Supramolecular bis(rutheniumphthalocyanine)-Perylenediimide ensembles: simple complexation as a powerful tool toward long-lived radical ion pair states

A novel supramolecular electron donor-acceptor hybrid (1) has been designed through axial coordination of a perylenebisimide moiety [BPyPDI], bearing two 4-pyridyl substituents at the imido positions, to the ruthenium(II) metal centers of two phthalocyanines [Ru(CO)Pc]. This modular protocol enables access to electron donor-acceptor hybrids with potentially great design flexibility. The new array (1) has been characterized by standard spectroscopic methods, and its photophysical behavior has been established by using ultrafast and fast time-resolved techniques. Photoexcitation of either chromophore leads to a product that is essentially identical for both pathways, that is, evolving from the [Ru(CO)Pc] or [BPyPDI] singlet excited state. Features of the photoproduct are new transient maxima at 530 and 725 nm, plus transient minima at 580 nm and 650 nm. Based on the radiolytically generated [BPyPDI*-] (i.e., one-electron reduction of [BPyPDI]) and [Ru(CO)Pc*+] (i.e., one-electron oxidation of [Ru(CO)Pc]) features, which in the 300 and 900 nm range remarkably resemble those noted for photoexcited 1, we attribute the photolytically generated species to the composite spectrum of the [Ru(CO)Pc*+ -BPyPDI*- -RuCOPc] radical ion pair state. Its lifetime, which is on the order of 115 +/- 5 ns, reveals a significant stabilization and confirms that the strongly exothermic charge recombination dynamics are placed deeply in the inverted region of the Marcus parabola.     

Assembling a Phthalocyanine and Perylenediimide Donor–Acceptor Hybrid through a Platinum(II) Diacetylide Linker

In a novel electron‐donor–acceptor conjugate, phthalocyanine (Pc) and perylenediimide (PDI) are connected through a trans‐platinum(II) diacetylide linker to yield Pc‐Pt‐PDI 1 . In the ground state, the presence of Pt^II disrupts the electronic communication between the two electroactive components, as revealed by UV/Vis spectroscopy and electrochemical studies. The photophysical behavior of 1 is compared with that of the corresponding Pc‐PDI electron‐donor–acceptor conjugate 2 in terms of charge separation and charge recombination. The insertion of Pt^II between Pc and PDI impacts the results in a longer‐lived Pc ^{. +}/PDI ^{. ?} radical ion‐pair state. In addition, the intermediately formed Pc triplet excited state is formed with higher quantum yields in 1 than in 2 .     

The laser-induced fluorescence spectrum, Renner-Teller effect, and molecular quantum beats in the A (2)Pi(i)-X (2)Pi(i) transition of the jet-cooled HCCSe free radical

The selenoketyl (HCCSe) radical has been positively identified for the first time as a product of an electric discharge through selenophene vapor. Laser-induced fluorescence, wavelength resolved emission, and fluorescence decay studies of jet-cooled HCCSe and DCCSe have given a detailed picture of the ground and excited state. The 418-400 nm band system of the HCCSe radical is assigned as A (2)Pi(i)-X (2)Pi(i) and the available evidence suggests that the radical is linear in the ground state and quasilinear in the excited state. The fluorescence decays of some upper state rotational levels show field-free molecular quantum beats, ascribed to an internal conversion interaction with high vibrational levels of the ground state. A comparison of the molecular structures and bonding in the HCCX (X=O,S,Se) free radicals shows that nonlinear ground state HCCO is best described as the ketenyl radical (H[Single Bond]C[Double Bond]C[Double Bond]O) with the unpaired electron on the terminal carbon atom, whereas HCCS and HCCSe have linear ground state acetylenic (H[Single Bond]C[Triple Bond]C[Single Bond]X) structures with the unpaired electron on the heteroatom. On electronic excitation, B (2)Pi HCCO reverts to the linear acetylenic structure, and A (2)Pi HCCS and HCCSe become quasilinear with the allenic structure.     

Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of a Sc3N@C80‐Corrole Electron Donor–Acceptor Conjugate

Embedding endohdedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) into electron donor–acceptor systems is still a challenging task owing to their limited quantities and their still largely unexplored chemical properties. In this study, we have performed a 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition reaction of a corrole‐based precursor with Sc₃N@C₈₀ to regioselectively form a [5,6]‐adduct ( 1 ). The successful attachment of the corrole moiety was confirmed by mass spectrometry. In the electronic ground state, absorption spectra suggest sizeable electronic communications between the electron acceptor and the electron donor. Moreover, the addition pattern occurring at a [5,6]‐bond junction is firmly proven by NMR spectroscopy and electrochemical investigations performed with 1 . In the electronically excited state, which is probed in photophysical assays with 1 , a fast electron‐transfer yields the radical ion pair state consisting of the one‐electron‐reduced Sc₃N@C₈₀ and of the one‐electron‐oxidized corrole upon its exclusive photoexcitation. As such, our results shed new light on the practical work utilizing EMFs as building blocks in photovoltaics.     

Theoretical studies on Ru(fppz)2(CO)L (L = N-heterocyclic ligand): Electronic structure, absorption, phosphorescence, and solvatochromism

A series of ruthenium(II) complexes Ru(fppz)₂(CO)L [fppz = 3-trifluoromethyl-5(2-pyridyl)pyrazole; L = pyridine (1), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (2), 4-cyanopyridine (3)] were designed and investigated theoretically to explore their electronic structures, absorption, and emissions as well as the solvatochromism. The singlet ground state and triplet excited state geometries were fully optimized at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ and CIS/LANL2DZ level, respectively. The HOMO of 1–3 is composed of d_yz(Ru) atom and π(fppz). The LUMO of 1 and 2 is dominantly contributed by π*(fppz) orbital, but that of 3 is contribute by π*(L). Absorption and phosphorescence in vacuo, C₆H₁₂, and CH₃CN media were calculated using the TD-DFT level of theory with the PCM model based on the optimized ground and excited state geometries, respectively. The lowest-lying absorption of 1 and 2 at 387 and 391 nm is attributed to {[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] → [π*(fppz)]} transition, but that of 3 at 479 nm is assigned to {[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] → [π*(L)]} transition. The phosphorescence of 1 and 2 at 436 and 438 nm originates from ³{[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] [π*(fppz)]} excited state, while that of 3 at 606 nm is from ³{[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] [π*(L)]} excited state. The calculation results showed that the absorption and emission transition character can be changed from MLCT/ILCT to MLCT/LLCT transition by altering the substituent on the L ligand. The phosphorescence of 1 and 2 does not have solvatochromism, but that of 3 at 606 nm (vacuo), 584 nm (C₆H₁₂), and 541 nm (CH₃CN) is strongly dependent on the solvent polarity, so introducing electron-withdrawing group on ligand L will induce remarkable solvatochromism.     

A fully conjugated TTF-π-TCAQ system: synthesis, structure, and electronic properties

The synthesis of the first fully conjugated tetrathiafulvalene–tetracyano‐p‐quinodimethane ((TTF)–TCNQ)‐type system has been carried out by means of a Julia–Kocienski olefination reaction. In particular, a tetracyanoanthraquinodimethane (TCAQ) formyl derivative and two new sulfonylmethyl‐exTTFs (exTTF=2‐[9‐(1,3‐dithiol‐2‐ylidene)anthracen‐10(9H)‐ylidene]‐1,3‐dithiole)—prepared as new building blocks—were linked. A variety of experimental conditions reveal that the use of sodium hexamethyldisilazane (NaHMDS) as base in THF afforded the E olefins with excellent stereoselectivity. Theoretical calculations at the B3LYP/6‐31G** level point to highly distorted exTTF and TCAQ that form an almost planar stilbene unit between them. Although calculations predicted appreciable electronic communication between the donor and the acceptor, cyclic voltammetric studies did not substantiate this effect. It was only in photophysical assays that the electronic communication emerged in the form of a charge‐transfer (CT) absorption and emission. Once photoexcited (i.e., the locally excited state or excited charge‐transfer state), an ultrafast, subpicosecond charge separation leads to a radical ion pair state in which the spectroscopic features of the radical cation of exTTF as well as the radical anion of TCAQ are discernable. The radical ion pair is metastable and undergoes a fast ((1.0±0.2) ps) charge recombination to reconstitute the electronic ground state. Such ultrafast charge separation and recombination processes come as a consequence of the very short vinyl linkage between the two electroactive units.     

