Reaction of hydrogen atoms with dimethyldisulfide

Hydrogen atoms, generated by the mercury (³P₁) sensitization of H₂, were allowed to react with dimethyldisulfide in the temperature range of 25–155°C. The only retrievable product is methanethiol, formed in the primary metathetical reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm H} + {\rm CH}_3 {\rm SSCH}_3 {\rm CH}_3 {\rm SH} + {\rm CH}_3 {\rm S} $\end{document}. The intermediacy of thiyl radicals was clearly demonstrated in experiments carried out in the presence of ethylene where one of the major products detected was ethyl methyl sulfide, formed via CH₃S + C₂H₅ → CH₃SC₂H₅. The major fate of the CH₃S radical is recombination and disproportionation, and the yield of methanethiol formed via disproportionation contributes less than 5% to the total thiol yield. The rate coefficient of step 1, from competition with the reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm H} + {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 4} {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_5 $\end{document}, is k₁ = (5.7 ± 1.2) × 10¹² exp[? (100 ± 100)/RT] cm³/mol sec.     

The gas-phase pyrolysis of alkyl nitrites. IV. Ethyl nitrite

The rate of decomposition of methyl nitrite (MN) has been studied in the presence of isobutane-t-BuH-(167-200°C) and NO (170-200°C). In the presence of t-BuH (～0.9 atm), for low concentrations of MN (～10^?4M) and small extents of reaction (4-10%), the first-order homogeneous rates of methanol (MeOH) formation are a direct measure of reaction (1) since k₄(t-BuH) »k₂(NO): . The results indicate that the termination process involves only \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ t - {\rm Bu\, and\, NO:\,\,}t - {\rm Bu} + {\rm NO\stackrel{e}{\longrightarrow}} $\end{document} products, such that k_e ～ 10¹⁰ M^?1 ～ sec^?1.Under these conditions small amounts of CH₂O are formed (3-8% of the MeOH). This is attributed to a molecular elimination of HNO from MN. The rate of MeOH formation shows a marked pressure dependence at low pressures of t-BuH. Addition of large amounts of NO completely suppresses MeOH formation. The rate constant for reaction (1) is given by k₁ = 10^{15.8°0.6-41.2°1}/· sec^?1. Since (E₁ + RT) and ΔH^Δ₁ are identical, within experimental error, both may be equated with D(MeO - NO) = 41.8 + 1 kcal/mole and E₂ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol. From ΔS¹₁ and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.1°0.6M^?1 · sec^?1, in good agreement with our values for other alkyl nitrites. These results reestablish NO as a good radical trap for the study of the reactions of alkoxyl radicals in particular. From an independent observation that k₆/k₂ = 0.17 independent of temperature, we conclude that \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ E_6 = 0 \pm 1{\rm kcal}/{\rm mol\, and\,}\,k_6 = 10^{9.3} M^{- 1} \cdot {\rm sec}^{- 1} :{\rm MeO} + {\rm NO}\stackrel{6}{\longrightarrow}{\rm CH}_2 {\rm O} + {\rm HNO} $\end{document}. From the independent observations that k₂:k_2→: k_6→ was 1:0.37:0.04, we find that k_2→ = 10^9.7M^?1 ? sec^?1 and k_6→ = 10^8.7M^?1 ? sec^?1. In addition, the thermodynamics lead to the result In the presence of NO (～0.9 atm) the products are CH₂O and N₂O (and presumably H₂O) such that the ratio N₂O/CH₂O ～ 0.5. The rate of CH₂O formation was affected by the surface-to-volume ratio s/v for different reaction vessels, but it is concluded that, in a spherical reaction vessel, the CH₂O arises as the result of an essentially homogeneous first-order, fourcenter elimination of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm HNO}:{\rm MN\stackrel{5}{\longrightarrow}CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm O} + {\rm HNO} $\end{document}. The rate of CH₂O formation is given by k₅ = 10^{13.6°0.6-38.5-1}/? sec^?1.     

