, without affecting negatively tensile properties. Transmission electron microscopy analysis revealed both kinds of dispersed phases, i.e. the typical salami particles of polybutadiene coming from HIPS (size: 0.5–2 µ) and small particles from poly(butyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(styrene) (size: ～50 nm). We clearly showed that such a bimodality of the particle size distribution caused the positive synergistic effect on impact strength. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.