Synthesis, characterization, and electronic structures of a series of two-dimensional trimetallic cluster complexes, Ru3(CO)9(mu-SnPh2)3[Pt(PBu(t)3)]x, x = 0-3

The triruthenium-tritin cluster complex, Ru3(CO)9(mu-SnPh2)3, 13 was obtained from the reaction of Ru3(CO)12 with Ph3SnH. Compound 13 reacts with Pt(PBut3)2 to yield three new Pt(PBut3) adducts of 13 Ru3(CO)9(mu-SnPh2)3[Pt(PBut3)]x, 14-16 x = 1 - 3 formed by the addition of Pt(PBut3) groups to the Ru-Sn bonds. The new complexes form a novel series of trimetallic complexes having planar arrangements of the metal atoms. The UV-vis absorptions of the four complexes shift progressively to longer wavelengths as the number of platinum atoms is added to the cluster. The electronic structures of these complexes have been investigated in the ground and excited states by density functional theory and time-dependent density functional theory, and this has provided a detailed understanding of the metal-metal bonding and electronic transitions that are responsible for their UV-vis absorption properties. The predicted absorption maximum for the model structures for 13, 14, 15, and 16 at 465, 508, 556, and 585 nm differ only 4-18 nm from the experimental values of 474, 490, 552, and 576 nm. The shift of principal UV-vis absorption can be explained by a lowering of the HOMO-LUMO energy gap due to interactions of the platinum atoms with the HOMO and LUMO of the Ru3Sn3 core.     

Ultrafast photochemical dissociation of an equatorial CO ligand from trans(X,X)-[Ru(X)2(CO)2(bpy)] (X = Cl, Br, I): a picosecond time-resolved infrared spectroscopic and DFT computational study

Ultrafast photochemistry of the complexes trans(X,X)-[Ru(X)(2)(CO)(2)(bpy)] (X = Cl, Br, I) was studied in order to understand excited-state reactivity of equatorial CO ligands, coordinated trans to the 2,2'-bipyridine ligand (bpy). TD-DFT calculations have identified the lowest electronic transitions and singlet excited states as mixed X -->bpy/Ru --> bpy ligand to ligand/metal to ligand charge transfer (LLCT/MLCT). Picosecond time-resolved IR spectroscopy in the region of nu(CO) vibrations has revealed that, for X = Cl and Br, subpicosecond CO dissociation is accompanied by bending of the X-Ru-X moiety, producing a pentacoordinated intermediate trans(X,X)-[Ru(X)(2)(CO)(bpy)]. Final movement of an axial halide ligand to the vacant equatorial position and solvent (CH(3)CN) coordination follows with a time constant of 13-15 ps, forming the photoproduct cis(X,X)-[Ru(X)(2)(CO)(CH(3)CN)(bpy)]. For X = I, the optically populated (1)LLCT/MLCT excited state undergoes a simultaneous subpicosecond CO dissociation and relaxation to a triplet IRuI-localized excited state which involves population of an orbital that is sigma-antibonding with respect to the axial I-Ru-I bonds. Vibrationally relaxed photoproduct cis(I,I)-[Ru(I)(2)(CO)(CH(3)CN)(bpy)] is formed with a time constant of ca. 55 ps. The triplet excited state is unreactive, decaying to the ground state with a 155 ps lifetime. The experimentally observed photochemical intermediates and excited states were assigned by comparing calculated (DFT) and experimental IR spectra. The different behavior of the chloro and bromo complexes from that of the iodo complex is caused by different characters of the lowest triplet excited states.     

