“Anti‐Electrostatic” Halogen Bonding

Halogen bonding is often described as being driven predominantly by electrostatics, and thus adducts between anionic halogen bond (XB) donors (halogen‐based Lewis acids) and anions seem counterintuitive. Such “anti‐electrostatic” XBs have been predicted theoretically but for organic XB donors, there are currently no experimental examples except for a few cases of self‐association. Reported herein is the synthesis of two negatively charged organoiodine derivatives that form anti‐electrostatic XBs with anions. Even though the electrostatic potential is universally negative across the surface of both compounds, DFT calculations indicate kinetic stabilization of their halide complexes in the gas phase and particularly in solution. Experimentally, self‐association of the anionic XB donors was observed in solid‐state structures, resulting in dimers, trimers, and infinite chains. In addition, co‐crystals with halides were obtained, representing the first cases of halogen bonding between an organic anionic XB donor and a different anion. The bond lengths of all observed interactions are 14–21 % shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii.     

An All‐Halogen Bonding Rotaxane for Selective Sensing of Halides in Aqueous Media

The synthesis and anion binding properties of the first rotaxane host system to bind and sense anions purely through halogen bonding, is described. Through a combination of polarized iodotriazole and iodotriazolium halogen bond donors, a three‐dimensional cavity is created for anion binding. This rotaxane incorporates a luminescent rhenium(I) bipyridyl metal sensor motif within the macrocycle component, thus enabling optical study of the anion binding properties. The rotaxane topology was confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis, demonstrating halogen bonding between the electrophilic iodine atoms and chloride anions. In 50 % H₂O/CH₃CN solvent mixtures the rotaxane host exhibits strong binding affinity and selectivity for chloride, bromide, and iodide over a range of oxoanions.     

Dihalomethanes as Bent Bifunctional XB/XB‐Donating Building Blocks for Construction of Metal‐involving Halogen Bonded Hexagons

The dihalomethanes CH₂X₂ (X=Cl, Br, I) were co‐crystallized with the isocyanide complexes trans‐[MX^M₂(CNC₆H₄‐4‐X^C)₂] (M=Pd, Pt; X^M=Br, I; X^C=F, Cl, Br) to give an extended series comprising 15 X‐ray structures of isostructural adducts featuring 1D metal‐involving hexagon‐like arrays. In these structures, CH₂X₂ behave as bent bifunctional XB/XB‐donating building blocks, whereas trans‐[MX^M₂(CNC₆H₄‐4‐X^C)₂] act as a linear XB/XB acceptors. Results of DFT calculations indicate that all XCH₂–X???X^M–M contacts are typical noncovalent interactions with estimated strengths in the range of 1.3–3.2 kcal mol^?1. A CCDC search reveals that hexagon‐like arrays are rather common but previously overlooked structural motives for adducts of trans‐bis(halide) complexes and halomethanes.     

Supramolecular Assembly of Metal Complexes by (Aryl)I⋅⋅⋅d [PtII] Halogen Bonds

The theoretical data for the half-lantern complexes [{Pt( )(μ- )}₂] [ 1 – 3 ; is cyclometalated 2-Ph-benzothiazole; is 2-SH-pyridine ( 1 ), 2-SH-benzoxazole ( 2 ), 2-SH-tetrafluorobenzothiazole ( 3 )] indicate that the Pt ⋅⋅⋅ Pt orbital interaction increases the nucleophilicity of the outer d orbitals to provide assembly with electrophilic species. Complexes 1 – 3 were co-crystallized with bifunctional halogen bonding (XB) donors to give adducts ( 1 – 3 )₂ ⋅ (1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene) and infinite polymeric [ 1⋅ 1,1′-diiodoperfluorodiphenyl]_n. X-ray crystallography revealed that the supramolecular assembly is achieved through (Aryl)I ⋅⋅⋅ d [Pt^II] XBs between iodine σ-holes and lone pairs of the positively charged (Pt^II)₂ centers acting as nucleophilic sites. The polymer includes a curved linear chain ⋅⋅⋅ Pt₂ ⋅⋅⋅ I(arene^F)I ⋅⋅⋅ Pt₂ ⋅⋅⋅ involving XB between iodine atoms of the perfluoroarene linkers and (Pt^II)₂ moieties. The ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR, UV/Vis, and CV studies indicate that XB is preserved in CH(D)₂Cl₂ solutions.     

