Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers

In some forward-masking conditions, signal thresholds may be elevated by the listener's inability to distinguish the signal from the preceding masker. In this study, such "confusion" effects are investigated for both sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers combined with sinusoidal signals of varying duration. Results for the sinusoidal maskers show effects of off-frequency listening for brief signals and possibly small effects of confusion for longer signals. Results for the narrow-band noise maskers show a marked influence of confusion over a wide range of signal durations. This range is in good agreement with that predicted from previous work with "pulsing" maskers [D. Neff, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1966-1976 (1985)]. These results suggest that studies using narrow-band noise forward maskers or studies of psychophysical suppression should include direct tests for confusion effects in key conditions.     

Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration

In this paper previous experiments on auditory filter shapes in binaural masking experiments [A. Kohlrausch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 573-583 (1988)] are extended to a wider range of masker and signal durations. The masker was a dichotic broadband noise with frequency-dependent interaural parameters. The interaural phase difference of the masker was 0 below 500 Hz and pi above 500 Hz. Signal frequency varied between 200 and 800 Hz, and the signal was presented either monaurally (Sm) or binaurally in antiphase (S pi). In the first experiment, the masker duration was fixed at 500 ms and signals of 250 and 20 ms were used. In the second experiment, the signal duration was fixed at 20 ms, and the masker duration was reduced to 25 ms. The results from both experiments are consistent with studies using No or N pi maskers: The binaural masking level difference (BMLD) increases slightly for shorter test signals and decreases strongly for short maskers. The BMLD patterns of the first experiment are well described by the auditory-filter model derived for stationary test signals, if the additional influence of "off-frequency listening" for the short test signal is taken into account. The BMLDs resulting from the second experiment (25-ms masker), however, are much lower than predicted by this filter model This outcome supports previous observations that binaural unmasking becomes less effective for very short masker durations and indicates that this effect is even stronger for maskers with a complex structure of interaural parameters.     

Additivity of simultaneous masking, revisited

Lutfi [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 262-267 (1983)] compared simultaneous masking functions (signal threshold versus masker level) for individual sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers, and for those maskers presented in pairs. Lutfi found that the pairs of maskers produced 10-17 dB "excess" masking over that predicted from the linear sum of their individual masking and explained the results in terms of a model in which the effects of the maskers are summed after undergoing independent compressive transformations. This paper describes experiments similar to those of Lutfi, and presents evidence suggesting that Lutfi's results may have been influenced by two factors: (1) combination-product detection, and (2) the use of different detection cues for single maskers and for pairs of maskers. Experiment I showed that when the stimulus conditions were chosen so as to minimize the likelihood of combination-product detection, "excess" masking was only 3-5 dB. Experiment II supported the idea that for a single narrow-band noise masker, subjects make use of the relatively slow envelope fluctuations to enhance performance. When two independent narrow-band noise maskers are added, the effectiveness of this cue is reduced, and between 3 and 9 dB of "excess" masking occurs. When the two noises are derived from the same source, and have correlated envelope fluctuations, no "excess" masking occurs. The results indicate that Lufti's compressive-nonlinearity model clearly fails in some situations.     

Children's detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers.

Preschoolers and adults were asked to detect a 1000-Hz signal, which was masked by a multitone complex. The frequencies and amplitudes of the components in the complex varied randomly and independently on each presentation. A staircase, cued two-interval, forced-choice procedure disguised as a "listening game" was used to obtain signal thresholds in quiet and in the presence of the multitone maskers. The number of components in the masker was fixed within an experimental condition and varied from 2 to 906 across experimental conditions. Thresholds were also measured with a broadband noise masker. Eight preschool children and eight adults were tested. Although individual differences were large, among both adults and children, there was little difference between the groups in the mean amount of masking produced by the maskers with large numbers of components (400 and 906). There was also a small but significant difference between adults and children in the mean amount of masking produced by the broadband noise. The difference between the groups was much larger with smaller numbers of components. Data obtained from the adults were basically similar to that previously reported [cf. Neff and Green, Percept. Psychophys. 41, 409-415 (1987); Oh and Lutfi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3489-3499 (1998)]: maskers comprised of 10-40 components produced as much as 30 to 60 dB of masking in some, but not all listeners. Those same maskers produced larger amounts of masking (70-83 dB) in many of the preschool children, although, as in the adult group, individual differences were large. The component-relative-entropy (CoRE) model [Lutfi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 748-758 (1993)] was used to describe the differences in performance between the children and adults. According to this model the average child appears to integrate information over a larger number of auditory filters than the average adult.     