Kinetics and mechanism of the silane decomposition

The homogeneous gas-phase decomposition kinetics of silane has been investigated using the single-pulse shock tube comparative rate technique (T = 1035–1184?K, P_total ≈? 4000 Torr). The initial reaction of the decomposition SiH₄ \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm SiH}_{\rm 4} \mathop \to \limits^1 {\rm SiH}_{\rm 2} + {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} SiH₂ + H₂ is a unimolecular process in its pressure fall-off regime with experimental Arrhenius parameters of logk₁ (sec^?1) = 13.33 ± 0.28–52,700 ± 1400/2.303RT. The decomposition has also been studied at lower temperatures by conventional methods. The results confirm the total pressure effect, indicate a small but not negligible extent of induced reaction, and show that the decomposition is first order in silane at constant total pressures. RRKM-pressure fall-off calculations for four different transition-state models are reported, and good agreement with all the data is obtained with a model whose high-pressure parameters are logA₁ (sec^?1) = 15.5, E_1(∞) = 56.9 kcal, and ΔE^0±₀(1) = 55.9 kcal. The mechanism of the decomposition is discussed, and it is concluded that hydrogen atoms are not involved. It is further suggested that silylene in the pure silane pyrolysis ultimately reacts with itself to give hydrogen: 2SiH₂ → (Si₂H₄)* → (SiH₃SiH)* → Si₂H₂ + H₂. The mechanism of H ? D exchange absorbed in the pyrolysis of SiD₄-hydrocarbon systems is also discussed.     

Methyl thiirane: Kinetic gas-phase titration of sulfur atoms in SX OY systems

The reaction SO + SO →l S + SO₂(2) was studied in the gas phase by using methyl thiirane as a titrant for sulfur atoms. By monitoring the C₃H₆ produced in the reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm S} + {\rm CH}_3\hbox{---} \overline {{\rm CH\hbox{---}CH}_2\hbox{---} {\rm S}} \to {\rm S}_2 + {\rm C}_3 {\rm H}_6 (7) $\end{document}, we determined that k₂ ? 3.5 × 10^?15 cm³/s at 298 K.     

Thermal decomposition of propane in shock waves

The thermal decomposition of propane was studied behind reflected shock waves over the temperature range 1100–1450 K and the pressure range 1.5–2.6 atm, by both monitoring the time variations of absorption at 3.39 μm and analyzing the concentrations of the reacted gas mixtures. The rate constants of the elementary reactions were discussed from the results. The rate constant expressions, k₁ = 1.1 × 10¹⁶ exp (?84 kcal/RT) s^?1 and k₄ = 9.3 × 10¹³ exp(?8 kcal/RT) cm³ mol^?1 s^?1, of reactions C₃H₈ → CH₃ + C₂H₅ and C₃H₈ + H → n-C₃H₇ + H₂ were evaluated, respectively.     