Visible-light-driven photoreactions of [(bpy)2Ru(II)L]Cl2 in aqueous solutions (bpy = bipyridine, l = 1,2-bis(4-(4'-methyl)-2,2'-bipyridyl) ethene)

Visible-light-induced photoreactions of [(bpy)2Ru(II)L]Cl2 (bpy = bipyridine, L = trans-1,2-bis(4-(4'-methyl)-2,2'-bipyridyl) ethene) in aqueous solution are examined. From pH titrations, it is found that the Ru complex is a stronger base (pKa* = 6) in the excited state than in the ground state (pKa = 4). Photolysis of the [(bpy)2Ru(II)L] complex in solutions at pH 7 and 12 led to formation of species with increased emission quantum yields, approximately 55 nm blue-shift of the emission maximum to 625 nm, and disappearance of the absorption band at 330 nm, the latter arising from the olefinic bond of the L ligand. No spectral changes are observed in solutions at pH < or = 4. With the help of chromatography, mass spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and NMR, photoproducts formed at neutral pH have been analyzed. It is found that the major product is a dimer of [(bpy)2Ru(II)L], dimerizing around the double bond. Photoreactions do not occur in the dark or in the aprotic solvent acetonitrile. We propose that a Ru(III) radical intermediate is formed by photoinduced excited-state electron and proton transfer, which initiates the dimerization. The radical intermediate can also undergo photochemical degradative reductions. Below pH 4, the emission quenching is proposed to arise via protonation of the monoprotonated [(bpy)2Ru(II)LH] followed by electron transfer to the viologen-type moiety created by protonation. The products of photodegradation at pH > 12 are different from those of pH 7, but the mechanism of the degradation at pH > 12 was not elucidated.     

Emission band shape probes of the mixed-valence excited state properties of polypyridyl-bridged bis-ruthenium(II) complexes

The absorption spectra and emission spectral band shapes of several polypyridine-ligand (PP) bridged bis-ruthenium(II) complexes imply that the Ru(II)/Ru(III) electronic coupling is weak in their lowest energy metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited states. Many of these PP-bridging ligands contain pyrazine moieties and the weak electronic coupling of the excited states contrasts to the strong electronic coupling inferred for the correlated mixed-valence ground states. Although the bimetallic complexes emit at significantly lower energy than their monometallic analogs, the vibronic contributions to their 77 K emission spectra are much stronger than expected based on comparison to the monometallic analogs (around twofold in some complexes) and this feature is characteristic of bimetallic complexes in which the mixed-valence excited states are electronically localized. The weaker excited state than ground state donor/acceptor electronic coupling in this class of complexes is attributed to PP-mediated super-exchange coupling in which the mediating orbital of the bridging ligand (PP-LUMO) is partly occupied in the MLCT excited states, but is unoccupied in the ground states; therefore, the vertical Ru(III)-PP⁻ (MLCT) energy is larger and the mixing coefficient smaller in these excited states than is found for Ru(II)-PP in the corresponding ground states.     

The photolysis of Chlorocarbonylbis(triphenylphosphine)iridium(I) in chloroform

Under 254 or 313 nm irradiation in chloroform, [IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2] is converted cleanly to [IrCl2(CO)H(PPh3)2] through the addition of HCl, produced photochemically. Under 254 nm irradiation, some of the reaction of [IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2] occurs by direct photolysis of chloroform, though a greater contribution arises from a reaction initiated through absorption of light by the metal complex. Under 313 nm irradiation, essentially all of the reaction is metal-initiated. The linear dependence of the reaction rate on light intensity and on the fraction of light absorbed by the Ir(I) complex as well as the lack of a deuterium isotope effect rule out a radical process. Instead it is proposed that an association complex between excited state [IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2] and CHCl3 leads to dissociation of a chlorine atom from CHCl3, yielding HCl after abstraction of a hydrogen from another CHCl3. HCl then adds to a ground state [IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2] complex.     

Theoretical studies on the excited states, DNA photocleavage, and spectral properties of complex [Ru(phen)(2)(6-OH-dppz)](2+)