Halogen Bonding in Organic Synthesis and Organocatalysis

Halogen bonding is a noncovalent interaction similar to hydrogen bonding, which is based on electrophilic halogen substituents. Hydrogen‐bonding‐based organocatalysis is a well‐established strategy which has found numerous applications in recent years. In light of this, halogen bonding has recently been introduced as a key interaction for the design of activators or organocatalysts that is complementary to hydrogen bonding. This Concept features a discussion on the history and electronic origin of halogen bonding, summarizes all relevant examples of its application in organocatalysis, and provides an overview on the use of cationic or polyfluorinated halogen‐bond donors in halide abstraction reactions or in the activation of neutral organic substrates.     

Iodine(III) Derivatives as Halogen Bonding Organocatalysts

Hypervalent iodine(III) derivatives are known as versatile reagents in organic synthesis, but there is only one previous report on their use as Lewis acidic organocatalysts. Herein, we present first strong indications for the crucial role of halogen bonding in this kind of catalyses. To this end, the solvolysis of benzhydryl chloride and the Diels–Alder reaction of cyclopentadiene with methyl vinyl ketone served as benchmark reactions for halide abstraction and the activation of neutral compounds. Iodolium compounds (cyclic diaryl iodonium species) were used as activators or catalysts, and we were able to markedly reduce or completely switch off their activity by sterically blocking one or two of their electrophilic axes. Compared with previously established bidentate cationic halogen bond donors, the monodentate organoiodine derivatives used herein are at least similarly active (in the Diels–Alder reaction) or even decidedly more active (in benzhydryl chloride solvolysis).     

Stacking Interactions: A Supramolecular Approach to Upgrade Weak Halogen Bond Donors

The co-crystallization of tetracyanobenzene (TCB) with haloarenes ArX provided six new co-crystals TCB ⋅ ArX (ArX=PhCl, PhBr, 4-MeC₆H₄Cl, 4-MeC₆H₄Br, 4-MeOC₆H₄Cl, 1,2-Br₂C₆H₄) which were studied by X-ray diffraction. In these systems, the strong collective effect of π⋅⋅⋅π stacking interactions and lone pair-(X)⋅⋅⋅π-hole-(C) bondings between TCB and ArX promote the strength of X⋅⋅⋅N_cyano halogen bonding (HaB). Theoretical studies showed that the stacking interactions affect the σ-hole depth of the haloarenes, thus significantly boosting their ability to function as HaB donors. According to the molecular electrostatic potential calculations, the σ- hole-(Cl) value (1.5 kcal/mol) in the haloarene 4-MeOC₆H₄Cl (featuring an electron-rich arene moiety and exhibiting very poor σ-hole-(Cl) ability) increases significantly in the stacked trimer (TCB)₂ ⋅ 4-MeOC₆H₄Cl (12.5 kcal/mol). Theoretical DFT calculations demonstrate the dramatic increase of X⋅⋅⋅N_cyano HaB strength for stacked trimers in comparison with parent unstacked haloarenes.     

Four-Center Nodes: Supramolecular Synthons Based on Cyclic Halogen Bonding

The isocyanide trans-[PdBr₂(CNC₆H₄-4-X′)₂] (X′=Br, I) and nitrile trans-[PtX₂(NCC₆H₄-4-X′)₂] (X/X′=Cl/Cl, Cl/Br, Br/Cl, Br/Br) complexes exhibit similar structural motif in the solid state, which is determined by hitherto unreported four-center nodes formed by cyclic halogen bonding. Each node is built up by four Type II C−X′⋅⋅⋅X−M halogen-bonding contacts and include one Type I M−X⋅⋅⋅X−M interaction, thus giving the rhombic-like structure. These nodes serve as supramolecular synthons to form 2D layers or double chains of molecules linked by a halogen bond. Results of DFT calculations indicate that all contacts within the nodes are typical noncovalent interactions with the estimated strengths in the range 0.6–2.9 kcal mol⁻¹.     