The gas-phase pyrolysis of alkyl nitrites. III. Isopropyl nitrite

The rate of decomposition of isopropyl nitrite (IPN) has been studied in a static system over the temperature range of 130–160°C. For low concentrations of IPN (1–5 × 10^?5M), but with a high total pressure of CF₄ (～0.9 atm) and small extents of reaction (～1%), the first-order rates of acetaldehyde (AcH) formation are a direct measure of reaction (1), since k₃ » k₂(NO): \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm IPN}\begin{array}{rcl} 1 \\ {\rightleftarrows} \\ 2 \\ \end{array}i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + {\rm NO},i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. \stackrel{3}{\longrightarrow} {\rm AcH} + {\rm Me}. $\end{document} Addition of large amounts of NO (～0.9 atm) in place of CF₄ almost completely suppressed AcH formation. Addition of large amounts of isobutane – t-BuH – (～0.9 atm) in place of CF₄ at 160°C resulted in decreasing the AcH by 25%. Thus 25% of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} $\end{document} were trapped by the t-BuH (4): \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + t - {\rm BuH} \stackrel{4}{\longrightarrow} i - \Pr {\rm OH} + (t - {\rm Bu}). $\end{document} The result of adding either NO or t-BuH shows that reaction (1) is the only route for the production of AcH. The rate constant for reaction (1) is given by k₁ = 10^{16.2±0.4–41.0±0.8}/θ sec^?1. Since (E₁ + RT) and ΔH°₁ are identical, within experimental error, both may be equated with D(i-PrO-NO) = 41.6 ± 0.8 kcal/mol and E₂ = 0 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. The thermochemistry leads to the result that \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \Delta H_f^\circ (i - {\rm Pr}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} ) = - 11.9 \pm 0.8{\rm kcal}/{\rm mol}. $\end{document} From ΔS°₁ and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.5±0.4M^?1·sec^?1. From an independent observation that k₆/k₂ = 0.19 ± 0.03 independent of temperature we find E₆ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol and k₆ = 10^9.8+0.4M^?;1·sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + {\rm NO} \stackrel{6}{\longrightarrow} {\rm M}_2 {\rm K} + {\rm HNO}. $\end{document} In addition to AcH, acetone (M₂K) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) are produced in approximately equal amounts. The rate of M₂K formation is markedly affected by the ratio S/V of different reaction vessels. It is concluded that the M₂K arises as the result of a heterogeneous elimination of HNO from IPN. In a spherical reaction vessel the first-order rate of M₂K formation is given by k₅ = 10^9.4–27.0/θ sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm IPN} \stackrel{5}{\longrightarrow} {\rm M}_2 {\rm K} + {\rm HNO}. $\end{document} IPA is thought to arise via the hydrolysis of IPN, the water being formed from HNO. This elimination process explains previous erroneous results for IPN.     

Kinetics of the reactions of the IO radical with dimethyl sulfide,methanethiol, ethylene,and propylene

The reactions of IO radicals with CH₃SCH₃, CH₃SH, C₂H₄, and C₃H₆ have been studied using the discharge flow method with direct detection of IO radicals by mass spectrometry. The absolute rate constants obtained at 298 K are the following: IO + CH₃SCH₃ → products (1): k₁ = (1.5 ± 0.2) × 10^?14; IO + CH₃SH → products (2): k₂ = (6.6 ± 1.3) × 10^?16; IO + C₂H₄ →products (3): k₃ < 2 × 10^?16; IO + C₃H₆ → products (4): k₄ < 2 × 10^?16 (units are cm³ molecule^?1 s^?1). CH₃S(O)CH₃ and HOI were found as products of reactions (1) and (2), respectively. The present lower value of k₁ compared to our previous determination is discussed.     

Three new isomers of [C2H6O]+˙: The radical cations [CH3O(H)CH2]+˙, [CH3CHOH2]+˙ and a low-energy isomer of unassigned structure

Three new [C₂H₆O]⁺˙ ions have been generated in the gas phase by appropriate dissociative ionizations and characterized by means of their metastable and collisionally induced fragmentations. The heats of formation, ΔH_f⁰, of the two ions which were assigned the structures [CH₃O(H)CH₂]⁺˙ and [CH₃CHOH₂]⁺˙ could not be measured. The third isomer, to which the structure \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H} \cdot \cdot \cdot \mathop {\rm H}\limits^ + \cdot \cdot \cdot {\rm OH}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} is tentatively assigned, was measured to have ΔH_f⁰ = 732±5 kJ mol^?1, making it the [C₂H₆O]⁺˙ isomer of lowest experimental heat of formation. It was found that the exothermic ion–radical recombinations [CH₂OH]⁺+CH₃˙→[CH₃O(H)CH₂]⁺˙ and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm HOH + H}^{\rm .} $\end{document}→[CH₃CHOH₂]⁺˙ have large energy barriers, 1.4 and ?0.9 eV, respectively, whereas the recombinations yielding [CH₃CH₂OH]⁺˙ have little or none.     