The structures and related properties of the complex [Ru(phen)2(6-OH-dppz)]2+ (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline; dppz = dipyrido [3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine) in the ground state (S0), the first singlet excited state (S1), and the first triplet excited state (T1) have been studied using density functional theory (DFT), time-dependent (TD) DFT, Hartree-Fock (HF), and configuration interaction singles (CIS) methods. Three electronic absorption-spectral bands (1MLCT, 1LL, and 1LL) lying in the range of 250-550 nm in vacuo and in aqueous solution were theoretically calculated, simulated, and assigned with TDDFT method. In particular, the theoretical results show the following: (1) The positive charges of central Ru atom in the excited states (S1 and T1) are greatly increased relative to those in the ground state (S0), and thus the Ru atom in the excited states can be regarded as Ru(III). (2) The positive charges on the main ligand (6-OH-dppz) in the excited states are considerably reduced, and thus the interaction between the main ligand (intercalative ligand) and DNA base pairs is considerably weakened. (3) The geometric structures in excited states are also distorted, resulting in obvious increase in the coordination bond length. It is advantageous to the complex forming a high oxidizing center (i.e., Ru(III) ion). On the basis of these results, a theoretical explanation on photoinduced oxidation reduction mechanism of DNA photocleavage by [Ru(phen)2(6-OH-dppz)](2+) has been presented.     

Theoretical studies on Ru(fppz)2(CO)L (L = N -heterocyclic ligand): Electronic structure, absorption, phosphorescence, and solvatochromism

A series of ruthenium(II) complexes Ru(fppz)₂(CO)L [fppz = 3-trifluoromethyl-5(2-pyridyl)pyrazole; L = pyridine (1), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (2), 4-cyanopyridine (3)] were designed and investigated theoretically to explore their electronic structures, absorption, and emissions as well as the solvatochromism. The singlet ground state and triplet excited state geometries were fully optimized at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ and CIS/LANL2DZ level, respectively. The HOMO of 1–3 is composed of d_yz(Ru) atom and π(fppz). The LUMO of 1 and 2 is dominantly contributed by π*(fppz) orbital, but that of 3 is contribute by π*(L). Absorption and phosphorescence in vacuo, C₆H₁₂, and CH₃CN media were calculated using the TD-DFT level of theory with the PCM model based on the optimized ground and excited state geometries, respectively. The lowest-lying absorption of 1 and 2 at 387 and 391 nm is attributed to {[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] → [π*(fppz)]} transition, but that of 3 at 479 nm is assigned to {[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] → [π*(L)]} transition. The phosphorescence of 1 and 2 at 436 and 438 nm originates from ³{[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] [π*(fppz)]} excited state, while that of 3 at 606 nm is from ³{[d_yz(Ru) + π(fppz)] [π*(L)]} excited state. The calculation results showed that the absorption and emission transition character can be changed from MLCT/ILCT to MLCT/LLCT transition by altering the substituent on the L ligand. The phosphorescence of 1 and 2 does not have solvatochromism, but that of 3 at 606 nm (vacuo), 584 nm (C₆H₁₂), and 541 nm (CH₃CN) is strongly dependent on the solvent polarity, so introducing electron-withdrawing group on ligand L will induce remarkable solvatochromism. Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 20573042, 20703015, and 20333050)     

Nanosecond CO photodissociation and excited-state character of [Ru(X)(X')(CO)2(N,N'-diisopropyl-1,4-diazabutadiene)] (X=X'=Cl or I; X=Me, X'=I; X=SnPh3, X'=Cl) studied by time-resolved infrared spectroscopy and DFT calculations

The character and dynamics of the low-lying excited states of [Ru(X)(X')(CO)2(iPr-dab)] (X=X'=Cl or I; X=Me, X'=I; X=SnPh3, X'=Cl; iPr-dab=N, N'-diisopropyl-1,4-diazabutadiene) were studied experimentally by pico- and nanosecond time-resolved IR spectroscopy (TRIR) and (for X=X'=Cl or I) computationally using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) techniques. The lowest allowed electronic transition occurs between 390 and 460 nm and involves charge transfer from the Ru(halide)(CO) 2 unit to iPr-dab, denoted (1)MLCT/XLCT (metal-to-ligand/halide-to-ligand charge transfer). The lowest triplet state is well modeled by UKS-DFT-CPCM calculations, which quite accurately reproduce the excited-state IR spectrum in the nu(CO) region. It has a (3)MLCT/XLCT character with an intraligand (iPr-dab) (3)pipi* admixture. TRIR spectra of the lowest triplet excited state show two nu(CO) bands that are shifted to higher energies from their corresponding ground-state positions. The magnitude of this upward shift increases as a function of the ligands X and X' [(I)2 < (Sn)(Cl) < (Me)(I) < (Cl)2] and reveals increasing contribution of the Ru(CO)2-->dab MLCT character to the excited state. The lowest triplet state of [Ru(Cl)2(CO)2(iPr-dab)] undergoes a approximately 10 ps relaxation that is followed by CO dissociation, producing cis(CO,CH 3CN),trans(Cl,Cl)-[Ru(Cl)2(CH 3CN)(CO)(iPr-dab)] with a unity quantum yield and 7.2 ns lifetime and without any observable intermediate. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a "slow" CO dissociation from a thermally equilibrated triplet charge-transfer excited state.     

