Frame definability in finitely valued modal logics

In this paper we study frame definability in finitely valued modal logics and establish two main results via suitable translations: (1) in finitely valued modal logics one cannot define more classes of frames than are already definable in classical modal logic (cf. [27, Thm. 8]), and (2) a large family of finitely valued modal logics define exactly the same classes of frames as classical modal logic (including modal logics based on finite Heyting and MV-algebras, or even BL-algebras). In this way one may observe, for example, that the celebrated Goldblatt–Thomason theorem applies immediately to these logics. In particular, we obtain the central result from [26] with a much simpler proof and answer one of the open questions left in that paper. Moreover, the proposed translations allow us to determine the computational complexity of a big class of finitely valued modal logics.     

On intuitionistic modal and tense logics and their classical companion logics: Topological semantics and bisimulations

We take the well-known intuitionistic modal logic of Fischer Servi with semantics in bi-relational Kripke frames, and give the natural extension to topological Kripke frames. Fischer Servi’s two interaction conditions relating the intuitionistic pre-order (or partial-order) with the modal accessibility relation generalize to the requirement that the relation and its inverse be lower semi-continuous with respect to the topology. We then investigate the notion of topological bisimulation relations between topological Kripke frames, as introduced by Aiello and van Benthem, and show that their topology-preserving conditions are equivalent to the properties that the inverse relation and the relation are lower semi-continuous with respect to the topologies on the two models. The first main result is that this notion of topological bisimulation yields semantic preservation w.r.t. topological Kripke models for both intuitionistic tense logics, and for their classical companion multi-modal logics in the setting of the Gödel translation. After giving canonical topological Kripke models for the Hilbert-style axiomatizations of the Fischer Servi logic and its classical companion logic, we use the canonical model in a second main result to characterize a Hennessy–Milner class of topological models between any pair of which there is a maximal topological bisimulation that preserve the intuitionistic semantics.     

The Skolemization of prenex formulas in intermediate logics

The skolem class of a logic consists of the formulas for which the derivability of the formula is equivalent to the derivability of its Skolemization. In contrast to classical logic, the skolem classes of many intermediate logics do not contain all formulas. In this paper it is proven for certain classes of propositional formulas that any instance of them by (independent) predicate sentences in prenex normal form belongs to the skolem class of any intermediate logic complete with respect to a class of well-founded trees. In particular, all prenex sentences belong to the skolem class of these logics, and this result extends to the constant domain versions of these logics.     

Completeness of intermediate logics with doubly negated axioms

Let denote a first‐order logic in a language that contains infinitely many constant symbols and also containing intuitionistic logic . By , we mean the associated logic axiomatized by the double negation of the universal closure of the axioms of plus . We shall show that if is strongly complete for a class of Kripke models , then is strongly complete for the class of Kripke models that are ultimately in .     

Classically complete modal relevant logics

A variety of modal logics based on the relevant logic R are presented. Models are given for each of these logics and completeness is shown. It is also shown that each of these logics admits Ackermann's rule γ and as a corollary of this it is proved that each logic is a conservative extension of its counterpart based on classical logic, hence we call them “classically complete”. MSC: 03B45, 03B46.     

Clausal resolution for normal modal logics

We present a clausal resolution-based method for normal modal logics. Differently from other approaches, where inference rules are based on the syntax of a particular set of axioms, we focus on the restrictions imposed on the binary accessibility relation for each particular normal logic. We provide soundness and completeness results for all fifteen families of multi-modal normal logics whose accessibility relations have the property of being non-restricted, reflexive, serial, transitive, Euclidean, or symmetric.     

