Efficient Rhodium‐Catalyzed Multicomponent Reaction for the Synthesis of Novel Propargylamines

[{Rh(μ‐Cl)(H)₂(IPr)}₂] (IPr = 1,3‐bis‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazole‐2‐ylidene) was found to be an efficient catalyst for the synthesis of novel propargylamines by a one‐pot three‐component reaction between primary arylamines, aliphatic aldehydes, and triisopropylsilylacetylene. This methodology offers an efficient synthetic pathway for the preparation of secondary propargylamines derived from aliphatic aldehydes. The reactivity of [{Rh(μ‐Cl)(H)₂(IPr)}₂] with amines and aldehydes was studied, leading to the identification of complexes [RhCl(CO)IPr(MesNH₂)] (MesNH₂ = 2,4,6‐trimethylaniline) and [RhCl(CO)₂IPr]. The latter shows a very low catalytic activity while the former brought about reaction rates similar to those obtained with [{Rh(μ‐Cl)(H)₂(IPr)}₂]. Besides, complex [RhCl(CO)IPr(MesNH₂)] reacts with an excess of amine and aldehyde to give [RhCl(CO)IPr{MesN?CHCH₂CH(CH₃)₂}], which was postulated as the active species. A mechanism that clarifies the scarcely studied catalytic cycle of A₃‐coupling reactions is proposed based on reactivity studies and DFT calculations.     

Iridium Complexes of 2,2′‐Bidipyrrins

The reaction of [{Ir(cod)(μ‐Cl)}₂] and K₂CO₃ or of [{Ir(cod)(μ‐OMe)}₂] alone with the non‐natural tetrapyrrole 2,2′‐bidipyrrin (H₂BDP) yields, depending on the stoichiometry, the mononuclear complex [Ir(cod)(HBDP)] or the homodinuclear complex [{Ir(cod)}₂(BDP)]. Both complexes react readily with carbon monoxide to yield the species [Ir(CO)₂(HBDP)] and [{Ir(CO)₂}₂(BDP)], respectively. The results from NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction reveal different conformations for the tetrapyrrolic ligand in both complexes. The reaction of [{Ir(coe)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] with H₂BDP proceeds differently and yields the macrocyclic [4e^?,2H⁺]‐oxidized product [IrCl₂(9‐Meic)] (9‐Meic = monoanion of 9‐methyl‐9,10‐isocorrole), which can be addressed as an iridium analog of cobalamin.     

Conformational behaviour of dinuclear Rh(I) complexes of the open-chain tetrapyrrolic ligand 2,2′-bidipyrrin (H2BDP)

The reaction of 2,2′-bidipyrrins H₂BDP with the Rh^I complexes [Rh(COD)(μ-OMe)]₂ and [Rh(CO)₂(μ-Cl)]₂ yields the neutral species [{Rh(COD)}₂BDP] (7, 8) and [{Rh(CO)₂}₂BDP] (2, 9), respectively. Treatment of the COD complexes with carbon monoxide results in the exchange of all COD ligands against CO. Ligand exchange studies on the carbonyl complexes 2 and 9 with different phosphane donors reveal the regioselective exchange of one CO per metal ion. In most cases, the reaction is accompanied by a large conformational change of the tetrapyrrole from a syn to an anti conformation. This conformational change was resolved by a combination of NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction studies.     

A trinuclear cluster of osmium and molybdenum. Crystal structure of the co-crystallized molecules MoOs2(CO)11[P(OMe)3]2 and [(MeO)3P](OC)4OsMo(CO)5

The crystal structure of MoOs₂(CO)₁₁[P(OMe)₃]₂·[(MeO)₃P](OC)₄OsMo(CO)₅ is comprised of a slightly disordered, triangular cluster with a Mo(CO)₅ and two Os(CO)₃[P(OMe)₃] moieties (OsMo bond lengths are 3.041(2) and 3.079(2) Å) together with a [(MeO)₃P](OC)₄OsMo(CO)₅ molecule having a donor-acceptor OsMo bond of length 3.075(2) Å.     

Monocarbonyl cationic rhodium(I) complexes

Summary The preparations and characterisation of cationic complexes of the type [Rh(CO)(MeCN)(PR₃)₂]ClO₄, [Rh(CO)L(PR₃)₂]ClO₄ (L=py or 2-MeOpy), [Rh(CO)(L-L)(PR₃)₂]ClO₄ (L-L = bipy or phen) and [Rh(CO)(PR₃)₃]ClO₄ with PR₃ = P(p-YC₆H₄)₃ (Y=Cl, F, Me or MeO) are described.     

