Regiospecific Formation and Unusual Optical Properties of 2,5‐Bis(arylethynyl)rhodacyclopentadienes: A New Class of Luminescent Organometallics

A series of 2,5‐bis(arylethynyl)rhodacyclopentadienes has been prepared by a rare example of regiospecific reductive coupling of 1,4‐(p‐R‐phenyl)‐1,3‐butadiynes (R?H, Me, OMe, SMe, NMe₂, CF₃, CO₂Me, CN, NO₂, ?C?C‐(p‐C₆H₄?NHex₂), ?C?C?(p‐C₆H₄?CO₂Oct)) at [RhX(PMe₃)₄] ( 1 ) (X=?C?C?SiMe₃ ( a ), ?C?C‐(p‐C₆H₄?NMe₂) ( b ), ?C?C?C?C?(p‐C₆H₄?NPh₂) ( c ) or ?C?C?{p‐C₆H₄‐C?C?(p‐C₆H₄‐N(C₆H₁₃)₂)} ( d ) or Me ( e )), giving the 2,5‐bis(arylethynyl) isomer exclusively. The rhodacyclopentadienes bearing a methyl ligand in the equatorial plane (compound 1 e ) have been converted into their chloro analogues by reaction with HCl etherate. The rhodacycles thus obtained are stable to air and moisture in the solid state and the acceptor‐substituted compounds are even stable to air and moisture in solution. The photophysical properties of the rhodacyclopentadienes are highly unusual in that they exhibit, exclusively, fluorescence between 500–800 nm from the S₁ state, with quantum yields of Φ=0.01–0.18 and short lifetimes (τ=0.45–8.20 ns). The triplet state formation (Φ_ISC=0.57 for 2 a ) is exceptionally slow, occurring on the nanosecond timescale. This is unexpected, because the Rh atom should normally facilitate intersystem crossing within femto‐ to picoseconds, leading to phosphorescence from the T₁ state. This work therefore highlights that in some transition‐metal complexes, the heavy atom can play a more subtle role in controlling the photophysical behavior than is commonly appreciated.     

Enantiomerically Pure Phosphaalkene–Oxazolines (PhAk‐Ox): Synthesis,Scope and Copolymerization with Styrene

The design of a synthetic route to a class of enantiomerically pure phosphaalkene–oxazolines (PhAk‐Ox) is presented. The condensation of a lithium silylphosphide and a ketone (the phospha‐Peterson reaction) was used as the P?C bond‐forming step. Attempted condensation of PhC(?O)Ox (Ox=CNOCH(iPr)C H₂) and MesP(SiMe₃)Li gave the unusual heterocycle (MesP)₂C(Ph)?CN‐(S)‐CH(iPr)CH₂O ( 3 ). However, PhAk‐Ox (S,E)‐MesP?C(Ph)CMe₂Ox ( 1 a ) was successfully prepared by treating MesP(SiMe₃)Li with PhC(?O)CMe₂Ox (52 %). To demonstrate the modularity and tunability of the phospha‐Peterson synthesis several other phosphaalkene–oxazolines were prepared in an analogous manner to 1 a : TripP?C(Ph)CMe₂Ox ( 1 b ; Trip=2,4,6‐triisopropylphenyl), 2‐iPrC₆H₄P?C(Ph)CMe₂Ox ( 1 c ), 2‐tBuC₆H₄P?C(Ph)CMe₂Ox ( 1 d ), MesP?C(4‐MeOC₆H₄)CMe₂Ox ( 1 e ), MesP?C(Ph)C(CH₂)₄Ox ( 1 f ), and MesP?C(3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃)C(CH₂)₄Ox ( 1 g ). To evaluate the PhAk‐Ox compounds as prospective precursors to chiral phosphine polymers, monomer 1 a and styrene were subjected to radical‐initiated copolymerization conditions to afford [{MesPC(Ph)(CMe₂Ox)}_x{CH₂CHPh}_y]_n ( 9 a : x=0.13n, y=0.87n; GPC: M_w=7400 g mol^?1, PDI=1.15).     

