Investigating written expressions of mathematical reasoning for students with learning disabilities

Assessment results from two open-construction response mathematical tasks involving fractions and decimals were used to investigate written expression of mathematical reasoning for students with learning disabilities. The solutions and written responses of 51 students with learning disabilities in fourth and fifth grade were analyzed on four primary dimensions: (a) accuracy, (b) five elements of mathematical reasoning, (c) five elements of mathematical writing, and (d) vocabulary use. Results indicate most students were not accurate in their problem solution and communicated minimal mathematical reasoning in their written expression. In addition, students tended to use general vocabulary rather than academic precise math vocabulary and students who provided a visual representation were more likely to answer accurately. To further clarify the students struggles with mathematical reasoning, error analysis indicated a variety of error patterns existed and tended to vary widely by problem type. Our findings call for more instruction and intervention focused on supporting students mathematical reasoning through written expression. Implications for research and practice are presented.     

Computer Tools for Interactive Mathematical Activity in the Elementary School

The computer tools for interactive mathematical activity (TIMA) were designed to provide children a medium in which they could enact their mathematical operations of unitizing, uniting, fragmenting, segmenting, partitioning, replicating, iterating and measuring. As such, they are very different from the drill and practice or tutorial software that are prevalent in many elementary schools. The TIMA were developed in the context of a constructivist teaching experiment focused on children's construction of fractions. They were used to promote cognitive play that could be transformed into independent mathematical activity. Teaching interventions were often critical in bringing forth mathematical activity. Students' interactions were also important provocations for mathematical reasoning with the TIMA. The TIMA do not, by themselves define a microworld. Rather it is the children's activity and their interpretations of the results of that activity, while interacting with others, that bring forth a microworld of mathematical operations. Designers of computational environments for children need to take into account the contributions children need to make in order to build their own mathematical structures. For teachers to make effective use of software such as the TIMA they need to understand (and share) the views of learning that shaped the development of the software.This revised version was published online in September 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Characteristics of Second Graders' Mathematical Writing

This study compared the characteristics of second graders' mathematical writing between an intervention and comparison group. Two six‐week Project M2 units were implemented with students in the intervention group. The units position students to communicate in ways similar to mathematicians, including engaging in verbal discourse where they themselves make sense of the mathematics through discussion and debate, writing about their reasoning on an ongoing basis, and utilizing mathematical vocabulary while communicating in any medium. Students in the comparison group learned from the regular school curriculum. Students in both the intervention and comparison groups conveyed high and low levels of content knowledge as indicated in archived data from an open‐response end‐of‐the‐year assessment. A multivariate analysis of variance indicated several differences favoring the intervention group. Both the high‐ and low‐level intervention subgroups outperformed the comparison group in their ability to (a) provide reasoning, (b) attempt to use formal mathematical vocabulary, and (c) correctly use formal mathematical vocabulary in their writing. The low‐level intervention subgroup also outperformed the respective comparison subgroup in their use of (a) complete sentences and (b) linking words. There were no differences between groups in their attempt at writing and attempts at and usage of informal mathematical vocabulary.     

Leveraging Structure: Logical Necessity in the Context of Integer Arithmetic

Looking for, recognizing, and using underlying mathematical structure is an important aspect of mathematical reasoning. We explore the use of mathematical structure in children’s integer strategies by developing and exemplifying the construct of logical necessity. Students in our study used logical necessity to approach and use numbers in a formal, algebraic way, leveraging key mathematical ideas about inverses, the structure of our number system, and fundamental properties. We identified the use of carefully chosen comparisons as a key feature of logical necessity and documented three types of comparisons students made when solving integer tasks. We believe that logical necessity can be applied in various mathematical domains to support students to successfully engage with mathematical structure across the K–12 curriculum.     