Di-2-pyridyl ketone in actinide chemistry: Dinuclear uranyl complexes

Treatment of UO₂X₂ (X = OAc, Cl, NO₃) with 1 mol equiv of (py)₂CO in THF afforded the adducts [UO₂X₂{(py)₂CO}] in almost quantitative yields. The same reactions in MeOH, in the presence of NEt₃ for X = Cl and NO₃, gave yellow crystals of [(UO₂X)₂{μ-(py)₂C(OMe)O}₂]·MeOH (X = OAc, 1·MeOH and X = Cl, 2·MeOH) and [{UO₂(NO₃)}₂{μ-(py)₂C(OMe)O}₂] (3). Reactions of UO₂X₂ (X = OAc, Cl) with 2 mol equiv of (py)₂CO and NEt₃ in MeOH or further treatment of 1 and 2 with 1 mol equiv of (py)₂CO and NEt₃ afforded the methoxide derivative [{UO₂(OMe)}₂{μ-(py)₂C(OMe)O}₂] (4), while UO₂(NO₃)₂ was transformed into [{UO₂(NO₃)}{UO₂(OH)}{μ-(py)₂C(OMe)O}₂] (5). In these first structurally characterized actinide compounds with a (py)₂CO-based ligand, the uranium atoms are located at the center of pentagonal (X = Cl and OMe) or hexagonal (X = OAc and NO₃) bipyramids sharing one edge defined by the μ-alkoxo oxygen atoms. Crystals of [{UO₂(OMe)}₂{μ-(py)₂C(OMe)O}₂]·[(UO₂)₄{μ₂-(py)₂C(OMe)O}₂(μ₂-OAc)₂(μ₃-O)₂(MeOH)₂]·H₂O (6·H₂O) were serendipitously obtained in one experiment with [UO₂(OAc)₂(H₂O)₂] and (py)₂CO.     

Direct Observation by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry of [Cp*RhMo3O8(OMe)5]−, a Key Intermediate in the Formation of the Double-Bookshelf-Type Oxide Cluster [(Cp*Rh)2Mo6O20(OMe)2]2−

The use of methanol as solvent is essential for the formation of the double-bookshelf-type oxide cluster [(Cp*Rh)₂Mo₆O₂₀(OMe)₂]²⁻ from [{Cp*Rh(μ-Cl)Cl}₂] and four equivalents of [Mo₂O₇]²⁻. The reaction proceeds via [Cp*RhMo₃O₈(OMe)₅]⁻. The proposed structure for this key intermediate (shown schematically) is supported by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and labeling experiments with CD₃OD as solvent. Cp*=η⁵-C₅Me₅.     

Terminal and Bridging Parent Amido 1,5‐Cyclooctadiene Complexes of Rhodium and Iridium

The ready availability of rare parent amido d⁸ complexes of the type [{M(μ‐NH₂)(cod)}₂] (M=Rh ( 1 ), Ir ( 2 ); cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene) through the direct use of gaseous ammonia has allowed the study of their reactivity. Both complexes 1 and 2 exchanged the di‐olefines by carbon monoxide to give the dinuclear tetracarbonyl derivatives [{M(μ‐NH₂)(CO)₂}₂] (M=Rh or Ir). The diiridium(I) complex 2 reacted with chloroalkanes such as CH₂Cl₂ or CHCl₃, giving the diiridium(II) products [(Cl)(cod)Ir(μ‐NH₂)₂Ir(cod)(R)] (R=CH₂Cl or CHCl₂) as a result of a two‐center oxidative addition and concomitant metal–metal bond formation. However, reaction with ClCH₂CH₂Cl afforded the symmetrical adduct [{Ir(μ‐NH₂)(Cl)(cod)}₂] upon release of ethylene. We found that the rhodium complex 1 exchanged the di‐olefines stepwise upon addition of selected phosphanes (PPh₃, PMePh₂, PMe₂Ph) without splitting of the amido bridges, allowing the detection of mixed COD/phosphane dinuclear complexes [(cod)Rh(μ‐NH₂)₂Rh(PR₃)₂], and finally the isolation of the respective tetraphosphanes [{Rh(μ‐NH₂)(PR₃)₂}₂]. On the other hand, the iridium complex 2 reacted with PMe₂Ph by splitting the amido bridges and leading to the very rare terminal amido complex [Ir(cod)(NH₂)(PMePh₂)₂]. This compound was found to be very reactive towards traces of water, giving the more stable terminal hydroxo complex [Ir(cod)(OH)(PMePh₂)₂]. The heterocyclic carbene IPr (IPr=1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene) also split the amido bridges in complexes 1 and 2 , allowing in the case of iridium to characterize in situ the terminal amido complex [Ir(cod)(IPr)(NH₂)]. However, when rhodium was involved, the known hydroxo complex [Rh(cod)(IPr)(OH)] was isolated as final product. On the other hand, we tested complexes 1 and 2 as catalysts in the transfer hydrogenation of acetophenone with iPrOH without the use of any base or in the presence of Cs₂CO₃, finding that the iridium complex 2 is more active than the rhodium analogue 1 .     