Acid-catalyzed polycondensation of bisdiazoalkanes

Dimerization reactions of diphenyldiazomethane have been applied to the polycondensation of six bisdiazobenzyl arylenes, namely 1,4- and 1,3-bis(α-diazobenzyl)-benzenes C₆H₅CN₂? (C₆H₄)? CN₂C₆H₅; 1,4- and 1,3-bis(α-diazo-p-methoxybenzyl)-benzenes, p,p′-MeO? C₆H₄? CN₂? (C₆H₄)? CN₂C₆H₄? OMe; 4,4′-bis(α-diazobenzyl)-diphenylmethane, C₆H₅CN₂? (C₆H₄CH₂C₆H₄)? CN₂C₆H₅; and 4,4′-bis(α-diazobenyl)-diphenyl ether, C₆H₅CN₂? (C₆H₄? O? C₆H₄)CN₂C₆H₅. Depending on the nature of the catalysts, polyene-arylenes (? C(Ar)?C(Ar)? C₆H₄)_n, and polyazine-arylenes, (? C(Ar)?N? N? C(Ar)? C₆H₄? )_n, can be obtained selectively by acid-catalyzed decomposition of these bisdiazoalkanes at room temperature. With perchloric acid and with arylsulfonic acids in strong polar media, polyene-arylenes are formed. On the other hand, boron trifluoride and arylsulfonic acids in solvents of low dielectric constant afford polyazine-arylenes. Less selective is the thermal decomposition at 75°C in toluene solution; it gives a polymer containing about 90% azine and 10% olefinic groups. All these polymers are soluble in common solvents. Their molecular weight vary from 3 200 to 5 000, i.e., X?_n from 12 to 20. The polyene-arylenes are very stable and decompose only around 500°C; the polyazine-arylenes are less stable and decompose around 370°C by losing nitrogen.     

Interaction of the Benzenium Ion with Inert Ligands: IR Spectra of C6H7+?Ln Cluster Cations (L=Ar,N2, CH4, H2O)

IR photodissociation spectra of mass‐selected clusters composed of protonated benzene (C₆H₇⁺) and several ligands L are analyzed in the range of the C? H stretch fundamentals. The investigated systems include C₆H₇⁺? Ar, C₆H₇⁺? (N₂)_n (n=1–4), C₆H₇⁺? (CH₄)_n (n=1–4), and C₆H₇⁺? H₂O. The complexes are produced in a supersonic plasma expansion using chemical ionization. The IR spectra display absorptions near 2800 and 3100 cm^?1, which are attributed to the aliphatic and aromatic C? H stretch vibrations, respectively, of the benzenium ion, that is, the σ complex of C₆H₇⁺. The C₆H₇⁺? (CH₄)_n clusters show additional C? H stretch bands of the CH₄ ligands. Both the frequencies and the relative intensities of the C₆H₇⁺ absorptions are nearly independent of the choice and number of ligands, suggesting that the benzenium ion in the detected C₆H₇⁺? L_n clusters is only weakly perturbed by the microsolvation process. Analysis of photofragmentation branching ratios yield estimated ligand binding energies of the order of 800 and 950 cm^?1 (≈9.5 and 11.5 kJ mol^?1) for N₂ and CH₄, respectively. The interpretation of the experimental data is supported by ab initio calculations for C₆H₇⁺? Ar and C₆H₇⁺? N₂ at the MP 2/6‐311 G(2df,2pd) level. Both the calculations and the spectra are consistent with weak intermolecular π bonds of Ar and N₂ to the C₆H₇⁺ ring. The astrophysical implications of the deduced IR spectrum of C₆H₇⁺ are briefly discussed.     

