Initiator efficiency of 2,2′‐azobis(isobutyronitrile) in bulk dodecyl acrylate free‐radical polymerizations over a wide conversion and molecular weight range

An Erratum has been published for this article in J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. (2004) 42(21) 5559 . The initiator efficiency, f, of 2,2′‐azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) in dodecyl acrylate (DA) bulk free‐radical polymerizations has been determined over a wide range of monomer conversion in high‐molecular‐weight regimes (M_n ? 10⁶ g mol^?1 [? 4160 units of DA)] with time‐dependent conversion data obtained via online Fourier transform near infrared spectroscopy (FTNIR) at 60 °C. In addition, the required initiator decomposition rate coefficient, k_d, was determined via online UV spectrometry and was found to be 8.4 · 10^?6 s^?1 (±0.5 · 10^?6 s^?1) in dodecane, n‐butyl acetate, and n‐dodecyl acetate at 60 °C. The initiator efficiency at low monomer conversions is relatively low (f = 0.13) and decreases with increasing monomer to polymer conversions. The evolution of f with monomer conversion (in high‐molecular‐weight regimes), x, at 60 °C can be summarized by the following functionality: f^{60 °C} (x) = 0.13–0.22 · x + 0.25 · x² (for x ≤ 0.45). The reported efficiency data are believed to have an error of >50%. The ratio of the initiator efficiency and the average termination rate coefficient, 〈k_t±, (f/〈k_t〉) has been determined at various molecular weights for the generated polydodecyl acrylate (M_n = 1900 g mol^?1 (? 8 units of DA) up to M_n = 36,500 g mol^?1 (? 152 units of DA). The (f/〈k_t〉) data may be indicative of a chain length‐dependent termination rate coefficient decreasing with (average) chain length. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 5170–5179, 2004     

Relevance of a prereaction for the in situ NMP of styrene using the C‐Phenyl‐N‐tert‐butylnitrone/2,2′‐azobis(isobutyronitrile) pair

In this article, we compare two routes for carrying out in situ nitroxide‐mediated polymerization of styrene using the C‐phenyl‐N‐tert‐butylnitrone (PBN)/2,2′‐azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) pair to identify the best one for an optimal control. One route consists in adding PBN to the radical polymerization of styrene, while the other approach deals with a prereaction between the nitrone and the free radical initiator prior to the addition of the monomer and the polymerization. The combination of ESR and kinetics studies allowed demonstrating that when the polymerization of styrene is initiated by AIBN in the presence of enough PBN at 110 °C, fast decomposition of AIBN is responsible for the accumulation of dead polymer chains at the early stages of the polymerization, in combination with controlled polystyrene chains. On the other hand, PBN acts as a terminating agent at 70 °C with the formation of a polystyrene end‐capped by an alkoxyamine, which is not labile at this temperature but that can be reactivated and chain‐extended by increasing the temperature. Finally, the radical polymerization of styrene is better controlled when the nitrone/initiator pair is prereacted at 85 °C for 4 h in toluene before styrene is added and polymerized at 110 °C. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 1085–1097, 2009     

8‐Hydroxy‐1,3,6‐pyrene trisulfonic acid (pyranine) bleaching by 2,2′‐azobis(2‐amidinopropane) derived peroxyl radicals

8‐Hydroxy‐1,3,6‐pyrene trisulfonic acid, trisodium salt (pyranine), readily reacts with peroxyl radicals generated in the aerobic pyrolysis of 2,2′‐azobis(2‐amidinopropane) (AAPH). The process can be followed by monitoring the decrease in pyranine absorbance (460 nm) or fluorescence (excitation: 460 nm; emission: 510 nm). The reaction follows a nearly zero‐order kinetics in pyranine (0.25–30 μM range), suggesting a very efficient trapping of peroxyl radicals. In agreement with this, the process is order one in AAPH. The bleaching process is totally prevented by Trolox (μM range), and partially prevented by Trp (mM range). The protection afforded by Trp is very little dependent upon the pyranine concentration. This result indicates that the main protective pathway is not a competitive scavenging of the peroxyl radicals. The data suggest protection due to repair of the initially produced pyranyl radicals. These radicals are also very efficient in the destruction of C‐phycocyanin bilin groups. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 35: 525–531, 2003     

Dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylate and bis(dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylato‐κ2N,N′)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate

The single‐crystal X‐ray structures of dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylate, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄, and the copper(I) coordination complex bis(dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylato‐κ²N,N′)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate, [Cu(C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄)₂]BF₄, are reported. The uncoordinated ligand crystallizes across an inversion centre and adopts the anticipated anti pyridyl arrangement with coplanar pyridyl rings. In contrast, upon coordination of copper(I), the ligand adopts an arrangement of pyridyl donors facilitating chelating metal coordination and an increased inter‐pyridyl twisting within each ligand. The distortion of each ligand contrasts with comparable copper(I) complexes of unfunctionalized 2,2′‐bipyridine.     

2,2′‐Bipyridinium bis(perchlorate)

The title compound, [H₂bipy](ClO₄)₂ or C₁₀H₁₀N₂²⁺·2ClO₄^?, was obtained at the interface between an organic (2,2′‐bi­pyridine in methanol) and an aqueous phase (perchloric acid in water). The compound crystallizes in space group P and comprises discrete diprotonated trans‐bipyridinium cations, [H₂bipy]²⁺, and ClO₄^? anions. The cations and anions are connected through N—H?O and C—H?O hydrogen bonds [distances N?O 2.817 (4) and 2.852 (4) Å, and C?O 3.225 (6)–3.412 (5)Å]. The C—C bond distance between the two rings is 1.452 (5) Å. The bipyridinium cation has a trans conformation and the N—C—C—N torsion angle is 152.0 (3)°.     

Synthesis and morphology of Fe3O4/polystyrene/poly(isopropylacrylamide‐co‐methyl acrylate acid) magnetic composite latex – 2,2′‐azobis (2‐methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride as initiator

In this work, Fe₃O₄/polystyrene/poly(N‐isopropylacryl amide‐co‐methylacrylate acid) (Fe₃O₄/PS/P(NIPAAM‐co‐MAA)) magnetic composite latex was synthesized by the method of two stage emulsion polymerization. In this reaction system, 2,2′‐azobis(2‐methyl propionamidine) dihydrochloride (AIBA) was used as initiator to initiate the first stage reaction and second stage reaction. The Fe₃O₄ particles were prepared by a traditional coprecipitation method. Fe₃O₄ particles were surface treated by either PAA oligomer or lauric acid to form the stable ferrofluid. The first stage for the synthesis of magnetic composite latex was to synthesize PS in the presence of ferrofluid by soapless emulsion polymerization to form the Fe₃O₄/PS composite latex particles. Following the first stage of reaction, the second stage of polymerization was carried out by the method of soapless emulsion polymerization with NIPAAM and MAA as monomers and Fe₃O₄/PS latex as seeds. The magnetic composite particles, Fe₃O₄/PS/P(NIPAAM‐co‐MAA), were thus obtained. The mechanism of the first stage reaction and second stage reaction were investigated. Moreover, the effects of PAA and lauric acid on the reaction kinetics, morphology, and particle size distribution were studied. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 3912–3921, 2007     

Synthesis,Coordination, and Spectroscopic Properties of 2,2′‐Bipyridyldimesitylpalladium(II) and 6‐Mesityl‐2,2′‐bipyridyldimesitylpalladium(II)

The synthetic route to the dimesitylpalladium(II) complex [(bpy)PdMes₂] ( 1 ) (Mes = mesityl = 2,4,6‐trimethyl phenyl) does not only give the desired compound but also the 6‐mesityl‐2,2′bipyridyldimesitylpalladium [(6‐Mes‐bpy)PdMes₂] ( 2 ) complex and the free ligand 6,6′‐dimesityl‐2,2′‐bipyridine in reasonable yields. Single crystals of 2 were examined by X‐Ray diffraction. The compound reveals a sterically crowded molecular structure. An intramolecular π‐stacking interaction was found between the mesityl substituent on the bipyridine ligand and the adjacent mesityl ligand. The electrochemical behaviour of 1 and 2 together with a related compound was examined at various temperatures showing two reversible reduction reactions and reversible one‐electron oxidation steps at low temperatures. The latter are assigned to Pd^II/Pd^III couples.     