Experimental investigation of excited state electron transfer reactions between some bicyclic molecules and tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ)

Investigations on photoinduced electron transfer (ET) reactions between excited (ground) bicyclic electron donors 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthol (TH2N), 2-methoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro naphthalene (2MTHN) and ground state (excited) acceptor tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) in fluid solutions of different polarity at the ambient temperature (300 K) by electronic absorption, steady state fluorescence and time-resolved spectroscopic methods in the time domain of nanosecond order have been carried out. It is suggested that in highly polar solvent acetonitrile (ACN), a loosely-structured transient geminate ion-pair complex (GIP) in the excited singlet state (S₁) is formed due to the ET encounter between the present donor TH2N or 2MTHN and TCNQ and this GIP complex rapidly dissociates into stable excited radical ions, as evidenced from steady state spectra. In polar DMF solvents, TCNQ exhibits an electronic absorption band of its anion without the presence of donor molecules. Both steady state and time-resolved data indicate that ET reactions between the present donors and acceptor TCNQ are largely impeded in the less polar solvent tetrahydrofuran (THF). In the highly polar solvent ACN, ET reactions between the donors and acceptor TCNQ have been suggested to be of adiabatic or intermediate between adiabatic and non-adiabatic types, from the observation of radical ion species in the electronic excited state. For some bicyclic donors and TCNQ acceptor systems, large negative ΔG, which is a measure of the gap between locally excited and radical ion-pair states, shows reaction occurs in highly exothermic regions. Further observations of −ΔG>λ, nuclear reorganization energy parameters and the decrement of ET rate (k_ET) with increasing exothermicity (more negative ΔG values) suggest the ET reaction for the bicyclic donor—TCNQ acceptor systems studied in the present investigation might occur in the Marcus inverted region. The possibility of building up efficient photoconducting materials with the present donor acceptor systems is suggested.     

Highly efficient and selective epoxidation of alkenes by photochemical oxygenation sensitized by a ruthenium(II) porphyrin with water as both electron and oxygen donor

Visible light irradiation of a reaction mixture of carbonyl-coordinated tetra(2,4,6-trimethyl)phenylporphyrinatoruthenium(II) (Ru(II)TMP(CO)) as a photosensitizer, hexachloroplatinate(IV) as an electron acceptor, and an alkene in alkaline aqueous acetonitrile induces selective epoxidation of the alkene with high quantum yield (Phi = 0.6, selectivity = 94.4% for cyclohexene and Phi = 0.4, selectivity = 99.7% for norbornene) under degassed conditions. The oxygen atom of the epoxide was confirmed to come from a water molecule by an experiment with H(2)(18)O. cis-Stilbene was converted into its epoxide, cis-stilbeneoxide, without forming trans-stilbeneoxide. trans-Stilbene, however, did not exhibit any reactivity. Under neutral conditions, an efficient buildup of the cation radical of Ru(II)TMP(CO) was observed at the early stage of the photoreaction, while an addition of hydroxide ion caused a rapid reaction with the cation radical to promote the reaction with reversion to the starting Ru(II)TMP(CO). A possible involvement of a higher oxidized state of Ru such as Ru(IV), Ru(V), Ru(VI) through a dismutation of the Ru(III) species was excluded by an experiment with Ru(VI)TMP(O)(2). Decarbonylation of the Ru complex was also proven to be invalid. A reaction mechanism involving an electron transfer from the excited triplet state of Ru(II)TMP(CO) to hexachloroplatinate(IV) and subsequent formation of OH(-)-coordinated Ru(III) species, leading to an oxo-ruthenium complex as the key intermediate of the photochemical epoxidation, was postulated.     