Ligand‐to‐Ligand Charge‐Transfer Transitions of Platinum(II) Complexes with Arylacetylide Ligands with Different Chain Lengths: Spectroscopic Characterization,Effect of Molecular Conformations,and Density Functional Theory Calculations

The complexes [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1R}]⁺ (n=1: R=alkyl and aryl (Ar); n=1–3: R=phenyl (Ph) or Ph‐N(CH₃)₂‐4; n=1 and 2, R=Ph‐NH₂‐4; tBu₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) and [Pt(Cl₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=tert‐butyl (tBu), Ph, 9,9’‐dibutylfluorene, 9,9’‐dibutyl‐7‐dimethyl‐amine‐fluorene; Cl₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐trichloro‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) were prepared. The effects of substituent(s) on the terpyridine (tpy) and acetylide ligands and chain length of arylacetylide ligands on the absorption and emission spectra were examined. Resonance Raman (RR) spectra of [Pt(tBu₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=n‐butyl, Ph, and C₆H₄‐OCH₃‐4) obtained in acetonitrile at 298 K reveal that the structural distortion of the C?C bond in the electronic excited state obtained by 502.9 nm excitation is substantially larger than that obtained by 416 nm excitation. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations on [Pt(H₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R= n‐propyl (nPr), 2‐pyridyl (Py)), [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1Ph}]⁺ (n=1–3), and [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺/+H⁺ (n=1–3; H₃tpy=nonsubstituted terpyridine) at two different conformations were performed, namely, with the phenyl rings of the arylacetylide ligands coplanar (“cop”) with and perpendicular (“per”) to the H₃tpy ligand. Combining the experimental data and calculated results, the two lowest energy absorption peak maxima, λ₁ and λ₂, of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl, R=aryl) are attributed to ¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] in the “cop” conformation and mixed ¹[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] transitions in the “per” conformation. The lowest energy absorption peak λ₁ for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐H‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3) shows a redshift with increasing chain length. However, for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C6H4C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3), λ₁ shows a blueshift with increasing chain length n, but shows a redshift after the addition of acid. The emissions of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl) at 524–642 nm measured in dichloromethane at 298 K are assigned to the ³[π(C?CAr)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states and mixed ³[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/³[π(C?C)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states for R=aryl and alkyl groups, respectively. [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1 and 2) are nonemissive, and this is attributed to the small energy gap between the singlet ground state (S₀) and the lowest triplet excited state (T₁).     

A Germylene/Borane Lewis Pair and the Remarkable C=O Bond Cleavage Reaction toward Isocyanate and Ketone Molecules

A germylene/borane Lewis pair ( 2 ) was prepared from a 1,1‐carboboration of amidinato phenylethynylgermylene ( 1 ) by B(C₆F₅)₃. Compound 2 reacted with iPrNCO and (4‐MeOC₆H₄)C(O)Me, respectively, with cleavage of the C=O double bond. In the first instance, O and iPrNC insert separately into the Ge?B bond to yield a GeBC₂O‐heterocycle ( 3 ) and a GeBC₃‐heterocycle ( 4 ). In the second case (4‐MeOC₆H₄)(Me)C inserts into the Ge?N bond of 2 while O is incorporated in the Ge?B bond to form a Ge‐centered spiroheterocycle ( 5 ). The reaction of 2 with tBuNC to give 6 , which has almost the same structure as 4 , proved the formation of the isonitrile during transformation from 2 and iPrNCO to 3 and 4 . The kinetic study of the reaction of 2 and iPrNCO gave evidence of proceeding through a GeBC₃O‐heterocycle intermediate. In addition, a DFT study was performed to elucidate the reaction mechanism.     