cis‐Bis(2,2′‐bipyridyl‐N,N′)dichlorosilicon diiodide

The crystal and molecular structure of the title compound, C₂₀H₁₆Cl₂N₄Si²⁺·2I^?, has been determined at 173 K. To our knowledge, this is the first crystal structure of a silicon tetrahalide complex with a bidentate base as a ligand. The two chloro ligands are cis relative to each other. The Si—N bonds trans to a chloro ligand are longer than the Si—N bonds trans to an Si—N bond. This feature is observed for the majority of M(bipy)₂Cl₂ (M = metal and bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridyl) complexes, but it does not hold for all structures retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database. The two pyridyl rings of each bipyridyl unit are nearly coplanar, whereas the bipyridyl units are almost perpendicular to each other. The two I^? ions are more than 5 Å from the silicon centre. As a result, the compound can definitely be described as ionic. The crystal packing is stabilized by short C—H?I contacts.     

Dichloro(4,4′‐dinonyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ2N,N′)platinum(II)

The title compound, [PtCl₂(C₂₈H₄₄N₂)], is a new square‐planar Pt^II complex con­taining a bi­pyridine moiety with two long alkyl‐chain substituents. The complex forms a segregated packing structure made up of the alkyl‐chain layers and paired coordination sites.     

4,4′‐Bis(2,2,2‐trifluoroethoxymethyl)‐2,2′‐bipyridine

As part of a homologous series of novel polyfluorinated bipyridyl (bpy) ligands, the title compound, C₁₆H₁₄F₆N₂O₂, contains the smallest fluorinated group, viz. CF₃. The molecule resides on a crystallographic inversion centre at the mid‐point of the pyridine C_ipso—C_ipso bond. Therefore, the bpy skeleton lies in an anti conformation to avoid repulsion between the two pyridyl N atoms. Weak intramolecular C—H...N and C—H...O interactions are observed, similar to those in related polyfluorinated bpy–metal complexes. A π–π interaction is observed between the bpy rings of adjacent molecules and this is probably a primary driving force in crystallization. Weak intermolecular C—H...N hydrogen bonding is present between one of the CF₃CH₂– methylene H atoms and a pyridyl N atom related by translation along the [010] direction, in addition to weak benzyl‐type C—H...F interactions to atoms of the terminal CF₃ group. It is of note that the O—CH₂CF₃ bond is almost perpendicular to the bpy plane.     

Diorganotin(IV) compounds derived from n‐methyl‐2,2′‐diphenolamine and 2,2′‐diphenolamine

The reaction of N‐methyl‐2,2′‐diphenolamine 1 and 2,2′‐diphenolamine 2 with some diorganotin(IV) oxides [R1/2SnO: R¹ = Me, n‐Bu, t‐Bu and Ph] led to the syntheses of diorgano[N‐methyl‐2,2′‐diphenolato‐O,O′,N]tin (IV) 3–6 and diorgano[2,2′‐diphenolato‐O,O′,N]tin (IV) 7–9 . All compounds (except 7 ) studied in this work were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR, infrared, and mass spectroscopy. Their ¹¹⁹Sn NMR data show that the tin atom is tetracoordinated in CDCl₃ but penta and hexacoordinated in DMSO‐d₆. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 10: 133–139, 1999     

Cobalt(II) and cobalt(III) complexes with 4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine

