Elementary mathematics specialists in “departmentalized” teaching assignments: Affordances and constraints

In this article, we describe the experiences of three Elementary Mathematics Specialists (EMS) who were part of a larger project investigating the impact of EMS certification and assignment (self-contained or “departmentalized”) on teaching practices and student achievement outcomes. All three of the teachers were “departmentalized,” in the sense that each was responsible for teaching mathematics to at least two groups of students, and accordingly, did not teach all subjects as would a typical self-contained elementary teacher. Each teacher had recently earned an Elementary Mathematics Specialist certificate through completion of a 24-credit, graduate-level program designed to build pedagogical content knowledge and leadership capacity in mathematics. Through a series of observations and interviews over the course of one school year, we examined how the teachers described and navigated specific affordances and constraints they encountered in their particular contexts. Common affordances included opportunities to revise and learn from instruction, and constraints included reduced flexibility introduced by the need to schedule multiple classes of mathematics. Despite these common features, we found important differences between the three models of departmentalization, which we describe as team approach, class swap, and grade-level mathematics teacher. For example, some of the models provided more opportunities for collaboration while others made it difficult for teachers to address potential inequities in learning opportunities across sections. Despite the constraints of their respective models, we found evidence of the EMS-certified teachers drawing on professional expertise in mathematics to meet student needs.     

Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: its structure and how it varies across six countries

Cross-national research studies such as the Program for International Student Assessment and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have contributed much to our understandings regarding country differences in student achievement in mathematics, especially at the primary (elementary) and lower secondary (middle school) levels. TIMSS, especially, has demonstrated the central role that the concept of opportunity to learn plays in understanding cross-national differences in achievement Schmidt et al., (Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning  2001). The curricular expectations of a nation and the actual content exposure that is delivered to students by teachers were found to be among the most salient features of schooling related to academic performance. The other feature that emerges in these studies is the importance of the teacher. The professional competence of the teacher which includes substantive knowledge regarding formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy is suggested as being significant—not just in understanding cross-national differences but also in other studies as well (Hill et al. in Am Educ Res J 42(2):371–406, 2005). Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) is a small, six-country study that collected data on future lower secondary teachers in their last year of preparation. One of the findings noted in the first report of that study was that the opportunities future teachers experienced as part of their formal education varied across the six countries (Schmidt et al. in The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries, 2007). This variation in opportunity to learn (OTL) existed in course work related to formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy. It appears from these initial results that OTL not only is important in understanding K-12 student learning but it is also likely important in understanding the knowledge base of the teachers who teach them which then has the potential to influence student learning as well. This study using the same MT21 data examines in greater detail the configuration of the educational opportunities future teachers had during their teacher education in some 34 institutions across the six countries.     

The Border Crossings of a Multicultural Science Education Enthusiast

Jill was a preservice science education student who wanted to make science more accessible to all students. This study is an examination of the “borders” she encountered as she completed her student teaching in a cultural setting that was different from her own. Her student teaching experience was documented through interviews, participant observations, field notes, lesson plans, and a journal. An inductive analysis of the documents and a context chart of the coded data revealed that Jill encountered the (a) cultural border of her students, (b) cultural border of science instruction, and (c) cultural border of the school. While some borders were crossed, others were not. This study suggests that during field experiences, preservice teachers may encounter multiple cultural borders, some consistent and some inconsistent with their instructional philosophy. As student teachers work with diverse populations, supervisors and cooperating teachers need to recognize the borders student teachers will encounter and encourage student teachers to examine their beliefs about practice as a means to acknowledge and understand the encountered borders.     

Expanding in-service mathematics teachers’ horizons in creative work using technology

This article describes the experiences gained from a seminar in the teaching of mathematical reasoning and problem solving designed to prepare in-service high school mathematics teachers to teach genuine mathematical activity in a computer-based environment. Presented with a set of unfamiliar tasks and activities, the participants were encouraged to investigate each of them, using the Geometer's Sketchpad software, and then to justify their assertions accordingly. In the exploratory process the student teachers make the major mathematical contributions while the teacher plays the role of facilitator. The mathematics teachers began to realize the power of technology in teaching mathematics and were pleased to return to their classrooms with a great number of experiences and ideas for immediate use.     