Synthesis and structures of the 2-(dimethylsila)pyrimidine derivatives (Ar = Ph, C6H4Bu-4; X = H, SiMe3, Li(hmpa)2, K(thf)3; n = 1, 2)

Five crystalline 2-(dimethylsila)pyrimidine derivatives (Z) have been prepared in excellent 1–4 or satisfactory 5 yield and characterised. The source of each was ultimately Li[CH(SiMe₂R)(SiMe₂OMe)] [R = Me (B) or OMe (I)]. Compound 1 (Z with Ar = Ph, X = SiMe₃, n = 1) was obtained from Z [with Ar = Ph, X = Li(OEt₂), n = 4; previously isolated from B [P.B. Hitchcock, M.F. Lappert, X.-H. Wei, J. Organomet. Chem. 689 (2004) 1342]] and Me₃SiCl. The potassium salt 2 [Z with Ar = C₆H₄Bu^t-4; X = K(thf)₃, n = 2] was made from K[CH(SiMe₃)(SiMe₂OMe)] (C) (via B) and 4-Bu^tC₆H₄CN. Treatment of 2 with 1,2-dibromoethane afforded 3 (Z with Ar = 4-Bu^tC₆H₄; X = H, n = 1); which when reacted with successively n-butyllithium and Me₃SiCl produced 4 (Z with Ar = 4-Bu^tC₆H₄, X = SiMe₃, n = 1). Compound 5 [Z with Ar = 4-Bu^tC₆H₄, X = Li(hmpa)₂, n = 1] resulted from I with 4-Bu^tC₆H₄CN and then OP(NMe₂)₃ (≡ hmpa). Plausible reaction pathways from the appropriate alkali metal alkyl C or I to 2 or 5, respectively, are suggested; these involve regiospecific 1,3-migrations of SiMe₂OMe from C → N and electrocyclic loss of Me₃SiOMe or SiMe₂(OMe)₂, respectively. The X-ray structures of crystalline 1, 2 and 5 are presented.     

Syntheses and Structures of Terminal Arylalumylene Complexes

Terminal arylalumylene complexes of platinum [Ar‐Al‐Pt(PCy₃)₂] (Ar=2,6‐[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂C₆H₃ (Bbp) or 2,6‐[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂‐4‐(tBu)C₆H₂ (Tbb)) have been synthesized either by the reaction of a dialumene–benzene adduct with [Pt(PCy₃)₂], or by the reduction of 1,2‐dibromodialumanes Ar(Br)Al‐Al(Br)Ar in the presence of [Pt(PCy₃)₂]. X‐Ray crystallographic analysis reveals that the Al? Pt bond lengths of these arylalumylene complexes are shorter than the previously reported shortest Al? Pt distance. DFT calculations suggest that the Al? Pt bonds in the arylalumylene complexes have a significantly high electrostatic character.     

Micron‐granula polyolefin with self‐immobilized nickel and iron diimine catalysts bearing one or two allyl groups

Self‐immobilized nickel and iron diimine catalysts bearing one or two allyl groups of [ArN?C]₂(C₁₀H₆)NiBr₂ [Ar = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₂] ( 1 ), [ArN?C(Me)][Ar′N? C(Me)]C₅H₃NFeCl₂ [Ar = Ar′ = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃, Ar = 2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃, and Ar′ = 4‐allyl‐2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₃] were synthesized and characterized. All three catalysts were investigated for olefin polymerization. As a result, these catalysts not only showed high activities as the catalyst free from the allyl group, such as [ArN?C]₂C₁₀H₆NiBr₂ (Ar = 2,6‐(i‐Pr)₂C₆H₂)], but also greatly improved the morphology of polymer particles to afford micron‐granula polyolefin. The self‐immobilization of catalysts, the formation mechanism of microspherical polymer, and the influence on the size of the particles are discussed. The molecular structure of self‐immobilized nickel catalyst 1 was also characterized by crystallographic analysis. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 1018–1024, 2004     

Rhodium‐ and ruthenium‐complex‐catalyzed condensation of ferrocene‐containing dithiols and diols with diarylsilanes to give silaferrocenophanes and ferrocene polymers