Rate constants of the reaction of ozone with trans-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride in air

Kinetic studies on reactions of ozone with trans-1,2-dichloroethene (DCE) and vinyl chloride (VC) were performed in air. In the presence of scavengers of radicals, such as CH₃CHO, the rates for both reactions are second order (first order in each reactant). Observed rate constants are (1.80 ± 0.29) X 10^?19 cm³/molecule·s for DCE and (2.45 ± 0.45) × 10^?19 cm³/molecule·s for VC. In the presence of CH₃CHO, propene ozonide \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ ({\rm CH}_3 \overline {{\rm CHOOCH}_2 {\rm O}}) $\end{document} was observed as a product in the case of VC. Peroxyformic acid (HC)O(OOH) was detected in both reactions. The Criegee mechanism was proposed to play a major role in the reaction of ozone with chloroolefins. The branching ratio of O₃ + CH₂=CHCl → CH₂OO + HCOCl (6a), CHClOO + HCHO (6b) was obtained as 76:24, and the fraction of the stabilized CH₂OO was estimated to be 0.25 of that produced in reaction (6a).     

Quenching rate constants for the removal of SO2(3B1) by various fluorinated olefins

A competitive technique employing the SO₂(³B₁) photosensitized isomerization of cis-C₂F₂H₂ to trans-C₂F₂H₂ in the presence of selected fluorinated olefins has been used at 3712 Å and 22°C to determine the quenching rate constants of the reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm SO}_{\rm 2} ({}^3B_1){\rm M}\mathop \to \limits^{k_{_4}}$\end{document} removal. With P_So2 = 25.4 torr and P_cis-C₂F₂H₂ = 0.239 torr Stern–Volmer plots for M = C₂H₄, C₂H₂F, 1,1-C₂F₂H₂, C₂F₄, and C₃F₆ yielded k₄ (units of 10¹⁰ l./mole · sec) values of 5.29 ± 0.16, 4.21 ± 0.53, 1.92 ± 0.23, 0.575 ± 0.060, and 0.0335 ± 0.0027, respectively. The results were consistent with the ability of an olefin to quench SO₂(³B₁) being inversely proportional to the polarizability of the olefin's π bond and the effect can be clearly noted as each H atom in C₂H₄ is individually replaced by an F atom.     

Kinetics of C6H5 radical reactions with 2‐methylpropane, 2,3‐dimethylbutane and 2,3,4‐trimethylpentane

The absolute bimolecular rate constants for the reactions of C₆H₅ with 2‐methylpropane, 2,3‐dimethylbutane and 2,3,4‐trimethylpentane have been measured by cavity ringdown spectrometry at temperatures between 290 and 500 K. For 2‐methylpropane, additional measurements were performed with the pulsed laser photolysis/mass spectrometry, extending the temperature range to 972 K. The reactions were found to be dominated by the abstraction of a tertiary C H bond from the molecular reactant, resulting in the production of a tertiary alkyl radical: C₆H₅ + CH(CH₃)₃ → C₆H₆ + t‐C₄H₉ (1) (1) C₆H₅ + (CH₃)₂CHCH(CH₃)₂ → C₆H₆ + t‐C₆H₁₃ (2) (2) C₆H₅ + (CH₃)₂CHCH(CH₃)CH(CH₃)₂ → C₆H₆ + t‐C₈H₁₇ (3) (3) with the following rate constants given in units of cm³ mol⁻¹ s⁻¹: k₁ = 10^{(11.45 ± 0.18)} e^{−(1512 ± 44)/T} k₂ = 10^{(11.72 ± 0.15)} e^{−(1007 ± 124)/T} k₃ = 10^{(11.83 ± 0.13)} e^{−(428 ± 108)/T} © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 31: 645–653, 1999     