Electrogeneration of the molybdenum-molybdenum double bond from thiolate-bridged dinuclear precursors: carbon monoxide catalysed isomerisation about the MoMo bond

The irreversible electroreduction of any of the three distinct dimolybdenum thiolate complexes [{MoCp(CO)}₂(μ-SMe)₃]⁺ and [{MoCp(CO)X}₂(μ-SMe)₂] (Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅; X = Cl or Br) gives a common intermediate which we identify as cis-[{MoCp(CO)}₂(μ-SMe)₂] (I). This intermediate slowly isomerises to the isolable product trans-[{MoCp(CO)}₂(μ-SMe)₂]; the isomerisation is catalysed by carbon monoxide, a process which we suggest takes place through CO binding across and elimination from the molybdenum-molybdenum double bond of (I).     

Rhodium(I) complexes with bis(pyrazolyl)methane ligands. Crystal structure of [Rh(COD)(CH2(Pz)2)]ClO4·12 C2H4Cl2

The synthesis and properties of neutral and cationic complexes of general formulae [{RhCl(diolefin)}₂(CH₂(pz)₂)], [Rh(CO)₂ (CH₂(pz)₂)][RhCl₂(CO)₂], (Rh(diolefin)(CH₂(pz)₂)]ClO₂, [{Rh(diolefin)(PPh₃)}₂(CH₂(pz)₂)](ClO₄)₂, [Rh(CO)₂(CH₂(pz)₂)]ClO₄ and [Rh(CO)(CH₂(pz)₂)(PPh₃)]ClO₄ are described. The NMR spectra of [Rh(COD)(CH₂(pz)₂)]ClO₄ complexes are discussed. X-ray structural analysis of [Rh(COD)(CH₂(Pz)₂)]ClO₄ · $\text{1}\text{2}$C₂H₄Cl₂ is presented; the final R factor is 0.061 for 2436 observed data, recorded with Cu-K_α, not corrected for absorption and with the sample inside a capillary. The Rh atom presents a distorted square planar coordination in a mononuclear arrangement. The COD ring has a twisted boat conformation, and the two halves of the CH₂(Pz)₂ moiety, which are quite similar to one another, form an angle of 47.2(4)°.     

Carbonyl rhodium(I) complexes containing (H)PNX (X = O or N) ligands deriving from natural aminoacid–amides. Synthesis, X-ray structure and spectroscopic characterization

The polyfunctional (H)PNX (X = O or N) ligands 1 and 2 react with [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ to give the corresponding chloro carbonyl complexes {Rh[κ²-(H)PN](CO)Cl} (1a and 2a), where the neutral ligands coordinate in a κ²-PN bidentate fashion, the square planar coordination being completed by the CO trans to N and the chloride trans to P. In chloroform solution 1a maintains its original structure, while 2a partially transforms into the cationic species {Rh[κ³-(H)PNO](CO)}Cl. The chloroform solutions of 1a and 2a react with AgPF₆ to give the purely cationic species {Rh[κ³-(H)PNO](CO)}PF₆ ([1a]⁺ and [2a]⁺), while addition of Et₃N originates the neutral species {Rh[κ³-PNN′](CO)} (1b and 2b). All the complexes have been characterized by microanalysis, IR, ¹H NMR as well as ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy. The X-ray structures of ligand 1 and complex 1b are also reported.     

Rhodium(I) complexes with bidentate nitrogen heterocycles and their reactions with tin(II) chloride and carbon monoxide

Summary Cleavage of [{Rh(diolefin)Cl}₂] by bidentate heterocyclic chelating ligands (LL) has been studied, and diolefin neutral, ionic or ion-pair type compounds are formed depending on the ligands and/or the Rh: (LL) ratio employed. When the reactions are performed in media saturated with CO and with Rh: (LL)=21, only carbonylated ion-pair complexes are formed. The diolefin compounds react with tin(II) chloride yielding species containing trichlorostannato-groups. Subsequent reaction with CO leads to displacement of the diolefin and formation of the corresponding dicarbonyl species.     