Part-whole number knowledge in preschool children

Ability to reflect on a number as an object of thought, and to isolate its constituent parts, is basic to a deep knowledge of arithmetic, as well as much practical and applied mathematical problem solving. Part-whole reasoning and counting are closely related in children’s numerical development. The mathematical behavior of young children in part-whole problem settings was examined by using a dynamic problem situation, in which a small set of items was partitioned such that one of the subsets remained perceptually inaccessible. Issues addressed include the problem solving strategies successful children used, adaptations children make in response to successive administrations of the task over time, and characterizations of children’s mathematical thinking based on their responses to the task.     

A characterization of dynamic reasoning: Reasoning with time as parameter

Students incorporate and use the implicit and explicit parameter time to support their mathematical reasoning and deepen their understandings as they participate in a differential equations class during instruction on solutions to systems of differential equations. Therefore, dynamic reasoning is defined as developing and using conceptualizations about time as a parameter that implicitly or explicitly coordinates with other quantities to understand and solve problems. Students participate in the following types of mathematical activity related to dynamic reasoning: making time an explicit quantity, using the metaphor of time as “unidimensional space”, using time to reason both quantitatively and qualitatively, using three-dimensional visualization of time related functions, fusing context and representation of time related functions, and using the fictive motion metaphor for function. The purpose of this article is to present a characterization of dynamic reasoning and promote more explicit attention to this type of reasoning by teachers in K-16 mathematics in order to improve student understanding in time related areas of mathematics.     

Elements in accepting an explanation

This paper addresses the question of what criteria influenced the acceptance of two “explanations” by grade 5 students. The students accepted the use of deductive reasoning as explanatory, as well as using reasoning by analogy in their own explanations. The “explanations” can be interpreted as proofs by mathematical induction. The main weakness of mathematical induction as a form of explanation was the arbitrariness of the initial step. The induction step did not seem to trouble these students. Other elements in their acceptance of explanations were concreteness, familiarity, and opportunities for multiple interpretations.     

Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics

Empirical research shows that students often use reasoning founded on copying algorithms or recalling facts (imitative reasoning) when solving mathematical tasks. Research also indicate that a focus on this type of reasoning might weaken the students’ understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts. It is therefore important to study the types of reasoning students have to perform in order to solve exam tasks and pass exams. The purpose of this study is to examine what types of reasoning students taking introductory calculus courses are required to perform. Tasks from 16 exams produced at four different Swedish universities were analyzed and sorted into task classes. The analysis resulted in several examples of tasks demanding different types of mathematical reasoning. The results also show that about 70% of the tasks were solvable by imitative reasoning and that 15 of the exams could be passed using only imitative reasoning.     

Assessing Students' Mathematical Communication

Assessment of students' mathematical communication through the use of open-ended tasks and scoring procedures is addressed, as is the use of open-ended tasks to assess students' mathematical communication by providing students opportunities to display their mathematical thinking and reasoning. Also, two scoring procedures (quantitative holistic scoring procedure and qualitative analytic scoring procedure) are described for examining students' communication skills.     

The Interplay Between Gesture and Discourse as Mediating Devices in Collaborative Mathematical Reasoning:A Multimodal Approach

This article aims to identify the mathematical reasoning strategies expressed through gestures and speech used by two groups of sixth-grade pupils when solving a task related to the transition between two semiotic representations: figure and Cartesian diagram. The article also identifies the difficulties the pupils meet in the solution process. The analyses of the group dialogues focus particularly on the gesture dimension of deixis. The pupils in both groups have used the following deictic gestures: pointing, held-point, linear point-slide, and circular point-slide in their solution process, while repeated pointing has been identified only in one of the groups. These pointing gestures are related to the reasoning strategies: comparison of persons in the figure, coordination of two dimensions in the diagram, recapitulation and going to an extreme location. The pupils use the modalities of speech, gesture, and writing in order to solve the mathematical task. Their pointing gestures related to their use of reasoning strategies play a multifaceted role in developing collaborative mathematical reasoning in the two small groups.     