Structure and formation of gaseous [C4H5O]+ Ions. II–Ions of the type HCC?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}(OH)(CH3)

Loss of an alkyl group X? from acetylenic alcohols HC?C? CX(OH)(CH₃) and gas phase protonation of HC?C? CO? CH₃ are both shown to yield stable HC?C? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}(OH)(CH₃) ions. Ions of this structure are unique among all other [C₄H₅O]⁺ isomers by having m/z 43 [C₂H₃O]⁺ as base peak in both the metastable ion and collisional activation spectra. It is concluded that the composite metastable peak for formation of m/z 43 corresponds to two distinct reaction profiles which lead to the same product ion, CH₃\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}?O, and neutral, HC?CH. It is further shown that the [C₄H₅O]⁺ ions from related alcohols (like HC?C? CH(OH)(CH₃)) which have an α-H atom available for isomerization into energy rich allenyl type molecular ions, consist of a second stable structure, H₂C?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}? C(OH)?CH₂.     

Kinetics of the gas-phase reaction of acetone with iodine: Heat of formation and stabilization energy of the acetonyl radical

The kinetics of the gas-phase reaction CH₃COCH₃ + I₂ ? CH₃COCH₂I + HI have been measured spectrophotometrically in a static system over the temperature range 340–430°. The pressure of CH₃COCH₃ was varied from 15 to 330 torr and of I₂ from 4 to 48 torr, and the initial rate of the reaction was found to be consistent with \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_3 {\rm COCH}_3 + {\rm I}^{\rm .} \stackrel{1}{\rightarrow}{\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm COCH} + {\rm HI} $\end{document} as the rate-determining step. An Arrhenius plot of the variation of k₁ with temperature showed considerable scatter of the points, depending on the conditioning of the reaction vessel. After allowance for surface catalysis, the best line drawn by inspection yielded the Arrhenius equation, log [k₁/(M^?1 sec^?1)] = (11.2 ± 0.8) – (27.7 θ 2.3)/θ, where θ = 2.303 R T in kcal/mole. This activation energy yields an acetone C? H bond strength of 98 kcal/mole and δH (CH₃CO?H₂) radical = ?5.7 ± 2.6 kcal/mole. As the acetone bond strength is the same as the primary C? H bond strength in isopropyl alcohol, there is no resonance stabilization of the acetonyl radical due to delocalization of the radical site. By contrast, the isoelectronic allyl resonance energy is 10 kcal/mole, and reasons for the difference are discussed in terms of the π-bond energies of acetone and propene.     

The collisionally induced dissociation of allyl and 2-propenyl cations

Pure [CH₂CHCH₂]⁺ and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm{CH}}_{\rm{3}} \mathop {\rm{C}}\limits^{\rm{ + }} = {\rm{CH}}_{\rm{2}} $\end{document} ions are generated only in metastable fragmentations of [CH₂?CHCH₂X]⁺˙, X=Cl, Br, I, and [CH₃CX?CH₂]⁺˙, X=Br, I, respectively. For ion source generated [C₃H₅]⁺ ions there is some structural interconversion. The structure characteristic feature of their collisional activation mass spectra is the ratio m/z 27 ([C₂H₃]⁺): m/z 26 ([C₂H₂]⁺˙). For \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm{CH}}_{\rm{3}} \mathop {\rm{C}}\limits^{\rm{ + }} = {\rm{CH}}_{\rm{2}} $\end{document} the ratio is only weakly dependent upon the translational energy of the ion. For [CH₂CHCH₂]⁺, the ratio rises sharply as translational energy is reduced, from 0.9 at 8 kV to c. 3 at 1 kV. [CH₂CHCH₂]⁺ ions generated by charge reversal of [CH₂CHCH₂]^? show higher ratios, resulting from their lower average internal energy content. It must therefore be emphasized that [C₃H₅]⁺ ion structure assignments should only be made using reference data which apply to specific experimental conditions. [C₃H₅]⁺ daughter ion structures for a number of well-known fragmentations have been established. The heat of formation of the 2-propenyl cation was measured to be 969±5 kJ mol^?1. Labelling experiments show that at low internal energies, allyl cations do not undergo atom randomization in c. 1–2 μs; high internal energy ions of longer lifetime (c. 8 μs) show complete atom randomization. H^˙ atom loss from [¹³CH₃CH?CH₂]⁺˙ has been shown to generate [¹³CH₂CHCH₂]⁺ and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {}^{{\rm{13}}}{\rm{CH}}_{\rm{2}} \mathop {\rm{C}}\limits^{\rm{ + }} - {\rm{CH}}_{\rm{3}} $\end{document} without any skeletal rearrangement.     