Structural characterization of the anions [Rh6(CO)15X]− [X = COEt and CO(OMe)]

The anions [Rh₆(CO)₁₅X]^?, with X = COEt and CO(OMe), have been studied by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. They contain octahedral rhodium clusters, with mean metalmetal distances of 2.779 and 2.765 », respectively. The carbonyl stereochemistry in the two anions is similar to that of Rh₆(CO)₁₆, with one terminal CO group replaced by the X ligand. The RhC(carbomethoxy) bond distance (1.96(2) ») is significantly shorter than the RhC(acyl) distance (2.06(2) »).     

Übergangsmetall-substituierte phosphane,arsane und stibane : XXIX. Metallierte arsane und stibane mit chiralem eisen-substituenten

The reaction of Cp(CO)₂FeEMe₂ (E  As, Sb, Bi) with Me₃P, Et₃P, Me₂PhP and (MeO)₃P leads to a CO/R₃P exchange and formation of the chiral derivatives Cp(CO)(R₃P)FeEMe₂. Cp(CO)[(MeO)₃P]FeEMe₂ rearranges already at room temperature to Cp(CO)[(Me₃E]FeP(O)(OMe)₂ which is transformed by (MeO)₃P to Cp(CO)[(MeO)₃P]FeP(O)(OMe)₂. The high nucleophilicity of the new organometallic Lewis bases is established by the easy conversion of Cp(CO)(Me₃P)FeSbMe₂ to [Cp(CO)(Me₃P)Fe(SbMe₃)]I with MeI, or to [Cp(CO)(Me₃P)FeSbMe₂Fe(CO)LCp]Hal (L  CO, Hal  Cl; L  Me₃P, Hal  Br) with Cp(CO)LFe-Hal, respectively. The new compounds are characterized by spectroscopy and elementary analyses.     

Polymerization of propadiene. IV. Kinetics and mechanism of polymerization under the influence of rhodium(I) complexes

The kinetics and mechanisms of propadiene polymerization under the influence of [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂, Rh(CO)₂P(C₆H₅)₃Cl, Rh(CO)₃Cl are reported. The reaction rates are first-order in Rh(CO)₂P(C₆H₅)₃Cl and Rh(CO)₃Cl and half-order in [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂. They are second-order in the substrate for Rh(CO)₃Cl and [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ and first-order for Rh(CO)₂P(C₆H₅)₃Cl. The data are interpreted in terms of a common intermediate mechanism. The formation of this common intermediate is the rate-determining step. A solvent effect is also discussed.     

Controlling aggregation of copper(II)-based coordination compounds: From mononuclear to dinuclear, tetranuclear, and polymeric copper complexes

The use of a strategy combining ligand design and changes of reaction conditions has been investigated with the goal of directing the assembly of mononuclear, dinuclear, tetranuclear, and polymeric copper(II) complexes. As a result, closely related copper monomers, alkoxo dimers, and hydroxo cubanes, along with a carbonate-bridged polymeric species, have been synthesized using the rigid, aliphatic amino ligands cis-3,5-diamino-trans-hydroxycyclohexane (DAHC), cis-3,5-diamino-trans-methoxycyclohexane (DAMC), and the glutaryl-linked derivative glutaric acid bis-(cis-3,5-diaminocyclohexyl) ester (GADACE). The composition of the monomeric complex has been determined by X-ray crystallography as [Cu(DAHC)2](ClO4)2 (1), the two dimers as [{Cu(DAHC)(OMe)}2](ClO4)2.MeOH (2) and [{Cu(DAMC)(OMe)(ClO4)}2] (3), the three Cu4O4 cubanes as [{Cu(DAHC)(OH)}4](ClO4)(4).2.5MeOH (4), [{Cu(DAMC)(OH)}4](ClO4)4.H2O (5), and [{Cu2(OH)2(GADACE)}2]Cl4.2MeOH.6H2O (6), and an infinite-chain structure as [{Cu(DAHC)(CO3)}n] (7). Furthermore, the cubane structures 4 and 5 have been investigated magnetically. Our studies indicate that formation of the monomeric, dimeric, and tetranuclear DAHC and DAMC complexes can be controlled by small changes in reaction conditions and that further preorganization of the ligand moiety by linking the DAHC cores (GADACE) allows more effective direction of the self-assembly of the Cu4O4 cubane core.     