Progressive, classical or balanced— A look at mathematical learning environments in Swiss-German lower-secondary schools

In a national supplement to TIMSS, lower-secondary school teachers (N=102) and their students (N=975) reported on mathematics instruction by means of a teacher questionnaire (teaching-learning methods, instructional sub-goals, facilitated student activities, achievement assessment, teacher role) and a student questionnaire (teachers' instructional proficiency, classroom climate). A cluster analysis performed on the ratings of teaching-learning methods yielded a solution with three clusters referred to as progressive, classical, and balanced learning environment. Cluster-related differences in facilitated student activities, achievement evaluation and preferred teacher role were found but not in instructional sub-goals. Students from different learning environments equally approved teachers' instructional proficiency and classroom climate and also had similar TIMSS mathematics scores. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that in addition to classical teacher-centered learning environments there seem to exist more diversified and studentcentered learning environments that address the needs for students to direct their own learning, communicate and work with others, and develop ways of dealing with complex problems. In line with the research literature it was also found that high mathematics achievement is not restricted to a certain type of learning environment.     

MATHEMATICS STUDENT TEACHERS’ RESPONSES TO INFLUENCES AND BELIEFS

This article forms part of an ongoing study of student teachers of secondary mathematics. The aspect reported on in this article is an analysis of the effects of the influences brought to bear upon four individual student teachers of secondary mathematics as they progress through a one-year postgraduate course of teacher training (PGCE) based at a British University. The students have differing initial beliefs about teaching, learning and mathematics. As anticipated in the literature, the student's initial beliefs survive virtually intact throughout the year. However, the study suggests that the link between initial beliefs and teaching approach is not deterministic. The study suggests ways of encouraging student teachers to employ a range of pupil activities in their teaching.     

An exploration of the role natural language and idiosyncratic representations in teaching how to convert among fractions, decimals, and percents

Using qualitative data collection and analyses techniques, we examined mathematical representations used by sixteen (N = 16) teachers while teaching the concepts of converting among fractions, decimals, and percents. We also studied representational choices by their students (N = 581).In addition to using geometric figures and manipulatives, teachers used natural language such as the words nanny and house to characterize mathematical procedures or algorithms. Some teachers used the words or phrases bigger, smaller, doubling, and building-up in the context of equivalent fractions. There was widespread use of idiosyncratic representations by teachers and students, specifically equations with missing equals signs and not multiply/dividing by one to find equivalent fractions. No evidence though of a relationship between representational forms and degree of correctness of solutions was found on student work. However, when students exhibited misconceptions, those misconceptions were linked to teachers’ use of idiosyncratic representations.     

Mathematics teaching development as a human practice: identifying and drawing the threads

The didactic triangle links mathematics, teachers and students in a consideration of teaching?Clearning interactions in mathematics classrooms. This paper focuses on teachers and teaching in the development of fruitful learning experiences for students with mathematics. It recognises primarily that teachers are humans with personal characteristics, subject to a range of influences through the communities of which they are a part, and considers aspects of teachers?? personhood, identity and agency in designing teaching for the benefit of their students. Teaching is seen as a developmental process in which inquiry plays a central role, both in doing mathematics in the classroom and in exploring teaching practice. The teacher-as-inquirer in collaboration with outsider researchers leads to growth of knowledge in teaching through development of identity and agency for both groups. The inclusion of the outsider researcher brings an additional node into the didactic triangle.     

