Existence of stable equilibrium point for dynamical systems of Volterra type

This paper presents sufficient conditions for the existence of a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point of a dynamical system of Volterra type, (1) $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{) x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) = ?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)[f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{(t),…, x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)) ? q}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{], i = 1,…, n}$, for every q = (q₁,…, q_n)^T?Rⁿ. Results of a nonlinear complementarity problem are applied to obtain the conditions. System (1) has a nonnegative and stable equilibrium point if (i) f(x) = (f₁(x),…,f_n(x))^T is a continuous and differentiable M-function and it satisfies a certain surjectivity property, or (ii), f(x) is continuous and strongly monotone on R₊₀ⁿ.     

A generalization of Lavoie's inequality concerning the sum of idempotent matrices

Let a complex pxn matrix A be partitioned as A′=(A′₁,A′₂,…,A′_k). Denote by ?(A), A′, and A^? respectively the rank of A, the transpose of A, and an inner inverse (or a g-inverse) of A. Let A⁽¹⁴⁾ be an inner inverse of A such that A⁽¹⁴⁾A is a Hermitian matrix. Let B=(A⁽¹⁴⁾₁,A⁽¹⁴⁾₂,…,A_k⁽¹⁴⁾) and $\text{ρ(A)=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{k}\text{ρ(A}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$.Then the product of nonzero eigenvalues of BA (or AB) cannot exceed one, and the product of nonzero eigenvalues of BA is equal to one if and only if either B=A⁽¹⁴⁾ or $\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{i>}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>j</mtext>}}{}^1\text{=0}$ for all i ≠ j,i, j=1,2,…,k . The results of Lavoie (1980) and Styan (1981) are obtained as particular cases. A result is obtained for k=2 when the condition $\text{ρ(A)=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{k}\text{ρ(A}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ is no longer true.     

The probability that k positive integers are relatively r-prime

If r, k are positive integers, then $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples of positive integers (x₁, x₂, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r = 1. An explicit formula for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}$ is derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{ζ(rk)}$.If S = {p₁, p₂, …, p_a} is a finite set of primes, then 〈S〉 = {p₁^a₁p₂^a₂…p_s^a_s; p_i ∈ S and a_i ≥ 0 for all i} and $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ denotes the number of k-tuples (x₁, x₃, …, x_k) with 1 ≤ x_i ≤ n and (x₁, x₂, …, x_k)_r ∈ 〈S〉. Asymptotic formulas for $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}$ are derived and it is shown that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{(S, n)}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(p}{}_1\text{… p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{ζ(rk)(p}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1) … (p}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{rk}}\text{? 1)}$.     

Permutation-operator inequalities on certain symmetry classes of tensors

If A∈T(m, N), the real-valued N-linear functions on E_m, and σ∈S_N, the symmetric group on {…,N}, then we define the permutation operator P_σ: T(m, N) → T(m, N) such that P_σ(A)(x₁,x₂,…,x_N = A(x_σ(1),x_σ(2),…, x_σ(N)). Suppose Σ^q_i=1n_i = N, where the n_i are positive integers. In this paper we present a condition on σ that is sufficient to guarantee that 〈P_σ(A₁?A₂???A_q),A₁?A₂?? ? A_q〉 ? 0 for A_i∈S(m, n_i), where S(m, n_i) denotes the subspace of T(m, n_i) consisting of all the fully symmetric members of T(m, n_i). Also we present a broad generalization of the Neuberger identity which is sometimes useful in answering questions of the type described below. Suppose G and H are subgroups of S_N. We let T_G(m, N) denote all A∈T(m, N) such that P_σ(A) = A for all σ∈G. We define the symmetrizer $\text{S}$_G: T(m, N)→T_G(m,N) such that $\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{G}}\text{(A) = 1/|G|Σ}{}_{\mathrm{\sigma \in G}}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{\sigma }}\text{(A)}$. Suppose H is a subgroup of G and A∈T_H(m, N). Clearly $\text{6}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>G</mtext>}}\text{6(A) 6? 6A6.}$ We are interested in the reverse type of comparison. In particular, if D is a suitably chosen subset of T_H(m,N), then can we explicitly present a constant C>0 such that $\text{6}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{G}}\text{(A)6?C6A6}$ for all A∈D?     