Halogen‐bridged Cationic Complexes of the Type [{CpM(CO)3}2X]SbF6 (M = Mo,W; X = Cl,I), [{CpW(CO)2Cl2}2Cl]SbCl6, and the Trichloride CpW(CO)2Cl3

The reaction of CpMo(CO)₃X (X = Cl, I) with SbF₅ in toluene leads to the cationic, halogen bridged compounds [{CpMo(CO)₃}₂X]SbF₆ ( 1 , 2 ). CpW(CO)₃Cl reacts with SbF₅ to yield [{CpW(CO)₃}₂Cl]SbF₆ ( 3 ), whereas with SbCl₅, the oxidative substitution product [{CpW(CO)₂Cl₂}₂Cl]SbCl₆ ( 4 ) is formed, which decomposes in solution to yield the trichloride CpW(CO)₂Cl₃ ( 5 ). The strong Lewis acid SbF₅ separates the halide from CpM(CO)₃X (M = Mo, W), and the resulting cationic fragment “CpM(CO)₃⁺” reacts with a further CpM(CO)₃X forming a halonium bridge ( 1 – 3 ). The exclusive formation of SbF₆^– can be explained by the oxidizing power of SbF₅. The IR, MS and NMR spectra of the compounds 1 – 5 as well as the X‐ray structure analysis of 5 are reported and discussed.     

First Stabilization of 14‐Electron Rhodium(I) Complexes by Hemichelation

Hemichelation is emerging as a new mode of coordination where non‐covalent interactions crucially contribute to the cohesion of electron‐unsaturated organometallic complexes. This study discloses an unprecedented demonstration of this concept to a Group 9 metal, that is, Rh^I. The syntheses of new 14‐electron Rh^I complexes were achieved by choosing the anti‐[(η⁶:η⁶‐fluorenyl){Cr(CO)₃}₂] anion as the ambiphilic hemichelating ligand, which was treated with [{Rh(nbd)Cl}₂] (nbd=norbornadiene) and [{Rh(CO)₂Cl}₂]. The new T‐shaped Rh^I hemichelates were characterized by analytical and structural methods. Investigations using the methods of the DFT and electron‐density topology analysis (NCI region analysis, QTAIM theory) confirmed the closed‐shell, non‐covalent and attractive characters of the interaction between the Rh^I center and the proximal Cr(CO)₃ moiety. This study shows that, by appropriate tuning of the electronic properties of the ambiphilic ligand, truly coordination‐unsaturated Rh^I complexes can be synthesized in a manageable form.     

Manganese(II) Complexes with Bridging Selenidoarsenate(III) Anions [AsSe2(Se2)]3− and [(AsSe2)2(μ‐Se2)]4−

Solvothermal reaction of [MnCl₂(terpy)] with elemental As and Se at a 1:1:2 molar ratio in H₂O/trien (10:1) at 150 °C affords the linear trimanganese(II) complex [{Mn(terpy)}₃(μ‐AsSe₄)₂] ( 1 ). The tridentate [AsSe₂(Se₂)]^3? anions of 1 chelate the terminal {Mn(terpy)}²⁺ fragments and bridge these through their remaining Se atom to the central {Mn(terpy)}²⁺ moiety. Weak interactions of Mn1···Se and Mn3···Se bonds with length 2.914(7) and 3.000(7) Å link the molecules of 1 into infinite chains. Treatment of [MnCl₂(cyclam)]Cl with As and Se at a 1:1:2 molar ratio in superheated H₂O/CH₃OH (1:1) at 150 °C yields the dinuclear complex [{Mn(cyclam)}₂ (μ‐As₂Se₆)] ( 2 ), whose novel [(AsSe₂)₂(μ‐Se₂)]^4? ligands bridge the Mn^II atoms in a μ‐1κ²Se¹, Se²: 2κ²Se⁵,Se⁶ manner.     

An investigation into the mechanism of conversion of fac-[Mn(CO)3{P(OMe)2Ph}2X] (X = Cl Br) into mer-cis-[MnCO2{P(OMe)2Ph}3X] in the presence of P(OMe)2Ph

The complex mer-trans-[Mn(CO)₃{P(OMe)₂Ph}₂X] (X = Cl, Br) is an intermediate in the conversion of fac-[Mn(CO)3{P(OMe)₂,Ph}₂,X] into mer- cis-[Mn(CO)₂{P(OMe)₂Ph}₃X] in the presence of P(OMe)₂Ph in benzene. No direct route between the latter two complexes could be detected kinetically. The results imply a trans carbonyl disposition as a prerequisite for higher carbonyl substitution in octahedral Mn¹ carbonyl complexes.