Mathematical Thinking Involved in U.S. and Chinese Students' Solving of Process-Constrained and Process-Open Problems

This study examined U.S. and Chinese 6th-grade students' mathematical thinking and reasoning involved in solving 6 process-constrained and 6 process-open problems. The Chinese sample (from Guiyang, Guizhou) had a significantly higher mean score than the U.S. sample (from Milwaukee, Wisconsin) on the process-constrained tasks, but the sample of U.S. students had a significantly higher mean score than the sample of the Chinese students on the process-open tasks. A qualitative analysis of students' responses was conducted to understand the mathematical thinking and reasoning involved in solving these problems. The qualitative results indicate that the Chinese sample preferred to use routine algorithms and symbolic representations, whereas the U.S. sample preferred to use concrete visual representations. Such a qualitative analysis of students' responses provided insights into U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical thinking, thereby facilitating interpretation of the cross-national differences in solving the process-constrained and process-open problems.     

Creative and algorithmic mathematical reasoning: effects of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggle

Two separate studies, Jonsson et al. (J. Math Behav. 2014;36: 20–32) and Karlsson Wirebring et al. (Trends Neurosci Educ. 2015;4(1–2):6–14), showed that learning mathematics using creative mathematical reasoning and constructing their own solution methods can be more efficient than if students use algorithmic reasoning and are given the solution procedures. It was argued that effortful struggle was the key that explained this difference. It was also argued that the results could not be explained by the effects of transfer-appropriate processing, although this was not empirically investigated. This study evaluated the hypotheses of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggle in relation to the specific characteristics associated with algorithmic reasoning task and creative mathematical reasoning task. In a between-subjects design, upper-secondary students were matched according to their working memory capacity.

The main finding was that the superior performance associated with practicing creative mathematical reasoning was mainly supported by effortful struggle, however, there was also an effect of transfer-appropriate processing. It is argued that students need to struggle with important mathematics that in turn facilitates the construction of knowledge. It is further argued that the way we construct mathematical tasks have consequences for how much effort students allocate to their task-solving attempt.     

Student Strategies Suggesting Emergence of Mental Structures Supporting Logical and Abstract Thinking: Multiplicative Reasoning

For many students, developing mathematical reasoning can prove to be challenging. Such difficulty may be explained by a deficit in the core understanding of many arithmetical concepts taught in early school years. Multiplicative reasoning is one such concept that produces an essential foundation upon which higher‐level mathematical thinking skills are built. The purpose of this study is to recognize indicators of multiplicative reasoning among fourth‐grade students. Through cross‐case analysis, the researcher used a test instrument to observe patterns of multiplicative reasoning at varying levels in a sample of 14 math students from a low socioeconomic school. Results indicate that the participants fell into three categories: premultiplicative, emergent, and multiplier. Consequently, 12 new sublevels were developed that further describe the multiplicative thinking of these fourth graders within the categories mentioned. Rather than being provided the standard mathematical algorithms, students should be encouraged to personally develop their own unique explanations, formulas, and understanding of general number system mechanics. When instructors are aware of their students' distinctive methods of determining multiplicative reasoning strategies and multiplying schemes, they are more apt to provide the most appropriate learning environment for their students.     

Advancing Mathematical Activity: A Practice-Oriented View of Advanced Mathematical Thinking

The purpose of this article is to contribute to the dialogue about the notion of advanced mathematical thinking by offering an alternative characterization for this idea, namely advancing mathematical activity. We use the term advancing (versus advanced) because we emphasize the progression and evolution of students' reasoning in relation to their previous activity. We also use the term activity, rather than thinking. This shift in language reflects our characterization of progression in mathematical thinking as acts of participation in a variety of different socially or culturally situated mathematical practices. For these practices, we emphasize the changing nature of students' mathematical activity and frame the process of progression in terms of multiple layers of horizontal and vertical mathematizing.     

Mathematical Thinking Involved in U.S. and Chinese Students' Solving of Process-Constrained and Process-Open Problems

This study examined U.S. and Chinese 6th-grade students' mathematical thinking and reasoning involved in solving 6 process-constrained and 6 process-open problems. The Chinese sample (from Guiyang, Guizhou) had a significantly higher mean score than the U.S. sample (from Milwaukee, Wisconsin) on the process-constrained tasks, but the sample of U.S. students had a significantly higher mean score than the sample of the Chinese students on the process-open tasks. A qualitative analysis of students' responses was conducted to understand the mathematical thinking and reasoning involved in solving these problems. The qualitative results indicate that the Chinese sample preferred to use routine algorithms and symbolic representations, whereas the U.S. sample preferred to use concrete visual representations. Such a qualitative analysis of students' responses provided insights into U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical thinking, thereby facilitating interpretation of the cross-national differences in solving the process-constrained and process-open problems.     