On some properties of the Cesàro limit of a stochastic matrix

Let$\text{?(x}{}_1\text{,…,x}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{)}$ be a polynomial in the variables x1,…,xp with nonnegative real coefficients which sum to one, let A1,…,Ap be stochastic matrices, and let $\text{?}\text{?}\text{(A}{}_1\text{,…,A}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{)}$ be the stochastic matrix which is obtained from ? by substituting the Kronecker product of An11,…,Anppfor each term Xn11·?·Xnpp. In this paper, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for the Cesàro limit of the sequence of the powers of $\text{?}\text{?}\text{(A}{}_1\text{,…,A}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{)}$ to be equal to the Kronecker product of the Cesàro limits associated with each of A1,…,Ap. These conditions show that the equality of these two matrices depends only on the number of ergodic sets under$\text{?}\text{?}\text{(A}{}_1\text{,…,A}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{)}$ and?or the cyclic structure of the ergodic sets under A1,…,Ap, respectively. As a special case of these results, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the interchangeability of the Kronecker product and the Cesàro limit operator.     

Infinite-variate wide-sense Markov processes and functional analysis for bounded operator-forming vectors

Let p, q be arbitrary parameter sets, and let $\text{H}$ be a Hilbert space. We say that x = (xⁱ)_i?q, xⁱ ? $\text{H}$, is a bounded operator-forming vector (?$\text{H}$_F^q) if the Gram matrix 〈x, x〉 = [(xⁱ, x^j)]_i?q,j?q is the matrix of a bounded (necessarily ≥ 0) operator on $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$, the Hilbert space of square-summable complex-valued functions on q. Let A be p × q, i.e., let A be a linear operator from $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$ to $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{p}}{}^2$. Then exists a linear operator ǎ from (the Banach space) $\text{H}$_F^q to $\text{H}$_F^p on $\text{D}$(A) = {x:x ? $\text{H}$_F^q, $\text{A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is p × q bounded on $\text{l}{}_{\mathrm{q}}{}^2$} such that y = ǎx satisfies y^j?σ(x) = {space spanned by the xⁱ}, 〈y, x〉 = A〈x, x〉 and $\text{〈y, y〉 = A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(A〈x, x〉}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}{}^1$. This is a generalization of our earlier [J. Multivariate Anal.4 (1974), 166–209; 6 (1976), 538–571] results for the case of a spectral measure concentrated on one point. We apply these tools to investigate q-variate wide-sense Markov processes.     

Decomposability of symmetric multilinear functions

Let V denote a finite dimensional vector space over a field K of characteristic 0, let T_n(V) denote the vector space whose elements are the K-valued n-linear functions on V, and let S_n(V) denote the subspace of T_n(V) whose members are the fully symmetric members of T_n(V). If $\text{L}$_n denotes the symmetric group on {1,2,…,n} then we define the projection $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{: T}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V) → S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(V)}$ by the formula , where P_σ : T_n(V) → T_n(V) is defined so that P_σ(A)(y₁,y₂,…,y_n = A(y_σ(1),y_σ(2),…,y_σ(n)) for each A?T_n(V) and y_i?V, 1 ? i ? n. If $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, then x₁?x₂? … ?x_n denotes the member of T_n(V) such that $\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{· ? ? ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)(y}{}_1\text{,y}{}_2\text{,…,y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{) = П}{}^{\mathrm{n}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ for each y₁ ,₂,…,y_n in V, and x₁·x₂… x_n denotes $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{?x}{}_2\text{? … ?x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$. If B? S_n(V) and there exists $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? V}{}^1\text{, 1 ? i ? n}$, such that B = x₁·x₂…x_n, then B is said to be decomposable. We present two sets of necessary and sufficient conditions for a member B of S_n(V) to be decomposable. One of these sets is valid for an arbitrary field of characteristic zero, while the other requires that K = R or C.     

Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

Strong law for the bootstrap

Let X₁, X₂, X₃, … be i.i.d. r.v. with E|X₁| < ∞, E X₁ = μ. Given a realization X = (X₁,X₂,…) and integers n and m, construct Y_n,i, i = 1, 2, …, m as i.i.d. r.v. with conditional distribution $\text{P}{}^1\text{(Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}\text{= X}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{) =}\text{1}\text{n}$ for 1 ? j ? n. ($\text{P}{}^1$ denotes conditional distribution given X). Conditions relating the growth rate of m with n and the moments of X₁ are given to ensure the almost sure convergence of $\text{(}\text{1}\text{m}\text{)Σ}{}^{\mathrm{m}}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{n,i}}$ toμ. This equation is of some relevance in the theory of Bootstrap as developed by Efron (1979) and Bickel and Freedman (1981).     

Matrix extensions of Liouville-Dirichlet-type integrals

The Dirichlet integral provides a formula for the volume over the k-dimensional simplex ω={x₁,…,x_k: x_i?0, i=1,…,k, s?∑^k₁x_i?T}. This integral was extended by Liouville. The present paper provides a matrix analog where now the region becomes $\text{Ω={V}{}_1\text{,…,V}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{: V}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{>0, i=1,…,k, 0?∑V}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?t}}$, where now each V_i is a p×p symmetric matrix and A?B means that A?B is positive semidefinite.     

Definition and characterization of multivariate negative binomial distribution

The probability generating function (pgf) of an n-variate negative binomial distribution is defined to be [β(s₁,…,s_n)]^?k where β is a polynomial of degree n being linear in each s_i and k > 0. This definition gives rise to two characterizations of negative binomial distributions. An n-variate linear exponential distribution with the probability function h(x₁,…,x_n)$\text{exp}\text{(}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i=1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{θ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}\text{f(θ}{}_1\text{,…,θ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ is negative binomial if and only if its univariate marginals are negative binomial. Let S_t, t = 1,…, m, be subsets of {s₁,…, s_n} with empty ∩_t=1^mS_t. Then an n-variate pgf is of a negative binomial if and only if for all s in S_t being fixed the function is of the form of the pgf of a negative binomial in other s's and this is true for all t.     

Minimax estimators for a multinormal precision matrix

Let S_p×p ～ Wishart (Σ, k), Σ unknown, k > p + 1. Minimax estimators of Σ^?1 are given for L₁, an Empirical Bayes loss function; and L₂, a standard loss function (R_i ≡ E(L_i ∣ Σ), i = 1, 2). The estimators are $\text{Σ}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+}\text{br}\text{(S)I}{}_{\mathrm{p\times p}}$, a, b ≥ 0, r(·) a functional on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>p(p+2)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$. Stein, Efron, and Morris studied the special cases $\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{(E}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k?p?1</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{)}$ and $\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+ (b/tr S)I}$, for certain, a, b. From their work $\text{R}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤ R}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$, a = k ? p ? 1, b = p² + p ? 2; whereas, we prove $\text{R}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$. The reversal is surprising because $\text{L}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) →}\text{L}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S)}$ a.e. (for a particular L₂). Assume $\text{R}$ (compact) ? $\text{S}$, $\text{S}$ the set of p × p p.s.d. matrices. A “divergence theorem” on functions F_p×p : $\text{R}$ → $\text{S}$ implies identities for R_i, i = 1, 2. Then, conditions are given for $\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$, i = 1, 2. Most of our results concern estimators with r(S) = t(U)/tr(S), U = p ∣S∣^1/p/tr(S).     

On differences and sums of integers,I

A set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} ? {1,2,…,N} is said to be a difference intersector set if {a₁,a₂,…,a_s} ? {1,2,…,N}, j > ?N imply the solvability of the equation a_x ? a_y = b′; the notion of sum intersector set is defined similarly. The authors prove two general theorems saying that if a set {b₁,b₂,…,b_i} is well distributed simultaneously among and within all residue classes of small moduli then it must be both difference and sum intersector set. They apply these theorems to investigate the solvability of the equations ($\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{p}\text{= + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{u}}\text{?}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{p}\text{) = + 1}$, $\text{(a}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{z}}\text{p}\text{) = ? 1}$ (where ($\text{a}\text{p}$) denotes the Legendre symbol) and to show that “almost all” sets form both difference and sum intersector sets.     