Lanthanide(III) Bis(phthalocyaninato)–[60]Fullerene Dyads: Synthesis,Characterization, and Photophysical Properties

A novel series of double‐decker lanthanide(III) bis(phthalocyaninato)–C₆₀ dyads [Ln^III(Pc)(Pc′)]–C₆₀ (M=Sm, Eu, Lu; Pc=phthalocyanine) ( 1 a – c ) have been synthesized from unsymmetrically functionalized heteroleptic sandwich complexes [Ln^III(Pc)(Pc′)] (Ln=Sm, Eu, Lu) 3 a – c and fulleropyrrolidine carboxylic acid 2 . The sandwich complexes 3 a – c were obtained by means of a stepwise procedure from unsymmetrically substituted free‐base phthalocyanine 5 , which was first transformed into the monophthalocyaninato intermediate [Ln^III(acac)(Pc)] and further reacted with 1,2‐dicyanobenzene in the presence of 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene (DBU). ¹H NMR spectra of the bis(phthalocyaninato) complexes 3 a – c and dyads 1 a – c were obtained by adding hydrazine hydrate to solutions of the complexes in [D₇]DMF, a treatment that converts the free radical double‐deckers into the protonated species, that is, [Ln^III(Pc)(Pc′)H] and [Ln^III(Pc)(Pc′)H]–C₆₀. The electronic absorption spectra of 3 a – c and 1 a – c in THF exhibit typical transitions of free‐radical sandwich complexes. In the case of dyads 1 a – c , the spectra display the absorption bands of both constituents, but no evidence of ground‐state interactions could be appreciated. When the UV/Vis spectra of 3 a – c and 1 a – c were recorded in DMF, typical features of the reduced forms were observed. Cyclic voltammetry studies for 3 a – c and 1 a – c were performed in THF. The electrochemical behavior of dyads 1 a – c is almost the exact sum of the behavior of the components, namely the double‐decker [Ln^III(Pc)(Pc′)] and the C₆₀ fullerene, thus confirming the lack of ground‐state interactions between the electroactive units. Photophysical studies on dyads 1 a – c indicate that only after irradiation at 387 nm, which excites both C₆₀ and [Ln^III(Pc)(Pc′)] components, a photoinduced electron transfer from the [Ln^III(Pc)(Pc′)] to C₆₀ occurs.     

Primary and secondary phosphine complexes of iron porphyrins and ruthenium phthalocyanine: synthesis, structure, and P-H bond functionalization