Mathematical Dimensions of Students' Use of Proportional Reasoning In High School Physics

This study examines the mathematical processes used by students when solving physics tasks requiring proportional reasoning. The study investigates students' understanding and explanations of their mathematical processes. A qualitative and interpretive case study was conducted with 6 students from a coeducational urban high school for 5 months. Students were engaged with some high school physics tasks requiring proportional reasoning, during which a hermeneutic dialectic design was used to investigate their processes, understandings, and difficulties. Research techniques such as interviews, dialectical discourses, journal dialogue, and video and audio recordings were employed to generate, analyze, and interpret data. Results of the study indicate that the students employed mathematical proportional reasoning patterns and algorithms which they could not explain. Students also had difficulties translating physics tasks into mathematical statements, symbols, and relations. Students could not perform mathematical operations that were not directly obvious from the physics tasks, and some had difficulty with division. Students did not have adequate understanding of the mathematical processes involved in proportional reasoning.     

Relational Reasoning about Numbers and Operations – Foundation for Calculation Strategy Use in Multi-Digit Multiplication and Division

Theoretical analysis of whole number-based calculation strategies and digit-based algorithms for multi-digit multiplication and division reveals that strategy use includes two kinds of reasoning: reasoning about the relations between numbers and reasoning about the relations between operations. In contrast, algorithms aim to reduce the necessary reasoning processes. In a sample of 221 German fourth graders, both kinds of relational reasoning were operationalized, as well as the use of strategies and algorithms in multiplication and division. The multi-dimensionality of the constructs and their discriminant validity were confirmed by a confirmatory factor analysis. The theoretically proposed, unidirectional relations between the constructs were investigated using a structural equation model: Abilities in reasoning about relations between numbers had a significant positive impact on strategy use in multiplication and division. Abilities in reasoning about relations between operations influenced strategy use in multiplication only. The use of algorithms in multiplication and division was exclusively affected by abilities in reasoning about relations between numbers, and not by abilities about relations between operations. Moreover, a negative effect of the use of digit-based algorithms on the use of whole number-based strategies was identified. Finally, the results of the theoretical and empirical analysis were integrated into a synthesis of existing models about calculation strategy use and development.     

An investigation of pedagogical techniques in Descartes' La géométrie

Much research has been conducted about the philosophy and mathematical writings of René Descartes, but that which focuses on pedagogy does so in a holistic manner. The present study uses a systematic approach to identify pedagogical techniques within each sentence of Descartes' La géométrie. Next, the study provides an analysis of La géométrie based on the techniques identified, their frequencies, and patterns of use within the text. The results of this analysis indicate that Descartes placed a high value on the use of demonstration, particularly in conjunction with deductive reasoning and multiple representations; that Descartes believed his method of approaching mathematical problems was superior to other methods; and that Descartes was in fact concerned with whether his readers understood his ideas or not.     

“Playing the game” of story problems: Coordinating situation-based reasoning with algebraic representation

This study critically examines a key justification used by educational stakeholders for placing mathematics in context –the idea that contextualization provides students with access to mathematical ideas. We present interviews of 24 ninth grade students from a low-performing urban school solving algebra story problems, some of which were personalized to their experiences. Using a situated cognition framework, we discuss how students use informal strategies and situational knowledge when solving story problems, as well how they engage in non-coordinative reasoning where situation-based reasoning is disconnected from symbol-based reasoning and other problem-solving actions. Results suggest that if contextualization is going to provide students with access to algebraic ideas, supports need to be put in place for students to make connections between formal algebraic representation, informal arithmetic-based reasoning, and situational knowledge.