Effects of changes in absolute signal level on psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and noise in patas monkeys

Forward masking psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were measured in patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) at 2, 4, and 8 kHz at signal levels of 10, 30, and 60 dB SL in quiet, and at 10 dB above masked threshold in two levels of wideband noise. Absolute signal levels with masking approximated those at 30 and 60 dB SL in quiet. Results in quiet agree with those reported in the literature, demonstrating broadening of the PTC as signal level is increased. The PTCs measured in noise also demonstrated a similar broadening, or loss of selectivity, at higher SPLs. These later findings differ from those of a previous study [D.M. Green, B.R. Shelton, M.C. Picardi, and E.R. Hafter, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 1758-1762 (1981)] which used maskers to control the broadened excitation pattern in humans at levels of up to 34 dB above threshold. Differences in findings might be attributed to higher SPLs used in the present study. The data taken in noise backgrounds are not consistent with explanations for broadening based on an increase in the width of excitation patterns, but instead support the suggestion that the filter itself is nonlinear. Moreover, comparisons of PTCs in quiet and noise suggest that "off-frequency" listening acts at any given measurement level to artificially sharpen PTCs.     

Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations

This paper examines how short-term energy fluctuations in a masker affect the thresholds for tones at frequencies above those of the masker. Two equally intense tones at 1060 and 1075 Hz produce up to 25 dB less masking than does a 1075-Hz tone set to the overall level of the two-tone complex. At wider frequency separations, two-tone complexes also produce less masking than the pure tone. These results indicate that envelope fluctuations in a masker, whose spectrum is confined to a single critical band, may result in release from masking. The release from masking probably is related to the comodulation masking release reported by Hall et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 50-56 (1984b)] for modulated-noise maskers with bandwidths greater than one critical band. Further measurements with maskers, whose intensity level in the critical band around 1 kHz was 90 dB SPL, show similar masking by a pure tone and a 625- to 1075-Hz bandpass noise, but less masking by narrow-band noises. These results are inconsistent with a simple frequency selective energy-detector model and indicate that the auditory system can use periods of low masker energy as brief as a few ms to enhance detection of a tone. The results also imply that the upward spread of excitation is best represented by masking patterns for noises with bandwidths of several critical bands.     

Effect of masker harmonicity on informational masking

Detection thresholds for a tone in an unfamiliar tonal pattern can be greatly elevated under conditions of masker uncertainty [Neff and Green, Percept. Psychophys. 41, 409-415 (1987); Oh and Lutfi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3148 (1997)]. The present experiment was undertaken to determine whether harmonicity of masker tones can reduce the detrimental effect of masker uncertainty. Inharmonic maskers were comprised of m=2-49 frequency components selected at random on each presentation within 100-10000 Hz, excluding frequencies between 920-1080. Harmonic maskers were comprised of frequency components selected at random within this same range, but constrained to have a fundamental frequency of 200 Hz. For inharmonic maskers the signal was a 1000-Hz tone. For harmonic-maskers the signal was a tone whose frequency was either harmonically (1000 Hz) or inharmonically (1047 Hz) related to the masker. In all conditions the amount of masking was greatest for m = 20-40 components. At this point, harmonic maskers with harmonic signal produced an average of 9-12 dB less masking than inharmonic maskers. Harmonic maskers with inharmonic signal produced an average of 16-20 dB less masking.     

Informational masking caused by contralateral stimulation

Although informational masking is thought to reflect central mechanisms, the effects are generally much stronger when the target and masker are presented to the same ear than when they are presented to different ears. However, the results of a recent study by Brungart and Simpson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2985-2995 (2002)] indicated that a speech masker that is presented contralateral to a speech signal can produce substantial amounts of informational masking when a second speech masker is played simultaneously in the same ear as the signal. In this study, we conducted a series of experiments that paralleled those of Brungart and Simpson but used a pure-tone signal and multitone informational maskers in a detection task. Both the signal and the maskers were played as sequences of short bursts in each observation interval. The maskers were arranged in two types of spectrotemporal patterns. One type of pattern, called "multiple-bursts same" (MBS), has previously been shown to produce very large amounts of informational masking while the other type of pattern, called "multiple-bursts different" (MBD), has been shown to produce very small amounts of informational masking. Several conditions of ipsilateral, contralateral, and combined presentation of these maskers were tested. The results showed that presentation of the MBS masker in the contralateral ear produced a substantial amount of informational masking when the MBD masker was simultaneously presented to the ipsilateral ear. The results supported the earlier findings of Brungart and Simpson indicating that listeners are unable to selectively focus their attention on a single ear in some complex dichotic listening conditions. These results suggest that this contralateral masking effect is not restricted to speech and may reflect more general limitations on processing capacity. Further, it was concluded that the magnitude of the contralateral masking effect was related both to the informational masking value of the contralateral masker and the complexity of the stimulus and/or task in the ear in which the signal was presented.     