1,1′‐Ferrocenedithiol reacts with di(4‐methoxyphenyl)silane, diphenylsilane, and di(4‐fluorophenyl)silane in the presence of RhCl(PPh₃)₃ catalyst to give mixtures of 2,2‐diaryl‐1,3‐dithia‐2‐sila[3]ferrocenophanes (1a–3a) and ? (Fc? S? SiAr₂? S) _n? (Fc = 1,1′‐ferrocenylene; 1b: Ar = C₆H₄OMe‐4; 2b: Ar = Ph; 3b: Ar = C₆H₄F‐4). The products are isolated and characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The polymers 1b–3b, obtained from a toluene‐soluble fraction of the products, show GPC elution patterns corresponding to M_n values of 2700–4600 (polystyrene standards). The UV–vis spectra of the ferrocenophanes and polymers exhibit a d–d transition peak at about 440 nm, while the polymers show a π–π* transition peak at 320–330 nm. The cyclic voltammograms of 3a (Ar = C₆H₄F ? 4) and 3b show a reversible redox of the iron center at 0.27 V and 0.35 V (Ag⁺/Ag) respectively. Reaction of 1,1′‐ferrocenedimethanol with diphenylsilane in the presence of RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ catalyst results in selective formation of 3,3‐diphenyl‐2,4‐dioxa‐3‐sila[5]ferrocenophane ( 4 ), whose structure was determined by X‐ray crystallography. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis of linear and branched polyketones from the Rh complex catalyzed living alternating copolymerization of (4‐alkylphenyl)allene with CO

Copolymerization of (4‐hexylphenyl)allene and of (4‐dodecylphenyl)allene with carbon monoxide (1 atm) catalyzed by Rh[η³‐CH(Ar′)C{C(CHAr′)CH₂C (CHAr′)CH₂CH₂CHCHAr′}CH₂](PPh₃)₂ (A; Ar′ = C₆H₄OMe‐p) gives the corresponding polyketones: I‐[—CO—C(CHAr)—CH₂—]_n [1: Ar = C₆H₄C₆H₁₃‐p, 2 : Ar = C₆H₄C₁₂H₂₅‐p; I = CH₂C(CHAr′)C(CHAr′)CH₂C(CHAr′)CH₂CH₂CHCHAr′]. Molecular weights of the polyketone prepared from (4‐hexylphenyl)allene and CO are similar to the calculated from the monomer to initiator ratios until the molecular weight reaches to 45,000, indicating the living polymerization. Melting points of the polyketones I‐[—CO—C(CHC₆H₄R‐p)—CH₂—]_n (n = ca. 100) increase in the order R = C₁₂H₂₅ < C₆H₁₃ < C₄H₉ < CH₃ < H. Block and random copolymerization of phenylallene and (4‐alkylphenyl)allene with carbon monoxide gives the new copoly‐ ketones. The polymerization of a mixture of (4‐methylphenyl)allene and smaller amounts of bis(allenyl)benzene under CO afforded the polyketone with a crosslinked structure. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 1505–1511, 2000     

Diversification of ortho‐Fused Cycloocta‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Cores and Eight‐ to Six‐Ring Conversion by σ Bond C−C Cleavage

Sequential treatment of 2‐C₆H₄Br(CHO) with LiC≡CR¹ (R¹=SiMe₃, tBu), nBuLi, CuBr?SMe₂ and HC≡CCHClR² [R²=Ph, 4‐CF₃Ph, 3‐CNPh, 4‐(MeO₂C)Ph] at ?50 °C leads to formation of an intermediate carbanion (Z)‐1,2‐C₆H₄{C_A(=O)C≡C_BR¹}{CH=CH(CH^?)R²} ( 4 ). Low temperatures (?50 °C) favour attack at C_B leading to kinetic formation of 6,8‐bicycles containing non‐classical C‐carbanion enolates ( 5 ). Higher temperatures (?10 °C to ambient) and electron‐deficient R² favour retro σ‐bond C?C cleavage regenerating 4 , which subsequently closes on C_A providing 6,6‐bicyclic alkoxides ( 6 ). Computational modelling (CBS‐QB3) indicated that both pathways are viable and of similar energies. Reaction of 6 with H⁺ gave 1,2‐dihydronaphthalen‐1‐ols, or under dehydrating conditions, 2‐aryl‐1‐alkynylnaphthlenes. Enolates 5 react in situ with: H₂O, D₂O, I₂, allylbromide, S₂Me₂, CO₂ and lead to the expected C ‐E derivatives (E=H, D, I, allyl, SMe, CO₂H) in 49–64 % yield directly from intermediate 5 . The parents (E=H; R¹=SiMe₃, tBu; R²=Ph) are versatile starting materials for NaBH₄ and Grignard C=O additions, desilylation (when R¹=SiMe) and oxime formation. The latter allows formation of 6,9‐bicyclics via Beckmann rearrangement. The 6,8‐ring iodides are suitable Suzuki precursors for Pd‐catalysed C?C coupling (81–87 %), whereas the carboxylic acids readily form amides under T3P® conditions (71–95 %).     