Reduction of [Fe(III)(Por)Cl] (Por = porphyrinato dianion) with Na2S2O4 followed by reaction with excess PH2Ph, PH2Ad, or PHPh2 afforded [Fe(II)(F20-TPP)(PH2Ph)2] (1a), [Fe(II)(F20-TPP)(PH2Ad)2] (1b), [Fe(II)(F20-TPP)(PHPh2)2] (2a), and [Fe(II)(2,6-Cl2TPP)(PHPh2)2] (2b). Reaction of [Ru(II)(Pc)(DMSO)2] (Pc = phthalocyaninato dianion) with PH2Ph or PHPh2 gave [Ru(II)(Pc)(PH2Ph)2] (3a) and [Ru(II)(Pc)(PHPh2)2] (4). [Ru(II)(Pc)(PH2Ad)2] (3b) and [Ru(II)(Pc)(PH2Bu(t))2] (3c) were isolated by treating a mixture of [Ru(II)(Pc)(DMSO)2] and O=PCl2Ad or PCl2Bu(t) with LiAlH4. Hydrophosphination of CH2=CHR (R = CO2Et, CN) with [Ru(II)(F20-TPP)(PH2Ph)2] or [Ru(II)(F20-TPP)(PHPh2)2] in the presence of (t)BuOK led to the isolation of [Ru(II)(F20-TPP)(P(CH2CH2R)2Ph)2] (R = CO2Et, 5a; CN, 5b) and [Ru(II)(F20-TPP)(P(CH2CH2R)Ph2)2] (R = CO2Et, 6a; CN, 6b). Similar reaction of 3a with CH2=CHCN or MeI gave [Ru(II)(Pc)(P(CH2CH2CN)2Ph)2] (7) or [Ru(II)(Pc)(PMe2Ph)2] (8). The reactions of 4 with CH2=CHR (R = CO2Et, CN, C(O)Me, P(O)(OEt)2, S(O)2Ph), CH2=C(Me)CO2Me, CH(CO2Me)=CHCO2Me, MeI, BnCl, and RBr (R = (n)Bu, CH2=CHCH2, MeC[triple bond]CCH2, HC[triple bond]CCH2) in the presence of (t)BuOK afforded [Ru(II)(Pc)(P(CH2CH2R)Ph2)2] (R = CO2Et, 9a; CN, 9b; C(O)Me, 9c; P(O)(OEt)2, 9d; S(O)2Ph, 9e), [Ru(II)(Pc)(P(CH2CH(Me)CO2Me)Ph2)2] (9f), [Ru(II)(Pc)(P(CH(CO2Me)CH2CO2Me)Ph2)2] (9g), and [Ru(II)(Pc)(PRPh2)2] (R = Me, 10a; Bu(n), 10b; Bn, 10c; CH2CH=CH2, 10d; CH2C[triple bond]CMe, 10e; CH=C=CH2, 10f). X-ray crystal structure determinations revealed Fe-P distances of 2.2597(9) (1a) and 2.309(2) A (2bx 2 CH2Cl2) and Ru-P distances of 2.3707(13) (3b), 2.373(2) (3c), 2.3478(11) (4), and 2.3754(10) A (5b x 2 CH2Cl2). Both the crystal structures of 3b and 4 feature intermolecular C-H...pi interactions, which link the molecules into 3D and 2D networks, respectively.     

Theoretical investigation of charge transfer excitation and charge recombination in acenaphthylene–tetracyanoethylene complex

Ab initio calculations were performed to investigate the charge separation and charge recombination processes in the photoinduced electron transfer reaction between tetracyanoethylene and acenaphthylene. The excited states of the charge‐balanced electron donor–acceptor complex and the singlet state of ion pair complex were studied by employing configuration interaction singles method. The equilibrium geometry of electron donor–acceptor complex was obtained by the second‐order Møller–Plesset method, with the interaction energy corrected by the counterpoise method. The theoretical study of ground state and excited states of electron donor–acceptor complex in this work reveals that the S₁ and S₂ states of the electron donor–acceptor complexes are excited charge transfer states, and charge transfer absorptions that corresponds to the S₀ → S₁ and S₀ → S₂ transitions arise from π–π* excitations. The charge recombination in the ion pair complex will produce the charge‐balanced ground state or excited triplet state. According to the generalized Mulliken–Hush model, the electron coupling matrix elements of the charge separation process and the charge recombination process were obtained. Based on the continuum model, charge transfer absorption and charge transfer emission in the polar solvent of 1,2‐dichloroethane were investigated. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem 94: 23–35, 2003     

Synthesis of nonanuclear heterometallic carbide clusters. Unexpected formation of the [Ru6(CO)16]2-[Pt2(CO)2(dppm)2]2+ ion pair on the way to [Ru6C(CO)16Pt3(dppm)2

A novel trimetallic cluster [Ru5CRh2Pt2(CO)16(dppm)2] was synthesized via coupling of two neutral clusters-[Ru5C(CO)15] and [Rh2Pt2(CO)6(dppm)2]. The structure of this mixed metal complex was established using X-ray crystallography and 31P NMR spectroscopy. It was found that the reaction between [Ru6C(CO)17] and [Pt2(CO)3(dppm)2] leads to spontaneous electron transfer between these polynuclear complexes and results in the formation of an unusually stable cluster "salt" {[Ru6(CO)16]2-[Pt2(CO)2(dppm)2]2+}, which was characterized by crystallographic and spectroscopic methods. Heating of the Ru6-Pt2 ion pair in an autoclave (145 degrees C, 15 atm N2) results in fusion of the metal frameworks to give a nonanuclear mixed metal [Ru6C(CO)16Pt3(dppm)2] cluster in a good yield. The latter complex was obtained earlier as a minor product of another thermal reaction and now has been additionally characterized by 31P NMR spectroscopy.