On the role of envelope fluctuation processing in spectral masking

This study examines the role of temporal cues in spectral masking, such as beats and intrinsic envelope fluctuations. Predictions from the modulation-filterbank model developed by Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2906-2919 (1997)] are compared to average masking patterns from Moore et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 1023-1038 (1998)]. In these experiments, tones and narrow-band noises have been used as the signal and the masker, so that all four signal-masker combinations are considered. In addition, model predictions are compared with new experimental data in conditions of notched-noise masking, where the masker consisted of two narrow-band noises whose bandwidth and frequency separation were varied systematically. The model uses a peripheral filtering stage with linear and symmetric Gammatone filters, an adaptation stage that includes a static compressive nonlinearity for stationary input stumuli and a higher sensitivity for envelope fluctuation, and a modulation filterbank that analyzes the output for each peripheral channel. For low and medium masker levels, the model accounts very well for the masking patterns in all signal-masker conditions, as well as for the notched-noise conditions. In contrast, predictions from a version of the model that acts like an energy detector account for only some of the notched-noise data, and generally do not account for the shape of the masking patterns. For a high masker level, the simulations suggest the use of asymmetric filters, with a steeper high-frequency slope than is used in the linear model, consistent with results from previous studies. In addition, several nonlinear effects become apparent at this masker level, which cannot be accounted for by the current model.     

Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming

To examine whether auditory streaming contributes to unmasking, intelligibility of target sentences against two competing talkers was measured using the coordinate response measure (CRM) [Bolia et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1065-1066 (2007)] corpus. In the control condition, the speech reception threshold (50% correct) was measured when the target and two maskers were collocated straight ahead. Separating maskers from the target by +/-30 degrees resulted in spatial release from masking of 12 dB. CRM sentences involve an identifier in the first part and two target words in the second part. In experimental conditions, masking talkers started spatially separated at +/-30 degrees but became collocated with the target before the scoring words. In one experiment, one target and two different maskers were randomly selected from a mixed-sex corpus. Significant unmasking of 4 dB remained despite the absence of persistent location cues. When same-sex talkers were used as maskers and target, unmasking was reduced. These data suggest that initial separation may permit confident identification and streaming of the target and masker speech where significant differences between target and masker voice characteristics exist, but where target and masker characteristics are similar, listeners must rely more heavily on continuing spatial cues.     

Relationship between psychophysical tuning curves and "suppression"

This study examined two-tone unmasking and auditory frequency selectivity about 3 kHz for the purpose of demonstrating a qualitative relationship between the two. An adaptive 2IFC forward-masking procedure was used to collect psychophysical tuning curves (PTC's) and two-tone masking data under a quiet and noise condition for the same normal-hearing listeners. In the noise condition, a narrowband noise masker, centered one decade down from the probe, was gated on with the tonal masker(s). Kiang and Moxon [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 620-630 (1974)] have found that low-frequency narrowband noise serves to decrease the sharpness of electrophysiological tuning curves by affecting only the tip segments. The data for four highly practiced listeners indicate that the gated-noise masker was effective in broadening the PTC's and in lessening the magnitude of two-tone unmasking. The mutually reflected changes in tuning curves and in two-tone unmasking indicate a close relationship between frequency selectivity and unmasking: the greater the magnitude of unmasking above the center frequency of the PTC, the sharper the tuning of the PTC.     

Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release

These experiments on across-channel masking (ACM) and comodulation masking release (CMR) were designed to extend the work of Grose and Hall [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1276-1284 (1989)] on CMR. They investigated the effect of the temporal position of a brief 700-Hz signal relative to the modulation cycle of a 700-Hz masker 100% sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) at a 10-Hz rate, which was either presented alone (reference masker) or formed part of a masker consisting of the 3rd to 11th harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental. In the harmonic maskers, each harmonic was either SAM with the same 10-Hz modulator phase (comodulated masker) or with a shift in modulator phase of 90 degrees for each successive harmonic (phase-incoherent masker). When the signal was presented at the dips of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, the comodulated masker gave lower thresholds than the reference masker, while the phase-incoherent masker gave higher thresholds, i.e., a CMR was observed. No CMR was found when the signal was presented at the peaks of the envelope. In experiment 1, we replicated the experiment of Grose and Hall, but with an additional condition in which the 600- and 800-Hz components were removed from the masker, in order to investigate the role of within-channel masking effects. The results were similar to those of Grose and Hall. In experiment 2, the signal was added at the peaks of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, but in antiphase to the carrier of that component and at a level chosen to transform the peaks into dips. No CMR was found. Rather, performance was worse for both the comodulated and phase-incoherent maskers than for the reference masker. This was true even when the flanking components in the maskers were all remote in frequency from 700 Hz. In experiment 3, the masker components were all 50% SAM and the signal was added in antiphase at a dip of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, thus making the dip deeper. Performance was worse for the phase-incoherent than for the reference masker and was worse still for the comodulated masker. The results of all three experiments indicate strong ACM effects. CMR was found only when the signal was placed in the dips of the masker envelope and when it produced an increase in level relative to that in adjacent bands.     