4′‐Cyanophenyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (cptpy) was employed as an N,N′,N′′‐tridentate ligand to synthesize the compounds bis[4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]cobalt(II) bis(tetrafluoridoborate) nitromethane solvate, [Co^II(C₂₂H₁₄N₄)₂](BF₄)₂·CH₃NO₂, (I), and bis[4′‐(4‐cyanophenyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]cobalt(III) tris(tetrafluoridoborate) nitromethane sesquisolvate, [Co^III(C₂₂H₁₄N₄)₂](BF₄)₃·1.5CH₃NO₂, (II). In both complexes, the cobalt ions occupy a distorted octahedral geometry with two cptpy ligands in a meridional configuration. A greater distortion from octahedral geometry is observed in (I), which indicates a different steric consequence of the constrained ligand bite on the Co^II and Co^III ions. The crystal structure of (I) features an interlocked sheet motif, which differs from the one‐dimensional chain packing style present in (II). The lower dimensionality in (II) can be explained by the disturbance caused by the larger number of anions and solvent molecules involved in the crystal structure of (II). All atoms in (I) are on general positions, and the F atoms of one BF₄⁻ anion are disordered. In (II), one B atom is on an inversion center, necessitating disorder of the four attached F atoms, another B atom is on a twofold axis with ordered F atoms, and the C and N atoms of one nitromethane solvent molecule are on a twofold axis, causing disorder of the methyl H atoms. This relatively uncommon study of analogous Co^II and Co^III complexes provides a better understanding of the effects of different oxidation states on coordination geometry and crystal packing.     

A three‐dimensional framework in 2,2′‐biimidazolium bis(2,2′‐biimidazole‐κ2N,N′)bis(biphenyl‐2,4′‐dicarboxylato‐κO)manganese(II) hexahydrate

In the title salt, (C₆H₈N₄)[Mn(C₁₄H₈O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄)₂]·6H₂O, the Mn^II atom lies on an inversion centre and is coordinated by four N atoms from two 2,2′‐biimidazole (biim) ligands and two O atoms from two biphenyl‐2,4′‐dicarboxylate (bpdc) anions to give a slightly distorted octahedral coordination, while the cation lies about another inversion centre. Adjacent [Mn(bpdc)₂(biim)₂]²⁻ anions are linked via two pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds, leading to an infinite chain along the [100] direction. The protonated [H₂biim]²⁺ moiety acts as a charge‐compensating cation and space‐filling structural subunit. It bridges two [Mn(bpdc)₂(biim)₂]²⁻ anions through two pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds, constructing two R₂²(9) rings, leading to a zigzag chain in the [2] direction, which gives rise to a ruffled set of [H₂biim]²⁺[Mn(bpdc)₂(biim)₂]²⁻ moieties in the [01] plane. The water molecules give rise to a chain structure in which O—H...O hydrogen bonds generate a chain of alternating four‐ and six‐membered water–oxygen R₄²(8) and R₆⁶(12) rings, each lying about independent inversion centres giving rise to a chain along the [100] direction. Within the water chain, the (H₂O)₆ water rings are hydrogen bonded to two O atoms from two [Mn(bpdc)₂(biim)₂]²⁻ anions, giving rise to a three‐dimensional framework.     

1,1′‐Di(hydrazinocarbonylmethyl)‐2,2′‐biimidazole monohydrate and 1,1′‐di[2‐(hydrazinocarbonyl)ethyl]‐2,2′‐bi­imidazole

The crystal structures of the title compounds, alternatively called 2,2′‐(2,2′‐bi­imid­azole‐1,1′‐diyl)­diaceto­hydra­zide monohydrate, C₁₀H₁₄N₈O₂·H₂O, (I), and 3,3′‐(2,2′‐bi­imid­azole‐1,1′‐diyl)­dipropion­o­hydra­zide, C₁₂H₁₈N₈O₂, (II), respectively, have been determined. The mol­ecules consist of half‐mol­ecule asymmetric units related by a twofold rotation in (I) and by a center of inversion in (II). The imidazole rings of both mol­ecules crystallize in a nearly coplanar fashion [dihedral angles of 5.91 (3) and 0.0 (1)° for (I) and (II), respectively]. Both planar hy­dra­zinocarbonylalkyl substituents are essentially planar and assume the E orientation.     