Comparing Science Teaching Styles to Students' Perceptions of Scientists

Many educational researchers seem to concur with the idea that, among other factors, the teacher's teaching style has some impact on student learning and the perceptions students develop about science learning and the work of scientists. In this study, nine middle grades teachers' teaching styles were assessed using the Draw‐a‐Science‐Teacher‐Teaching Test Checklist (DASTT‐C) and categorized along a continuum from didactic to inquiry/constructivist in orientation. Students' (n = 339) perceptions of scientists were determined using the Draw‐a‐Scientist‐Test Checklist (DAST‐C). Teachers' teaching styles and their students' perceptions of scientists were then compared using nonparametric correlational methods. Results showed that no significant correlation existed between the two measures for the population studied. Although the study provides no understanding about when or how relationships developed between teachers' teaching styles and students' perceptions of scientists, trends in the results give rise to some concerns regarding the preparation of future science teachers and the in‐service development of practicing teachers.     

The Impact of Teacher Privileging on Learning Differentiation with Technology

This study examines how two teachers taught differentiation using a hand held computer algebra system, which made numerical,graphical and symbolic representations of the derivative readily available. The teachers planned the lessons together but taught their Year 11 classes in very different ways. They had fundamentally different conceptions of mathematics with associated teaching practices,innate ‘privileging’ of representations, and of technology use. This study links these instructional differences to the different differentiation competencies that the classes acquired. Students of the teacher who privileged conceptual understanding and student construction of meaning were more able to interpret derivatives. Students of the teacher who privileged performance of routines made better use of the CAS for solving routine problems. Comparison of the results with an earlier study showed that although each teacher's teaching approach was stable over two years, each used technology differently with further experience of CAS. The teacher who stressed understanding moved away from using CAS, whilst the teacher who stressed rules,adopted it more. The study highlights that within similar overall attainment on student tests, there can be substantial variations of what students know. New technologies provide more approaches to teaching and so greater variations between teaching and the consequent learning may become evident. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Student teachers’ types of probing questions in inquiry-based mathematics teaching with and without GeoGebra

Previous studies have produced several typologies of teacher questions in mathematics. Probing questions that ask students to explain are often included in the types of questions. However, only rare studies have created subtypes for probing questions or investigated how questioning differs depending on whether technology is used or not. The aims of this study are to elaborate on different ways of asking students to give explanations in inquiry-based mathematics teaching and to investigate whether questioning in GeoGebra lessons differs from questioning in other lessons. Data was collected by video recording 29 Finnish mathematics student teachers’ lessons in secondary and upper secondary schools. The lesson videos were coded for the student teachers’ probing questions. After this, categories for the types of probing questions were created, which is elaborated in this paper. It was found that the student teachers who used GeoGebra emphasized conceptual probing questions during the explore phase of a lesson slightly more than the other student teachers.     

Improving Science Teaching for All Students

An inservice program designed to enhance the knowledge and skills of elementary school teachers with respect to science content, effective teaching strategies, and gender equity was implemented as a semester-long course. During the course, teachers explored new science content in chemistry and physics and then collaboratively developed lesson plans from it based on hands-on, discovery-centered learning, enmeshed in strategies that could maximize female student interest and participation in science. Teachers tried out their lessons between course sessions in their own classrooms and then collaboratively reflected on their progress and problems in subsequent sessions. Program results were positive for both teachers and students. Teachers reported significant increases in both their level of knowledge of and their confidence in teaching chemistry and physics concepts, as well as in their knowledge of strategies for addressing gender inequities. Project students' attitudes, particularly those of the girls, improved for some dimensions, remained stable for others, and declined for one; the girls also increased their level of active participation in science activities. Overall, the project seems to have had a positive impact on science teaching content and pedagogy, and on student (especially girls') interest and active participation in science.     

Making practice studyable

A common way to situate professional learning in practice is to use representations of teaching, such as videos of classroom instruction or samples of student work. Using representations of teaching, however, does not automatically lead to teacher learning. Learning in and from practice also requires supports that make such practice studyable. The authors introduce and explore the work of “making practice studyable” by analyzing a case of practice-based professional development in which the professional development designers deliberately tried to mediate participants’ learning in and from practice. From this analysis, the authors identified five categories of work that can help make practice studyable: (1) engaging the content, (2) providing insight into student thinking, (3) orienting to the instructional context, (4) providing lenses for viewing, and (5) developing a disposition of inquiry. These categories are then applied to the use of a representation of mathematics teaching in a course for preservice elementary teachers.     