Ozone–olefin reactions in the gas phase 1. Rate constants and activation energies

Reactions of ozone with simple olefins have been studied between 6 and 800 mtorr total pressure in a 220-m³ reactor. Rate constants for the removal of ozone by an excess of olefin in the presence of 150 mtorr oxygen were determined over the temperature range 280 to 360° K by continuous optical absorption measurements at 2537 Å. The technique was tested by measuring the rate constants k₁ and k₂ of the reactions (1) NO + O₃ → NO₂ + O₂ and (2) NO₂ + O₃ rarr; NO₃ + O₂ which are known from the literature. The results for NO, NO₂, C₂H₄, C₃H₆, 2-butene (mixture of the isomers), 1,3→butadiene, isobutene, and 1,1 -difluoro-ethylene are 1.7 × 10^{?1 4} (290°K), 3.24 × 10^?17 (289°K), 1.2 × 10^{?1 4} exp (–4.95 ± 0.20/RT), 1.1 × 10^{?1 4} exp (–3.91 ± 0.20/RT), 0.94 × 10^{?1 4} exp ( –2.28 ± 0.15/RT), 5.45 ± 10^{?1 4} exp ( –5.33 ± 0.20/RT), 1.8 ×10^?17 (283°K), and 8 × 10^?20 cm³/molecule ·s(290°K). Productformation from the ozone–propylene reaction was studied by a mass spectrometric technique. The stoichiometry of the reaction is near unity in the presence of molecular oxygen.     

Thermal decomposition of 1-butyne in shock waves

1-Butyne diluted with Ar was heated behind reflected shock waves over the temperature range of 1100–1600 K and the total density range of 1.36 × 10^?5?1.75 × 10^?5 mol/cm³. Reaction products were analyzed by gas-chromatography. The progress of the reaction was followed by IR laser kinetic absorption spectroscopy. The products were CH₄, C₂H₂, C₂H₄, C₂H₆, allene, propyne, C₄H₂, vinylacetyiene, 1,2- butadiene, 1,3-butadiene, and benzene. The present data were successfully modeled with a 80 reaction mechanism. 1-Butyne was found to isomerize to 1,2-butadiene. The initial decomposition was dominated by 1-butyne → C₃H₃ + CH₃ under these conditions. Rate constant expressions were derived for the decomposition to be k₇ = 3.0 × 10¹⁵ exp(?75800 cal/RT) s^?1 and for the isomerization to be k₄ = 2.5 × 10¹³ exp(?65000 cal/RT) s^?1. The activation energy 75.8 kcal/mol was cited from literature value and the activation energy 65 kcal/mol was assumed. These rate constant expressions are applicable under the present experimental conditions, 1100–1600 K and 1.23–2.30 atm. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Kinetics of methoxy-NNO-Azoxymethane hydrolysis in strong acids