Halogen Bonding Between Anions: Association of Anion Radicals of Tetraiodo‐p‐benzoquinone with Iodide Anions

Halogen bonding between two negatively charged species, tetraiodo‐p‐benzoquinone anion radicals (I₄Q^?.) and iodide anions, was observed and characterized for the first time. X‐ray structural and EPR/UV–Vis spectral studies revealed that the anion–anion bonding led to the formation of crystals comprising 2D layers of I₄Q^?. anion radicals linked by iodides and separated by Et₄N⁺ counter‐ions. Computational analysis suggested that the seemingly antielectrostatic halogen bonds in these systems were formed via a combination of several factors. First, an attenuation of the interionic repulsion by the solvent facilitated close approach of the anions leading to their mutual polarization. This resulted in the appearance of positively charged areas (σ‐holes) on the surface of the iodine substituents in I₄Q^?. responsible for the attractive interaction. Finally, the solid‐state associations were also stabilized by multicenter (4:4) halogen bonding between I₄Q^?. and iodide.     

Halogen Bonding: An Interim Discussion

Halogen bonding is a noncovalent interaction that is receiving rapidly increasing attention because of its significance in biological systems and its importance in the design of new materials in a variety of areas, for example, electronics, nonlinear optical activity, and pharmaceuticals. The interactions can be understood in terms of electrostatics/polarization and dispersion; they involve a region of positive electrostatic potential on a covalently bonded halogen and a negative site, such as the lone pair of a Lewis base. The positive potential, labeled a σ hole, is on the extension of the covalent bond to the halogen, which accounts for the characteristic near‐linearity of halogen bonding. In many instances, the lateral sides of the halogen have negative electrostatic potentials, allowing it to also interact favorably with positive sites. In this discussion, after looking at some of the experimental observations of halogen bonding, we address the origins of σ holes, the factors that govern the magnitudes of their electrostatic potentials, and the properties of the resulting complexes with negative sites. The relationship of halogen and hydrogen bonding is examined. We also point out that σ‐hole interactions are not limited to halogens, but can also involve covalently bonded atoms of Groups IV–VI. Examples of applications in biological/medicinal chemistry and in crystal engineering are mentioned, taking note that halogen bonding can be “tuned” to fit various requirements, that is, strength of interaction, steric factors, and so forth.     

Halogen Bonding between an Isoindoline Nitroxide and 1,4‐Diiodotetrafluorobenzene: New Tools and Tectons for Self‐Assembling Organic Spin Systems

Radical assembly : Halogen bonding has been observed for the first time between an isoindoline nitroxide and an iodoperfluorocarbon (see figure), which cocrystallize to form a discrete 2:1 supramolecular compound in which N? O^.???I halogen bonding is the dominant intermolecular interaction. This illustrates the potential use of halogen bonding and isoindoline nitroxide tectons for the assembly of organic spin systems.

     

Iodoalkyne‐Based Catalyst‐Mediated Activation of Thioamides through Halogen Bonding

Halogen bonding catalysis has recently gained increasing attention as a powerful tool to activate organic molecules. However, the variety of the catalyst structure has been quite limited so far. Herein, we report the first example of the use of an iodoalkyne as a halogen bond donor catalyst. By using an iodoalkyne bearing a pentafluorophenyl group as a catalyst, thioamides were efficiently activated and reacted with 2‐aminophenol to generate benzoxazoles in good yield. Mechanistic studies, including ¹³C NMR spectroscopic analysis and several control experiments, provided concrete evidence that this catalytic activation is based on halogen bonding. Thus, the results obtained in this study demonstrate that iodoalkynes can serve as a new scaffold for future development of halogen bonding catalysis.