Platinum trans‐Bis(borirene) Complexes Displaying Coplanarity and Communication Across a Platinum Metal Center

Ambient‐temperature photolysis of the aminoborylene complex [(OC)₅Cr?B?N(SiMe₃)₂] in the presence of a series of trans‐bis(alkynyl)platinum(II) precursors of the type trans‐[Pt(CCAr)₂(PEt₃)₂] (Ar=Ph, p‐C₆H₄OMe, and p‐C₆H₄CF₃) successfully leads to twofold transfer of the borylene moiety [ : B?N(SiMe₃)₂] onto the alkyne functionalities. The alkynyl precursors and resultant bis(borirene)platinum(II) complexes formed are of the type trans‐[Pt(B{?N(SiMe₃)₂}C?CAr)₂(PEt₃)₂] (Ar=Ph, p‐C₆H₄OMe, and p‐C₆H₄CF₃). These species have all been successfully characterized by NMR, IR, and UV/Vis spectroscopy as well as by elemental analysis. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction has verified that these trans‐bis(borirene)platinum(II) complexes display coplanarity between the twin three‐membered rings across the platinum core in the solid state and stand as the first examples of coplanar conformations of twin borirene systems. These complexes were modeled using density functional theory (DFT), providing information helpful in determining the ability of the transition metal core to interact with each individual borirene ring system and allowing for the observed coplanarity of these rings in the solid state. This proposed transition metal interaction with the twin borirene systems is manifested in the electronic characterization of these borirene species, which display divergent photophysical UV/Vis spectroscopic profiles compared to a previously published mono(borirene)platinum(II) complex.     

Nanostructured polymetallaynes of controlled length: Synthesis and characterization of oligomers and polymers from 1,1′‐bis‐(ethynyl)4,4′‐biphenyl bridging Pt(II) or Pd(II) centers

The reactivity of square planar palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes in trans or cis configuration, namely trans or cis‐[dichlorobis(tributylphosphine)platinum(II)] and trans‐[dichlorobis(tributylphosphine)palladium(II)] with 1,1′‐bis(ethynyl) 4,4′‐biphenyl, DEBP, leading to π‐conjugated organometallic oligomeric and polymeric metallaynes, was investigated by a systematic variation of the reaction conditions. The formation of polymers and oligomers with defined chain length [? M(PBu₃)₂ (C?C? C₆H₄? C₆H₄? C?C? )]_n (n = 3–10 for the oligomers, n = 20–50 for the polymers) depends on the configuration of the precursor Pt(II) and Pd(II) complexes, the presence/absence of the catalyst CuI, and the reaction time. A series of model reactions monitored by XPS, GPC, and NMR ³¹P spectroscopy showed the route to modulate the chain growth. As expected, the nature of the transition metal (Pt or Pd) and the molecular weight of the polymers markedly influence the photophysical characteristics of the polymetallaynes, such as optical absorption and emission behavior. Polymetallaynes with nanostructured morphology could be obtained by a simple casting procedure of polymer solutions. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 3311–3329, 2007     