The kinetics of methoxy-NNO-azoxymethane (I) hydrolysis in concentrated solutions of strong acids (HBr, HCl, HClO₄, and H₂SO₄) has been investigated by a manometric method. The gas evolution rate is described by the equation corresponding to two consecutive first-order reactions, with the rate constant of the second reaction considerably exceeding the rate constant of the first reaction, i.e., k ₂ {ie17-1} k ₁. The temperature dependences of k ₁ (s⁻¹) in 47.59% HBr in the temperature range from 60 to 90°C and in 64.16% H₂SO₄ between 80 and 130°C are described by Arrhenius equations with IogA= 12.7 ± 1.5 and 13.6 ± 1.4 and E _a = 115 ± 10 and 137 ± 10 kJ/mol, respectively. The parameters of the Arrhenius equation for the rate constant k ₂ for the reaction in 64.16% H₂SO₄ between 80 and 130°C are IogA= 9.1 ± 2.5 and E _a = 91 ± 18 kJ/mol. An analysis of the UV spectra of compound I in concentrated H₂SO₄ shows that I is a weak base $ (pK_{BH^ + } \approx - 6) $ (pK_{BH^ + } \approx - 6) . The rate-determining step of the hydrolysis of I is the attack of the nucleophile on the carbon atom of the MeO group of the protonated molecule of I. The resulting methyldiazene dioxide decomposes via a complicated mechanism to evolve N₂, NO, and N₂O. The pseudo-first-order rate constant k ₁ of the reaction at 80°C depends strongly on the acid concentration and on the type of nucleophile (Br⁻, Cl⁻, or H₂O). The relationship between k ₁ and the rate constant k of the bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reaction (S_N2) is given by the linear equation log$ [k_1 /(C_H + C_{Nu} )] = m^ \ne m*X_0 + \log (k/K_{BH^ + } ) $ [k_1 /(C_H + C_{Nu} )] = m^ \ne m*X_0 + \log (k/K_{BH^ + } ) , where $ C_{H^ + } $ C_{H^ + } and C _Nu are the concentrations of H+ and nucleophile, respectively; X ₀ is the excess acidity; and m ^≠ and m* are coefficients. The Swain-Scott equation log$ (k_{Nu} /k_{H_2 O} ) = ns $ (k_{Nu} /k_{H_2 O} ) = ns , where n is the nucleophilicity factor and s is the substrate constant (s = 0.72), is applicable to the rate constants k of the S_N2 reactions of the protonated molecule of I with Br⁻, Cl⁻, and H₂O.     

High temperature pyrolysis of methane in shock waves. Rates for dissociative recombination reactions of methyl radicals and for propyne formation reaction

The pyrolysis of 2% CH₄ and 5% CH₄ diluted with Ar was studied using both a single–pulse and time–resolved spectroscopic methods over the temperature range 1400–2200 K and pressure range 2.3–3.7 atm. The rate constant expressions for dissociative recombination reactions of methyl radicals, CH₃ + CH₃ → C₂H₅ + H and CH₃ + CH₃ → C₂H₄ + H₂, and for C₃H₄ formation reaction were investigated. The simulation results required considerably lower value than that reported for CH₃ + CH₃ → C₂H₄ + H₂. Propyne formation was interpreted well by reaction C₂H₂ + CH₃ → P-C₃H₄ + H with ?? = 6.2 × ¹⁰12 exp(?17 kcal/RT) ^cm3 mol^?1 s^?1.     