Dichloro(2,2′‐diamino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thiazole‐N3,N3′)copper(II)

The title complex, [CuCl₂(C₆H₆N₄S₂)], has a flattened tetrahedral coordination. The Cu^II atom is located on a twofold rotation axis and is coordinated by two N atoms from a chelating 2,2′‐di­amino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thia­zole ligand and by two Cl atoms. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding exists between the amino groups of the 2,2′‐di­amino‐4,4′‐bi‐1,3‐thia­zole ligand and the Cl atoms. The intermolecular separation of 3.425 (1) Å between parallel bi­thia­zole rings suggests there is a π–π interaction between them.     

Tris(2,2′‐bioxazoline‐κ2N,N′)copper(II) diperchlorate and tris(2,2′‐bioxazoline‐κ2N,N′)­nickel(II) diperchlorate

In the two isomorphous title compounds, viz. tris­[2,2′‐bi(4,5‐di­hydro‐1,3‐oxazole)‐κ²N,N′]copper(II) diperchlorate, [Cu(C₆H₈N₂O₂)₃](ClO₄)₂, (I), and tris­[2,2′‐bi(4,5‐di­hydro‐1,3‐oxazole)‐κ²N,N′]­nickel(II) diperchlorate, [Ni(C₆H₈N₂O₂)₃](ClO₄)₂, (II), the M^II ions each have a distorted octahedral coordination geometry formed via six N atoms from three 2,2′‐bioxazoline ligands. For each ligand, the two five‐membered rings are nearly coplanar. It is noteworthy that the Jahn–Teller effect is stronger in (I) than in (II). The three‐dimensional supramolecular structures of (I) and (II) are formed via weak hydrogen‐bonding interactions between O atoms from per­chlorate anions and H atoms from 2,2′‐bioxazoline ligands.     

Tris(2,2′‐bipyridyl‐N,N′)­iron(II) diperchlorate

The title compound, [Fe(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃](ClO₄)₂, is isomorphous with the Zn^II and Ru^II analogues. A twofold axis passes through the metal atom and the midpoint of the C—C bond joining the two pyridine rings of one of the bi­pyridyl ligands.     

1,1′‐Di­acetyl‐3‐hydroxy‐2,2′,3,3′‐tetra­hydro‐3,3′‐bi(1H‐indole)‐2,2′‐dione

In the title compound, C₂₀H₁₆N₂O₅, both of the 1‐acetyl­isatin (1‐acetyl‐1H‐indole‐2,3‐dione) moieties are planar and form a dihedral angle of 74.1 (1)°. Weak intermolecular hydrogen bonds and C—H?π interactions stabilize the packing in the crystal.     

4,4′‐Bis(N,N‐diethyl­amino)‐2,2′‐bi­pyridine

The title compound, C₁₈H₂₆N₄, contains two almost identical independent mol­ecules that lie about inversion centres. Each mol­ecule has a planar bi­pyridine nucleus and two terminal diethyl­amine groups oriented at almost right angles to the core. These diethyl­amine branches act as spacers, producing a very open structure with one of the lowest densities reported among related compounds. The most important intermolecular interactions are of the C—H⋯π type, which connect non‐equivalent moieties.     

(R)‐(6,6′‐Dihydroxybiphenyl‐2,2′‐diyl)bis(diphenylphosphine oxide) methanol solvate

The title compound, C₃₆H₂₈O₄P₂·CH₄O, was synthesized directly from the methoxy analogue. The crystal structure shows that one OH group interacts with an O atom of a phosphine oxide group in an adjacent mol­ecule, while the other OH group complexes with the methanol solvent molecule via intermolecular hydrogen bonds. An O atom of one phosphine oxide group interacts with the hydroxy H atom of methanol via a hydrogen bond. There are intra‐ and intermolecular π–π interactions between the phenyl rings. All these interactions result in the formation of supramolecular chiral parallelogram channels via self‐assembly.