Hydrogallierungsreaktionen mit den Monoalkinen H5C6‐C≡C‐SiMe3 und H5C6‐C≡C‐CMe3 – cis/trans‐Isomerie und Substituentenaustausch

Hydrogallation Reactions Involving the Monoalkynes H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃ and H₅C₆‐C≡C‐CMe₃ – cis/trans Isomerisation and Substituent Exchange Phenyl‐trimethylsilylethyne, H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃, reacted with different dialkylgallium hydrides, R₂Ga‐H (R = Me, Et, nPr, iPr, tBu), by the addition of one Ga‐H bond to its C≡C triple bond (hydrogallation). The gallium atoms attacked selectively those carbon atoms, which were also attached to trimethylsilyl groups. The cis arrangement of Ga and H across the resulting C=C double bonds resulted only for the sterically most shielded di(tert‐butyl)gallium derivative, while in all other cases spontaneous cis/trans rearrangement occurred with the quantitative formation of the trans addition products. The diethyl compound Et₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅ ( 2 ) gave by substituent exchange the secondary products EtGa[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₂ ( 7 , Z,Z) and Ga[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₃ ( 8 ). Interestingly, compound 8 has two alkenyl groups with a Z configuration, while the third C=C double bond has the cis arrangement of Ga and H (E configuration). The reversibility of the cis/trans isomerisation of hydrogallation products was observed for the first time. tert‐Butyl‐phenylethyne gave the simple addition product, R₂Ga(C₆H₅)=C(H)‐CMe₃ ( 9 ), only with di(n‐propyl)gallium hydride.     

Synthesis of poly-yne polymer containing platinum and silicon atoms in the main chain by oxidative coupling and its reactions with transition-metal carbonyl complexes

The platinum poly-yne polymer, [? C?C? SiMe₂? C?C? Pt(PBu₃)₂? C?C? SiMe₂? C?C? ]_n (2), was synthesized by the oxidative coupling of a silicon–platinum monomer, trans-(PBu₃)₂Pt(C?C? SiMe₂–C?CH)₂ (1). The reaction of platinum poly-yne polymer 2 with dicobaltoctacarbonyl gave μ-coordinated complexes, {[? C?C? SiMe₂? C?C? Pt(PBu₃)₂? C?C? SiMe₂? C?C? ] [Co₂(Co)₆]₂}_n (4). the electric conductivity of iodine adducts of the polymer complexes 4 was 3.0×10^?5 S cm^?1. As an aid to spectroscopic characterization of the polymer complex 4, a model complex, {trans-[(PBu₃)₂Pt? (C?C? SiMe₂? C?CH)₂]} {[Co₂(CO)₆]₂} (3), was also prepared by the reaction of 1 with dicobaltocatacarbonyl. Selective coordination of Co₂(CO)₆ groups to ? SiMe₂? C?C C?C? Si(Me)₂? Moieties and coordinative inertness of the Pt? C?C? moieties were confirmed by comparison of the NMR spectra of 3 with those of 4. All new compounds have been characterized by analytical and spectral analysis (IR, ¹H NMR).     