A method of feasible directions using function approximations,with applications to min max problems

This paper presents a demonstrably convergent method of feasible directions for solving the problem min{φ(ξ)| gⁱ(ξ)?0i=1,2,…,m}, which approximates, adaptively, both φ(x) and ▽φ(x). These approximations are necessitated by the fact that in certain problems, such as when $\text{φ(x) =}\text{max}\text{{f(x, y) ¦ y ? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{}}$, a precise evaluation of φ(x) and ▽φ(x) is extremely costly. The adaptive procedure progressively refines the precision of the approximations as an optimum is approached and as a result should be much more efficient than fixed precision algorithms.It is outlined how this new algorithm can be used for solving problems of the form $\text{min}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{max}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{? Ω}{}_{\mathrm{y}}\text{f(x, y)}$ under the assumption that Ωm_ξ={x|gⁱ(x)?0, j=1,…,s} ∩$\text{R}$ⁿ, Ω_y={y|ζ_i(y)?0, i-1,…,t} ∩ $\text{R}$^m, with f, g^j, ζⁱ continuously differentiable, f(x, ·) concave, ζⁱ convex for $\text{i = 1,…, t,}\text{and}\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{, Ω}{}_{\mathrm{y}}$ compact.     

Positive dependence properties of elliptically symmetric distributions

Let X₁, …, X_p have p.d.f. g(x₁² + … + x_p²). It is shown that (a) X₁, …, X_p are positively lower orthant dependent or positively upper orthant dependent if, and only if, X₁,…, X_p are i.i.d. N(0, σ²); and (b) the p.d.f. of |X₁|,…, |X_p| is TP₂ in pairs if, and only if, In g(u) is convex. Let X₁, X₂ have p.d.f. $\text{f(x}{}_1\text{, x}{}_2\text{) =}\text{|Σ|}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{g((x}{}_1\text{, x}{}_2\text{)}\text{Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{(x}{}_1\text{, x}{}_2\text{)′)}$. Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for f(x₁, x₂) to be TP₂ for fixed correlation ?. It is shown that if f is TP₂ for all ? >0. then (X₁, X₂)′ ～ N(0, Σ). Related positive dependence results and applications are also considered.     

Author index

A matrix T=(t_ik) is introduced, the coefficients of which are defined by $\text{k}{}_{\mathrm{ik}}\text{:= (}\text{i}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(ik)!)}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{x?S}}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{, i, k?N={1, 2, 3,…,}}$, where a_i(x) denotes the s the number of i cycles in the element x of the symmetric group S_n. It is shown that these numbers are natural numbers, that they are easy to evaluate, and that they serve very well in order to formulate an infinite number of characterizations of multiply transitive subgroups of symmetric groups in terms of the cycle structure of their elements.     

Some optimization problems with applications to canonical correlations and sphericity tests

Optimization problems are connected with maximization of three functions, namely, geometric mean, arithmetic mean and harmonic mean of the eigenvalues of (X′ΣX)^?1ΣY(Y′ΣY)^?1Y′ΣX, where Σ is positive definite, X and Y are p × r and p × s matrices of ranks r and s (≥r), respectively, and X′Y = 0. Some interpretations of these functions are given. It is shown that the maximum values of these functions are obtained at the same point given by X = (h₁ + ?₁h_p, …, h_r + ?_rh_p?r+1) and $\text{Y = (h}{}_1\text{? ?}{}_1\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{, …, h}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{? ?}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{h}{}_{\mathrm{p?r+1}}\text{,}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{r+1}}\text{, …,}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)}$, where h₁, …, h_p are the eigenvectors of Σ corresponding to the eigenvalues λ₁ ≥ λ₂ ≥ … ≥ λ_p > 0, ?_j = +1 or ?1 for j = 1,2,…, r and $\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{r+1}}\text{, …,}\text{Y}{}_{\mathrm{s}}$, are linear functions of h_r+1,…, h_p?r. These results are extended to intermediate stationary values. They are utilized in obtaining the inequalities for canonical correlations θ₁,…,θ_r and they are given by expressions (3.8)–(3.10). Further, some new union-intersection test procedures for testing the sphericity hypothesis are given through test statistics (3.11)–(3.13).