Analyzing completeness of axiomatic functional systems for temporal × modal logics

In previous works, we presented a modification of the usual possible world semantics by introducing an independent temporal structure in each world and using accessibility functions to represent the relation among them. Different properties ofthe accessibility functions (being injective, surjective, increasing, etc.) have been considered and axiomatic systems (called functional) which define these properties have been given. Only a few ofthese systems have been proved tobe complete. The aim ofthis paper is to make a progress in the study ofcompleteness for functional systems. For this end, we use indexes as names for temporal flows and give new proofs of completeness. Specifically, we focus our attention on the system which defines injectivity, because the system which defines this property without using indexes was proved to be incomplete in previous works. The only system considered which remains incomplete is the one which defines surjectivity, even ifwe consider a sequence ofnatural extensions ofthe previous one (© 2010 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Modal sequents for normal modal logics

We present sequent calculi for normal modal logics where modal and propositional behaviours are separated, and we prove a cut elimination theorem for the basic system K, so as completeness theorems (in the new style) both for K itself and for its most popular enrichments. MSC: 03B45, 03F05.     

Complexity of admissible rules

We investigate the computational complexity of deciding whether a given inference rule is admissible for some modal and superintuitionistic logics. We state a broad condition under which the admissibility problem is coNEXP-hard. We also show that admissibility in several well-known systems (including GL, S4, and IPC) is in coNE, thus obtaining a sharp complexity estimate for admissibility in these systems. The research was done while the author was visiting the Department of Philosophy of the Utrecht University. Supported by grant IAA1019401 of GA AV ČR     

FINITE REPLACEMENT AND FINITE HILBERT-STYLE AXIOMATIZABILITY

We define a property for varieties V, the f.r.p. (finite replacement property). If it applies to a finitely based V then V is strongly finitely based in the sense of [14], see Theorem 2. Moreover, we obtain finite axiomatizability results for certain propositional logics associated with V, in its generality comparable to well-known finite base results from equational logic. Theorem 3 states that each variety generated by a 2-element algebra has the f.r.p. Essentially this implies finite axiomatizability of a 2-valued logic in any finite language.     

Algorithmic correspondence and canonicity for non-distributive logics

We extend the theory of unified correspondence to a broad class of logics with algebraic semantics given by varieties of normal lattice expansions (LEs), also known as ‘lattices with operators’. Specifically, we introduce a syntactic definition of the class of Sahlqvist formulas and inequalities which applies uniformly to each LE-signature and is given purely in terms of the order-theoretic properties of the algebraic interpretations of the logical connectives. We also introduce the algorithm ALBA, parametric in each LE-setting, which effectively computes first-order correspondents of LE-inequalities, and is guaranteed to succeed on a wide class of inequalities (the so-called inductive inequalities) which significantly extend the Sahlqvist class. Further, we show that every inequality on which ALBA succeeds is canonical. Projecting these results on specific signatures yields state-of-the-art correspondence and canonicity theory for many well known modal expansions of classical and intuitionistic logic and for substructural logics, from classical poly-modal logics to (bi-)intuitionistic modal logics to the Lambek calculus and its extensions, the Lambek-Grishin calculus, orthologic, the logic of (not necessarily distributive) De Morgan lattices, and the multiplicative-additive fragment of linear logic.     

On decidable,finitely axiomatizable,modal and tense logics without the finite model property Part I

Decidability results in modal and tense logics were obtained through the finite model property. This paper shows that the method is limited, since there exists a decidable extension of modalT that lacks the finite model property. The decidability of the system is proved through a new method, thereduction method, (using a theorem of Rabin).     

On decidable,finitely axiomatizable,modal and tense logics without the finite model property Part II

This paper is a continuation of Part I. A decidable extension of model K4 that lacks the finite model property is described. It is not known whether there are extensions of B that are decidable and lack the finite model property.     

The finite model property for semilinear substructural logics

In this paper, we show that the finite model property fails for certain non‐integral semilinear substructural logics including Metcalfe and Montagna's uninorm logic and involutive uninorm logic, and a suitable extension of Metcalfe, Olivetti and Gabbay's pseudo‐uninorm logic. Algebraically, the results show that certain classes of bounded residuated lattices that are generated as varieties by their linearly ordered members are not generated as varieties by their finite members.