Intermodulation distortion in the cochlea as shown by offset action potential (AP) masking curves

In their recent article "Offset AP masker tuning curve and the FFT of the stimulus" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 1354-1362 (1988)], Henry and Lewis demonstrated that the tuning curve obtained by the simultaneous masking of the whole nerve action potential (AP) could have two tips when the AP is generated at the offset of the envelope of a high-level probe. The primary tip falls below the probe frequency, whereas the secondary tip falls above the probe frequency. Curves obtained for the onset response with either forward or simultaneous masking did not show the secondary peak, nor did curves obtained for the offset response with forward masking. Henry and Lewis discussed various reasons for the secondary tip, but came to no conclusion as to the underlying mechanisms. Here, it is reasoned that the secondary tip of the offset curve can be simply explained by the generation within the cochlea of intermodulation distortion (IMD), which acts as a forward masker to the offset response. The IMD is dominated by the cubic component (2f1-f2) and arises from the interaction of the probe tone and the simultaneous masker. Finally, it is reasoned that the lower sideband of the frequency splatter present at probe offset is the primary stimulus for the evoked neural response under probe offset conditions. Thus the offset curve will always have a primary tip that is lower in frequency than that of the respective onset curve. These hypotheses are supported by single-fiber data.     

Monaural masking release in random-phase and low-noise noise

Two masking-release paradigms thought to involve across-channel processing are comodulation masking release (CMR) and profile analysis. Similarities between these two paradigms were explored by comparing signal detection in maskers that varied only in degree of envelope fluctuation. The narrow-band-noise maskers were 10 Hz wide and their envelope fluctuations were manipulated using the low-noise noise algorithm of Pumplin [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 100-104 (1985)]. Masking conditions included the classic CMR conditions of an on-frequency band, multiple (five) incoherent bands, or multiple coherent bands. Detection was compared using both random-phase noise (RPN) and low-noise noise (LNN) maskers. In one set of conditions, the signal was identical to the on-frequency masker, yielding an intensity discrimination task. Conditions that included RPN maskers and tonal signals resembled the classic CMR paradigm, whereas conditions including LNN and noise signals more closely resembled the classic profile analysis paradigm. Other conditions may be considered hybrids. This combination of conditions provided a wide variety of within- and across-channel cues for detection. The results suggest that CMR and profile analysis could be based upon the same set of stimulus cues and perhaps the same perceptual processes.     

Binaural effects in center-frequency modulation detection interference for vowel formants

The detection of slow (5 Hz) center-frequency modulations of formants (signals) can be impaired by the simultaneous presentation of off-frequency modulated formants (maskers) to the same ear [J. Lyzenga and R. P. Carlyon, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2792-2806 (1999)]. In the present study we examine this "formant-frequency modulation detection interference (FMDI)" for various binaural masker presentation schemes. Signals and maskers were formantlike complex tones, centered around 1500 and 3000 Hz, respectively. Fundamentals of 80 and 240 Hz were used. The signals were presented to the right ear. The maskers were presented either to the right, the left, or to both ears, and they were either unmodulated or modulated at a slow rate (10 Hz). They had the same fundamental as the signals. Hardly any interference was found for the unmodulated maskers. For modulated maskers, the amount of FMDI depended strongly on the binaural masker presentation scheme. Substantial interference was found for the ipsilateral maskers. Interference was smaller for the contralateral maskers. In both cases the FMDI increased with increasing masker level. Substantial interference was also found for the binaural maskers. Imposing different interaural time and level differences (ITDs and ILDs) on maskers and signals did not affect FMDI. The same was true for the ITD condition when the maskers had different fundamentals than the signals, though FMDI was slightly smaller here. The amount of interference for the binaural maskers was roughly equal to that of the corresponding monaural masker with the largest effect. The data could not be described accurately using a model based on the loudness of the maskers. On the other hand, they were well described by a model in which the amount of FMDI was predicted from a "weighted combination" of the monaural masker levels.     