Collaborative Curriculum Investigation as a Vehicle for Teacher Enhancement and Mathematics Curriculum Reform

The Missouri Middle Mathematics (M³) Project is an NSF-funded 3-year professional development project involving teacher/administrator teams from districts statewide. Project activities focus on collaborative investigation of emerging reform-based middle school mathematics curricula to support individual and systemic reform. Collaborative review and field-testing of material facilitates awareness and exploration of alternative instructional and assessment strategies and informed decision making. Early indicators of the model's success are reflected in participants’ enthusiasm and professional growth. Project activities stimulate discussions of critical topics including questioning appropriateness of various teaching practices, research about teaching and learning, tracking policies, appropriate assessment models for gauging student learning and the importance of calculators and manipulatives as teaching and learning tools. These discussions transcend curriculum materials being reviewed and serve as a powerful vehicle for professional growth and development for individual teachers and districts.     

Teachers’ gestures and speech in mathematics lessons: forging common ground by resolving trouble spots

This research focused on how teachers establish and maintain shared understanding with students during classroom mathematics instruction. We studied the micro-level interventions that teachers implement spontaneously as a lesson unfolds, which we call micro-interventions. In particular, we focused on teachers’ micro-interventions around trouble spots, defined as points during the lesson when students display lack of understanding. We investigated how teachers use gestures along with speech in responding to such trouble spots in a corpus of six middle-school mathematics lessons. Trouble spots were a regular occurrence in the lessons (M = 10.2 per lesson). We hypothesized that, in the face of trouble spots, teachers might increase their use of gestures in an effort to re-establish shared understanding with students. Thus, we predicted that teachers would gesture more in turns immediately following trouble spots than in turns immediately preceding trouble spots. This hypothesis was supported with quantitative analyses of teachers’ gesture frequency and gesture rates, and with qualitative analyses of representative cases. Thus, teachers use gestures adaptively in micro-interventions in order to foster common ground when instructional communication breaks down.     

United States teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning

This study investigates US teachers’ cultural beliefs concerning effective mathematics teaching using semi-structured interviews with 11 experienced teachers. For US teachers, effective teaching is student-centered. Cognitively appropriate mathematical content should be understood through many hands-on activities that allow students to explore by themselves the relationship between mathematical knowledge and their life experiences. Correspondingly, the US teachers view an effective teacher as a facilitator who is sensitive to student social and cognitive needs and is skillful at organizing collaborative learning. The result of this study helps researchers and educators understand the student-centered learning model in US classrooms.     

运筹学课程教学中的探索与实践

结合教学实践经验,从提高学生的兴趣和积极性出发,在运筹学课程的教学过程中,提出了以学生为本,改进教学内容和教学方法,并把数学建模的思想融到运筹学课程的教学中去,从而提高学生的学习效果和教师的教学效果.     

Proof construction and in-process validation – Validation activities of undergraduates in constructing mathematical proofs

Proof construction and proof validation are two situations of high importance in mathematical teaching and research. While both situations have usually been studied separately, the current study focuses on possible intersections. Based on research on acceptance criteria and validation strategies, 11 undergraduates’ proof construction processes are investigated in terms of the effective and non-effective validation activities that occur. By conducting a qualitative content analysis with subsequent type construction, we identified six different validation activities, namely reviewing, rating, correcting errors, reassuring, expressing doubts, and improving. Although some of these activities tend to be associated with successful or unsuccessful proving processes, their effectiveness depends primarily on their specific implementation. For example, reviewing is effective when accompanied by a knowledge-generating approach and based on structure- or meaning-oriented criteria to provide deeper understanding. Thus, the results suggest that difficulties in proof construction could be partly attributed to inadequate validation strategies or their poor implementation.