The gas-phase pyrolysis of alkyl nitrites. II. s-butyl nitrite

The rate of decomposition of s-butyl nitrite (SBN) has been studied in the absence (130–160°C) and presence (160–200°C) of NO. Under the former conditions, for low concentrations of SBN (6 × 10^?5 ? 10^?4M) and small extents of reaction (～1.5%), the first-order homogeneous rates of acetaldehyde (AcH) formation are a direct measure of reaction (1) since k_3c » k₂(NO): . Unlike t-butyl nitrite (TBN), d(AcH)/dt is independent of added CF₄ (～0.9 atm). Thus k_3c is always » k₂ (NO) over this pressure range. Large amounts of NO (～0.9 atm) (130–160°C) completely suppress AcH formation. k₁ = 10^16.2–40.9/θ sec^?1. Since (E₁ + RT) and ΔH°₁ are identical, within experimental error, both may be equated with D(s-BuO-NO) = 41.5 ± 0.8 kcal/mol and E₂ = 0 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. The thermochemistry leads to the result ΔH°_f (s-\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document}) = ? 16.6 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. From ΔS°₁ and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.4 M^?1 · sec^?1, identical to that for TBN. From an independent observation that k₆/k₂ = 0.26 ± 0.01 independent of temperature, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm s - Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} + {\rm NO}\mathop \to \limits^{\rm 6} {\rm MEK} + {\rm HNO}$\end{document}, we find E₆ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol and k₆ = 10^9.8M^?1 · sec^?1. Under the conditions first cited, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) is also a product of the reaction, the rate of which becomes measurable at extents of conversion >2%. However, this rate is ～0.1 that of AcH formation. Although MEK formation is affected by the ratio S/V for different reaction vessels, in a spherical reaction vessel, this MEK arises as the result of an essentially homogeneous first-order 4-centre elimination of HNO. \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm SBN}\mathop \to \limits^{\rm 5} {\rm MEK} + {\rm HNO}$\end{document}; k₅ = 10^12.8–35.8/θ sec^?1. Sec-butyl alcohol (SBA), formed at a rate comparable to MEK, is thought to arise via the hydrolysis of SBN, the water being formed from HNO. The rate of disappearance of SBN, that is, d(MEK + SBA + AcH)/dt, is given by k_global = 10^15.7–39.6/θ sec^?1. In NO (～1 atm) the rate of formation of MEK was about twice that in the absence of NO, whereas the SBA was greatly reduced. This reaction was also affected by the ratio S/V of different reaction vessels. It was again concluded that in a spherical reaction vessel, the rate of MEK formation was essentially homogeneous and first order. This rate is given by k_obs = 10^12.9–35.4/θ sec^?1, very similar to k₅. However, although it is clear that the rate of formation of MEK is doubled in the presence of NO, the value for k_obs makes it difficult to associate this extra MEK with the disproportionation of s-\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document} and NO: s-\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$s{\rm - Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} + {\rm NO}\mathop \to \limits^{\rm 6} {\rm MEK} + {\rm HNO}$\end{document}. NO at temperatures of 130–160°C completely suppresses AcH formation. AcH reappears at higher temperatures (165–200°C), enabling k_3c to be determined. Ignoring reaction (6), d(AcH)/dt = k₁k₃ (SBN )/[k_3c + k₂(NO)]; k_3c = 10^14.8–15.3/θ sec^?1. Inclusion of reaction (6) into the mechanism makes very little difference to the result. Reaction (3c) is expected to be a pressure-dependent process.     

Reactions of alkoxy radicals with O2. I. C2H5O radicals

C₂H₅ONO was photolyzed with 366 nm radiation at ?48, ?22, ?2.5, 23, 55, 88, and 120°C in a static system in the presence of NO, O₂, and N₂. The quantum yield of CH₃CHO, Φ{CH₃CHO}, was measured as a function of reaction conditions. The primary photochemical act is and it proceeds with a quantum yield ?_1a = 0.29 ± 0.03 independent of temperature. The C₂H₅O radicals can react with NO by two routes The C₂H₅O radical can also react with O₂ via Values of k₆/k₂ were determined at each temperature. They fit the Arrhenius expression: Log(k₆/k₂) = ?2.17 ± 0.14 ? (924 ± 94)/2.303 T. For k₂ ? 4.4 × 10^?11 cm³/s, k₆ becomes (3.0 ± 1.0) × 10^?13 exp{?(924 ± 94)/T} cm³/s. The reaction scheme also provides k_8a/k₈ = 0.43 ± 0.13, where