Informational masking with small set sizes

Informational masking refers to interference in the detectability of a sound, or discrimination of some property of a sound, beyond that which can be attributed to interactions at the auditory periphery. In the current experiments the signal to be detected was a tone added to a 6-tone masker, and informational masking was introduced by randomly choosing the frequencies of the tones that comprise the masker. The primary question was whether small numbers of maskers could replace randomly drawn maskers without sacrificing the underlying detection schemes adopted by observers. Similar to the method used by Wright and Saberi [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1765-1775 (1999)], detection thresholds were measured for different masker set sizes, where set size refers to the number of 6-tone maskers from which any one masker was drawn. Set sizes of 3, 6, 12, and 24 were tested as well as conditions in which the maskers were chosen at random. In addition, observers' memory for maskers was coarsely evaluated. Large differences in thresholds were found across observers and across different masker sets. Even for set sizes of 24, the memory test suggests some recognition of maskers for some observers. Post hoc analysis of the data included an evaluation of the relative contribution of different frequencies using a single linear model. As a base for comparison, a linear model fitted to each condition was also evaluated. Although the data were fitted better using many rather than one linear model, the reduction in quality of fit was modest. This result suggests substantial consistency in decision strategies regardless of masker set size.     

Physiological responses to the pulsation threshold paradigm. II: Representations of high-pass noise in average rate measures of auditory-nerve fiber discharge

In a companion article [L. I. Hellstrom, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 230-242 (1989)], it was shown that psychophysical pulsation threshold masking patterns (PTPs) for high-pass noise maskers are not a simple transformation of the profile of activity evoked in the auditory nerve by the masker. In this article, PTPs are compared with neural representations in which interactions of masker and probe are considered. It is hypothesized that, at pulsation threshold, some criterion value of rate change occurs when the stimulus switches from masker to probe. The iso-rate probe level, defined for single auditory-nerve fibers, is the probe level at which this rate change is zero. Iso-rate probe levels are lowest when probe frequency equals best frequency (BF) of the fiber. Profiles of iso-rate probe level versus BF (equal to probe frequency) are qualitatively similar to PTPs but differ quantitatively, e.g., in the rate of growth of probe level with masker level (1.2 dB/dB for PTPs, 0.54 dB/dB for iso-rate profiles). Quantitative differences can be further reduced by requiring a positive rate criterion. These results suggest that PTPs are not solely a reflection of the internal representation of the masker, but reflect responses to the probe tone as well.     

Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech

Stone et al. [J. Acoust. Soc Am. 130, 2874-2881 (2011)], using vocoder processing, showed that the envelope modulations of a notionally steady noise were more effective than the envelope energy as a masker of speech. Here the same effect is demonstrated using non-vocoded signals. Speech was filtered into 28 channels. A masker centered on each channel was added to the channel signal at a target-to-background ratio of -5 or -10 dB. Maskers were sinusoids or noise bands with bandwidth 1/3 or 1 ERB(N) (ERB(N) being the bandwidth of "normal" auditory filters), synthesized with Gaussian (GN) or low-noise (LNN) statistics. To minimize peripheral interactions between maskers, odd-numbered channels were presented to one ear and even to the other. Speech intelligibility was assessed in the presence of each "steady" masker and that masker 100% sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) at 8 Hz. Intelligibility decreased with increasing envelope fluctuation of the maskers. Masking release, the difference in intelligibility between the SAM and its "steady" counterpart, increased with bandwidth from near-zero to around 50 percentage points for the 1-ERB(N) GN. It is concluded that the sinusoidal and GN maskers behaved primarily as energetic and modulation maskers, respectively.     

Forward masking with equal-energy maskers

Temporal masking of chicks by noise was investigated using a forward-masking paradigm. The temporal separation delta T between the click and the noise ranged from 0.03 to 100 msec. The duration of the noise varied from 3 to 500 msec while its energy remained fixed. For fixed delta T (delta T greater than 3 msec), the masking effect may actually increase for the longer, less intense noises despite the fact that, for long maskers, there is less masker energy near the signal in time. These results are interpreted in terms of the modified version of the running-average hypothesis [M. J. Penner, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 195--201 (1978)] in which it is argued that the auditory system compresses the intensity of the stimulus prior to integrating it. If the temporal integrator depends on stimulus intensity, then these results may be easily predicted. As an alternative explanation we show that compression may reduce the effective intensity of short maskers to such an extent that they do less masking than the longer ones. Such reduction in masking effectiveness will occur if the time between the masker and the signal is long enough so that the effects of compression and integrator shape do not counterbalance each other.