Lutetium‐Methanediide‐Alkyl Complexes: Synthesis and Chemistry

The first four‐coordinate methanediide/alkyl lutetium complex (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐CHSiMe₃)(THF)₂ (BODDI=ArNC(Me)CHCOCHC(Me)NAr, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) ( 1 ) was synthesized by a thermolysis methodology through α‐H abstraction from a Lu–CH₂SiMe₃ group. Complex 1 reacted with equimolar 2,6‐iPrC₆H₃NH₂ and Ph₂C?O to give the corresponding lutetium bridging imido and oxo complexes (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐N‐2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)(THF)₂ ( 2 ) and (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐O)(THF)₂ ( 3 ). Treatment of 3 with Ph₂C?O (4 equiv) caused a rare insertion of Lu–μ₂‐O bond into the C?O group to afford a diphenylmethyl diolate complex 4 . Reaction of 1 with PhN=C?O (2 equiv) led to the migration of SiMe₃ to the amido nitrogen atom to give complex (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂‐μ‐{PhNC(O)CHC(O)NPh(SiMe₃)‐κ³N,O,O}(THF) ( 5 ). Reaction of 1 with tBuN?C formed an unprecedented product (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃){μ₂‐[η²:η²‐tBuNC(=CH₂)SiMe₂CHC?NtBu‐κ¹N]}(tBuN?C)₂ ( 6 ) through a cascade reaction of N?C bond insertion, sequential cyclometalative γ‐(sp³)‐H activation, C?C bond formation, and rearrangement of the newly formed carbene intermediate. The possible mechanistic pathways between 1 , PhN?C?O, and tBuN?C were elucidated by DFT calculations.     

Preparation of linear α‐olefins to high‐molecular weight polyethylenes using cationic α‐diimine nickel(II) complexes containing chloro‐substituted ligands

A series of α‐diimine nickel(II) complexes containing chloro‐substituted ligands, [(Ar)N?C(C₁₀H₆)C?N(Ar)]NiBr₂ ( 4a , Ar = 2,3‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4b , Ar = 2,4‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4c , Ar = 2,5‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4d , Ar = 2,6‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4e , Ar = 2,4,6‐C₆H₂Cl₃) and [(Ar)N?C(C₁₀H₆)C?N(Ar)]₂NiBr₂ ( 5a , Ar = 2,3‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 5b , Ar = 2,4‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 5c , Ar = 2,5‐C₆H₃Cl₂), have been synthesized and investigated as precatalysts for ethylene polymerization. In the presence of modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO) as a cocatalyst, these complexes are highly effective catalysts for the oligomerization or polymerization of ethylene under mild conditions. The catalyst activity and the properties of the products were strongly affected by the aryl‐substituents of the ligands used. Depending on the catalyst structure, it is possible to obtain the products ranging from linear α‐olefins to high‐molecular weight polyethylenes. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 1964–1974, 2006     

Radiation effects on silicon-containing polyacetylenes

Si-containing mono- and disubstituted polyacetylenes(? [CMe?C(SiMe₃)] _n? , ? [CH?H(n? C₅H₁₁)SiMe₃]_n? , etc.) underwent degradation in air; many of them exhibited relatively high yields of main-chain scission (G_s > 1). The G_s values for the polymers having a long n-alkyl group were usually large (ca. 2). In contrast, no polymer degradation occurred in vacuum, indicating that oxygen is necessary for the radiolysis. The polymers irradiated in air contained C?O and Si? O groups, and dissolved in polar solvents, which are nonsolvents of the starting polymers. From the radiation sensitivity and thermal degradability of these polymers, it is concluded that disubstituted polymers with high Si contents (? [CMe?C(SiMe₃)]_n? , ? [CMe?C(SiMe₂CH₂SiMe₃)]_n? , etc.) are not only radiation-sensitive but also thermally stable.     

The Effect of Electron-Donating and Electron-Withdrawing Substituents on 1H-and 13C-NMR chemical shifts of novel 7′-aryl-substituted 7′-apo-β-carotenes

The synthesis of 7′-aryl-7′-apo-β-carotenes, where aryl (Ar) is Ph, 4-NO₂C₆H₄, 4-MeOC₆H₄, 4-(MeO₂C)C₆H₄, C₆F₅, and 2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂, is described. NMR Chemical shifts of all H- and C-atoms are presented, together with specific examples of the spectra. In contrast to ¹H chemical shifts which, except for H? C(8′) and H? C(7′), did not differ greatly from those of β,β-carotene, considerable variations in ¹³C chemical shifts were observed. Signals of the C(α) atoms of the polyene chain [C(β)? C(α)] +_n Ar were shielded, those of the C(β) atoms were deshielded, with some exceptions when n = 1; the effects decreased with increasing n.